This document outlines the grading rubric for a thematic integration of faith and learning paper assignment in a BUSI 730 course. It evaluates students on several criteria in 3-4 sentence paragraphs, including content synthesis of knowledge, focus/thesis, foundation of knowledge, application of knowledge, organization of ideas/format, writing skill, and research skill. Students can earn up to 200 total points across these categories. The assignment instructions require a paper with several components: an overview of the course significance, discussion of critical questions, integration of course concepts with the Bible and other sources, and a minimum of 10 recent scholarly references.

1. BUSI 730
Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Paper Grading
Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
140 – 0 points
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Synthesis of Knowledge
Focus/Thesis
60 – 0 points
60 to 56 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to
help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and
exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
55 to 52 points
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building
of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of
thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key
focus of assignment.
51 to 1 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended
assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the

2. assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing
linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few
supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of
the assignment
0 points
Foundation of Knowledge
40 – 0 points
40 to 38 points
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter
in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical
examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
37 to 35 points
Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in
assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating
course content in examples given. Details and facts presented
provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of
subject matter knowledge.
34 to 1 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general,
fundamental understanding of the course material. There are
areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts,
but only meets the minimum requirements in this area
0 points

3. Application of Knowledge
(Critical Thinking Skills
40 – 0 points
40 to 38 points
Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking
necessary for graduate-level work. Student provides a strategic
approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical
thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not
immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and
reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the
assignment.
37 to 35 points
Student exhibits a good command of critical-thinking skills in
the presentation of material and supporting statements.
Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of
relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student
provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
34 to 1 points

4. Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the
reader through various linkages and connections presented in
assignment. Student presents a limited perspective on key
concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have
problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.
0 points
Structure
60 – 0 points
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present

5. Organization of Ideas Format
20 – 0 points
20 to 19 points
Student thoroughly understands and excels at explaining all
major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach
to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall
format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished
assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize
research in a logical sequence.
18 to 17 points
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the
assignment. Student demonstrates a good skill level in
formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student
presents an above-average level of preparedness, with few
formatting errors
16 to 1 points
Student applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student
uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies
throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous
pattern of logical sequencing.
0 points
Writing Skill
20 – 0 points
20 to 19 points
Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as

6. well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style.
Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage.
Student excels in the selection and development of a well-
planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and
reflects student’s ability to prepare graduate-level writing for
possible publication in a peer-reviewed (refereed) journal.
18 to 17 points
Student provides an effective display of good writing and
grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select
appropriate word usage and presents an above-average
presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be
well written with no more than 3 errors. Student provides a
good final product that covers the above-minimal requirements.
16 to 1 points
Assignment provides a basic, but borderline, perspective of
student’s research abilities. Student has incorporated less than 3
sources, which does not attempt to cover key elements of
assignment.
0 points
Research Skill
20 – 0 points
20 to 19 points*
Student provides sophisticated synthesis of complex body of
information in the preparation of assignment. Research provided
by student contributes significantly to the development of the
overall thesis. Student incorporates at least 5 quality references
in assignment. Student incorporates a variety of research
resources and methodology in the preparation of assignment.
18 to 17 points*

7. Student achieves an above-average synthesis of research, but
interpretation is narrow in scope and description within
assignment. Assignment contains less than 4 resources, and
presents an average overview of key concepts.
16 to 1 points*
Assignment provides a basic, but borderline, perspective of
student’s research abilities. Student has incorporated less than 3
sources, which does not attempt to cover key elements of
assignment.
0 points
Instructor Comments
Raw Score 200 points
BUSI 730
Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Paper Instructions
Write a thematic integration of faith and learning concept paper
using a well-rounded approach to the concepts found in the
course texts and current scholarly literature. This paper must be
submitted in compliance with the instructions found in the
Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Paper Grading
Rubric.
The paper must contain the following components:
1. A 2–3-page overview that defines the course as an academic
field of study (significance of the course to business).
2. A 2–3-page discussion of the top 5–8 questions you believe
are critical in order to demonstrate that a student who completes
this course can synthesize the key concepts in strategic
allocation of financial resources and make real-world
applications.
3. A 3–4-page discussion that integrates the concepts from the
Keller text along with the Bible and other sources into a

8. cohesive understanding of why strategic allocation of financial
resources is significant for advancing God’s purposes for
business on earth.
4. A minimum of 10 scholarly journal references; each reference
must be less than 10 years old.
Submit your Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Paper
through the provided SafeAssign link by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on
Sunday of Module 3/Week 6.