SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
Download to read offline
1
Geotechnical Testing Methods II
Ajanta Sachan
Assistant Professor
Civil Engineering
IIT Gandhinagar
2
FIELD TESTING
2
Field Test (In-situ Test)
 When it is difficult to obtain “undisturbed” samples.
In case of Cohesionless soils, Sensitive clays, etc.
 Advantage:
 Testing on natural soil under undisturbed
conditions
 Disadvantage:
 Testing conditions are not controlled
 Time dependent phenomenon are difficult to
control due to large scale
 Measurements/instrumentation is tricky and
rather a difficult task
 In-situ shear strength tests
 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
 Cone Penetration Test (CPT)
 Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT)
 Vane Shear Test (VST)
 Dilatometer Test (DMT)
 Pressure meter Test (PMT)
 Settlement test
 Plate Load Test
Field Test (In-situ Test)
3
5
Common In Situ Testing Devices
In bore holes
DMTVST
SPT
CPT
PMT
DCPT
6
Standard Penetration Test
IS: 2131-1981
4
7
Standard Penetration Test
 Components
 Drilling Equipment
 Inner diameter of hole  100 to 150 mm
 Casing may be used in case of soft/non-cohesive soils
 Split spoon sampler  IS:9640-1980
 Drive weight assembly
 Falling Weight = 63.5 Kg
 Fall height = 75 cm
 Others  Lifting bail, Tongs, ropes, screw jack, etc.
 Procedure
 The bore hole is advanced to desired depth and bottom is cleaned.
 Split spoon sampler is attached to a drill rod and rested on bore
hole bottom.
 Driving mass is dropped onto the drill rod repeatedly and the
sampler is driven into soil for a distance of 450 mm. The number of
blow for each 150 mm penetration are recorded.
 Procedure (Cont….)
 N-value
 First 150 mm penetration is considered as seating penetration
 The number of blows for the last two 150 mm penetration are
added together and reported as N-value for the depth of bore
hole.
 The split spoon sampler is recovered, and sample is
collected from split barrel so as to preserve moisture
content and sent to the laboratory for further analysis.
 SPT is repeated at every 750 mm or 1500 mm interval
for larger depths.
 Under the following conditions the penetration is
referred to as refusal and test is halted
a) 50 blows are required for any 150 mm penetration
b)100 blows are required for last 300 mm penetration
c) 10 successive blows produce no advancement
Standard Penetration Test
5
Precautions during SPT
 The ht. of free fall Must be 750 mm
 The fall of hammer must be free, frictionless and vertical
 Cutting shoe of the sampler must be free from wear & tear
 The bottom of the bore hole must be cleaned to collect
undisturbed sample
 When SPT is done in a sandy soil below water table , the
water level in the bore hole MUST be maintained higher
than the ground water level.
Otherwise: QUICK condition!!
Very Low N value
Correction for Overburden Pressure :
N' = Corrected value of
observed N
CN = Correction factor for
overburden pressure
' .NN C N
Peck, Hanson and Thornburn
(1974)
p' = Effective overburden pressure at a depth
corresponding to N-value measurement
SPT Corrections
6
SPT Corrections
Correction for Dilatancy :
[ ]
Correction for Overburden Pressure : (Alternative)
Alternative -
If the stratum consists of fine sand and silt below water table, for N' > 15,
the dilatancy correction is applied as
SPT Hammer Energy Correction
 Energy is dissipated in some fraction during the impact, and the
output energy is usually in the range of 50% to 80% of energy input.
 For rope pully system with safety hammer
 The N-value is standardized for 60 % energy output. For other
hammers, the N-value may be corrected in ratio of their energy
input
 Although IS 2131-1981 is silent on this issue, the correction may be
applied as per the requirement of the project.
60%out
in
E
E

 
60
%
.
60
out inE E
N N
7
SPT Test Data
No. of blows per 0.30m
Data from different bore holes
Interpretation from SPT: Cohesionless Soils
N'' f' Dr (%) consistency
0-4 25-30 0-15 very loose
4-10 27-32 15-35 loose
10-30 30-35 35-65 medium
30-50 35-40 65-85 dense
>50 38-43 85-100 very dense
8
0.689
0.193
'
N
OCR
p
 
  
  MN/m2
Interpretation from SPT: Cohesive Soils
N cu (kPa) consistency visual identification
0-2 0 - 12 very soft Thumb can penetrate > 25 mm
2-4 12-25 soft Thumb can penetrate 25 mm
4-8 25-50 medium Thumb penetrates with moderate effort
8-15 50-100 stiff Thumb will indent 8 mm
15-30 100-200 very stiff Can indent with thumb nail; not thumb
>30 >200 hard Cannot indent even with thumb nail
not corrected for overburden 6.25. in kPauc N
Mayne and Kemper (1988)
Cone Penetration Test (CPT)
IS: 4968 (Part –III)
9
17
CPT Procedure
 Push the sounding rod with cone into the ground for some specified
depth. Then push the cone with friction sleeve for another specified
depth (> 35 mm). Repeat the process with/without friction sleeve.
 Pushing rate = 1 cm/s
 Mantle tube is push simultaneously such that it is always above the
cone and friction sleeve.
 Tip Load, Qc = Load from pressure gauge reading + Wt. of cone +
Wt. of connecting sounding rods
 Tip resistance 
 With friction sleeve  add its self weight as well  Qt = Qc + Qf
 Frictional resistance 
 Friction Ratio 
c
c
c
Q
q
A

x-sectional area off cone = 10 cm2
surface area of friction sleeve
t c
f
f
Q Q
q
A


f
r
c
q
f
q
 Typical range 
0%
10%
Cohesive
Granular
CPT Results
& Soil
Classification
10
Typical
CPT Data
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
CPT Cone Resistance, qc1
(MPa)
Mean
Mean-SD
Mean+SD
0 10 20 30
SPT Blow Count, N1(60)
(Blows/300 mm)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Relative Density, Dr
(%)
From CPT
From SPT
Interpreted
Soil Profile
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DepthBelowExcavatedSurface(m)
Interbedded
Fine Sand
and
Silty Sand
(SP-SM)
Fine Silty
Sand
(SM)
Gray Silty
Clay (CL)
Sand (SP)
Fine Sand
w/ Shells
(SP)
11
InterpretedSoilProfile
EQDrainTest Area1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Depth(m)
Sand
Siltysand/sand
Silt andSandy
Silt
Sandto
SiltySand
ConeTip
Resistance, q c
(MPa)
0 2 4 6 8 1012
FrictonRatio, F r
(%)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Relative
Density, D r
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
PorePressure, u
(kPa)
-100 0 100 200
CPT Profile for Piezocone
CPT Versus SPT
 CPT: Advantages over SPT
 provides much better resolution, reliability
 versatility; pore water pressure, dynamic soil
properties
 CPT: Disadvantages
 Does not give a sample
 Will not work with soil with gravel
 Need to mobilize a special rig
12
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT)
 Components:
1) Cone (dia = 50 mm)
~usually made of steel
IS: 4968 (Part – I, II)
SPT
DCPT
Hollow (split spoon)
Solid (no samples)
2) Driving rods/drill
rods
~marked at every 100 mm
DCPT Procedure
 Cone – drill rod – driving head assembly is installed
vertically on the ground and hammer is dropped from
standard height repeatedly
 The blow counts are recorded for every 100 mm penetration.
A sum of three consecutive values i.e. 300 mm is noted as the
dynamic cone resistance, Ncd at that depth.
 The cone is driven up to refusal or the project specified depth.
 In the end, the drill rod is withdrawn. The cone is left in the
ground if unthreaded or recovered if threaded.
 No sample recovered
 Fast testing – less project cost / cover large area in due time
 Use of bentonite slurry is optional, which is used to reduce
friction on the driving rods.
• Modified cone is used in this case: diameter = 62.5 mm
13
 For clays, and mainly for soft clays.
 Measure torque required to quickly
shear the vane pushed into soft clay.
torque  undrained shear strength cu
 Typical d = 20-100 mm.
25
Vane Shear Test (VST)
vane
 undrained
bore hole
soft clay
measuring (torque)
head
vane
h2d
d
Vane Shear Test
Test in Progress Failure surface
2
2.
. . .
1
3.
u
T
c
D H
D
H
 


 
3
0.273u
T
c
D

Interpretation:
Undrained shear
strength -
For H = 2.D
14
27
60 mm dia.
Flexible
membrane
 Insert DMT using SPT
drilling equipment to the
desired depth and pressure
the cell
 Measure pressure when the
membrane is flushed with
plate and when it enters
ground by 1.1 mm.
 Decrease the pressure &
measure the pressure when
membrane is again flushed
with plate.
 Determined:
 Elastic Modulus
 Soil Type and state
Dilatometer Test (DMT)
Pressure meter
Test (PMT)
Determined:
Elastic Young Mod, E
Shear Mod, G
Undrained shear strength, Su
15
29
Pressure meter Test (PMT)
Measurements:
1. Fluid Pressure
2. Fluid volume change
Plate Load Test
This test is used to estimate the
Elastic Modulus and Bearing
Capacity of soils which are not
easily sampled.
Bearing Capacity Estimation: The
load is applied such that the rate of
penetration remains constant. A
load-settlement curve is produced.
Equations have been developed to
obtain undrained shear strength
from ultimate bearing capacity.
Modulus Estimation: The load is
applied to the plate in increments of one
fifth of the design load. Time-settlement
and load-settlement curves are then
produced to estimate modulus of soil
from the test results.
16
ROCK TESTING
Rock Testing
 Unconfined Compression Test
 Brazilian Test
 Point Load Test
 Direct Shear Test
 Slake Durability Test
 Schmidt Rebound Hardness Test
 Sound Velocity Test
 In-situ stress measurements in rocks
17
Core cutting &
grinding machine:
Cutting and grinding
cylindrical rock specimens
core size: EX to NX
Polishing & Lapping machine
Core drilling machine:
Rock core preparation
For regular and irregular
Samples.
core size: EX to 100mm
Specimen Preparation Equipments for
Rock Testing
Rock Core sizes:
EX = 21.46 mm
AX = 30.10 mm
BX = 42.04 mm
NX = 54.74 mm
More: 35mm, 50mm,
75mm, 100 mm
Rock Samples
Granite:
High stiffness
High strength
Very brittle
Limestone:
Medium stiffness
Medium strength
Medium brittleness
Shale:
Low stiffness
Low strength
Ductile
18
Unconfined Compression Test
 This test is performed to obtain
the unconfined compressive
strength (UCS) of intact rock
cores (slenderness ratio = 2).
 UCS is the maximum stress that
that rock specimen can sustain.
 Rock specimen is kept in a
loading frame, and if required
heated to the desired test
temperature.
 Axial load is continuously
increased on the specimen until
peak load and failure are
obtained.
Brazilian test: Tensile strength of Rock
 Brazilian test is performed to obtain the
tensile strength of rock mass.
 Tensile strength of rock is imp to know
for drilling, blasting of rocks, failure of
roof and floor of tunnels, chambers &
underground roadways; often weak
rocks fail in tension exhibiting splitting
mode of failure.
 In this test, a disc/cylinder is subjected
to a line load, and fracture should
initiate at the centre and progress
towards periphery. If opposite, the test
is discarded as considered that it did
not fail in tension.
19
Point Load Test: compress. strength of irregular rock sp.
 When regular cores could not be obtained;
only irregular pieces are available from
the rock excavation, Point load test is
performed to obtain the compressive
strength of rock mass.
 The roughly chiseled spherical mass with
dia. ranging between 30-50 mm is tested
between two hard conical tips in a rigid
frame.
Direct Shear Test:
Normal stress versus Shear stress response of rock mass
 It measures peak and residual direct shear strength as a function of
stress normal to the sheared plane.
 It can be used for testing for both: core & lump specimens.
Shear box size: 300mm x 300mm x 100mm
20
Triaxial Shear Test:
shear strength parameters (c, f) of rock mass
 Triaxial cells for testing rocks are
designed to withstand a confining
pressure 150 Kg/cm2.
 Mostly triaxial tests on rock
specimens are performed under no
volume change conditions.
 Stress-strain curve is obtained using
deviator stress and axial strain. The
modulus and failure deviator stress
are estimated. Shear strength
parameters (c & f ) are calculated
adopting similar methods as in soils
 If the strain gauges are attached to
measure the lateral strain, poisson’s
ratio (n) also can be obtained.
Slake Durability Test:
Resistance of rock mass to disintegration during wetting-drying
 Rock fragments of known
weight placed in rotating drum
apparatus, and rock pieces
(approx 10 pieces, each 40-60gm
weight) are circulated through
wet and dry cycles.
 Re-weigh the rock fragments to
determine the slake durability
index (SDI).
 Mostly, this test allows the rock
mass to get exposed up to two
cycles of wetting and drying.
21
Schmidt Test: Hardness of rock
 Schmidt test is performed
to determine the rebound
hardness of rock.
 The plunger of the hammer
is pressed against the
specimen and the height of
rebound of the plunger on
a scale is taken as the
measure of hardness.
Sound Velocity Test: P & S-wave velocity of rocks
 It is non-destructive test and performed to determine the
velocity of elastic wave propagation through rock in the
laboratory.
 slenderness ratio used for the test is usually 3. Test can be
conducted on dry, moist or saturated specimens.
 A transmitter and a receiver are attached at sides of rock
specimen (a thin layer of grease is applied on the
specimen’s ends to have proper contact with transducers).
 The energy transmission between the transducers
(transmitter and receiver) is used to determine the
velocities of P and S wave.
22
In-situ stress measurements in rocks
In-situ stress measurements in rocks:
Testing methods on Field
23
In-situ stress measurements in rocks:
Flat Jack Test
In-situ stress measurements in rocks:
Hydrofracturing Test
24
Thank You

More Related Content

What's hot

soil_mechanics_lecture_slides
soil_mechanics_lecture_slidessoil_mechanics_lecture_slides
soil_mechanics_lecture_slides
Mahendra Gattu
 

What's hot (20)

Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #3: Direct Shear Test)
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #3: Direct Shear Test)Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #3: Direct Shear Test)
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #3: Direct Shear Test)
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #2: Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #2: Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #2: Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #2: Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria]
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #25: In-Situ Permeability]
 
Triaxial shear test and shear strength properties of soil
Triaxial shear test and shear strength properties of soilTriaxial shear test and shear strength properties of soil
Triaxial shear test and shear strength properties of soil
 
Standard penetration test
Standard penetration testStandard penetration test
Standard penetration test
 
Shear strength of soils
Shear strength of soils Shear strength of soils
Shear strength of soils
 
Lec5
Lec5Lec5
Lec5
 
soil_mechanics_lecture_slides
soil_mechanics_lecture_slidessoil_mechanics_lecture_slides
soil_mechanics_lecture_slides
 
Standard penetration test (spt)
Standard penetration test (spt)Standard penetration test (spt)
Standard penetration test (spt)
 
Weathering of Rocks: Laboratory Test
Weathering of Rocks: Laboratory TestWeathering of Rocks: Laboratory Test
Weathering of Rocks: Laboratory Test
 
site investigation by snjv sir
site investigation by snjv sirsite investigation by snjv sir
site investigation by snjv sir
 
Class 6 Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 6    Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 6    Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 6 Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #23: Soil Permeability]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #23: Soil Permeability]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #23: Soil Permeability]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #23: Soil Permeability]
 
Seepage through soil
Seepage through soilSeepage through soil
Seepage through soil
 
Method of-slices
Method of-slicesMethod of-slices
Method of-slices
 
SPT, SCPT, and DCPT Correlation for SC, CL, and SM-SC Soils: A Case Study of ...
SPT, SCPT, and DCPT Correlation for SC, CL, and SM-SC Soils: A Case Study of ...SPT, SCPT, and DCPT Correlation for SC, CL, and SM-SC Soils: A Case Study of ...
SPT, SCPT, and DCPT Correlation for SC, CL, and SM-SC Soils: A Case Study of ...
 
Class 8 Triaxial Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 8    Triaxial Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 8    Triaxial Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 8 Triaxial Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 
Stress distribution of the soil
Stress distribution of the soilStress distribution of the soil
Stress distribution of the soil
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #19: Consolidation-III]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #19: Consolidation-III]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #19: Consolidation-III]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #19: Consolidation-III]
 
Strength nalin
Strength nalinStrength nalin
Strength nalin
 

Viewers also liked

Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity LimitStandard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
gurjapsinghsomal
 
137518876 bearing-capacity-from-spt
137518876 bearing-capacity-from-spt 137518876 bearing-capacity-from-spt
137518876 bearing-capacity-from-spt
James Chan
 
300 solved problems_in_geotechnical_engineering
300 solved problems_in_geotechnical_engineering300 solved problems_in_geotechnical_engineering
300 solved problems_in_geotechnical_engineering
Gizachew Kefelew
 

Viewers also liked (16)

Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity LimitStandard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
 
137518876 bearing-capacity-from-spt
137518876 bearing-capacity-from-spt 137518876 bearing-capacity-from-spt
137518876 bearing-capacity-from-spt
 
Geotechnical Aspects
Geotechnical AspectsGeotechnical Aspects
Geotechnical Aspects
 
12a ensayos in situ spt
12a   ensayos in situ spt12a   ensayos in situ spt
12a ensayos in situ spt
 
A Practical Reliability-Based Method for Assessing Soil Liquefaction Potential
A Practical Reliability-Based Method for Assessing Soil Liquefaction PotentialA Practical Reliability-Based Method for Assessing Soil Liquefaction Potential
A Practical Reliability-Based Method for Assessing Soil Liquefaction Potential
 
Geotechnical Aspects of EQ Resistant Design
Geotechnical Aspects of EQ Resistant DesignGeotechnical Aspects of EQ Resistant Design
Geotechnical Aspects of EQ Resistant Design
 
Site inveswtigation vandana miss
Site inveswtigation vandana missSite inveswtigation vandana miss
Site inveswtigation vandana miss
 
In situ permeability testing in boreholes
In situ permeability testing in boreholesIn situ permeability testing in boreholes
In situ permeability testing in boreholes
 
Methods of in site Permeability Test
Methods of in site Permeability TestMethods of in site Permeability Test
Methods of in site Permeability Test
 
Class 3 (a) Soil Plasticity (Atterberg Limits) ( Geotechenical Engineering )
Class 3 (a)   Soil Plasticity (Atterberg Limits) ( Geotechenical Engineering )Class 3 (a)   Soil Plasticity (Atterberg Limits) ( Geotechenical Engineering )
Class 3 (a) Soil Plasticity (Atterberg Limits) ( Geotechenical Engineering )
 
Geotechnical investigation for road work
Geotechnical investigation for road workGeotechnical investigation for road work
Geotechnical investigation for road work
 
Cone Penetration Test
Cone Penetration TestCone Penetration Test
Cone Penetration Test
 
300 solved problems_in_geotechnical_engineering
300 solved problems_in_geotechnical_engineering300 solved problems_in_geotechnical_engineering
300 solved problems_in_geotechnical_engineering
 
Bearing capacity
Bearing capacityBearing capacity
Bearing capacity
 
Bearing capacity of Soil
Bearing capacity of SoilBearing capacity of Soil
Bearing capacity of Soil
 
Permeability and factors affecting permeability
Permeability and factors affecting permeability Permeability and factors affecting permeability
Permeability and factors affecting permeability
 

Similar to Geotechnical testign methods ii as

FIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptx
FIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptxFIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptx
FIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptx
sbarai0802
 
م.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمة
م.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمةم.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمة
م.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمة
Egyptian Engineers Association
 
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Unisoft software   bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudraultUnisoft software   bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
cfpbolivia
 

Similar to Geotechnical testign methods ii as (20)

Presentation on standard penertation test
Presentation on standard penertation testPresentation on standard penertation test
Presentation on standard penertation test
 
GI MOD 3.pptx
GI MOD 3.pptxGI MOD 3.pptx
GI MOD 3.pptx
 
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation SPT
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation SPTBearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation SPT
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation SPT
 
FIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptx
FIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptxFIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptx
FIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptx
 
م.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمة
م.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمةم.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمة
م.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمة
 
Standard Penetration Test for soils
Standard Penetration Test for soilsStandard Penetration Test for soils
Standard Penetration Test for soils
 
Applications of Vane Shear Test in Geotechnical soil investigations
Applications of Vane Shear Test in Geotechnical soil investigationsApplications of Vane Shear Test in Geotechnical soil investigations
Applications of Vane Shear Test in Geotechnical soil investigations
 
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow FoundationBearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
 
SPT Field Test.pdf
SPT Field Test.pdfSPT Field Test.pdf
SPT Field Test.pdf
 
6._Bearing_Capacity_from_other_methods.pdf
6._Bearing_Capacity_from_other_methods.pdf6._Bearing_Capacity_from_other_methods.pdf
6._Bearing_Capacity_from_other_methods.pdf
 
SPT-TOPIC-19 (1).pptx
SPT-TOPIC-19 (1).pptxSPT-TOPIC-19 (1).pptx
SPT-TOPIC-19 (1).pptx
 
lecture_Exploration.ppt shear strength ppt soil mechanics and ppts
lecture_Exploration.ppt shear strength ppt soil mechanics and pptslecture_Exploration.ppt shear strength ppt soil mechanics and ppts
lecture_Exploration.ppt shear strength ppt soil mechanics and ppts
 
Unconfined Compression Test
Unconfined Compression TestUnconfined Compression Test
Unconfined Compression Test
 
CVEN 440_540 Classnotes (6) --- Static analysis of pile foundation.pptx
CVEN 440_540 Classnotes (6) --- Static analysis of pile foundation.pptxCVEN 440_540 Classnotes (6) --- Static analysis of pile foundation.pptx
CVEN 440_540 Classnotes (6) --- Static analysis of pile foundation.pptx
 
SPT and VST- By Daanyal Umar.pptx
SPT and VST- By Daanyal Umar.pptxSPT and VST- By Daanyal Umar.pptx
SPT and VST- By Daanyal Umar.pptx
 
10570216.ppt
10570216.ppt10570216.ppt
10570216.ppt
 
Soil penetration tests
Soil penetration testsSoil penetration tests
Soil penetration tests
 
Standard_Penetration_Test__SPT_.pptx
Standard_Penetration_Test__SPT_.pptxStandard_Penetration_Test__SPT_.pptx
Standard_Penetration_Test__SPT_.pptx
 
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Pe Test Geotechnical RerviewPe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
 
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Unisoft software   bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudraultUnisoft software   bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
 

Recently uploaded

scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
HenryBriggs2
 
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - NeometrixIntegrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Neometrix_Engineering_Pvt_Ltd
 
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakesDeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
MayuraD1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

2016EF22_0 solar project report rooftop projects
2016EF22_0 solar project report rooftop projects2016EF22_0 solar project report rooftop projects
2016EF22_0 solar project report rooftop projects
 
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
scipt v1.pptxcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
 
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptxCOST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
 
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planes
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planesEngineering Drawing focus on projection of planes
Engineering Drawing focus on projection of planes
 
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech studentsAIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
 
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equation
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equationDC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equation
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equation
 
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - VThermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
 
Bridge Jacking Design Sample Calculation.pptx
Bridge Jacking Design Sample Calculation.pptxBridge Jacking Design Sample Calculation.pptx
Bridge Jacking Design Sample Calculation.pptx
 
Thermal Engineering Unit - I & II . ppt
Thermal Engineering  Unit - I & II . pptThermal Engineering  Unit - I & II . ppt
Thermal Engineering Unit - I & II . ppt
 
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPTGenerative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
 
Rums floating Omkareshwar FSPV IM_16112021.pdf
Rums floating Omkareshwar FSPV IM_16112021.pdfRums floating Omkareshwar FSPV IM_16112021.pdf
Rums floating Omkareshwar FSPV IM_16112021.pdf
 
Bhubaneswar🌹Call Girls Bhubaneswar ❤Komal 9777949614 💟 Full Trusted CALL GIRL...
Bhubaneswar🌹Call Girls Bhubaneswar ❤Komal 9777949614 💟 Full Trusted CALL GIRL...Bhubaneswar🌹Call Girls Bhubaneswar ❤Komal 9777949614 💟 Full Trusted CALL GIRL...
Bhubaneswar🌹Call Girls Bhubaneswar ❤Komal 9777949614 💟 Full Trusted CALL GIRL...
 
Online food ordering system project report.pdf
Online food ordering system project report.pdfOnline food ordering system project report.pdf
Online food ordering system project report.pdf
 
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced LoadsFEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
 
Introduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
Introduction to Serverless with AWS LambdaIntroduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
Introduction to Serverless with AWS Lambda
 
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - NeometrixIntegrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
 
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.pptThermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
 
Learn the concepts of Thermodynamics on Magic Marks
Learn the concepts of Thermodynamics on Magic MarksLearn the concepts of Thermodynamics on Magic Marks
Learn the concepts of Thermodynamics on Magic Marks
 
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakesDeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
DeepFakes presentation : brief idea of DeepFakes
 
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueDouble Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
 

Geotechnical testign methods ii as

  • 1. 1 Geotechnical Testing Methods II Ajanta Sachan Assistant Professor Civil Engineering IIT Gandhinagar 2 FIELD TESTING
  • 2. 2 Field Test (In-situ Test)  When it is difficult to obtain “undisturbed” samples. In case of Cohesionless soils, Sensitive clays, etc.  Advantage:  Testing on natural soil under undisturbed conditions  Disadvantage:  Testing conditions are not controlled  Time dependent phenomenon are difficult to control due to large scale  Measurements/instrumentation is tricky and rather a difficult task  In-situ shear strength tests  Standard Penetration Test (SPT)  Cone Penetration Test (CPT)  Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT)  Vane Shear Test (VST)  Dilatometer Test (DMT)  Pressure meter Test (PMT)  Settlement test  Plate Load Test Field Test (In-situ Test)
  • 3. 3 5 Common In Situ Testing Devices In bore holes DMTVST SPT CPT PMT DCPT 6 Standard Penetration Test IS: 2131-1981
  • 4. 4 7 Standard Penetration Test  Components  Drilling Equipment  Inner diameter of hole  100 to 150 mm  Casing may be used in case of soft/non-cohesive soils  Split spoon sampler  IS:9640-1980  Drive weight assembly  Falling Weight = 63.5 Kg  Fall height = 75 cm  Others  Lifting bail, Tongs, ropes, screw jack, etc.  Procedure  The bore hole is advanced to desired depth and bottom is cleaned.  Split spoon sampler is attached to a drill rod and rested on bore hole bottom.  Driving mass is dropped onto the drill rod repeatedly and the sampler is driven into soil for a distance of 450 mm. The number of blow for each 150 mm penetration are recorded.  Procedure (Cont….)  N-value  First 150 mm penetration is considered as seating penetration  The number of blows for the last two 150 mm penetration are added together and reported as N-value for the depth of bore hole.  The split spoon sampler is recovered, and sample is collected from split barrel so as to preserve moisture content and sent to the laboratory for further analysis.  SPT is repeated at every 750 mm or 1500 mm interval for larger depths.  Under the following conditions the penetration is referred to as refusal and test is halted a) 50 blows are required for any 150 mm penetration b)100 blows are required for last 300 mm penetration c) 10 successive blows produce no advancement Standard Penetration Test
  • 5. 5 Precautions during SPT  The ht. of free fall Must be 750 mm  The fall of hammer must be free, frictionless and vertical  Cutting shoe of the sampler must be free from wear & tear  The bottom of the bore hole must be cleaned to collect undisturbed sample  When SPT is done in a sandy soil below water table , the water level in the bore hole MUST be maintained higher than the ground water level. Otherwise: QUICK condition!! Very Low N value Correction for Overburden Pressure : N' = Corrected value of observed N CN = Correction factor for overburden pressure ' .NN C N Peck, Hanson and Thornburn (1974) p' = Effective overburden pressure at a depth corresponding to N-value measurement SPT Corrections
  • 6. 6 SPT Corrections Correction for Dilatancy : [ ] Correction for Overburden Pressure : (Alternative) Alternative - If the stratum consists of fine sand and silt below water table, for N' > 15, the dilatancy correction is applied as SPT Hammer Energy Correction  Energy is dissipated in some fraction during the impact, and the output energy is usually in the range of 50% to 80% of energy input.  For rope pully system with safety hammer  The N-value is standardized for 60 % energy output. For other hammers, the N-value may be corrected in ratio of their energy input  Although IS 2131-1981 is silent on this issue, the correction may be applied as per the requirement of the project. 60%out in E E    60 % . 60 out inE E N N
  • 7. 7 SPT Test Data No. of blows per 0.30m Data from different bore holes Interpretation from SPT: Cohesionless Soils N'' f' Dr (%) consistency 0-4 25-30 0-15 very loose 4-10 27-32 15-35 loose 10-30 30-35 35-65 medium 30-50 35-40 65-85 dense >50 38-43 85-100 very dense
  • 8. 8 0.689 0.193 ' N OCR p        MN/m2 Interpretation from SPT: Cohesive Soils N cu (kPa) consistency visual identification 0-2 0 - 12 very soft Thumb can penetrate > 25 mm 2-4 12-25 soft Thumb can penetrate 25 mm 4-8 25-50 medium Thumb penetrates with moderate effort 8-15 50-100 stiff Thumb will indent 8 mm 15-30 100-200 very stiff Can indent with thumb nail; not thumb >30 >200 hard Cannot indent even with thumb nail not corrected for overburden 6.25. in kPauc N Mayne and Kemper (1988) Cone Penetration Test (CPT) IS: 4968 (Part –III)
  • 9. 9 17 CPT Procedure  Push the sounding rod with cone into the ground for some specified depth. Then push the cone with friction sleeve for another specified depth (> 35 mm). Repeat the process with/without friction sleeve.  Pushing rate = 1 cm/s  Mantle tube is push simultaneously such that it is always above the cone and friction sleeve.  Tip Load, Qc = Load from pressure gauge reading + Wt. of cone + Wt. of connecting sounding rods  Tip resistance   With friction sleeve  add its self weight as well  Qt = Qc + Qf  Frictional resistance   Friction Ratio  c c c Q q A  x-sectional area off cone = 10 cm2 surface area of friction sleeve t c f f Q Q q A   f r c q f q  Typical range  0% 10% Cohesive Granular CPT Results & Soil Classification
  • 10. 10 Typical CPT Data 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 CPT Cone Resistance, qc1 (MPa) Mean Mean-SD Mean+SD 0 10 20 30 SPT Blow Count, N1(60) (Blows/300 mm) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Relative Density, Dr (%) From CPT From SPT Interpreted Soil Profile 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DepthBelowExcavatedSurface(m) Interbedded Fine Sand and Silty Sand (SP-SM) Fine Silty Sand (SM) Gray Silty Clay (CL) Sand (SP) Fine Sand w/ Shells (SP)
  • 11. 11 InterpretedSoilProfile EQDrainTest Area1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Depth(m) Sand Siltysand/sand Silt andSandy Silt Sandto SiltySand ConeTip Resistance, q c (MPa) 0 2 4 6 8 1012 FrictonRatio, F r (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Relative Density, D r 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 PorePressure, u (kPa) -100 0 100 200 CPT Profile for Piezocone CPT Versus SPT  CPT: Advantages over SPT  provides much better resolution, reliability  versatility; pore water pressure, dynamic soil properties  CPT: Disadvantages  Does not give a sample  Will not work with soil with gravel  Need to mobilize a special rig
  • 12. 12 Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT)  Components: 1) Cone (dia = 50 mm) ~usually made of steel IS: 4968 (Part – I, II) SPT DCPT Hollow (split spoon) Solid (no samples) 2) Driving rods/drill rods ~marked at every 100 mm DCPT Procedure  Cone – drill rod – driving head assembly is installed vertically on the ground and hammer is dropped from standard height repeatedly  The blow counts are recorded for every 100 mm penetration. A sum of three consecutive values i.e. 300 mm is noted as the dynamic cone resistance, Ncd at that depth.  The cone is driven up to refusal or the project specified depth.  In the end, the drill rod is withdrawn. The cone is left in the ground if unthreaded or recovered if threaded.  No sample recovered  Fast testing – less project cost / cover large area in due time  Use of bentonite slurry is optional, which is used to reduce friction on the driving rods. • Modified cone is used in this case: diameter = 62.5 mm
  • 13. 13  For clays, and mainly for soft clays.  Measure torque required to quickly shear the vane pushed into soft clay. torque  undrained shear strength cu  Typical d = 20-100 mm. 25 Vane Shear Test (VST) vane  undrained bore hole soft clay measuring (torque) head vane h2d d Vane Shear Test Test in Progress Failure surface 2 2. . . . 1 3. u T c D H D H       3 0.273u T c D  Interpretation: Undrained shear strength - For H = 2.D
  • 14. 14 27 60 mm dia. Flexible membrane  Insert DMT using SPT drilling equipment to the desired depth and pressure the cell  Measure pressure when the membrane is flushed with plate and when it enters ground by 1.1 mm.  Decrease the pressure & measure the pressure when membrane is again flushed with plate.  Determined:  Elastic Modulus  Soil Type and state Dilatometer Test (DMT) Pressure meter Test (PMT) Determined: Elastic Young Mod, E Shear Mod, G Undrained shear strength, Su
  • 15. 15 29 Pressure meter Test (PMT) Measurements: 1. Fluid Pressure 2. Fluid volume change Plate Load Test This test is used to estimate the Elastic Modulus and Bearing Capacity of soils which are not easily sampled. Bearing Capacity Estimation: The load is applied such that the rate of penetration remains constant. A load-settlement curve is produced. Equations have been developed to obtain undrained shear strength from ultimate bearing capacity. Modulus Estimation: The load is applied to the plate in increments of one fifth of the design load. Time-settlement and load-settlement curves are then produced to estimate modulus of soil from the test results.
  • 16. 16 ROCK TESTING Rock Testing  Unconfined Compression Test  Brazilian Test  Point Load Test  Direct Shear Test  Slake Durability Test  Schmidt Rebound Hardness Test  Sound Velocity Test  In-situ stress measurements in rocks
  • 17. 17 Core cutting & grinding machine: Cutting and grinding cylindrical rock specimens core size: EX to NX Polishing & Lapping machine Core drilling machine: Rock core preparation For regular and irregular Samples. core size: EX to 100mm Specimen Preparation Equipments for Rock Testing Rock Core sizes: EX = 21.46 mm AX = 30.10 mm BX = 42.04 mm NX = 54.74 mm More: 35mm, 50mm, 75mm, 100 mm Rock Samples Granite: High stiffness High strength Very brittle Limestone: Medium stiffness Medium strength Medium brittleness Shale: Low stiffness Low strength Ductile
  • 18. 18 Unconfined Compression Test  This test is performed to obtain the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of intact rock cores (slenderness ratio = 2).  UCS is the maximum stress that that rock specimen can sustain.  Rock specimen is kept in a loading frame, and if required heated to the desired test temperature.  Axial load is continuously increased on the specimen until peak load and failure are obtained. Brazilian test: Tensile strength of Rock  Brazilian test is performed to obtain the tensile strength of rock mass.  Tensile strength of rock is imp to know for drilling, blasting of rocks, failure of roof and floor of tunnels, chambers & underground roadways; often weak rocks fail in tension exhibiting splitting mode of failure.  In this test, a disc/cylinder is subjected to a line load, and fracture should initiate at the centre and progress towards periphery. If opposite, the test is discarded as considered that it did not fail in tension.
  • 19. 19 Point Load Test: compress. strength of irregular rock sp.  When regular cores could not be obtained; only irregular pieces are available from the rock excavation, Point load test is performed to obtain the compressive strength of rock mass.  The roughly chiseled spherical mass with dia. ranging between 30-50 mm is tested between two hard conical tips in a rigid frame. Direct Shear Test: Normal stress versus Shear stress response of rock mass  It measures peak and residual direct shear strength as a function of stress normal to the sheared plane.  It can be used for testing for both: core & lump specimens. Shear box size: 300mm x 300mm x 100mm
  • 20. 20 Triaxial Shear Test: shear strength parameters (c, f) of rock mass  Triaxial cells for testing rocks are designed to withstand a confining pressure 150 Kg/cm2.  Mostly triaxial tests on rock specimens are performed under no volume change conditions.  Stress-strain curve is obtained using deviator stress and axial strain. The modulus and failure deviator stress are estimated. Shear strength parameters (c & f ) are calculated adopting similar methods as in soils  If the strain gauges are attached to measure the lateral strain, poisson’s ratio (n) also can be obtained. Slake Durability Test: Resistance of rock mass to disintegration during wetting-drying  Rock fragments of known weight placed in rotating drum apparatus, and rock pieces (approx 10 pieces, each 40-60gm weight) are circulated through wet and dry cycles.  Re-weigh the rock fragments to determine the slake durability index (SDI).  Mostly, this test allows the rock mass to get exposed up to two cycles of wetting and drying.
  • 21. 21 Schmidt Test: Hardness of rock  Schmidt test is performed to determine the rebound hardness of rock.  The plunger of the hammer is pressed against the specimen and the height of rebound of the plunger on a scale is taken as the measure of hardness. Sound Velocity Test: P & S-wave velocity of rocks  It is non-destructive test and performed to determine the velocity of elastic wave propagation through rock in the laboratory.  slenderness ratio used for the test is usually 3. Test can be conducted on dry, moist or saturated specimens.  A transmitter and a receiver are attached at sides of rock specimen (a thin layer of grease is applied on the specimen’s ends to have proper contact with transducers).  The energy transmission between the transducers (transmitter and receiver) is used to determine the velocities of P and S wave.
  • 22. 22 In-situ stress measurements in rocks In-situ stress measurements in rocks: Testing methods on Field
  • 23. 23 In-situ stress measurements in rocks: Flat Jack Test In-situ stress measurements in rocks: Hydrofracturing Test