Objectives: This research work is to examine the partial replacement of cement in concrete mistreatment rice husk ash. It involved the study of strength properties of the concrete with totally different proportions of rice husk ash as partial replacement in cement. Methods: The major problem sweet-faced by the globe nowadays is that the environmental pollution. In the industry, mainly the production of cement can cause the emission of pollutants that includes a nice impact on atmosphere. This can be reduced by the magnified usage of business by-products within the industry. Findings: In this present study, to produce the concrete, Portland cement is partially substituted with Rice husk ash. Different ratios of partial replacement is done like 1/3, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% is taken to prepare completely different mixes. The concrete specimens are tested for their compressive strength, split tensile strength take a look at and flexural strength test at the age of seven and twenty eight days.
2. A Report on Partial Substitute of Cement in Concrete using Rice Husk Ash
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 713 editor@iaeme.com
effects on concrete behaviour made from partial replacement of cement in different ratios with Rice
Husk Ash at totally different proportions.
2. MATERIALS USED
2.1. CEMENT
Cement used in this experimental work is of 53 grade of standard Portland cement (OPC) orthodox to
IS: 12269 (Part1)-1987. It was made by heating stone and clay or different appropriate raw materials
along. This material is rich in metallic element sulphate
2.2. RICE HUSK ASH
Locally available river sand satisfying requirement of IS: 383-1980Specific gravity is 2.58
2.3. COARSE AGGREGATE
Crushed angular stones of 20mm size are used as a coarse aggregate whose specific gravity is 2.86
2.4. FINE AGGREGATE
The fine aggregate was used for making concrete is river sand and it must be clean and should not
contain any alkali.
2.5. WATER
Water is an important ingredient for concrete. Normal Tap water was used.
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1. MIX DESIGN FOR CONCRETE
The mix design was done from recommended IS: 10262-1982. The concrete mix proportion was
1:1.35:2.82 by weight. Six mix proportions were done using several percentages of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and
25 RHA.
3.2. CASTING
A total of 36 specimens of size 150mm*150mm*150mm are casted and left for 24 hours.
3.3. CURING
In this process concrete cube it extracted for the mould after 24 from casting and treated with water for
a period of 7 to 28 days.
3.4. TEST PROCEDURE
The concrete is casted in 36 cube moulds of size 150 mm x150mm×150mm, 36 beam moulds of size
100mmX100mmX500 mm and 36 cylindrical moulds of 300 mm height and 150 mm dia. After 24
hours the specimens are submerged in water. The compressive test is done after the completion of
curing period i.e., 7-28 days.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 STRENGTH FOR 7 AND 28 DAYS
The tests for compression strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength are conducted as per
Indian codal provisions. The readings are taken as average of 3 trails in every case. The results square
measure taken from experimental investigations are showed in tables and premeditated in graphs as
are represented in [Table 1]
3. Satish Babu B. and Sunder Kumar P.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 714 editor@iaeme.com
Table 1 Strengths for 7 days and 28 days
4.2 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH:
Partial cement replacement by RHA showed in M30 grade concrete, compressive strength
improvement up to replacement of 10% in all ages. Both concrete mixes at 100% rice husk ash attains
three to 100% increase in compressive strength. There is reduction in compressive strength for Rice
husk ash levels of 15 to twenty in each seven and twenty eight days as shown in [Figure 1]
Figure 1 Compressive strength of concrete (N/mm2
)
4.3 SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH:
Partial cement replacement by rice husk ash showed in concrete of grade M30 grade, split tensile
strength improvement up to the replacement of 5% in all ages as shown in [Figure 2]
Compressive strength
(N/mm2
)
Split tensile strength
(N/mm2
)
Flexural strength
(N/mm2
)
7 days 28 days 7 days 28 days 7 days 28 days
0% 31 43.5 1.10 1.97 2.81 3.95
5% 32.5 45 1.14 2.07 3.07 4.25
10% 34 46.5 1.03 1.96 3.2 4.39
15% 29 37.5 0.995 1.93 2.76 3.98
20% 27.5 36 0.721 0.945 2.69 3.93
25% 26 34.5 0.617 0.90 2.52 3.43
0
10
20
30
40
50
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
compressivestrengthinn/mm2
% of cement replacement
7 days
28 days
4. A Report on Partial Substitute of Cement in Concrete using Rice Husk Ash
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 715 editor@iaeme.com
Figure 2 Split tensile strength test (N/mm2
)
4.4 FLEXURAL STRENGTH:
The tests for flexural, compressive strength in concrete were conducted for the trail mix grade with
various percentages with a mean frequency of 5% from 0 to 25%at the selected age i.e.7 and 28days.
With rice husk ash content of 10% there is significant increase in Flexural strength of the Concrete
after the completion of curing period i.e., 7-28 days as shown in [Figure 3]
Figure 3 Flexural strength of concrete (N/mm2
)
5. CONCLUSION
Based on higher than study the subsequent observations ar created on partial cement replacement by
RHA in which many tests performed to ascertain the performance of rice husk ash fulfilling the
conditions of partial cement replacement material may be terminated by the subsequent points:
1. At the initial ages, as replacement level of RHA increases the compressive strength increases, here after
split tensile strength as well as flexural strength also increases simultaneously.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
splittensilestrengthtest
(N/mm2)
% of cement replacement
7 days
28 days
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Flexuralstrengthofconcrete
(N/mm2)
% of cement replacement
7 days
28 days
5. Satish Babu B. and Sunder Kumar P.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 716 editor@iaeme.com
2. The optimum strength is obtained at the level of 10 % of OPC replaced by RHA.
3. Using RHA as replacement of OPC in concrete, the emission of pollutant and greenhouse gases
arereduced up to a maximum extent to a limited level.
4. There was a significant improvement in Compressive strength of the composition mentioned with rice
husk ash content at 10% for the design mix at different ages i.e. 7-28 days.
5. The increase in Flexural strength was in order of 1.85% to 8.88% at the age of 7 and 28 days
6. REFERENCES
[1] Adeyuwi,A.P.,Ola and B.F,Application in water works sludge as partial replacement for cement in
concrete productivity,Science Focus Journal,10(1);pp:123-130.
[2] Pierre-ClaudesAitcin, “The durability properties of high performance concrete”, in Cement &
Concrete content, Vol. 25, 2003, IJERST 409-420.
[3] de Sensaleand Gemma Rodriguez, “Strength and durability development of concrete with rice-husk
ash”, Cement & Concrete Composite, Vol. 28, 2006, Part IV 158-160
[4] Gunduz,L and I.Ugur(2004),The effects of different fine and coarse pumice aggregate/cement ratios
on the structural Concrete properties without using any admixtures, Cement
ConcreteRes,35;pp:1859-1864.
[5] An Article journal by Fayyadh, M.M.andHabeeb, G.A.(2009). A report on Saw dust ash Concrete:
and The Effect of SDA normal and effective Particle Size Mechanical Properties, physical
properties and Drying Shrinkage. Australian international Journal of Basic engineering and Applied
Sciences, 3(3):1616-1622.
[6] Lee,S.T.,Moon,H.Y. and Swamy,R.N.(2005),Sulphate Attack and Role of Silica Fume in Resisting
Strength Loss;Cementan Concrete Composites,Vol 27;pp:65-76
[7] Abdullah Anwar, Sabih Ahmad, Yusuf Jamal and M.Z. Khan, Assessment of Liquefaction Potential
of Soil Using Multi-Linear Regression Modeling, International Journal of Civil Engineering
andTechnology, 7(1), 2016, pp. 373-415.
[8] Akpila, S. B. and Omunguye, I. W.Derivative of Stress Strain, Deviatoric Stress and Undrained
Cohesion Models Based on Soil Modulus of Cohesive Soils. International Journal of Civil
Engineering and Technology,6(7), 2015, pp 34-43.
[9] John Paul V. and Antony Rachel Sneha M., Effect of Random Inclusion of Bamboo Fibers on
Strength Behaviour of Flyash Treated Black Cotton Soil. International Journal of Civil Engineering
and Technology, 7(5), 2016, pp.153–160.