Race And Its Implications In The Criminal Justice System

Race and its Implications in the Criminal Justice System
Race has continually been an important issue within the United States and most predominantly the criminal justice system. Racial tension in America
is often thought of as being white versus black, even though that is not in fact the case. African–Americans view the system as favoring whites while
trying to keep them at the bottom. While whites claim that the criminal justice system is colorblind, blacks clearly do not feel this way; whites
underestimate the racial divide in the criminal justice system (Bikel, 2005). The highly publicized OJ Simpson case is well–known for being a case
more about race than murder. In the 1999 Gallup Poll, 74% of people said that OJ either "probably" or "definitely" committed murder. A black male
on trial for... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Knowing that the case of O.J Simpson was turning into one of race, father of victim Ronald Goldman, Fred Goldman, said, "He [Johnnie Cochran]
suggests that racism ought to be the most important thing that anyone ought to listen to in this court, that anyone in this nation should be listening
to. It's because of racism that we should put aside all other thoughts, all other reasons and set his murdering client free" (Bikel, 2005). Because the
case changed from one of murder to race, OJ began being viewed as a victim and it seemed that the real victims were forgotten. The defense was
responsible for, "transforming their client, an accused double murderer, into some kind of political prisoner" (Jones, 2007). It was a case of blacks
versus whites, blacks clearly siding with OJ and whites clearly with the prosecution. After four hours of deliberation, on October 3, 1995, nine
months after the trial began, OJ was found not guilty on two counts of murder involving Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. In the PBS
documentary, reactions of the verdict showed the true racial divides the case had caused. While whites were in utter dismay that this man was let
free, blacks were literally jumping for joy (Bikel, 2005). "O.J. was a term that represented every black person that got beat up by the criminal justice
system and now we have found some vindication," explains author and University of Pennsylvania professor, Michael Eric Dyson, about the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Importance Of Evidence In Criminal Justice
Evidence is very important in the criminal justice system. Evidence is relevant to many thing, such as cases. Detectives and polices uses evidence.
All evidence should be reliable to any case. Evidence is leads to the truth. the material reflection of things, the amalgam of thought, deed, action, the
recitation of how the world and its properties fit into a particular set of facts. Sometimes evidence is not a reflection of reality. The weight of
evidence are mostly one presumptions are rules and accepted conclusions and only competent of evidence is entitled to weight. In criminal cases, the
burdens of proof is the prosecutor responsibility, but in civil cases the burdens of proof is the plaintiffs responsibility. The burdens of proof is an
allocation, distribution of evidence. In the court of law, prosecution and defense counsels evaluate the quality of evidence. However, the law
enforcement collects, preserves and packages for the court room. Evidence must be in good–standing and accurate to the case. For an example, If there
was an armed robbery at a local gas station and the service clerk was shot and killed, the evidence they would use the gun, the police officers and
local detectives would find the type of gun that was used, see if blood is on the floor, fingerprints anywhere, and see if any bullets are around to
collect for evidence. All the evidence that was collected, police and dectectives would find the person you acted upon killing the clerk. If the police finds

A Summary of the O.J. Simpson Trial
O.J. Simpson stated, "I think I've been a great citizen" (Simpson). The O.J. Simpson trial was one of the most followed cases in history (Blohm
64). On the evening of June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were murdered (Piombini). The trial against O.J. began on
January 24, 1995 and ended on October 2, 1995 (Blohm 59). Going into the trial, O.J.'s fate had already been sealed due to the fact that nobody
wanted to prosecute a football legend and an actor (Piombini). In the fictional play, Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, twelve slightly frustrated
men are chosen to be on a jury for a murder trial. The men discussed the fate of a boy who murdered his father; many believed that the boy was guilty
due to racial differences.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With evidence stacked against him, the trial of O.J. Simpson began with O.J. seemly in pinch and scrambling to wiggle free of the death penalty.
Evidence started to grow and become stronger against O.J. during the night of the murders. On the night of June 12, 1994 at 875 South Bundy
Drive police found Nicole Simpson's body collapsed on the steps just inside the security gate with her current boyfriend, Ron Goldman off to the
side of the sidewalk (Turque). Both throats were slashed with signs of serious savage struggle (Turque). Blood was found on the trail outside and
in O.J.'s house, white Ford Bronco, and in a matching pair of gloves (Jones). At the scenes of both murders, police found a dark brown leather,
cashmere lined, extra large glove (Jones). On the gloves, traces of Nicole and Ron's blood were found (Jones). "If the glove doesn't fit," Johnnie
Cochran, a member of the prosecution stated, "you must acquit"(Cochran). Along with the gloves, a pair of size 12 Bruno Magli shoes made bloody
footprints that lead from the back of Nicole's condominium (Jones). Despite this, O.J. denied ever owning a pair(Jones).. O.J. had ended up with cuts
on his left hand that were most likely caused by the struggle between Ron Goldman and O.J. (Gleick, Lafferty). Regardless of the fact that the
evidence was against O.J. Simpson, he still claimed to be hitting golf balls off in his backyard during the time of the murders

Race-Based Jury Nullification
Race–based Jury Nullification
Cultural Diversity in Criminal Justice
Race–based Jury Nullification
Racial differences within the court system of the United States can create various interpretations of laws and the impartiality of such laws. Minorities
within this country may believe that the criminal justice system has prejudices and may dismiss the legality of certain laws. Jury nullification is a
process in which members of the jury exonerate a person of a guilty verdict although the evidence presented in the case overwhelmingly proves the
person's guilt. People within the jury may believe the laws are not fair, do not apply to the particular case, or they may empathize with the defendant
(McNamara & Burns, 2009).
Some ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States of America v. Marion S. Barry, Jr. After months of denying rumors and accusations of his drug use, former mayor of Washington,
DC, Marion S. Barry, Jr., was caught engaging in illegal drug activity in aFederal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) sting operation. The veteran mayor 's
crime was caught on video tape by federal agents. On the night of January 18, 1990, FBI agents arrested Barry and brought him before a federal
magistrate on misdemeanor drug charges of buying and selling crack–cocaine. Barry 's ex–girlfriend, former model Rasheeda Moore was a cooperating
government witness in the FBI undercover operation. Moore allegedly lured the mayor to a hotel rendezvous for romance and drugs. Prior to Barry
and Moore 's engagement, the FBI installed a hidden camera in the Washington, DC, hotel room. The camera provided United States attorneys and FBI
agents with a real–time video feed of the events taking place in the hotel room (CBS Interactive, 1990). United States Attorneys and FBI agents
watched as the mayor gave Moore money to purchase cocaine. Unbeknownst to Barry, Moore left the hotel room and purchased crack–cocaine from an
undercover FBI agent standing–by at the scene. Upon Moore 's return, Marion Barry inhaled the crack–cocaine using a smoking apparatus. Immediately
after this, FBI agents burst into the hotel room to make the arrest. A United States attorney holds that the set–up was

Simpson : The Raging Aggressor
O.J. Simpson: The Raging Aggressor Many Americans can still remember where they were when O.J. Simpson's murder verdict was broadcast on
national television in 1995. O.J., a former football and movie star, was on trial for the brutal murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman
on the night of June 12, 1994 in Brentwood, California. Alan Dershowitz, a member of Simpson's dream team of lawyers, published in his book
America on Trial, that during the verdict, long–distance telephone call volume declined by 58% and trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange
by 41%, and water usage decreased as people avoided using bathrooms (13). The real–life trial was like a television drama series, and people stopped
their daily activities to watch it unfold. People from all over gathered in homes and public places to witness the conclusion on live television. So
much work stopped that the verdict cost an estimated $480 million in lost productivity (Dershowitz 13). When the verdict was delivered and O.J. was
found not guilty of murder, the reaction of the American people was varied. Some people danced with joy, others cried in sorrow, and some just
watched in shock. Unfortunately, the social issues of the region and the manipulation of those issues seemed to sway the jury away from the presented
facts of the case. The evidence provided during the murder trial proved that O.J. Simpson was indeed guilty of stabbing and killing Nicole Brown
Simpson and Ronald Goldman on the night of

What Was O.j. Simpson Famous For The Murder? Essay
1. What was O.J. Simpson famous for, prior to the murder? (Additional research might be required) Prior to his infamous murder trial, O.J.
Simpson was known as a retired NFL football player, sports announcer, and actor. He had a very successful football career, having achieved
various accomplishments throughout his time in the NFL (of which include his inductions into two football Halls of Fame and breaking various
football records). 2. Who was Ron Goldman and why was he with Nicole the night of the murder? Ronald Goldman was a friend of Nicole Brown
who worked at a restaurant called the Mezzaluna Trattoria. He visited her on the night of the murder to return a pair of sunglasses that her mother
had left behind at the restaurant. 3. Where do you think OJ was heading in the white Bronco? Explain. From what the police found in the vehicle, I
assume that Simpson was on his way to the airport in an attempt to flee the country. The passport and cash is an obvious giveaway of this, as he
would need the former to make a flight and the latter for use at his destination. The fake mustache and beard could help him escape the country
unnoticed and also disguise himself once he has reached his intended hiding place. The gun would be used in case of a confrontation with the police.
4. Name two mistakes made by the prosecution. Two major mistakes made by the prosecution for the O. J. Simpson trial were filing the case in a
downtown district (diverse Los Angeles) rather than the

Essay about Life of Oj Simpson
O. J. Simpson Case One of the most famous and publicly known cases of all time is the OJ Simpson murder case. This case was publicly
announced for many years. It was very popular because not only was O.J. Simpson a famous former American football star but also an actor that had
been accused of a very serious crime that changed his life forever. Although the case was publicly announced, many people don't know many of the
specifics about his early childhood, his athletic career and most importantly about the famous murder trial. Orenthal James Simpson was born on July
9, 1947 in San Francisco, California. He lived in a very low–income neighborhood outside of San Francisco. His parents were Eunice and James Lee
Simpson. At two years old,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Of the fifty colleges that tried to recruit him after his sophomore year, Simpson chose the University of Southern California in which his career began
to unravel. (Karpinski, 2012). At the University of Southern California, He played running–back for the football team between 1967 and 1968. In 1967
he ran 1,451 yards and scored 11 touchdowns. In 1968, he led the nation, running 1,709 yards. Simpson was a key player in what is regarded as one
of the greatest American football games of the 20th century. Starring in the 1967 USC vs. UCLA football game, his 64–yard touchdown run in the 4th
quarter tied the game. Simpson enjoyed the attention of the nation playing in a national championship game and setting college football records with
his physical abilities and charming personality. Before signing his first NFL contract, Simpson had already signed a three–year, $250,000, endorsement
deal with Chevrolet. Before he played in his first NFL game, he had already made a guest appearance on the television drama, "Medical Center."
Simpson was drafted by the Buffalo Bills with the first pick of the draft. His first few years in the NFL were uneventful. He was rarely used in his
rookie season, gaining only 697 yards in 1969. The following year he suffered a knee–injury. Also known by his nickname, The Juice, Simpson topped
1,000 yards rushing five consecutive years from 1972 to 1976 and led the

A Superhero Or A Murderer?
A superhero or a murderer?
Orenthal James (O. J.) Simpson was an American football player, actor (first in commercials and later in movies), athlete and broadcaster. He was
born 9th of July 1947 in San Fransisco, California. Simpson is now 69 years old and has been in jail since 2008, charged with armed robbery and
kidnapping. But the most interesting of all is whether he did or did not kill his wife and a good friend of hers.
O. J. Simpson is a son of Eunice Simpson and Jimmy Lee Simpson. They got divorced in 1952. Eunice, his mother, was left all alone with her four
children, she worked in a hospital and had often night shifts, which led to that Simpson, his brother and two sisters had to take care of themselves
often, in the evening and throughout the night. His father was gay and was well known as the drag queen in the San Fransisco area. O. J. grew up
in the Potrero Hill district, he didn 't have a great childhood ( almost nobody in that district either). When he was 13 years old he joined a gang. O. J.
Simpson spent lots of his time on stealing and being a "gangster" in his childhood. Later when he went to City College of San Fransisco he became an
American football player. O. J. Simpson was very talented. He was soon awarded an athletic scholarship at USC (University of Southern California)
and in 1967 he ran for 1543 yards and scored 13 touchdowns. Everyone on that school was admiring him. When he won the Heisman trophy in 1968,
Simpson became a star. O. J.

Ronald Goldman Research Paper
Ronald Goldman was born on July 2, 1968 in Buffalo Grave, Illinois (Benson). He was only 25 years old when O.J. made Ronald his second victim.
Goldman was a waiter at Mezzaluna, which was restaurant Nicole Brown Simpson visited often (Birnkworth). Ronald was Nicole's presumed
boyfriend, since he was seen driving her car (Birnkworth). He died on June 12, 1994 beside Nicole Brown Simpson. Goldman did not go down without
a fight, however in the end, he was murdered (Birnkworth). His body is buried at Pierce Brothers Valley Oaks Memorial Park in Westlake Village,
Los Angeles, California (Benson). On the night of June 12, 1994 the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found just outside
Nicole's condo. Los Angeles Police Department, LAPD, rushed to the scene. There the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nicole's wounds were so severe that she bled out not long after the attack (Birnkworth). Goldman went to Nicole's house to deliver some eyeglasses
Nicole's mother had forgotten at Mezzaluna, which is where Ronald worked (Mueller). It is believed that O.J. went to Nicole's condo to kill her,
however Ronald Goldman showed up and ruined the plans of O.J. Simpson (Bensons). Therefore, Ronald Goldman is considered an accidental murder
victim (Bensons). Goldman fought for himself and Nicole, he put up a strong fight (Birnkworth). Nicole on the other hand, went down quickly
(Birnkworth). Plenty of evidence was found at the crime scene. A left bloody glove, footprints, five drops of blood that wasn't either of the victims,

Investigation Techniques In O. J. Simpson
Investigation Techniques and process of A Homicide
The O. J. Simpson double murder case, also titled "People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson was a trial in which James O.J
Simpson, a former National Football League player was convicted at the Los Angeles County Superior Court of two murder offenses on June 12,
1994. He was accused of killing his ex–wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, a restaurant waiter at Mezzaluna. The trial spans for a
period of eight months. The opening statements were read on January 23, 1995, whereas the verdict, which left Simpson a free man, was declared on
October 3, 1995. "The Trial of The Century," as it is commonly known, has been described as the most publicized trial in history. However, before
Simpson could be arrested and prosecuted, they had to go through an investigation process with the implementation of some techniques used by the Los
Angeles Police Department (LAPD) as this essay illustrates.
The O. J. Simpson double murder trial is perhaps the most publicized case this decade. However, before the police can arrest Simpson and prosecute
him, they must investigate. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They gathered enough evidence to charge him with two counts of first–degree murder. The prosecution, therefore, had to prove that O.J knowingly
caused the demise of both Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. Simpson's house guest was recorded saying that he saw O.J Simpson, shortly after the
murder, being pulled up in his white Bronco. Moreover, the limo driver stated that he waited for him for fifteen minutes before driving him to the
airport. Interestingly, the times given by the witnesses coincided with suspected murder time proving that Simpson actually had planned the crime.
His alibi was also precarious. He also had a record of spousal abuse. All evidence was against him and after the police established all crime elements,
Simpson was charged

Essay On O. J. Simpson Double Homicide
A rich famous athlete with plenty of money to hire the best lawyers and manipulate the
judicial system to be found not guilty of a double homicide. This well–known athlete is O. J.
Simpson. The victims of the double homicide were Nicole Brown Simpson, O. J.'s ex–wife, and
Ronald Goldman. Did O.J. Simpson really commit the double homicide? To this day, this is a
controversial question. Kidnapping a friend in an attempt to flee and threatening to kill himself
all before even being arrested and accused for the crime, testimonies kept from the jury, along
with other significant evidence are sure signs that O. J. Simpson should have been found guilty
of the double homicide.
Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This team of lawyers were able to pick the perfect jury needed for their not
guilty verdict. Also, the team of lawyers did a great job of manipulating the evidence into O. J.'s
favor or even having it dismissed from the trail. In fact, all points made above and the evidence
provided yet not allowed in the trial clearly prove O. J. Simpson was guilty of the double
homicide of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.

If O. J. Simpson was not so famous and didn't have the ability to pay his "dream team" of
lawyers over $20 million dollars he would have inevitably been found guilty of this double
homicide. This team of lawyers used every opportunity to manipulate and tear down the
prosecution's case that clearly proved O. J Simpson was guilty. The hair, fiber, and blood
evidence were proven to be O. J.'s but not allowed to be used against him. A confession is
normally used to prove a normal person guilty, but not if you are rich and famous with plenty of
money. O. J. Simpson was guilty of this double homicide and if he was a normal person this
verdict would have been short and

The O. J. Simpson Murder Case
In the post–modern world as well as multicultural facets of criminology and justice, various correlations are involved in the process. Through
post–Marxism, postfeminism, post–affirmative and post–structuralism dimensions, multiple variables like gender, race, class and even age are
important in understanding the handling of cases in the system (Bellis, 2007). The explanations based on crime and control of the same make sense and
differences in the correlations, despite the perspectives on the school of thoughts. The famous O. J. Simpson murder case is one of the many examples
that can be used to drive the literature sense into perspective. The case was a trial held with the suspect being responsible for his ex–wife's death, as
well as her

The Trial Of Simpson : An Agenda Setting Analysis
The Trial of O.J. Simpson: An Agenda–Setting Analysis
Mariah Short
University of Kentucky
The Trial of O.J. Simpson: An Agenda–Setting Analysis
During the infamous O.J. Simpson trial the television news media was ever present. Placing the trial as a top news story set in motion the idea that this
trial was an important issue. However, the television news media was not successful at determining whether O.J. was guilty or not. For this reason, the
O.J. Simpson trial is an excellent example of the Agenda Setting Theory. This paper will analyze the role the theory has in the murder trial. Television
news outlets support this theory by showing people the Simpson case was important through constant coverage, but was not successful at telling the
audience what to think on the issue.
Theoretical Background
Understanding the background and history of the Agenda Setting Theory is imperative to this analysis. Dr. Max McComb and Dr. Donald Shaw
developed the Agenda Setting Theory in a study conducted during the 1968 presidential election (McCombs & Shaw, 1972, p. 178). This study
describes how if an audience is exposed to the same media, they will place importance on the same issues. This theory strictly presents information and
sets the terms of public discourse. At the time, this was a trailblazing new idea.
The central claim of the Agenda Setting Theory explains why people with similar media exposure place importance on the same issues. Although
different people may feel

The Trial Of The Century
Within this writing assignment I am asked to write about a lawsuit that was taken in a civil court or criminal court. With this assignment the first
person that came to mine was O. J. Simpson because he was charge in two criminal case and one civil case. I will be discussing what was called,
"The Trial of the Century" the O. J. Simpson Murder Trial. I will give the reader a brief overview of the trial. I will explain the main laws that were
violated and the possible penalties of the crime.
In the O. J. Simpson Murder Trial, because it was the most publicized case I had never seen. People were talking about this case everywhere: on
every television channel, in the newspapers, you heard people talking about it on the streets, in supermarkets, school and even in church. Everyone was
glue to the television trying to find out what happens next. In a criminal case, the government brings charges and prosecutes an individual who has
broken the law. For a defendant to be found guilty the prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that this person committed the crime. And if
convicted the individual may be sentence to jail or prison time and/or ordered to pay a fine.
It is believed that on June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman was murdered by O. J. Simpson. Nicole was found with her throat
slashed, and head was almost severed from her body. And Ronald Goldman was found with approximately thirty stab wounds. Simpson was questioned
by Los Angeles police on June

The OJ Simpson Murder Trial and the Criminal Justice System
The OJ Simpson Murder Trial and the Criminal Justice System A crime being committed is the first event to initiate our criminal justice system. On
June 12th 1994 a double murder was reported at the residence of Nicole Brown Simpson the ex–wife of the then beloved Orenthal James (OJ)
Simpson. It was discovered that Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman had been brutally murdered and the Los Angeles Police Department
(LAPD) began their investigation, this being the second step in our criminal justice system. The murders occurred between 10:15 p.m. and 10:40 p.m.,
this is based on testimony from prosecution and defense witnesses who heard barking from the area of the crime scene. Ms. Simpson's blood–covered
pet Akita was found... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thousands of people packed the roadsides and overpasses in support of OJ as he traveled for more than fifty miles to his home, followed by
numerous police vehicles. However, eventually he was arrested and placed in detention to await indictment. The next process in the Justice
system, a Grand Jury indictment, was interrupted. OJ Simpson hired a top notch team of defense and appellate lawyers to defend him in this case
and they were able to get the Grand Jury dismissed from this case due to the massive media coverage. They claimed that the jury was prejudiced
toward the defendant because of the readily available information about the case. In lieu of the Grand Jury trial a probable cause hearing was
conducted. With that, the judge in this hearing felt that enough evidence did exist for a criminal trial and OJ Simpson was arraigned on July 29th
1994. At his arraignment OJ pleaded not guilty, specifically stating that he was "one hundred percent not guilty". Between this time and November
3rd 1994 the jury of 12 was selected out of a venire of 304 perspective jurors. All 304 perspective juror's had a seventy five page questionnaire to
complete to determine eligibility for the trial. Both the prosecuting and defending teams set out to present their case. The trial lasted 134 days in 1995
and is renowned for the media coverage from inside

Orenthal James Simpson Research Paper
Orenthal James Simpson, A Case of Evidence That Was Murdered
Branon C. Ryals
CRM 2702
Professor Jacqueline Acosta
7 December 2014 Orenthal James Simpson, A Case of Evidence That Was Murdered
In 1995, The People of the State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson, became the "most publicized murder case in history" (Price & Lovitt,
1997). From the very beginning, it seemed that the prosecution's case against O. J. Simpson for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle
Goldman was doomed to fail. There were inconsistencies in how the Los Angeles Police Department collected and preserved of evidence. They were
also called into doubt about how they controlled the evidence and who they let have access to the evidence during ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The sock was important because it appeared to have blood stains on it. For the prosecution's case against Simpson, they had the blood stains
analyzed by the Department of Justice serologist Gary Sims. He testified in the case that the blood found on the socks were what he considered to
be "spatter stains or something along those lines" (Walraven, 1995). The blood was tested and was found to be a match for one of the murder
victims, Nicole Brown Simpson. To counter this evidence, the defense for O. J. Simpson called Herbert MacDonell to testify about the blood
stains that were found on the socks in Simpson's bedroom. The defense wan't trying to deny that the blood belong to Nicole, but rather how the
blood ended up on the sock in the first place. Based on his experience in the field of bloodstain pattern analysis, he was able to present an argument
that the blood stain was a result of a "compression transfer" (Walraven, 1995), rather than blood spatter, as the prosecution suggested. The
compression transfer is said to be the result of someone placing blood onto the sock using some sort of device, and then removing it from the
surface of the sock. The amount of blood present on one particular portion of the sock was also inconsistent with what you would find if spatter had
occurred. Additionally, based on an identical spot of blood forming on the opposite side of the sock from, it was argued that the blood could have
only come in contact with the sock while it was not being worn and in a relatively flat position. The theory of the sock was that the blood was planted
on it, and that could have only have happened if it was not being worn at the time of the

Investigation Techniques Of A Homicide Essay
Investigation Techniques of A Homicide
The O. J. Simpson double murder trial is perhaps the most publicized case this decade. However, before the police can arrest Simpson and prosecute
him, they must investigate. The investigation techniques LAPD used are used all over the world.
CRIME SCENE
Patrol officers received a disturbance call at Nicole Simpson's residence. They arrived on scene and discovered two bodies. They looked around to see
if the suspect is anywhere around then they checked to determine the two subjects were dead. The officers immediately contacted the detectives on
duty and supervisors and then secured the area to ensure no contamination to the scene. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It can also break the suspect alibi.
EVIDENCES
There were numerous evidences at the residence of Nicole Simpson. There were the bodies of both Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. There was a
large amount of blood of both victims. There were also shoe prints and other evidences. These evidences could tell the investigators how the and where
the victims were killed.
The importance of crime scene security is once again emphasized here. On the bodies and the scene, there may be trace evidence from the suspect.
These trace evidences could help the investigators learn about the suspect. There might be hair and clothe fibers transferred on to the victims by the
suspect. These trace evidences can tell what sex, age, and race of the suspect. If the scene was not protected well against contamination, some of
these trace evidences could be lost. The main evidences of this case are the bodies, blood, and the questionable bloody glove. The bodies were
searched thoroughly and removed. Then the scene was searched for more obvious evidences and processed. Then trace evidences were searched for
and collected. Since most of the evidences had blood on them, the were treated with extreme caution. The evidences were also collected in a paper bag
to prevent moisture build–up, hence ruining the evidences.
DOCUMENTING THE SCENE
The first officers on the scene had taken some notes regarding the murder case. The investigators

`` The Run Of His Life : The People V. O.j. Simpson Essay
Jeffrey Toobin says in "The Run of His Life: The People V. O.J. Simpson" that, "It was the last leak in the case
–from the sheriff 's deputies guarding the
jury to their colleagues guarding Simpson: O.J. was going to walk"(429). It might have been the last leak, but it was one too many in the trial of
Orenthal James Simpson. Simpson was a famous football player which brought a lot of national attention upon him. Every major network covered
the trial. But, did the media play a bigger role than some may have anticipated? The trial of The People vs OJ Simpson was not necessary conducted
by jurors, but by the media by use of leaking news and yellow journalism.
Many authors had agreements and disagreements about the media 's role. Authors such as Mary Melton in "How High–Speed Car Chases Became a
Citywide Pastime in Los Angeles" makes an interesting case by arguing that over 5000 car chases happen in California and that the media over
reacted on this one because it was a famous athlete. Authors such as Richard L. Fox, Robert W. Van Sickel, and Thomas L. Steige in "Tabloid
Justice: Criminal Justice in an Age of Media Frenzy", argue that the trial was literally the trial of the century. Derek H. Alderman argues in "TV News
Hyper–Coverage and the Representation of Place: Observations on the O. J. Simpson Case" that the media spent a enormous amount of time covering
the trial. My argument agrees with there's and is that they spent a lot of time on the trial and use strategic

O.J. Simpson Not Guilty
To: Dr. Sirleaf
From: Vinita Dixon
Topic: Why O.J. Simpson was found not guilty
May 12, 2010
Strayer University
The double homicide trial of O.J. Simpson may be over but the speculation of how and why he was found not guilty is still running sky high. Nicole
Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman were stabbed to death outside her Brentwood townhouse on June 12 1994. Former American football
star O.J. Simpson was arrested soon after the killings but insisted from the start he was "absolutely, 100% not guilty (BBC News, 1995)."
Exactly what happened sometime after ten o 'clock on the Sunday night of June 12, 1994 is still disputed, but most likely a single male came through
the back entrance of Nicole Brown Simpson 's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Simpson left behind a letter. Addressed to "To whom it may concern," it had all the markings of a suicide letter. It ended: "Don 't feel sorry for me.
I 've had a great life, great friends. Please think of the real O. J. and not this lost person. Thanks for making my life special. I hope I helped yours.
Peace and love, O. J." Around 6:20 a motorist in Orange County saw Simpson riding in the white Bronco of his friend, A. C. Cowlings, and notified
police. Soon a dozen police cars, news helicopters, and some curious members of the public were following in pursuit of the Bronco. The slow–motion
chase would finally end with Simpson 's arrest in his own driveway. After making the arrest, police discovered $8,750 in cash, a false beard and
mustache, a loaded gun, and a passport in Cowlings ' vehicle.
Orenthal James Simpson 's fate became the essential television viewing for the American public while 95 million Americans watched police give
chase to his white Ford Bronco on the day of his arrest (BBC News, 1995). Testimony in the trial took almost nine months, encompassing about 120
witnesses, 45,000 pages of evidence and 1,100 exhibits.
The jury was made up of 10 women and two men, comprising nine blacks, two whites and one Hispanic (CNN, 1995) According to media reports,
prosecutor Marcia Clark thought that women, regardless of race, would sympathize with

The Simpson : The Murder Suspect For The Homicide Of...
The O.J. Simpson trial was one of the most distinguishable cases in American history. Many Americans tuned into the bronco chase on June 17, 1994
when Simpson was the main suspect for the murder of Nicole Brown–Simpson, O.J.'s ex–wife, and her friend Ronald Goldman, which occurred a few
days prior (Lamb, 1994). O.J. Simpson was the murder suspect for the double homicide of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. He was a retired
professional football player who resided in California. He was one of the black entertainers of the 1990's along with Oprah, Michael, Wesley, and
Spike. Through these entertainers, it was shown that there is opportunity to succeed for black men and woman in society (White, 1995). The
number one question on everyone's mind was not if O.J. was innocent or guilty, but whether he would be found guilty or just walk away. Other
questions on the mind of American's was did he actually commit the crime? Simpson had taken off from Los Angeles at 11:45 after receiving a ride
to the airport in a limousine driven by Allan Park, an employee of the Town and Country Limousine Company. The limousine had left the Simpson
estate on Rockingham Avenue about half an hour late, after Park called to report at 10:25 that no one answered his ring at the door. Park observed a
man he assumed to be Simpson enter his house at 10:56. Police called Simpson early Monday morning at the O 'Hare Plaza Hotel in Chicago, where
Simpson had planned to attend a convention of the Hertz rental car

Compare And Contrast O. J. Simpson And The Burden Of Proof
O. J. Simpson was not found guilty of murder but was found liable (the equivalent of guilty) in the wrongful death case. "The reason for that is that
the murder case was in the criminal system and the wrongful death case was a civil action" []. "For reasons such as different laws, procedures and a
different burden of proof, it was possible for one jury not to convict O. J. of the murder charges and another jury to hold him responsible for the civil
trial." []
The 2 court systems are very different. "The differences lie in different laws, the different court system and different burdens of proof." The criminal
cases that involve the murder have to be done with much precision and mistakes are not allowed. In order to convict in the criminal court, the case
against the defendant must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The burden of proof (in the civil case was a preponderance of the evidence) required is much less than it is in a criminal case.
In cases when a criminal jury may fail to find enough evidence to convict the accused and acquits the person, a civil jury could reasonably find "by a
preponderance of the evidence that a defendant's unlawful conduct results in civil liability." []
"A civil jury managed to find him guilty of the 2 murders committed, whereas a criminal jury was not able to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he
committed such vile crimes." [] "The outcomes legally don't contradict each

How The Oj Simpson Trial Changed America
Sean Dupuis Mr. Joseph Research Paper 4/1/16 How the Oj Simpson Trial Changed America In the summer of 1994, on June 17th, the entire
country sat in front of their tv's and watched as Oj Simpson fled from the police. Simpson, one of the most recognizable personalities in the
country" was a retired NFL player and appeared on television regularly on commercials and on shows. He had a very distinguished career, winning
the Heisman Trophy in college and being a dominant running back in the NFL winning the MVP and AP Male Athlete of the Year in 1973. Simpson
was now being watched by millions of people, as he was being charged for the murders on June 12th of his ex–wife Nicole Brown Simpson, and her
friend Ronald Goldman. The country would not... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was the first time people were so intrigued with a non scripted show. People liked the truth and how they were watching reality, not a scripted
show. Game shows and shows like Duck Dynasty or South Beach Tow are examples of reality tv people enjoy today. Now a days, almost half of
all shows are reality tv shows. The OJ Simpson trial can be thought of as the contribution to the growth of reality tv. It showed people real life
drama that really captivated people. The heavy media coverage of the case also brought out a new kind of evidence that would change many other
people's lives. DNA evidence was nothing new, it was just relatively not used. At the time not a lot of people understood DNA and how it could be
used in a trial. The defense team of Simpson featured two men, Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld, who had recently founded the Innocence project an
organization that was using DNA evidence to free wrongfully convicted inmates. Everyone watched the trial and DNA evidence used in the OJ case
let people know the impact it could have on a trial. The cognizance that the DNA evidence brought out to the eyes of millions of people changed the
lives of many. The Innocence Project ended up helping overturn several hundred convictions after the trial, and it still is running today. If the media
had not been so heavily involved in the case there is a great possibility that these

Case Analysis : Simpson Murder Case
he O. J. Simpson murder case (officially called the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson) was a criminal trial held in Los
Angeles County, California Superior Court from January 29 to October 3, 1995. Where the Former American football star/actor O. J. Simpson was
tried on two counts of murder following the June, 1994 deaths of his ex–wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The case was
one of the most publicized criminal trial in American history. Simpson was acquitted after a trial that lasted over nine months which was presided over
by Judge Lance Ito.
Sometime after ten o 'clock on the Sunday night of June 12, 1994, it is believed that a single male entered Nicole Brown Simpson 's condo on
through a back entrance. In a small, nearly enclosed area near the front gate, the man brutally slashed Nicole's neck, almost severing her from her
body. The man then struggled and repeatedly stabbed Ronald Goldman. Ronald Goldman an acquaintance of Nicole 's, who had come to her
condominium to return a pair of sunglasses that her mother had left earlier that evening a restaurant. Just after midnight, Nicole 's dog a howling
Akita, was spotted with blood on its belly and legs, was found by a neighbor, who went to return the dog back to the home the neighbor discovered the
two bodies. The investigation of the Brown–Simpson and Goldman murders began
Nicole Brown Simpson 's ex–husband, a former football and media personality O. J. Simpson, was on

Race Issues In The O. J. Simpson Trial
There was a time when Orenthal James Simpson was a very respected running back for the Buffalo Bills and the San Francisco 49ers, he was
nicknamed "The Juice," and was inducted into the National Football League Hall of Fame in 1985. But O.J. is most famous for the People of the State
of California v. Orenthal James Simpson, murder trial. During the case, many issues regarding race affected the people's emotions toward his verdict,
and his innocence. With the evidence there was racial controversy, activity in the courtroom, and the verdict itself.
During the trial and the prosecution of O. J. Simpson, there were many variables in this case that did not add up. Several pieces of evidence were
mismanaged during the analyzation of the crime scene ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Simpson was said to be innocent, because of the jurry's decision. But the jurry's decion was weighted to a certain side, because of the race problem
at the time. There were twelve people in the jury, and most of them were minorities. Acconding to Famous Trials, The jury constisted of nine blacks,
one hispanic, and two whites. As well as, ten of the people being women, and two being men. These different statistics had many different effects
toward the verdict that O.J. Simpson recieved.With the time period, and the race issues at the time, there were different reactions with different race
groups. In 1995, the undefeated said, "When the verdict came, the room instantly divided just like the rest of the nation, with black students cheering
and white students subdued in their disappointment. Both Loury and I had restrained "adult" reactions befitting two professional black men in a
crowd of young people." When O.J. Simpson was announced innocent, there were two basic responces from two main races in The United States.
White people were confused and upset, and black people were very happy and celebrating. By the two main reactions falling into place with the two
main races. Showing clearly, why the verdict for O.J. Simpon was

Oj Simpson Research Paper
Have you ever heard of the name O.J Simpson? If not here is some information about the case of O.J Simpson. Simpson was a NFL football player
and was accused for the murder of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman. The book "The run of his life" by Jeffrey Toobin is about his trial and how he
is innocent for the assumption of the murders of Brown and Goldman. However the book also states the evidence against him and in his favor of
not being guilty. In the 1995 controversial court case of O.J Simpson, the innocent verdict was incorrectly prosecuted. Due to a lack of evidence, the
LAPD wrongly accused Simpson of murdering Brown and Goldman. The glove that was supposedly worn by the killer did not fit Simpson. CBS
news team said, "The leather glove seemed too tight for Simpson to put on easily, especially over the latex gloves he wore underneath.". The black
leather glove had to fit Simpson for him to be guilty but it was way to tight and could not... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
O.J could of used this "Knife" to kill Brown and Goldman. Jeffrey Toobin who wrote a book about the O.J trial said, "A construction worker had
found the knife while helping to raze O. J. Simpson's former home in Brentwood" The O.J Simpson case. The construction worker could of forged
the knife and said it was found at the house when it was not, or it could be real the police have to find a reason that it is legit. In the few days
Simpson reportedly bought a knife before the murders of Brown and Goldman. Martha Ross from Mercury news said, "Murder weapon was a 15–inch
knife with a retractable blade that Simpson purchased at a downtown Los Angeles shop" Samantha Ross. He could of just bought the knife for fun or
to murder them, people really dont think so because there was no evidence of O.J having the knife. However the knife that was found by a
construction worker could be a hoax but until the police find real evidence Simpson is

Trial of O.J.Simpson
Courtroom TV Paper: OJ Simpson Trial Team C: Dwana Harris, Ian Mcguire, Ryan Raeffer, Andrew Cantrell, Renel Philippe, Aaron Pena CJA/224
October 7, 2013 Lou Wittmer Introduction The double–murder trial of O.J. Simpson is surely one that will live in infamy. From the controversial "If
the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit" phrase coined by his superstar attorney Johnnie Cochran to the jaw–dropping verdict of not guilty this case has
made its mark in history. In 1994 Nicole Brown–Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found stabbed to death. With no other obvious suspects,
Brown–Simpson's husband Orenthal James Simpson became the object of law enforcement's suspicion and was charged with the murders. The case
was brought to trial... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
O. J. was hiding in the backseat with a gun to his head waiting to take his life while his friend was driving with tons of police cars and helicopters
following close behind. This action displayed to most people that Simpson had a guilty mind after committing such a horrific crime. The
prosecutor had to prove that all three factors of the specific elements apply beyond a reasonable doubt. "In order for a person to be found guilty of
a crime they must have purposely caused the death of a human being and have done so with a stable state of mind. Some of the key elements that
were in favor of the prosecutor included DNA at the crime scene. The case also presented several key elements that favored the defense attorney
and team. These included the glove behind the guest house that was found by detectives and said to be bloody. The defense believed it was planted
by Detective Mark Fuhrman, a racist cop trying to frame Simpson and was also convinced that the blood on the glove may have been planted by
police. "The defense team gloated that the evidence gloves did not fit and that the hair analysis was not sophisticated enough to be trusted." (USA
Today, 1996). Is there sufficient evidence to believe the defendant guilty of this crime beyond a reasonable doubt? There were no eyewitnesses to the
murder and no weapon was ever found. The defense was somehow able to discredit all of the evidence

The O. J. Simpson Case
The O. J. Simpson murder case was a criminal trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court, in which the former NFL star and actor O. J.
Simpson was trial on two counts of murder for the deaths of his ex–wife Nicole Brown, and a waiter named Ronald Goldman. The O.J. trial could be
seen as a historical lens and cultural lens as well. The reason why I use those two perspectives was because; in history the black people has been
treated as non–human, criminals, and properties. And in a culture perspective, black people are racial discriminated and profiled which plays a
huge part in the OJ Simpson trial. The trial and case of O.J. Simpson has been described as one the most publicized criminal trial in all of
American history. The OJ Simpson trial could be seen as cultural perceptive because how they framed OJ based on his nationality. OJ Simpson
was a former running back in the NFL and is considered one of the greatest running back in NFL history, earning him a Hall Of Fame induction. He
was widely recognized as the "juice" because how dominant he was on the field. On the other hand his murder trial in 1995 has foreshadowed his
greatness by labeling him as a murder instead of an idol. Three years before the trial of OJ Simpson there was a huge riot in Los Angeles about four
white police officers (showing no mercy) beating an unarmed African–American male named Rodney King. The officers who assaulted Mr. King were
put on trial, however they were found innocent which

Oj Simpson Case
O.J Simpson was the number one suspect when his ex–wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found dead outside of Nicole's condo
on Bundy drive in the Brentwood area of Los Angeles. Especially because he fled with cash, his passport, a gun, and fake beard and mustache
which caused a scene in the highway and eventually pulled over in front of his house and got arrested. The death of these two people were on July
12,1994. Goldman, a waiter was over to return some sunglass Nicole and her mother had left, in the restaurant earlier that day. Most of the evidence
that was found linked back to O. J Simpson, such as the limo driver had been knocking on Simpson house no answer until the limo driver saw a
persons shadow entering the home then... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There were two black socks found in Simpson's room which matched Nicole's blood. For example, as stated in the University of Missouri Kansas
City Law school website, " Blood found on two black socks at the foot of O. J.'s bedroom. According to prosecution testimony, only 1 out of 6.8 billion
sources of blood matched the sample. Nicole Brown Simpson might well be the only person on earth whose blood matched the blood found on the
socks" (Linder). This clearly shows that Simpson was the one that murdered Nicole since the blood found in the socks matched to hers and the one
found in the Bronco he was driving the day of the murder. There was one glove found in the crime scene and the other one was found behind O.J
house. These gloves happened to be the same size and brand as well. They were both Aris Light size XL, Nicole had bought them for Simpsons in
1990 and he has worn them

Simpson Trial : The Most Famous Trial Essay
The O.J. Simpson trial is one of the most famous trials if not the most famous trial in America. The O. J. Simpson murder case (officially the People
of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson) was a trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court, in which former National Football
League star and actor O. J. Simpson was tried on two counts of murder for the June 12, 1994, deaths of his ex–wife, Nicole Brown–Simpson and a
friend of hers, a waiter."The Simpson case captured the attention of the public like no other event in media history. A reported 150 million viewers
tuned in for the criminal verdict, and hundreds of thousa–nds stayed tuned for the outcome of the civil case" (The O.J. Simpson Trials: Rhetoric,
Media, and the Law). Till this day people still talk about it as if it was still happening but in actuality it happened about 20 years ago. Yet today, there
are countless, documentaries, interviews, and even TV shows on the matter. People are still divided among the verdict and there are many questions
that have been left unanswered, the main one being did O.J. really do it? The verdict contradicted the large amount of evidence against him because he
was found not guilty. At 12:10 a.m. on June 13, 1994,Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found murdered outside of Nicole 's Bundy
Drive condominium in the Brentwood area of Los Angeles. Brown had been stabbed multiple times in the head and neck, and had defensive wounds on
her hands. Through

O.J Simpson Essay
O.J. Simpson Trial The O.J. Simpson trial was one of the most recognizable cases in American History. It went on for 9 months. At 12:10 am on June
13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman were found murdered right outside of Bundy drive condo in Brentwood. Evidence
found in the scene led the Police to suspect that O.J. Simpson was the murderer. Although the prosecution pointed to the evidence of the case Simpson
lawyers argued that the police bungle the investigation and planted evidence. An examination of the case is that one of the policemen was racist and
planted evidence in the scene to accuse O.J. Simpson of being the murderer. "Exactly what happened sometime after ten o'clock on the Sunday night of
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Soon later the police finally picked up enough evidence to get a warrant for his arrest. Simpson and his lawyer Robert Shapiro both agreed that he
will turn himself in at 10:00 am on June 17. Simpson didn't go at the time he was given so the policemen and Robert Shapiro went to Simpsons
home and discovered that he disappeared and left a letter saying "Don't feel sorry for me. I've had a great life, great friends. Please think of the real
O. J. and not this lost person. Thanks for making my life special. I hope I helped yours. Peace and love, O. J." (Linder). Policemen and his lawyer
thought it was a suicide letter. Until someone in Orange County saw Simpson riding a white bronco and immediately called the police. Only a
couple of minutes later police cars and helicopters were chasing him, they followed Simpson all the way to his front gate of his house. Policemen
saw that he was wearing a fake beard and had $8,750 in cash, loaded gun, and a passport, days later he was on his first day of the trial. On Tuesday,
Jan 24, 1995 was the first day of the trial, Judge Lance Ito open to the people in the courtroom that he will be expecting to see some good lawyering
skills for the case. Christopher Darden who open the trial said that Simpson was and abusive and a jealous husband to Nicole B. Simpson. Johnnie
Cochran who got hired by

What Happened After Ten O ' Clock On The Sunday Night
Abstract
What happened after ten o 'clock on the Sunday night of June 12, 1994 will forever be a mystery when speaking about the murder case of Nicole
Brown Simpson and her acquaintance Ronald Goldman. This paper will discuss the trial of O.J. Simpson ex football star and a famous media
personnel,. Furthermore it will go into detail about the murders, evidence gathered and the final verdict of the jury. Could Simpson have committed
the murders due to the fact that if he couldn't have Nicole, then no one could? Or was this trial all just a case that is revolved around corrupt police
trying to frame an innocent black man? Hence the defense created a new slogan for the case, "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit". What is true and
what is a lie? This paper will discuss how and why this case is one of the most popular trials in the 20th century.
The crime:
What happened after ten o 'clock on the Sunday night of June 12, 1994 will forever be a mystery when speaking about the murder case of Nicole Brown
Simpson and her acquaintance Ronald Goldman. The murder occurred in the small enclosed area near the front gate of Nicole Simpsons home,
which was located in a prestigious area of Los Angles California. Nichole was found with her neck almost completely severed. Ronald Goodman was
stabbed thirty one times. The two bodies were discovered just after midnight when Nicole Simpson's dog was found by the neighbors with blood on its
legs and belly.
The accused:
O.J. Simpson was an

On march 9th, 1997, the rapper Notorious Big was shot to...
On march 9th, 1997, the rapper Notorious Big was shot to death in LA during a drive by shooting. On the day I was born, the price per gallon in
gas was $1.46. Also during this time, the federal minimum wage was $5.05. The median family income around the time I was born was about
$30,000 to $40,000. The most popular movie during the week of my birthday was Jungle 2 Jungle, released on March 7th 1997 and generating
$59,925,026 altogether. On the day of march 9th, country wide, the temperature ranged from 99 degrees in California, and –43 degrees in Alaska. On
September Eleventh 2001, two planes were taken hostage and flown into the World Trade Center, the Twin Towers being taken down. The terrorist that
always disliked the US was called... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Intervening is what the FBI attempted with the belief of the Davidians' attempt to commit mass murder. "Branch Davidians." , Waco: Research
Resources. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. The Oklahoma City bombing happened on the morning of April 19th, 1995. Planning to commit mass murder,
ex–army soldier Timothy McVeigh parked his rented truck in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. He rented a truck to
supply it with a bomb made out of agricultural fertilizer, diesel fuel, and other deadly chemicals with the intentions of mass murder. FBI Officials
conclude that McVeigh created this bomb out of his hatred for the government, and hopes to overthrow it. McVeigh detonated the bomb at exactly
9:02am. FBI. FBI, 21 May 2010. Web. 10 May 2014. On December 19th, 1998, President Bill Clinton was impeached under the charges of perjury and
obstruction of justice. Having an affair with Monica Lewinsky, Clinton and she devised a false affidavit stating that there was no having of sexual
relations. In addition to lying in court, he had other acquaintances lie for his well being too. Clinton was mainly convicted under the law for perjury
and obstruction of justice because of the fact that he had lied about his sexual relations, not because he actually committed adultery. N.p., n.d. Web.
"What You Should Know about Obstruction of Justice." What You Should Know about Obstruction of Justice. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 May 2014. Standing
for

Problems with the OJ Simpson Trial Essay example
On June 12, 1994, the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found dead at her home in Brentwood, CA. Orenthal James
Simpson, or O.J. Simpson was notified of their deaths and immediately taken into custody for questions. Upon the collection of various pieces of
evidence from the crime scene, all avenues pointed to Simpson as the culprit for the double murder. The conclusion of Simpson criminal trial resulted
in his acquittal. There were various reasons for this acquittal. The most prominent reasons include accusations of racism, evidence contamination, and
the lack of faith in DNA profiling. This paper will discuss the issues that arose with the trial in depth and offer an explanation and solution to resolving
issues... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In an attempt to counter the racist claims of the defense, the jury was selected and was mostly African American females (Gaines 2001). The
district attorney of Los Angeles believed that an all white jury would be ineffective if Simpson were to be found guilty (Thernstrom & Fetter
1996). This outcome of the jury selection upset the Caucasian population because they felt as though the jury selection gave Simpson the upper
hand in the trial regardless of the fact that the jury was majority female. The defense counsel was able to control the jury, in a sense through
instilling in their minds that the LAPD was in fact racist. At the trial's conclusion approximately 83% of blacks believed that Simpson was guilty,
whereas only 37% of whites believed that Simpson was guilty (Thernstrom & Fetter 1996). These allegations also pushed the evidence collected
from the crime to be discredited as well. The second issue with the Simpson trial, is the collection of evidence from the crime scene. The crime scene
must be protected at all costs to ensure the integrity of the evidence that will be collected from the crime scene (Schiro, n.d.). Evidence from a crime
scene is arguably the most important aspect of solving a crime and finding an individual to be guilty of a particular crime. Evidence collection
techniques can make or break a case. Poor evidence collection techniques can discredit the prosecution and glorify the defense,

Crime Events : Simpson And Simpson
1.Crime Events On 13 June, 1994, the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were discovered in the front courtyard of Brown's
apartment. Both were stabbed to death before midnight on 12 June 1994. Brown had been stabbed multiple times in the head and neck with defence
wounds on her hands. Evidence found and collected at the scene and at Brown's ex–husband, Orenthal James (OJ) Simpson's home, led police to
suspect that Simpson was the murderer (People v. Simpson, 1995, 85; 86A; 102A; 112A). Simpson's lawyers convinced the Los Angeles Police
Department (LAPD) Simpson would turn himself in at 11am on 17 June. Simpson did not appear and the LAPD issued an all–points bulletin to arrest
him. Simpson was then broadcasted on television evading police in a car chase (Piper, 2014). At the preliminary hearing, Judge Kathleen
Kennedy–Powell ruled that there was sufficient evidence for Simpson to stand trial of two counts of first–degree murder (People v. Simpson, 1995, 12)
which later took place in the Superior Court (California) in front of Judge Lance Ito and a jury of twelve. The trial lasted nine months and Simpson
was acquitted (People v. Simpson, 1995, 234) as the prosecution failed to convince the jury that Simpson was proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
2.The Investigative Process 2.1.Forensic Evidence 2.1.1.Evidence Collected at the Crime Scene Evidence collected included blood at the scene and
hairs found on a cap at the scene and on Goldman's shirt. Both

Oj Simpson: Getting Away With Murder
Getting Away With Murder
Imagine a police chase being broadcasted on tv for millions of people to see, a man who is running now with a gun, money, and a disguise less
than twenty four hours after his ex wife and new lover were murdered. Now he is being arrested and tried with their murders and against all
evidence pointing towards the rest of his life in prison, he is released after 16 months of awaiting a verdict. Well this isn't a soap opera and that isn't
Sonny Corinthos, that is your favorite athlete, former heisman trophy winner and celebrity, Oj Simpson. On October 3rd 1995, Oj Simpson was found
innocent of killing Nicole Simpson and her believed lover Ron Goldman in one of the most controversial and corrupt court cases ever. Many people ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The jury spent only three hours deliberating the case that had produced 150 witnesses over 133 days and had cost $15 million to try. Deidre
Robertson, Judge Ito's clerk, announced the jury's verdict: "We the jury in the above entitled action find the defendant, Orenthal James Simpson, not
guilty of the crime of murder." The unanimous, meaning all jurors voted the same way, not guilty verdict was watched by over 100 million people as
it was seen live television

Essay about Criminal Evidence
Evidence is the key element in determining the guilt or innocence of those accused of crimes against society in a criminal court of law. Evidence can
come in the form of weapons, documents, pictures, tape recordings and DNA. According to the American Heritage College dictionary, evidence is the
documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as testimony in a court of law (476). It is shown in court as an item of proof, to
impeach or rehabilitate a witness, and to determine a sentence. This paper will examine two murder cases, O.J. Simpson and Daniel Taylor.
Perhaps the most famous case in the 20th century was the O. J. Simpson double murder trial. On June 12, 1994, two people were brutally killed. Those
two people ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The police investigations uncovered more evidences to link Simpson to the murders. Their testimonies showed that Simpson had actually planned the
crime. He had an alibi but it was shaky. Simpson's history of spousal abuse gave the prosecutors was a blow to his case too. All the evidences pointed
unfavorably toward O. J. Simpson
Despite all this evidence, the jury found O.J. not guilty. The LAPD made some mistakes, which allowed the defense to attack the creditability of the
police. O.J.'s defense, called "The Dream Team," took advantage of the prosecutions and the officers incompetence and created reasonable
doubt in the jurors minds (CNN). The officers' duties included making sure that no unauthorized people may enter the scene. They had allowed
unauthorized officers the go through the scene, thus causing some contamination to the crime scene. By all accounts, the prosecution did a poor job
presenting the evidence and the officers did not do a very good job at securing the scene
On the other hand, the case of Daniel Taylor, who was convicted of murdering two people also, had a solid Alibi with paperwork and witnesses to
support his alibi it seemed almost impossible for the jury to find him guilty. But on "December morning in 1992, 17 year old gang member, Daniel,
confessed to a double murder committed two weeks earlier in the Uptown neighborhood. (Chicago Tribune)". The case was built upon Taylor's
confession.
Taylor claimed that they

The Failed Prosecution Of O.j. Simpson
The Failed Prosecution of O.J. Simpson
In every case a prosecution should do what it takes to show that the defendant is guilty and bring justice to their clients. This should always ring true
but in the murders of Nicole Brown–Simpson, and Ron Goldman I continue to notice multiple flaws in the case. In the research conducted, I develop a
negative view of the individuals that put this case together. I believe there are six mistakes that occur on the part of the prosecution, that lead to a Not
Guilty verdict deciding the fate of one Orenthal James Simpson.
To understand the evidence you must first understand what occurred in these murders. The O. J. Simpson murder case (officially the People of the
State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson) was a criminal trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court in California. The trial spanned
from the jury 's swearing–in on November 2, 1994, to opening statements on January 24, 1995, to a verdict on October 3, 1995. The former
professional football star and actor O. J. Simpson was tried on two counts of murder after the deaths of his ex–wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and waiter
Ronald Lyle Goldman, in June 1994 (Simpson). The case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in American history (USA Today)
Simpson was acquitted after a trial that lasted more than eight months (Turow). The article on PBS titled "The O.J.Verdict", discusses the fact that
Simpson was found not guilty due to weak execution by the

Race And Its Implications In The Criminal Justice System

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Megan Itoh

More from Megan Itoh (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Race And Its Implications In The Criminal Justice System