45% SIMILARIT Y INDEX EXCLUDE QUOT ES OFF EXCLUDE BIBLIOGRAPHY OFF The Leader as a Strategist Report ORIGINALITY REPORT The Leader as a Strategist Report WRITECHECK REPORT PAGE 1 Missing "," Yo u may need to place a co mma af ter this wo rd. PAGE 2 PAGE 3 S/V T his subject and verb may no t agree. Pro o f read the sentence to make sure the subject agrees with the verb. Article Error Yo u may need to use an article bef o re this wo rd. Co nsider using the article t he . Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article. Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article. PAGE 4 Article Error Yo u may need to use an article bef o re this wo rd. P/V Yo u have used the passive vo ice in this sentence. Depending upo n what yo u wish to emphasize in the sentence, yo u may want to revise it using the active vo ice. Missing "," Yo u may need to place a co mma af ter this wo rd. PAGE 5 Conf used Yo u have used it s in this sentence. Yo u may need to use it 's instead. Proof read T his part o f the sentence co ntains a grammatical erro r o r misspelled wo rd that makes yo ur meaning unclear. Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article. P/V Yo u have used the passive vo ice in this sentence. Depending upo n what yo u wish to emphasize in the sentence, yo u may want to revise it using the active vo ice. PAGE 6 Assignment Component Unsatisfactory Emerging Proficient Exemplary Score Content Knowledge: Understanding Communicates understanding of the organization’s current vision, mission, and strategy. CO: 3 MSM PO: 2,4 MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3 MSOL PO: 1,5 ILO: 1,3,6 Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic. Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline. Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples. Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic. Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline. Response provides few details and examples. Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic. Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times. Response provides necessary details and specific examples. Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations. Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times. Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider different perspectives. Unsatisfactory: <56 Emerging: 57-66 Proficient: 67-76 Exemplary: 77-80 ______ / 80 pts Comments Content Knowledge: Application Comp.

1. 45%
SIMILARIT Y INDEX
EXCLUDE QUOT ES OFF
EXCLUDE
BIBLIOGRAPHY

2. OFF
The Leader as a Strategist Report
ORIGINALITY REPORT
The Leader as a Strategist Report
WRITECHECK REPORT
PAGE 1
Missing "," Yo u may need to place a co mma af ter this wo rd.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
S/V T his subject and verb may no t agree. Pro o f read the
sentence to make sure the subject agrees with the
verb.
Article Error Yo u may need to use an article bef o re this wo
rd. Co nsider using the article t he .
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
PAGE 4
Article Error Yo u may need to use an article bef o re this wo
rd.
P/V Yo u have used the passive vo ice in this sentence.
Depending upo n what yo u wish to emphasize in the

3. sentence, yo u may want to revise it using the active vo ice.
Missing "," Yo u may need to place a co mma af ter this wo rd.
PAGE 5
Conf used Yo u have used it s in this sentence. Yo u may need
to use it 's instead.
Proof read T his part o f the sentence co ntains a grammatical
erro r o r misspelled wo rd that makes yo ur
meaning unclear.
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
P/V Yo u have used the passive vo ice in this sentence.
Depending upo n what yo u wish to emphasize in the
sentence, yo u may want to revise it using the active vo ice.
PAGE 6
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of the

4. organization’s current vision, mission, and strategy.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central
concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic
within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant
examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central
concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific
topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central
concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific
topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary
times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central
concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and
recommendations.

5. Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the
specific topic within the discipline and its applications in
contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific
examples that consider different perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <56
Emerging: 57-66
Proficient: 67-76
Exemplary: 77-80
______ / 80 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to analyze the “strategic
cascade” of the organization
and complete a SWOT analysis.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue

6. within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the
context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not
consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the
topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world
contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant
literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the
disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using relevant details and
numerous examples.

7. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based
on sound theories and best practices leading to effective
conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <30
Emerging: 31-34
Proficient: 35-38
Exemplary: 39-40
______ / 40 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 2
Communicates the ability to summarize the
internal environment, including the
organization’s values and the key elements
that influence the worker’s behavior.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the

8. disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the
context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not
consistently done.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the
topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world
contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the
disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using relevant details and
numerous examples.

9. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based
on sound theories and best practices leading to effective
conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <30
Emerging: 31-34
Proficient: 35-38
Exemplary: 39-40
______ / 40 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 3
Communicates the ability to state the ability of the
organization to implement the strategy.
CO: 1,2,3
MSM PO: 1,2,4,5
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,4,5
ILO: 1,2,3,4, 5, 6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.

10. Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the
context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not
consistently done.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the
topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world
contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the
disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using relevant details and
numerous examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based
on sound theories and best practices leading to effective
conclusions.

11. Unsatisfactory: <14
Emerging: 15-16
Proficient: 17-18
Exemplary: 19-20
______ / 20 pts
Comments
Written Communication/Personal Effectiveness
Conveys through written word understanding and application of
the essential assignment components.
CO: 1,2,3
MSM PO: 1,2,4,5
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,4,5
ILO: 1,2,3,4, 5, 6
Writing is disorganized and lacks appropriate APA style and
format.
Writing is unclear and includes major grammatical and usage
errors.
Writing shows gaps with respect to organization and rhetoric;
has some errors with respect to APA style and format;
Writing is somewhat clear, but includes some major
grammatical or usage errors.
Writing is concise and clear in content, language use, grammar,
organization, and sentence structure.
Writing is free of major grammatical and usage errors.

12. Writing is professional and scholarly, reflecting mastery of
content, language use, grammar, organization, and sentence
structure.
Writing is cohesive, convincing, and well composed.
Unsatisfactory: <14
Emerging: 15-16
Proficient: 17-18
Exemplary: 19-20
______ / 20 pts
Comments
Total:
/ 200 pts