2. Outline
ο¬β― Summary last lecture
ο¬β― Text β a visual sign system
ο¬β― Image β a different visual sign system
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 2
3. Intro knowledge - summary
Investigated
ο¬β― Different types of knowledge, epistemological aspects of
knowledge, in particular constructivism, and established
knowledge representation methods
Findings
ο¬β― Knowledge, as part of communication, has to be situated, reliable,
and justifiable
ο¬β― A knowledge representation is a surrogate that provides a set of
ontology commitments to be able to state things about a domain.
ο¬β― There are already a large variety of knowledge representation
techniques available, of which most follow the epistemological
understanding of knowledge by focussing on propositional
representations.
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 3
4. Knowledge and symbolic communication
p c
Signal Source Signal Observer
Knowledge :
expertise, and skills acquired through
ο¬β―
experience or education
p = perceive
ILPS c = conceive
Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS
5. Knowledge and symbolic communication
Representing knowledge in media-based
systems requires:
ο¬β― Relevant conceptual models
ο¬β― A language to represent the models
ο¬β― Interpretation mechanisms
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 5
6. Text β a visual sign system
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 6
7. Approaching text
A (Alphabet)β«ββ¬ B (Logogram)β«ββ¬
Saussure, Ferdinand de - (1857-1913)
Swiss linguist. His Course in General
Linguistics (1916, posthumous) is generally
considered to be the foundation of modern
linguistics. He envisaged the development
of semiology as a science of signs.
Peirce, Charles S. - (1839-1914) American
scientist and philosopher. One of the
foremost philosophers of 'pragmatism' - no
object or concept possesses validity or
importance in its own right. Its significance
lies only in the practical effects of its use or
application. For Communication and Media
students, his importance lies primarily in his
development of semiotics.
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 7
9. Text β a sign system I
A code is a rule-governed system of signs,
whose rules and conventions are shared
amongst members of a culture, and which is
used to generate and circulate meanings in
and for that culture.
A set of signs that A set of agreed rules for
carry meaning. combining those signs
together
ο¬β― Perceptual (e.g. Typography)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Syntagmatic (e.g. Grammar)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Paradigmatic (e.g. Ontology)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Social (e.g. Word use)β«ββ¬
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 9
10. Text β a sign system II
Syntagms are often defined as 'sequential' (and
thus temporal - as in speech and music), but
they can represent spatial relationships. The
plane of the syntagm is that of the combination
of 'this-and-this-and-this' (syntax).
Example:
shoes socks pants sweater scarf hat
A paradigmatic structure represents potential
substitutions in which a range of candidates can
take the place of a sign in the syntagmatic
structure. The plane of the paradigm is that of the
selection of 'this-or-this-or-this' (semantics).
Example:
knickers
short
shoes socks pants sweater scarf hat
kilt
tights
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 10
11. Text β a sign system III
Representation and Transformation mechanisms
Syntagm
β’β― Spatial relations (horizontal and vertical axi,
centre and margin)β«ββ¬
β’β― Logical order (grammar)β«ββ¬
β’β― Exposition (proposition, evidence, justification
β’β― Narrative space (exposition, retardation,
digression, omission, redundancy)β«ββ¬ processes
β’β― Narrative time (ellipses, compression, insertion,
dilation)β«ββ¬
Paradigm
β’β― clusters (e.g. synonyms)β«ββ¬
β’β― doublets (e.g. oppositions)β«ββ¬ Semantic field: '...a
β’β― proportional series ( e.g. a series of conceptual structure
oppositional doublets such as which organises
female - male, passive - active, etc.)β«ββ¬ potential meanings in
=> Taxonomy
relation to others'
β’β― hierarchies (ordered semantic units => Conceptual graph,
based on relations of inclusion or semantic network,
exclusion, e.g. ontology
Pekinese/dog/animal/living thing).
=> Thesaurus
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 11
12. Text β Description languages/mechanisms
β’β― XHTML(5) is a markup language that has the same depth of expression as HTML,
but also conforms to XML syntax.
β’β― XHTML Basic is an XML-based structured markup language primarily used for
simple (mainly hand-held) user agents, typically mobile devices.
β’β― DATR is a language for lexical knowledge representation. The lexical knowledge is
encoded in a network of nodes. Each node has a set of attributes encoded
with it.
β’β― CyCL is a declarative language based on classical first-order logic, with extensions
for modal operators and higher order quantification
β’β― RDF a general method of modelling information, through a variety of syntax formats
β’β― RDFS is an extensible knowledge representation language, providing basic
elements for the description of ontologies
β’β― OWL is a family of knowledge representation languages for authoring ontologies that
are based on Description Logics.
β’β― Dublin Core is a standard for cross-domain information resource description. It
provides a simple and standardised set of conventions for describing things
online in ways that make them easier to find.
β’β― FOAF is a machine-readable ontology describing persons, their activities and their
relations to other people and objects
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 12
13. Text β Description methods β RDF example
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Benn" identifies a particular resource.
To say that the title of this resource is "Tony Benn" and its publisher is "Wikipedia" we need
tow valid N-triple like valid RDF statements:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Benn> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title> "Tony Benn" .
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Benn> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/publisher> "Wikipedia" .
And these statements might be expressed in RDF/XML as:
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Benn">
<dc:title>Tony Benn</dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Wikipedia</dc:publisher>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Meaning in English:
The title of this resource, which is published by Wikipedia, is 'Tony Benn'
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 13
14. Text β a sign system summary I
Text is a sign system strong on arbitrariness,
proposing the autonomy of language in relation to
reality.
Text emphasis on internal structures and thus does
not 'reflect' reality but rather constructs it.
Text is conventional with an emphasis on the types
index and symbol.
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 14
15. Text β a sign system summary II
Representing Text in a media-based system:
Conceptual models for:
ο¬β― Typography
ο¬β― Layout
ο¬β― Writing system (e.g. Alphabet)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Syntax (e.g. grammar, markup languages, ....)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Dictionaries
ο¬β― Semantics (e.g. taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology,
conceptual graph, etc.)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Style (e.g. frame, template, script,....)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Genre (e.g. template, conceptual graph)β«ββ¬
Interpretation depends on the task:
ο¬β― Search (e.g. text understanding, word matching
and/or ranking)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Generation (e.g. text understanding, question-
answering, ....)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Comparison (e.g. Syntax (pattern matching) or
semantics (clustering, distance evaluation, etc.)β«ββ¬
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 15
21. Image β a different visual sign system
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 21
22. Approaching an image
" Legend of Orpheus & Eurydice ", 2001,
The Werner Collection
http://www.wernercollection.com/WorldView1.htm
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 22
23. Approaching an image
Concept
Mental perception
of media
SIGN
Signifier
(material)β«ββ¬
Signified
(meaning)β«ββ¬ ?
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS
24. Approaching an image
Mise en scene
Framing
Genre
Colour
Distance
(foreground - background)β«ββ¬ Object
Materiality
Meaning
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 24
25. Image β a sign system I
Perceptual codes
β’β― perceptive codes (establish the condition for effective
perception)
β’β― recognition codes which are blocks of signifieds we use to
recognize objects
β’β― transmission codes which construct the determining
conditions for the perception of an image (dots that make
up a newspaper image)
Textual codes
β’β― tonal codes address the prosodic features by
connoting them with particular intonation of the sign
β’β― Iconic codes (figures, signs, semes)
β’β― Iconographic codes connote more complex and
culturalized semes that are immediately identifiable and
classifiable, such as "the four horsemen of the
Apocalypse".
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 25
26. Image β a sign system II
Social codes
β’β― verbal language
β’β― bodily codes (bodily contact, physical orientation, gaze,
gestures and posture);
β’β― commodity codes (fashions, clothing, cars);
β’β― behavioural codes (protocols, rituals, role-playing, games)
β’β― ideological codes (encoding' and 'decoding' information by
using theories such as individualism, liberalism, feminism,
materialism, capitalism, socialism, etc.)
Syntagmatic - paradigmatic codes
β’β― scientific codes, including mathematics;
β’β― aesthetic codes (poetry, drama, painting, sculpture, music,
etc.)
β’β― genre, rhetorical and stylistic codes (e.g. in narrative: plot,
character, action, dialogue, setting, etc.),
β’β― mass media codes (e.g. in photography, TV, film, radio,
newspaper and magazine, etc.)
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 26
27. Image β a sign system III
Denotation describes the 'literal' or 'obvious'
meaning of a sign. Thus, denotation of a
representational visual image is what all
viewers from any culture and at any time
would recognize the image as depicting.
Denotation is the first level of signification.
Sensory Media
system
Perceptual codes
Textual codes
Social codes
Sign I
(denotative sign with signifier and signified)β«ββ¬
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 27
28. Image β a sign system IV
Connotation refers to the socio-cultural and
'personal' associations (ideological, emotional
etc.) of the sign. These are typically related to
the interpreter's class, age, gender, ethnicity
and so on.
Connotation is the second level of signification.
Sign I + Signified
Social codes
Syntagmatic codes + experiences
Paradigmatic codes associations
Sign II
(connotative sign with signifier and signified)β«ββ¬
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 28
29. Image β a sign system V
The third level of signification.
Social codes
value
Sign II Syntagmatic codes
Paradigmatic codes
Sign III
(valued signifier and signified)β«ββ¬
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 29
30. Image β a sign system VI
Signification difference between text and image
On the 1st step:
Text => provides an index as a signified
Image => sets the signified
The reader replaces each The viewer has to establish
index (word) of the provided the order of importance
order with a signified for his (using step 2) =>
or her liking => particular the 3rd step of
the 3rd step of signification signification becomes
does not cause a problem, as important as it is the
it is already matched in the comparison with the own
first step sign system (comparison
with what is not shown) that
determines how the
perceiver values and thus
understands the material.
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 30
31. Image β Description methods
" Legend of Orpheus &
Eurydice ", 2001,
The Werner Collection
.
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 31
32. Image β Description methods
MPEG-21
MPEG-7
MPEG-4
MPEG-2
MPEG-1
ISO W3C
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 32
33. Image β Description methods
The Moving Picture Experts Group, commonly
referred to as simply MPEG, is a working group of
ISO/IEC charged with the development of video and
MPEG-21 audio encoding standards.
MPEG-7
Support video/audio "objects", 3D content, low
MPEG-4 bitrate encoding and Digital Rights Management.
Several new higher efficiency video standards.
MPEG-2 Transport, video and audio standards for broadcast-
quality television.
MPEG-1 Initial video and audio compression standard. Later
also the standard for Video CD, and MP3.
ISO
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 33
34. Image β Description methods
MPEG describes this standard as a
MPEG-21 multimedia framework.
A multimedia content description standard.
MPEG-7
MPEG-4
MPEG-2
MPEG-1
ISO
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 34
35. Image β Description methods
The goals of the Multimedia Semantics
Incubator Group is to explain the advantages
of using Semantic Web languages and
technologies for the creation, storage,
manipulation, interchange and processing of
image metadata.
In addition, it provides guidelines for Semantic
Web-based image annotation, illustrated by
use cases.
Relevant RDF and OWL vocabularies are
discussed, along with a short overview of
publicly available tools.
W3C http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 35
36. Image β a sign system summary
An image is a a dominantly iconic sign
system, proposing a union in relation to
reality.
The denotative power of an image, the
optical pattern, communicates a precise
knowledge, which releases the audience
from the process of decision making but
leaves a problem of interpretation
(signification process).
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 36
37. Image β a sign system summary II
Representing an Image in a media-based system:
Conceptual models for:
ο¬β― quantitative or qualitative characterization of optical
pattern (feature extraction (colour, texture, light,
angle, etc.), pattern recognition (line, shape region,
etc.), multi-scale signal analysis, ...)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Spatial dimensions
=> textual metadata
ο¬β― Semantics (e.g. taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology, etc.)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Semantic markers (key word, tag, schema, ....)β«ββ¬
to express higher semantics , such as forms, styles,
genres, aesthetics, social codes.
Interpretation depends on the task:
ο¬β― Search (e.g. retrieval by example)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Generation (e.g. Qualitative support on features
and higher semantics)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Presentation (e.g. browsing through collage)β«ββ¬
ο¬β― Automatic art generation
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 37
47. Text and Image β summary
Both text and images refer to the same modality and
domain knowledge but they establish different sign
systems.
Both differ on the denotative level of signification.
Both differ on their paradicmatic processes.
Text can be used for text to provide metadata
(sematic representations) in automatic processes.
Images rely on textual metadata to facilitate
automatic processes on the 2nd and 3rd level of
signification => mixed processes and representation
structures.
ILPS Frank Nack nack@uva.nl KBMS 47