LASA Rubric Assignment Component Unsatisfactory < 76% Emerging 77%-86% Proficient 87%-96% Exemplary 97%-100% Score Communicates the ability to evaluate and apply relevant academic literature CO 2 PO 2,3,4 ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6 Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area. Response fails to provide supporting details or examples. Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details. Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline. Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done. . Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content. Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and numerous examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and provides insightful recommendations related to real world contexts. Response is supported by current and relevant literature based on sound theories and best practices leading to effective conclusions. Unsatisfactory: <30 Emerging: 31-34 Proficient: 35-38 Exemplary: 39-40 ______ / 40 pts Comments Communicates the ability to analyze the case through the four frames CO 2 PO 2,3,4 ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6 Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area. Response fails to provide supporting details or examples. Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details. Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline. Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done. . Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature R ...

1. LASA Rubric
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
< 76%
Emerging
77%-86%
Proficient
87%-96%
Exemplary
97%-100%
Score
Communicates the ability to evaluate and apply relevant
academic literature
CO 2
PO 2,3,4
ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the
context of the topic area using a few details.

2. Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not
consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the
topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world
contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant
literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the
disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using relevant details and
numerous examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based
on sound theories and best practices leading to effective
conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <30

3. Emerging: 31-34
Proficient: 35-38
Exemplary: 39-40
______ / 40 pts
Comments
Communicates the ability to analyze the case through the four
frames
CO 2
PO 2,3,4
ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the
context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not
consistently done.

4. .
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the
topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world
contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant
literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the
disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using relevant details and
numerous examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based
on sound theories and best practices leading to effective
conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <45
Emerging: 46-51
Proficient: 52-57
Exemplary: 58-60

5. ______ / 60 pts
Comments
Communicates the ability to identify the main problematic
issues hindering performance in the case
CO 1
PO 1,3
ILO 1,2,3,4,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the
context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not
consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary
content knowledge.

6. Response examines the specific issue within the context of the
topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world
contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant
literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the
disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using relevant details and
numerous examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based
on sound theories and best practices leading to effective
conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <30
Emerging: 31-34
Proficient: 35-38
Exemplary: 39-40
______ / 40 pts
Comments
Communicates the ability to develop a strategy for addressing a

7. problematic issue found in the case, by utilizing a new frame
(including considerations on ethics and social responsibility).
CO 3
PO 1,2,3,4
ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge;
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the
context of the topic area using a few details
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline
Response is supported by current literature, but is not
consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary
content knowledge
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the
topic area using relevant details and examples

8. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world
contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant
literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the
disciplinary content
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using relevant details and
numerous examples
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based
on sound theories and best practices leading to effective
conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <45
Emerging: 46-51
Proficient: 52-57
Exemplary: 58-60
______ / 60 pts
Comments
Communicates the ability to summarize the key points learned
from applying a new frame to solve an existing workplace
problem

9. CO 3
PO 1,2,3,4
ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge;
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the
context of the topic area using a few details
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline
Response is supported by current literature, but is not
consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary
content knowledge
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the
topic area using relevant details and examples
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable

10. areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world
contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant
literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the
disciplinary content
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using relevant details and
numerous examples
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable
areas within the discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based
on sound theories and best practices leading to effective
conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <45
Emerging: 46-51
Proficient: 52-57
Exemplary: 58-60
______ / 60 pts
Comments
Written Communication/Personal Effectiveness
Conveys through written word understanding and application of
the essential assignment components
PO 3

11. ILO 2, 4, 6
Writing is disorganized; lacks appropriate APA style and
format;
Writing is unclear and includes major grammatical and usage
errors.
Writing shows some gaps with respect to organization and
rhetoric; has some errors with respect to APA style and format;
Writing is somewhat clear and includes some major grammatical
or usage errors.
Writing is concise and clear in content, language use, grammar,
organization, and sentence structure;
Writing is free of major grammatical and usage errors.
Writing is professional and scholarly, reflecting mastery of
content, language use, grammar, organization, and sentence
structure;
Writing is cohesive, convincing, and well composed
Unsatisfactory: <26
Emerging: 27-33
Proficient: 34-39
Exemplary: 38-40
______ / 40 pts
Comments

12. Total:
/ 300 pts