APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Undergraduate 300-400 Courses
Updated: June 2013
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Focus/Thesis
Content/Subject Knowledge
Critical Thinking Skills
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing Conventions
Total
Focus/Thesis – 20 points
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
______________________________________________________________________________
Content/Subject Knowledge – 20 points
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide a.
APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Undergraduate 300-400 Courses
Updated: June 2012
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Focus/Thesis
Content/Subject Knowledge
Critical Thinking Skills
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing Conventions
Total
Focus/Thesis – 20 points
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
______________________________________________________________________________
Content/Subject Knowledge – 20 points
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provid ...
APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Graduate 500-600 Courses
Updated: June 2012
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing and Research Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student.
APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Undergraduate 300-400 Courses
Updated: June 2017
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Focus/Thesis
Content/Subject Knowledge
Critical Thinking Skills
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing Conventions
Total
Focus/Thesis – 20 points
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
______________________________________________________________________________
Content/Subject Knowledge – 20 points
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide a.
APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Graduate 500-600 Courses
Updated: June 2012
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing and Research Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student.
APUS Assignment Rubric School of Security and Global Stud.docxjewisonantone
APUS Assignment Rubric
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
• Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
• Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
• Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
• Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
• Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria Exemplary
16-20
Synthesis of
Knowledge
Foundation
of
Knowledge
Application
of
Knowledge
Organization
of
Ideas/Format
Writing and
Research
Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for
the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must
look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of
supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the
assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While
student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the
assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to
support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined
and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon
the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures,
and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague
or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive
to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course
material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum
requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above
average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts.
APUS Assignment Rubric School of Security and Global Stud.docxfestockton
APUS Assignment Rubric
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
• Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
• Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
• Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
• Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
• Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria Exemplary
16-20
Synthesis of
Knowledge
Foundation
of
Knowledge
Application
of
Knowledge
Organization
of
Ideas/Format
Writing and
Research
Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for
the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must
look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of
supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the
assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While
student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the
assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to
support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined
and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon
the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures,
and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague
or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive
to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course
material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum
requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above
average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts ...
Graduate 500-600 CoursesFull Rubric for Classroom Publication.docxwhittemorelucilla
Graduate 500-600 Courses
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing and Research Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course conte ...
APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Undergraduate 300-400 Courses
Updated: June 2012
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Focus/Thesis
Content/Subject Knowledge
Critical Thinking Skills
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing Conventions
Total
Focus/Thesis – 20 points
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
______________________________________________________________________________
Content/Subject Knowledge – 20 points
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provid ...
APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Graduate 500-600 Courses
Updated: June 2012
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing and Research Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student.
APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Undergraduate 300-400 Courses
Updated: June 2017
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Focus/Thesis
Content/Subject Knowledge
Critical Thinking Skills
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing Conventions
Total
Focus/Thesis – 20 points
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
______________________________________________________________________________
Content/Subject Knowledge – 20 points
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide a.
APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Graduate 500-600 Courses
Updated: June 2012
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing and Research Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student.
APUS Assignment Rubric School of Security and Global Stud.docxjewisonantone
APUS Assignment Rubric
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
• Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
• Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
• Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
• Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
• Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria Exemplary
16-20
Synthesis of
Knowledge
Foundation
of
Knowledge
Application
of
Knowledge
Organization
of
Ideas/Format
Writing and
Research
Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for
the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must
look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of
supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the
assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While
student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the
assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to
support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined
and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon
the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures,
and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague
or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive
to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course
material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum
requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above
average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts.
APUS Assignment Rubric School of Security and Global Stud.docxfestockton
APUS Assignment Rubric
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
• Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
• Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
• Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
• Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
• Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria Exemplary
16-20
Synthesis of
Knowledge
Foundation
of
Knowledge
Application
of
Knowledge
Organization
of
Ideas/Format
Writing and
Research
Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for
the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must
look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of
supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the
assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While
student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the
assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to
support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined
and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon
the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures,
and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague
or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive
to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course
material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum
requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above
average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts ...
Graduate 500-600 CoursesFull Rubric for Classroom Publication.docxwhittemorelucilla
Graduate 500-600 Courses
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing and Research Skill
Total
Synthesis of Knowledge (Focus/Thesis)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 4]
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
____________________________________________________________________________
Foundation of Knowledge
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective 3]
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course conte ...
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
17 points
Developing
15 points
Beginning
13 points
Criterion Score
Focus/Thesis
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
/ 20
Content/Subject Knowledge
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
/ 20
Critical Thinking Skills
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for 300-400 level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
Student exhibit ...
Close
Print Rubric
HLSS Assignment Rubric 500-600 Level
Activity: Thesis Proposal - Week 3
Course: HLSS699 A002 Summer 2022
Name: Gussie Bellinger
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
17 points
Developing
15 points
Beginning
13 points
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of
the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well-
constructed to help guide
the reader throughout the
assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the
assignment with well-
documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic and
in the building of the thesis.
Student demonstrates an
effective presentation of
thesis, with most support
statements helping to
support the key focus of
assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader may
have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student has
included a few supporting
facts and statements, this
has limited the quality of
the assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic
used for the thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction of
thesis is not evident, and
reader must look deeper to
discover the focus of the
writer. Student’s writing is
weak in the inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to
relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and
concepts in a logical
sequence.
Student exhibits above
average usage of subject
matter in assignment.
Student provides above
average ability in relating
course content in examples
given. Details and facts
presented provide an
adequate presentation of
student’s current level of
subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that
the student has a general,
fundamental understanding
of the course material.
Whereas, there are areas of
some concerning in the
linkages provided between
facts and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains concepts,
but only meets the
minimum requirements in
this area.
Student tries to explain
some concepts, but
overlooks critical details.
Assignment appears vague
or incomplete in various
segments. Student presents
concepts in isolation, and
does not perceive to have a
logical sequencing of ideas.
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for
graduate level work. Learner
provides a strategic
approach in presenting
examples of problem solving
or critical thinking, while
drawing logical conclusions
...
EXEMPLARY LEVEL 4
ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL 3
DEVELOPING LEVEL 2
BEGINNNIG LEVEL 1
TOTAL POINTS
SYNTHESIS OF KNOWLEDGE
(FOCUS/THESIS)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective #4]
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
FOUNDATION OF KNOWLEDGE
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective #3]
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE (CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective #5]
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for graduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-sup ...
APUS Assignment
Rubric
Undergraduate Level
300-400
EXEMPLARY LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING LEVEL
2
BEGINNNIG LEVEL
1
TOTAL POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS
Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well- documented and exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic
and in the building of the
thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader
may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has
limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
20/20
CONTENT/SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment.
Student provides above
average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental
understanding of the
course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details.
Assignment appears
vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation,
and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
20/20
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for 300-
400 level work. Learner provides a strategic
Student exhibits a good command of critical
thinking skills in the presentation of material
and supporting
Student takes a common, conventional approach in
guiding the reader through various linkages and
connections presented in
Student demonstrates beginning understanding
of ke.
BUSI 730Real World Applications Paper Grading RubricCriteria.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
BUSI 730
Real World Applications Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
105 – 0 points
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Synthesis of Knowledge
Focus/Thesis
45 – 0 points
45 to 42 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
41 to 39 points
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
38 to 1 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment
0 points
Foundation of Knowledge
30 – 0 points
30 to 28 points
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
27 to 26 points
Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
25 to 1 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area
0 points
Application of Knowledge
(Critical Thinking Skills
30 – 0 points
30 to 28 points*
Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for graduate-level work. Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment.
27 to 26 points*
Student exhibits a good command of critical-thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
25 to 1 points*
Student takes a common, conventional approach.
10/11/21, 4:49 PM Assignment 1 - Research Proposal - SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021 - APEI
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=140992&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=43179 1/8
SSGS Assignment Rubric 300-400 Level
Course: SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
15 points
Developing
10 points
Beginning
5 points
Criterion Score
Focus/Thesis / 20Student exhibits
a defined and
clear
understanding of
the assignment.
Thesis is clearly
defined and well-
constructed to
help guide the
reader
throughout the
assignment.
Student builds
upon the thesis
of the
assignment with
well-documented
and exceptional
supporting facts,
figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a
good
comprehension
of topic and in
the building of
the thesis.
Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of
thesis, with most
support
statements
helping to
support the key
focus of
assignment.
Student exhibits
a basic
understanding of
the intended
assignment, but
the thesis is not
fully supported
throughout the
assignment.
While thesis
helps to guide
the development
of the
assignment, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between
thoughts. While
student has
included a few
supporting facts
and statements,
this has limited
the quality of the
assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of
the assignment.
Reader is unable
to follow the
logic used for the
thesis and
development of
key themes.
Introduction of
thesis is not
clearly evident,
and reader must
look deeper to
discover the
focus of the
writer. Student’s
writing is weak in
the inclusion of
supporting facts
or statements.
Paragraph
Lato (Recom…
19px …
10/11/21, 4:49 PM Assignment 1 - Research Proposal - SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021 - APEI
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=140992&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=43179 2/8
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
15 points
Developing
10 points
Beginning
5 points
Criterion Score
Content/Subje
ct Knowledge
/ 20
Student
demonstrates
proficient
command of the
subject matter in
the assignment.
Assignment
shows an
impressive level
of depth of
student’s ability
to relate course
content to
practical
examples and
applications.
Student provides
comprehensive
analysis of
details, facts, and
concepts in a
logical sequence.
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in
assignment.
Student provides
above average
ability in relating
course content in
examples given.
Details and facts
presented
provide an
adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter
knowledge.
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a
general,
fundamental
understanding of
the course
material. There
are areas of
some concerning
in the linkages
provided
between facts
and supporting
statements.
Student generally
explains
concepts, but
only meets th ...
10/11/21, 4:49 PM Assignment 1 - Research Proposal - SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021 - APEI
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=140992&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=43179 1/8
SSGS Assignment Rubric 300-400 Level
Course: SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
15 points
Developing
10 points
Beginning
5 points
Criterion Score
Focus/Thesis / 20Student exhibits
a defined and
clear
understanding of
the assignment.
Thesis is clearly
defined and well-
constructed to
help guide the
reader
throughout the
assignment.
Student builds
upon the thesis
of the
assignment with
well-documented
and exceptional
supporting facts,
figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a
good
comprehension
of topic and in
the building of
the thesis.
Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of
thesis, with most
support
statements
helping to
support the key
focus of
assignment.
Student exhibits
a basic
understanding of
the intended
assignment, but
the thesis is not
fully supported
throughout the
assignment.
While thesis
helps to guide
the development
of the
assignment, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between
thoughts. While
student has
included a few
supporting facts
and statements,
this has limited
the quality of the
assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of
the assignment.
Reader is unable
to follow the
logic used for the
thesis and
development of
key themes.
Introduction of
thesis is not
clearly evident,
and reader must
look deeper to
discover the
focus of the
writer. Student’s
writing is weak in
the inclusion of
supporting facts
or statements.
Paragraph
Lato (Recom…
19px …
10/11/21, 4:49 PM Assignment 1 - Research Proposal - SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021 - APEI
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=140992&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=43179 2/8
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
15 points
Developing
10 points
Beginning
5 points
Criterion Score
Content/Subje
ct Knowledge
/ 20
Student
demonstrates
proficient
command of the
subject matter in
the assignment.
Assignment
shows an
impressive level
of depth of
student’s ability
to relate course
content to
practical
examples and
applications.
Student provides
comprehensive
analysis of
details, facts, and
concepts in a
logical sequence.
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in
assignment.
Student provides
above average
ability in relating
course content in
examples given.
Details and facts
presented
provide an
adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter
knowledge.
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a
general,
fundamental
understanding of
the course
material. There
are areas of
some concerning
in the linkages
provided
between facts
and supporting
statements.
Student generally
explains
concepts, but
only meets th ...
Note for Case Study #1 The case study can be found in the Assignm.docxhenrymartin15260
Note for Case Study #1: The case study can be found in the Assignment folder Case Study 1 Pacific Healthcare. Read and study the case and complete the questions at the end of the study. Use the construct found in the resources folder Case Study Format and Guidance to assist you with your analysis and submit it as part of the assignment. Questions should be answered using case study format. Ensure that you adequately explain the problem, describe alternative solutions and justify your recommendation. This exercise should be able to be completed in approximately 3-6 doubled space pages. Attached completed Case Study #1 as a MS Word document in the assignment area of the classroom – Case Study #1.....................
Assignment Instructions
The case study link is provided below for the Case Study 1 Pacific Healthcare. Read and study the case and complete the questions at the end of the study. Use the case study outline below to assist you with your analysis. Questions should be answered using case study format. Ensure that you adequately explain the problem, describe alternative solutions and justify your recommendation. This exercise should be able to be completed in approximately 3-6 doubled space pages. Attached completed Case Study #1 as a MS Word document in the assignment area of the classroom – Case Study #1.
Please see enclosed attachments:
· Outline for Case Study Paper
· Case Study
· Rubic
APUS Assignment
Rubric
Undergraduate Level
300-400
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
1
TOTAL
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of
the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well
constructed to help guide
the reader throughout the
assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the
assignment with well-
documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic
and in the building of the
thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective
presentation of thesis, with
most support statements
helping to support the key
focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader
may have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student
has included a few
supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of the
assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic
used for the thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction of
thesis is not clearly
evident, and reader must
look deeper to discover
the focus of the writer.
Student’s writing is weak
in the inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
CONTENT/SUBJECT
KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subjec.
Close
Print Rubric
HLSS Assignment Rubric 500-600 Level
Activity: Thesis Proposal - Week 3
Course: HLSS699 A002 Summer 2022
Name: Gussie Bellinger
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
17 points
Developing
15 points
Beginning
13 points
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of
the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well-
constructed to help guide
the reader throughout the
assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the
assignment with well-
documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic and
in the building of the thesis.
Student demonstrates an
effective presentation of
thesis, with most support
statements helping to
support the key focus of
assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader may
have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student has
included a few supporting
facts and statements, this
has limited the quality of
the assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic
used for the thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction of
thesis is not evident, and
reader must look deeper to
discover the focus of the
writer. Student’s writing is
weak in the inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to
relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and
concepts in a logical
sequence.
Student exhibits above
average usage of subject
matter in assignment.
Student provides above
average ability in relating
course content in examples
given. Details and facts
presented provide an
adequate presentation of
student’s current level of
subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that
the student has a general,
fundamental understanding
of the course material.
Whereas, there are areas of
some concerning in the
linkages provided between
facts and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains concepts,
but only meets the
minimum requirements in
this area.
Student tries to explain
some concepts, but
overlooks critical details.
Assignment appears vague
or incomplete in various
segments. Student presents
concepts in isolation, and
does not perceive to have a
logical sequencing of ideas.
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for
graduate level work. Learner
provides a strategic
approach in presenting
examples of problem solving
or critical thinking, while
drawing logical conclusions
...
BUSI 730Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Paper Gradingjenkinsmandie
BUSI 730
Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
140 – 0 points
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Synthesis of Knowledge
Focus/Thesis
60 – 0 points
60 to 56 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
55 to 52 points
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
51 to 1 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment
0 points
Foundation of Knowledge
40 – 0 points
40 to 38 points
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
37 to 35 points
Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
34 to 1 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area
0 points
Application of Knowledge
(Critical Thinking Skills
40 – 0 points
40 to 38 points
Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for graduate-level work. Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment.
37 to 35 points
Student exhibits a good command of critical-thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
34 to 1 points
Student takes a common, ...
APUS Assignment
Rubric
Undergraduate Level
300-400
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
1
TOTAL
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of
the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well
constructed to help guide
the reader throughout the
assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the
assignment with well-
documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic
and in the building of the
thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective
presentation of thesis, with
most support statements
helping to support the key
focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader
may have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student
has included a few
supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of the
assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic
used for the thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction of
thesis is not clearly
evident, and reader must
look deeper to discover
the focus of the writer.
Student’s writing is weak
in the inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
CONTENT/SUBJECT
KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level
of depth of student’s ability
to relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts,
and concepts in a logical
sequence.
Student exhibits above
average usage of subject
matter in assignment.
Student provides above
average ability in relating
course content in
examples given. Details
and facts presented
provide an adequate
presentation of student’s
current level of subject
matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals
that the student has a
general, fundamental
understanding of the
course material. Whereas,
there are areas of some
concerning in the linkages
provided between facts
and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only meets
the minimum requirements
in this area.
Student tries to explain
some concepts, but
overlooks critical details.
Assignment appears
vague or incomplete in
various segments.
Student presents
concepts in isolation,
and does not perceive to
have a logical
sequencing of ideas.
CRITICAL THINKING
SKILLS
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for 300-
400 level work. Learner
provides a strategic
Student exhibits a good
command of critical
thinking skills in the
presentation of material
and supporting
Student takes a common,
conven.
Paper
Graduate Level Rubric:
APUS Assignment Graduate Level Rubric
500-600
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
TOTAL POINTS
FOCUS AND THESIS
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
10 points
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
7 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
5 points
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
1 point
/10
CONTENT AND SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
25 points
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
20 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
15 points
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
10 points
/25
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for 500-600 level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, D.C. 20528 .docxouldparis
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528
(Student Name)
(Private Sector Entity)
Anytown, USA 12345
Dear Mr./Ms.(Student Name):
My name is Randy Ready and I serve as your point of contact for the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). As a component of our nation's critical infrastructure, your
company's operations are vital and essential, not only to your community, but to our country’s
homeland security efforts as a whole. Therefore, it is imperative that your organization take
certain steps and measures that will ensure your essential services will continue in the midst of
a critical incident. To that end, I am requesting a report be forwarded to me as soon as possible
that provides the following information:
Summary concerning your organization and what you feel your roles/responsibilities are
related to overall homeland security efforts.
The steps your organization has taken, whether internally or externally, to ensure these
expectations are fulfilled.
Conversely, provide information concerning challenges your organization faces that
serve as an impediment in meeting your homeland security commitments.
Lastly, what do you expect from DHS in this collaborative effort and how can we as a
Federal agency enhance our level of support?
I look forward to receiving your report, as it will serve as a vital component of our future planning
efforts. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time.
Randy Ready
Regional Liaison,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
SSGS Written Assignment Grading Rubric 300-400 Level
EXEMPLARY LEVEL
16-20
ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL
11-15
DEVELOPING LEVEL
6-10
BEGINNING LEVEL
0-5
TOTAL POINTS 100
Focus/Thesis
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts ...
BUSI 642Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning RubricCri.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
BUSI 642
Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Rubric
Criteria
Content
Levels of Achievement
98 Points
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Key Components
& Major Point Support
98-92 points
· Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements
· Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
· Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for doctoral-level work. Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions, which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or worldviews in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
91-85 points
· Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
· Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
· Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the students above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with two or fewer errors.
84-1 points
· Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
· The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
· Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. Student presents a limited perspective on key.
Assignment Instructions
Instructions:
In 2-3 pages (not counting cover and references), compare and contrast the European and North American freight transportation systems, globalized trade, and global policy implications . Lastly, reviewing the future research, what part do you find interesting and why?
Submission Instructions:
Please attach the assignment in Word Format. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Provide a minimum of 3 in text citations with an APA Reference List.
Grading Rubic:
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNING
LEVEL
1
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS
Student exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Work is clearly defined to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the formatting and grammar is not supported throughout the assignment. The reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. Student has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Assignment instructions were not followed. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Paper includes more than 25% quotes, which renders it unoriginal.
4
SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
4
CRITICAL THINKING
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for undergraduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in p ...
CJUS 310Research Paper – Outline InstructionsYou must provide .docxclarebernice
CJUS 310
Research Paper – Outline Instructions
You must provide an in-depth outline of the research paper you plan to write based on the topic you selected in Module/Week 2. Your outline must contain headings that correlate to your chosen topic:
Introduction
First Heading
Sub-heading
Second Heading
Sub-heading
Third Heading
Sub-heading
Conclusion
Reference List
You must describe each point with 1–2 sentences. See the Research Paper – Final Draft Instructions for details on each section of the paper.
See the Research Paper – Outline Grading Rubric for all grading criteria. You will receive written explanation if your outline needs to be modified.
This assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 4.
CJUS 310
Research Paper – Final Instructions
Now that you have selected a topic, created an outline, and completed a rough draft, you will submit the final copy of your Research Paper. Below you will find detailed instructions for what needs to be included in each section of your paper as well as the details on the formatting.
Research Paper Guidelines
· Length of Paper: A minimum of 5 pages, excluding the title page, abstract, table of contents, reference list, and appendices.
· References: A minimum of 5 primary references and 5 biblical references. All references must be cited in the body of the paper and included in the reference list. Biblical references are only cited in text.
· Formatting: The paper must use 12-point, Times New Roman font and be double-spaced with 1-inch margins. The paper must follow current APA format.
Content
· Title Page: The title must be short and to the point. If the title is more than one line, double-space between the lines. The page header and page number appear at the top right of the title page. The title of the paper is centered on the page. Your name appears 1 double-space below the title. Your institutional affiliation appears 1 double-space below your name, then the course number and title 1 double-space below that. The running head must be in the upper right-hand corner.
· Abstract: A synopsis or executive summary of your project that also describes the purpose of the project and what it accomplishes.
· Introduction: A statement of your approach and assumptions, the background the reader needs to understand your approach, and an explanation of how you intend to address the main issues.
· First Heading: Presents an overview of the history and/or current learning related to the topic, based on literature and electronic sources. It provides the reader with an in-depth understanding regarding the topic.
· Second Heading: Provides the reader with an in-depth understanding of the topic and how the topic is applied in practical settings.
· Third Heading: Integrates the information about the topic and makes assumptions about the current and future use of juvenile justice. The presentation must provide the reader with sufficient information to understand and support the assumptions.
· Conclusi ...
Assignment InstructionsInstructionsThe research paperwiddowsonerica
Assignment Instructions
Instructions:
The research paper should be based on a topic discussed in the course. The requirements of this paper include a cover sheet (using the 6 line undergraduate entry), 3-5 numbered pages of text, and a reference page. The research paper requires at least five references.
PLEASE NOTE: The topic chosen for this research paper cannot be a topic discussed within the weekly assignments for this course. The re-use of any assignment is unacceptable.
Submission Instructions:
Please attach the assignment in Word Format. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Provide a minimum of 3 in text citations with an APA Reference List.
grading cubic:
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNING
LEVEL
1
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS
Student exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Work is clearly defined to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the formatting and grammar is not supported throughout the assignment. The reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. Student has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Assignment instructions were not followed. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Paper includes more than 25% quotes, which renders it unoriginal.
4
SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical seque ...
1 of 2 Fall 2010 Management Program PowerPoint P.docxjeremylockett77
1 of 2
Fall 2010
Management Program
PowerPoint Presentation Rubric
Presenter (s) ___________________________________
Preparation
76-100 51-75 26-50 0-25 Grading Scheme
Percentage
Organization
(20%)
Student presents
information in logical,
interesting sequence
which audience can
follow.
Student presents
information in logical
sequence which
audience can follow.
Audience has difficulty
following presentation
because student jumps
around.
Audience cannot
understand presentation
because there is no
sequence of information.
Content
(20%)
Content reflects a high
level of critical thinking;
data is accurate and
strongly supports the
analysis/conclusion.
Content was obtained
from a variety of relevant
resources and was
properly cited. All issues
are fully addressed.
Presentation contained
excellent examples which
were linked to objective.
Content is well thought
out, data is relevant
and supports
conclusions; reflects
critical thinking and
several relevant
sources of data are
used and are properly
cited. All issues are
included in the
presentation and good
examples were linked
to objective.
Content reflects minimal
depth with little
application of critical
thinking; minimal relevant
data sources are used
and minimal citations are
used. Some issues are
omitted and there were
few relevant examples or
the examples were not
well explained.
Content provides no
apparent application of
critical thinking; has weak
or erroneous facts or
misinterpretation; data
does not support
conclusions. Several
issues are omitted. Few
relevant data sources
used and there was poor
citation. There were no or
too few examples or
examples were difficult to
grasp or did not apply
directly to the objective.
Grammar/
Mechanics
(20%)
Presentation has no
misspellings or
grammatical errors.
Presentation has no
more than two
misspellings and/or
grammatical errors.
Presentation has three
misspellings and/or
grammatical errors.
Presentation has four or
more spelling errors and
or grammatical errors.
2 of 2
Fall 2010
Delivery (20%)
9-10 7-8 5-6 0-4 Grading Scheme
Percentage
Use of PowerPoint
(20%)
PowerPoint presentation
is professional and
enhances the
presentation.
PowerPoint
presentation is
professional based on
the grade level.
PowerPoint presentation
does not meet
expectations.
Poor quality of the
PowerPoint presentation
distracts from the
presentation.
Response to Peers
(20%)
Provided feedback to
more than 2 of your
peers’ powerpoint
presentation.
Provided feedback to
2 of your peers’
powerpoint
presentation.
Provided feedback to 1 of
your peers’ powerpoint
presentations.
Did not provide any
feedback to any peers’
powerpoint presentations.
Total Points:
Management ProgramPowerPoint Presentation RubricPresenter (s) ___________________________________
Graduate Writing ...
BUSI 750Strategic HRD Research Proposal Grading RubricStudent.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
BUSI 750
Strategic HRD Research Proposal Grading Rubric
Student:
A to A-
B+ to B-
Failing
Synthesis of Knowledge
(Focus/Thesis)
30%
110–117
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
103–109
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
0–108
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Foundation of Knowledge
20%
74–78
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
69–73
Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
0–68
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
A to A-
B+ to B-
Failing
Application of Knowledge (Critical Thinking Skills)
20%
74–78
Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for graduate-level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions that are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or worldviews in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
69–73
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
0–68
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student pr.
Choose one monumental policy or regulation and give an in-depth eval.docxnancy1113
Choose one monumental policy or regulation and give an in-depth evaluation the regulation is about, your vision of the regulation, and the reason you chose the regulation i
n 2-3 pages
.
Please use attached Policy as reference for this essay and format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNING
LEVEL
1
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS
Student exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Work is clearly defined to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the formatting and grammar is not supported throughout the assignment. The reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. Student has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Assignment instructions were not followed. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Paper includes more than 25% quotes, which renders it unoriginal.
4
SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
4
CRITICAL THINKING
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for undergraduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment.
You will submit a 1-2 page double spaced paper, plus references, des.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will submit a 1-2 page double spaced paper, plus references, describing this organism, and present it to your peers in class on 6/30. In this paper and presentation, you will lay out the organism’s cellular morphology, metabolic activities, growth niche and any virulence or special attributes that it contains. You may discuss how these factors all contribute to its perpetuation.
.
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary -Reasons for the .docxjustine1simpson78276
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary
-Reasons for the way things are.
-Confussion about the story of reality
-What is christianity
-4 elements of every world view: where we come from? what is our problem? what is the solution?
Restoration
.
More Related Content
Similar to APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level Undergraduate 300-400 Courses.docx
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
17 points
Developing
15 points
Beginning
13 points
Criterion Score
Focus/Thesis
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
/ 20
Content/Subject Knowledge
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
/ 20
Critical Thinking Skills
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for 300-400 level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
Student exhibit ...
Close
Print Rubric
HLSS Assignment Rubric 500-600 Level
Activity: Thesis Proposal - Week 3
Course: HLSS699 A002 Summer 2022
Name: Gussie Bellinger
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
17 points
Developing
15 points
Beginning
13 points
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of
the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well-
constructed to help guide
the reader throughout the
assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the
assignment with well-
documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic and
in the building of the thesis.
Student demonstrates an
effective presentation of
thesis, with most support
statements helping to
support the key focus of
assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader may
have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student has
included a few supporting
facts and statements, this
has limited the quality of
the assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic
used for the thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction of
thesis is not evident, and
reader must look deeper to
discover the focus of the
writer. Student’s writing is
weak in the inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to
relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and
concepts in a logical
sequence.
Student exhibits above
average usage of subject
matter in assignment.
Student provides above
average ability in relating
course content in examples
given. Details and facts
presented provide an
adequate presentation of
student’s current level of
subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that
the student has a general,
fundamental understanding
of the course material.
Whereas, there are areas of
some concerning in the
linkages provided between
facts and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains concepts,
but only meets the
minimum requirements in
this area.
Student tries to explain
some concepts, but
overlooks critical details.
Assignment appears vague
or incomplete in various
segments. Student presents
concepts in isolation, and
does not perceive to have a
logical sequencing of ideas.
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for
graduate level work. Learner
provides a strategic
approach in presenting
examples of problem solving
or critical thinking, while
drawing logical conclusions
...
EXEMPLARY LEVEL 4
ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL 3
DEVELOPING LEVEL 2
BEGINNNIG LEVEL 1
TOTAL POINTS
SYNTHESIS OF KNOWLEDGE
(FOCUS/THESIS)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective #4]
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
FOUNDATION OF KNOWLEDGE
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective #3]
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE (CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS)
[Graduate Learning Outcomes Assessment Objective #5]
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for graduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-sup ...
APUS Assignment
Rubric
Undergraduate Level
300-400
EXEMPLARY LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING LEVEL
2
BEGINNNIG LEVEL
1
TOTAL POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS
Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well- documented and exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic
and in the building of the
thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader
may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has
limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
20/20
CONTENT/SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment.
Student provides above
average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental
understanding of the
course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details.
Assignment appears
vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation,
and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
20/20
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for 300-
400 level work. Learner provides a strategic
Student exhibits a good command of critical
thinking skills in the presentation of material
and supporting
Student takes a common, conventional approach in
guiding the reader through various linkages and
connections presented in
Student demonstrates beginning understanding
of ke.
BUSI 730Real World Applications Paper Grading RubricCriteria.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
BUSI 730
Real World Applications Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
105 – 0 points
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Synthesis of Knowledge
Focus/Thesis
45 – 0 points
45 to 42 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
41 to 39 points
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
38 to 1 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment
0 points
Foundation of Knowledge
30 – 0 points
30 to 28 points
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
27 to 26 points
Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
25 to 1 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area
0 points
Application of Knowledge
(Critical Thinking Skills
30 – 0 points
30 to 28 points*
Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for graduate-level work. Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment.
27 to 26 points*
Student exhibits a good command of critical-thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
25 to 1 points*
Student takes a common, conventional approach.
10/11/21, 4:49 PM Assignment 1 - Research Proposal - SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021 - APEI
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=140992&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=43179 1/8
SSGS Assignment Rubric 300-400 Level
Course: SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
15 points
Developing
10 points
Beginning
5 points
Criterion Score
Focus/Thesis / 20Student exhibits
a defined and
clear
understanding of
the assignment.
Thesis is clearly
defined and well-
constructed to
help guide the
reader
throughout the
assignment.
Student builds
upon the thesis
of the
assignment with
well-documented
and exceptional
supporting facts,
figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a
good
comprehension
of topic and in
the building of
the thesis.
Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of
thesis, with most
support
statements
helping to
support the key
focus of
assignment.
Student exhibits
a basic
understanding of
the intended
assignment, but
the thesis is not
fully supported
throughout the
assignment.
While thesis
helps to guide
the development
of the
assignment, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between
thoughts. While
student has
included a few
supporting facts
and statements,
this has limited
the quality of the
assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of
the assignment.
Reader is unable
to follow the
logic used for the
thesis and
development of
key themes.
Introduction of
thesis is not
clearly evident,
and reader must
look deeper to
discover the
focus of the
writer. Student’s
writing is weak in
the inclusion of
supporting facts
or statements.
Paragraph
Lato (Recom…
19px …
10/11/21, 4:49 PM Assignment 1 - Research Proposal - SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021 - APEI
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=140992&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=43179 2/8
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
15 points
Developing
10 points
Beginning
5 points
Criterion Score
Content/Subje
ct Knowledge
/ 20
Student
demonstrates
proficient
command of the
subject matter in
the assignment.
Assignment
shows an
impressive level
of depth of
student’s ability
to relate course
content to
practical
examples and
applications.
Student provides
comprehensive
analysis of
details, facts, and
concepts in a
logical sequence.
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in
assignment.
Student provides
above average
ability in relating
course content in
examples given.
Details and facts
presented
provide an
adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter
knowledge.
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a
general,
fundamental
understanding of
the course
material. There
are areas of
some concerning
in the linkages
provided
between facts
and supporting
statements.
Student generally
explains
concepts, but
only meets th ...
10/11/21, 4:49 PM Assignment 1 - Research Proposal - SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021 - APEI
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=140992&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=43179 1/8
SSGS Assignment Rubric 300-400 Level
Course: SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
15 points
Developing
10 points
Beginning
5 points
Criterion Score
Focus/Thesis / 20Student exhibits
a defined and
clear
understanding of
the assignment.
Thesis is clearly
defined and well-
constructed to
help guide the
reader
throughout the
assignment.
Student builds
upon the thesis
of the
assignment with
well-documented
and exceptional
supporting facts,
figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a
good
comprehension
of topic and in
the building of
the thesis.
Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of
thesis, with most
support
statements
helping to
support the key
focus of
assignment.
Student exhibits
a basic
understanding of
the intended
assignment, but
the thesis is not
fully supported
throughout the
assignment.
While thesis
helps to guide
the development
of the
assignment, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between
thoughts. While
student has
included a few
supporting facts
and statements,
this has limited
the quality of the
assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of
the assignment.
Reader is unable
to follow the
logic used for the
thesis and
development of
key themes.
Introduction of
thesis is not
clearly evident,
and reader must
look deeper to
discover the
focus of the
writer. Student’s
writing is weak in
the inclusion of
supporting facts
or statements.
Paragraph
Lato (Recom…
19px …
10/11/21, 4:49 PM Assignment 1 - Research Proposal - SCMT498 B001 Fall 2021 - APEI
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=140992&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=43179 2/8
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
15 points
Developing
10 points
Beginning
5 points
Criterion Score
Content/Subje
ct Knowledge
/ 20
Student
demonstrates
proficient
command of the
subject matter in
the assignment.
Assignment
shows an
impressive level
of depth of
student’s ability
to relate course
content to
practical
examples and
applications.
Student provides
comprehensive
analysis of
details, facts, and
concepts in a
logical sequence.
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in
assignment.
Student provides
above average
ability in relating
course content in
examples given.
Details and facts
presented
provide an
adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter
knowledge.
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a
general,
fundamental
understanding of
the course
material. There
are areas of
some concerning
in the linkages
provided
between facts
and supporting
statements.
Student generally
explains
concepts, but
only meets th ...
Note for Case Study #1 The case study can be found in the Assignm.docxhenrymartin15260
Note for Case Study #1: The case study can be found in the Assignment folder Case Study 1 Pacific Healthcare. Read and study the case and complete the questions at the end of the study. Use the construct found in the resources folder Case Study Format and Guidance to assist you with your analysis and submit it as part of the assignment. Questions should be answered using case study format. Ensure that you adequately explain the problem, describe alternative solutions and justify your recommendation. This exercise should be able to be completed in approximately 3-6 doubled space pages. Attached completed Case Study #1 as a MS Word document in the assignment area of the classroom – Case Study #1.....................
Assignment Instructions
The case study link is provided below for the Case Study 1 Pacific Healthcare. Read and study the case and complete the questions at the end of the study. Use the case study outline below to assist you with your analysis. Questions should be answered using case study format. Ensure that you adequately explain the problem, describe alternative solutions and justify your recommendation. This exercise should be able to be completed in approximately 3-6 doubled space pages. Attached completed Case Study #1 as a MS Word document in the assignment area of the classroom – Case Study #1.
Please see enclosed attachments:
· Outline for Case Study Paper
· Case Study
· Rubic
APUS Assignment
Rubric
Undergraduate Level
300-400
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
1
TOTAL
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of
the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well
constructed to help guide
the reader throughout the
assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the
assignment with well-
documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic
and in the building of the
thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective
presentation of thesis, with
most support statements
helping to support the key
focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader
may have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student
has included a few
supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of the
assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic
used for the thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction of
thesis is not clearly
evident, and reader must
look deeper to discover
the focus of the writer.
Student’s writing is weak
in the inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
CONTENT/SUBJECT
KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subjec.
Close
Print Rubric
HLSS Assignment Rubric 500-600 Level
Activity: Thesis Proposal - Week 3
Course: HLSS699 A002 Summer 2022
Name: Gussie Bellinger
Criteria
Exemplary
20 points
Accomplished
17 points
Developing
15 points
Beginning
13 points
Synthesis of Knowledge
Foundation of Knowledge
Application of Knowledge
Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of
the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well-
constructed to help guide
the reader throughout the
assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the
assignment with well-
documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic and
in the building of the thesis.
Student demonstrates an
effective presentation of
thesis, with most support
statements helping to
support the key focus of
assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader may
have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student has
included a few supporting
facts and statements, this
has limited the quality of
the assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic
used for the thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction of
thesis is not evident, and
reader must look deeper to
discover the focus of the
writer. Student’s writing is
weak in the inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to
relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and
concepts in a logical
sequence.
Student exhibits above
average usage of subject
matter in assignment.
Student provides above
average ability in relating
course content in examples
given. Details and facts
presented provide an
adequate presentation of
student’s current level of
subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that
the student has a general,
fundamental understanding
of the course material.
Whereas, there are areas of
some concerning in the
linkages provided between
facts and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains concepts,
but only meets the
minimum requirements in
this area.
Student tries to explain
some concepts, but
overlooks critical details.
Assignment appears vague
or incomplete in various
segments. Student presents
concepts in isolation, and
does not perceive to have a
logical sequencing of ideas.
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for
graduate level work. Learner
provides a strategic
approach in presenting
examples of problem solving
or critical thinking, while
drawing logical conclusions
...
BUSI 730Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Paper Gradingjenkinsmandie
BUSI 730
Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
140 – 0 points
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Synthesis of Knowledge
Focus/Thesis
60 – 0 points
60 to 56 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
55 to 52 points
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
51 to 1 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment
0 points
Foundation of Knowledge
40 – 0 points
40 to 38 points
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
37 to 35 points
Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
34 to 1 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area
0 points
Application of Knowledge
(Critical Thinking Skills
40 – 0 points
40 to 38 points
Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for graduate-level work. Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment.
37 to 35 points
Student exhibits a good command of critical-thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
34 to 1 points
Student takes a common, ...
APUS Assignment
Rubric
Undergraduate Level
300-400
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
1
TOTAL
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS Student exhibits a defined
and clear understanding of
the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well
constructed to help guide
the reader throughout the
assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the
assignment with well-
documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic
and in the building of the
thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective
presentation of thesis, with
most support statements
helping to support the key
focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader
may have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between
thoughts. While student
has included a few
supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of the
assignment.
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic
used for the thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction of
thesis is not clearly
evident, and reader must
look deeper to discover
the focus of the writer.
Student’s writing is weak
in the inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
CONTENT/SUBJECT
KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the
subject matter in the
assignment. Assignment
shows an impressive level
of depth of student’s ability
to relate course content to
practical examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts,
and concepts in a logical
sequence.
Student exhibits above
average usage of subject
matter in assignment.
Student provides above
average ability in relating
course content in
examples given. Details
and facts presented
provide an adequate
presentation of student’s
current level of subject
matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals
that the student has a
general, fundamental
understanding of the
course material. Whereas,
there are areas of some
concerning in the linkages
provided between facts
and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only meets
the minimum requirements
in this area.
Student tries to explain
some concepts, but
overlooks critical details.
Assignment appears
vague or incomplete in
various segments.
Student presents
concepts in isolation,
and does not perceive to
have a logical
sequencing of ideas.
CRITICAL THINKING
SKILLS
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for 300-
400 level work. Learner
provides a strategic
Student exhibits a good
command of critical
thinking skills in the
presentation of material
and supporting
Student takes a common,
conven.
Paper
Graduate Level Rubric:
APUS Assignment Graduate Level Rubric
500-600
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
TOTAL POINTS
FOCUS AND THESIS
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
10 points
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
7 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
5 points
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
1 point
/10
CONTENT AND SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
25 points
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
20 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
15 points
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
10 points
/25
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for 500-600 level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, D.C. 20528 .docxouldparis
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528
(Student Name)
(Private Sector Entity)
Anytown, USA 12345
Dear Mr./Ms.(Student Name):
My name is Randy Ready and I serve as your point of contact for the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). As a component of our nation's critical infrastructure, your
company's operations are vital and essential, not only to your community, but to our country’s
homeland security efforts as a whole. Therefore, it is imperative that your organization take
certain steps and measures that will ensure your essential services will continue in the midst of
a critical incident. To that end, I am requesting a report be forwarded to me as soon as possible
that provides the following information:
Summary concerning your organization and what you feel your roles/responsibilities are
related to overall homeland security efforts.
The steps your organization has taken, whether internally or externally, to ensure these
expectations are fulfilled.
Conversely, provide information concerning challenges your organization faces that
serve as an impediment in meeting your homeland security commitments.
Lastly, what do you expect from DHS in this collaborative effort and how can we as a
Federal agency enhance our level of support?
I look forward to receiving your report, as it will serve as a vital component of our future planning
efforts. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time.
Randy Ready
Regional Liaison,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
SSGS Written Assignment Grading Rubric 300-400 Level
EXEMPLARY LEVEL
16-20
ACCOMPLISHED LEVEL
11-15
DEVELOPING LEVEL
6-10
BEGINNING LEVEL
0-5
TOTAL POINTS 100
Focus/Thesis
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts ...
BUSI 642Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning RubricCri.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
BUSI 642
Thematic Integration of Faith and Learning Rubric
Criteria
Content
Levels of Achievement
98 Points
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Key Components
& Major Point Support
98-92 points
· Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements
· Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
· Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for doctoral-level work. Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions, which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or worldviews in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
91-85 points
· Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
· Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
· Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the students above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with two or fewer errors.
84-1 points
· Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
· The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
· Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. Student presents a limited perspective on key.
Assignment Instructions
Instructions:
In 2-3 pages (not counting cover and references), compare and contrast the European and North American freight transportation systems, globalized trade, and global policy implications . Lastly, reviewing the future research, what part do you find interesting and why?
Submission Instructions:
Please attach the assignment in Word Format. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Provide a minimum of 3 in text citations with an APA Reference List.
Grading Rubic:
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNING
LEVEL
1
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS
Student exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Work is clearly defined to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the formatting and grammar is not supported throughout the assignment. The reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. Student has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Assignment instructions were not followed. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Paper includes more than 25% quotes, which renders it unoriginal.
4
SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
4
CRITICAL THINKING
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for undergraduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in p ...
CJUS 310Research Paper – Outline InstructionsYou must provide .docxclarebernice
CJUS 310
Research Paper – Outline Instructions
You must provide an in-depth outline of the research paper you plan to write based on the topic you selected in Module/Week 2. Your outline must contain headings that correlate to your chosen topic:
Introduction
First Heading
Sub-heading
Second Heading
Sub-heading
Third Heading
Sub-heading
Conclusion
Reference List
You must describe each point with 1–2 sentences. See the Research Paper – Final Draft Instructions for details on each section of the paper.
See the Research Paper – Outline Grading Rubric for all grading criteria. You will receive written explanation if your outline needs to be modified.
This assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 4.
CJUS 310
Research Paper – Final Instructions
Now that you have selected a topic, created an outline, and completed a rough draft, you will submit the final copy of your Research Paper. Below you will find detailed instructions for what needs to be included in each section of your paper as well as the details on the formatting.
Research Paper Guidelines
· Length of Paper: A minimum of 5 pages, excluding the title page, abstract, table of contents, reference list, and appendices.
· References: A minimum of 5 primary references and 5 biblical references. All references must be cited in the body of the paper and included in the reference list. Biblical references are only cited in text.
· Formatting: The paper must use 12-point, Times New Roman font and be double-spaced with 1-inch margins. The paper must follow current APA format.
Content
· Title Page: The title must be short and to the point. If the title is more than one line, double-space between the lines. The page header and page number appear at the top right of the title page. The title of the paper is centered on the page. Your name appears 1 double-space below the title. Your institutional affiliation appears 1 double-space below your name, then the course number and title 1 double-space below that. The running head must be in the upper right-hand corner.
· Abstract: A synopsis or executive summary of your project that also describes the purpose of the project and what it accomplishes.
· Introduction: A statement of your approach and assumptions, the background the reader needs to understand your approach, and an explanation of how you intend to address the main issues.
· First Heading: Presents an overview of the history and/or current learning related to the topic, based on literature and electronic sources. It provides the reader with an in-depth understanding regarding the topic.
· Second Heading: Provides the reader with an in-depth understanding of the topic and how the topic is applied in practical settings.
· Third Heading: Integrates the information about the topic and makes assumptions about the current and future use of juvenile justice. The presentation must provide the reader with sufficient information to understand and support the assumptions.
· Conclusi ...
Assignment InstructionsInstructionsThe research paperwiddowsonerica
Assignment Instructions
Instructions:
The research paper should be based on a topic discussed in the course. The requirements of this paper include a cover sheet (using the 6 line undergraduate entry), 3-5 numbered pages of text, and a reference page. The research paper requires at least five references.
PLEASE NOTE: The topic chosen for this research paper cannot be a topic discussed within the weekly assignments for this course. The re-use of any assignment is unacceptable.
Submission Instructions:
Please attach the assignment in Word Format. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Provide a minimum of 3 in text citations with an APA Reference List.
grading cubic:
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNING
LEVEL
1
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS
Student exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Work is clearly defined to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the formatting and grammar is not supported throughout the assignment. The reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. Student has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Assignment instructions were not followed. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Paper includes more than 25% quotes, which renders it unoriginal.
4
SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical seque ...
1 of 2 Fall 2010 Management Program PowerPoint P.docxjeremylockett77
1 of 2
Fall 2010
Management Program
PowerPoint Presentation Rubric
Presenter (s) ___________________________________
Preparation
76-100 51-75 26-50 0-25 Grading Scheme
Percentage
Organization
(20%)
Student presents
information in logical,
interesting sequence
which audience can
follow.
Student presents
information in logical
sequence which
audience can follow.
Audience has difficulty
following presentation
because student jumps
around.
Audience cannot
understand presentation
because there is no
sequence of information.
Content
(20%)
Content reflects a high
level of critical thinking;
data is accurate and
strongly supports the
analysis/conclusion.
Content was obtained
from a variety of relevant
resources and was
properly cited. All issues
are fully addressed.
Presentation contained
excellent examples which
were linked to objective.
Content is well thought
out, data is relevant
and supports
conclusions; reflects
critical thinking and
several relevant
sources of data are
used and are properly
cited. All issues are
included in the
presentation and good
examples were linked
to objective.
Content reflects minimal
depth with little
application of critical
thinking; minimal relevant
data sources are used
and minimal citations are
used. Some issues are
omitted and there were
few relevant examples or
the examples were not
well explained.
Content provides no
apparent application of
critical thinking; has weak
or erroneous facts or
misinterpretation; data
does not support
conclusions. Several
issues are omitted. Few
relevant data sources
used and there was poor
citation. There were no or
too few examples or
examples were difficult to
grasp or did not apply
directly to the objective.
Grammar/
Mechanics
(20%)
Presentation has no
misspellings or
grammatical errors.
Presentation has no
more than two
misspellings and/or
grammatical errors.
Presentation has three
misspellings and/or
grammatical errors.
Presentation has four or
more spelling errors and
or grammatical errors.
2 of 2
Fall 2010
Delivery (20%)
9-10 7-8 5-6 0-4 Grading Scheme
Percentage
Use of PowerPoint
(20%)
PowerPoint presentation
is professional and
enhances the
presentation.
PowerPoint
presentation is
professional based on
the grade level.
PowerPoint presentation
does not meet
expectations.
Poor quality of the
PowerPoint presentation
distracts from the
presentation.
Response to Peers
(20%)
Provided feedback to
more than 2 of your
peers’ powerpoint
presentation.
Provided feedback to
2 of your peers’
powerpoint
presentation.
Provided feedback to 1 of
your peers’ powerpoint
presentations.
Did not provide any
feedback to any peers’
powerpoint presentations.
Total Points:
Management ProgramPowerPoint Presentation RubricPresenter (s) ___________________________________
Graduate Writing ...
BUSI 750Strategic HRD Research Proposal Grading RubricStudent.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
BUSI 750
Strategic HRD Research Proposal Grading Rubric
Student:
A to A-
B+ to B-
Failing
Synthesis of Knowledge
(Focus/Thesis)
30%
110–117
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
103–109
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
0–108
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Foundation of Knowledge
20%
74–78
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
69–73
Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
0–68
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
A to A-
B+ to B-
Failing
Application of Knowledge (Critical Thinking Skills)
20%
74–78
Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for graduate-level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions that are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or worldviews in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
69–73
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
0–68
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student pr.
Choose one monumental policy or regulation and give an in-depth eval.docxnancy1113
Choose one monumental policy or regulation and give an in-depth evaluation the regulation is about, your vision of the regulation, and the reason you chose the regulation i
n 2-3 pages
.
Please use attached Policy as reference for this essay and format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNING
LEVEL
1
POINTS
FOCUS/THESIS
Student exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Work is clearly defined to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the formatting and grammar is not supported throughout the assignment. The reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. Student has limited the quality of the assignment.
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Assignment instructions were not followed. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Paper includes more than 25% quotes, which renders it unoriginal.
4
SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
4
CRITICAL THINKING
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for undergraduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment.
Similar to APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level Undergraduate 300-400 Courses.docx (20)
You will submit a 1-2 page double spaced paper, plus references, des.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will submit a 1-2 page double spaced paper, plus references, describing this organism, and present it to your peers in class on 6/30. In this paper and presentation, you will lay out the organism’s cellular morphology, metabolic activities, growth niche and any virulence or special attributes that it contains. You may discuss how these factors all contribute to its perpetuation.
.
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary -Reasons for the .docxjustine1simpson78276
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary
-Reasons for the way things are.
-Confussion about the story of reality
-What is christianity
-4 elements of every world view: where we come from? what is our problem? what is the solution?
Restoration
.
You will submit a 1500 word fully-referenced critical essay .docxjustine1simpson78276
You will submit a 1500 word
fully-referenced
critical essay which will DISCUSS ONE of the following:
a) Journalism is an expression of the culture in which it resides.
b) The decline of the foreign correspondent.
c) Does the West continue to dominate global news flow?
d) Asian values in journalism and its impact across the Asia-Pacific region.
e) The challenges for African journalism in the 21st century.
f) Compare and contrast development journalism in Asia and Africa.
g) The Pacific journalist – tradition versus freedom of expression.
h) The challenges for investigative journalism in Eastern Europe.
i) The clash of civilisation and its influence on US journalism.
j) The framing of Africa by western journalists.
k) Freedom of expression vs democracy in Latin America.
l) The decline of US newspapers and what it means for democracy.
m) Is peace journalism possible?
n)
OR a statement you design based on your studies which has received prior approval from your tutor at least TWO weeks before due date
.
Your assignment will be assessed according to the criteria sheet at the end of the Subject Outline. You are encouraged to self-assess your work by submitting a copy of this assessment criteria sheet with your assignment.
Length: 1500 words
Due: Friday of Week 14
.
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary The story of real.docxjustine1simpson78276
you will submit a 150-200 word reading summary
The story of reality
What does it mean whether or not the Christian story is the truth about the world.
The blind men and the Elephant
Two applications: religious and skeptical
Three problems: contraction claims, story teller, a talking elephant.
Christians have a problem with the evil.
The problem of a narrow way.
God, Jesus, Men, Resurrection
.
You will select an enterprise-level risks that impact an organizatio.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will select an enterprise-level risks that impact an organization of your choice … please address the following items:
• Here’s the approach you can take for this paper:
Title page (ensure team members and IDs are listed)
Introduction – provide a background of the selected organization.
Risk #1
Description
Impact on organization
Recommendation on how to manage it
Risk #2
Description
Impact on organization
Recommendation on how to manage it
Risk #3
Description
Impact on organization
Recommendation on how to manage it
Conclusion
References (minimum of 8 reputable sources)
Appendix (if any)
The paper will range from 15-pages includes title page, content, and references.
Please write in APA Style.
.
You will select a psychologist (Skinner or Freud ) and conduct a bri.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will select a psychologist (Skinner or Freud ) and conduct a brief investigation of their work. You will produce a two-page written document with a corresponding reference section (three pages total) summarizing the psychologist’s major contribution(s) to the field of psychology, their influence on modern-day psychology, and your opinion on the significance of their work.
Read the files for more detail.
.
You will select a hot button issue from current or relatively re.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will select a hot button issue from current or relatively recent events and examine the ways it (was) being covered by various media outlets. Once you select your topic you must obtain a representative sample of how the topic is being discussed in major outlets of the Conservative, Liberal, and Non-partisan media as well as how it is being discussed on the media. The website
www.allslides.com
will assist you in determining the political views of various media outlets. The components of your project are listed below:
1. A representative sample of how the topic is being discussed in the Conservative (right wing) media:
a. 1 short video clip from a major conservative cable news outlet (e.g. Fox News)
b. 1 example from a major conservative web site (e.g. The Heritage Fondation)
c. 1 example from a major liberal magazine or newspaper (e.g. The National Review / The New York Post)
2. A representative sample of how the topic is being discussed in the Liberal / Progressive (left wing) media:
a. 1 short video clip from a major liberal cable news outlet (e.g. MSNBC)
b. 1 example from a major liberal web site (e.g. thinkprogress.org)
c. 1 example from a major liberal magazine or newspaper (e.g. Mother Jones / The New York Times)
3. A representative sample of how the topic is being discussed in the Center / Non-partisan / Mainstream media:
a. 1 short video clip from a major mainstream news outlet (e.g. ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN)
b. 1 example from a major mainstream web site (e.g. politico.com)
c. 1 example from a major mainstream magazine or newspaper (e.g. Time / USA Today)
4. A representative sample of how the topic is being discussed in the social media:
a. 1 example of a back and forth discussion from a social media outlet (e.g. Facebook, Twitter)
.
you will research resources available on the Internet for monitoring.docxjustine1simpson78276
you will research resources available on the Internet for monitoring natural phenomena including earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, global climate, and weather.
Based on your research, do the following:
Identify a minimum of three different natural phenomena that are typically responsible for natural disasters. Analyze the potential impact of these disasters.
Analyze how these phenomenon are monitored, or not, via the Internet. Critique available Web sites, which publicly display up-to-date monitored information related to each of the natural phenomena you have identified. Focus on the following aspects:
Geography
What parts of the world are potentially affected by these phenomena? Specifically identify the countries.
Resources
What kinds of resources are allocated toward monitoring these phenomena and why?
What types of Web resources monitor the phenomena and provide up-to-date information about them?
What kinds of technology are involved in monitoring the phenomena?
Politics
What political ramifications would this disaster-preparedness technology cause between more-developed countries and less-developed countries?
What kinds of issues could this technology cause between less-developed countries?
Economics
How would this technology directly impact the economies of those countries that have the technology versus those countries that do not?
Do you predict any indirect impacts? What current evidence supports your position?
Disaster Preparedness
What types of systems are in place in terms of disaster preparedness related to these monitored phenomena?
Summarize your findings. Evaluate how this technology will impact the future of humanity, both positively and negatively. Be sure to consider the political and economic issues discussed in your future predictions.
Support your statements with examples. Use a minimum of six reliable references, two of which should be peer-reviewed articles.
Write a 7–8-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
.
You will review qualitative research. The topic is up to you as lon.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will review qualitative research. The topic is up to you as long as you choose a peer-reviewed, academic research piece. There are no hard word counts or page requirements as long as you cover the basic guidelines. You must submit original work, however, and a paper that returns as a large percentage of copy/paste to other sources will not be accepted. (Safe Assign will be used to track/monitor your submission for plagiarism.)
Please use APA formatting and include the following information:
Introduction/Background: Provide context for the research article. What led the author(s) to write the piece? What key concepts were explored? Were there weaknesses in prior research that led the author to the current hypothesis or research question?
Methodology: Describe how the data was gathered and analyzed. What research questions or hypotheses were the researcher trying to explore? What statistical analysis was used?
Study Findings and Results: What were the major findings from the study? Were there any limitations?
Conclusions: Evaluate the article in terms of significance, research methods, readability and the implications of the results. Does the piece lead into further study? Are there different methods you would have chosen based on what you read? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article in terms of statistical analysis and application? (This is where a large part of the rubric is covered.)
References
.
You will review quantitative research. The topic is up to you as lo.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will review quantitative research. The topic is up to you as long as you choose a peer-reviewed, academic research piece. There are no hard word counts or page requirements as long as you cover the basic guidelines. You must submit original work, however, and a paper that returns as a large percentage of copy/paste to other sources will not be accepted. (Safe Assign will be used to track/monitor your submission for plagiarism.)
Please use APA formatting and include the following information:
Introduction/Background: Provide context for the research article. What led the author(s) to write the piece? What key concepts were explored? Were there weaknesses in prior research that led the author to the current hypothesis or research question?
Methodology: Describe how the data was gathered and analyzed. What research questions or hypotheses were the researcher trying to explore? What statistical analysis was used?
Study Findings and Results: What were the major findings from the study? Were there any limitations?
Conclusions: Evaluate the article in terms of significance, research methods, readability and the implications of the results. Does the piece lead into further study? Are there different methods you would have chosen based on what you read? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article in terms of statistical analysis and application? (This is where a large part of the rubric is covered.)
References
.
You will research one womens movement that we have not discussed in.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will research one women's movement that we have not discussed in class. Include prominent leaders, prominent issues, challenge to the movement, outcomes of the movement and background information such as how the movement originated. This part must be
at least 1 page
in length and have
3 sources
cited related to your chosen movement. Make sure that they are "academic sources." That means, no wikipedia or other unverified sources. I will deduct MAJOR points for missing citations as it constitutes plagiarism! Include your citations after each essay.
.
You will research a Native American or African communitys culture, .docxjustine1simpson78276
You will research a Native American or African community's culture, oral tradition, religious texts, historical background, and current beliefs and practices.
If possible, interview a Native American or African, medicine man, shaman, or museum expert about that community. If you would like to take pictures during your visit to this community, museum, or place of worship be sure to obtain permission.
In a 15-20-slide presentation with slide notes (not including title slide and reference slide), address the following elements:
Name of the Native American community or African Tribal Religion and the historical religious beliefs and practices of that group.
How historical beliefs and religious practices have been influenced (positively or negatively) by the dominant surrounding culture. Include specific examples.
Current religious beliefs and practices and the part they play in the daily life of a typical member of the community.
Elements of the traditional religion that a Christian would need to consider when sharing the Christian faith/gospel with a person from this community.
Evaluation of the impact American or European policy has had on Native American or African Tribal Religion beliefs and practices.
How current and future governmental policies could impact personal beliefs and practices of that community in the future.
Be creative. Include a title slide, reference slide(s), and slide notes that provide detailed explanation of slide information.
Utilize the course textbook and a minimum of three additional academic resources, one of which can be your interview and should include topic materials and external resources.
.
You will receive 15 points extra credit (added to the homework p.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will receive 15 points extra credit (added to the homework portion of your grade) for locating and submitting a summary of a legal news article that was (1) published within the preceding year and (2) that
is relevant to one of the topics that we have previously covered in the course
(e.g., Torts, Contracts, Constitutional Law, Franchising, etc.). You may find appropriate legal news articles at findlaw.com, on the websites of many news organizations (i.e., the Associated Press, Reuters, the Los Angeles Times, NBC News, etc.), or from any other
reputable
online or print sources.
Your summary must:
Discuss facts of the legal news story
Explain how the news story relates to a topic previously discussed in class, and
Either attach a copy of the new story or provide a functioning link to the article online that will allow me to easily find it.
.
You will provide a short analysis of the interaction of group member.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will provide a short analysis of the interaction of group members that you observe in action. For example, You could go to a county courthouse to watch a celebrity's trial, or you could watch Court TV and follow the proceedings there. After you have completed your observation, write a short critique of what you have observed.
Briefly describe what group meeting you observed as well as where and when the meeting took place. [For example, "I observed the Killeen City Council meeting on October 1, 2015 at Killeen City Hall.]
What organizational plan was employed? [For example, Parliamentary Procedure was employed with the reading of the minutes, old business, new business, etc.]
How were the decisions made? [For example, majority rule, consensus, leader-dictated, etc.]
How was information about topics gathered? [For example, research was provided by group members, research was provided by staff or outsiders, or testimony was provided, etc]
Was there a formal designated leader? Did certain members seem to play particular roles and assume specific responsibilities? [For example, the Mayor was the leader of the City Council.]
Were there conflicts or disagreements between group members and/or outsiders and how were they resolved? [For example, some council members wanted to annex property into the city limits, while some other council members as well as the citizens testifying, were opposed. The council decided to discuss the issue in executive session.]
Did the group tend to digress (get off the topic)? Did someone get them back to the subject, and if so, who did so?
Did the group seem thorough and complete in its treatment of the subjects that it addressed?
Were the group members clear in expressing themselves by phrasing their ideas carefully and by presenting their ideas in a vivid manner?
Would you personally feel comfortable addressing this group? Why or why not? Explain.
.
You will produce and submit a Powerpoint of screenshots related to .docxjustine1simpson78276
You will produce and submit a Powerpoint of screenshots related to using a forensics tool. (Example : FTK Imager) The tool may be any software that captures cell phone or wireless network traffic. You will need to capture screen shots for:
Installation and Setup of a forensics tool on your computer (Minimum of 2 screenshots of this process)
Captured data using the forensics tool (Minimum of 4 screenshots of this process)
Reports from the captured data (Minimum of 3 screenshots)
.
You will produce a clear and coherent writing that is well organized.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will produce a clear and coherent writing that is well organized and edited. After reading and watching S.E. Hinton's "The Outsiders" and "Fences" by August Wilson.
In 350 words or more analyze the impact of the social norms of the 1950’s on the development of theme and character in both Fences and The Outsiders. Use at least two pieces of evidence to support your thinking. Make sure to cite correctly using MLA format. 16 points
Use this sentence format below (fill in the blank, but be clear on what you type):
The 1950’s were a turbulent time in American history. The nation was rapidly changing as were American values.[Three events that happened in the 1950’s that shaped American values]. Although this time is often thought of as a period of prosperity not every American benefited during that decade. In fact two texts written much later would utilize those tensions in a subtle way, to explore the ideas of ___Topic #1____ and ____Topic #2__.
Both The Outsiders and Fences deal with the topics of ____ and ____ by showing the development of their characters and build their themes through their actions and interactions.
Although both stories take place in different parts of America and deal with different ethnic groups they resoundingly share the same theme that in order for a family to stay together they must be willing to change and sacrifice
. A moment in __Title of text_____ that demonstrates this is when [Context for your evidence]“[Textual evidence” this [Analysis of text] (Citation). Similarly in ___Title & author____ there is a moment that _[synonym for displays]___ this theme when [Context for textual evidence].“[Textual evidence to support your claim” ]which shows [Analysis of textual evidence] (Citation). In addition this reinforces the social norm of the time that [Social norm shown in textual evidence].
On the other hand there are subtle differences between the texts when it comes to the topic of ___Topic #3___. In _Tiltle of text__ __Topic #3___ [claim about topic #3]. It is made clear to the reader that[claim about the differences between the text].[Contextualize the differences with an example]. [Reasoning for the different view on the topic]. The fierce 50’s are more than a half a century behind us but the themes and culture that emerged during that time can still be seen today.
.
You will present ADP and Paychex as the recommendations to the VP .docxjustine1simpson78276
You will present ADP and Paychex as the recommendations to the VP of the company. The assignment is to explain the following
1.How will they provide Payroll processing with a HR Integration Interface
2.How will they provide an appropriate report generation feature with both custom reporting and standard reporting features
.
You will prepare and present a personality analysis of your choo.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will prepare and present a personality analysis of your choosing. In 10-12 slides, address the following questions.
Choose a person to analyze. This can be a historical figure, a famous person (politician, celebrity, musician), or a fictional character from a book or other media. Just be sure you have enough information on this person’s personality and background to fully analyze them.
Describe this person’s personality in detail using language and concepts from the humanistic perspective.
Analyze this person from both Abraham Maslow’s humanistic perspective and Carl Rogers’s humanistic perspective. In other words, explain how this person’s personality would be described by each of those theorists. Explain how their personality developed the way it did, from Maslow's and Rogers’s perspectives.
If the person you described experiences psychological issues or psychopathology, explain how humanistic theory can be used to restore a state of health and psychological well-being to the person. In other words, if they suffer from anxiety, depression or other disorders, how would humanistic theorists like Maslow and Rogers help them overcome those disorders?
Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include 50-75 words per slide.
.
you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation on the consumer infor.docxjustine1simpson78276
you will prepare a PowerPoint presentation on the consumer informatics pillar of health informatics including the e-patient movement (i.e., the widespread use of the Internet or other technologies that allows patients to have more participation in their medical care) and the Personal Health Record (PHR). Creating this week’s presentation will give you the opportunity to explore how participatory health care informatics is shaping patient-centered models of care.
Create your PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes that critically address each of the following elements. (Remember that your presentation slides should have short, bullet-pointed text with your speaker notes including the bulk of the information provided in the following list.)
Interpret the definition of consumer health informatics from national sources such as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), etc.
Compare and contrast the roles of patient, consumer, caregiver, and professional in consumer informatics.
Analyze health literacy’s role in the success of consumer informatics.
Analyze the role of the e-patient movement and the PHR in effecting health care change.
Examine how participatory health care informatics is shaping patient-centered models of care.
Compare and contrast two examples of consumer informatics applications of your choosing. (Examples could be those found on the Internet or those you’ve encountered in your personal life.)
You may wish to include visual enhancements in your presentation. These may include appropriate images, a consistent font, appropriate animations, and transitions from content piece to content piece and slide to slide.
Must be five to seven slides with speaker notes (not including the title and references slides) and formatted according to APA style
Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Must include a separate references slide that is formatted according to APA style
Due Saturday 11/7/2020
.
You will post a 250-word reply to 2 classmate’s threads. The reply r.docxjustine1simpson78276
You will post a 250-word reply to 2 classmate’s threads. The reply requires a minimum of 1 properly formatted citation. Each reply must be completed by you, the individual student. Additionally, each thread and reply must reflect a solid Christian worldview through the use of at least 1 Holy Bible reference.
EUGENE
In reviewing this week’s reading material, Kouzes and Posner’s (2017) argument for the importance of enabling others to act, fostering collaboration, and strengthening others reminded me of Deci and Ryan’s (1985) self-determination theory. I have routinely come back to this theory throughout my coursework as the principles within it seem to fit many different molds, specifically leadership and motivation. The topic of motivation and police officers has become an area of interest due in part to research showing the unique nature of being a police officer, to include internal and external stressors that are seldom experienced by any other profession (Accquadro Maran, Zedda, Varetto & Ieraci, 2015). Deci and Ryan’s (1985) self-determination theory simply says that in order for humans to feel motivated to perform they must have a sense of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. I find that Kouzes and Posner’s (2017) concept of enabling others to act and fostering collaborations meld perfectly with providing people with a sense of autonomy. Leaders, especially front-line supervisors within law enforcement organizations, have a dramatic impact on the autonomy of officers. I have seen first-hand how front-line leadership can restrict the decision-making process so much that they drain the officer’s motivation which leads to them not wanting to act and foster any sort of collaboration with the organization. Having the confidence as a leader to step back and allow others to make decisions is a worthy investment. While not every situation will allow for this, leaders must learn to create environments in which their people can be successful and allow them to make decisions. This level of confidence is not learned overnight, and I have struggled with this myself. However, once I observed the benefits of allowing officers to make their own decisions, obviously within the guidelines of our policies, they feel more connected and confident in their ability to solve problems. If we look at Deci and Ryan’s (1985) argument for competence, this aligns with Kouzes and Posner’s (2017) argument for strengthening others. Competence, or having the ability to complete the task at hand, comes down to proper training which strengthens others and allows them to complete their job more effectively and with confidence. Failure to strengthen others can, and will, result in stagnation due to a lack of motivation to perform. Leadership is a challenging process that takes time to learn and understand. This process can certainly be daunting, however just as Proverbs 3:5 (English Standard Version, 2020) reads, “Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean .
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
1. APUS Assignment Rubric Lower Level
Undergraduate 300-400 Courses
Updated: June 2013
Full Rubric for Classroom Publication
School of Security and Global Studies Rubric Features
· Rubric categories are evenly distributed – 20 points per
category.
· Assignment settings equal 100 points for each assignment.
· Grade book is set for weighted categories (not points).
· Separate rubrics in 100-200, 300-400, 500-600 level courses
for assignments.
· Standard forum discussion rubric for all levels.
Quick Table for Insertion in Assignments (within Word
document)
Criteria
Exemplary 16-20
Accomplished 11-15
Developing 6-10
Beginning 0-5
Total
Focus/Thesis
Content/Subject Knowledge
2. Critical Thinking Skills
Organization of Ideas/Format
Writing Conventions
Total
Focus/Thesis – 20 points
Beginning
Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is
unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development
of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and
reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer.
Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or
statements.
3. Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended
assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the
assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing
linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few
supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of
the assignment.
Accomplished
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building
of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of
thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key
focus of assignment.
Exemplary
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to
help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and
exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Content/Subject Knowledge – 20 points
Beginning
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical
details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various
segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not
perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general,
fundamental understanding of the course material. There are
areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts,
but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
4. Accomplished
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in
assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating
course content in examples given. Details and facts presented
provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of
subject matter knowledge.
Exemplary
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter
in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical
examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Critical Thinking Skills – 20 points
Beginning
Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts,
but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply
information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents
confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or
little semblance of critical thinking skills.
Developing
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the
reader through various linkages and connections presented in
assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on
key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have
problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.
Accomplished
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in
the presentation of material and supporting statements.
Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of
relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student
5. provides adequate conclusions, with two or fewer errors.
Exemplary
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking
necessary for 300-400 level work. Learner provides a strategic
approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical
thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not
immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and
reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the
assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development
of ideas throughout assignment.
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Organization of Ideas/Format – 20 points
Beginning
Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization.
Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or
explanation of key terms. The lack of appropriate references or
source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional
help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise
the assignment.
Developing
Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student
uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies
throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous
pattern of logical sequencing. Student uses fewer sources or
references than required by assignment. Academic sources are
lacking.
Accomplished
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the
6. assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in
formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student
presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few
formatting errors. Assignment contains number of academic
sources required in assignment.
Exemplary
Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all
major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach
to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall
format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished
assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize
research in a logical sequence. Student uses required number of
academic sources or beyond.
_____________________________________________________
_________________________
Writing Conventions (Grammar and Mechanics) – 20 points
Beginning
Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or
expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and
needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors.
Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student
needs to review and revise assignment.
Developing
Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than
five errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not
completely explained by student. Student uses a basic
vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average,
but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter.
Accomplished
Student provides an effective display of good writing and
grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select
7. appropriate word usage and present an above average
presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be
well written with no more than three-five errors. Student
provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal
requirements.
Exemplary
Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as
well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style.
Presents a thorough and extensive understanding of word usage.
Student excels in the selection and development of a well-
planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and
reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic
assignment.
Research Approacches Lesson
Quantitative Research: Quantitative methods commonly use
numbers and analyze numerical data to make inferences about
what they mean in a research problem. Quantitative methods do
not always require statistic,s but most researchers think of
descriptive statistical approaches as a way to create images of
data distribution which the researcher will interpret to support
or refute his hypothesis.
· Statistics is the “science of collecting, analyzing, and drawing
conclusions from masses of numerical data” (Clauser 2010,
106). There are three main types of statistics: descriptive,
sampling theory, and inferential statistics.
· Descriptive statistics enable a researcher to understand the
spread of data over a given period of time.
· Sampling enables one to make inferences about a larger group
based on the “sample” if a representative few.
· Finally, inferential statistics can enable a researcher to draw
conclusions based on relationships between data or data sets
8. (Clauser 2010, 106-128).
The primary advantage to quantitative approaches is that it
enables a researcher to take a large amount of data and derive
from it certain data that is unbiased, based solely on analysis of
the data and how the analytical program is set up to measure
and interpret it. The disadvantage is that it requires significant
data to achieve a result that can generate conclusions about the
world. Also, interpretation of the data may not be reliable if
there is any departure from the original test or if the method in
which the data was collected was flawed.
Qualitative research approaches are based on the examination,
analysis, and interpretation of observations and rely on human
interaction and interpretation to make conclusions about
relationships, patterns of behavior, and how and why humans
act as they do. The reading on Qualitative Methods in your
Lessons folder provides a longer explanation of the types of
qualitative methods, including surveys, interviewing individuals
and groups, observation, case studies, and focus group studies.
There are other qualitative research approaches, to include:
· Ethnographic Research: methods that collect data on cultures
that researchers use to create theories about the connections
between culture and behavior;
· Critical and Ethical Inquiry: methods used to develop theories
about how people communicate, develop symbolic meanings,
and express behavior and beliefs based on the notions of
obligation, duty, right and wrong, and other behaviors based on
humans making choices;
· Historical research: a method that enables one to consider the
role of history in context to other events. Researchers find
some leverage in these methods that ask how history influences
the behaviors and belief systems of the research subjects.
· Document or content analysis: a method by which the
researcher derives facts from documents and other meaningful
artifacts of human life and attempts to interpret those facts into
a meaningful explanation of behavioral influences.
So, how does a researcher choose the best approach? Consider
9. this short article based on a business research topic. The
example below suggests several ways that a qualitative
researcher might triangulate data and move the research project
from specific data to general themes, and ultimately to a
research conclusion or finding. This article and material comes
from DeVault, Gigi.” Choosing Between Qualitative and
Quantitative Methods: What Are You Trying to Prove? “
Here are the elements:
Specific Consumer Interviews Consumers convey the reasons
why they leave items in online shopping carts and why they do
not complete online purchases.
Specific Website User Observations Researchers observe
consumers engaged in online shopping who report what they are
thinking as they shop.
General Researcher Field Notes Researchers record ideas that
emerge during the data collection process, such as: Online
shoppers tend to treat shopping carts like the dressing rooms in
actual shops, where leaving items behind is just part of the
shopping experience.
Research Conclusion Online shoppers engage in window
shopping as evidenced by the practice of leaving items in the
online shopping cart; this consumer behavior contributes to
feelings of familiarity with an online store which tends to draw
the consumer back to make purchases at more opportune times.
How does a market researcher know when to use a qualitative
approach and when to use a quantitative approach? Is one
approach really better than the other?
A choice between research methods rests fundamentally on a set
of decisions about the questions a researcher wants to answer
and the practicality of gathering the kind of data that will
answer those questions. The first step is to look for an obvious
fit.
Although there are a number of soft differences between the two
types of methods, there is one very important distinction.
Quantitative research is deductive and hinges on the presence of
10. a hypothesis that is developed before research begins.
Qualitative research is inductive and does not require a
hypothesis to start the research process. Let's take a closer look
at this important difference, and dig a bit deeper into three key
terms that help define quantitative and qualitative research.
Quantitative Research Confirms. Quantitative research looks at
the general case and moves toward the specific. This deductive
approach to research considers a potential cause of something
and hopes to verify its effect. Since the phrase “cause and
effect” is part of nearly every child's history of parental
lectures, we are all familiar with the concept. In research, cause
and effect is all about the strength of the relationship. If a very
strong relationship exists between two variables, the cause and
effect relationship may be said to be highly probable or highly
likely. There is still room to say that the effect does not occur
as a result of the cause, but this is considered not very probable.
The following is an example of a deductive market research
approach that seeks to measure differences in online purchasing
behavior and use of website shopping carts:
General Cause: The purchasing behavior of internet shoppers
who regularly place items in their online shopping cart but do
not complete many purchases differs from the purchasing
behavior of internet shoppers who do not use the cart to hold
items they never buy.
Specific Effect: Internet shoppers who habitually place items in
their online shopping carts but do not complete the purchases
are 75% more likely to return to the same websites and
complete a purchase within 7 days.
Research Finding: Retaining the online shopping cart contents
for 10 days when a consumer leaves a website before
completing a purchase is good business, and means a high
probability of future purchases by that consumer on the visited
website.
Hypothesis: A hypothesis is a tentative assumption in the form
of a statement or a question that a research effort is designed to
answer. In quantitative research, there are two hypothesis
11. statements. One hypothesis is called the null hypothesis, or Ho.
A researcher does not expect the null hypothesis to be true. At
the conclusion of the research process, the researcher will
analyze the data collected, and then will either accept or reject
the null hypothesis. Researchers refer to the process of
confirming a hypothesis -- the assumption -- as testing the
hypothesis.
The second hypothesis is called the alternative hypothesis, or
HA. The researcher assumes the alternative hypothesis is true.
Rejecting the null hypothesis suggests that the alternative
hypothesis may be true -- that is, the chance that there is an
error in the data that would make the alternative hypothesis not
true is acceptably small by scientific standards. Hypothesis
testing in quantitative research is never absolute. For example:
HO = Internet shoppers who place items in the cart before
leaving the website are no more likely to return and complete a
purchase than internet shoppers who do not place items in their
cart, but also return to the website.
HA = Internet shoppers who leave a website before purchasing
items they have placed in their cart are more likely to complete
a purchase on the same website in the near future.
Qualitative research begins with the specific and moves toward
the general. The data collecting process in qualitative research
is personal, field-based, and iterative or circular. As data are
collected and organized during analysis, patterns emerge.
Throughout the data collecting process, researchers typically
record their thoughts and impressions about the emerging data
patterns. Qualitative researchers gather data about their research
in several different ways or from many different sources.
The example below suggests several ways that a qualitative
researcher might triangulate data and move the research project
from specific data to general themes, and ultimately to a
research conclusion or finding:
· Specific Consumer Interviews: Consumers convey the reasons
why they leave items in online shopping carts and why they do
not complete online purchases.
12. · Specific Website User Observations Researchers observe
consumers engaged in online shopping who report what they are
thinking as they shop.
· General Researcher Field Notes Researchers record ideas that
emerge during the data collection process, such as: Online
shoppers tend to treat shopping carts like the dressing rooms in
actual shops, where leaving items behind is just part of the
shopping experience.
· Research Conclusion Online shoppers engage in window
shopping as evidenced by the practice of leaving items in the
online shopping cart. This consumer behavior contributes to
feelings of familiarity with an online store which tends to draw
the consumer back to make purchases at more opportune times.
Source: Choosing Between Qualitative and Quantitative
Methods: What Are You Trying to Prove?
http://marketresearch.about.com/od/market.research.techniques/
a/Choosing-Between-Qualitative-And-Quantitative-Methods.htm
References:
Clauser, Jerome and Jan Goldman. 2010. Introduction to
Intelligence Research and Analysis. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow
Press.
DeVault, Gigi. Choosing Between Qualitative and Quantitative
Methods: What Are You Trying to Prove? About.com Guide.
http://marketresearch.about.com/od/market.research.techniques/
a/Choosing-Between-Qualitative-And-Quantitative-Methods.htm
. (accessed January 28, 2012).