The feedback of the questionnaires

1. Post-questionnaire
Results
Created by JasdeepKaurJabbal
– JRS Production

2. How will the feedback benefit the
production?
 The feedback will help us improve, as we are able to
gain an insight of our audience. Their feedback and
criticism helps to improve our film.
 With the feedback given we can see the strengths and
weaknesses.

3. Question 1:
Are you male or female?
Gender
no
40%
yes
60%

4.  The questionnaire was given to 6 males and 4
femalesas this questionnaire was voluntarily. This shows
that males might have more interest in thriller films.
 The results show
 40% - Females
 60% - Males
 This agrees with the stereotyping of males liking thriller
films more than females. This helps us know that our film
is made for our both sex’s.

5. Question 2:
How effective was our
opening sequence?
1
2
0%
3
4
0%
5
6
0% 0%
11%
7
8
9
0%
11%
22%
22%
34%
10

6.  34% of the audience gave a 10/10 in the effectiveness of
the opening sequence, this shows a good sign of the
opening sequence to be liked.
 22% of the audience gave 6/10 and 8/10 this also shows
the audience to have an increase in effectiveness.
 11% of the audience gave 7/10 and 9/10 this shows that
the audience thinks that the effectiveness is averaged
out in the opening sequence.
 None of the audience (0%) gave 1/10, 2/10, 3/10, 4/10
and 5/10. This shows that the effectiveness is well
conveyed and that the audience will enjoy the opening
sequence.

7. Question 3:
 1:
Did the opening scene intrigued you to
want watch more of the film?
no
30%
yes
70%

8.  30% of the participants said that the opening scene did
not intrigued them to watch more of the film whereas70%
of the participants said that they are intrigued to watch
more of the film.
 To makes the30% intrigued to watch the film we have to
improve on the storyline and the ending, also the ending
could end by a cliff-hanger to grab the audiences
attention.

9. Question 3:
 2:
Was it easy to distinguish the antagonist
and the protagonist?
no
0%
yes
100%

10.  All (100%) of the participants say that they have
distinguish the antagonist and the protagonist. This is
good as we can see that they have clearly understood
the storyline and they understand each character.

11. Question 3:
 3:
Is the actors portrayed their character
effectively?
no
20%
yes
80%

12.  80% of the audience say that the actors have portrayed
their character effectively and 20% of the participants
say that actors did not portray their character effectively.
 This shows that we might need to train and make the
actors to be more effective with what they are doing.
This might make the 20% of the participants to believe
that the actors acted effectively.

13. Question 3:
 4:
Did the opening sequence follow the
convention of a thriller film?
no
40%
yes
60%

14.  According to the audience the opening sequence follow
the convention of a thriller film.
 As60% of the audience said that the film was recognised
to be a thriller and40% said that the film was not.
 This makes us want to change the40% of the audience
to make then also recognise it is a thriller film.
 This will be done by intensifying scenes to make then
look completely thriller like.

15. Question 3:
 5:
Was the camera angles and movement
effective?
no
30%
yes
70%

16.  As we were not completely satisfied with the camera
angles and movements, we added this question to get a
insight of what the audience thinks.
 70% of the audience thinks that the camera angles and
movement effectiveand 30% of the audience think the
camera angles and movement were not effective.
 This information helped us to improve on our camera
angles and movements to make them better and
effective.

17. Question 3:
 6:
Was the editing effective?
no
40%
yes
60%

18.  We were not fully satisfied with the editing done so we
decided to add this question to get a insight of what the
audience makes of the editing.
 60% of the audience think that the editing was effective
and only 40% of the audience think that the editing was
not effective and needs improving.
 This helps us to improve as we would like the40% of the
audience to think that the editing was effective. So these
results show that the editing might be needed to be
improved on some areas but over all it is good.

19. Question 3:
 7:
Was the narrative simple to follow?
no
40%
yes
60%

20.  60% of the audience believes that the narrative was
simple to follow and only 40% think that the narrative
was not simple to follow.
 This shows that the narrative needs a little tweaking so
that the 40% of the participants are able to follow the
narrative simply .

21. Question 3:
 8:
Do you think that our production meets a
professional standards?
no
20%
yes
80%

22.  80% of the audience think that JRS Productions meets
the professional standards and 20% of the audience
believe that JRS Production does not meet the
professional standards.
 These results show that JRS Productions needs to
increase on the professional standards for the 20% of
the audience to agree that our production meets the
professional standards.

23. Conclusion:
 As a group, we are planning to use this feedback to
help us reconstruct areas of the film, and to address to
the technical areas such as editing and camera
movements and angles.
 This helps us see our strengths and weaknesses and it
has been helpful as it helps us to take the right decision
to hopefully make the opening sequence successful by
the feedback.