The Csi Effect On Crime

The Csi Effect On Crime
The CSI Effect
Introduction
Have you ever watched a crime scene drama on television and now believe you are a forensic
science expert? This is what you call the "Crime Scene Investigation Effect (CSI)". It came into
light in the early 2000's. In 2008, Monica Robbers, an American criminologist, defined the CSI
Effect as, "the phenomenon in which jurors hold unrealistic expectations of forensic evidence and
investigation techniques, and have an increased interest in the discipline of forensic science".
(Economist 2010) Millions are watching these CSI drama TV shows. In 2012–13, NCIS: Naval
Criminal Investigative Service, was named the most popular watched television program in
America, bringing in more viewers than Sunday Night Football according to Mancini, author of The
"CSI Effect" In an Actual Juror Sample: Why Crime Show Genre May Matter.
Within this paper, I will clarify more about the CSI effect, previous studies on crime–show–viewing
habits and a related theory of justice relevant to class.This topic is important to our justice system
because people are being found not guilty or being acquitted because of the lack of forensic
evidence in jury trials. It is unethical for jurors who watch these shows and base real criminal trials
on fictional CSI shows that use fantasy technology and sometimes unnecessary forensic science.
CSI Effect
The explosion of crime and justice topics throughout all forms of media has led some to suggest that
a "CSI Effect" has taken hold of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Does CSI Effect Influence Jury Verdicts?
Introduction Maeder, et al. (2016) defined "CSI effect" as the unreasonable expectations of jurors on
the sophistication of forensic science as a consequence of learning about it through television
programs, such as the CSI (Crime Scene Investigation), resulting to fewer convictions in the absence
of sophisticated forensic evidence against the accused. Lobo and Schnobrich–Davis (2015) referred
to this as "Tech effect", which essentially extends the definition into the advances in information
dissemination technology and beyond 'crime scene television shows'.
Article Summary Research questions: The Lobo and Schnobrich–Davis (2015) study was guided by
three research questions: (1) Does CSI effect (as Tech effect) influence jury verdicts? (2) Does CSI
effect less ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although Lobo and Schnobrich–Davis (2015) managed to remove the unrealistic use of non–jury
qualified respondents in their study, methodological weaknesses are evident. First, 81 percent of the
participants had not experienced a jury service, which cannot connect their answers with their actual
jury verdicts in real cases. Second, the evidence presented is not clear in terms of direction. Are
these evidence supporting guilt or no guilt? Without a clear evidential direction, there is no control
in the weight of evidence towards conviction or acquittal. Moreover, are these evidence taken from a
real case in each scenario? Otherwise, lack of realism in evidence will be a confounding factor in the
study. Third, defining "tech" or "CSI" as technological skill established no clear connection between
technological skills and knowledge or belief in crime scene science and technology. A potential jury
maybe technologically skillful but has no interest in crime scene technology. Or, a less skillful
citizen technologically may have strong interest in following CSI and similar

The Csi Effect Speech
Throughout the semester, I have enjoyed taking the "communication matters" course and learning
more about writing speeches and writing a speech about my choice of persuasive topic. I have
chosen to write about "The CSI effect", which is a theme in the crime and forensics fields.
The topic interested me as I have an interest in criminal justice, psychology as well as the science of
forensics. After I picked the topic, I made sure to do research and look at academic sources to make
sure I had true and valid information about "The CSI effect". I had known only so much information
at the beginning of the semester when I had originally picked the topic. I had known what "The CSI
effect" was and the definition of it, as well as what some of the details that have and can make the
show ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Service dogs help some see, some with their balance, such in the case with Marjalissa's husband,
some with their blood sugars, seizures, etc. Optimally, helping to keep their handlers safe and away
from harm. I found it interesting that service dogs can be trained and with those who have various
types of disabilities. I understood that there were alert dogs for those who have diabetes and who
were blind or were unable to see properly. I was unaware of how many disabilities that service dogs
can be trained for. It was intriguing of how
Marjalissa used personal details in her speech and her husband, his service dog, and his disability, of
which required his service dog.
I also enjoyed the introduction, which was attention grabbing on a news story, where a service dog
was no longer able to serve, due to the emotionally disturbing experience from being attacked from
the other dog who was a fake service dog and not properly trained or certified. It is upsetting how
many think it is alright to bring a fake service dog into public, where it potentially hurt others and
their service

CSI Effect-Does It Still Exist: A CSI Study
The topic that I had researched about being "The CSI Effect– Does It Still Exist" which was written
by Donald E. Shelton. In a study conducted by Shelton (2009), an honorable judge and author, it
was found that per responses of a 2006 week after week Nielsen rating: 30 million people viewed
CSI on one night. 70 million viewed no less than one of the three CSI show and 40 million watched
two other forensic dramas, Without a Trace and Cold Case (p. 34). The significance of this study is
that it demonstrates exactly what number of people watch these criminal investigations show all the
time and this is useful in deciding how far–reaching the CSI effect is. Based on these reactions a
later study was directed in which they found that "in the "each ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In case, you're a regular investigation show viewer you may trust that the crime procedure is
extremely fast, the specialists show up, accumulate prove, run that evidence in a data bank and
instantly have their criminal however it simply does not unfold that effectively. Kulmala (2013) says
that, "The television viewing public can turn to either network or cable television on any given night
and find a variety of forensic–based programs. These programs showcase stylish technicians using
the latest technology to piece together a crime scene's unknown variables in less than 60 minutes"
(para. 5). Viewers are repetitively exposed to episodes where DNA test results are reported in 15
minutes or less and fingerprints are matched to prints in law enforcement databases almost
immediately. Botluk (2005) goes ahead to state much a greater amount of the unreasonable parts of
criminal examination indicates when she communicates the possibility that "In the rare instance
where the suspect does not confess to the crime, the viewers are exposed to these same stylish
technicians as expert witnesses" (para. 4). When it comes to time span and innovation these shows
are far more progressed than we now are also, in a matter of an hour a crime is submitted,
researched, and comprehended with innovation that is essentially out of this

CSI Effect
Law enforcement officials perceive due to the increase in the number of Crime Scene Investigations
(CSI) and courtroom shows loosely based on reality, there is a phenomenon called "The CSI effect."
The CSI Effect describes an ideology where non–fiction CSI television shows crime solving
methods are now the standard by which real ordinary citizens expect crimes to be solved. In this
essay, I will focus on three perceived, yet not scientifically proven effects. The impact of law–
oriented entertainment programming, such as Perry Mason, LA Law, and
The People's Court, on the public (Podlas, K.) have caused its television viewing audiences to
believe they are now experts of crime scene investigation based on limited information received.
Search ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
No longer can a cold case exists when CSI shows have proven that with minimum detective work,
all we need is forensics and proof for instant results. The legal system confronts two interrelated
objectives: truth and justice (Tyler, T.). Law enforcement officials must gather the evidence and
identify suspects to assist in telling the story of truth before justice can be served. Understandingly,
there is a frustration when crimes go unsolved. We as a society expect to receive and benefit from
receiving closure from identifying the perpetrator as well as punishing such person(s) for the crime
committed. More importantly, a community feels safe when it knows that criminals are not walking
freely amongst law abiding citizens and are not able to commit more

The CSI Effect
Law enforcement officials perceive due to the increase in the number of Crime Scene Investigations
(CSI) and courtroom shows loosely based on reality, there is a phenomenon called "The CSI effect."
The CSI Effect describes an ideology where non–fiction CSI television shows crime solving
methods are now the standard by which real ordinary citizens expect crimes to be solved. In this
essay, I will focus on three perceived, yet not scientifically proven effects. The impact of law–
oriented entertainment programming, such as Perry Mason, LA Law, and
The People's Court, on the public (Podlas, K.) have caused its television viewing audiences to
believe they are now experts of crime scene investigation based on limited information received.
Search ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As recent high–profile criminal trials make clear, the evidence available at the trial can rarely put to
rest all doubt as to the guilt or innocence (Tyler, T.). The uncertainly about the truth makes it more
difficult to achieve justice in a psychologically satisfactory manner (Tyler, T.).
A real life example is that within the past five years or so, Wausau Police have noticed that people
who report crimes are now holding law enforcement to higher standards. While that's not necessarily
a bad thing, it can create quite a headache for officers when that standard is only attainable in the
world of television (Anderson, M.). "Its individuals that do watch those shows, that do believe that
we should be bringing in our CSI team, or our forensic team or the crime lab for a minor theft," said
Chief Jeff Hardel (Anderson, M.).
CSI shows offer a more finite resolution, which, can lead its viewing audience and taxpayers, to
expect its real life law enforcement officials immediately solve crimes. Often times, forensic
evidence is limited, and those very members of society who demand such resolve are hesitant to
participate in the crime solving process as witnesses.

Forensic Science in the 21st Century
AJS/592
Aug 2012
Forensic science is regarded as an essential component in the resolution of crimes and law
enforcement. Collecting and deciphering evidence properly and preserving crime scenes are two of
the most important elements in crime–solving. Consequently, technological advances are relevant to
the limited and challenging forensic science field. Also, it is a field wherein technical aptitude is
attained only by the amalgamation of various dynamics. For example, supervision, continuing
education, proficiency, training, experience, coupled with appreciativeness of scientific ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, forensic science executes not only its customary role of surmising what transpired at a
crime scene criminal involvement, but also gives exhaustively to spawning investigative clues and
directing, testing, and redirecting investigative lines. In this function, forensic science adds to the
assembly of timely and applicable investigative and intelligence information on terrorist groups and
clandestine cells. Additionally, this warrants enhanced and specialized forensic analysis, information
sharing, and traditional forensic science tools. These innovative tools are being created
predominantly by the United States' defense and intelligence communities, with every community
altering the innovative tools to its specialized missions and needs (The National Academy Press,
2012). Another homeland security forensic science component is located in the Office of the
Director of National Intelligence, which organizes the Intelligence Community's different
components. Also, inside that agency is a National Counter–proliferation Center that toils in bio–
forensics. The substantial risk of the development, procurement, and exploitation of weapons of
mass destruction has steered U.S. government organizations toward cultivating innovative forensic
science competencies (Cooke, 2007). This development initiated the creation of a dedicated forensic
hazardous materials division in the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory in 1996.
Furthermore, the

The CSI Effect and its Implications in Forensic Science Essay
The definition of forensic science is any scientific research, method, or theory used to analyze
evidence in an attempt to solve legal cases (Cho). In recent years, there has been growing public
interest in forensic science, arguably because of the numerous television programs that glamorize its
practices. This phenomenon is part of what is known as the CSI effect, or the process through which
devoted fans of popular crime dramas develop unrealistic notions of forensic science methods,
practices, and their applications in real life cases (Mancini 544; Stevens 37; Ley, Jankowski, and
Brewer 52). The CSI effect has had more negative impacts on forensic science and society than
positive impacts, especially in regards to what goes on in the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
These scenes dramatize the lab technician's work and make it seem intriguing and thrilling. This
results in the intense obsession of viewers and their conviction that the images presented in these
scenes are representative real life. Dante Mancini also refers to what is known as the strong
prosecutor's effect in his article "The 'CSI Effect' in an Actual Juror Sample: Why Crime Show
Genre May Matter". The strong prosecutor's effect, as Mancini describes it, is one aspect of the CSI
effect referring to the expectations jurors who frequently watch crime shows have for forensic
evidence (Mancini 544). There are clearly many different aspects and impacts of the CSI effects that
can be positive or negative. There has been a lot of research intending to fully discover the extent of
the CSI effect television that has found its impact to be negative. Of the multitudes of negative
impacts of the CSI effects, among the most prevalent are the unrealistic expectations that viewers
have of DNA and other types of forensic evidence in the courtroom. In Ley, Jankowski, and
Brewer's study, they analyzed a large sample of CSI episodes for their content relating to forensic
science. The study found that that in 94% of all episodes in the sample the detectives used DNA
evidence to solve cases. Also, in 88% of all cases shown, the

The Importance Of The CSI Effect On Crime Scene Investigation
Introduction Television has been around for years making money off of the public's interests.
Starring shows such as CSI Miami, Forensic Files, Cold Case, Bones, and many more demonstrate
the procedures of forensic science at active crime scenes. However, these shows have given the
wrong perception of forensic science and the procedures to investigating an active crime scene.
These television shows have made a lasting impact on the public's perception of Crime Scene
Investigation still today. Often times these shows have made it difficult for judges, attorneys,
lawyers, and juries to understand forensic science. CSI Effect Crime Scene Investigations are
fascinating to the public and have been portrayed on television for many years. These television
shows have influenced how the public perceives the procedures of investigating crime scenes.
Forensic science and investigating a crime scene is a very complex and unique career. Television has
exaggerated and wrongly influenced the perception of forensic science, crime scene investigation,
and procedures in criminalistics. The effect that these crime scene television shows have on the
public is called the CSI Effect (Shelton, 2008). The CSI effect can lead to jurors wrongly acquitting
an individual because they believe the job wasn't thorough enough. There are more than 100 million
viewers who watch television shows about scientific evidence in criminal cases (Shelton, 2008). The
general public assumes what they

The Nerc Effect : The CSI Effect And Juurors
Abstract
The "CSI Effect" refers to the relationship forensic television shows has on a juror's verdict
decision. Throughout the literature on the "CSI Effect", there is a discrepancy on whether or not it
actually exists. This effect causes jurors to have unrealistic high expectations of forensic science
during a trial and affect jurors' willingness to convict without some piece of evidence. A solution
proposed to overcome this effect is to ask certain question at the voir dire, which will identify jurors
who have been influenced by forensic science television shows, to remove them from the jury
selection process before the start of a trial. A second solution is creating jury instructions on how
much the investigations in real–life are different from the investigations they see on TV to correct
any misinformation and facilitate learning.
Keywords: CSI effect, forensic science television shows, jurors
The CSI Effect
The "CSI Effect" refers to the belief that juror's expectations about forensic evidence at trial are
changing due to the popularity of forensic science television shows such as CBS's CSI: Crime Scene
Investigation ( Kim, Barak, & Shelton, 2009; Hayes–Smith & Levett, 2011) . CSI is one of the most
popular shows on network television, consistently ranking and spawning several spin–off shows.
These shows depict crime scene investigators using highly technical procedures to recover
microscopic evidence that ultimately reveals the details of the

The CSI Effect: Unrealistic Expectations Of Forensic Evidence
The CSI effect is shows such as CSI or other criminal shows and the influences jurors to have an
unrealistic expectation of forensic evidence. It is estimated that over 60 million people watch the
show CSI every week. Furthermore, there has been an increase in the number of graduates from
forensic sciences programs; in 1999 West Virginia University had 4 graduates for the forensic
science program and in 2004 that number had increased to over 400 students. According to Hayes
and Levett the analyses of popular media shows that the media portrays the effect as a real problem,
and research surveying the legal community indicates that they believe the CSI Effect exists and
may change their investigation and trial strategies accordingly.
The main reason for the CSI effect being bad is simply because the jury expects high level of
evidence to be brought forth when in many cases all that evidence is not available to them and many
of the science that they show in shows such as CSI, criminal Minds, NCIS, Law and Order and
many more does not even exist. These jurors have unrealistic demands for physical ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jurors believe that having DNA tests, hand writing analyses and even gun shot residue are important
to convict someone when these are not always relevant to a case.
For instance, we all remember the Casey Anthony trial during the summer of 2011. This was the
case that the mother Casey Anthony was on trial for the murder of her two– year –old daughter,
Caylee Marie Anthony. Many people were outranged with the not guilty verdict that she had
received. The circumstantial evidence that the prosecution had presented seemed to be strong
enough to receive at least one guilty verdict of the three offenses. The medias explanation for the
acquittal was due tot the CSI Effect because one juror on the case stated that there was not enough
physical evidence to find her

The CSI Effect
Crime sells, just think of the last time you were watching a movie, the only thing you probably
remember is the action. Action scenes are what defines a movie, if the action scene was awful, then
the chances of it being a good movie are slim. Crime science investigators, CSI, Law & Order,
Criminal Intent and countless others all portray this image that cases are solved overnight. Due to
their wide spread popularity these shows have had a significant effect on the criminal justice system,
law enforcement named it the CSI Effect. The CSI Effect is the exaggerated portrayal of forensic
science on crime television shows such as CSI: Crime Scene Investigation influences public
perception. These fictional T.V shows have portrayed an image that the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Social control is the way society reacts to behavior and people it considers as deviant, problematic,
worrying, threatening, troublesome or undesirable in some way or another. There are three different
types of social control: private, parochial, and public. The most basic form of social control is at the
private level. This is also referred to as a primary form of social control. At the private level social
control is carried out by family, friends, and other informal social groups that have the capacity to
exercise social control through criticism, praise, ostracism, and even violence. The second form of
social control is at the parochial level and is also known as secondary social control. At the parochial
level social control is exercised by community organizations such as schools, churches,
neighborhood groups, and businesses that often have a stake in individual behavior, but do not have
the same sentimental attachment as those at the private level. Social control levied by those at the
parochial level, for example, can take the form of a verbal reprimand by a neighbor or sanctions
meted out by a school principal or church ofﬁcial. The third form of social control is exercised at the
public level. At the public level social control is exercised by governmental organizations such as
the police and regulatory agencies. This form of social control is often called to action when other
strategies exercised by the private and parochial levels have

The Csi Effect On The Minds Of Jurors
The CSI Effect is becoming to take it's place in courtrooms and the prosecutors aren 't liking it.
Prosecutors are feeling there is no hope for getting a conviction when it's come to the CSI Effect
because they believe that it has control over the juror's applying justice to criminal. The CSI Effect
is being criticized for not allowing prosecutors a fair chance at a conviction in a jury trial for the
belief that Jurors are influenced by what they see on T.V shows and how they believe that the use of
forensic science should be used more to prove a person guilty of a crime. The CSI Effect is to be
determined if whether or not it can affect the way a case is determined in the eyes of the jury.
The CSI Effect is said to have poisoned the minds of jurors and their expectations of presenting
evidence by the forensic science T.V. shows like CSI (Crime Scene Investigators) influence their
perceptions of jurors being able to provide forensic evidence. "Using the fact that Hollywood could
determine the outcome of case by letting the guilty go free, but in a society where the criminal
justice system has convicted many people who was innocent." (McRobert's, Mills, & Possley, 2005,
P. 1). Juror's have demanded the use of forensic science for forensic evidence in criminal trials
which means that prosecutors will have to provide more of the proof of juror's to get a conviction.
CSI Effect believe that crimes show such as CSI have little to no affect on juror's actions to make a

CSI Effect Essay
The CSI Effect is when jurors wrongfully acquit guilty defendants when no scientific evidence is
presented (Neubauer, 2014 pg 370). Not until the 1990's many techniques for forensics were not
known to regular people, only scientist and criminal lawyers knew the procedures. That was until
Hollywood started to have dramas about crime, and forensics on television. Crime Scene
Investigation was very popular, drawing in ten to thirty million viewers a week. While many did not
watch any of the crime shows, it is significant to jurors that did. Although Schweitzer and Saks in
2007, found that forensic evidence presented in a trial to CSI viewers, any evidence they were
shown was less believable than to people who did not watch CSI. Even with those findings, the
verdicts of both CSI watchers, and non ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to the National Institute of Justice 46% of jurors expect some type of evidence presented.
With almost it being half of all jurors I do believe the CSI Effect exists. Personally, if I was a juror
in a criminal case I would want to see some type of proof whether it's visual, physical, or scientific
that shows the defendant is guilty. I do not take an "eye witness" because sometimes people cannot
be trusted. Without having any kind of evidence it can be detrimental for law enforcement and
prosecutors. They can believe they have the right guy, and they very could have the right person.
Yet, without evidence the defendant's defence can be that prosecutors, or law enforcement have no
evidence. From being in many criminal justice classes, most of my teachers have said this, "It is
very hard to prove rape, and hard to not prove rape." Without evidence, especially back in the day
rape was easy to be acquitted from. Now with rape kits, or having some sort of DNA it is easier to
prove someone committed rape. ANother study by the National Institute of Justice found that CSI

Csi Effect Essay
As someone who absolutely loves to watch any sort of crime show CSI: NY and Criminal Minds:
Beyond Borders and 48 Hours; it makes sense that the realities of law enforcement officials can be
distorted. It would be highly boring to watch law enforcement officials just sitting at their desks
doing paperwork. These shows are designed to engage the viewers and keep them wanting to watch
the shows. Truth be told, it is part of the reason I became interested in adding the criminal justice
minor to my educational background. There's an actual term for this called the "CSI Effect, in which
any of several ways in which the exaggerated portrayal of forensic science on crime television
shows". While I'm not sure there is actually a ton of harm done by

The Csi Effect
Many T.V shows come on and influence the public that the things that take place on these shows are
real. There is Law in Order SVU, 24, Bones and our favorite CSI that make people think that
countless cases are open and close do to outrageous finding of D&A traces. The CSI Effect is a
theory that criminals are getting smarter. These shows give out numerous tactics on how many cases
are cracked and suspects are arrested. The CSI Effect also results in various hang juries and miss
trials due to lack of evidence. The jury is starting to need more evidence, because the influence they
have from watching these television shows. I have seen a show on television called CSI Miami. On
this particular show, there was a murder–taking place with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The prosecutor asked Faber to describe the methods and equipment she had used to make her
analysis. Then she asked Faber what she had found. "My conclusion is that all of those questioned
fibres could have originated from the interior of the Nissan Maxima, from the seats, and/or the
backrests," Faber said. She added that in her field "the strongest association you can say is that 'it
could have come from' " the source in question.
Faber's testimony was careful and responsible–and not very significant. She could not say how
common the automobile fabric that she had examined is, or how many models and brands use it.
Nor could she say how likely it was that the fabric from the car would show up on Wilson's clothes.
Faber used no statistics, because there was no way to establish with any precision the probability
that the fibres came from the detectives' car. DNA tests had proved that blood from one of the
detectives was on Wilson's clothes, and based on this fact, as well as on testimony from his
accomplice and from Faber, Wilson was convicted and sentenced to death. "Given how much
evidence they had in the case, I wasn't crucial," Faber told me. "The prosecutors liked the idea of
fibre evidence in addition to everything else. Maybe they thought the jury would like it because it
was more 'CSI'–esque."(thecsieffect)
The fibres could have come from a different car and was not

Essay On CSI Effect
My name is Brittany Yvette Anderson, and I would be lying if I did not admit that the pre–symptoms
of the CSI effect or not the reason that I I'm studying the major I am now.
Watching the digitalized cut scenes of characters Gil Grissom and Catherine Willows
serendipitously notice a needle head size speckle of blood on the wall fascinated me. Or the way
they could take landline phone recording, and in twenty minutes trace it to a phone booth on 87th
Street, as well as narrow down the voice, and time the individual placed the call all by listening to
the sound of a single mockingbird chirp in the background. I should have realized then that the
authenticity of this show maybe a tad bit questionable. Honestly, there was a bit of comfort ... Show
Being that forensic science focuses on the retrieval of evidence for the court of law, and that in that
court of law people are often judged by a jury of their peers, it is natural that the effects of their day–
to–day world often come into play with their courtroom experience.
The CSI effect is by all accounts a continuously developing issue for the present and future jurors of
the American justice system. As difficult as it might be to believe, there are many individuals out
there that have difficulties dissevering the reality and capability of chemistry, physics, and human
beings, from what they believe and hold to be true in the media. As jurors, these are potentially the
jurors that will begin asking for more proof, or for what valid reason they have not seen certain
evidence items that don't even exist in that particular case. Being that humans are easily influenced,
scrutinizing the proof that has been given can cause a domino effect on other jurors and the decision
they have thought to hold true. According to the National
Institute of Justice, a whopping 46 percent of people had the expectation of evidence in

CSI Effect
Life, Death, and the CSI Effect Picture a crime scene. There are people everywhere looking over the
decapitated body of Anna Martin. The smell of her rotting body infuses the noses of innocent
bystanders. First, the Crime Scene Investigators put yellow crime scene tape up which reads,
"CRIME SCENE DO NOT CROSS." Next, the investigators come rushing over to the body and
snap photos of her, which can be used later on in their investigation. The investigators process the
crime scene and find a lot of valuable evidence, such as DNA, fingerprints, fibers, hairs, and a
footprint, all to be used in court. These people are known as forensic scientists. In a few months the
forensic scientists have found a suspect, James Petty, from all the evidence, ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, jurors start to believe that they are the expert witnesses of the case they are deliberating on all
because of forensic shows. The programs show the characters doing all the work, such as,
investigating, processing the crime scene, photographing the crime scene, and testing the evidence;
these thing don't happen in actual forensics. Forensic Scientists are specialized in what they do. For
instance, one scientist will work photographing the scene, and another will work on processing the
crime scene. Another example would be in the CSI: Miami episode "Collateral Damage", one of the
main characters, Ryan, is seen interviewing suspects and victims and is also seen processing a scene.
Again, forensic scientists only have a single specialization, not many jobs. Also, testing of the
evidence doesn't happen as quickly as it does in the crime shows. For example, it can take hours,
days, and sometimes even weeks for forensic scientists to test the evidence and get a result. The Law
& Order series "portrays a world with inordinately high clearance rates. In the Law & Order
franchise, the hard working detectives always get the perpetrator, and there is seldom an ultimate
error (e.g., wrongful conviction)" (Shniderman 99). In reality, it may take month, maybe even years
to catch a perpetrator. Sometimes the perpetrator isn't even caught and that's why

Overview of the 'CSI Effect' on Criminal Law Proceedings
Introduction Recent years have shown a tremendous increase in media portrayals of crime–related
topics. There had been a rise in the number of crimes reported and analyzed by the media, news
bulletins which abound in crime–related footages and displays, making regular citizens much more
aware of these issues than they would have normally been just through direct exposure. On top of
that, there has been a growing popularity for TV crime series which cover the topic from numerous
perspectives, giving full description of the crime itself, the actors involved, the full investigation
process from beginning to end, specific procedures and terminology used. All this information
which has not usually been readily accessible to the regular citizen has generated an array of studies
carried by both academics and legal practitioners as part of what has come to be known as the CSI
effect. Opinions are generally divided between two groups: those who are extremely worried about
the negative influence of the CSI effect and try to draw serious attention to its dangers, and those
who believe that the CSI effect and the discussions surrounding it are exaggerated and there is in
fact no evidence to support the negative claims to such a high and threatening extent. Before looking
at several cases where the CSI effect has been blamed to have distorted jury verdicts, the paper will
clarify what is understood by the so–called CSI effect, how it is displayed in practice, what exactly it
suggests

CSI Effect
Crime has been an infatuation for people before judicial systems exist. Whether it's by reading
murder mystery stories or watching crime T.V. shows like Perry Mason or Murder She Wrote. Their
fascination is even more evident whenever there's a crime in public. You always see a crowd of
people standing around trying to see the body if it's a homicide or in general just to see what the
police are doing.
In 1948, the professional organization of forensic scientists in America (AAFS) was established
(Lyman, 2014). Members of the AAFS include pathology and biology, toxicology, criminalistics,
questioned documents, and forensic odontology, anthropology, serology, and ballistics (Lyman,
2014). The science advancement in these areas of study ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Based on our findings, jurors were more likely to find a defendant guilty than not guilty even
without scientific evidence if the victim or other witnesses testified, except in the case of rape
(Shelton, 2008). According to my sources all three can't determine whether or not there is a true
"CSI Effect". The Stanford Law Review's conclusion on the topic is very straight forward. "The
discourse among legal actors about the supposed CSI effect is rife with lamentations of the law's
purported inability to provide proof with the strength that jurors supposedly desire.
Whereas the litigation explosion may have resonated with a societal anxiety about relying on law
too heavily, the CSI effect would seem to resonate with anxieties about using law too little,
increasingly abrogating its truth–producing function to science. Whereas the litigation explosion
may have articulated fears of hyperlexis, the CSI effect would seem to give voice to fears of what
we might call "hyperscientia"–too much science" (Cole & Dioso–Villa, 2009). Therefore I can't
determine if jurors are basing their decisions to convict because of this

CSI Effect Essay
The CSI Effect is a term that is used to represent how people relate crime solving television shows
and the real crime scene investigation. The truth is, the real life investigation is far from that shown
on television shows. Most forms of evidence gathered by crime scene investigators, such as fibers,
aren't going to be what puts someone behind bars unless it is compiled with other evidence. Yet
certain evidence can, such as bullets or finger prints, are substantial evidence that is definite.
Although it may not prove that person directly did the crime, it will prove a bullet came from their
gun or that they were obviously at the scene. Shows like CSI usually have certain sayings, such as
"it's a match". However, real crime scene investigators ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, Victor Balthazar, a professor of forensic medicine at the Sorbonne, theorized that "the
grooves inside every gun barrel leave a unique imprint on bullets that pass through it." In other
words, a bullet that has been shot out of a gun has a virtual fingerprint that only that barrel can put
on it. Using the same example as we used before, let's say that in the victim's body, the coroner
noticed that one of the bullets were still inside her body. After extracting the bullet, they do a more
intense investigation and get a good pattern of the "fingerprint" that the barrel gave the bullet. After
the police receive a search warrant for the former lover's home, they find a gun that matches the
caliber of the bullet they found. After examining the gun's barrel, to try to find evidence that it had
recently been shot out of, they will fire a few rounds out of the weapon. If they find that the bullets
shot out of the barrel in their lab have the same markings as that of the bullet extracted from the
woman, than the term "it's a match" could actually be stated. This is true because, based on
Balthazard's theory, no two gun barrels will leave the same imprint on a bullet. This evidence proves
that the bullet was fired out of the weapon that was located at the ex–spouse's home, however the
fibers can't be proven to have come directly from the ex's exact

The CSI Effect: Does It Really Exist?
The CSI Effect: Does it really exist?
The Influence of television on impartial verdicts in jury trials Since the year 2000, CSI has been
among one of television's most popular programs. The show highlights the underbelly of a criminal
investigation, the forensic scientists who investigate mysterious crimes and how they occur. Because
of its popularity people claim that the show causes negative effects. Prosecutors argue that the
programs made convicting dangerous felons more difficult and that the so–called CSI effect exists
even though there is no scientific evidence to support such a hypothesis. "The CSI effect refers to
the notion that in order to convict accused felons, jurors now expect prosecutors to prove scientific
certainty rather than to merely overcome reasonable doubt." (Harriss, 2011) ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
They include: (1) the commission of the crime, where the victim is involved (2) the discovery of the
crime, where the victim is discovered (3) and the beginning of the investigation, where the
investigators become aware of the case and background investigation (4) The phases of the
investigation then begin. The investigator discovers answers that reveal the identity of the
perpetrator and s/he is taken in for questioning. (5) The identification of the perpetrator is then
deemed true or false and if false the true perpetrator is found. (6) The perpetrator is then removed
from society and (7) the investigators resolve the crime and assess the case. (Harriss, 2011) This
viewpoint allows for viewers to uncover the truth within the time slot

The CSI Effect Essay
In 2006, over 100 million people in the United States tuned in to watch either CSI or any if the other
forensic and criminal investigation related television show each week (CJSG). Since then, the
number of viewers has increased rapidly, as well as the amount of television shows with the same
type of theme. As a result of the increase of these television programs, researchers are discovering a
new phenomenon called the 'CSI Effect' that seems to be fueling an interest in forensic science and
criminal investigations nationwide. This effect is actually the ability of criminal justice themed
television shows to influence and increase victims', jurors' and criminals' ideas about forensics,
DNA testing and methods, and criminal investigations ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the past, the jury learned from the forensic scientists' testimony; but now, they're learning from
television and a lot of reality shows. Consequently, what they're learning is not necessarily what is
actually done (Honeycutt). However, those jurors who watch criminal investigation television shows
do believe that what they're seeing on TV is what does go on in real life and they expect to see it in
court. This is because, according to Shelton, "the more frequently jurors watched a given program,
the more accurate they perceived it to be." Unfortunately, these shows also create a false expectation
that clear and definite evidence can be shown for any case, which is not true. Jurors expect every
case to have thorough scientific evidence from the best and most modern technology and to look
exactly as it does on a television show (Shelton). Radford said, "Science does not operate on
certainties." During an investigation, scientists don't ever say that the DNA being tested is a "match"
to the suspect because nothing can ever be a definite match. Instead, their vocabulary consists of
phrases such as

CSI Synthesis Essay
With the first batch of surveyed jurors, the study found that the more often jurors watched a crime
show (in this study CSI was the main crime show in question) the more accurate they thought the
show was. Also, the study found that 46.3% of jurors expected to see some scientific evidence in
every case, 21.9% expected to see DNA evidence in every case, and 36.4% expected to see
fingerprint evidence in every case. With this information, the study found that the jurors who
watched CSI had higher expectations for the presence of scientific evidence compared to the jurors
who did not watch CSI. It is important to note, however, that even though the CSI jurors had higher
expectations those expectations did not equate to higher rates of acquittals ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Judge Shelton explains that even though his study shows no data that the higher expectation for
evidence equates to higher acquittals, he claims that law enforcement personnel still believe that the
CSI Effect on jury outcomes exists and that this belief affects their behavior. In fact, during a report
to Congress, the National Academy of Sciences referenced a study conducted by Saks and stated
that the law enforcement's belief of the CSI Effect affects how prosecutors present evidence in trial.
Because of the crime shows, prosecutors try to make their presentation interesting and appealing
believing that the way the evidence is presented with affect how the jurors see the evidence's
credibility. Also according to Judge Shelton, because of this assumption, prosecutors have been
known to question witness on whether or not they watch shows like CSI as well as tell the jury that
forensic evidence is not part of the state's burden of proof. In the end, Judge Shelton offers an
explanation for jurors' expectations for forensic evidence. He claims that it is a combination of the
CSI Effect, tech effect, and media's portrayal of crime and the criminal justice system which he calls
the media

CSI Effect
It is very important that steps are being taken to mitigate the CSI effect in the courtroom. Many jury
members can have a different perspective on the trial process because of the CSI effect. "The CSI
effect is a belief held primarily among law enforcement personnel and prosecutors that forensic
science television dramas, such as CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, influence American jurors to
expect more forensic evidence to convict defendants of crimes" (Roberts). Unfortunately, the CSI
effect is now a factor within the criminal justice system, and because of this, actions and practices
must be established to declare a fair trial. Specifically, according to the Yale Law Journal, "38
percent of prosecuting attorneys surveyed in Arizona's Maricopa ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Presently, jury members are given instructions to follow in court. These instructions list certain rules
and guidelines for all jury members, and are essential when needing to declare an unbiased
conclusion, yet rarely do they acknowledge the CSI effect. Detective Joe Meyers (Pittsburg
Homicide Unit) stated that, "what we need to find is a solution in the courtroom, how to tell a jury
the difference between what's TV and what's reality" (Ward). The first association to respond the
issue of the CSI effect was The Ohio State Bar Association. This association established in May of
2010 and gave the jury instructions to express the importance in detail the effects that television has
on the court rooms during judgment. It is displayed as

CSI Effect
The CSI Effect is the dramatized representation of forensic science on crime television shows
(Shelton, 2008). The effect was named after the most popular show Criminal Scene Investigation.
These crime television shows impact the audience's perception on how a criminal trial functions
(Shelton, 2008). As the show Criminal Scene Investigation continues to gain millions of viewers, the
audience has began to hold high expectations for evidence in a courtroom (Ericksen, 2017). Many
viewers have began to distance themselves from the reality of the criminal courts procedures
because of these shows. Moreover the CSI has been affecting jurors decisions in court (Ericksen,
2017). Jurors have begun to depend solely on the scientific evidence since crime shows portray that
testimonies hardly matter in a case. The effect is beneficial for the prosecution ... Show more
I do not believe it is wrong for people to watch these shows, but there should be an implementation
of reality when directing them. I remember when I was younger I would watch all these crime
television shows because I wanted to have a career in this field. I always believed the Criminal
Justice System worked exactly as it did on these television shows. Once I got to college and began
to take Criminal Justice classes I realized the portrayal of cases on television were not the same at
all. However an individual can still acquire the basics skills of a case by watching these shows. By
watching these shows I learned the basic functions of a court before I even took Criminal Justice
classes for my major. Therefore the effect may educate jurors on the big picture court's process, but
will still fail to teach them more than that. In order to fix this issue the Criminal Justice System and
directors of these shows should get together and find a way to make these shows accurate. This
would avoid any misconceptions of the court

CSI Effect Essay
Lawson (2009) explains the CSI Effect as the way criminal investigation shows influence the
decisions made by jurors in court. Since these shows portray an unrealistic vision of real–life
scenarios, jurors have unrealistic thoughts about the information presented in front of them. For
example, television shows often suggest that DNA evidence is required for conviction and is easily
and efficiently acquirable (Mallicoat, 2016). However, a rightful conviction can be reached without
any DNA evidence and DNA testing is, in fact, a lengthy process. This misleading portrayal can
possibly cause some jurors to believe that the evidence presented in front of them is not strong
enough, should it not contain any DNA support, distorting their decision making process. ... Show
Furthermore, fingerprint evidence was expected by 71 percent for breaking and entering cases, 59
percent for theft, and by 66 percent for cases involving a gun. Lawson (2009) brings to the table that
some critics argue that the CSI Effect is a nonexistent theory due to the absence of supporting data
concluding that there is, in fact, an effect on jurors' decision making as a result of criminal
investigation shows. The little evidence that is available to support the CSI Effect is mostly
anecdotal (Shelton, 2008), which is not as reliable. Unfortunately, there may never be much hard,
scientific evidence to prove its

Influence Of The CSI Effect In Crime Scene Investigations
The CSI Effect
The CSI Effect began to fully take effect as the popularity for crime scene investigation televisions
series became popular. One of the more prominent television series that contributes to the CSI Effect
is CSI however there are several more like Criminal Minds, Bones, or Castle. In 2006 the weekly
ratings taken by Nielsan determined that "five of the top 10 television programs [during one week]
were about scientific evidence in criminal cases. Together, they amassed more than 100 million
viewers" (Shelton, 2008). This fact emphasizes just how popular crime television is but more
important what this fact shows is that more than 100 million people can be affected by the CSI
Effect. "The term 'CSI Effect' has become one that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is also the impact on the general public as a whole. For instance, those watch police
investigation dramas on television is generally their only source of knowledge on how the process
works. "Individuals take information they already have, simplify the complexity of an issue, and
derive a steadfast conclusion" (Stevens, 2010 pp. 6–7). What this means is that common people look
at a problem and make an instant resolution or in other words, make a prediction without knowing
all the evidence or going through the deductive process. Individuals see the repetition in the dramas
leading them to assume what is going to happen. The thoughts of these individuals are the ultimate
building blocks to the CSI Effect. What is has ultimately come down to is that "the public has views
shows that have hypothetically solved real–life cases before the actual cases have gotten to trial, so
some jurors believe they have gained 'insight' from the media's amateur sleuthing" (Ramsland, 2006,
pp.

CSI Effect In Criminal Investigations
Over the last decade, the area of criminal investigation has dealt with the "CSI effect." The CSI
effect is defined as the fabrication of the process in which criminal investigations are carried out in
crime scene investigator television programs. The effect is described as not understanding the
purpose, characteristics, unrealistic expectations, and the processes of an investigator. Popular
programs like the CSI series have altered the public's perception of the criminal investigative
process and the role of the crime scene investigation.
Countless judges, attorneys, and journalists have claimed that watching criminal investigative
programs have caused jurors to set free guilty defendants when no scientific evidence has been
obtained. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In a case study on the National Institute of Justice, "Scientific evidence of some kind is expected in
every case by 46% of the jurors, in murder cases by 74%, in assault cases by 43%, in rape cases by
73%, in breaking and entering cases by 49%, in theft cases by 38%, and in crimes involving a gun
by 55%. Fingerprint evidence is expected in every case by 36% of the jurors, in murder cases by
61%, in assault cases by 35%, in rape cases by 41%, in breaking and entering cases by 71%, in theft
cases by 59%, and in crimes involving a gun by 66%. Ballistics evidence is expected in every case
by 32% of the jurors, in murder cases by 62%, in assault cases by 23%, in rape cases by 18%, in
breaking and entering cases by 17%, in theft cases by 16%, and in crimes involving a gun by 77%.
DNA evidence is expected in every case by 22% of the jurors, in murder cases by 46%, in assault
cases by 28%, in rape cases by 73%, in breaking and entering cases by 18%, in theft cases by 12%,
and in crimes involving a gun by 17%." (Donald E. Shelton 2008) I agree that this is a legitimate
phenomenon because CSI shows are for entertainment and aren't obligated to be completely honest
in portraying the investigative

Presentation At The 2010 Cooley Law School Symposium On...
This article originated from the author 's presentation at the 2010 Cooley Law School Symposium
on the "CSI Effect." It reviews the results of two empirical studies of Michigan jurors in various
jurisdictions, which previously concluded that the "prosecutor version" of the so–called CSI effect
cannot be substantiated empirically. The article then describes merged data from the two studies and
the analysis of that merged data. The data supports the earlier suggestion of a "tech effect" based on
cultural changes, rather than any direct impact on certain television programs or genres. It is
suggested that while the prosecutor version of the CSI effect is a myth, there are increased juror
expectations that arise from the combination of the tech effect, the general media portrayal of
forensic evidence, and the misperception of attorneys and judges that the CSI effect does exist.
Possible justice system responses to that combined effect are described, and it is suggested that the
legal system must adapt itself to modern juror expectations rather than blaming jurors for
"unreasonable" expectations and demands for forensic science evidence. 'Blaming CSI Is Too
Simplistic '
Donald Shelton, the chief judge of Washtenaw County, Mich., is skeptical. He began to notice that
reports about the CSI Effect were long on anecdote, and short on data. "One of the things that
surprised me when I started looking into the CSI Effect was that there was no empirical research.
Even the so–called

Forensic in Pop Culture: The CSI Effect Essay
Introduction. With producing reality shows comes producing inaccuracies in portrayals in order to
reach as many viewers and gain as high ratings as possible every week with each new episode.
Every day life is boring, yet people tend to be attracted to the relatable shows that portray real life in
eccentric ways – ways that they believe could be imitated by the average person. In many cases,
these shows could remain harmless, as it is entertainment. No matter how crude or erroneous, it is
just television. However, what happens when these sources of amusement actually start being
damaging? Research has shown that crime shows like the ever popular CSI: Crime Scene
Investigation have started becoming significantly detrimental to criminal ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There is even an interactive exhibit known as "CSI: The Experience" in Orlando, Florida where
people can pay to try out their investigative skills in crime scenes and laboratories similar to ones
that real forensic specialists use. If you search through your television guide, you will see at least
three of these shows on at the same time on different channels, many even having all–day marathons
for you to enjoy on Saturday morning. Simon Cole and Rachel Dioso–Villa have analyzed that many
of these fictitious programs attempt to make science "sexy," which may be the reason why we are so
attracted to them. The scientists look stylish at all times; wearing nice suits or dresses out on the
field or in the laboratory, having normal work days, finding everything they need, having all of the
state–of–the–art equipment and staff they need, and more importantly, they get everything done
quickly and effectively. This glamorous, action–packed lifestyle gives a false sense of what the
career itself actually entails, which includes giant lab coats, numerous court sessions, understaffed
laboratories, no gun, and an abundance of paperwork.
CSI: Reality. Not all primetime crime shows are created equal; some bend forensic realities at
different degrees than others depending on sub–genre. According to Hon

Csi Effect Essay
The CSI effect is best defined as, a belief primarily held among law enforcement personnel and
prosecutors that forensic science TV dramas, such as CSI, influence American jurors to expect more
forensic evidence in order to convict defendants of crimes. The CSI effect started appearing in the
legal dictionary as early as 2003, just three years after the start of the show CSI. The original CSI is
estimated to have gathered around 60 million worldwide each week to watch.
In TV dramas involving forensic science, crime scene investigators collect and analyze evidence,
interview suspects, and then usually solve the crime in an hour or so. While police and prosecutors
know that doing it that quickly is unrealistic, they are concerned that the viewers ... Show more
Tom Tyler is quoted in the Yale Law Review as saying, "That while some existing evidence on juror
decision making is consistent with the CSI effect, it is equally plausible that watching CSI has the
opposite impact on jurors and increases their tendency to convict. One of the very few attempts to
research the CSI effect was undertaken by two professors from Michigan University, they surveyed
1000 jurors prior to them participating in their respective trials. The jurors were asked what
evidence they would expect be presented in seven different types of cases. Twenty–two percent
expected to see DNA in every criminal case. Thirty–six percent expected to see fingerprints in every
criminal case. What they found from their experiment was that CSI viewers did have higher
expectations for scientific evidence than non–CSI viewers, the expectations had little, to nothing, on
the bearing of the jurors' tendency to convict the defendant. This finding is seen as good news for
the criminal justice system. Jurors are taking an active part in doing what they are called to court to
do. Also, it shows that if the defendant is guilty that they will be able to do their job because they
want to have enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is

Forensic Misconduct
Forensic Misconduct: Dr. Pamela A. Fish Kirstin L. Daniels Professor Ian Rodway George Mason
University Forensic Misconduct: Pamela A Fish Forensic science is defined as the practice of
utilizing scientific methodologies to clarify judicial inquiries. The field of forensic science contains
a broad range of disciplines and has become a vital aspect of criminal investigations. Some forensic
disciplines are laboratory–based; while others are based on an analyst's interpretation of observable
patterns (Kourtsounis, 2009). According to the Innocence project's website; in greater than fifty
percent of wrongful convictions, the use of invalidated or improper forensic techniques played a role
in cases; which were later ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although he was in jail, five more crimes with the same distinctive patterns occurred. Though
another man name Dennis McGruder had been arrested and charged with those crimes the
prosecution still moved forward with Willis' case (Warden). The only piece of physical evidence in
this case was a scrap of toilet paper; which, contained traces of semen on it. (In 1992, after two
separate jury trials Willis was convicted based on identification of eyewitness identifications, as well
as the rape victims. He was sentenced to one hundred years in prison. The prosecution in this case
failed to disclose to the defense attorneys that they had received a report; which, stated that one of
the rape suspects had type A blood. This was exculpatory evidence as Willis had type B blood. Dr.
Fish's hand written lab notes concluded that the secretor of the semen had type A blood; however in
her official report and later her testimony, she falsely testified that she was unable to complete the
test because the biological sample was too small to test. In 1997, under a new law granting him the
right to seek DNA testing, Willis filed a petition. Prosecutors claimed that the biological evidence
had been lost, but was later found. The DNA sample was tested and found to exclude Willis as the
donor. After eight years of incarceration, another man Dennis McGruder confessed to the crimes
after being linked via DNA. Willis (Fisher, 2014) was released from custody

CSI Effect: The Use Of Forensic Evidence
The CSI effect is "the phenomenon in which jurors hold unrealistic expectations of forensic
evidence and investigation techniques" (The Economist, 2010). This phenomenon stems from the
crime scene television shows. In recent years, crime–fiction television series have become more
popular. These shows include CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, and Law and Order. Similarly,
forensic dramas have gained popularity over the years as well. These shows include, Without a
Trace, Bones, and Cold Case, approximately 100 million people watching these types of show on a
regular basis. Due to the popularity of these shows court officials have become worried about what
types of expectations jury members will have of court and trials (Shelton, 2008). Another ... Show
The CSI effect influence jurors perception on types of evidence, raises the expectation of evidence,
introduces several types of evidence into the investigation and trial, effects criminals' behavior, and
raises the doubt of guilt.
There are benefits that come from the CSI effect, such as viewers of these shows have knowledge of
what to expect in the courtroom as a juror. They are able to focus more on the evidence that is
stronger, and ignore the minor details or evidence that is not necessarily relevant. This allows them
to not be overwhelmed by the trial, and not get lost in the moment. The CSI effect has allowed more
advance types of evidence into the courtroom. This allows a higher probability of ensuring that the
defendant is actually guilty. This allows the jury to feel more secure in making their

Csi Effect Essay
CSI Effect
Abstract
Crime in America is increasing rapidly and many techniques have been created over the years in
order to solve major crimes. Forensics science is one of the many techniques that have been created.
Forensics is the use of science and technology to investigate and establish facts in criminal courts of
law (free–dictionary, n.d). But there is an upcoming issue which involves the exaggerated details of
forensics science. This paper explores the CSI Effect, compares and contrasts criminalistics which
involves the nature of the crime and criminology which is the study of the criminal behavior,
explores how criminalistics and criminology is fictionally portrayed in the media and how the CSI
Effect influences the public ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We are all now victims of the CSI Effect.
The CSI Effect is a phenomenon reported by prosecutors who claim that television shows based on
scientific crime solving have made actual jurors reluctant to vote to convict when forensic evidence
is neither necessary nor available (Nolo, 2011). The criminalistics and criminology aspects are
especially exaggerated; most evidence that is shown is not as clear in real life. Fingerprints of
victims are not as easily marked or proven. DNA evidence which requires certain
equipment/technology in the lab, is usually too expensive, and isn't even something you would see
in most crime labs. Crimes are also not as traceable as they seem on TV. Many crime scenes take up
to week's sometimes even months to get all of the evidence and process it. The CSI Effect is
influencing the public because the more popular those crime shows get the number of student
majors in forensics science has increased rapidly. They are interested in the fast pace quick higher
level learning skills that they portray in the TV only to learn that it is nothing like how it is on TV.
The CSI Effect is also affecting the real world of criminal justice because it creates unreasonable
expectations in the minds of jurors (Hoffmeister, 2011). They want and expect scientific evidence
linking the defendant to the crime

Crime Analysis: The CSI Effect By Richard Willing
Today's television shows have a strong effect on society. Crime scenes are staged, to be more
appealing for television viewers. In "The CSI Effect" (USA Today, August 2004) Richard Willing
suggest CSI shows inaccurate portals of scientific evidence. He believes this sends the wrong
message to viewers making them believe that forensic scientist can't make mistakes. That evidence,
can't be contaminated I have seen firsthand how invested people are into crime shows. After serving
on jury duty the juniors based there decisions solely on the evidence and didn't care about the
testimony of the defendant. I agree with him that people are heavily influenced by crime analysis
shows, However, reality shows like Intervention help change the lives of, addicts, family members,
and viewers. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He or she is unaware they are on Intervention they believe they are being filmed for a documentary
about addiction. Then we get the backstory as to why he or she started a destructive behavior. Most
stories steam from childhood and they use substances as coping mechanisms. After the film crew
films a few scenes of showing what substances or behaviors the addict participates in. Then
production of the show asks he or she to meet at a hotel for what they think is a final interview. The
family of the participants are waiting with an addiction specialist counselor to have an intervention.
An intervention is when family and friends plead with their loved ones to seek treatment for their
addictive behavior the show pays for 90 days of rehabilitation treatment. Some participants refuse to
go others go and relapse at the end of each show we are given a short update on the progress of the
participants. Intervention is a positive reality show as it helps people struggling in their darkest

The CSI Effect: CSI Overestimate The Rate Of Crime
Emaline Wiles
Mrs. Cruse
ENGL 1113, Section 2232
7 Dec 2015
The CSI Effect
When the television show, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, aired on October 6, 2000 it became an
enormous success. Nielsen data shows that viewers tune in by the millions to watch the drama
series, and the franchise gains even more exposure from reruns. The show was a hit in the world of
entertainment, and it even inspired three "spin–offs", CSI: Miami, CSI: NY, and CSI: Cyber. In the
real life crime investigation world, however, it isn't as revered.
The show, as well as others like it, including NCIS, Without A Trace, Criminal Minds, and Bones,
have been accredited with creating many misconceptions in the minds of modern day Americans.
They are said to often portray racial stereotypes that involve a Latino or African American criminal,
while the white man plays victim. Also, it has been proven that those who heavily watch these crime
shows tend to consistently overestimate the rate of crime in the real world. The frontrunner of these
alleged CSI induced misconceptions has been labeled "The CSI Effect". ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Prosecutors claim that shows like CSI are causing jurors to request extensive evidence that doesn't
exist in real life or help prove cases. Legal experts are concerned that fact and fiction may be getting
confused in the minds of the juries. They fear that when jurors are not provided with the CSI quality
testing and technology that they see on TV, murderers may be more likely to be released back into
civilization. Acquitted and free, those murders could potentially continue to kill without ever being
convicted, but is "The CSI Effect" actually

CSI Effect In Court Cases
The CSI Effect is the belief that television crime shows are effecting decisions made in the court
rooms from jurors. Prosecutors and Judges believe that these shows are causing jurors to be out of
touch with reality when it comes to making a decision about a case in the court room. The Jurors are
said to be out of touch with reality because they have a demand for conclusive scientific evidence.
People who experience the CSI Effect tend to think they are experts in the field. Many forensic
professionals have faced the occasional person at a crime scene telling them how to do their jobs the
way they saw it on CSI (The CSI Effect–Crime Museum, n.d.).
The CSI Effect was first described in the media as a phenomenon resulting from viewing forensic ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unfortunately, life does not always imitate art. Evidence proved that in a number of Durnal studies,
that exposure to forensic science television drama series has altered the American legal system in
complex and far–reaching ways. Jurors think they have a thorough understanding of science they
have seen presented on television, when they do not. In a case cited by Durnal, jurors in a murder
trial brought to the judge's attention that a bloody coat introduced as evidence was not tested for
DNA. The defendant admitted being present at the murder scene, so the test would not have thrown
light on the identity of the true culprit. The judge stated that television is to thank for jurors knowing
what DNA tests could do, but not when it was appropriate to use them. Another study revealed 62%
of defense lawyers and 69% of judges agreed that jurors had unrealistic expectations of forensic
evidence. Approximately half of the respondents in each category felt that jury selection was taking
longer than it used to, because they had to be sure that prospective jurors were not judging scientific
evidence by television standards (The CSI Effect,

The Csi Effect On Crime

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Katie Parker

More from Katie Parker (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Csi Effect On Crime