History Of The Arab-Israeli Conflict In 40 Characters

History Of The Arab-Israeli Conflict
The Arab–Israeli conflict began in 1948, when the British Mandate over Palestine ended. Resulting
in the proclamation that established the Jewish state in Eretz Israel. The conflict was a struggle
between the Jewish state or Israel and the Arabs of the Middle East concerning the territory and
control over Palestine. The geographical area and political status of Palestine has changed
dramatically over the years, but the region as always been considered Holy Land. This Holy Land is
sacred among the Jews, Christians, and Muslims. During the twentieth century, Palestine has been
the object of conflicting claims and beliefs of both Arab and Jewish national movements. Resulting
in violence, and open warfare opposing Israel's existence. The Arab nations initiated four wars
against Israel since the beginning of the conflict. These wars were both complex and focused on the
political, strategic, and economic interests. These wars include the War of Independence in 1948, the
Sinai War in 1956, the Six Day War in 1967, and the Yom Kippur War in 1973. As Israel fought
against the Arab nations, they succeeded in each time. The conflicts between Arab and Israeli are in
relation to the political tensions, military conflicts, and the many disputes between Arab countries
and Israel, such as land and existence.
An overview of history for the Arab–Israeli conflict, the War of Independence in 1948 began
immediately upon the British withdrawal. Many researchers and historians divide the war
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Camp David Accords Research Paper
In 1978, the Egyptian President Anwar El–Sadat and the Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin
signed the Camp David Accords. The signing of the accords was followed by a formal peace treaty
between Israel and Egypt in March of 1979. Both the Israeli and Egyptian took significant risks and
while many parties seemed to favor the peace deal, there were still segments of the society which
either were skeptical or disapproved. Most notably, a group of Arab leaders known as the
"Steadfastness Front" attempted to oppose the deal and considered Sadat's actions as traitorous.
(Central Intelligence Agency) Sadat was also met with strong movements against him following the
announcement of the deal from his own people, and he was assassinated in 1981. Sadat risked much
on the possibility of peace between their people, a peace that has managed to persist to this day, ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The history of modern Egypt begins with the decline of the Ottoman Empire and the interference of
the French and British in 1798. Following the British claim of South Africa, a move designed to
stop French access to East Asia, Napoleon was directed to take control of Egypt with the intention
of building a canal to circumvent British South Africa. While the French conquest of Egypt was
unsuccessful, it did result in Muhammad Ali's assignment by the Ottoman Sultan to the region. Ali
established himself and over the course of the early 1800s managed to carve out a significant
standing in Egypt and implemented many reforms that helped to push Egypt ahead of much of the
Ottoman Empire as the Suez Canal brought money and western influence into the region. By 1882,
the British had taken control of Egypt from the Ottomans, with their focus on protecting the canal.
However, rising Arab nationalism prompted the British to grant independence in 1922–establishing
the Kingdom of Egypt which existed until

Israel Conflict Research Paper
The primary parties involved in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict are the Israelis and the Palestinians
but almost all Arab countries have contributed to the problem, as well.
The region as the heart of the conflict is the area formally known as Palestine. It now is Israel, Gaza,
and the West Bank.
Jewish Israelis claim ownership of the land because they need a place that is safe from all the
hostility from Arabs towards Jewish people. They also believe that they were promised this land by
God. The Palestinians (Arabs) say it belongs to them because their ancestors have lived there for
hundreds of years.
Israel is a country in the Middle East and is the home of the Jewish Israelis. It was founded on May
14, 1948 by David Ben–Gurion, who ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During his time as Prime Minister he led Israel towards peace with their Arab neighbors. Rabin,
along with Israeli foreign minister, Shimon Peres, and PLO leader Yasser Arafat, were awarded the
Nobel Peace Prize in 1994 for their joint efforts at ending the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.
Bill Clinton: U.S. President, who in 2000 convened a peace summit between Palestinian President
Yasser Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. At that time Israel offered Palestinians 66% of
the West Bank for a Palestinian homeland. Unfortunately Ehud Barak was defeated in the next
election and violence between Israel and the Palestinians continued.
Shimon Peres: In 1994, Shimon Peres, then foreign minister of Israel, along with Palestinian
President Yasser Arafat and Israeli President Yitzhak Rabin, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for
his contribution to stopping the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. He also had peace talks with the King of
Jordan in an attempt to end the conflict. He also became Prime Minister for a short time after the
assassination of Yitzhak Rabin in 1995. He was elected President of Israel again in

Homor Language And Its Benefits Of Humor And Language
Humor and Language Humor is elusive, inexplicable phenomena, often the best medicine for our
psychological problems and issues. Humor language is rarely discussed; we will explore later on the
reasons why humor is avoided in schools, the types of humor and its benefits. At times we overlook
humor as an important element in teaching and using it as a tool to contribute to a positive
environment for learning, humor for some is considered to be synonyms of disorder and chaos. "I'm
not going to start telling jokes, it will lead to a complete loss of control" said my friend's teacher in
Lycée school. For others, lack of knowledge as to how one may use humor in his speech effectively
might prevent him from using his sense of humor. "I enjoy humor, but I don't know how to go about
using it, so I don't, I don't want ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The writer of the article Benefits of Humor (n.d), states that studies by Fabio Sala at the Hay Group
have shown that humor, when used skillfully, reduces hostility, improves morale, and helps to
communicate difficult messages. Other research done by three experts showed that humor makes the
target person want to listen more, makes the information more memorable, distracts the person from
thinking about counter–arguments and it builds rapport and liking of the humorist. Most
importantly, humor makes people healthier, on both physical and psychological level. Health wise, it
lowers the blood pressure, improves breathing and strengthens the immune system and exercises the
muscles. On the psychological base, humor distracts one from negative emotions, increases and
boosts the energy, and it just makes us feel better and more connected to others. As cited in this
article, "humor also breaks through barriers–laughter, can transcend age, race, gender and belief.
Therefore, humor is a great tool employed to get closer to others, and communicate in a more
friendly

An Essay About My Partner
"There is a concept in Egypt called hamdullah, which means 'thank God.' Even if you are poor, you
still thank God". It is a funny concept, to thank God when you are poor. It creates a sort of tension
within someone – why would anyone want to be poor? And more than that, why would anyone want
to thank God for being poor? This is one of the many ways that my partner, Nouran (Noonoo)
Ghannam has portrayed to me the tension that is so evident among young people in Cairo, Egypt.
Noonoo is 22 years old, graduated from the American University in Cairo with a degree in political
science, and lives in Cairo with her family. She lived in Cairo for her entire life, except when she
had to move to other countries around the Middle East for her ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even though her family may disagree with her political stances, she fosters discussion with them
and is able to make them think more critically and make better informed decisions by majoring in
political science. Second, I portray how her family's tension influences her internally, by strongly
aligning with Nasser but voting for the Muslim Brotherhood in the 2012 Elections – which she
participated in and thus helped move along the outcome. And third, I show how Noonoo tries to
separate her private life from her public life – creating more tension in wanting to be involved in
politics, but not allowing herself to pursue a career in it as well. Nouran has lived her whole live in
Cairo, except for the years when she moved around the Middle East to accommodate for her father's
job. She studied at the American University in Cairo and majored in political science. She still lives
with her family and loves going to the beach. It is important to recognize one of the first leaders of
Egypt, Nasser, when exploring the tensions that are prevalent in Egypt. Nasser regained control of
the Suez Canal, which was "previously under the control of [France and Britain]" in 1956.
Regaining the Suez Canal and nationalising it was a mark of his power, and he was thereafter an
influential figure in Egypt's history. As stated before, Noonoo strongly aligns with Nasser because
she is in awe of him for standing up to the colonial powers and fighting for the

The Egyptian Movie Industry Analysis
Egyptian Movie
The Egyptian movie industry is over one hundred years old putting into consideration it began in
1896. In January 1896, Promio, a Lumiere photographer, visited the country to create short films
and showed it showed the Egyptians. By 1908, the country had ten movie houses, three of them in
Alexandria and five in Cairo. As more Egyptians viewed the films, they started to become interested
in the art of filmmaking. The first Egyptian films by an Egyptian were made in 1912 by Abdel
Rahman Salheya after hiring outside technicians. In 1927, Layla became the first full length but
silent movie in the country. In the 1980s, film production in Egypt started decreasing. However, the
latest trend in the Egyptian movie industry seems to be giving it a bad name. In 2014, it was argued
that Egyptian films bore a close resemblance to those from Hollywood (Meky, 2014).
Rushdy Abaza was an Egyptian actor who was born in August 1926 and passed away in July 1980.
He is regarded as among the most charming actors that have appeared in Egyptian films. Adel
Adham is another famous Egyptian actor who was born in March 1928 and passed away in February
1996. He is remembered for portraying ambiguous and evil characters. Lobda Abdel Aziz is an
Egyptian actress who was born in Cairo, Egypt in 1935. She is married and has two daughters.
Nermin AL–Faqy is another Egyptian actress who was born in June 1972. Ash Atalla is an Egyptian
working as a British television producer. He has produced

How Did Sādāt's Decision To Make Peace With Israel
On September 17, 1978, Egypt and Israel signed the Camp David Accords, which led to a peace
treaty between the two countries. This was a pioneer, the first such treaty between Israel and one of
its Arab neighbors, in the ongoing search for peace in the Middle East. The Camp David Accords
happened between Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar el–Sādāt
with US president Jimmy Carter acting as the middle man. Sādāt and Begin were awarded the Nobel
Prize for Peace in 1978 for their contributions to the agreements. Sādāt, however, was assassinated
in October 1981 by a group of army officers who were angered, along with many other Egyptians,
by Sādāt's decision to make peace with Israel. Prior to his death, Sādāt

Egypt before Imperialism
Egypt before Imperialism
Egypt has one of the longest histories of any nation in the world. Written history of Egypt dates
back to about 5,000 years, the commencement of civilization. While there is divergence in relation
to Early Egyptian times, it is said that Egypt came to be around 3200 B.C., during the reign of a
king by the name of Menes and unified the northern and southern cities of Egypt into one
government. In 1675 B.C., Egypt was invaded by the Hyksos, people from the east, bringing along
the very first of chariots and horses ever to come across Egyptian soil. Approximately 175 years
later in 1500 B.C., the Egyptians had gotten rid of the Hyksos and driven them out. In 1375 B.C.,
Amenhotep IV had become the king of Egypt. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Egypt revolted in 1881 to put down the British, who occupied the country at the time. Although in
1914, Egypt was declared a British protectorate. Most of Britain's interest in Egypt was financial. So
they used the Suez Canal as a route to their other colony, India. Transportation was then shorter and
cheaper. This occurrence made Africa's port cities obsolete. A diamond mine was then discovered in
1870. At the time it was the home of the Boers. Britain then seized it from 1871 to 1877. The Boers
the revolted in 1881 and defeated the British and later were granted republic independence. This
loss compelled Britain to protect the Suez Canal but France then threatened to reroute the Nile
River. With the exception of the Suez Canal, Egypt would just be a large desert.
How Egypt Gained Independence
Furthermore, Egypt then gained its independence in 1922, it being granted by the British; but the
much of the British remained in the northern region of Egypt and in the duration of World War II,
Egypt and the Suez Canal were fundamental connections in the empire of Britain. A government
was then under king Farouk in 1936 but the government was very inefficient and corrupt. Egypt was
not very happy with Britain's control of the Suez Canal. In the year of 1952, army officers
commenced a revolution to overthrow King Farouk and in 1953 a republic was established in Egypt.
The leader of this revolution was Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser and became the

Camp David Accords Essay
The Camp David Accords were signed on September 17, 1978 at the presidential retreat Camp
David. It was a peace treaty between the two warring nations Israel and Egypt and was paired with a
shuffle in territory. U.S. president Jimmy Carter accompanied Israeli prime minister Menachem
Begin and Egyptian leader Anwar El Sadat for the negotiations. These events led to more interaction
with Egypt and Israel, paved the way for future diplomatic meetings, and contributed to a
psychological shift in Israel.
After the Camp David Accords were put into place, interaction between Egypt and Israel increased.
According to Continuum of Political Encyclopedia of the Middle East, both countries sent
ambassadors to increase conversation. Additionally, Egypt

Jimmy Carter's Foreign Policy Analysis
Before Jimmy Carter, President Gerald Ford had taken over the country in August of 1974 when
President Nixon had resigned the same year. As the first unelected president in United States history,
Ford offered an inflation to those who struggled with the economy and issued amnesty to Vietnam
draft dodgers. Pardon was given along with conditions to serve two years and pledge their
allegiance to the United States. But there had been economical issues and the energy crisis had taken
place. When Carter was running for president as a Democrat in 1976, a close race resulted in 55% of
electoral votes and 50% of popular vote. Then later in 1980 when running for a second term, Carter
only won 9.1% of the electoral vote and 41.01% of the popular vote. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This was an act to ensure people of the responsibilities of the Federal Power Commission, Federal
Energy Administration and other energy–related government programs into a single cabinet–level
department. "The responsibility for setting energy policy is now split among more than 50 different
agencies, departments, and bureaus in the Federal Government."It all started in 1942 when, the
United States started the Manhattan Project to develop the atomic bomb. It was under the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers supervision and then after the war in 1946, the Atomic Energy Commission was
created to control the progression of the project. It created structure in order to make a plan that
would help save energy and stop the energy crisis of 1970. This act called for an entirely new
department and it helped develop new energy technology, a central energy data collection and
analysis program, and nuclear weapons research, development and production as well. "The
impending crisis of energy shortages has brought about an unprecedented quick action by the
congress in establishing the new Department of Energy." This later created more jobs for
Americans, nearly 14,000 federal workers and 94,000 contract workers were at the Department and
its earning up to $30 billion annually. "At birth, the department has about 20,000 employees. Today,
it has 16,000 permanent employees and about 100,000

South East Asia, Africa, And Latin America
INTRODUCTION: As 2010 approached its ending, a previously unheard of global issue started
surfacing. All over the Middle East and parts of East Africa, a loud mantra could be heard
repeatedly in the air. The chant made its way through many countries, gathering more and more
followers as it travelled all around the Arab world. Social media sprung with constant chatter with a
certain phrase appearing almost everywhere: "The people want to topple the regime." Thousands of
fed up youth and their elders filled the streets, demanding political freedom and economic stability
from their unjust rulers. For many people, they didn't see it coming. Despite the fact that democracy
had been spreading across many areas of Europe, East Asia, Africa, and Latin America, many
Middle Eastern countries have been standing their grounds, refusing to change. Their leaders had
been in power for way too long to even consider a switch in politics that could risk their personal
gains. All across the Arab land, frustration and hostility filled the air as people started realizing how
long they have been dormant. It wasn't a surprise when someone finally decided to end the silence.
On December 17, 2010, Mohamed Bouazizi, a Tunisian fruit vendor, set himself on fire after having
his goods confiscated unjustly by a police officer. Just like a falling row of dominos, Bouazizi's
decision caused a chain reaction causing millions of angry Tunisians to take a stand, finally deciding
to face their corrupt

How Did The Yom Kippur War Changed Israel?
Since its establishment in 1948, Israel has been threatened with extinction from the hostile Arab
countries that border it. This has forced them to be cautious, prepared, and on alert. Immediately
after it gained statehood in 1948, they were attacked by five arab countries. Against all odds, they
managed to defeated their adversaries. Their independence was still not recognized. One war
changed this. The Yom Kippur war changed the way people looked at Israel, changed Israel's
military borders, and showed that Israel has a large military power. On October 6, 1973, Israel was
taken by surprise when both Egypt and Syria attacked from two different fronts. In 1973 on that day,
it was Yom Kippur, which is a holy day for all of Israel, which made it difficult for Israel to respond
immediately. At the time, Israel had control of the Sinai Peninsula, which before the 6 day war in
1967, belonged to Egypt. Before the war started, Egypt got a new leader, Anwar el–Sadat. He
wanted to take the Sinai back from Israel. On the same day, Syria was going to attack from the
North, to take back the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All three countries suffered high casualties, and gained or lost little land. All three countries could
be looked at as winners and losers. Israel is a winner because they defeated these huge armies and
gained peace, but also a loser because of heavy casualties and loss of most of their land. Although
Egypt suffered the most from this war, they could still be looked at as a winner because of the gain
of the Sinai and peace with Israel, but a loser as well because of losing the war and heavy casualties.
Syria is a winner because they gained the land they were looking to gain, but also a loser because of
losing the overall war and heavy casualties. Everyone had a Pyrrhic victory. In the end though, The
Yom Kippur war changed the way people looked at Israel, changed Israel's military borders, and
showed that Israel has a large military

Ap World History Dbq Essay
The countries of South America, Africa, and Asia were under the shadow of the more powerful
European and American countries before and during the World Wars. Before the wars European
nations colonized other countries such as Asia, South America, and especially Africa. It was a means
for European countries to advance their global power. Meanwhile, the Africans and other native
people, had been treated as weak and disrespectable, hurting African, Asian, and South American
pride. After WWII, the countries each tried to gain independence from their European leaders, and
as they did so, some of the new leaders envisioned unity, such as the pan–African vision. The desire
for unity was commonly motivated by a longing for significant world power along

Camp David Accords Essay
Former President Jimmy Carter is frequently referred to as a champion of human rights. While his
presidency is deemed mostly unsuccessful in handling domestic affairs, such as unemployment and
a sharp increase of inflation, Carter is well respected for his attempts to negotiate peace across the
world. One of his better–known attempts is the Camp David Accords, in which Carter brought
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar El Sadat together to discuss
peace between the two nations. While most Americans see the Camp David Accords as progress
toward peace, Arab leaders felt the opposite.
In an effort to establish himself and his knowledge with international affairs, Carter immersed
himself in learning about the Middle East and did a tour in 1973 through Israel, Palestine, Egypt,
and Syria. Before the Camp David Accords, the situation between Israel and every other Middle
Eastern country was delicate and heightened by constant guerilla attacks back and forth. While
Israel had Western support, their successive militant governments established settlements along the
Jordan River as well as military occupation throughout the West Bank and Gaza Strip pushing
Palestinian refugees into Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and the edge of the Gaza Strip. While occupying
Palestinian lands in 1967, the United Nations issued Resolution 242 calling for Israel to withdrawal
from lands acquired by war and work toward peace as well as settling the refugee problem.

Yom Kippur Research Paper
On October 6, 1973, Egyptian and Syrian forces launched an attack on Israel to try and regain some
of the territories that they lost during the Six Day War in 1967. The two Arab nations attacked when
the Jewish people would be most vulnerable, Yom Kippur, also known as the holiest day in the
Jewish religion. Because the Jewish people were busy celebrating their holiday, the Egyptian troops
were able to take them by surprise and swept right through the Sinai Peninsula. However, Syria was
having problems trying to get the Israeli troops out of the Golan Heights and taking over. They
eventually did, but the Israelis launched a counterattack and were able to recapture the Golan
Heights. Just two and a half weeks later, there was a cease–fire that

The War Of The Middle East And North Africa
From the inception of the Arab Spring in Tunisia to the most recent round of insurrection in Yemen,
vulnerable states in the Middle East and North Africa have undergone waves of debilitating conflict.
The chain of events that rapidly spread the revolutionary sentiment from capital to capital was not
expected, and surprised the world. Ostensibly bloodless coups intermixed with violent rebellion and
created a new Middle East and North Africa. The largest, and arguably most important country
embroiled in the rash of regime change is Egypt. Egypt is the center of gravity of the North African
states, and has been a strategic ally of the United States since 1975. The recent conflict in Egypt was
preceded by years of corrupt authoritarian rule and increasing levels of poverty and lack of
opportunity, which ultimately led to untenable levels of frustration within the Egyptian polity. The
conflict participants: President Hosni Mubarak and his National Democrat Party (NDP); the semi–
autonomous military establishment; the protesters; and the Islamists (Muslim Brotherhood) clashed
together in a battle of wills which ultimately deposed Mubarak and the successive Islamist regime
and led to another round of elections. Apart from the inertial forces of revolution playing upon the
state of Egypt by her neighbors, Egypt had significant domestic social issues which factionalized
and provoked the people to protest in the streets. Primary factors which led to the call for change
were

Yom Kippur War Research Paper
The Yom Kippur War The Yom Kippur War of 1973, was a very controversial event that took many
countries by surprise. Beginning on the day of Yom Kippur, a day of fasting for the Muslims, the
Israelis were taken by surprise as the Egyptians and Syrians backed by the Russians started
attacking them from both the west and the northeast (Loyola). This caused a dilemma for the United
States, because they were afraid that if they tried to help the Israelis they would end up in a war with
Russia. Though it only lasted for twenty–four days, it was a very eye opening situation for the
Israelis. On October 6th, 1973 the Egyptians and Syrians, backed by the Russians, attacked Israel
from the west and northeastern corners of Israel essentially trapping ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Since the Israelis had easily defeated the Egyptians in the Six–Day war, they had been apathetic,
when filling their defence posts with troops, so it was fairly easy for the Egyptians and Syrians to
make it into Israel and begin fighting (Browne). Sadat had so carefully planned the crossing of the
canal that in 24 hours, he had only lost 208 men which meant that he would still have a good army
to carry on the rest of the war(Browne). On October 25 1973, after much fighting and a large regain
of land, Sadat called an end to the war as he saw that he would not be able to keep his position for
much longer. The Yom kippur war of 1973 was a short but powerful war that proved to the Israelis
that the Egyptians are stronger than once perceived to be. Although Sadat did not regain all of the
territory that was lost during the Six–Day war, he got his point across to the Israelis that he is able to
put up a good fight against them. The Yom Kippur war not only shook the confidence of the Israeli
government, but also led to a peace treaty between the arabs and the Israelis(Browne). This was just
one step towards peace in the Middle East, but it could eventually help to end all disagreement in
the Middle

Menachem Wolfovitch Begin Research Paper
Menachem Wolfovitch Begin was born on August 16, 1913 in Brest–Litovsk, Poland. He was prime
minister of Israel from 1977 to 1983. As a teenager, he was a part of the youth Zionist Revisionist
movement, Betar, and at the age of 25, he became the leader of it. Later on, Russian authorities
arrested Begin for being a Zionist and sent him to a Siberian labor camp because they believed him
to be a "dangerous individual". He was released in 1941 via an agreement between the Soviet Union
and the Polish government, an agreement that also freed 1.5 million Poles. When World War II
broke out, Begin was one of the 1,000 illegal immigrants that tried to cross the Romanian border on
their way to Palestine. Unfortunately, the plan failed and Begin had ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During this time, he bought weapons and explosives from Arab countries, an action that his allies
greatly disagreed on. They believed that the weapons should have been acquired a different way.
The buying of explosives and weapons from Arabs also caused British authorities to put a $50,000
bounty on the "grim–faced, bespectacled Menachem Begin('s)" head. After Begin left the Irgun, he
started a new party called the "Freedom Party founded by the National Military Organization,"
better known as Herut. He led his party for twenty–nine years in the Opposition. In that time, the
party grew greatly, in the ninth Knesset specifically. In 1977, Begin became prime minister in Israel
until 1983. During that time, he negotiated a peace treaty with Egyptian President Anwar El–Sadat,
and because of this he was a co–recipient, with Egyptian President Anwar El–Sadat, of the 1978
Nobel Prize for Peace. Begin also formed another coalition government after the 1981 general
election. In June 1882, Begin ordered an attack on Lebanon, seeing it as a rescue mission for the
people of Israel. This attack would later be known as the Begin Doctrine, and resulted in the deaths
of about 800 civilians. Due to lack of public support, Israel forces were forced to leave Lebanon.
This event turned the world's view of Israel and Begin around, making it negative and be rather
against the Jewish country and its

Egyptian Society: Traditional Middle Eastern Values...
Egyptian Society: Traditional Middle Eastern Values Blended with Western Beliefs
Amongst the turbid and dysfunction that is the Middle East lies the nation of Egypt. Egypt, a major
country of the Middle East, is habitually considered stereotypical of Middle Eastern civilization, but
further research guides one to the conclusion that Egypt is far from a generic Middle Eastern
country. Egypt has a strong tradition of nationalism that has been formed during its history, giving it
a national unity that is often non–existent in other Middle Eastern nations (1). This, as well as other
advantages that Egypt has gained during its past, has allowed it to rise above the problems plaguing
the rest of the Middle East and to form basically its ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For the most part, the assets of their private life did not play a role in their importance in the public
realm. All were equal in this realm. The two realms were thus completely separate of each other.
The present–day United States is noticeably different from that of ancient Greece. The difference is
basic: the private and public realms have merged to form one major realm, society (3). With this
new blended realm of society, one's personal life significantly impacts one's role in the public.
Better said, the private realm becomes public, able for all to view. This creates an unequal balance,
giving high authority to those with impressive wealth or other valuable assets in their private realm.
Arendt comments on the distortion of the public realm, which is now technically non–existent in the
social realm, when she says:
Being seen and being heard by others derive their significance from the fact that everybody sees and
hears from a different position. This is the meaning of public life, compared to which even the
richest and most satisfying family life can offer only the prolongation or multiplication of one's own
position with its attending aspects and perspectives. (4)
The best evidence to support this transition of realms is the disclosure of the most personal matters
of celebrities regularly discussed on a mass media forum. The two societies of Ancient Greece and
modern–day America are apparently so drastically different in comparison

Memoirs From The Women's Prison Summary
In Nawal El Saadawi's book, Memoirs from the Women's Prison, Dr. Saadawi speaks about her
experience within the women's prison system and the oppression that citizen, especially women face
within Egypt.
In her interview with Nawal Al Saadawi, she speaks about the political dynamic of Egypt's
governmental system. As she says, the fight for democracy cannot be done without the work for
women's rights as well. As women make up about half of the population, Dr. Saadawi says that the
freedom of democracy cannot be done without the work for women. She also speaks about her view
on feminism. As she is labeled as a Radical Feminist, she has a different definition then most have.
She believes that the definition of "radical feminism" needs to be change in all aspects of how
society is. This change needs to start with the constitution in Egypt to allow all members of society
to be equal, the way that women are oppressed within the family dynamics, to the social and
economic ways of how we run our political systems to favor men and those with power and
economic wealth. She also believes that the true liberation of Egypt needs ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Saadawi speaks about her time within the prison system. As she says, "The comparison between a
pistol and a pen and paper rang in my ears oddly, like a line from a farce. I thought I must be sitting
in a theatre. I had not imagined that pen and paper could be more dangerous than pistols in the
world of reality and fact." (49). This quote is one of the most important turning points within the
book. As she is speaking about the comparison of a pistol to the pen and paper. What she is speaking
about is how she did not realize the power of her activism and fight for human rights could be seen
as such a deadly weapon to country of Egypt. That instead of letting those who have information of
the misleading ways of the country, the president would rather silent those people then run the risk
of leak of the true

Introduce Artifact Essay
Introduce Artifact Bryant Arnold, an artist for Cartoonaday.com, illustrated how social media, i.e.
Twitter and Facebook, has influenced the Egyptian people. In this cartoon, the former President of
Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, is running away and hiding behind the military from three Egyptians, two
men and one women in traditional Egyptian dress, who are holding swords that say Facebook and
Twitter. During the Egyptian revolution of 2011, part of the Arab Spring, Egyptians were able to
connect and coordinate protests through these social media websites due to their common interest:
the distaste of Mubarak and the Egyptian government and its policies. The swords with Facebook
and Twitter on them represents how the Egyptians were able to fight ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Although he survived his attempted assassinations, he still faced a lot of difficulty being the
president as many Egyptians were against his ruling. The Egyptian Revolution of 2011 began in
January consisting of many protests against Mubarak's regime. Although, he promised to not run in
the presidential elections in the following September, many protesters were still unhappy. As the
demonstrations continued, they became more violent between anti–Mubarak and pro–Mubarak
supporters, to which on February 10, 2011 Mubarak resigned as president of Egypt
(bibliography.com). The protesters Mubarak is seen running away from in the cartoon are the
protestors of the Egyptian Revolution of 2011. He is shown as running away since he didn't stand up
and fight against the protesters, but took the easy way out and resigned.
Military protecting Mubarak
Bryant Arnold's political cartoon depicts the Egyptian military as guarding President Mubarak.
Since Mubarak was president of Egypt, he was given the responsibility of being the "supreme
commander of the military" (Karon). Not only was Mubarak an eventual military leader, but before
he became president he served several years in the Air Force, with the height of his military career
being Commander of the Air Force. After being elected president, Mubarak then took his place as
the leader of Egypt's military. As the commander of Egypt's military Mubarak was

Oil Has Been Used By Domestic And Foreign Governments On...
CADET NAME_Clara Lund_________ SECTION/HOUR _4/D_____
BLOCK III ESSAY QUESTION CHOSEN : ___ #1___
BEGIN ESSAY BELOW:
–
Oil has been used by domestic and foreign governments in the development of the Middle East both
domestically and in foreign policy since 1940 by using it as a bartering item because it is such a
valid and precious resource that can fuel homes, towns, and countries. The Middle East has had
many ups and downs throughout its development as a country, but its abundant supply of oil made it
a country that outsiders wanted to either friend or control. The D'Arcy Concession in the early
1900's were rights created for the people of the D'Arcy, to search and dig for oil within Iran. When
given this opportunity they found ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There was no competition to lower their asking price. Soon to follow in the mid 1970's, was an oil
embargo. This embargo presented the first oil shock. Immediately OAPEC proclaimed the embargo.
Anwar el–Sadat, the third president of Egypt played a role during this time. He reigned from 1970
until the early 1980's. As a member of the free officers who overthrew King Farouk in an Egyptian
revolution during the 1950's, Anwar el–Sadat reinstituted a multiparty system creating a domino
effect leading to the October war. All Palestinian efforts were abandoned, and he was opposed by
PLO and the Muslim Brotherhood. This alienation also included him getting kicked out of the Arab
league which was in the early 1980's. This then resulted in the United States involvement in the
October War. As retaliation to the OAPEC the United Stated decided to supply those affected
unjustly by this embargo with arms. The October War is also known as the Yom Kippur war. The
countries mainly involved at this time were Israel, Egypt and Syria, and Egypt had an additional end
goal to claim the Sinai Peninsula.
Though there were multiple conflicts in the fight to gain power of the oil in the Middle East this
helped to strengthen the Middle East. It turned their country from being seen as a stereotypical dried
up desert to being seen as a rich and prosperous advantage to those in alliance with it. Oil provided
the Middle East to have a voice in trading systems. Everyone needed oil

The Palestine Of The Ottoman Empire
Since the end of Hitler's Regime in Germany, many Jews have felt displaced and felt like they had
lost all of their pride and dignity. The British who had control over Palestine from the fall of the
Ottoman Empire had declared in 1947 that the land of Palestine would be established as the national
home of the Jews. The Jews who had stayed in Palestine had halfheartedly accepted the terms even
though it had meant that they would not be given the whole of the land as a state for the Jews.
Which had then led to many clashes between Jews, who had lived there and those who had
emigrated, and the Palestinian Arabs, who had roots from the beginning of the Ottoman Empire.
Since the end of World War II, the state of affairs between the Arabs and Israelis have been a topic
of discussions for many fields of study. In 1947, the state of Israel was created by the means of a
Partition Plan created by the UN Security Council that had given three zones, each to both the
Palestinians and Israelis but has since then led to many conflicts throughout the years. Conflicts that
not only include the history of the land, but of who has the right to settle on the land where the three
Abrahamic religions, all share history.1 While many of the Arab nations did not fully accept the
agreements of the creation of the state of Israel, it was the Jew who settled on that land that were the
least satisfied due to losing the full rights to the 'promise land'. It was through that dissatisfaction
that many Jews

The United States And The Middle East
For much of the United States' history, affairs in the Middle East have been an important focus. A
more recent example is President Barack Obama attempting to deal with the terrorist organization,
ISIS, because they are threatening the security of American allies. In the past, multiple other
presidents have intervened in Middle Eastern affairs because they believe that doing so would be in
the best interest of the United States. The importance of Middle Eastern affairs to the United States
during the 1960s through the 1980s is apparent with President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger's
diplomacy tactics to prevent Arab–Israeli war and lift the Arab oil embargo, President Jimmy
Carter's peace negotiations during the Camp David Accords, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Edward Sheehan, the author of "How Kissinger Did It: Step by Step in the Middle East," explains
that "...Kissinger accepted and in fact helped to promote the conventional strategic wisdom of the
first Nixon administration that...a strong Israel militarily, much superior to its Arab foes, would
prevent war and serve as the surest sentinel of American interests in the Middle East" (8–9). The
advantage of a strong Israeli military encouraged the United States to consistently support Israel.
The Arab countries did not take this favoritism very lightly. An oil embargo was placed on the
United States and that would prove to be economically disastrous. Because of the their huge reliance
on oil, "the United States was especially hard–hit by the OPEC embargo, which was directed toward
all supporters of Israel in its latest military conflict against neighboring Arab countries" (Hook 340).
A major reason why the United States is so invested in some areas of the Middle East is due to their
oil production. This encourages the United States to maintain healthy relationships in that region.
Henry Kissinger also worked to improve United States' relationship with Egypt through diplomacy.
He created a set of rules for the United States to follow when dealing with Arab countries. In fact,
"The policy was based on a quasi–alliance between Washington and Cairo–or more particularly,
upon friendship between Kissinger and Egyptian President Anwar el– Sadat.

Interrupted Yom Kippr
The War That Interrupted Yom Kippur The 1973 Arab–Israeli war (known in Israel as Yom Kippur
War) was a battle between Israel and numerous Arab countries. Israel, way smaller in numbers was
celebrating one of their main holidays, Yom Kippur. Arab troops came swarming in and Israel had
no idea it was coming. After about 20 days, Israel won the war, but it came with heavy casualties
(From the War of Attrition to the 1973 Arab–Israeli War). Six years earlier, in 1967, Israel had
embarrassed the Arabs in the Six Day War. After the war, Israel had four times the amount of land as
they did before. They took territory from Egypt including the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip,
they took the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, and Syria lost the Golan Heights. In 1970,
Anwar el–Sadat became president of Egypt. He wanted peace with Israel, but after the war in 1967,
it was unlikely that Israel would do anything to favor Egypt. Sadat decided to attack Israel, and no
matter the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Israelis criticized the government because of their lack of preparedness. The next year, in April
1974, Israel's prime minister, Golda Meir, stepped down. Even though Egypt had suffered another
defeat, they received what they wanted. In 1982, the peace treaty was signed and Egypt received the
last part of the Sinai Peninsula. Syria, on the other hand, was not as lucky. The Egyptian–Israeli
cease–fire gave Syria the defeat and Israel gained more territory in the Golan Heights (Yom Kippur
War: Aftermath). The war between Israel and the surrounding Arab countries did not even last a
month, but a lot went on in it. Many countries got involved, but there was not much land that was
gained. Egypt and Israel decided to get a peace agreement and Egypt actually received some land
from it. Syria joined Egypt in the war, but they were not as lucky as Egypt. Israel may have been
smaller than most, but their military was

Ali Mohamed Research Paper
Ali Mohamed – The Super Spy It is common knowledge that spies have been around since the
beginning of time. Spies come in many shapes and sizes, their modus operandi and motivations vary
from case to case. Throughout its history, many people believed the US intelligence apparatus was
impregnable. American intelligence officers never suspected a spy from a terrorist organization
could penetrate their agencies. This is the story of top tier Al–Qaeda (AQI) spy, Ali Mohamed, and
how he infiltrated the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
and Green Berets. On June 3, 1952, Ali Abdelseoud Mohamed was born in Kafr El Sheikh, Lower
Egypt. His father served as a career Soldier in the Egyptian Army, and was a ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Mohamed attended public schools and graduated in 1970. He then attended the Cairo Military
Academy. He was a good student and went on to attend university near his hometown. He obtained
two bachelor's degrees and a master's degree in psychology from the University of Alexandria
(Combating Terrorism Center, 2008). Mohamed joined the Egyptian Army in 1970 and quickly
advanced through the ranks while serving in the Intelligence Branch and then Special Forces (SF) as
a Major. Mohamed was well known as an intelligent officer within the Egyptian Army as he was
highly educated, and spoke several languages. Mohamed's intellect led the Egyptian Army to send
him to the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center (JFKSWC) at Ft. Bragg, NC to participate in the
Officer Exchange Program. During the program, foreign officers trained next to U.S. officers to

Egypt : Mystery Of The Nile
Egypt: Mystery of the Nile Egypt is home to one of the first civilizations in the world. This early
society, known as Ancient Egypt, was also one of the longest, starting in 3000 BC and lasting nearly
3000 years. During this period, the nation thrived as its culture became renowned for everything
from the splendor of its arts, advancements in science, technology and architecture, to its traditions
in religion. Their superior achievements, which include the Great Pyramids, military conquests, and
mathematical system left a cultural legacy that influenced many other ancient civilizations. Egypt's
rich history led to the creation of its own study of Egyptology as archeologists and historians
continue to discover its mysteries. Egypt can be divided into four natural regions: the Nile Valley
and Nile Delta, the Western Desert, the Eastern Desert, and the Sinai Peninsula (Goldschmidt,
2016). While most of the country is arid, the Nile River divides the two deserts and gives life to the
harsh conditions of the Sahara. Less than one tenth of the country is settled or cultivated. The ten
percent that is populated borders the Nile or is scattered throughout the northeast region, Sinai. After
the great days of the Ancient Egypt era, Egypt would succumb to foreign powers. In 525 BC the
Persians conquered Egypt and ruled until 332 BC as Alexander the Great stretched his Macedonian
empire. Goldschmidt (2008) notes that Alexander as a great fighter and military strategist

The Between Islam And The Middle East
Some scholars are arguing about the contradiction between Islam and Democracy while others say
that there is no official decisive evidence in the main Islamic scripts. According the Islam the leader
(khalifa) of the country or nation should be chosen by the people, but there is no clear method for
re–elect after a period of time which make it a hesitation point in Islamic ideology. Others think that
all these issues should be taken from the modern books where the movement of society needs are
more applicable toward the new generation and the first world. However, the Middle East has a
different story in the process of democratizing and still have a long way through since it has both
Islam, Christianity, Jewish and other ethnic groups which make it more complicated in term of
dealing with the process toward the democracy. The Arabic world has big range of counties which
have many similarities, but also many differences, therefore we will focus on the African region in
particular Egypt and Tunisia. At the beginning of the 20 century Egypt was controlled and mandated
by the British where they had a big interest in Egypt since it was the main gate toward Africa. There
were a couple of movements from the Egyptian to take their freedom and decolonise but they
haven't get their independent until 1952. However this wasn't a complete independent as in many
parts Egypt was linked economically with the Great Britain. The Suez Canal crises occurred because
the British refused to give

History Of Hosni Mubarak 's Regime
Introduction
Hosni Mubarak's regime in Egypt had been the only government the Egyptian people had seen in
decades. Following movements such as The Kifaya (Enough) Movement, and The April 6 Youth
Movement, as well as the demonstrations in Tahrar square, Mubarak resigned and regime change
was not far behind. After his resignation and a promising push towards democratization with the
first democratically elected head of state, Mohamed Morsi, Abdel Fattah el–Sisi took office, proving
that Egypt is not working towards a democratic state, but rather pushing for an oppressive
authoritarian regime that takes after Mubarak, Sadat and Nasser's militarized Egypt. The
deterioration of human rights and the state of the economy prove that regime change in Egypt has
not pushed for democratization.
Mubarak's Regime
Hosni Mubarak's presidency began in 1981 and ended in 2011 with general discontent among the
Egyptian people. During his presidency, Mubarak implemented economic plans that contributed to
Egypt's preexisting economic crisis. Mubarak's predecessor, Anwar Sadat implemented Infitah, an
economic plan that "involved attracting foreign capital and technology, financial institutions, and
freeing up the labor markets." While this economic plan came with good intentions, it did not fare
well, as it caused lopsided growth of the economy. "The gap between exports and imports had to be
financed by extra borrowing." Thus, Egypt's economy suffered, and the country was forced into
debt. To

The Difficult Foreign Policy Issues Faced by Late...
The 20th century consisted of many difficult and controversial foreign policy decisions. From
President Jimmy Carter, elected in 1977, to President Ronald Regan elected in 1981. Carter
attempted at peacemaking efforts to help bring stability to the Middle East, but faced the challenge
of the Iran Hostage Crisis in 1979. He shaped his foreign policy through integrity, morality, and
honest, to bring trust in the government to the American citizens as the previous president, Richard
Nixon made the people lost their trust in the government. Ronald Regan supported a conservative
foreign policy and greatly increased military spending, putting the United States in huge deficit.
Ronald Regan is also given credit for the end of the Cold War, and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This was considered his biggest foreign policy crisis, and damaged his presidency, as he was
considered to handle the situation inappropriately. Carter also made attempts to improve relations
with the Soviet Union, but instead exacerbated the situation, and Carter's commitment to human
rights divided the United States and the Soviet Union further. Matters worsened when Carter tried to
pass SALT II, limiting weapons further then set by SALT I.
Ronald Regan, elected in 1981, took a tough stand on communism, and is credited for the downfall
of communism and the Soviet Union. As the polish government cracked down on Solidarity, an
independent labor party, Regan abandoned the policy on détente, and "called for economic sanctions
to force the communist–backed government to end martial law." Regan's foreign policy also called
aid to Latin America, as he feared communism would take over their weak economy. Aid was also
sent to the Middle East as religious conflicts threatened the already unsound region. In 1984
however, Regan withdrew the American forces, admitting the attempt a failure. Terrorism also
played a role in shaping Regan's policy as Terrorism continued on its rise, raising global concern.
Regan ran for a second term and won the election of 1984. He then reshaped his foreign policy to
accommodate the changes of the Soviet Union. In 1985, a new leader emerged in the Soviet Union,
Mikhail

The Decentralization Of Chicago
"The definition of the "Middle East" as a category, is very much dependent of the existence of a
"West"" (Alsayyad, 2011). What defines the term western and what makes a populace considered
western? The term "western" derives from the idea of European modernization, from cities such as
London or Paris. Under this modernization the cities adapted to new technologies, such as
transportation and road systems. Western culture was introduced; culture referring to "that complex
while which includes knowledge, belief, art, law, morals, customs, and other capabilities and habits
acquired by a person as a member of society" (Edward B Taylor, Anthropologist). Foreign capital,
through tourism and investors, began to appear in these cities. Foreign ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He developed a new master plan of Cairo, which would connect all of the satellite communities with
a ring road, which would give the citizens of Cairo the opportunity to become closer. Under
Mubarak's presidency, the informal settlements continued to grow. Even though they were illegal
and non–code compliant, the government did not demolish or evict the residents because the
informal settlements are some of the only means of affordable housing for some members of Cairo's
community. By the end of the 20th century 50% of Cairo's infrastructure consisted of informal
housing settlements. This has lead to Cairo becoming known as the Informal City, more so than any
other city of the same kind. These informal settlements had always been present in one way or
another, but their growth was linked to the dismantling of the public sector under president Sadat,
and the globalization of Cairo, which can also be seen in many other cities in the Middle East. With
the rise of the number of informal communities, or ashwaiyyat, in Cairo, Mubarak took great
interest in their communities and started to improve the conditions of the by improving and
providing more public

Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Non Violence Methods
All religions called for nonviolent principles that are based on peaceful strategies to reach goals.
Nonviolence seeks understanding and justice instead of riot or tumult. In fact, the first time for
someone to use this method was in India by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (1869–1948), he
believed that he can stand against the British and bring independence to India using civil
disobedience. Also, Anwar El Sadat used the non violence method with Israel when he signed the "
peace" agreement in order to avoid a war. Therefor, the non violence technique is very effective
which lead Luther king Jr. to call upon Gandhi's method and make use of it to attain equality
between black and white people. In my opinion, applying the non violence method is truly

Government and Politics
No Peace for the Middle East
Since its inception the State of Israel has been at war with the Arab countries surrounding it. Dating
back to biblical times when the Israelites left Egypt after two hundred years of bondage there, they
began forty years of wandering the desert in which they encountered many enemy tribes such as
their sworn enemies, the Amalekites. Thousands of years later, the Arabs and Israelis are still
fighting. The State of Israel began with the War for Israeli Independence in 1948. Israel has kept on
fighting ever since. Over the lengthy span of time in which Israel has been at war with the Arabs,
the people of Israel and the Palestinians have developed a deeply rooted hatred for one another.
Terrorism has been ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In December of 1988 Yasir Arafat recognized the right of The State of Israel to exist (Friedman
XIV). Not long after, talks of peace between the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and The
State of Israel ensued. In September of 1993 the Arab – Israeli conflict took a sudden twist. Yitzhak
Rabin (Prime Minister of Israel at the time) and Yasir Arafat (leader of the PLO) flew to Washington
D.C. for the signing of an historic peace accord in conjunction with President William Jefferson
Clinton. This was just the beginning of Israeli – Arab peace talks for years to come. In July of 1994
Rabin signed a treaty with King Hussein of Jordan. This treaty declared peace between the two
countries as well as set the foundation for economic collaboration (Encarta "Middle East?. Peace
talks are still going on now between the Arabs and Israelis.
Aside from political peace, there are a few organizations which promote Arab – Israeli melding
within the younger generations. There is one program that takes children of both cultures to
Massachusetts to practice classical music. Through art, music, sports, and other hobbies, children of
the two cultures are coming together and attempting to form a common bond (Israeli Embassy
Pamphlet 7). All of these various methods of peace have been made possible by the technological
advances of the past century. With improved communications we have been able to bridge the gap
between nations. Wars and hatred came about from

African American Imperialism Research Paper
The Merriam Webster dictionary defines imperialism as, "A policy or practice by which a country
increases its power by gaining control over other areas of the world." During the nineteenth century,
European countries were seeking to expand their empires. They saw seizing control of African and
Asian territories as a means of strengthening their empires. The people of Africa and Asia had mixed
reaction to the idea of Westerners capturing their territory and instilling new ideologies. A majority
of Africans were against the idea of imperialism and did not want Europeans to capture their
territory. However, the Europeans were determined to capture African territory because they knew
the African continent had great potential. Initially, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his speech Sadat emphasized that Asia and Africa are now emancipated and will no longer
tolerate Westerners trespassing onto their property and exploiting their people. Sadat states, "But
before materializing as an historical event, it was an impression and an innate volition instinctively
developing in the mind of the colonized and the exploited–the human being whom imperialism had
reduced to a typified specimen of a subjugated specie and bondsman recognizable in every
colonized country" (1). That statement is an illustration of how the Asian and African people felt
about being imperialized by Westerners. The Asian and African people believed that they were
being exploited and did not want to be under the rule of Westerners. Hence, why they responded
with resistance and fought back against being imperialized by Westerners. The presence of
widespread imperialism across Africa gave rise to the idea of nationalism. African people wanted to
have their own independence and did not want to be oppressed by European empires. In the book
Documents in World History, Peter Stearns et al. states, "Nationalism was one of the crucial,
although unintended, products of European imperialism. Local Leaders, particularly aspiring
newcomers often exposed to European education, saw the importance of nationalism in the Western
society and used it as a vehicle for protesting colonial controls and demanding independence" (329).
That statement is an indication that African people resented imperialism. They were aware that
nationalism and independence were crucial in Western societies and were not open to the idea of
accepting imperialism. So, the African people were resilient in the fight to overthrow their imperial
masters. As some of the African people became exposed to Western

Arab Israeli Conflict Dbq
The Arab Israeli conflict is one of the major dilemmas in the world in the modern history. Many
political leaders assume that this is the most complicated conflict around the world, even bigger than
Cold War. During the 1960's and the 1970's, the Arab world decided to go with confrontation and
fight fire with fire. The Middle East became a war zone where all the Arab countries lined up to win
back Palestine. However, the Israeli cabinet was smart enough to maintain their presence in the
Palestinian Land. Nevertheless, many Arabic Leaders did not manage the war against Israel
vigorously.
There were many other reasons that caused the tense relationship between Nasser and the western
powers. However the Arab– Israeli conflict was the biggest ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The declaration was written by the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour. The
declaration was directed to the Zionist community where it stated:
His Majesty's government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the
Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being
clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non–Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in
any other country.
This declaration triggered the hatred of the Arabs towards the Jewish people, ringing the bells of an
unending war. This shows that Britain was the biggest ally of the Jewish state during the early 20th
century.
Soon the USA was able to substitute the British role. After WWII, the Jewish society were able to
deliver the tragedy that took place in Germany; they were able to influence the ultimate powers in
the world, convening them that the Nazis tortured the Jewish people and burned them down to death
during the Holocaust. Therefore the Jewish people were able to gain the sympathy of all Europe and
the USA. The Jews were really clever in utilizing this event to sustain Palestine. They convinced the
world that they are the population that was labored throughout history; and all they are asking for is
to live peacefully in their holly land. Furthermore, many of the six

Globalisation And Globalization
At the apex of the Nile's waterways, an area that has been inhabited since the time of the Ancient
Egyptians, is where Egypt's capital city, Cairo, is situated. Being at the administrative forefront of
the nation's wealth and population, Cairo holds more control over Egypt's economic, political, and
social workings than any other city in the country. Being the business and social hub of the country,
Cairo also boasts millions of residents. As a result of being so densely populated, Cairo faces the
increasing concern of expanding slums and informal housing in poorer districts of the city. With the
populations in these more impoverished communities increasing at an exponential rate, these areas
are getting left behind in the city's efforts to maintain and improve problems with transportation,
sewage, garbage collection, and access to fresh water. These slums are a significant point of
inequality in Cairo, and the people of these informal housing districts face many challenges of
finding adequate residences, losing their jobs to privatization, and a government more focused on
globalizing rather than considering the issues of the poor. The effects of globalization are driving the
people of the informal housing districts further into poverty and state of inequality in comparison to
the rest of the urban population living in Cairo. To begin, it is essential to understand the history of
the region and the process of how such informal settlements came to take up land in and

Jimmy Carter's Middle East Peace Summit
Middle East Peace Summit–Analysis of President Jimmy Carter
Former United States President Jimmy Carter has been influential in the Arab–Israeli peace process
for many decades. His involvement began with brokering the Camp David Accords during his
Presidency. His efforts to "wage peace" have continued through the founding of the Carter Center
and been recognized through the winning of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize. At the time, many world
leaders, including Carter, believed that unrest in the Middle East could lead to a war between the
superpowers. In 1978, President Carter invited Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and
Egyptian President Anwar el–Sadat to the presidential retreat in Camp David, Maryland. Carter's
advisers suggested he attempt only to create a general outline for a peace treaty; he responded they
were aiming too low and set the minimum goal as talking out a peace treaty between Egypt and
Israel. Carter said: "...by getting them to Camp David, away from the press and out of the glare of
publicity and away from their own political constituencies, I think I can bring them to understand
each other's positions better." ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once at Camp David, Begin and Sadat argued for days about wars which took place before Carter
took office. Carter then separated the two, going back and forth between Begin and Sadat,
attempting to broker a peace plan. After thirteen days, these efforts brought about the Camp David
Accords and peace between Egypt and Israel. Under the terms of the plan, Egypt regained control of
the Sinai Peninsula and the Suez Canal from Israel and monetary support from the U.S. to
modernize the Egyptian military. In return, the Egyptians agreed to recognize Israel as a sovereign

Menachem Begin Influence
Menachem Begin, the prime minister of Israel, changed Israel because he made peace with Anwar
el–Sadat, sacrificed the Sinai Peninsula, and shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Egyptian President,
Anwar el–Sadat. Before he became prime minister, he was a serious zionist, or someone who
supports the movement of the recreation of a Jewish nation in Israel, and even joined a Zionist
Revisionists' youth movement, converting into their leader by the age of 25 years old. He even was
imprisoned for supporting the Zionist movement and being a Zionist.
In the beginning of his ministry, Menachem led Israel with political change and a new look by
signing a peace treaty. However, in order for him to prove that Israel was an actual country, he
needed to

How Did John Locke Impact Society
All the above people were of different backgrounds but could be seated at the same table because of
their diversity and interests. This can lead to interesting conversations between these individuals
since they come from different backgrounds. Each individual brings something different to the table.
1. John Locke – John Locke was an English philosopher and physician. He was known as the
"Father of Classical Liberalism. His writings influenced Voltaire and Rousseau. Locke can discuss
his writings and how they shaped society, and even influenced Thomas Jefferson while he was
writing the constitution.
2. Warren G. Harding – Warren G. Harding was the 29th President of the U.S. His administration
had many sandals under his watch such as "The Teapot Dome" Scandal. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Mother Jones– Mother Jones was an American publisher. She published articles that were
investigative and news breaking about politics, the environment, human rights and culture. It was
named after Mary Harris Jones a union activist and opponent of child labor. She can bring her
experiences and talk about them with the other individuals.
5. Samuel Gompers – Samuel Gompers was key leader in the American Labor movement. He
started the A.F.L. He promoted collective bargaining, emancipating labor and promoted the idea that
political action was important to unions. Gompers can discuss his attitude towards big businesses
and discuss how his influence impacted America.
6. Jimmy Carter – Jimmy Carter was the 39th President of the United States. He was the governor of
Georgia and also a peanut farmer. During his term in office 52 American Embassy workers in Iran
were held hostage for 444 days. After his term in office was ended they were released. Carter also
was involved with the Camp David Accords agreement with Egypt President Anwar El Sadat and
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin. His Carter Center works to make strides in human rights.
Carter can discuss important events that shaped his

History Of The Arab-Israeli Conflict In 40 Characters

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Megan Mack

More from Megan Mack (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

History Of The Arab-Israeli Conflict In 40 Characters