Liberal Or Conservative Analysis

Liberal Or Conservative Analysis
Any statement that begins with "There are two types of people..." ought to be met with criticism.
People aren't that simple. But the current system of American politics undermines this, tugging at a
few major core values that tend to separate people into precisely two groups: liberals and
conservatives. Even the most historically beloved and supported president, Theodore Roosevelt, was
denied another term upon campaigning for a third ("middle") party. Political stratification always
induces disagreement, but the late trend escalades dissent to detriment. Most people would admit to
knowing at least a couple of benevolent and/or intelligent people from both ends of the political
spectrum. This begs the question of which side, liberal or conservative, is better. Is it more practical
to be a conservative–more ethical to be a liberal? Jonathan Haidt, a renown social ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
He concluded that humans are born with an innate moral system, but that social environments,
child–rearing, and life experiences rearrange the priorities of this innate system. Morality consists of
five channels: "harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, in–group/loyalty, authority/respect, and
purity/sanctity." The first two concern themselves with individual treatment, the last three concern
themselves with community and order. A survey in 2008 compared individual's prioritization of
these five channels with their position on the liberal/conservative spectrum. The survey revealed that
liberal people value care and fairness significantly higher than they value loyalty, authority, and
purity. Oddly enough, I cannot begin this sentence with "in contrast," or "conversely," because the
conservative individuals valued care and fairness relatively high as well. The difference between the
two is that conservative values are less stratified. Predictably, fairness is the lowest value for
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Conservative Viewpoints
Conservatives and liberals have completely different views of the purpose of government. Like two
ends of a stick, their views are against one another although they should be the same. However,
there is always a moderate position that can satisfy both extreme ends. As our title states, we should
be united. My personal beliefs and ideals would be assisting me when finding the moderate views,
for I'm neither a conservative nor a liberal; I believe in pleasing both ends, which, despite the
stories, can be possible.
The first portion of the preamble states that the purpose of government is to establish justice. While
conservatives believe that justice only means punishing the criminal (Hardisty), liberals believe that
justice means that society ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To conservatives, it would mean that the government would allow free use of weapons in order for
the individual to protect him/herself. To liberals, it would mean that the government is there to
protect the citizens, to provide protection for the individuals. Conservatives don't trust the police, as
the police force is a part of the government. Similar to how liberals don't trust anyone with a
weapon, seeing many homicide stories have made the headlines. As a moderate, I've done researches
on how other countries control their government and I found one weapon control from Japan to be
very suitable for our own use in the United States. The idea benefits both sides of the party; the
common individuals are allowed to have weapons for their own protection but only when they have
taken classes and pass a certain test of mental and physical health to prove their fitness. A
background check is also permitted to prevent any member of criminal or extremist groups to have
such weapons. Then a file is kept along with all gun owners in that area. Every few years, the
individual could take their weapon to the police for inspection and any broken parts. Every few
years, the individual would also retake the fitness tests to ensure they are still very able to keep the
firearm. This includes to all police members as well. That would be gun control, it's not taking away
a person's right to bear

The Election Of The Conservative Party Leadership
What, if anything, was new about Thatcherism? The ballot for the Conservative Party Leadership on
February 1975 was a turning point for the History of late 20th century politics in England. The
figure of Margaret Thatcher had emerged surprisingly as the new Party leader against the incumbent
Edward Heath. Thatcher's importance does not only lies on she being the first woman to lead the
Conservative Party, but on the ideas and statecraft that later gave life to a new concept –
Thatcherism– that marked British politics during her 11 years in command and managed to
influence the future of England's politics. However, the main point of disagreement and discussion
has been what was really Thatcherism and Margaret Thatcher's ideology ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
She also wanted to make Britain a competitive trading nation. Furthermore, she took the ideas of the
Scottish political economist Adam Smith, whom she considered the most important theorist of free
trade. The Wealth of Nations (1776) advocated for removing restrictions that were aimed to
advantage national good towards exterior goods. Thatcher wanted to embrace free trade as this
would encourage producers and traders. Finally it would stimulate competitiveness and innovation,
creating greater wealth and everyone would benefit. The result of these ideals winded up in a
revolution in economic policy and three elections won by Margaret Thatcher and the Conservative
Party. However there is a thin line between the fact that these ideals were not firstly hers – Victorian
values, free trade, monetarism, etc. – making Thatcherism seem as a mixture of well–known goods,
and the fact that Margaret Thatcher did introduced such a new statecraft that as a consequence the
new 'ism' after her name continued for years after she was no longer Prime Minister. It is argued that
Margaret Thatcher did not instigate this intellectual revolution and indeed it was the figure of Joseph
Keith during Heath's government that initiated the spread of freedom ideas and the fight against
socialism. He set up in 1974 the Centre for Policy Studies as a think–tank that

How Successful Was Edward Heath as Leader of the...
How successful was Edward Heath as leader of the Conservative Party between 1965 and 1974?
Edward Heath led the conservative party through a difficult and revolutionary period in British
politics from the years 1965 to 1974, punctuated by the joining of the ECC in 1973, prolonged
damaging strikes, high levels of inflation, and many monumental U–turns through the period of his
office. The concept of change is most notably seen right from the offset of his leadership as he was
the first conservative leader to be elected democratically, by ballot, marking a turning away from the
old boy network of Tory prime ministers preceding him. He himself went against tradition, coming
from very humble backgrounds, having been through the grammar school ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Secondly, as Wilson faced crises in the failure of Trade Union reform and a stagnant economy, the
Tories moved steadily to the right, many seeing this as a successful move by Heath. The move to the
right got a massive publicity boost in Selsdon Park Hotel at a shadow cabinet meeting (January
1970) in the run–up to the election. In the public eye, the term 'Selsdon Man' (a phrase readily
clutched by the media) meant a return to free enterprise –which directly contrasted Wilson's policies
of interventionism – the return to the values of hard work, trade union reform and a more efficient
and independent industry. These ideas, although not particularly revolutionary in terms of policy for
Tories, in election year provided a real incentive to frustrated voters, who looked at the struggling
Wilson government whose interventionist policies were having little upswing effect on the economy.
Many see the conference as an end of consensus politics, and the start of a marathon political battle
between the two leaders. The fact that the Tories gained such publicity at Selsdon, and managed to
convince the electorate that contrasting policies to the labour government such as the move to a
more free market economy was necessary, showed Heath to be a successful leader in the outset of
his campaign.
Heath can be seen to be a successful leader due to the fact he won the 1970 election, much to Harold
Wilson's surprise. However, many would place the win not down to the

Democrats Vs Conservatives
Political ideologies in the United States vary considerably, people often classify themselves as either
adhering to positions along the political spectrum as liberals, progressive, moderate or conservative.
In the world of politics we generally decide that the Democratic Party represents the liberal ideas,
while the Republican Party commonly represents the conservatives. From the understanding of this
course we define the term American conservative as a political philosophy that emphasizes
prosperity, security and tradition above other values. Whereas liberals are also a political party that
emphasizes individualism, equality and civil rights above other values. In simpler terms stress
economic rights, whereas liberals emphasizes civil rights.
There are many differences between the American conservatives and American liberals view of
human nature. Conservatives believe that the individual Americans have a right to defend
themselves and their families with guns and that the right cannot be taken away by any methods
short of a Constitutional ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The liberal views tend to favor public assistance programs, cut in military spending, a progressive
tax system and government regulation is such as areas as the food and drug industry, occupational
safety and health, housing, transportation and energy. They believed in a mixed economy, one that is
capitalist free market with limited government regulation and intervention is seen as ideal. Unlike
their counterparts, conservatives in the United States traditional favor policies that responds to
strong national defense, deregulation of business and industry and a tax cut on capital gains and
inheritances. "They often staunch oppose social spending on the grounds that give away programs
reward sloth and indolence. (Magstadt, 23)" They tend to be for policies that are pro government

Balfour's Leadership Was Responsible for the Decline in...
Balfour's leadership was responsible for the decline in the popularity of the conservative party
between the years 1902 – 1906.
Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. ( 24 marks )
Balfour's leadership along with other key factors, including chamberlain's influence, the Boer war
and the liberal party's actions, overall led to the decline in popularity for the conservative party
giving the liberals their first taste of power in the 1906 general election.
Balfour's character consisted of a very cautious, indecisive man which came across when faced with
Chamberlain and his debate on 'tariff reform', which stated that all non–British colonies should have
to pay tariffs on imports into Britain, making foreign goods more ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Other unpopular acts that Balfour passed was the 1904 Licensing Act which angered non–
conformists who felt that it was just a concession to the liquor trade, which was a prime supplier of
income for the Unionists. The 1902 Education act was also unpopular as it created local schools out
of the funding from church schools, which angered Anglicans.
However, Balfour cannot be solely to blame for the decline in popularity from the Conservative
party. A key issue in the defeat of the Conservative party was Tariff reform discussed previously,
although Balfour cannot be blamed for this issue as it was Chamberlain in favour of the reform and
was the one that put it into place, therefore it was his responsibility for the split of the Conservative
party, not Balfour's.
The Conservative government looked weak at the placement of Tariff reform, which of no fault of
Balfour or the Conservatives, reunited the Liberal party after formally being split. We could explain
the result of the 1906 general election purely as a Liberal victory rather than a Conservative defeat
which Balfour had no input in, therefore cannot be blamed for the declining popularity of the
Conservatives. After all, the

Liberal And Conservative Beliefs
After taking the self evaluation survey from StudentNewsDaily.com on liberal and conservative
beliefs, I appear to be moderate. I evaluated myself on 21 different topics under the political
spotlight and ranked myself on a scale one through ten, one being extremely liberal, and ten being
extremely conservative. My score fell in the range being neutral between both viewpoints. On some
topics I am extremely liberal, and on others I am extremely conservative.
To start are the positions I ranked myself strongly liberal on. One topic I am extremely liberal in
beliefs on is abortion. I strongly believe a women should have the right to do what they want
medically with their body. One reason I believe this is because women are often targeted for rape. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Finally, I believe that same–sex marriage is "the union of people who love each other" according to
the liberal position. The conservative position gives power to the state government to decide
whether to allow or ban same–sex marriage. I believe that if two people love each other, regardless
their race, religion, or gender, they should be able to decide for themselves if they want to get
married. The government has no right to infringe on people's rights to freedom and the pursuit of
happiness. If marriage makes a couple happy, they should have the right to get married. The
conservative position on this topic uses the argument that it goes against moral and religious beliefs.
In a society that is constantly changing its views on the ideal american family, more and more
people are becoming accepting of same–sex marriage. Although traditionally, same–sex marriage
was extremely frowned upon, we are a nation of progress, and should change our opinions and
develop into a nation of acceptance and new morals. Bringing religion into government as the chief
argument for a topic does not strengthen it because everyone has

How Successfully Did the Conservative Party Adapt to the...
When assessing the various intricate denouements of the late Victorian and Edwardian periods of the
British political history, one must stop and wonder about the performance of the Conservative party
as one of the protagonists of the parliamentary struggles and changing social and demographic
scenarios. By engaging in such exploration, it is almost impossible to avoid one of the most
formidable questions which might consequentially arise – was the Conservative party a deliberate
and conscious derivative of the changing political climate or merely a spontaneous chain reaction
driven by luck and circumstance? The answer to this question may be crucial for understanding the
nature of the party's success/failure. In order to explain why this very nature may be the crux of
articulating Conservative politics during these two historical periods, we will use the analogy of
Real vs. Nominal wages .
The simplest and most concise way of explaining the difference between real and nominal wages is
by providing an example. If one was to get a raise which amounts to extra 10% of the original value,
there is no guarantee that the raise will amount to a wider set of opportunities. The improvement of
one's overall financial well–being is grounded within the concept of real wage. The mere increase in
nominal wage has no implications if not adjusted for inflation. Moreover, if the inflation rate was to
exceed the percentage change of the salary, the worker would actually end up being worse off

Essay On Political Conservative
Political Conservative Conservative began in the French Revolution of 1789, in the 16th Century
conservative started to happen. The Definition was form through the 20–century and many
definitions were found. Many Cultural environments and political candidates began to get involved
in this issue. There are, many different types of conservative, Such as, cultural, social, religious,
physical, neo and also bio. Many of these are used for political purposes. Many People know
Different definitions for the word conservative. Sometimes as we ask our selves what is the real
definition or what does it actually define. Conservative is known as a way of looking at the world,
but it also has a second term known as conservatism. It can also be ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As we know, during the pass years there have been modifications of conservative. People that are
actually conservative will always think that what they been knowledge of will not change. Also, a
conservative will want to preserve their morals. Conservative politics sometimes mix their religion
with the politics sources. It causes for their campaign to be a part of what they believe not what they
actually want to be accepted. For example, Ted Cruz has been known for one of the most
conservatives in the elections. He always is looking out for what is good for his reputation but, of
course under conservative morals. He wants to do what he believes he should do instead of going
out the bubble. If he was not so much conservative then that would make them be a more open
person. But, like the definition of conservative does define him then it's a well example of the
definition. But was we known, during the pass few days "Ted Cruz Now Risks Destroying The
Relevancy of His Own Conservative Base" (Sundance). The question is why? He has not had to
many votes that Donald trump is winning him. This is causing lots of intense within both candidates.
"In this case manipulation might be within the convention rules, but is Ted Cruz really willing to
win by running against the will of the people just because it's

A Conservative Revolution
A Conservative Revolution Whether the American Revolution should be viewed as a conservative or
radical movement is a hotly debated topic among historians, and each side provides a convincing
case. Historians who view the movement as radical praise the colonists' effort to send the British
crown's rule and effective implementation of a democratic government to the extent the world had
never seen before. On the other hand, historians who view the American Revolution as a
conservative movement note that Americans inherited the freest democratic society in the world, and
see the movement as an inevitable breakaway from the British crown. Due to the subtlety of change
within the government structure as a result of the preexisting democratic ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He maintains a strong argument that the Revolution was a democratic movement because even
though "in terms of structure [of the government]" there is "little revolutionary to be found," the
"alteration of the balance of power within the structure"7 was a radical change. He states that
previous representatives were appointed by the British government or under strict control of
political machines. However, while Jensen supports that it was radical that people could vote
representatives into power, he seems to overlook the fact that pre–Revolutionary colonists could
vote representatives into the lower houses, thus making the post Revolution an extension of this
preexisting condition. His argument is further weakened as he gives little mention to the
disenfranchised groups of people, stating that there were "other areas where change took place,"
such as in women's right to vote, but "they were just beginnings."8 While small, isolated efforts
were made for disenfranchised groups, no group received nearly as much utility from the Revolution
as white males, and many of these groups would have to continue to fight for their rights long into
the 20th century, thus proving that the American Revolution did not provide one sharp, violent
change for the population, but rather the conservative roots for efforts that would take much longer.
Continuing to look at the groups who were

To What Extent Is the Conservative Party Still Committed...
TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY STILL COMMITTED TO ITS
TRADITIONAL PRINCIPLES?
Since 1979 the conservative party has undergone significant changes from the traditional
conservative party which focused on ideas about human nature, order and pragmatism, first with
new right conservatism under Thatcher then with the current conservative party. The current
conservative party however, can be seen to still be committed to its traditional conservative
principles such as Euro–scepticism and that they remain largely traditionalist. However there are
many ways in which the conservative party has changed such as taxation, education and the welfare
state.
One way the conservative party has changed is through taxation. Traditionally, the ... Show more
Another way the party has deviated from traditional conservative principles is through education. In
contrast with the traditional elitist view on education by the conservatives, under Cameron there has
been a strong emphasis on the idea that everybody should be able to go to university if their ability
allows them too, supporting labours policies on scholarships to students from disadvantaged
backgrounds and also attempting to establish more apprenticeship jobs and work experience jobs to
encourage young people who perhaps wouldn't go to university to learn skills that would provide a
better future for them. However, the fact remains that the vast majority of Cameron's conservatives
graduated from private schools which does make the overview of the party seem very elitist but, its
policies and support for scholarship programmes seem to challenge this idea and show that perhaps
the conservative party has changed from that traditional view.
Another thing that shows that the conservative party has stuck to its traditional principles is the fact
that the party is still very traditionalist. The conservative party has always been very traditionalist in
its views and in many ways it still is today, little or no comment is made on social issues such as gay
adoption, the party

Texas Conservative Definition
Conservative is defined in the Miriam–Webster's dictionary as believing in the value of established
and traditional practices in politics and society. With this definition in mind the Texas Legislature,
which represents Texas as a whole, is conservative.
Texas has historically been a Conservative State, from its admittance into the Union as a Slave State
until now. To analyze and support the claim that Texas is a conservative state, we can look to its
social stances on Gay Marriage and Abortion, the religious culture, the historical conservative
policies, and the Texas economic policies towards taxes.
Texas epitomizes the definition of a southern state and is placed in the Bible Belt of the United
States because of Texas' strong religious background which is the basis for many of the policies
enforced in Texas. As the Texas State Historical Association points out "The Catholic Church has
been a part of Texas history ever since Europeans first set foot on the land in 1528." Furthermore,
not only do Catholics make up a large percentage of Texas, as do Protestants. The strong adherence
to Christian morals and beliefs is a predominant factor in why Texas is conservative. ... Show more
This stems from the Christian belief that Marriage is between Man and Woman. Texas, as a
predominantly Christian state, holds on to this belief. This is also the case in regards to abortion.
Before the case Roe V. Wade (1971), the Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the woman's
life. It took a Supreme Court case to overturn this law because the lower district Texas Courts, were
conservatively minded on the topic of

Decrypting Politics
Conservatism describes the disposition of people who prefer heavy state intervention in private life
and little or no state invention in the economy. Laura Stoker, a professor at the University of
California, Berkeley, created a graph (Figure 1) that separates people's political standing based on
their views of state intervention in private life and the economy (The Charles and Louise Travers
Department of Political Science University of California, Berkeley). This description allows
individuals to compare and contrast the different political views of people. However, there is more
to the conservative label than just the group of people who prefer state intervention in the private
life but not in the economy. Conservatism is typically ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is not a specific enterprise faction within the conservative movement, but this exemplifies
how there is not perfect harmony. More accurately, Lichtman is revealing how the conservative
movement, through the joining of the knowledge, influence, and resources from the businesses that
invest themselves in the movement, works with the religious side's passion to form a workable base.
The first faction of the conservative movement we will analyze is the traditionalist faction. Dunn
views the traditionalists as the original leaders of the modern conservative movement. He states they
provided intellectual leadership spanning many years. This faction was horrified about the projects
to expand government, such as the New Deal and the Great Society. Looking to foreign affairs, they
were against the threat of communism (Dunn, vii). James Ceaser includes that presently
traditionalists have become "defenders of the culture" (Dunn, 23). Ceaser believes they prefer
change that comes naturally rather than change that is created and forced. In this way they aim to
"conserve" by keeping more of a status quo or what gradually evolves in politics from situations.
This seems to reveal the current situation in which a dramatic change in health care was forced upon
the American people, for disapproval continues to be greater than approval (Rasmussen Reports,
LLC). This is an example of an unnatural event that

Do You Agree with the View That the Conservative Party’s...
The Conservative Party which was leaded by Winston Churchill (1951–55) and Anthony Eden
(1955–57) and Harold Macmillan (1957–63) between the years 1951–59 wanted, according to their
manifesto in 1951, to stop all further nationalisation. The Iron and Steel Act will be repealed and the
Steel industry allowed resuming its achievements of the war and post–war years. To supervise prices
and development we shall revive, if necessary with added powers, the former Iron and Steel Board
representing the State, the management, labour, and consumers. They also wanted to free the people
from austerity and housing shortages. Macmillan introduced the stop and go economy. If the
domestic consumption and the prices rose too quickly (and the economy ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The first motorways were built and the Clean Air Act (1956) was passed. The home ownership
increased from 30 per cent to 50 per cent and also the personal savings increased from 200£ to
2000£. The Conservative Party hindered the country's economic development but just limited. On
one side it hindered the economic development (stop and go), on the other side it enabled the
economic growth.
Source 4 is a book called Mastering Modern British History from Norman Lowe which is published
in 1984. This source is a secondary source. The Source sets up the thesis "Conservative Party
hindered the country's economic development. It criticises that the Conservative Party emphasised
the improvement in world trade rather than improving the economic policies. This caused an
economic failure. It accuses the Conservative Party for hindering the country's economic
development. The introduction of the stop and go approach caused this as well. The stop and go
approach caused Stagflation. This is a situation where an inflation rate is high, the economic growth
rate slows down, and unemployment remains steadily high. Considering the faults under the
Conservative Party the government did not perceive their opportunities to improve the economic
failures. The government had no coherent economic policy (they used stop and go). There was no
structured financial strategy (the budget was used to buy votes). The investment in the Research and
Development was

Compare And Contrast Conservatives And Liberals
In the world of politics, there are two main political parties in the U.S. These two parties are
conservatives and liberals. Conservatives are traditionally the Republican Party while liberals are
the Democratic Party. Conservatives want to maintain the traditional values and want to conserve
existing structure. Conservatives support limited government involvement in the private sphere,
lower taxes, and free market (a disadvantage for minorities). Liberals are more "open to progress
and highly reliant in the government to solve problems" (Squadrin 4). Liberals support more active
role of government, policies to aid minorities and equal opportunity for all human beings. Both
parties have opposing views when it comes to economic, political and social issues. Conservatives
and liberals have different views when it comes to economic policies. According to Squadrin, author
of "Conservatives vs. Liberals, Liberals believe that the "government should interfere and regulate
the economy of the nation in order to protect citizens from corporate power" while conservatives
encourage a free market where "the government should not regulate the economic system of the
nation" (Squadrin 6). Free market is a system where the prices of goods are determined by the
buyers and government imposes few or no restrictions. Another example of their economic
difference is when it comes to Taxes. Even though they both support low taxes, liberals "believe that
wealthy people should pay higher

A Study on Conservative Resurgence
Conservative Resurgence (Order #A2065848) For many years the Republican party and its
conservative base was the central point of blame for the economic woes that had occurred in
America during the Great Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and his liberal Democratic party
were portrayed as the saviors of the United States' economy and the only intellectual and political
tradition that remained for America. However, the social excesses, political instability and economic
turmoil that the liberals of the late 1960's and early 1970's created, led to a resurgence in
conservative thinking. Americans began to reject the complete dependence on the government, and
the inefficiency and corruption associated with it, in favor of a more independent and politically
conservative way of thinking. As a result, 1980 saw the election of Ronald Reagan, a hard–core
conservative Republican as President of the United States. Reagan's victory over then President
Jimmy Carter signaled a distinct resurgence in conservative values and political activity. In the
1950's, Lionel Trilling, famous literary critic and writer, stated that "in the United States at this time
liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition." (McPherson, 2008, p.30)
This belief was maintained throughout the 1960's and 1970's within the American intellectual and
political community. In addition, the conservative opposition to the civil rights movement, although
for constitutional reasons, had

How Is The Defeat Of The Conservative Party In 1945 Best...
How is the defeat of the conservative party in 1945 best explained ?
On the 26th July 1945, Clement Attlee lead the labour party to a landslide victory against the
conservative party, represented by wartime hero Winston Churchill. This came as a shock to the
British population, who had not anticipated this outcome. The defeat of the conservative party in
1945 can be best explained by highlighting the contrast between the people and the conservative
party, the conservatives' inability to carry out successful policies, and the strength of the labour
party.
The conservative party had been intent on encouraging the preservation of traditional cultural
values, and relied on putting the power in the hands of elected representatives rather than in the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Indeed the labour party had grown stronger during the coalition by promising the people reforms
once the war would be over. These ideas were promoted through effective propaganda, particularly
on the home front, which promised the nationalisation of industry, better housing, free medical
services and employment for all. On the other hand, the conservative party was not in favour of
these reforms: for instance Churchill completely ignored the Beveridge Report, a manifesto of social
reforms, and focused on conducting the war instead. These promised reforms caused the labour
party's popularity to increase as citizens hoped for a better future which in turn weakened the
conservative party. Furthermore, Churchill's confidence and unawareness of this powerful
opposition allowed the labour party to further develop. Churchill had never fallen below 78 per cent
in the approval rating in the opinion polls: consequently the prime minister did not organise his
election campaign strategy appropriately which once again allowed the opposing party to
strengthen. Thus the forceful labour party was able to win a landslide victory against the unprepared

Conservative Judaism
"When people around the world were worshiping thunder and wind, the Jews had but one word to
say – God." Judaism is one of the three major religions in our society today along with Islam and
Christianity. Judaism believes there is only one God who created and presides over the world. Their
God is all powerful, all knowing and is in all places at all times. He is also compassionate and just.
The Jewish religion is passed on via the mother of a child. If the mother is Jewish, the child is 100%
Jewish. According to Jewish law, one will remain a Jew even if they don't practice Judaism or they
do not believe in God. The Israelites accepted the Ten Commandments from God at Mount Sinai
therefore they devoted themselves to following a code of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Conservative Judaism sustains the idea in the Torah came from God, but was interpreted by humans
and contains a human element in it. Conservative Judaism generally accepts the required nature of
halakhah, but like Reconstructionist Judaism believes that the Law should adapt, taking into account
the changes in society while also remaining true to Judaism's values. Orthodox Jews believe that
God gave Moses the whole Torah, the written and oral at Mount Sinai. Modern Orthodox Jews
follow halakhah very precisely, but still attempt to integrate into modern society. Ultra–Orthodox
Jews, like Chasidic Jews, strictly observe Jewish laws and don't attempt to integrate into modern
society by dressing traditionally and living separately. Judaism consists of many holidays where
Jews celebrate their religious devotion. For example, Hanukkah the festival of lights. Jews light
Hanukkah candles to remember the miracle of the oil that burnt for eight days and the miracle of the
Maccabees victory. Its said that after three years of fighting, the Maccabees succeeded to drive the
Greco–Syrians out of Judea. The lights remind the Jews of the miracles and of the struggle for
religious freedom. Also, Yom Kippur (The Day of Atonement) which is the holiest day of the Jewish
year. Yom Kippur is the only fast day decreed in the Bible. The fast last for 25–hours starting before

Conservatives In The Handmaid's Tale
In the novel The Handmaid's Tale, Margaret Atwood depicts a near–future world in which Christian
theonomy has overthrown the United States Government, and all of the women's rights are taken
from them. The novel is told from the perspective of a woman who is living in the new world and
how she survives it, as well as how she ended up in this horrendous position. Atwood's novel has
been read by millions of individuals throughout the years, leaving many with different perspectives
on it. This critical response will examine how liberals and conservatives have interpreted the novel
in different manners. Every person has their own interpretation of things, for example, liberals
versus conservatives while reading this novel. Liberals could read this ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is one of the few parts in the novel were conservatives and liberals would have the same
perspective on, but for different reasons. Both conservatives and liberals would find this completely
unacceptable and altogether distasteful. Conservatives would interpret this as something utterly
horrible because the men are going out and being unfaithful to their wives and being a disgrace to
the community. They would find it shameful that the eyes, spies around Gilead making sure
everyone is following the rules, are not doing anything about this and are just letting the men get
away with this distasteful act. Conservatives would point out the fact that Jezebels should not have
been allowed in the first place. Anyone who rebels should either be executed or exiled. Liberals
would also find this distasteful, mostly for the fact that men are being allowed to act out but women
are not. Not to forget the fact that the Jezebels are looked down on by everyone who knows about
them, but the highest ranking men going to visit them are not. The men are on the same level if not
worse than the Jezebels, but everyone turns his or her heads at them and pretends nothing is
happening. As always men are not held to the same standard as women are, causing the women to
always be the ones getting

Conservative Viewpoints Analysis
Libbrook is a small town in Kansas. Everyone in the town is depressed because Kansas is so boring,
and it is so flat that you can see the whole state no matter where you stand. The entire town is made
up of mostly older retired farmers and their wives, as well as some younger people simply living in
town out of preference. There was a small grocery store owned by a man named Jim Smith, who
proudly owned and worked at his store ever since 1982. He had a son who helped him out in the
store, his son's name was Jeremy. Jeremy was that one person in every town who left the small town
in search of a better life. He sought after this better life by pursuing a degree from the California
Institute of the Arts. Unfortunately, Jeremy was one of those idiots who pursued an obscure ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"You think you're right in your views, and they're wrong, but that's not the case. Nobody is right,
some views conservative views may be correct, and some liberal views may be correct, but in the
end it's all our opinions. We all think we are right, but in reality nobody is right. Opinions on politics
and religion are things that people let get in the way of friendships and relationships with other
people too often. You're one of those people, you just need to understand that these people really
aren't all that bad, and you can have friends here and enjoy their company. You just need to accept
the fact that they are religious and have different views than you, but that's okay." Jeremy thought
for a long time on this. "I guess you're right," he said suddenly. "I've been too stubborn about their
religion and political views to actually see if they were nice people. Maybe we are all just a little to
hostile towards each other about that stuff. I guess I really shouldn't care if they are religious, or if
they are conservative, just their character and personalities. After all, everyone can have any opinion
they want, this is a free country after

‘The main reason for conservative dominance in the years...
'The main reason for conservative dominance in the years 1951 to 1964 was labour disunity' Assess
the validity of this view. (June 2011)
Labour disunity was a huge contributing factor as to why the conservatives were able to dominate
from 1951 to 1964. However, there are also other factors that assisted conservative dominance.
Whether that be conservative strengths, good timing, the end of austerity or their handle on public
opinion, all factors contributed to the dominant years. However, how long the conservatives actually
dominated is also a question. Did they dominate for the whole period, or just part of it? The years
1962–1964 question conservative dominance and how labour reunited.
One of the major reasons why Conservatives were ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Failure to exploit opportunities was also another labour problem. The 1956 sued crisis provided
labour with a great opportunity to get back on the attack. If there had been a general election in 1957
then things may have favoured labour. However, Suez did not split the conservatives and labour
were left with few targets to aim at in hoping to gain more supporters. The Labour party's inability
to counter conservative mistakes was a direct result of their disunity.
As well as labour disunity there are other factors to consider as to why conservatives dominated.
Firstly, the reorganisation of the party machine led by Lord Woolton after the dislocation caused by
the war and the shock defeat for the conservatives in 1946 proved pivotal for the conservatives in
improving their ideas (new conservatives with new ideas) and general organisation.
The conservatives recognised the extent of public approval for the legacy of the Attlee government.
Most Conservatives grasped the political realities of the time. There can be no outright rejection of
the welfare state, nor a total reversal of nationalisation. Attitudes towards industry, the trade unions
and social policy were going to have to be very different from the 1930s because the experiences of
the war years had made people far more ready to accept the need for state intervention and planning.
The post–war years had seen living standards rise, proving to be very popular

To What Extent Can the Modern Conservative Party Be...
.'To what extent can the modern conservative party be considered 'One nation'? (25 marks)
'One nation' is an idea that is based upon principles such as paternalism, and it is the name given to
describe this particular faction of the conservative party. 'One nation conservatives' is the name
given to the followers of the ideas presented by Benjamin Disrael, and the belief in changing Britain
from 'two nations' i.e the rich and the poor, and instead creating one. Benjamin Disraeli adopted one
nation conservatism for both ethical and electoral reasons. Before he became leader of the
Conservative Party, Disraeli had announced that, as a result of the Reform Act of 1867 the party
needed to pursue social reforms if it was to have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example David Cameron (DC) controversially changed the outlook of the conservative party
and claimed it to be 'The party of the NHS'. He also believes that state intervention within healthcare
s needed and vital, as well as being against any privatisation of the NHS. Although the contrasting
Right wing faction of the conservative party 'Thatcherities' oppose this, as Margret Thatcher reduced
the size of the state, and they believe State intervention to be negative as it took a lot of industries
out of public control and into the state. However; overall even though DC claims he is against any
privatisation of the NHS, there is a continuing growth in services being provided by private health
care companies, although I do believe that on the matter of the NHS DC has moved the conservative
party towards the centre as DC and the modern conservative party have outspent Labour on the
NHS, which is what he promised to do. Therefore to some degree the modern conservative party can
be considered more 'One nation'. Thirdly, a one nation principle is Social Duty, and an example of
DC supporting social duty is that during the 2010 election, he launched his main 'one nation' idea,
this being 'The Big Society'. This envisaged volunteers and charities taking the place of government
to carry out their social duties and responsibilities in order to improve their communities. Dc's key
argument was that the public should solve society's problems rather than the government, and

The Conservative Movement Analysis
In the immediate aftermath of the election, conservative opinions on the Goldwater campaign
varied. While some praised Goldwater's efforts and held out hope for continuing conservative
momentum, others saw his defeat not only as an individual defeat, but also as the derailing of the
entire conservative movement. On the day after the election, the New York Times argued that "Barry
Goldwater not only lost the presidential election... but the conservative cause as well." This
conclusion would be later discredited by continued conservative success in the mid–term elections
of 1966 and the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. "Paradoxically, Goldwater's monumental loss
marked the beginning of a shift to the Right that would eventually end 50 years ... Show more
The history of American conservatism reveals the diversity of the ideologies and values that
comprise the modern public philosophy. This history also reveals the fragility of the conservative
coalition. Conservatives agree primarily on the concepts that they oppose, rather than on principles
that they share. Professor James Ceaser argues that "much of the unity that exists among
conservatives stems from their shared antipathy to liberalism. It serves as the common heart that
beats in the breast of the conservative movement's diverse and often fractious components." Ceaser
provides a useful analogy for the conservative movement. The "common heart" of conservatism is
an antagonism towards liberalism that supplies the blood to the movement's four heads:
Traditionalism, Classical Libertarianism, Neoconservatism, and the Religious Right. Caesar asserts
that, in politics, there is no shame "to relying in the adhesive nature supplied by a common

Conservative Movement Thesis
Carter's thesis is: Although the Conservative Movement gained followers through careful
advertisement and presentation of candidates in the 20th century, their agenda was mainly aided by
racist social opinions, anti–welfare economic movements, and commercial displaying of candidates.
George Wallace (Democrat) led a social movement so angry and powerful that he forced Richard
Nixon (Republican) to learn the art of fully exploiting white voter's racial fears without running
openly racist campaigns or governing in a racist way. Since then, people with presidential
aspirations and the presidents themselves have evolved and refined these tricks into racially coded
political advertisements, slogans, and symbolically charged events. George Wallace came into
power by leading a social movement that was based on exploiting white voter's racial fears. At the
beginning, the Democrat's positions were openly racist. Wallace started exploiting white voter's
racial fears when he stated "Segregation now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!"
Eventually, talk of race came to be "coded" into politics, like issues of "welfare reform." Most
candidates in today's world would not openly incite racism.
According to the author, Nixon's plan was to capitalize on what Wallace (Democrat) had started and
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In fact, I had to add 'ableist' to my computer's dictionary, because apparently no one wants to
acknowledge that there is an actual word for someone who discriminates against the mentally ill!
Surely, this book focusing on the plight of the "others," would mention some support for the
mentally disabled or sentiments against ableism. Carter comments on the atrocities of racist issues,
but merely mentions Reagan's comment, not defending it, rebutting it, or even mentioning the world
'ableism.' While this is not the focus of Carter's book, it should be present in any book about

The Conservative Heart Analysis
Arthur Brooks' book "The Conservative Heart – How to Build a Fairer, Happier and More
Prosperous America" represents a challenge to the established view of Conservatives and
Republicans regarding America's social issues. Many Americans feel caught between two dispiriting
political choices: ineffective compassion on one hand and heartless pragmatism on the other. While
Democrats/Progressives have always provided this ongoing narrative of party who were once the
champions of the underprivileged; collapsed in the 2016 elections. The Progressive message was
clearly understood as "identity politics" not the champions of the underdog as promised. However,
Conservatives who can provide the better solutions to poverty were tagged with a variety of labels,
such as non–compassionate or out of touch. Conservatives have been notoriously marked as the
"country club" concerned about their own wealth preservation. Unfortunately, until the 2016
election, conservatives failed to message their solutions to America's poverty. I personally felt that
the author spent an exceeding amount of time discussing and outlining the Doe Fund and its impact.
I felt that the author was idealistic at best in putting forward a "reasonable" ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I sincerely doubt if he has ever submitted a "Request for Proposal" in contract bidding and the
mandated requirements for personnel services contracts. This mandated increase in minimum wages
was entirely for show and in effect impacted only those HUB Zone and other minority businesses
who sought out government contracts while employing low skill level (custodial, cashiers, etc....)
contracts. It is required by law to provide a variety of health, leave (annual and sick) under law
(Reg. 29 CFR 4.173) often referred to as "fringe

Compare And Contrast Conservative And Conservative
During the late 1920's and 1930's, the government of the United States followed both conservative
and liberal policies. Conservatives policies of the 20th century were small government action and
limited regulation of the economy. Liberal policies of the 20th century were regulation of the
economy and the use of government for social welfare. The presidents during this time, Herbert
Hoover and Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR), practiced these policies during their terms. Some of
Herbert Hoover's policies followed liberal ideals and some of FDR's policies followed conservative
ideals, however; Herbert Hoover was primarily a conservative president and Franklin Roosevelt was
primarily a liberal president.
In the 1928 presidential election, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At times in their individual terms, Hoover could be classified as a liberal and Roosevelt could be
classified as a conservative. Hoover increased the government spending to stimulate the economy.
He is spending money to increase the amount of public works and construction available for
Americans. Under Hoover, the federal construction work rate went from $275,000,000 a year to
$750,000,000. (Doc C). In another speech, "other construction work of the government will exceed
$520,000,000." (Doc B). In multiple speeches, Hoover says that he will increase government
spending to strengthen the economy to fix the fallen economy. He has passed legislature that follows
this. In 1929, the massive Boulder Dam construction started. This created jobs and led to
agricultural expansion. At times, Roosevelt represent the beliefs and ideals of a conservative. He
says he is going to cut the cost of current federal government operations by 25 percent.(Doc E).
Limiting government spending is commonly associated with conservatives. He also said that he
doesn't want to increase taxes if he can. Raising taxes is associated with liberals and his statement is
the opposite of that. At times, Hoover and Roosevelt switched from their primary ideological
viewpoints and represented the opposing

To What Extent Was the Period of Conservative Rule 1951-64...
This essay will examine the impact of the Conservative party during their period in office between
1951 and 1964. The assessments by historians of these thirteen years vary widely as the
Conservative rule left behind a mixed feeling about its achievements. We will therefore be
discussing to what extent their period in office can be described as "thirteen years wasted", based on
their performances in the political, economic and social sectors. When the Conservative Party came
to power in 1951, they won the election by a slim majority of 26 seats, leaving them with very little
power to make important changes. However, their number of seats increased throughout their
thirteen years in office, leaving them with a majority of 107 in the 1959 ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Dig for Victory campaign reminded people of the importance of agriculture.
The Conservatives also focused on several aspects of the social sector by putting into place
important extensions to the Welfare State. These include the increase of benefits and the
implementation of the Mental Health Act which spread awareness of mental illness and increased its
social acceptance, which was a huge step towards tolerance which was ahead of its time. However
the plan to build 90 new hospitals across Britain never came into action as the Labour government
had retaken office in 1964. Despite this, the improvements in healthcare can be seen as a big success
for the Conservatives, although, yet again it can be said that they could have done much more in
their thirteen years in this sector.
Progress was also made in the area of education as 6000 new schools and 11 new universities were
constructed and many more were expanded. However their was a big debate about the merits of
comprehensive and grammar schools. The Conservatives, who supported grammar schools for most
of their time in office finally gave into the inevitable fact that comprehensive education did offer
certain advantages that grammar schools did not. The time that the Conservatives spent preventing
county councils from introducing comprehensive systems was therefore counter–productive and a
waste of time.
Last but not

Should Brahm Be Considered A Conservative Or Conservative...
A controversial topic in music history is the question: Should Brahms be considered a conservative
or progressive composer? It is a difficult question to answer, with many different things to take into
account. In this essay I will try and explore various points of view on this topic, with reference to
musical examples, and then come to a conclusion with which argument I personally believe to be the
truest of them all. Brahms was a composer at a time of great change in the world of music. He was
at the tipping point at which the classical era was coming to an end and the romantic era was just
beginning. The composers typically considered progressives were the advocates of the Romantic
Movement; the composers who were considered conservative wanted to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Brahms wanted to progress music further, but with it's foundations set strongly in the work of the
classical and baroque period composers. He wanted to, and he did, expand, develop, and
reinvigorate the classical style of music. Wagner, Liszt, and other composers were the beginning of a
new period in music. They revolutionised music and the progress they made has had an everlasting
effect. Just because Brahms was not part of this movement does not mean he did not contribute to
the progress of music. He developed Symphonies to a stage they had very rarely seen before. His
work influenced the development of future symphonies, and that is progress. Brahms managed to be
a progressive composer in a conservative form of music. So to say Brahms was both a conservative
and progressive composer is a valid opinion.
Throughout this essay I have explored the various different ways in which you can view Brahms: a
misunderstood progressive, a stubborn conservative, or perhaps a progressive in a style
unappreciated at the

Conservative Opinion On Immigration
Next I will talk about the Issue of Immigration from the conservative standpoint. Conservatives
opinion on immigration is very clear. According to Student New Daily, conservatives, "Support
legal immigration only. Oppose amnesty for those who enter the U.S. illegally" ("Conservative Vs
Liberal", paragraph 12). This means that conservatives want immigrants to be a part of our great
country, but do not want people who came here illegally to get citizenship. One big point is that
Conservative think the borders should be secure before dealing with illegal immigrants. Presidential
Candidate Donald J Trump has stated, "The US has become a dumping ground for everyone else's
problems" (Presidential announcement). This is from his speech announcing

Essay about The Ten Principles of Conservatism
Conservatives believe communities can provide structure for the natural change that they believe
should be the real way of progress and that communities are capable of providing a counter force
against the concentrated power within the government (Dunn, iii). Thus, community must be near
the top in a list of fundamental conservative tenets, and community is the third in this list of ten
principles of conservatism (Dunn, iii). Conservatives believe that within the community there are
the private and voluntary organizations people can join and be a part of which can help humans
grow and flourish (Dunn, iii). This view reveals why conservatives can view the community as such
an important part in the lives of individuals.
The fourth item in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Conservatives believe citizens should think more about what they could and should do for
themselves instead of thinking about what the government could do for them (Dunn, iii–iv). The fear
is that the central government would end up controlling more and that there would be social and
moral decay (Dunn, iii–iv).
The sixth tenet of conservatism is that democracy, in the minds of conservatives, occurs within the
"context of a constitutional order carefully designed not only to limit and separate governmental
power, but also to refine democratic opinion and encourage deliberation" (Dunn, iv). Conservatives
see that the Constitution outlines precise government activity, and so conservatives are in favor of a
strict interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. This means that conservatives want
courts to interpret the law as it is written instead of making the law. That would better keep the
original intentions of the framers of the Constitution intact by keeping the tradition and natural
change instead of injecting one's own views to cause change (Dunn, iv).
Property and its ownership, according to the seventh tenet, are important because they encourage
individuals to care more about society. They care more because they have a greater investment in it
(Dunn, iv). Conservatives suggest that because individuals are tied to their community in this solid
way, there is a greater chance that they will function responsibly and desire to preserve the social
order

Texas Conservative
Ambrose Bierce quote, "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as
distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others" relates to the two political
parties, in America. Bierce was a novel writer and based on his quote I think he was a liberal. His
quote defines a conservative and a liberal in a very unsubtle way which can be misleading to some
even though it is true. Texas is known as a conservative state and California is known as a liberal
state. Texas has been a conservative state since 1944 and Democrats haven't been able to win it
since. Two Presidents of the United States are from Texas and were from the Republican Party.
Many believe that Texas became conservative when people started moving West, moving West was
not a really smooth process back in the days. This takes us to the Frontier heritage when people had
to cope with a lot of issues because of the move towards West. This made people angry at the
government and caused distrust and anger towards the government, the government wanted to make
changes to some of the old ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, marijuana is legal in California and is still not legalized in Texas even for medicinal
purposes, abortion in Texas is legal only till 20 weeks after fertility whereas in California abortion is
legal till after viability. Same is true for LGBT rights, Texas did not legalize LGBT marriages until
the supreme court ruled that all states had to make it legal. Also many support gun laws in Texas
whereas liberals such as California are against gun laws. These are the significant differences seen
in conservative and liberal political cultures in the United

Differences Between The Conservative Parties Policies And...
In Great Britain, there are several key political parties such as the Conservative Party, the Labour
Party, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party. Each of these parties have many different views,
ideologies and policies that they believe would make Britain the best that it could be. However only
one of the many parties are able to get into government and implement what they believe to be the
best policies for the people of Britain. In this essay I will be looking at the differences between the
Conservative Parties policies and the Labour Parties policies as each of these parties have very
different views in how Great Britain should be governed. The Conservative Party are a very right
wing party and the Labour Party are a very left wing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Conservative party believes that the tax in Britain is too low and should be increased. They
believe that every household should pay a proportionate amount of tax based on the amount they
receive in income. The Conservatives are looking to introduce a policy where they cut income tax
for families allowing them to keep more of the money that they earn. This will provide households
with a better chance of providing for their families as they will have more money to put towards
them. (The Conservative Party Website, 2016) The Labour Party has a very different view on the
way that the people of Britain should be taxed. They believe that British households should be taxed
more if they earn over a certain amount of money. In Labours 2015 party manifesto they claim that
they would make a fairer tax system where if people earned over £150,000 a year then they would
pay more in tax. (The Labour Party Website, 2016) This would mean that the people who earn less
would be able to keep more of their money as they would not be paying as much tax as the people
who earn more and in theory it would make the poorer wealthier. The difference between the
Conservative Party and the Labour Party's view on tax is rather different. The Conservative party
take the approach that everyone should pay tax but everyone will all pay the same amount whereas
the Labour Party want to increase the

The Conservative Party Government Era During 1951-1964
The Conservative Party Government Era during 1951–1964 is a period which has been politically
criticized throughout the years specifically that of Britain Politics. During this time, the
Conservative government was said to have pursued mainly Keynesian economic policies which was
centrally focused on reducing inflation, to maintain growth and promote stability but despite the
Conservatives attempts to revive the Britain economy through industrialism, increase standard of
living and encouragement for consumerism there was the development of a stagnant economy which
eventually produced an increase in unemployment, inflation and interest rates for consumer products
and loans. The Labour government described the period of 1951–64 as "Thirteen Wasted Years" as
they felt that during this period Britain experienced economic chaos and turmoil. This was quite the
opposite view for that of the Conservatives, particularly Macmillan who expressed in his speech that
the people had "... never had it so good" and encouraged his supporters and opponents to "... Go
around the country, go to industrial towns, go to the farms and you will see a state of prosperity such
as we have never had before... " This research paper will make reference to Andrew Boxer Thirteen
Wasted Years and Dominic Sandbrook Never Had It So Good to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In his extract Shanks evaluates that despite the economic process in the opportunities to the people
there was in fact no real growth placing Britain in the notion of being economically stagnant as the
nation known for its shop–keepers and industrialization was in financial crises which seemed
beyond repair despite efforts made. Shanks exerts confirms the researcher stance that problems
which were to be seen as of vital importance were on the back burning and other political ideas
placed on the forefront as

Conservative Views On Liberal And Conservative
I am far from being certain about how liberal or conservative I am or will be. Growing up I had a
very conservative mother and liberal father, so I like to believe that I fall somewhere in the middle.
There are concepts from the liberal side, mostly involving equality among individuals that I support.
There are also conservative concepts that I side with as well, such as limited government and...
However, at my age (21) I am still figuring out which specific values I favor other others. There is a
motto out there that insists on not determining your opinions deffinate until at least thirty and I
couldn't agree more. Earlier in the semester our class was asked if young people could handle the
responsibility of being a congressman or president. I don't believe a single person agreed that it
would be a good idea to have someone of a young age making decisions for a large sum of people.
This is because we are just now coming face to face with things like voting, taxes, and loans. As we
acquire more and more knowledge, our views on topics change and eventually this shapes our
character and public ideology. With the help of media I and my peers contribute to public opinion
with our "posts" being broadcasted daily on issues and current events. I am glad to say that
instagram, snapchat and twitter have done an excellent job grabbing the attention of many
generations to keep our nation informed. Unfortunately not everything posted is credible or true, but
at least it sheds light a

Essay On Conservative Words
There are so many words in the English language. Although there are words that have the same
meaning from one culture to the next, there are still some which do not. Words can be used to
convey different things. They have characteristics of their own. In fact many of their characteristics
can be illustrated through how they are used in sentences or conversations. Therefore, using these
following words democratic, bigot, feminist, conservative and liberal we look at ways in which
demonstrate their characteristics through illustration . Democractic The word democratic is derived
from the word democracy which represents a people formed and operated government system.
Additionally, the word democratic is more commonly used to distinguish between the two main
political parties in the United States. This word has also been associated with a picture symbol of a
donkey covered ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Feminist are female in gender. She is someone that believes in women being treated as equals to
men. She also believes that women can do anything that a man can do such as jobs that have usually
been held by men in society. Therefore, she should be paid the same as a man. Feminist all so
believe that women should be allowed to fight along side of men in the military and other branches
of the armed forces. Conservative The word conservative is used to describe someone who has their
own set of values and ideal that tend to be more traditional that many others. A conservative person
does do well in adapting and adjusting to change. Conservatives are people who are narrow minded
and do not like to bend or deviate from there stance on things. They believe in empowerment and
holding individuals accountable. Additionally, they are not in favor of the government controlling
things. They believe that people should have more power than the government over their lives or
concerning things that affect their lives.

Conservatives vs. Liberals
Conservatives vs. Liberals Conservatives are very supportive for individuals that are in the higher
class, while liberals support the lower class individuals in society. Conservatives and Liberals have
completely different views from one another. I personally favor liberalist views due to the fact they
favor equality within our society. While conservatives feel as though within a society everyone
should be responsible for themselves they don't believe in aid to mankind. In our society we can
achieve and do so much more if everyone as a whole worked together and cared about the individual
next to them. The world that we live in today would but much stronger, there would be less poverty
and more equality in the working class. Due ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Conservatives simply feel as though the government should have nothing to do with healthcare.
They believe that every American have the ability to get healthcare, just who will pay for it.
Liberalists are also for same sex marriage, they believe that marriage is the union of two individuals
who are in love no matter what the sex of

THE LABOUR PARTY LOST 4 GENERAL ELECTIONS
BETWEEN 1979AND...
THE LABOUR PARTY LOST 4 GENERAL ELECTIONS BETWEEN 1979AND 1992. THE
CONSERVATIVE PARTY LOST 3 GENERAL ELECTIONS BETWEEN 2005. WHY?
An extract from Arthur Marwick– "British Society Since 1945":
The fall of Labour Party: the labour government has had a very difficult time leading to the general
elections of 1979. The years between 1976–79 proved to be intense ones, filled with economic
problems, intensified with labour movements looking to rejuvenate. This led to the party changing
some of it's policies and its position changed. The changes led to a division in the party: some
members' saw the party was being radicalised; therefore, they opted out of the party.
The government saw unemployment grew, inflation was at an annual 8.6 percent, ... Show more
At this particular time, the country needed a new direction, and it needed to be saved from the
problems created by the Labour government.
The rise of Thatcher in contrast of her optimism, country's pessimism, force of personality. PR of
Thatcher (Saatchi and Saatchi) and effective campaign electioneering (Labour isn't working poster),
vague policies such as economics meant she could bandwagon popular policies when necessary,
united party (thanks to Whitelaw) in comparison to Labour.
The Conservatives main tactic was to hammer away at unpopularity of the government – "LABOUR
ISN'T WORKING" campaign poster playing on unemployment and law and order.
These reasons led to the Conservatives winning the 1979 elections, the beginning of Labours
nightmare.
Thatcher's led government was able to soften unemployment hardship 1982–3 (at 3 million). The
Falklands war played a great role in preparing the way for success in 1983 elections: Falklands
helped increased self confidence and grasp of the Conservative party, leading to a rise in opinion
polls and a patriotic mood washing through Britain, rise of patriotism and support of the
government. The war also wrong footed the opposition
Labour's lack of credibility affected the party's fortune. Foot acted as a principled opposition party,
but no one could imagine him being the leader of the government of the day. His Labour's election
manifesto was

Are Conservatives Racist
The word racist has been labeled to a specific type of people. According to the Merriam Webster
racist is defined as, "a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other
races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another." These people have also been
classified as conservatives. The question that I present in this essay is why conservatives are seen as
racist? This question will be answered with both perspectives of the Liberals and the Conservatives.
With their inputs I can as the writer have a better understanding on this matter. The articles that I
present are very bias filled in which so I present two of the opposite opinion to balance out. The
bumper sticker that is the inspiration for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From the conservative point of view, they have stated this label of racist or bigot t has been
bestowed on them due to the Liberals. As www.thefederalists.com a news website says, "Liberals
Need Racist Foes to Vanquish." He states the liberals use the "race card" to attack conservative he
does agree with the fact there are bad people in any group and how there is the Misrepresentation of
a community, but questioned that liberals hadn't walked away from the past and all of this is
counterproductive. Which implies that conservative or the author of this article thinks liberals need
some racist enemy to fight against. Even after the post–Civil right movement. Conservatives are
convinced that liberals hold on to those events as some fuel to push their agenda. It is said that
liberals are so proud of their achievements in the Civil Rights Movement it is all they have to
combat the conservatives. Which is acknowledged, yet thought of repetitive; as stated in Why
Liberals Think Consumer Are Racist, "Everyone Hates Reruns." Many conservatives have
recognized the tragedies and Injustice during the Civil Rights Movement, but unlike the Liberals,

Liberal Or Conservative Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Laura Torres

More from Laura Torres (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Liberal Or Conservative Analysis