Gun Control Legislation Analysis

Gun Control Legislation Analysis
. The United State has passed some laws concerning the ownership and use of gun, and more
legislation is being considered. Most of this legislation retrain, to an extent, the rights of the people
to own or use gun. Some of these constraint may be necessary, but presently some legislation is
taking it too far. The community gain from the use guns in the hands of reasonable or responsible
citizens. An attempt to stop the use or take away gun use from this community might not do well. As
individuals in such community fight for the protection of its people.
According to Jonathan stray (2013) there are two major federal laws that regulate firearm ownership
and sales civilians are restricted from using or owning grenades, machine guns or any powerful ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
. The Gun control advocates beliefs that the police is always there to protect the people, the police
cannot be there all the time to protect. When one is attack one can call the police at that time even if
you all the police it take some time for them to get to the crime scene. If asked to turn in all guns,
the only ones that will comply are the law abiding citizens, the criminals or those that feels they just
want to keep it to protect themselves won't turn it in. another reason for Gun control is that, those
that leave it carelessly in their homes endanger the lives of kids. While some that do not want this
Gun control feels there are so many incident that happens in the house that cause the death of kids
like bikes, the swimming pool and so on. They claim that the TV only says news about those gun
has killed but does not talk about those that have been saved by a gun. People tend to believe what
they hear or see. This issue about gun control is so emotional and an important one.
Acknowledgment for any mode/style of control do not rely on just mechanical dispute or
disagreement about efficiency; more or less, the point on this topic are altered seriously by values
and personal belief. We need to change our attitude and what we believe in, as this is a difficult
situation to just handle with ease. Views that are connected to worries
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

California Government Structure Essay
Structure of California's Government
Headed by the governor of the state, the state govt. of CA replicates the Federal govt. It has three
branches that perform their assigned tasks and keep within the limits set by the constitution. These
branches are:
Legislature
Executive
Judiciary
While this division has been created to give structure to the government and ensure its smooth and
effective functioning, there is, more importantly, the need to keep the power of the branches in
check and to make them accountable to each other. There is a system of 'checks and balances' that
comes into play with this segregation of duties and separation of power. This system's inception has
been attributed to Montesquieu. (Wikipedia.org)
Governor ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The governor of CA has maintained a strong position in some areas while vacillating in some, or
displaying a considerable decline in others.
Using a scale of 1–5 in which 5 is the strongest, statistics maybe examined to see changes / typical /
trends in CA – 2000 to 2007
Governor's Budget Power: 3
Governor's Veto Power: 5
Governor's Institutional Power: 3.2 (3.4 in 2000)
The Governor Rating in the year 2000 placed CA's governor at an overall rating of 3.4 and a rank of
29 among the nation.
What is interesting to note is the rating given to 'Power of the Legislature to Change Governor's
Budget' which was 1 on a 1 – 5 scale in a study conducted by Dr.Thad Beyle. This shows the CA
governor as wielding a certain amount of influence in the legislature's passing of his proposed
budget, Of course, the constitution mandates that the budget be balanced and, if not, then the
previous year's budget remain effective. This already puts limitations and expectations in the
budget's formulation.
Executive Order
Another form of legislation is an executive order. Executive orders as issued by state governors are
not laws, but do have the same binding nature.
An example of specific power that is vested in the governor and that may not be overridden unless it
is in conflict with the Article of

Sample Letter For An Application Letter
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my gratitude and deep regards to my teacher for the subject Mr. Manwendra Kumar Tiwari
for giving me such a challenging topic and also for his exemplary guidance, monitoring and
constant encouragement throughout the course of this thesis.
I also take this opportunity to express a deep sense of gratitude to my seniors in the college for their
cordial support, valuable information and guidance, which helped me in completing this task
through various stages.
I am obliged to the staff members of the Madhu Limaye Library, for the timely and valuable
information provided by them in their respective fields. I am grateful for their cooperation during
the period of my assignment.
Lastly, I thank almighty, my family and friends for their constant encouragement without which this
assignment would not have been possible.
–Abhay Singh Rajput
INTRODUCTION
A trend very much in vogue to–day in all democratic countries is that only a relatively small part of
the total legislative output emanates directly from the legislature. The bulk of the legislation is
promulgated by the executive and is known as Delegated Legislation.
So a simple definition of Delegated Legislation is that its "a type of law" which can be made quickly
and is not made by Parliament or a law made by a person or a body to whom the

Individuals In The Empire Of Oppression
1. All persons in The Empire of Oppression shall be treated equally in equal circumstances.
Discrimination on the grounds of religion, belief, political opinion, race or sex or on any other
grounds whatsoever shall not be permitted. 2. Government shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
government for a redress of grievances.
3. Everyone shall have the right to leave the region.
4. All member citizens shall be equally eligible for appointment to public service. 5. Every member
citizen shall have an equal right to elect the members of the general representative bodies and to
stand for election as a member of those bodies, subject to the limitations and exceptions prescribed
by
Executive Government.
6. Everyone shall have the right to submit petitions in writing to the competent authorities.
7. Everyone shall have the right to profess freely his/her religion or belief, either individually or in
community with others, without prejudice to his/her responsibility under the law.
8. No one shall require prior permission to publish thoughts or opinions through the press, without
prejudice to the responsibility of every person under the law.
9. No one shall be required to submit thoughts or opinions for prior approval in order to disseminate
them by means other than those mentioned in the

Parliament Vs Executive
Arguments for the successful parliament checks over the executive:
Parliament Ultimately holds a sovereign power over the Executive to create law. Any law created by
parliament reigns supreme over all– including the functions and laws presiding over the Executive.
(provided in the Constitution act 1981). Parliament makes, enforces and adjudicates on its own
grounds of procedure, not under the Parliament's rule of law applies to the Executive. The concept
of the rule of law is created by parliament and restricts the action of policy formation. One of the
key concepts that affect the Executive is that the government must exercise its power according to
the law. Broadly, the law and policy must be easily accessed and open to the public. If a member of
the Executive has breached the law or committed a crime, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Cabinet, defined as the head of the Executive is sometimes split to form Cabinet committees for
issues too broad to discuss on the weekly meeting. When deciding on the formation of cabinet and
cabinet committees, the prime minister as the head of cabinet may stack like–minded ministers to
sway the discussions. Essentially Cabinet committees become much easier to manipulate than
control over Cabinet itself, and the PM (body from Exec) is able to guide power over cabinet
without interference of parliament.
Parliament in some cases can give away the power through delegated legislation responsibilities.
Here, we can see a flaw in the separation of powers system as parliament gives away their sovereign
power to another body. (usually the Executive) . Parliament acts as an ineffective check on
Executive power as they transfer power to the already powerful Executive. This compromises the
Doctrine of the separation of powers, this gives the ability to create law to the Executive. Perhaps as
a flaw in the system, the process of handing on a delegated legislation is very

The Government Structure Of The State Of Pennsylvania
The Government of Pennsylvania is the government structure of the state of Pennsylvania as
established by the Pennsylvania Constitution. The Pennsylvania General Assembly is the state
legislature of Pennsylvania. The legislature meets in the Capitol building in Harrisburg. The General
Assembly is a bicameral legislature.
The name of the legislative branch in Pennsylvania is the PA General Assembly. Pennsylvania has
253 members in total. 50 are in the senate "the upper house" the other 200 are in the "lower house
"known as the house of representatives. Senators are elected for four year terms. There are 203
members elected to the Pennsylvania House of Representatives to a two–year term, in November of
the even numbered years. The PA ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
State agencies submit their requests to the governor in October. Public hearings are held in February
and March. The governor shows his or her proposed budget to the state legislature in February. The
legislature adopts a new budget in May. A majority vote 2/3 of the Senate is required to pass a
budget. The governor has line item veto authority. Line item veto is when an executive authority
decides to nullify specific parts of a bill, usually a budget bill. The governor is legally required to
submit a balanced budget proposal, but the legislature is not required to pass a balanced budget. The
governor ultimately controls the budget. The legislative branch can oversee the executive by
overturning votes on the budget, and also has the ability to overturn the governor's line item veto or
veto. The governor also has limited appointment power he has to have consent from the senate
before he can appoint anyone. This gives the legislative branch an advantage; many governors have
to consult with key legislators before making formal nominations. The confirmation process allows
executive branch appointments to be used by legislatures to gain influence on governors and their
policies. The governor also has to have majority vote to pass a budget nomination before the entire
Senate body.
If the nomination is made the Senate must make its decision within 25 legislative days after the
nomination is

The Emancipation of a Member of Congress
Our elected officials are sent to Washington to represent the people. In the case of the house they are
there to represent the people of a certain district. Senators are supposed to represent citizens of a
certain state. They currently have no limits on how long they can serve. There are many faces in
Congress that have been there for over 20 years. I intend to explain why having the same people
hold the same office is not healthy for the average American citizen. The original intent of the
Constitution was to limit government and the self–serving interests that become tyrannical by their
very nature. The fact that the founders did not include limiting terms for Congress appears to be a
great oversight. The reason for this is simple. When a person was chosen to serve during the time of
the founders it was considered both and honor and a burden. The founders overlooked term limits
because at the time it was not an issue as it was not lucrative to be a member of Congress. Through
devious legislation Congress has turned these offices of service into an institution that is above the
very people it was designed to serve. It has become an institution that seeks power and allows
corruption.
When one considers that the approval rate of Congress at any given time is below 30%, it would
seem apparent that citizens are not happy with how they are represented. The question then becomes
"Why are the same members of Congress elected if everyone is so unhappy with how they

Why Hong Kong Is a Consultative Government in the First...
Historian G.B. Endacott thought that the Hong Kong government was a consultative government.
The definition of a consultative government is that it consults people's opinions and listens to them.
The features of a consultative Government are that it establishes communication between local
associations, asks and listen to opinion of people, asks for opinion and support in decisions making,
sets up advisory bodies to collect opinions and set up departments to consult people's opinions. To a
large extent, I agree that the Hong Kong government was a consultative government in the first half
of the 20th century. To a small extent, I don't agree that the Hong Kong government was a
consultative government in the 20th century. In the following ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Heung Yee Kuk N.T. acted as a statutory advisory body concerning the New Territories. It
assisted the government in settling disputes and mediating between the two sides and helped
expressing the inhabitants' opinions to the government and represented them in negotiations,
fighting for their rights and interests. Fifth, the Hong Kong government set up department to consult
people's opinions. The Hong Kong government relied on the Secretariat for Chinese Affairs to
establish communication with the Chinese people. The department was established in 1913. It
carried out different functions, involving it in almost all Chinese matters, like receiving complaints
from the Chinese and mediated and settled their disputes. It helped the government in knowing the
local Chinese people well. It assisted the government in liaising with Chinese associations so that it
can understand the public opinions. The department provided the government with information of
the Chinese, for example, the Chinese custom and religious belief, and helped explaining the
policies to the public. It helped the government to gain better understanding from the Chinese,
especially before the Second World War. To a smaller extent, I don't agree that Hong Kong was a
consultative government. First, the Governor was the core of the government at that time. He owned
enormous power, including the executive power, legislative power, appointment power and some
other powers. The Governor can

Comparing the Emplementation and Scrutinizing of Proposed...
Comparing the Emplementation and Scrutinizing of Proposed Bills in the House of Commons and
Congress
This essay will examine how two institutions, namely the House of Commons and Congress, which
are supposed to serve the same process, differ widely in the way they implement and scrutinise
proposed bills. The essay will examine the relationship between the legislature and the executive;
the importance of the party; and the constitutional arrangements which give each legislature very
different characteristics.
The French philosopher Montesquieu said that there could be no democracy unless the three
branches of government, legislature, judiciary and executive, were separate bodies, which acted as
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A $1.7 trillion annual budget and congressional decentralization through the committee system
allows lawmakers to specialize and make decisions on a wide range of complex topics. This is very
different to the House of Commons (HoC), which has a much smaller budget and a less rigorous
committee system. The rigorous nature of the Congressional committee system (CCS) could be seen
as advantageous since it allows detailed legislation on potentially complex topics to be written.
However, the composition of the committee may not be unbiased, and once the legislation has been
drafted it must be ratified by the rest of Congress.
Since the CCS is so important to the USlegislative process the membership of the committees
requires careful consideration. The composition, range of interests, and the scope of their policies
are determined by the members. If a committee were full of like–minded people that were not
socially representative of the people the policies concern, then it is feasible for the democratic
process to be undermined. Furthermore, the quality of the resulting bill is highly dependent on the
ability of the committee members. To counter these potentially negative influences the bill must be
ratified by Congress once it leaves the Committee phase.
With 535 members of Congress it can be very

Milestones in Federal Gun Control Legislation
A growing number of publicized tragedies caused by gun violence have caused a great stir in the
American community. Recently, President Barack Obama has made proposals to tighten the
regulation of and the restrictions on the possession of weapons in America to lessen these tragedies.
Should the legislative branch decide in favor of his proposals, all American citizens who do or wish
to own the type of weapons in question or who use current loopholes in existing policy would be
directly affected. His proposals, which are to "require background checks for all gun sales,
strengthen the background check system for gun sales, pass a new, stronger ban on assault weapons,
limit ammunition magazines to 10 rounds, finish the job of getting ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is for this bias that they may not be seen as a reputable source of fact on the issue. "Why would
they show the horrors of gun violence when their organization revolves around guns," many liberals
ask. While organizations may be an unreliable source of reason due to the impact that resulting laws
may have on them, they still propose valid points.
Obama's proposals function on one of the oldest, fundamental goals of government: to provide order
and security to those governed. By requiring universal background checks, those deemed "unfit" to
possess a firearm would not legally have a way to buy one and therefore the severity of the
situation, should one of these individuals act on any rash thoughts, would be greatly reduced. The
same would be true if individuals who were able to possess firearms were only able to have ones of
a less ridiculous nature and with less ammunition to carry out any homicidal intentions. The right to
ban these "dangerous and unusual weapons" has already been ruled by the Supreme Court in the
case of District of Columbia v. Heller to be in accordance with the Constitution. In 1994, two laws
were passed which did these two things. However, due to loopholes, they were less effective than
intended. Even still, statistical information shows that since the year they were passed, there has
been a steady

Should Groundwater Be Regulated Essay
Groundwater: Should It Be Regulated? Imagine not having water. What's life without having water?
There's no more taking showers or washing the dishes or anything that involves water. Life would
be pretty horrendous. According to Source two, Financial Times,"... At least 1,300 people have lost
their water in and around East Porterville...". The legislature should make an act that limits the
amount of water individuals take out of the ground. "Scientist are already sounding alarm bells
about pumping too much groundwater. State water managers estimate that water tables in some
parts of the Valley have dropped 100 feet below historical lows." (Source three). California should
make a law about pumping water because in the near future there will be no more water. Another
reason is, "As water levels sink, the land can sink..." (Source three). What this means is that if
people just cluelessly poke holes into the ground to pump out water, the area that has holes will
sink. According to Source 2, "... California is the only state that doesn't really monitor or regulate
how much groundwater farmers and residents are using." This is an agonizing problem because if
the state does not watch our moves towards pumping water, people might take too much and we will
not have any ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Even though California was the only state in the West without groundwater legislation, officials
with the Kern County Farm Bureau said they're not happy with the state's bill." (Source one).
Apparently, farmers are not so happy about them making a bill. If there is a legislative law about
monitoring groundwater, then how will the farmers grow their crops? Some farmers are worried,
too, according to source three. "In Merced County, farm leaders are trying to stop two private
landowners from selling as much as 7 billion gallons of well water to farmers in another county."
(Source

Legislators Should Do Longer Hours Essay
How can the legislators do their job, if the government is giving them limitations? In article 3
section 24 of the Texas Constitution it states "members of the legislature shall receive from the
public Treasury a salary of $600 per month" (Texas Constitution, 1876). Legislators are here to
discuss and approve laws. They should have the power and abilities to request an increase in their
own salaries. There are three reasons why I believe that legislators should get an increase in salary.
First reason, demanding lawmakers to work longer hours. Second reason, spending less time at
home away from family and friends. Lastly, putting career goals on hold. Legislators are making
sacrifices every day to best serve the people and they should in return ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Many legislators have unpredictable scheduling because things are not timely based when it comes
to passing the laws. They go through these long processes just to amend things that will best serve
the needs of society in the future. Lawmakers should not work longer hours unless there is an
increase in their pay for the extra time they are serving. That is the problem with this nation, people
are selfish and will not appreciate others for the hard work and dedication they set forward to make
things happen. Most legislators are demanded to work overtime because of the obsessive
conservative people wanting things perfect before moving on to another topic. The reason being that
most legislators are accepting the overtime is because they need the extra money to send back home,
so they can still in some way provide and support their families. At the same time they are working
extra hours just to get more work done to not get paid at all. If that's the case legislators would be
better off working at a restaurant for some extra money. When legislators are not working they need
to accommodate for another job. Ross Ramsey said, "Texas legislators are paid less than the people
who sack their groceries." Apparently legislators do not get paid very well until after eight years of
serving. At that point they receive sweet benefits and is guaranteed

The Constitution Act Of 1982
The Constitution Act of 1982, or more commonly known as, "The Charter of Rights and Freedoms,"
constitutionally entrenched fundamental civil liberties, which have protected Canadians from both
federal and provincial legislative imposition. Since the Charter's inception, however, Canada's
judiciary has been placed under great criticism and scrutiny due to the fact that the courts were
believed to have been given legislative powers that rivaled both the federal and provincial
legislatures. Through Judicial Review, the Supreme Court of Canada was given the task to interpret
the charter since that wording of the legal document itself was vague enough to warrant
interpretation, and hence, gave critics a reason to believe that supreme court justices have been the
power to legislate without any political or public recourse. Unfortunately, as a result of these
criticisms, various public notions, such as appointed and not duly elected Supreme Court justices
with the ability to legislate, became the main focus in questioning whether the supreme court's
institutional functions were legitimate, and in tandem with the principles of a free and democratic
society.
Given, the misconceptions regarding the Canadian judiciary by both critics and the public alike, the
purpose of this research is to investigate the functions, and criticisms surrounding the Canadian
judiciary. The result of this investigation will provide a clear and informative argument that,
Canada's judiciary did not seize

The Issue of the Commonwealth's Spending Pattern
Intro The issue of the Commonwealths spending power?????. The recent High Court decision of
Williams's v Commonwealth [2012] , saw the introduction of significant changes to this area, and
the forthcoming Williams v Commonwealth No 2 , currently before the High Court, will likely see
issue further developed. The debate surrounding this area has to do with the fact that in addition to
the legislative heads of power in sections 51 and 52 of the constitution, there are a number of other
constitutional provisions which the federal government has attempted to use as a source of
Commonwealth spending power. The two most frequently cited examples being the section 81
Appropriations power and the section 61 Executive power. In considering both of these sections the
High Court has come to the conclusion that the scope of the spending powers should be limited.
This essay will argue the position that the High Court is justified in this approach and, with
reference to the various principles of interpretation set out by the High Court and the notions of
Federalism and Responsible Government, will show that limiting the Commonwealths spending
powers, outside of the legislative heads of power and the grants power in section 96 is both
constitutionally valid and necessary for the democratic process in Australia. The question is asked
should the commonwealth be able to spend its money on anything it feels like – including – or
should it be limited to expenditure on topics related to

The Drawbacks of Gun Control Legislation
Gun control is many issues of this nation summed up into two words. In the point of view of some
people gun control is a crime issue, while to others it is a rights issue. Gun control also is a safety
issue and believe it or not, an education issue. Within each of these problems, there are those who
want gun control legislation, and those like myself, who want less gun control legislation. The
second amendment states that we as citizens have the right to bear arms and protect ourselves. Gun
control only keeps the "good guys" from obtaining firearms. "Bad guys" will always have ways of
getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales. Another
drawback of any and all gun control legislation is that they only affect law–abiding citizens. By
clarification a criminal is someone who breaks the law. Therefore, passing gun control legislation to
control crime committed by criminals is disagreeable. According to the
(NRA) National Rifle Association, only four criminals have been taken into custody while
attempting to legally purchase a firearm. Criminals do not purchase guns legally. They have other
ways to get guns, such as the black market or theft. Many citizens are for new gun control laws, but
many are against them. Nowadays, it is almost impossible to pick up a magazine or watch the
evening news without being blasted with details of another mass shooting, or another child that

The Judiciary And The Federal Budget
Poorly crafted statues almost always require future revision, sometimes in another moment of crisis.
This type of law making tends to increase the power of executive agencies as well as the courts.
Because the judiciary is forced to clarify legislation, to rule on its details and apply legislation to
uncertain situations, vague legislation ends up allocating substantial power to the judiciary.
Imprecise and open–ended statues often increase to power of executive agencies, too. Such agencies
are given broad mandates without much guidance or oversight.
Decades ago, the US Congress would assign specific priorities and focuses to federal agencies when
approving the yearly federal budget. This guidance is especially important because the legislature
exerts little other control over independent agencies, like the Federal Trade Commission or the
Federal Communications Commission. Now, because the federal budget is so often approved during
crisis conditions (and sometimes merely extends the previous year's budget into the next), Congress
offers little guidance to independent agencies. This enhances the power of independent agencies
while leaving them without guidance. Unger's preferred mode of organizing politics would entail a
substantial increase to the last–minute compromises and revisions that cause such confusion.
The courts, too, will be called upon to specify legislative details, meaning, and reach of legislation.
Many scholars in the legal realism camp

Essay On Texas Salary
The Texas legislature is a bicameral body which is composed of a 31–member Senate and a 150 –
member House of Representative. The state legislature meets at the capital in Austin. State
legislators in Texas salaries consist of making $600 per month or $7,200 per year. Some people feel
their salary is too low, others feel as though they should raise their salaries to a sustainable career–
level wage. I believe the state legislature should not have their salaries raised and I feel they are
currently receiving the amount they deserve. When you take into consideration the amount of work
they do and politicians are not well liked by people, are reasons why their current salary pay is
justified.
The members of the Texas state legislature who consider ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In an article titled, "How Much Should State Legislators Get Paid" by Amelia Thomson–DeVeaux,
it discusses the benefits of increasing a state legislator's salary. Peverill Squire, a professor of
political science at the University of Missouri and an expert on state legislatures created a scale
which created to assess professionalism. "The question of salaries has haunted American legislatures
since the 1640s," said Squire. With the use of this scale, the question received a possible answer.
Politicians found the state legislatures who meet for longer time periods and give their legislators
more resources are capable of being more productive and doing a better job. "...more resources...are
more efficient, passing a greater percentage of bills overall and enacting more bill per legislative
day" (Thomson–DeVeaux). Amelia Thomson–DeVeaux makes reasonable points in her article on
reasons why state legislators should receive a higher salary however, she didn't take into
consideration that politicians are going to try and make a career out of being a state legislature. With
an increased salary, legislatures aren't necessarily agreeing or promising to work better or efficiently.
If they aren't agreeing to doing more or doing better, why should we increase their

Gun Control Legislation
The rule of law, gun control legislation, and public administration are intertwined on every level.
The promulgation of every constitutional right afforded by the second amendment is being dissected
following the recent tragedies in Nevada and Texas. Administrative law is the mechanism that
controls governmental power given to administrative branches and agencies. Following the passage
of the Administrative Procedure Act, the definition of "administrative law began a new journey. The
shift from "public law" to the new state administrative procedure gives legitimacy and authority to
state action (p. 90, Beckett, 2010). It is important to note that the three types of rules that govern the
behavior of administrators, substantive regulations, interpretive rules, and procedural rules are all
under current scrutiny as related to the issue of gun control legislation and public safety (p. 91,
Beckett, 2010). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It disseminates the rules by which citizens must live to maintain an orderly society. It can also be
said to be what gives rise to the "rule of law" and presents that everyone must follow the law.
Therefore, it is public policy that utilizes the three types of rules to help improve the overall
function and regulation of administrative law and public sector agencies. For example, in the
political cartoon by Foden, there has been controversy over Second Amendment Rights and New
Hampshire's support of the amendment is being seen as a political issue in the political arena for not
only media but also campaigns and scholarly study. Many people believe that prohibiting or altering
the right to carry infringes on one of their constitutional rights, which has created a public issue or
problem and creates the need and a call for public policy. In some states, such as Illinois, there have
been laws put in place to allow for stricter gun control policy's to resolve the

Gun Control Legislation
Israel has had a very complicated history filled with wars and conflict since its establishment in
1948. The constant need to safeguard the nation against potential invasions from surrounding Arab
nations means that self–defense is always high on the agenda for the state of Israel. Constant wars
throughout its 67 years in existence means that tensions are always high and this can easily be seen
in its foreign policy but what about its domestic firearms policies? Israel presents an interesting case
that shows how firearms policy, when executed well, can be a suitable example for other countries
to follow. In this paper I will analyze the effectiveness of Israeli's contemporary firearms policies
and examine how its rugged history shaped this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 2009 a sudden increase in violence created a sudden rapid increase in the number of gun
applications. According to an article by Levy, the number of firearm applications doubled after
seven murders occurred in a span of two weeks. The article states "according to the ministry's data,
some 200 to 250 appeals are now being filed every month over permit requests which were denied,
compared to about 100 in previous years." (Levy 1) The people unable to receive a firearm permit
instead opt for other means of protections. The article reports that civilians who were not qualified
to receive a firearm requested a firearms development company to instead develop a pepper spray
canister in the shape of a gun to use as a deterrent. Furthermore, the perceived threat also correlated
to an increase sale of knives, maces, and guard dogs in the face of strict gun control. This suggests
that a decrease in firearms does not mean there will be an automatic decrease in violence.
Furthermore this shows that people will take action to ensure their safety and self–defense in the
face of a perceived threat regardless of strict firearms

Gun Control Legislation In The United States
School shootings, gun disputes, many of these occurrences trending on today's news have been
related to the usage of guns or any type of violence at all. When will the American government be
ready to entitle laws to regulate these issues? When has this become a daily routine in our society,
when will we receive change? Americans have disputed about what kinds of gun legislation is
needed as well as what sorts of limitations are appropriate for decades. This issue is far more crucial
than people think, as this decision Is affecting as we speak our American society and the safety of its
citizens. The question is, whether or not to limit gun ownership. There are mixed opinions about gun
control which include the support towards controlling the

Levels of Government Essay
Independent regulatory commissions exercise all three powers of government one being the
legislative branch. The powers of the legislative branch consist of enforcing laws passed by
congress and establish policies. The legislative branch also has the power to confirm federal
appointments and to impeach federal officials. A lot of times the legislative branch raises money and
decides how that money is spent. Some monies are used to help government officials with their
campaigns. The powers of the non legislative branch consist of amending the constitution to work
with today's laws and government but some amendments did not make it to the full process like the
budget amendment and the school prayer amendment. The constitution gave the non ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, they may try to get congress members to vote against a particular bill and convince
members of the executive branch that a certain law is not that great. According to ( Volkomer; pg.
113) "the term "lobbyists" was first used several centuries ago in Great Britain when journalists
would sit in the lobbies of the House of Commons waiting to interview legislators." Most lobbyists
are known to be practicing lawyers and public relation experts that are affiliated with large firms in
Washington. Most are former members of congress and administrators who have worked in the
executive branch. With their knowledge and personal contacts they know how congress agencies
function and that's how they end up persuading congress members. I am sure there might be dangers
to lobbyists who try to influence legislators. Some dangers have been being prosecuted for bribery
and corruption. This is why they made rules so that these lobbyists could not engage in personal
relations or interactions with congressmen. They are not allowed to take them out to dinner, buy
them expensive gifts or lavish them with expensive trips. Back in 1946 this law was passed but had
many loopholes that the lobbyists still were able to get around so they continued to shower the
congressmen with these gifts in hopes of gaining more votes for the issue or causes

Analysis Of The Texas Legislature
The first Texas Legislature met in 1846 and has only had a few changes. It is a bicameral legislature
that has two chambers which include the Texas Senate, with 31 senators and the House of
Representatives, with 151 House members. The responsibility of the legislators includes promoting
their constituent's concerns and issues by addressing them during the sessions.
The Texas Legislature meets once every two years regular sessions of 140 days. However, there are
times when it is necessary for the governor to call special sessions that are limited to 30 days of
which he sets the agenda. There is not a limit to the number of special sessions that can be called.
These special sessions are exercised to complete items that were not taken care of ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Former governor Rick Perry once said "When you have a full–time legislature, they just feel pretty
inclined to be doing something. So they are going to dream up new laws, new regulations and new
statutes–and generally all of those cost money." (Champagne) Government does not need to be
involved in everything, but it is necessary to try and keep order and to protect the citizens. An
additional argument against a full–time legislation is the belief that it would increase corruption due
to the fact that the legislators would have more time together to deliberate and give in to the
temptation of unethical practices. (Champagne 217) My opinion is that a full–time legislature would
offer more time and money for the job to be completed thoroughly. Instead of scheming, they would
be able to research and discuss the bills as they are being submitted. It seems that corruption is
caused for two reasons. The first being that currently there is simply not enough time to tackle all
the issues, so when one is approached with being persuaded to support a certain bill, they act on it
when they might not have even known that it existed. Secondly, the minimal amount of pay for this
job could play a role in one being tempted to these corrupt practices for money or to enjoy things
that they would otherwise not have access to. Whether the legislature is currently corrupted or
would be so if it becomes a full–time, it is difficult to deny the fact that the legislature is not an

Reusewood Essay Questions
Q: What is ReuseWood.org?
A: ReuseWood.org is an online North American Directory outlining wood reuse and recycling
options for individuals who wish to have certain wooden products recycled.
Q: Which companies/associations are responsible for this?
A: The American Wood Council (AWC), the Canadian Wood Council (CWC), and the Building
Materials Reuse Association (BMRA) are responsible for the creation and upkeep of the
ReuseWood.org site.
Q: Who are the American Wood Council (AWC) and how are they helping?
A: The AWC are a large manufacturer of wood products in the US. They represent 75% of the
industy and they provide 400,000 medium wage jobs. The AWC, in addtion to helping reuse and
recycle wood via the website, are developing state–of–the–art technology and standard to help
assure the safe and efficient recycling of wood products. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
A: The CWC are an association representing manufacturers of Canadioan wood products and they
are strong advocates for the reuse and recycling of wood products
Q: What is the vision the CWC has for the future of wood recycling?
A: They say their vision is a culture where wood products are recognized as the sustainable building
material of choice for residential and nonresidential construction.
Q: Why is this important?
A: This is important because there have been historically a lack opportunities to recycle and reuse
wood products.
Q: How does this impact construction companies who mainly use wood as a building supply?
A: Various construction companies are being called upon to reduce enviormental impact and this
site can help to make that easier.

Q: Why is recycling wood so easy?
A: Wood is tradtionally an easy material to recycle because it is very durable and it, even in small
quantities, can be used for many other things that differ from its origional purpose.
Q: What are some features of the

Increasing Gun Control Legislation
Kasha Sullivan
1–27–16
Increasing Gun Control Legislation
A/intro? In 2000, nearly 30,000 people died due to uncontrollable gun violence, even though the US
has many gun laws. Gun control is now one of the main political issues because of all the shootings
in the past decade. There have been many studies taken on gun control, which shows more gun–
control decreases deaths with a gun involved.
B The Second Amendment in our constitution, is one that is commonly mistaken. The Second
Amendment does not state that a single citizen has the right to protect themselves with a gun. Most
people do not know the text actually says, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security
of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All that should happen is certain types of guns shouldn't be accessible to the public. For example, a
war zone gun like an M–16 should not be available to the general public because it is not used to
hunt and is not a reasonable gun to carry simply to bare arms. Gun control would also put more
restrictions on who can purchase a gun, because some people are not in the right state of mind to
own a gun. Manufacturers might also be required to make all guns child proof. It's simple, if guns
are available to everyone and anyone, gun violence will not be taken as seriously as it should be.
Also, while more gun legislation is needed, the already existing gun laws on the state and national
levels need to be strictly enforced. For example, it is a national law that in order to purchase a gun, a
background check is required, but not all states enforce this law properly.
Conclusion There are currently over 200 million guns in use, which means obtaining a gun in the
United States mustn't be that hard. If gun usage could be regulated more by banning certain
unneeded weapons to the public and requiring a more in depth background check, than miss usage
of guns, and deaths caused by them would decrease. However, already existing laws need to be
enforced and harsher penalties for those who don't follow the laws. If the country would agree on
certain legislation for gun control, than The United States could be a much safer

Spanish Firearm Control Legislation: The Spanish Gun Control
The Spanish firearm control legislation shows that Spain takes gun control very seriously. By
allowing only single fire weapons for civilians and maintaining tight control over the guns in
circulation, the Spanish greatly reduce their homicide rate. The law mandates that a prospective
buyer be licensed. To receive this license, the owner must present verifiable reason for needing a
weapon and undergo a strict vetting process. Requesting a weapon for self defense requires proof of
an immediate threat. Eighteen is the minimum age, but exceptions for hunting can be made.
What most surprises me is the unity of the Spanish people on the matter of limiting access to guns,
and the confidence they have in their government to act in that interest.

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Unicameral System
1.0. UNICAMERAL LEGISLATURES .
Unicameral legislatures or one–chamber are usually deep–rooted in countries structured on a unitary
governmental system .Unitary model is different from federal model where the latter practices
distribution of power between central government and constituent territorial units while power is
undivided on central government in unicameral legislatives system .
Merits of unicameral legislatures includes the ability to enact proposed legislation speedily because
double consideration of measures by two houses is unessential as there is only one body needed to
adopt the legislation . In other words , it is a simpler form of government . Besides , if legislation
fails to pass or if citizens interests are neglected , legislators cannot criticize the other chamber .
Hence , this proved that they have greater accountability . This model generally found in
geographically small countries with homogenous population of fewer than 10 million occupants .
Therefore, unicameral systems officials member is elected in small number for the community to
monitor . It also allowed the selection of competence individuals and the payment is higher , more
attractive salaries ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While , upper chamber prefer to be smaller of the two legislative bodies . Upper houses members
generally possess the less power than the other house but they generally serve in longer terms
.Election of the upper chamber is different in its composition and manner where they are selected
through inherintence , appointment and direct or indirect elections .Citizens often display greater
confidence in those upper chambers where they participate in the selection of the legislators through
direct or indirect elections

Statutory Construction Cases
Statutory Construction: Case Digests
Statutory Construction – it is the various methods and tests used by the courts for determining the
meaning of law.
I. General Principles in defining Statutory Construction
Whether the promotional scheme is a lottery or a gift that violates the provisions of the Postal Law
(Caltex v. Palomar)
In the case at bar, there is no requirement in the rules that any fee be paid, any merchandise be
bought, any service be rendered, or any value whatsoever be given for the privilege to participate.
The scheme is merely a gratuitous distribution of property by chance which does not violate the
provisions of the Postal Law. Construction is used where there is rendered doubtful, amongst others,
by reason of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
335 of the Civil Code.
The words used in paragraph (1) of Article 335 of the Civil Code, in enumerating the persons who
cannot adopt, are clear and unambiguous. When the New Civil Code was adopted, it changed the
word "descendant," found in the Spanish Civil Code to which the New Civil Code was patterned, to
"children." The children thus mentioned have a clearly defined meaning in law and do not include
grandchildren. In the present case, Roderick and Rommel Daoang, the grandchildren of Antero
Agonoy and Amanda Ramos–Agonoy, cannot assail the adoption of Quirino Bonilla and Wilson
Marcos by the Agonoys. Therefore, the general rule is that only statutes with an ambiguous or
doubtful meaning may be the subjects of statutory construction.
5. Paras v. Comelec
Is SK to be considered a regular local election in a recall proceeding?
The subject provision of the Local Government Code, Sec. 74 Paragraph (b) provides that "No
recall shall take place within one year from the date of the official's assumption to office or one year
immediately preceding a regular local election". Hence, It is a rule in statutory construction that
every part of the statute must be interpreted with reference to the context. In the present case, the
Sangguniang Kabataan elections cannot be considered a regular election, as this would render
inutile the recall provision of the Local Government Code. It would be more in keeping with the
intent of the

Struggling to Define Industry in the Industrial Disputes Act
INTRODUCTION
No other provision of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter ID Act) has been under as much
scrutiny as the definition of 'industry' given under section 2(j). To avail the benefit of the ID Act, it
is necessary for the worker to prove that his place of employment falls under the purview of the
definition of 'industry' in s 2(j). Over the years the judiciary has laid down certain tests and criteria
to determine and limit (or as seen later, expand) the scope of the legislation to extend the benefits to
workers in different establishments. One such issue was to examine if educational institutions
(universities, schools, etc) would fall under s. 2(j). This essay starts by tracing the judicial
developments with regard to educational institutions under s 2(j).
ARE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS 'INDUSTRY'?
The concern of education as 'industry' arose for the first time in Corporation of Nagpur v Its
Employees . It was held that the education department of the corporation was a service being
provided and would therefore fall under 'industry'. The question was again addressed in Delhi
University v Ram Nath in 1963. The argument presented was that widest meaning should be given
to s. 2(j) along the line of the decision in Hospital Mazdoor Sabha , wherein it had been stated that
'industry' expressly included 'services'. The working principle stated that the activity should involve
the co–operation of the employer and employees with the object of satisfying material

101 Chambers Review
James Taylor
10/15/12
State and Local Government
Review of 101 Chambers written by Peverill Squire and Keith E. Hamm Squire and Hamm begin
their writings with introducing the reader to the historical lineage of American legislatures and their
evolution from colonial days to the modern government. The colonial institutions "have greatly
influenced the design of the new Congress under the Constitution" (Squire and Hamm 34). The
bicameral system had its originations in colonial governments and the original colonial constitutions
had a large impact on the future constitutions. The bicameral legislation structure that is now
common in the United States began in the colonial era. The original colonies has systems that
greatly resembled ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Squire and Hamm discussed how the modern day legislatures in the United States come from
common ancestors and the evolution from the unicameral system to the bicameral. The authors also
show how the idea of institutional diffusion occurred with one state beginning to form a constitution
and structure, then others following suit soon after in most cases. Member service longevity is not a
trend that can be easily compared among states due to conflicting constitutional laws and the ability
to move into higher elective offices. When comparing state governments to Congress, the states
have a higher turnover rate because there are two sources of turnover that the Congress does not
have to deal with. One is that certain state chambers are described as springboard states, where the
representatives have a better chance of gaining a higher elected office than other states do. When the
legislator has a chance to rise in the government there tends to be a higher turnover rate. These
legislators "also tend to be more responsive to constituents on policy preferences than are legislators
in other sorts of chambers" (Maestas 2000). Term limits also play a large role in the turnover rates in
state governments compared to that of Congress' rates. States that have term limits seem to have
higher rates due to the fact that "legislators in term–limited legislatures are less obliged to focus on
their

The Issue of Gun Control Legislation Essay
The Issue of Gun Control Legislation One of the most controversial issues in our society is gun
control legislation. Violence associated with guns is increasing every year and something must be
done to stop it. Gun legislation varies in every state. In some states gun policy is stricter than in
other states. Gun legislation should be abolished in favor of federal gun legislation. To analyze the
problem with gun violence today you must understand the gun laws that are in effect. The gun
legislation in the United States are mostly based on a state level. One federal law for example,
prohibits the manufacture of all plastic guns. The federal government tightly restricts fully
automatic guns. Manufactures stamp ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The death rate with gun violence is somewhat uncertain. About one in seven gunshot wounds known
to police result in death. However, this doesn't count all of the injuries not reported to police. This
means that the actually rate is lower than the one mentioned above. Gunshot wounds are more likely
to result in death than those inflicted by a knife. The knife is the weapon considered to be the next
most lethal. One of the common question among the American public is , where do criminals obtain
guns? A recent survey asked many criminals this very question. Obtaining from friends was the
most prevalent answer. This was about 40%. Off the street was second with 14%, followed by gun
shops, which was 11%. Other sources included pawnshops 6%, fences 5%, and family members and
drug dealers 4% each (Wright,1986). It does seem very easy to get gun by this study, but it is hard to
stop them. The handgun is the favorite among criminal activity. Criminals usually prefer a handgun
with a short barrel (Shields,1981). This is because it's extremely lethal and is so easily concealed.
When it is stuck inside the belt, only the grip or

How Presidents Have Too Much Power
Most of the specifications for the executive branch in the Constitution, other than how he is to be
elected, have to deal with the interactions between Congress and the President. The president can
(fill in the blank) but only if (this part) of Congress approves. The powers of the president have been
interpreted widely so that he has more power than I believe the Framers intended. They wanted him
to be able to check Congress with veto power and be the head of the military. However, I think that
presidents nowadays have too much power. They are active in trying force their policy agenda
through Congress, manage foreign relations, and act as the administrative head of the entire nation.
The textbook lays it out well in, "The vast size of the executive branch and the number and
complexity of decisions that must be made each day pose a challenge for the White House." (316) In
order to deal with the stresses put on the executive branch, there are thousands of employees that
work to give the president the information that he needs to make decisions. He has advisors, cabinet
members, legislative liaisons; the list goes on and on, but he is the person who actually gets to make
all of the choices. The President is limited in some ways and given more power in other ways by the
structure laid out for him in the Constitution, and evolved to be what it is now. Based on the way
that the President's office was created, the makeup of the Congress can present a challenge or an

The Evolution of the Federal Budget Process
Federal spending is necessary for the economy and is essential to the accomplishment of national
goals and advancement. This is why a budget is needed, however, there is no actual process
mentioned in the Constitution that explains how Congress should do this. The Constitution states:
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;
and a regular Statement and Account of Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be
published from time to time. (U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 9).
This statement only says that the power has been designated to Congress. It does not stipulate how
to use this power nor does it give instructions for the budgeting process. Even as the role of ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Prior to this, the legislative branch had no way to determine is own spending priorities and had
nothing to compare to the President's budget. The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 also created
several other instruments for Congress to use during budgeting. First, the Congressional Budget
Office was conceived to provide financial data to Congress. This financial data includes an
economic analysis of the President's budget and its own budget proposal for comparison. Previously,
Congress had no choice but to use information from the Office of Management and Budget which
was part of the executive branch. After the CBO was created, Congress was liberated from its
reliance on the information from the executive branch. Second, it also created the House and Senate
budget committees. These committees deliberate over the President's budget using the CBO's report
as a guideline. They then draft and prepare the budget resolutions for each house. Once again,
legislature was used to further define the government budgeting process. It did not, however,
include instructions as to how to achieve actual budgeting goals such as a balanced budget or
lowered debt. It has failed to set a reform to force hard decisions.
Conclusion
The separation of power doctrine as well as the checks and balances system have created a culture
of restraint between the legislative and executive branches. Each branch's initial instinct is always to
contain the

The Importance Of The Executive Branch In The United States
The government of the United States of America has been around for over 2 centuries, in this time
the original setup has been little altered. The government is composed of three individual branches:
judicial, executive, and legislative branches. All three branches are held together using a system of
checks and balances. While each branch has some kind of trump or has control over another branch,
some branches are arguably more powerful than others. The main focus of this paper will be on
where the executive branch stands power–wise. When our founding fathers first started building our
nation from the dust, they had in mind a system of branches where no one branch was more
powerful than the others. The decision of whether or not they hit ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
That's right congress seems to have a grudge of sorts on the executive branch. This could be from a
number of things, it could be that they see the president as some annoying co–worker that just
deleted their last months project, every time the president vetos. We all know this must be
frusterating be cause im sure we have all been in their place. And if congress breathing down his
neck wasnt bad enough, one of the only checks that the executive branch has can be overridden.
That means that the thing that is supposed to stope legislation from passing can be passed. Which
isn't tha tbad of a thing because if congress passes legislation which means there is aleady a
majority. So when one man says no and then even more men say yes i think we can all see where the
real preoblem

What Affects How Efficient A Legislature
What affects how efficient a legislature is? The concept of legislative efficiency is defined as the
extent to which legislature exhibits the characteristic of organization and competency and is
measured by comparing the trustworthiness, and political efficacy of a country. Efficiency is a
fundamental element to results in life. Organizations and processes need to optimize their solutions,
in comparison to the problems they are confronted with, so that they can continue to be competitive,
and trusted in the world we observe. Legislatures are no exception to that statement, however, while
they strive to be efficient and effective, they must also look out for the values of their country or
communities, and interest of their people. In this paper I will discuss potential independent variables
associated with the efficiency of legislature, why they could be affecting the efficiency, and
examples from news stories relating to the topic
My dependent variable in this question is the efficiency. I am researching to find an independent
variable that will help me better understand how the efficiency of politics is affected in legislative
systems. The efficiency of legislature may be found on a different path than that of markets, and
companies, but in the end, they all desire an optimized system for passing legislature that citizens
believe in. In most legislature situations, this means winning a majority vote to push forward
solutions or actions to problems they are facing.

The Powers Of The U.s. Congress
Examining the Powers of the U.S. Congress Congress has constitutional rights established that
reserve a solidified position to influence the budget and its process. With most of its power being
apparent with discretionary funds in which appropriations bills occur, it also has a hand in
mandatory funding by way of legislation. A bicameral process with rules attached, takes place to
carry out the proposed budget prepared by the Executive branch. Although the President and his
administration begin the budgetary process, Congress still has a large amount of power that
sometimes isn't even used. Nevertheless, Congress is an enduring participant in the budget
appropriation process.
Power of the Purse
In the budget appropriation process, Congress is granted influential powers from the constitution. In
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, the power to control or limit federal spending is placed in the hands
of Congress. This power is known as the "Power of the Purse", which may be regarded as one of the
most effective weapons by which representatives can be armed with (Whener, 2006). Its importance
branches from the requirements Congress is granted for legislative approval of financial measures.
Among the checks and balances of the government, this ability to maneuver and influence the
budget is a democratic cornerstone. The "Power of the Purse" is Congress's main weapon against
Executive oppression by allowing congressional approval of appropriations (Whener, 2016).
However, even

Approaches to Government Control on Expenditure
1. INTRODUCTION Money is central to the functioning of a government, revenue is generated by
the imposition of taxes and the money received is then spent by the Commonwealth subject to
appropriation. The scope of the governments' capacity to spend public moneys has been a
controversial issue for many years, due to the uncertainty surrounding the scope of the spending
power. This essay will determine which approach to Government's control on expenditure is more
favourable; the narrow approach, where Commonwealth's financial expenditure should be limited to
expenses authorised by statute or the wide approach, where the Government should have unlimited
spending power. In order to determine this it is necessary to discuss the different Court's conclusions
and principles that apply in the interpretation of the relevant sections of the Constitution,
specifically the appropriation provisions ss 81 and 83, executive powers provision s 61 and s 96
relating to State grants. This essay will also evaluate other cases to discuss the effects and
developments they have had on determining the scope of Government's spending power. 2. SCOPE
OF SECTION 81 2.1 Executive Government's Appropriation Powers Commonwealth Parliament
makes money available to the Executive Government to spend on a range of matters. An
appropriation of money is needed before Parliament can lawfully spend moneys received. This is
usually done through Appropriation Acts and through annual budgets. Sections 81 and 83

Discuss the Extent to Which Different Legislatures Control...
UK Government and Politics Assessment Sheet
Title of Essay: Discuss the extent to which different legislatures control the work of the executive.
Date of Essay: 19/4
1 Independent Learning
How many articles did you read and which ones?
PR15N2 – Oversight and scrutiny
PR16N2
Did you read any books? If so, which ones?
Heywood Chapter 16 – Assemblies
Did you use any other resources, e.g. the internet? If so, which ones?
Class notes
How long did you spend PREPARING your essay? (Be honest!)
10 –15minutes
2 Completing your Essay
How much time did you spend WRITING your essay? (Again, be honest!)
Under an hour
Did you encounter any SPECIFIC problems? Give details.
3 Action Points after Feedback
4 Teacher ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, in America given the separation of powers, it is entirely possible for either or both
houses of Congress to be controlled by a different party than that of the presidents. In such a
circumstance, they may be more willing to block presidential initiatives than work with the
president. Opportunities for filibustering in the senate are also possible if the president does not
have the support of 60 senators, and this can cause delays in legislation. However, problems with
organisation in congress with a lack of leadership somewhat hinders their ability to oversee the work
of the president, as it is unclear as to whom speaks on behalf of the opposition in congress. Hence it
clear that congress is a more effective at controlling the president than parliament is at controlling

the government given the simple majorities required to pass legislation in the UK.
"Congress in committees is Congress at work". A powerful committee system in America guarantees
the organisational effectiveness of Congress. Coupled with the staffing and informational resources
than their UK counterparts, this enables them to provide greater control over the work of the
executive. They can direct these resources in fulfilling a legislative as well as scrutiny function.
However, its ability to influence the work of the executive depends on their degree of specialism for
instance senators from agribusiness would be on the Senate Committee

Essay about The NRA Killed Gun Control Legislation
The NRA Killed Gun Control Legislation
By the year 2003, it is expected that firearms will cause the most injury–related deaths in the United
States, surpassing even automobile accidents. Poll after poll have revealed that most Americans
favor stricter gun control laws. Five recent suburban school shootings have demonstrated that when
guns and kids mix, tragedy results. Yet gun control legislation remains at a standstill.
The battle for stricter gun–control laws has not been without victories. In 1968, Congress passed the
Gun Control Act in the wake of the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., President John F.
Kennedy, and Senator Robert Kennedy. The law mandated stricter licensing requirements,
prohibited the sale of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the thrill of the above victories could not prevent the agony of defeat that the country
faced between October 1997 and June 1998. There were five suburban school shootings in that time,
in Pearl Mississippi, West Paducah, Kentucky; Jonesboro, Arkansa;, Edinboro, Pennsylvania; and
Springfield, Oregon. This unspeakable violence left sixteen dead, including eleven children and
teenagers. The shooters ranged in age from 11 to 16 years old.
Although no one can explain the "why" of these tragedies, recent statistics give insight into the
"how": A 1990 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) survey found that one in twenty high school
students had carried a gun in the past month, while a 1994 Harris poll found that only one in five
students would tell a teacher if he or she knew that another student was bringing weapons to school.
Where do these kids get their guns? The Harris poll found that only 43% of parents of minors keep
their guns safely locked, which means that an estimated 1.2 million latchkey elementary school
students can access the guns kept in their houses. The consequences of the latter statistic were
brutally obvious in Jonesboro, when sixth grader Andrew Golden and eighth grader Mitchell
Johnson opened fire on a crowd of students with guns taken from a glass

Gun Control Legislation Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Lisa Stephens

More from Lisa Stephens (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Gun Control Legislation Analysis