CJUS 310 Research Paper – Outline Instructions You must provide an in-depth outline of the research paper you plan to write based on the topic you selected in Module/Week 2. Your outline must contain headings that correlate to your chosen topic: Introduction First Heading Sub-heading Second Heading Sub-heading Third Heading Sub-heading Conclusion Reference List You must describe each point with 1–2 sentences. See the Research Paper – Final Draft Instructions for details on each section of the paper. See the Research Paper – Outline Grading Rubric for all grading criteria. You will receive written explanation if your outline needs to be modified. This assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 4. CJUS 310 Research Paper – Final Instructions Now that you have selected a topic, created an outline, and completed a rough draft, you will submit the final copy of your Research Paper. Below you will find detailed instructions for what needs to be included in each section of your paper as well as the details on the formatting. Research Paper Guidelines · Length of Paper: A minimum of 5 pages, excluding the title page, abstract, table of contents, reference list, and appendices. · References: A minimum of 5 primary references and 5 biblical references. All references must be cited in the body of the paper and included in the reference list. Biblical references are only cited in text. · Formatting: The paper must use 12-point, Times New Roman font and be double-spaced with 1-inch margins. The paper must follow current APA format. Content · Title Page: The title must be short and to the point. If the title is more than one line, double-space between the lines. The page header and page number appear at the top right of the title page. The title of the paper is centered on the page. Your name appears 1 double-space below the title. Your institutional affiliation appears 1 double-space below your name, then the course number and title 1 double-space below that. The running head must be in the upper right-hand corner. · Abstract: A synopsis or executive summary of your project that also describes the purpose of the project and what it accomplishes. · Introduction: A statement of your approach and assumptions, the background the reader needs to understand your approach, and an explanation of how you intend to address the main issues. · First Heading: Presents an overview of the history and/or current learning related to the topic, based on literature and electronic sources. It provides the reader with an in-depth understanding regarding the topic. · Second Heading: Provides the reader with an in-depth understanding of the topic and how the topic is applied in practical settings. · Third Heading: Integrates the information about the topic and makes assumptions about the current and future use of juvenile justice. The presentation must provide the reader with sufficient information to understand and support the assumptions. · Conclusi ...

1. CJUS 310
Research Paper – Outline Instructions
You must provide an in-depth outline of the research paper you
plan to write based on the topic you selected in Module/Week 2.
Your outline must contain headings that correlate to your
chosen topic:
Introduction
First Heading
Sub-heading
Second Heading
Sub-heading
Third Heading
Sub-heading
Conclusion
Reference List
You must describe each point with 1–2 sentences. See the
Research Paper – Final Draft Instructions for details on each
section of the paper.
See the Research Paper – Outline Grading Rubric for all grading
criteria. You will receive written explanation if your outline
needs to be modified.
This assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of
Module/Week 4.
CJUS 310
Research Paper – Final Instructions
Now that you have selected a topic, created an outline, and
completed a rough draft, you will submit the final copy of your
Research Paper. Below you will find detailed instructions for

2. what needs to be included in each section of your paper as well
as the details on the formatting.
Research Paper Guidelines
· Length of Paper: A minimum of 5 pages, excluding the title
page, abstract, table of contents, reference list, and appendices.
· References: A minimum of 5 primary references and 5 biblical
references. All references must be cited in the body of the paper
and included in the reference list. Biblical references are only
cited in text.
· Formatting: The paper must use 12-point, Times New Roman
font and be double-spaced with 1-inch margins. The paper must
follow current APA format.
Content
· Title Page: The title must be short and to the point. If the title
is more than one line, double-space between the lines. The page
header and page number appear at the top right of the title page.
The title of the paper is centered on the page. Your name
appears 1 double-space below the title. Your institutional
affiliation appears 1 double-space below your name, then the
course number and title 1 double-space below that. The running
head must be in the upper right-hand corner.
· Abstract: A synopsis or executive summary of your project
that also describes the purpose of the project and what it
accomplishes.
· Introduction: A statement of your approach and assumptions,
the background the reader needs to understand your approach,
and an explanation of how you intend to address the main
issues.
· First Heading: Presents an overview of the history and/or
current learning related to the topic, based on literature and
electronic sources. It provides the reader with an in-depth
understanding regarding the topic.
· Second Heading: Provides the reader with an in-depth
understanding of the topic and how the topic is applied in

3. practical settings.
· Third Heading: Integrates the information about the topic and
makes assumptions about the current and future use of juvenile
justice. The presentation must provide the reader with sufficient
information to understand and support the assumptions.
· Conclusion: Summarizes your findings and makes
recommendations on the impact of the juvenile justice system
on its services, quality, and delivery to our communities.
· References: Lists all of the primary references cited within the
body of the text. You must have a minimum of 5 references.
Note on Plagiarism: Your research paper will be checked for
plagiarism via SafeAssign. Make sure you pay careful attention
to summarizing, paraphrasing, and correctly citing your sources
in text and in the reference list. Additionally, you cannot use a
paper you have completed for another course for this course.
This assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of
Module/Week 7.
CJUS 310
Research Paper – Outline Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content (70%)
Advanced
90-100%
Proficient
70-89%
Developing
1-69%
Not present
Total

4. Topic
4 to 5 points
Outline is extremely clear and reflects an in-depth
understanding of the topic.
2 to 3 points
Outline is clear and reflects a clear understanding of the topic.
1 points
Outline expresses a clear and coherent idea.
0 points
Not present
Themes
9 to 10 points
Themes are extremely clear and logical; organization of ideas is
very effective.
6 to 8 points
Themes are clear and logical; organization of ideas is effective.
1 to 5 points
Themes are unclear or illogical.
0 points
Not present
Points
18 to 20 points
The major points of the paper are definitely and precisely
articulated.
14 to 17 points
The major points of the paper are clearly stated.

5. 1 to 13 points
Not all the major points of the paper are clearly stated.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
90-100%
Proficient
70-89%
Developing
1-69%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Formatting
7 to 8 points
Spelling and grammar are correct. Where applicable, references
are cited in current APA format.
5 to 6 points
Spelling and grammar have some errors. Where applicable,
references are cited with some APA formatting.
1 to 4 points
Many spelling and grammar errors distract. Where applicable,
references are minimally or not cited in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Organization
6 to 7 points
Outline format makes it extremely easy to see the relationships
between ideas and supporting information.
4 to 5 points
Outline format shows the relationships between ideas and
supporting information.
1 to 3 points

6. Outline format is occasionally unclear or inappropriate; does
not always clearly show the relationships between ideas and
supporting information.
0 points
Not present
Professor Comments:
Total:
CJUS 310
Research Paper – Final Draft Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content (70%)
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Total
Theme
19 to 22 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to
help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and
exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
15 to 18 points
Student establishes a good comprehension of the intended
assignment including the building of the thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most of

7. the support statements helping to support the key focus of
assignment.
1 to 14 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended
assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the
assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing
linkages between thoughts. Student has included a few
supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of
the assignment.
0 points
Not present
Content Knowledge
27 to 30 points
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter
in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of
depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical
examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
21 to 26 points
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in
assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating
course content in examples given. Details and facts presented
provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of
subject matter knowledge.
1 to 20 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general,
fundamental understanding of the course material. There are
areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts
and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts,
but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
0 points
Not present
Critical Thinking

8. 18 to 20 points
Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking
necessary for undergraduate work. Learner provides a strategic
approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical
thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not
immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and
reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the
assignment. Solid and clear Biblical ideas are integrated
throughout the paper to provide support for opinions and
empirical sources.
14 to 17 points
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in
the presentation of material and supporting statements.
Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of
relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student
provides adequate conclusions, with two or fewer errors.
Biblical ideas are integrated throughout the paper to provide
support for opinions and empirical sources.
1 to 13 points
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the
reader through various linkages and connections presented in
assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on
key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have
problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.
Biblical ideas are not well integrated throughout the paper to
provide support for opinions and empirical sources.
0 points
Not present
Organization
18 to 20 points
Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all
major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach
to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall
format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and a conclusion.

9. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and
organize research in a logical sequence.
14 to 17 points
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the
assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in
formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student
presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few
formatting errors. Assignment contains less than 5 resources.
1 to 13 points
Student applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student
uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies
throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous
pattern of logical sequencing. Student uses less than 3 sources
or references.
0 points
Not present
Citations & Support
18 to 20 points
Five primary and five Biblical references that are significant to
the study (current, relevant, credible, and authoritative) are
included. All references (in-text & listed) are cited in current
APA format.
14 to 17 points
Three to primary and Biblical references that are significant to
the study (current, relevant, credible, and authoritative) are
included. All references (in-text & listed) are cited in current
APA format.
1 to 13 points
Two or less primary and Biblical references that are significant
to the study (current, relevant, credible, and authoritative) are
included. All references (in-text & listed) are cited in current
APA format.
0 points
Not present

10. Structure (30%)
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Writing
43 to 48 points
Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, and
presents research in a clear and concise writing style.
Demonstrates a thorough, and extensive understanding of word
usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a
well-planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and
reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic
assignment. Paper follows current APA format.
33 to 42 points
Student provides an effective display of good writing and
grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select
appropriate word usage and present an above average
presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be
well written with no more than three to five errors. Student
provides a final written product that covers the minimal
requirements. Paper format follows APA format with minor
errors.
1 to 32 points
Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but contains
more than five errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat
vague and not completely explained by student. Student uses a
basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is
average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject
matter. Paper format minimally follows APA format.
0 points
Not present

11. Professor Comments:
Total: