The cultures described are remote and spend most of their time living outdoors with limited resources and opportunities for progression, in contrast to the author's own culture. Both cultures lack integration with social media and modern living, and were created by lacking progression to make life easier through things like economics. Integrating them fully may require persuasion but any integration should only occur if the cultures are willing.

1. Kwesi Wilkerson
Remote Cultures
1) Overall Impression of both cultures
My overall impression of both cultures is that they are both distant and extravagant
because of how remote they are.
2) Implications (social, political, legal, religious, economics, others)
socially: they only are both in contact with those who live they same culture as them
politically: they both obtain and follow no specific laws but their own.
economically: The nomads move from place to place using the outdoor resources and
foods
The hillbilly from west Virginia lacked in having an economical advantage
3) How do they compare to yours
Compared to mine they don't have near as many resources or opportunities to progress
in life.
4) Similarities between both cultures
both are unknown to the social media world
both spend most of living outdoors
5) How do you think those cultures were created
they were both created by a lack of progression to make living easier
6) What would it take to integrate those cultures to ours, should we?
it would take a lot of persuasive information and we shouldn't if they are not willing.
We should always allow the the opportunity to integrate.