High-temperature receiver designs for solar powered supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles that can produce ~50 MW of Electricity is being investigated. Advantages of a supercritical CO2 closed-loop Brayton cycle with recuperation include high efficiency (~50%) and a small footprint relative to equivalent systems employing steam Rankine power cycles. Heating for the supercritical CO2 system occurs in a high-temperature solar receiver that can produce temperatures of at least 700 °C. Depending on whether the CO2 is heated directly or indirectly, the receiver may need to withstand pressures up to 20 MPa (200 bar). Designs for direct heating of CO2 include volumetric receivers and indirect volumetric receiver.
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Design of open volumetric receiver for air &supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle
1. Designof open volumetric receiver for air & supercritical CO2
Brayton cycle
Usman Ali, M. Ahmad, H. Zahid Ali, Qamar Abbas
2014-UET-CCET-ME-05 2014-UET-CCET-ME-09 2014-UET-CCET-ME-14 2014-UET-CCET-ME-15
manimani7869@gmail.com muhammadahmad5101@gmail.com hafizzahidali622@gmail.com qamarabbas7824@gmail.com
CHENAB COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHONLOGY GRW
Department: Mechanical Engineering
Submitted on 18 January 2017
Submitted To: Prof. Kamran Mahboob
Abstract
High-temperature receiver designs for solar powered supercritical CO2 Brayton
cycles that can produce ~50 MW of Electricity is being investigated. Advantages of
a supercritical CO2 closed-loop Brayton cycle with recuperation include high
efficiency (~50%) and a small footprint relative to equivalent systems employing
steam Rankine power cycles. Heating for the supercritical CO2 system occurs in a
high-temperature solar receiver that can produce temperatures of at least 700 °C.
Depending on whether the CO2 is heated directly or indirectly, the receiver may
need to withstand pressures up to 20 MPa (200 bar). Designs for direct heating of
CO2 include volumetric receivers and indirect volumetric receiver.
Advantages and disadvantages of alternative designs are presented.
2. INTRODUCTION
In solar power tower plants (SPTP) the receiver is a main component in which the
concentrated solar energy is absorbed and then transferred to a working fluid.
Volumetric receivers are characterized by having a highly porous absorber that
allows solar radiation to be absorbed deep within its interior. A fan sucks the
working gas (usually air) through absorbent pores, and the convective airflow
takes up the heat. The outlet air temperature should be higher than the
temperature of the absorber material on its irradiated side. Furthermore, the
volumetric absorber design means that the effective area for solar absorption is
many times larger than that of thermal radiation losses. The combination of these
characteristics is termed the volumetric effect and results in
a minimization of absorber thermal radiation loss. The volumetric concept has
other promising characteristics, such as its simplified heat transfer mechanism, in
which both solar absorption and convective heat transfer occur on the same
surface. This reduces the material stress in the absorber and allows the outlet air
temperature to approach its thermal resistance point. The
large absorption surface permits high solar fluxes in the receive aperture, thus
reducing the receiver size.
Supercritical CO2 (s-CO2) thermodynamic cycles are projected to improve overall
CSP plant economics due to their high power conversion efficiency and compact
system layout. The s-CO2 Brayton cycle is essentially a recuperated, low pressure
ratio closed cycle gas turbine concept. Use of a closed-cycle system permits a
working fluid other than air, in this case carbon dioxide, and allows cycle
operation at elevated pressures. For the s-CO2 Brayton cycle in particular, the
high cycle thermal efficiency (45-50%) is achievable by means of pumping CO2 in
its high pressure supercritical dense phase (at7.5MPa, 31°C), where little
compression work is expended, then taking full advantage of recuperative heat
transfer for preheating, before finally expanding the supercritical fluid at high
temperature (at 20 MPa, 550-700°C). High fluid densities at the compressor and
turbine (500 kg/m3 and 100 kg/m3, respectively) are largely responsible for an
anticipated order of magnitude reduction in turbo-machinery size as compared to
steam plants.
3. ALTERNATIVE RECEIVER DESIGNS
1.1. Direct Receiver Designs
Direct receiver designs for s-CO2 applications require high pressures (up to 20
MPa) and temperatures (~500 °C – 700 °C). See figure 1 shows a schematic of a
solar-driven, direct-heated, closed-loop s-CO2 Brayton power cycle. Several direct
receiver designs are evaluated in the following sections.
1.1.1. Direct Volumetric Receiver
Volumetric receivers use highly porous structures (honeycomb, foam, wire mesh,
etc.) of metal or ceramic to absorb concentrated sunlight and allow penetration
of the incident radiation into the volume of the receiver. This absorbed heat is
transferred to a fluid passing through it. The thermal energy of the fluid is then
converted to electricity by adopting suitable thermodynamic power cycles (e.g.
Rankine, Brayton cycle, etc.)
Directly heated volumetric receivers require a closed (pressurized) design that can
be coupled directly to the gas turbine (single loop operation) to operate at higher
pressures. Such receivers have been tested with absolute operating pressure of
15 bar and air outlet temperatures of 800 °C [9, 10] (see Figure 3). The higher
4. pressure operation is feasible because of a transparent window which separates
the receiver cavity from ambient air. Also, the window minimizes thermal losses.
However, containing s-CO2 at ~ 20 MPa (200 bar) and up to 700°C would require
a robust window design having excellent optical properties to prevent reflective
losses and degradation. It would need to be equipped with sealing and cooling
systems to prevent mechanical damage and leakages. Other challenges associated
with volumetric receivers are absorber durability and unstable gas flow, which, as
predicted by Kribus et al. [11], can cause local overheating leading to its poor
performance and local failures (melting or cracking).
1.2. Indirect Receiver Designs
Indirect receiver designs for s-CO2 applications alleviate the need for high
pressures within the receiver, but high temperature heat exchangers are required
to transfer the heat from the heat-transfer fluid to the working fluid (s-CO2).
Examples of heat-transfer fluid (media) include air, molten salt, liquid metals, or
solid particles. The primary advantages of indirect receivers is the ability to
incorporate thermal storage and to suppress transient effects (e.g., cloud
passages). Figure 2 shows a schematic of a solar-driven, indirectly heated, closed
loop s-CO2 Brayton power cycle that incorporates an additional heat exchanger
and storage. Some heat-transfer media that can be stored directly include molten
salt, liquid metals, and solid particles. Other heat-transfer media, such as air,
would require and additional heat exchanger if storage is desired. Several
5. concepts for indirect s-CO2 receiver designs and heat-transfer media are
presented in the following sections.
1.2.1. Indirect Volumetric Receiver
Power plants with an indirect or open volumetric receiver design are generally
equipped with two loops consisting of two different fluids. The heat-transfer fluid
(usually air) at atmospheric pressure gets heated and pulled through the open
volumetric receiver, and a heat exchanger transfers this heat to higher pressure
fluid in the secondary loop. The secondary fluid then drives the turbine to
generate power (e.g., 1.5 MWe Rankine cycle at the Julich Solar Tower, Germany).
Brayton-cycle-based power plants consisting of s-CO2 as the working fluid would
require an air-s-CO2 heat exchanger of large surface area due to the low overall
heat transfer coefficient. The presence of two loops and high air temperature lead
to higher thermal losses, thus increasing the system complexities and also
reducing system efficiency.
6. 1.3. Summary
Alternative high-temperature solar receiver designs for supercritical CO2 power
cycles have been reviewed. Challenging aspects of implementing solar receivers
with s- CO2 power cycles include high CO2 fluid pressures (~20 MPa) and
temperatures (~500 °C – 700 °C). Receiver designs that can heat the s-CO2 directly
include volumetric receivers and tubular receivers. Indirect receiver designs that
require an additional heat exchanger to heat the s-CO2 from the heat transfer
media in volumetric receivers.
The heat-transfer media employed by indirect receiver designs can include air,
molten salts, liquid metals, and solid particles. An inherent advantage of indirect
receivers is the ability to store thermal energy for dispatchability of electricity as
needed. Table 1 summarizes the benefits and challenges of each of the receiver
designs reviewed.
7. RESIVER DESIGN
Absorber, mixer assembly, and the air return cooling system (ARCS) are the major
components of a volumetric air receiver. The absorber is a porous structure that
transfers heat from solar radiation volumetrically to air with high solar-to-thermal
efficiency. Despite non-uniform solar radiation flux incident on the absorbers, the
mixer ensures uniform air temperature at the receiver exit. This will mitigate the
resulting thermal stresses on the piping/joints/ connections to the rest of the
system. Overheating of absorbers is prevented by the ARCS. In view of the
selected application of solar convective heating and to fulfil its requirement, Open
Volumetric Air Receiver (OVAR) would be more appropriate. A schematic diagram
of an OVAR is shown in Fig. 3. The design of individual OVAR components will be
discussed hereafter.
8. 2.1. Absorber
Three major factors in the design of absorbers, namely, porosity, length of pores,
and absorber material are considered. Clearly, for efficient volumetric heating,
the porosity should be as high as possible subject to the mechanical integrity of
the absorber. However, very high porosity would imply uniformly spaced smaller
pore diameters, which may result in thermal instability. This is especially of
special consideration for circular or similar types of holes. The absorber length
should be such that the temperatures of the air and the solid are close to each
other at the absorber exit. Thermal diffusivity of he absorber material should be
sufficiently high to avoid high temperature gradients both in the axial and radial
directions.
2.2. Mixer assembly
The non-uniform solar radiation incident on the receiver would, in all probability,
result in non-uniform temperature distribution in the air coming out from the
seven absorbers resulting in thermal stresses on the receiver. Consequently, the
mixer assembly homogenizes the air temperature coming out of the absorbers.
The schematic of the OVAR including the designed mixer assembly is shown in Fig.
3, and it consists of (a) foot pieces connecting the outlet of each absorber to a
mixing chamber and (b) a perforated plate with a convergent nozzle.
9. 2.3. Foot piece
Fig. 4a shows a schematic diagram of the hollow, cylindro-conical foot piece
attached to the rear of an absorber, the fabricated foot piece is shown in Fig. 4b.
The main purpose of the foot piece is to homogenize the radial temperature
gradient at the absorber exit. One end of the foot piece is inserted in the anchor
plate, which secures the absorber attached to it (see Fig. 3) The design variables
in a foot piece are (i) convergence angle and (ii) length of the cylindrical section,
the optimum values of which were determined from CFD simulations. Analogy is
drawn here from a venturi tube, which, to reduce undue drag, has entry and exit
cone angles of 30 and 5 respectively. Therefore, convergence angles of 20 and 40
and a cylinder length of L = 25.4 mm were used in the simulations. For the
performed CFD analysis, a mass flow rate of 0.00143 kg/s at the inlet of one foot
piece. a foot piece with a convergence angle of 40 and 25.4 mm cylinder length
was adopted as the final design.
Perforated plate with convergent nozzle
The purpose of the mixer assembly beyond the foot piece is twofold. One, it
should generate sufficient turbulence to ensure a uniform temperature profile at
the exit of the receiver assembly. Two, this system should generate sufficient
pressure drop to circumvent flow instability in absorbers. Passive grids and
perforated plates have been used for generating quasi-isotropic turbulence.
10. 2.4. Air return cooling system (ARCS)
The hot air from the OVAR assembly transfers heat to a heat exchanger and/or
thermal storage system. This relatively cooled air is recycled back into the OVAR
for cooling and reducing the non-uniform temperature distribution in the
absorbers and the related foot pieces, which, in turn, would mitigate the resulting
thermal stress. Consequently, the ARCS also serves as a heat recovery system. The
fraction of the returned or recycled air, which is sucked in after mixing with the
atmospheric air is described as the Air Return Ratio (ARR). It is affected by the
design of receiver and its material. The return air is injected mid-way between the
absorber outlet and the anchor plate, as shown in Fig. 3. It then flows in the space
between the absorbers and comes out from the front end of the receiver. As
stated above, part of the return air is sucked back into the absorbers. Here the 6
circular inlets, 60_ apart, with air injection between foot pieces
.
11. The space between the anchor plate and the perforated has a dual purpose: (i)
preliminary mixing of the obtained hot air from foot pieces and (ii) collection and
disposal of dust. This system would ensure that dust free air circulates in the
OVAR and is being currently investigated.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN OF OVAR
The major objective of experimentally evaluating the OVAR was to check the
validity of the calculation/assumptions made in designing different OVAR
components.
12.
13. Calculations:
Components Details
Casing
Absorbers
Footpiece
Perforatedplate
Mixer
Return airinjection
port
Diameter of casing: 100 mm
Totalno.:7,Diameterofpores:2mm,Totalno.ofpores:581,lengthofabsorber:
25.4mm,diameterofabsorber:25.4mm, porosity ~ 52%
Convergent angle ~ 40°, length of the extruded portion: 25.4 mm Anchor plate,
No. of pores in anchor plate: 7, diameter of pore: 19.5 mm Mixing chamber,
Length of mixing chamber: 20mm
Total no. of pores: 12, staggered arrangement, diameter of pore: 14.4 mm
Convergent angle ~ 9.54°, length of mixer: 137 mm, length of extruded
portion: 50 mm
Placedmidwaytotheextrudedportionofthefootpieceandanchorplate.No.of
injectionport:6,diameterofinjectionport: 11 mm
Conclusions
1. A volumetric receiver intended for use in a s-CO2 Brayton cycle has been
simulated using a numerical model using the Finite Element Analysis CFD
FLUID FLOW.
2. The effect of mass flow rate and geometric parameters on the receiver
efficiency and peak temperatures has been investigated.
3. The participation of s-CO2 in radiative heat transfer is an important factor
in determining the peak temperatures in the receiver.
4. Design of a test loop that is intended to confirm the viability of the
presented receiver concept and experimentally validate the CFD
predictions is described.