SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 73
STATISTICAL QUALITY
CONTROL
Prepared By –
Ms. H.N.DAVE
Lecturer (Mechanical Engg. Dept.)
R.C. Technical Institute, Ahmedabad
HINIDAVE2005@gmail.com
CHAPTER 4
• STATITICS IS RELATED TO
THE USE OF STATISTICS
• CLASSIFICATION,
SUMMARIZING AND
PRESENTATION OF
QUANTITATIVE DATA
STATISTICS
• QUALITY REFERS TO THE
DISTINCTIVE PROPERTY
OF PRODUCT TO DELIGHT
THE CUSTOMER
QUALITY • FINDING VARIATIONS BY
COMPARING WITH THE
STANDARDS AND TAKING
CORRECTIVE ACTION
CONTROL
THE CONTROL OF QUALITY WITH THE HELP OF
STATISTICAL PRINCIPLES IS KNOWN AS STATISTICAL
QUALITY CONTROL
Sources of Variation
• Variation exists in all processes.
• Variation can be categorized as either;
– Common or Random causes of variation, or
• Random causes that we cannot identify Unavoidable
• e.g. slight differences in process variables like diameter,
weight, service time, temperature
-Assignable causes of variation
• Causes can be identified and eliminated
• e.g. poor employee training, worn tool, machine needing
repair
Variation
• A process that is operating with
only chance causes of variation
present is said to be in statistical
control.
• A process that is operating in the
presence of assignable causes is
said to be out of control.
• The eventual goal of SPC is the
elimination of variability in the
process.
ATTRIBUTE VS VARIABLE
LOGO
ATTRIBUTE VS VARIABLE
Attribute Variable
Used for product characteristics
that can be evaluated with a
discrete response (pass/fail,
yes/no, good/bad, number
defective)
Used when the quality
characteristic can be measured
and expressed in numbers
less costly when it comes to
collecting data
must be able to measure the
quality characteristics in numbers
can plot multiple characteristics on
one chart
may be impractical and
uneconomical
loss of information vs variable
chart
LOGO
ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES
Advantages Disadvantages
Some quality characteristics can only
be viewed as a attribute
Attributes don’t measure the
degree to which specifications are
met or not met
Quality characteristic may be
measurable as a variable but an
attribute is used for time, cost or
convenience
Doesn’t provide much information
on cause
Combination of variables can be
measured as an attribute rather than
use a multivariate chart
Variable chart can indicate
potential changes which allow
preventive actions
loss of information vs variable
chart
Larger sample size required
COMMON CAUSE ATTRIBUTES SPECIAL CAUSE ATTRIBUTES
Wikipedia gives the following 16 item list
for common cause variability:
1. Inappropriate procedures
2. Incompetent employees
3. Insufficient training
4. Poor design
5. Poor maintenance of machines
6. Lack of clearly defined standing
operating procedures (SOPs)
7. Poor working conditions, e.g. lighting,
noise, dirt, temperature, ventilation
8. Machines not suited to the job
9. Substandard raw materials
10. Assurement Error
11. Quality control error
12. Vibration in industrial processes
13. Ambient temperature and humidity
14. Normal wear and tear
15. Variability in settings
16. Computer response time
Wikipedia gives the following 11 item list
for special cause variability:
1. Poor adjustment of equipment
2. Operator falls asleep
3. Faulty controllers
4. Machine malfunction
5. Computer crashes
6. Poor batch of raw material
7. Power surges
8. High healthcare demand from elderly
people
9. Abnormal traffic (click-fraud) on web
ads
10. Extremely long lab testing turnover
time due to switching to a new
computer system
11. Operator absent
Types of control charts
• Variables Control Charts
– These charts are applied to data that
follow a continuous distribution.
• Attributes Control Charts
– These charts are applied to data that
follow a discrete distribution.
SQC Chartsprovides
 Developed by Dr Walter A. Shewhart of Bell Laboratories from 1924
 Graphical and visual plot of changes in the data over time ; This is
necessary
for visual management of your process.
 Charts have a Central Line and ControlLimits to detect Special
Cause variation.
 Usually, its sample statistic is plotted over time. Sometimes, the
actual value
of the quality characteristic is plotted.
LCL & UCL are
vital guidelines
for deciding
when action
should be
taken in a
process
Each point is usually a
sample statistic (such as
subgroup average) of
the quality
characteristic
Center Line
represents mean
operating level of
process
Control ChartAnatomy
Special Cause
Variation
Process is “Out
of Control”
Special Cause
Variation
Process is “Out
of Control”
Run Chart of
data points
Process Sequence/Time Scale
Mean
+/-
3
sigma
Upper Control
Limit
Common Cause
Variation
Process is “In
Control”
Lower Control
Limit
Control and Out ofControl
10
Outlier
Outlier
99.7%
3
2
1
95%
68%
-1
-2
-3
INTERPRETINGCONTROL
CHART
11
TYPES OF CONTROLCHART
17
 There are two main categories of Control Charts, those
that display attribute data, and those that display
variables data.
 Attribute Data: This category of Control Chart displays
data that result from counting the number of occurrences
or items in a single category of similar items or
occurrences. These “count” data may be expressed as
pass/fail, yes/no, or presence/absence of a defect.
 Variables Data: This category of Control Chart displays
values resulting from the measurement of a continuous
variable. Examples of variables data are elapsed time,
temperature, and radiation dose.
TYPES& SELECTIONOFCONTROLCHART
18
What type of
data do I
have?
Variable Attribute
Counting
defects or
defectives?
X-bar & S
Chart
I & MR
Chart
X-bar & R
Chart
n > 10 1 < n <
10
n = 1
Defective
s
Defect
s
What
subgroup size
is available?
Constant
Sample Size?
Constant
Opportunity?
yes yes
no no
np Chart u Chart
p Chart c Chart
Note: A defective unit can
have more than one defect.
PROCEDURE TO PLOT X – R CHART
1. Draw random samples each of 3,4 or 5 items, Sufficient
numbers of samples around 20 to 25 shoudl be taken over period
so that all possible variations are
included for determination of process average. Measure the
critical variable x.
2. Tabulate the data collected and find i.e. mean and R,i.e. range
difference between
maximum and minimum value of x.
3. Determine average of and R.
6. Plot the charts taking control limits and mean on Y-
axis and nos of samples on X- axis.
7. Plot R Chart as below
Find the range R by substituting maximum and minimum values of x.
Determine average of Range as R Determine control limits as under.
9. Make the points by taking and R for each sample and join then by
straight line.
10. Standard deviation can be determined as
X-bar and R or S Control Charts
Control Chart (from ):
R
Chart:
x R
32
Example 5.1
During production of carbon steel pins on an automatic lathe machine, eleven
samples each of 4- pins were randomly taken and inspection was carried out. The
lengths of pin were measured during inspection. Construct x - R chart and
establish control limits. The inspection data are given as under.
EXAMPLE 3 :
For sample size of 5, A2 = 0.577, D4 =2.114, D3 = 0. Construct - R chart and
determine control limits of range R.
CONTROL CHARTS FOR ATTRIBUTES
LOGO
DEFECT VS DEFECTIVES
‘Defect’ – a single nonconforming
quality characteristic.
‘Defective’ – items having one or
more defects.
LOGO
p, np - Chart
p and np charts deal with nonconforming
P is fraction nonconforming
np is total nonconforming
C h a r t s based on Binomial distribution.
S a m p l e size must be large enough (example p
=
2
%
)
Definition of anonconformity.
Probability the same from item toitem.
DEFECT VS DEFECTIVES
LOGO
c, u - Charts
c and u charts deal with nonconformities.
c Chart – total number of nonconformities
u Chart – nonconformities per unit
C h a r t s based on Poisson distribution.
S a m p l e size, constant probabilities.
DEFECT VS DEFECTIVES
LOGO
CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE
The following procedure is used to construct all type of
attribute charts
Step 1
Preliminary samples are taken and inspected
Step 2
When the process achieves the control state, the required
quality characteristics is measured and recorded in the
prescribed data sheet
Step 3
Trial control limits are calculated using appropriate
formulae. Each chart is suitable for different applications
LOGO
CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE
Step 4
Step 5
Draw the control limits for computed values
Draw the control chart
Let X – axis Be the sample number
Let Y – axis Be the fraction defectives for the p–charts
Be the number of defectives for the np–charts
Be the number of non-conformities for the c–chart
Be the number of non-conformities per unit for the u – chart
UCL (Dotted line)
Centre Line, CL (Continuous line)
LCL (Dotted line)
LOGO
CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE
Step 6
Plot all the measured points (i.e.,past data) on the
appropriate charts. Connect successive points by straight
line segments.
Step 7
If all the points fall within the trial control limits, accept the
trial control limits for present and future references.
Step 8
If there is no systematic behaviour (i.e.,it implies random
pattern), it shown that the process was in control in the
past, therefore, the trial control limits are suitable for
controlling current and future production.
LOGO
CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE
Revised control limits:
Step 9
If one or more points fall outside the control limits, try to find
the causes and eliminate these points to the calculation of
the revised control limits.
Step 10
Draw the revised control limits on the previously draw chart
itself.
LOGO
CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE
Step 11
If the points other than the eliminated points fall within the
revised control limits, accept the revised control limits for
present and future use.
Step 12
If one or more points other than the removed points fall
outside the revised control limits, repeat the process as
before.
LOGO
CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE
TYPES OF ATTRIBUTE CHARTS ARE :
TYPE
p – chart chart for fraction rejected
np – chart chart for number of defective
c – chart chart for non-conformities
u - chart chart for non-conformities per unit
LOGO
P CHART FORMULA
n
p
p(1 p)
UCL  p 3
n
p
p(1 p)
LCL  p  3
Totalnumberinspected
 p 
Total numberof defectives
p
CentreLine,CL
The centre line and upper and lower control limits for the P
charts are :
LOGO
P CHART EXAMPLE
Day No. of defectives
1 4
2 0
3 3
4 2
5 3
6 5
7 1
8 2
9 2
10 0
Problem : (constant sample size)
The following table gives the result of inspection of 50 items per
day for 20 days. Construct the fraction defectives or percent
defectives chart and give inference about the process.
Day No. of defectives
11 3
12 4
13 2
14 5
15 1
16 0
17 4
18 4
19 5
20 2
LOGO
P CHART EXAMPLE
1000
Solution : (constant sample size)
Centre Line,CLp  p 
Total number of defectives
 52  0.052
Total number inspected
50
0.052(10.052)
n
p
UCL  p  3
p(1 p)
 0.052  3
 0.052 0.0942  0.1462
50
0.052(10.052)
n
p
LCL  p  3
p(1 p)
 0.052  3
 0.052 0.0942  0.0422  0
LOGO
P CHART EXAMPLE
Inference :
•All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the
random pattern.
•The process is in control.
•This limits can be used for future references.
LOGO
P CHART EXAMPLE
Problem : (variable sample size)
Construct the fraction defectives or percent defectives chart
and give inference about the process.
Day Sample
size
No. of
defectives
1 200 4
2 200 2
3 300 4
4 300 5
5 300 3
6 300 3
7 250 1
8 250 2
9 250 2
10 250 4
Day Sample
size
No. of
defectives
11 250 2
12 250 5
13 250 4
14 250 5
15 250 2
16 200 0
17 200 1
18 200 3
19 200 1
20 200 3
LOGO
Samples n number of defective p UCL CL LCL
1 200 4 0.020 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644
2 200 2 0.010 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644
3 300 4 0.013 0.067 0.0115 -0.04397
4 300 5 0.017 0.067 0.0115 -0.04397
5 300 3 0.010 0.067 0.0115 -0.04397
6 300 3 0.010 0.067 0.0115 -0.04397
7 250 1 0.004 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
8 250 2 0.008 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
9 250 2 0.008 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
10 250 4 0.016 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
11 250 2 0.008 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
12 250 5 0.020 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
13 250 4 0.016 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
14 250 5 0.020 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
15 250 2 0.008 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926
16 200 0 0.000 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644
17 200 1 0.005 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644
18 200 3 0.015 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644
19 200 1 0.005 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644
20 200 3 0.015 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644
Total 4850 56 0.228
P CHART EXAMPLE
Solution : (variable sample size)
LOGO
P CHART EXAMPLE
Inference :
•All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the
random pattern.
•The process is in control.
•This limits can be used for future references.
LOGO
np CHART FORMULA
np(1 p)
UCLnp  np 3
np(1 p)
LCLnp  np  3
Number ofsamples
 np 
Total numberof defectives
np
CentreLine,CL
The centre line and upper and lower control limits for the np
charts are :
LOGO
np CHART EXAMPLE
Problem :
The following table
gives the result of
inspection of 100 items
per day for 25 days.
Construct the fraction
defectives or percent
defectives chart and
give inference about
the process.
Sample n Number of defective
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
2
0
3
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
0
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
100
100
100
100
0
1
0
1
LOGO
np CHART EXAMPLE
25
Solution :
Centre Line,CLnp  np 
Total number of defectives
 25  1 . 0
No.ofsamples
1.0(10.01)
np(1 p)  1 .0  3
UCLnp  np  3
 1 .0  2.985  3.985
1.0(10.01)
np(1 p)  1 .0  3
LCLnp  np  3
 1 .0 2.985  1.985  0
 0.01
25
2500
p 
Total number of defectives

Total number inspected
LOGO
np CHART EXAMPLE
Inference :
•All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the
random pattern.
•The process is in control.
•This limits can be used for future references.
LOGO
C CHART FORMULA
The centre line and upper and lower control limits for the c
charts are :
UCLc  c  3 c
LCLc  c  3 c
Number ofsamples
 c 
Total number of defects
CLc
LOGO
C CHART EXAMPLE
Problem :
In a copper foil laminations process
for every 500 feet of foil laminated,
one square foot of the laminated
copper foil is examned for visual
defect such as unever lamination,
scrath, etc. The data collected are
shown in the table below. Calculate
the control limit and plot the c-chart.
Time Number of Defect
5
3
2
6
6
7
3
3
6
7
7
9
7
5
3
12
6
10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
100
200
7
2
6
8
0
7
4
3
LOGO
np CHART EXAMPLE
Solution :
26
No.ofsamples
Centre Line,CLc  c 
Total number of defects
 144  5.54
UCLc  c  3 c  5.54  3 5.54
 5.54  7 .0 6 12.60
LCLc  c  3 c  5.54  3 5.54
 5.54 7.06  1.52  0
LOGO
C CHART EXAMPLE
Inference :
•All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the
random pattern.
•The process is in control.
•This limits can be used for future references.
LOGO
U CHART FORMULA
n
u
u
UCL  u 3
n
u
u
LCL  u 3
n
u
CentreLine,CL  u 
c
The centre line and upper and lower control limits for the u
charts are :
LOGO
U CHART EXAMPLE
Problem :
A radio manufacturer wishes to
use SQC charts for the detection
of non-conformities per unit on
the final assembly line. The
sample size is finalised as 10
radios. The data collected are
shown in the table. Calculate the
control limit and plot the u-chart.
Sample
number
Number of
non-conformities
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
10
11
15
10
14
13
18
12
19
20
18
14
17
20
22
18
19
20
10
14
12
LOGO
U CHART EXAMPLE
20
Solution :
c 
Total number of defects
 307 15.35
No.ofsamples
10
1.54
u
UCL  u  3
u
1.54  3
n
1.54 1.18  2.72
10
n
Centre Line,CLu  u 
c
 15.35 1.53
10
1.54
n
1.54 1.18  0.36
u
LCL  u  3
u
1.54  3
LOGO
U CHART EXAMPLE
Sample
number
Sample
size
Number of
non-conformities (c)
Number of
non-conformities per unit (u)
1 10 18 1.8
2 10 20 2.0
3 10 10 1.0
4 10 11 1.1
5 10 15 1.5
6 10 10 1.0
7 10 14 1.4
8 10 13 1.3
9 10 18 1.8
10 10 12 1.2
11 10 19 1.9
12 10 20 2.0
13 10 18 1.8
14 10 14 1.4
15 10 17 1.7
16 10 20 2.0
17 10 22 2.2
18 10 10 1.0
19 10 14 1.4
20 10 12 1.2
LOGO
U CHART EXAMPLE
Inference :
•All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the
random pattern.
•The process is in control.
•This limits can be used for future references.

More Related Content

What's hot

OR PERT CPM AND JOB SCHEDULING
OR PERT CPM AND JOB SCHEDULINGOR PERT CPM AND JOB SCHEDULING
OR PERT CPM AND JOB SCHEDULINGJignesh Kariya
 
Demolition of Structures.
Demolition of Structures.Demolition of Structures.
Demolition of Structures.Chintan Varia
 
Ppt On S.Q.C.
Ppt On S.Q.C.Ppt On S.Q.C.
Ppt On S.Q.C.dvietians
 
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONSUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONVed Jangid
 
Quality Control Chart
 Quality Control Chart Quality Control Chart
Quality Control ChartAshish Gupta
 
DESIGN OF HILL ROADS AND ITS ALIGNMENT.pptx
DESIGN OF HILL ROADS AND ITS ALIGNMENT.pptxDESIGN OF HILL ROADS AND ITS ALIGNMENT.pptx
DESIGN OF HILL ROADS AND ITS ALIGNMENT.pptxSamirsinh Parmar
 
Statistical Process Control
Statistical Process ControlStatistical Process Control
Statistical Process ControlNAVEENBANSHIWAL
 
Acceptance sampling (SQC)
Acceptance sampling (SQC)Acceptance sampling (SQC)
Acceptance sampling (SQC)nilesh sadaphal
 
VALUE ENGINEERING CONCEPT-A BRIEF IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
VALUE ENGINEERING CONCEPT-A BRIEF IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRYVALUE ENGINEERING CONCEPT-A BRIEF IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
VALUE ENGINEERING CONCEPT-A BRIEF IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRYSJMIT,now NMAMIT NITTE
 
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1Cryslyn Tan
 
Waste management on construction sites
Waste management on construction sitesWaste management on construction sites
Waste management on construction sitesAli Hasan
 

What's hot (20)

Acceptance sampling
Acceptance samplingAcceptance sampling
Acceptance sampling
 
OR PERT CPM AND JOB SCHEDULING
OR PERT CPM AND JOB SCHEDULINGOR PERT CPM AND JOB SCHEDULING
OR PERT CPM AND JOB SCHEDULING
 
MRBdoc
MRBdocMRBdoc
MRBdoc
 
Demolition of Structures.
Demolition of Structures.Demolition of Structures.
Demolition of Structures.
 
Ppt On S.Q.C.
Ppt On S.Q.C.Ppt On S.Q.C.
Ppt On S.Q.C.
 
Value Engineering
Value EngineeringValue Engineering
Value Engineering
 
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONSUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
 
X Bar R Charts
X Bar R ChartsX Bar R Charts
X Bar R Charts
 
Control charts for variables
Control charts for variables Control charts for variables
Control charts for variables
 
Demolition of Structure ppt.pptx
Demolition of Structure ppt.pptxDemolition of Structure ppt.pptx
Demolition of Structure ppt.pptx
 
Quality Control Chart
 Quality Control Chart Quality Control Chart
Quality Control Chart
 
DESIGN OF HILL ROADS AND ITS ALIGNMENT.pptx
DESIGN OF HILL ROADS AND ITS ALIGNMENT.pptxDESIGN OF HILL ROADS AND ITS ALIGNMENT.pptx
DESIGN OF HILL ROADS AND ITS ALIGNMENT.pptx
 
Control chart basics
Control chart basicsControl chart basics
Control chart basics
 
Control charts
Control chartsControl charts
Control charts
 
Statistical Process Control
Statistical Process ControlStatistical Process Control
Statistical Process Control
 
Acceptance sampling (SQC)
Acceptance sampling (SQC)Acceptance sampling (SQC)
Acceptance sampling (SQC)
 
VALUE ENGINEERING CONCEPT-A BRIEF IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
VALUE ENGINEERING CONCEPT-A BRIEF IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRYVALUE ENGINEERING CONCEPT-A BRIEF IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
VALUE ENGINEERING CONCEPT-A BRIEF IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
 
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1
 
Waste management on construction sites
Waste management on construction sitesWaste management on construction sites
Waste management on construction sites
 
Msa training
Msa trainingMsa training
Msa training
 

Similar to STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL CHARTS

statistical process control
 statistical process control statistical process control
statistical process controlAnkitaGorhe
 
Stochastic Process
Stochastic ProcessStochastic Process
Stochastic Processknksmart
 
1. (25 points) Temperature, Pressure and yield on a chemical .docx
1. (25 points) Temperature, Pressure and yield on a chemical .docx1. (25 points) Temperature, Pressure and yield on a chemical .docx
1. (25 points) Temperature, Pressure and yield on a chemical .docxaulasnilda
 
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(PPT).pptx
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(PPT).pptxSTATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(PPT).pptx
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(PPT).pptxmayankdubey99
 
Control estadistico de calidad
Control estadistico de calidad Control estadistico de calidad
Control estadistico de calidad ericktc
 
Quality Management & ControlSeung-Kuk Paik, Ph.D.Systems a.docx
Quality Management & ControlSeung-Kuk Paik, Ph.D.Systems a.docxQuality Management & ControlSeung-Kuk Paik, Ph.D.Systems a.docx
Quality Management & ControlSeung-Kuk Paik, Ph.D.Systems a.docxmakdul
 
Spc lecture presentation (bonnie corrror)
Spc lecture presentation (bonnie corrror)Spc lecture presentation (bonnie corrror)
Spc lecture presentation (bonnie corrror)Jitesh Gaurav
 
Hızlı Ozet - Istatistiksel Proses Kontrol
Hızlı Ozet - Istatistiksel Proses KontrolHızlı Ozet - Istatistiksel Proses Kontrol
Hızlı Ozet - Istatistiksel Proses Kontrolmetallicaslayer
 
TUTORIAL _5_Control charts for variables.pptx.pdf
TUTORIAL _5_Control charts for variables.pptx.pdfTUTORIAL _5_Control charts for variables.pptx.pdf
TUTORIAL _5_Control charts for variables.pptx.pdfAzizRahman96
 
Statistical process control ppt @ bec doms
Statistical process control ppt @ bec domsStatistical process control ppt @ bec doms
Statistical process control ppt @ bec domsBabasab Patil
 
A Practical Guide to Selecting the Right Control Chart eBook
A Practical Guide to Selecting the Right Control Chart eBookA Practical Guide to Selecting the Right Control Chart eBook
A Practical Guide to Selecting the Right Control Chart eBookB2B Marketing Source, LLC
 

Similar to STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL CHARTS (20)

Six sigma
Six sigmaSix sigma
Six sigma
 
statistical process control
 statistical process control statistical process control
statistical process control
 
5. spc control charts
5. spc   control charts5. spc   control charts
5. spc control charts
 
Stochastic Process
Stochastic ProcessStochastic Process
Stochastic Process
 
1. (25 points) Temperature, Pressure and yield on a chemical .docx
1. (25 points) Temperature, Pressure and yield on a chemical .docx1. (25 points) Temperature, Pressure and yield on a chemical .docx
1. (25 points) Temperature, Pressure and yield on a chemical .docx
 
Final notes on s1 qc
Final notes on s1 qcFinal notes on s1 qc
Final notes on s1 qc
 
Final notes on s1 qc
Final notes on s1 qcFinal notes on s1 qc
Final notes on s1 qc
 
Qa.spc
Qa.spcQa.spc
Qa.spc
 
Control charts
Control chartsControl charts
Control charts
 
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(PPT).pptx
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(PPT).pptxSTATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(PPT).pptx
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(PPT).pptx
 
Spc
SpcSpc
Spc
 
Control estadistico de calidad
Control estadistico de calidad Control estadistico de calidad
Control estadistico de calidad
 
Quality Management & ControlSeung-Kuk Paik, Ph.D.Systems a.docx
Quality Management & ControlSeung-Kuk Paik, Ph.D.Systems a.docxQuality Management & ControlSeung-Kuk Paik, Ph.D.Systems a.docx
Quality Management & ControlSeung-Kuk Paik, Ph.D.Systems a.docx
 
Spc lecture presentation (bonnie corrror)
Spc lecture presentation (bonnie corrror)Spc lecture presentation (bonnie corrror)
Spc lecture presentation (bonnie corrror)
 
Hızlı Ozet - Istatistiksel Proses Kontrol
Hızlı Ozet - Istatistiksel Proses KontrolHızlı Ozet - Istatistiksel Proses Kontrol
Hızlı Ozet - Istatistiksel Proses Kontrol
 
TUTORIAL _5_Control charts for variables.pptx.pdf
TUTORIAL _5_Control charts for variables.pptx.pdfTUTORIAL _5_Control charts for variables.pptx.pdf
TUTORIAL _5_Control charts for variables.pptx.pdf
 
Statistical process control ppt @ bec doms
Statistical process control ppt @ bec domsStatistical process control ppt @ bec doms
Statistical process control ppt @ bec doms
 
A Practical Guide to Selecting the Right Control Chart eBook
A Practical Guide to Selecting the Right Control Chart eBookA Practical Guide to Selecting the Right Control Chart eBook
A Practical Guide to Selecting the Right Control Chart eBook
 
Control Charts[1]
Control Charts[1]Control Charts[1]
Control Charts[1]
 
Control Charts[1]
Control Charts[1]Control Charts[1]
Control Charts[1]
 

Recently uploaded

Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCLCurrent Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCLDeelipZope
 
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...ranjana rawat
 
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxwendy cai
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...Soham Mondal
 
power system scada applications and uses
power system scada applications and usespower system scada applications and uses
power system scada applications and usesDevarapalliHaritha
 
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSCAESB
 
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIPast, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIabhishek36461
 
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSAPPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSKurinjimalarL3
 
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2RajaP95
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxbritheesh05
 
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxHeart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxPoojaBan
 
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxBiology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxDeepakSakkari2
 
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
Introduction to Microprocesso programming and interfacing.pptx
Introduction to Microprocesso programming and interfacing.pptxIntroduction to Microprocesso programming and interfacing.pptx
Introduction to Microprocesso programming and interfacing.pptxvipinkmenon1
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024hassan khalil
 
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxDecoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxJoão Esperancinha
 
chaitra-1.pptx fake news detection using machine learning
chaitra-1.pptx  fake news detection using machine learningchaitra-1.pptx  fake news detection using machine learning
chaitra-1.pptx fake news detection using machine learningmisbanausheenparvam
 
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionDr.Costas Sachpazis
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCLCurrent Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
Current Transformer Drawing and GTP for MSETCL
 
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
 
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptxWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
What are the advantages and disadvantages of membrane structures.pptx
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
 
power system scada applications and uses
power system scada applications and usespower system scada applications and uses
power system scada applications and uses
 
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentationGDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
GDSC ASEB Gen AI study jams presentation
 
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIPast, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
 
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSAPPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
 
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
HARMONY IN THE HUMAN BEING - Unit-II UHV-2
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
 
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptxHeart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
Heart Disease Prediction using machine learning.pptx
 
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptxBiology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
Biology for Computer Engineers Course Handout.pptx
 
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
 
Introduction to Microprocesso programming and interfacing.pptx
Introduction to Microprocesso programming and interfacing.pptxIntroduction to Microprocesso programming and interfacing.pptx
Introduction to Microprocesso programming and interfacing.pptx
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
 
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Serviceyoung call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
 
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxDecoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
 
chaitra-1.pptx fake news detection using machine learning
chaitra-1.pptx  fake news detection using machine learningchaitra-1.pptx  fake news detection using machine learning
chaitra-1.pptx fake news detection using machine learning
 
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
 

STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL CHARTS

  • 1. STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL Prepared By – Ms. H.N.DAVE Lecturer (Mechanical Engg. Dept.) R.C. Technical Institute, Ahmedabad HINIDAVE2005@gmail.com CHAPTER 4
  • 2.
  • 3. • STATITICS IS RELATED TO THE USE OF STATISTICS • CLASSIFICATION, SUMMARIZING AND PRESENTATION OF QUANTITATIVE DATA STATISTICS • QUALITY REFERS TO THE DISTINCTIVE PROPERTY OF PRODUCT TO DELIGHT THE CUSTOMER QUALITY • FINDING VARIATIONS BY COMPARING WITH THE STANDARDS AND TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION CONTROL THE CONTROL OF QUALITY WITH THE HELP OF STATISTICAL PRINCIPLES IS KNOWN AS STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11. Sources of Variation • Variation exists in all processes. • Variation can be categorized as either; – Common or Random causes of variation, or • Random causes that we cannot identify Unavoidable • e.g. slight differences in process variables like diameter, weight, service time, temperature -Assignable causes of variation • Causes can be identified and eliminated • e.g. poor employee training, worn tool, machine needing repair Variation
  • 12. • A process that is operating with only chance causes of variation present is said to be in statistical control. • A process that is operating in the presence of assignable causes is said to be out of control. • The eventual goal of SPC is the elimination of variability in the process.
  • 14.
  • 15. LOGO ATTRIBUTE VS VARIABLE Attribute Variable Used for product characteristics that can be evaluated with a discrete response (pass/fail, yes/no, good/bad, number defective) Used when the quality characteristic can be measured and expressed in numbers less costly when it comes to collecting data must be able to measure the quality characteristics in numbers can plot multiple characteristics on one chart may be impractical and uneconomical loss of information vs variable chart
  • 16. LOGO ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES Advantages Disadvantages Some quality characteristics can only be viewed as a attribute Attributes don’t measure the degree to which specifications are met or not met Quality characteristic may be measurable as a variable but an attribute is used for time, cost or convenience Doesn’t provide much information on cause Combination of variables can be measured as an attribute rather than use a multivariate chart Variable chart can indicate potential changes which allow preventive actions loss of information vs variable chart Larger sample size required
  • 17. COMMON CAUSE ATTRIBUTES SPECIAL CAUSE ATTRIBUTES Wikipedia gives the following 16 item list for common cause variability: 1. Inappropriate procedures 2. Incompetent employees 3. Insufficient training 4. Poor design 5. Poor maintenance of machines 6. Lack of clearly defined standing operating procedures (SOPs) 7. Poor working conditions, e.g. lighting, noise, dirt, temperature, ventilation 8. Machines not suited to the job 9. Substandard raw materials 10. Assurement Error 11. Quality control error 12. Vibration in industrial processes 13. Ambient temperature and humidity 14. Normal wear and tear 15. Variability in settings 16. Computer response time Wikipedia gives the following 11 item list for special cause variability: 1. Poor adjustment of equipment 2. Operator falls asleep 3. Faulty controllers 4. Machine malfunction 5. Computer crashes 6. Poor batch of raw material 7. Power surges 8. High healthcare demand from elderly people 9. Abnormal traffic (click-fraud) on web ads 10. Extremely long lab testing turnover time due to switching to a new computer system 11. Operator absent
  • 18. Types of control charts • Variables Control Charts – These charts are applied to data that follow a continuous distribution. • Attributes Control Charts – These charts are applied to data that follow a discrete distribution.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21. SQC Chartsprovides  Developed by Dr Walter A. Shewhart of Bell Laboratories from 1924  Graphical and visual plot of changes in the data over time ; This is necessary for visual management of your process.  Charts have a Central Line and ControlLimits to detect Special Cause variation.  Usually, its sample statistic is plotted over time. Sometimes, the actual value of the quality characteristic is plotted. LCL & UCL are vital guidelines for deciding when action should be taken in a process Each point is usually a sample statistic (such as subgroup average) of the quality characteristic Center Line represents mean operating level of process
  • 22. Control ChartAnatomy Special Cause Variation Process is “Out of Control” Special Cause Variation Process is “Out of Control” Run Chart of data points Process Sequence/Time Scale Mean +/- 3 sigma Upper Control Limit Common Cause Variation Process is “In Control” Lower Control Limit
  • 23. Control and Out ofControl 10 Outlier Outlier 99.7% 3 2 1 95% 68% -1 -2 -3
  • 25. TYPES OF CONTROLCHART 17  There are two main categories of Control Charts, those that display attribute data, and those that display variables data.  Attribute Data: This category of Control Chart displays data that result from counting the number of occurrences or items in a single category of similar items or occurrences. These “count” data may be expressed as pass/fail, yes/no, or presence/absence of a defect.  Variables Data: This category of Control Chart displays values resulting from the measurement of a continuous variable. Examples of variables data are elapsed time, temperature, and radiation dose.
  • 26. TYPES& SELECTIONOFCONTROLCHART 18 What type of data do I have? Variable Attribute Counting defects or defectives? X-bar & S Chart I & MR Chart X-bar & R Chart n > 10 1 < n < 10 n = 1 Defective s Defect s What subgroup size is available? Constant Sample Size? Constant Opportunity? yes yes no no np Chart u Chart p Chart c Chart Note: A defective unit can have more than one defect.
  • 27. PROCEDURE TO PLOT X – R CHART 1. Draw random samples each of 3,4 or 5 items, Sufficient numbers of samples around 20 to 25 shoudl be taken over period so that all possible variations are included for determination of process average. Measure the critical variable x. 2. Tabulate the data collected and find i.e. mean and R,i.e. range difference between maximum and minimum value of x. 3. Determine average of and R.
  • 28. 6. Plot the charts taking control limits and mean on Y- axis and nos of samples on X- axis.
  • 29.
  • 30. 7. Plot R Chart as below Find the range R by substituting maximum and minimum values of x. Determine average of Range as R Determine control limits as under.
  • 31. 9. Make the points by taking and R for each sample and join then by straight line. 10. Standard deviation can be determined as
  • 32. X-bar and R or S Control Charts Control Chart (from ): R Chart: x R 32
  • 33.
  • 34. Example 5.1 During production of carbon steel pins on an automatic lathe machine, eleven samples each of 4- pins were randomly taken and inspection was carried out. The lengths of pin were measured during inspection. Construct x - R chart and establish control limits. The inspection data are given as under.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40. EXAMPLE 3 : For sample size of 5, A2 = 0.577, D4 =2.114, D3 = 0. Construct - R chart and determine control limits of range R.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44. CONTROL CHARTS FOR ATTRIBUTES
  • 45. LOGO DEFECT VS DEFECTIVES ‘Defect’ – a single nonconforming quality characteristic. ‘Defective’ – items having one or more defects.
  • 46. LOGO p, np - Chart p and np charts deal with nonconforming P is fraction nonconforming np is total nonconforming C h a r t s based on Binomial distribution. S a m p l e size must be large enough (example p = 2 % ) Definition of anonconformity. Probability the same from item toitem. DEFECT VS DEFECTIVES
  • 47. LOGO c, u - Charts c and u charts deal with nonconformities. c Chart – total number of nonconformities u Chart – nonconformities per unit C h a r t s based on Poisson distribution. S a m p l e size, constant probabilities. DEFECT VS DEFECTIVES
  • 48. LOGO CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE The following procedure is used to construct all type of attribute charts Step 1 Preliminary samples are taken and inspected Step 2 When the process achieves the control state, the required quality characteristics is measured and recorded in the prescribed data sheet Step 3 Trial control limits are calculated using appropriate formulae. Each chart is suitable for different applications
  • 49. LOGO CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE Step 4 Step 5 Draw the control limits for computed values Draw the control chart Let X – axis Be the sample number Let Y – axis Be the fraction defectives for the p–charts Be the number of defectives for the np–charts Be the number of non-conformities for the c–chart Be the number of non-conformities per unit for the u – chart UCL (Dotted line) Centre Line, CL (Continuous line) LCL (Dotted line)
  • 50. LOGO CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE Step 6 Plot all the measured points (i.e.,past data) on the appropriate charts. Connect successive points by straight line segments. Step 7 If all the points fall within the trial control limits, accept the trial control limits for present and future references. Step 8 If there is no systematic behaviour (i.e.,it implies random pattern), it shown that the process was in control in the past, therefore, the trial control limits are suitable for controlling current and future production.
  • 51. LOGO CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE Revised control limits: Step 9 If one or more points fall outside the control limits, try to find the causes and eliminate these points to the calculation of the revised control limits. Step 10 Draw the revised control limits on the previously draw chart itself.
  • 52. LOGO CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE Step 11 If the points other than the eliminated points fall within the revised control limits, accept the revised control limits for present and future use. Step 12 If one or more points other than the removed points fall outside the revised control limits, repeat the process as before.
  • 53. LOGO CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE TYPES OF ATTRIBUTE CHARTS ARE : TYPE p – chart chart for fraction rejected np – chart chart for number of defective c – chart chart for non-conformities u - chart chart for non-conformities per unit
  • 54. LOGO P CHART FORMULA n p p(1 p) UCL  p 3 n p p(1 p) LCL  p  3 Totalnumberinspected  p  Total numberof defectives p CentreLine,CL The centre line and upper and lower control limits for the P charts are :
  • 55. LOGO P CHART EXAMPLE Day No. of defectives 1 4 2 0 3 3 4 2 5 3 6 5 7 1 8 2 9 2 10 0 Problem : (constant sample size) The following table gives the result of inspection of 50 items per day for 20 days. Construct the fraction defectives or percent defectives chart and give inference about the process. Day No. of defectives 11 3 12 4 13 2 14 5 15 1 16 0 17 4 18 4 19 5 20 2
  • 56. LOGO P CHART EXAMPLE 1000 Solution : (constant sample size) Centre Line,CLp  p  Total number of defectives  52  0.052 Total number inspected 50 0.052(10.052) n p UCL  p  3 p(1 p)  0.052  3  0.052 0.0942  0.1462 50 0.052(10.052) n p LCL  p  3 p(1 p)  0.052  3  0.052 0.0942  0.0422  0
  • 57. LOGO P CHART EXAMPLE Inference : •All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the random pattern. •The process is in control. •This limits can be used for future references.
  • 58. LOGO P CHART EXAMPLE Problem : (variable sample size) Construct the fraction defectives or percent defectives chart and give inference about the process. Day Sample size No. of defectives 1 200 4 2 200 2 3 300 4 4 300 5 5 300 3 6 300 3 7 250 1 8 250 2 9 250 2 10 250 4 Day Sample size No. of defectives 11 250 2 12 250 5 13 250 4 14 250 5 15 250 2 16 200 0 17 200 1 18 200 3 19 200 1 20 200 3
  • 59. LOGO Samples n number of defective p UCL CL LCL 1 200 4 0.020 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644 2 200 2 0.010 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644 3 300 4 0.013 0.067 0.0115 -0.04397 4 300 5 0.017 0.067 0.0115 -0.04397 5 300 3 0.010 0.067 0.0115 -0.04397 6 300 3 0.010 0.067 0.0115 -0.04397 7 250 1 0.004 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 8 250 2 0.008 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 9 250 2 0.008 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 10 250 4 0.016 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 11 250 2 0.008 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 12 250 5 0.020 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 13 250 4 0.016 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 14 250 5 0.020 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 15 250 2 0.008 0.072 0.0115 -0.04926 16 200 0 0.000 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644 17 200 1 0.005 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644 18 200 3 0.015 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644 19 200 1 0.005 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644 20 200 3 0.015 0.080 0.0115 -0.05644 Total 4850 56 0.228 P CHART EXAMPLE Solution : (variable sample size)
  • 60. LOGO P CHART EXAMPLE Inference : •All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the random pattern. •The process is in control. •This limits can be used for future references.
  • 61. LOGO np CHART FORMULA np(1 p) UCLnp  np 3 np(1 p) LCLnp  np  3 Number ofsamples  np  Total numberof defectives np CentreLine,CL The centre line and upper and lower control limits for the np charts are :
  • 62. LOGO np CHART EXAMPLE Problem : The following table gives the result of inspection of 100 items per day for 25 days. Construct the fraction defectives or percent defectives chart and give inference about the process. Sample n Number of defective 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 100 100 100 100 0 1 0 1
  • 63. LOGO np CHART EXAMPLE 25 Solution : Centre Line,CLnp  np  Total number of defectives  25  1 . 0 No.ofsamples 1.0(10.01) np(1 p)  1 .0  3 UCLnp  np  3  1 .0  2.985  3.985 1.0(10.01) np(1 p)  1 .0  3 LCLnp  np  3  1 .0 2.985  1.985  0  0.01 25 2500 p  Total number of defectives  Total number inspected
  • 64. LOGO np CHART EXAMPLE Inference : •All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the random pattern. •The process is in control. •This limits can be used for future references.
  • 65. LOGO C CHART FORMULA The centre line and upper and lower control limits for the c charts are : UCLc  c  3 c LCLc  c  3 c Number ofsamples  c  Total number of defects CLc
  • 66. LOGO C CHART EXAMPLE Problem : In a copper foil laminations process for every 500 feet of foil laminated, one square foot of the laminated copper foil is examned for visual defect such as unever lamination, scrath, etc. The data collected are shown in the table below. Calculate the control limit and plot the c-chart. Time Number of Defect 5 3 2 6 6 7 3 3 6 7 7 9 7 5 3 12 6 10 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 100 200 7 2 6 8 0 7 4 3
  • 67. LOGO np CHART EXAMPLE Solution : 26 No.ofsamples Centre Line,CLc  c  Total number of defects  144  5.54 UCLc  c  3 c  5.54  3 5.54  5.54  7 .0 6 12.60 LCLc  c  3 c  5.54  3 5.54  5.54 7.06  1.52  0
  • 68. LOGO C CHART EXAMPLE Inference : •All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the random pattern. •The process is in control. •This limits can be used for future references.
  • 69. LOGO U CHART FORMULA n u u UCL  u 3 n u u LCL  u 3 n u CentreLine,CL  u  c The centre line and upper and lower control limits for the u charts are :
  • 70. LOGO U CHART EXAMPLE Problem : A radio manufacturer wishes to use SQC charts for the detection of non-conformities per unit on the final assembly line. The sample size is finalised as 10 radios. The data collected are shown in the table. Calculate the control limit and plot the u-chart. Sample number Number of non-conformities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 10 11 15 10 14 13 18 12 19 20 18 14 17 20 22 18 19 20 10 14 12
  • 71. LOGO U CHART EXAMPLE 20 Solution : c  Total number of defects  307 15.35 No.ofsamples 10 1.54 u UCL  u  3 u 1.54  3 n 1.54 1.18  2.72 10 n Centre Line,CLu  u  c  15.35 1.53 10 1.54 n 1.54 1.18  0.36 u LCL  u  3 u 1.54  3
  • 72. LOGO U CHART EXAMPLE Sample number Sample size Number of non-conformities (c) Number of non-conformities per unit (u) 1 10 18 1.8 2 10 20 2.0 3 10 10 1.0 4 10 11 1.1 5 10 15 1.5 6 10 10 1.0 7 10 14 1.4 8 10 13 1.3 9 10 18 1.8 10 10 12 1.2 11 10 19 1.9 12 10 20 2.0 13 10 18 1.8 14 10 14 1.4 15 10 17 1.7 16 10 20 2.0 17 10 22 2.2 18 10 10 1.0 19 10 14 1.4 20 10 12 1.2
  • 73. LOGO U CHART EXAMPLE Inference : •All the sample points fall within the control limit and pattern of variation shows the random pattern. •The process is in control. •This limits can be used for future references.