A Jury Of Her Peers Summary

A Jury Of Her Peers Summary
In the short story A Jury Of Her Peers, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters uncover the horrible truth behind
the murder of Mr. Wright. During the story the women find out that it was Mrs. Wright who
murdered Mr. Wright. Although Mrs. Wright claimed to be asleep during her husband's murder, she
did indeed have the motive to murder Mr. Wright as evidenced by the broken bird cage, slaughtered
canary, and the errant quilt patch. The first clue that the woman find is the errant quilt patch. While
going through Mrs. Wright's house they find a quilt, and on closer examination notice one quilt
patch off from the rest. Mrs. Peters states, ""The sewing, All the rest of them have been so nice and
even–but–this one. Why, it looks as if she didn't know what she ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In Mrs. Wright's kitchen tucked away the women find a small little box. In the box they find a dead
canary. Mrs. Peters says "'Somebody wrung its neck,' Mrs. Peters looked from the dead bird to the
broken door of the cage." Now we know that someone killed the bird. When Mrs. Hale says "No,
Wright wouldn't like the bird," she reveals the culprit in the bird's killing. Referring to the bird as "a
thing that sang," she continues that " [Mrs. Wright] used to sing. He killed that too.'" Mr. Wright
killed the bird out of rage because, like his wife's, its jovial nature annoyed him. Now we know that
it was Mr. Wright that snapped the cannary's neck. The death of the one thing that meant a great deal
to her would have been sufficient motive for
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

A Jury Of Her Peers Theme
In "A Jury of Her Peers" by Susan Glaspell, Mr. Peters, a small town sheriff, looks into an
interesting case: the murder of Mr. Wright. Joining him are his wife, Mrs. Peters, and Mrs. Hale, a
once close friend to Minnie Foster, currently known as Mrs. Wright. Once Mr. Peters is in the house
he struggles to find any clues that suggest who the killer is and his or her motives, but the two
women do. They find significant evidence that leads them to assume that Mrs. Wright is the killer.
Although Mrs. Wright claims to have been asleep during her husband's murder, the women conclude
she strangled her husband, Mr. Wright, as evidenced by the broken birdcage, the slaughtered canary,
and the errant quilt patch.
First Mrs. Peters discovers something interesting about a birdcage. She says "Look at the door...It's
broken. One hinge has been pulled apart" (Glaspell). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mrs. Peters notices that Mrs. Wright was piecing a quilt. Both see that the craftsmanship of the quilt
is declining. One minute Most of the patches are neat and tidy and then "as if she didn't know what
she was about!" (Glaspell) they get untidy and the thread taut as if it might snap any minute. Again
both ladies eyes met, which is an ongoing pattern in the story that symbolizes when they fully
understand. The errant quilt patches lead the women to a clear killer because they have full evidence
that shows that Minnie was distraught over the killing of her bird and finished with the abusive
treatment from her husband that eventually drives her mad and we see that through the quilt. Minnie
had decided when quilting how she was going to kill him by tying a knot around his neck. The two
women know this verdict, yet continue to ignore it. Mrs. Hale actually starts to fix the odd patches.
They give excuses for the bad quilting so that they can protect Minnie. Mrs. Hale keeps a calm
demeanor and insists that Minnie was maybe just

A Jury Of Her Peers
A Jury of Her Peers
"A Jury of Her Peers" tells the story of two men and their wives discovering the details of a murder
scene. While the men search for blatantly obvious clues around the scene, the women notice small
details that piece together the story of why Minnie strangled her husband John in his sleep. The
story revolves around the gender roles that the women were forced into. These roles helped them to
understand what Minnie was going through and what happened to her husband. The irony in the
differences between the women's roles and their husbands is what solved the case.
The story is written from Mrs. Hale's point of view with a third–person limited approach. This
allows the reader to understand the details from a woman's point of view, which is important as it
give insight into the state of the house that the men did not notice. Mrs. Hale is also an important
character because she brings previous knowledge of Minnie before she was married and how she
has changed through the years. She is also the only one who can explain the real John Wright. She
says that he was publically considered "good...he didn't drink, and kept his word as well as
most...and paid his debts" (555). However, she knew that he was a "hard man" (555) and must have
been difficult to live with.
In the early 1900s women were seen as inferior to men. Mr. Peters and Mr. Hale reflect this attitude
on several occasions, mocking the women for "worrying over trifles" (547). Ironically, the "trifles"
the

A Jury Of Her Peers Analysis
Women's rights were a significant issue in the nineteenth century, and in "A Jury of Her Peers." The
men overlooked the rights and problems that the women in "A Jury of Her Peers" were enduring.
Women, however, through these issues, have been able to come together. In "A Jury of Her Peers,"
the journey of women's rights portrays women's unity. In "A Jury of Her Peers," Susan Glaspell uses
the men's belittlement and the women's responses to show their differences. For example, when the
men laugh about the women's question of the quilt, Mrs. Hale responds with "our taking up our time
with little things while we're waiting for them to get the evidence. I don't see as it's anything to
laugh about" (Glaspell 8). Seeing these differences bring ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The home was certainly not cheerful but not because of Mrs. Wright but because of her husband.
The women are Mrs. Wright's only hope of being understood because they are ones that can
understand what it is like to be under the oppression of having no rights to say or do anything
against their husbands. Being that they were just simple housewives, they had to do things like store
cherries, quilt, and wash towels. This allowed the women to see the importance of small things, for
example, the question of whether "she was going to quilt it or just knot it" (Glaspell 8). The women
can "notice the smallest details of Minnie's life, respectfully acknowledging their significance"
(Kamir). The women's comments and questions were menial to the men, and they even scoffed at
them, but without the women being inquisitive, they may have never discovered the dead bird. The
bird being a major clue in the motive of the crime. The bird, in itself, is a symbol of Mrs. Wright's
life and her happiness. The event of the bird's death shows how Mrs. Wright's husband killed what
she loved and how he was oppressive to her. He took away everything that was valuable to her like
her bird, and her love for singing. "No, Wright wouldn't like the bird," she said after that––"a thing
that sang. She used to sing. He killed that too." Mrs. Hale even admits that he "killed" Mrs. Wright's
singing (Glaspell 12). "The women reason that the strangled bird

Comparing 'Trifles And A Jury Of Her Peers'
Compare and Contrast Essay
Susan Glaspell lived from 1876–1948. She was the cofounder of the first modern American theater
company called the Provincetown Players, along with having been a pulitzer prize winning
playwright, an actress, a novelist, and a journalist, so she was kind of a jack of all trades, meaning
she had many different talents or skills. Glaspell was raised in Iowa, and therefore she set place
many of her pieces of writing in the state of Iowa. "Trifles" is a one act play that is based on a
murder trial that Glaspell covered as a young reporter. "A Jury of Her Peers" is the short story
version of this famous play. There are several similarities and differences between the play "Trifles"
and the short story "A Jury of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As I stated above, "Trifles" only gives the reader or viewer knowledge from the outside looking in.
The short story "A Jury of Her Peers" doesn't give the reader first person feelings and experiences,
however, the narrator of the story does give the reader any thoughts or feelings of the characters that
may be needed to better understand the story. The narrator is an important part in the change
between the play and the story. The narrator gives us information about each family, how people are
related, what things look like, what the weather is like, and many more small details that we would
not have known otherwise. For example, when arriving at the Wright house, the narrator says "It
looked very lonesome on this cold March morning." This short sentence gives the reader so much
information that we don't know about in the play. We now know that it is in the morning when they
are going to examine the situation, and that its in March, so it's kind of cold still coming out of
winter. We also know that the Wright house looks lonely. This picture that the narrator puts in the
readers head is one that sets the tone for the whole story. One that we don't fully get until halfway
through

Evaluation Of A Jury Of Her Peers
Given the choice, I prefer the title "A Jury of Her Peers" for Susan Glaspell's story. I believe it
conveys more of the complexities of the conflict. The short story was published a year after the play
however, I don't feel it shows. The story is not altered due to the time that passed between them. It
was a smart choice for Glaspell to omit John Wright and his wife from the story because had they
been included, we would have formed opinions of them for ourselves instead of from their peers. By
learning about them through other characters, it almost is like being a part of her jury. Mrs. Peters
and Mrs. Hale don't reveal the evidence they discover because it is incriminating for Minnie.
Throughout the story the women learn more about

Trifles And A Jury Of Her Peers Essay
Compare and contrast essay trifles and a jury of her peers by Glaspell The play "Trifles" and the
short story "A jury of her peers" by Susan Glaspell is similar stories expressed through different
channels with little distinction between them expressing Glaspell's view of how women are treated
at the twist in time. During the 1900s women were looked down upon by men who did not
understand the hard work done in the daily chores by women. Glaspell is a celebrated feminist
although her story does not enclose traditional feminist views of equal rights for both sexes which
are vital. At the time the play was written, it was known for being negative towards women as they
did not dare to stand for themselves. The play is written in a narrative form 'a jury of her peers.'
Women should be treated like ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The paper seeks to discuss the similarities and differences between' trifles' and 'a jury of her peers.'
Such as irony/theme, use of language, and descisions of the women 'Trifles' contrasts to the 'A jury
of her peers' firstly, the title is an ironic reference to the domestic objects and activities that
constitute women's lives at that time and what could be used against Mrs. Wright. The play
illustrates how men notice different things than women. The play defines the three women's
complicity and is more of a debate about how women should be treated and judged in a criminal
case. In the play is physically segregated from the men, in their bubble being poked by men. It
creates room for imagination meaning the reader can imagine what the scene is portraying.the plays
revolve around insignificant things that judge Mrs. Wright. In the play trifles, justice is a theme
portrayed within the play as the wives of the men knew that Mrs. Wright(Minnie) was constantly
abused by her husband, appreciated the reason of killing him and hide the evidence so she could not
be found guilty. Psychology in the play as a

Analysis Of A Jury Of Her Peers
There are two stories left me with nothing but thought about the difference between the point of
view of woman and man, and how they are treated in social life. The first one is "Where Are You
Going, Where Have You Been?" which is subtitled "Selected Early Stories" offers readers the
opportunity to reevaluate and celebrate Joyce Carol Oates contributions of contemporary American
short story. Sometimes what an individual perceives something as can be the complete opposite of
what it truly is. People create illusions or almost fantasy perceptions on what they believe something
to be. The major theme in the story is the conflict between fantasy and reality. The story "A Jury of
her Peers" which is based on a court case she witnessed as a reporter for the Des Moines Daily
News in Iowa and adapted from her classic play Trifles. Challenging a culture in a patriarchal world
during the early 20th century, Susan Glaspell wrote this dramatic short story. On its surface, "A Jury
of Her Peers" appears a simple detective story, but through extensive dialogue between two women,
Glaspell slowly reveals the story's true underlying conflict: the struggle of women in a male–
dominated society.
Oates illustrates Connie as a fifteen–year old girl who is trying to find herself as a woman. Connie is
constantly concerned with the way she looks and has a habit of "craning her neck to glance into
mirrors or checking other people's faces to make sure her own was all right". She realizes that she

A Jury Of Her Peers And Trifles Analysis
A Jury of Her Peers vs Trifles "A Jury of Her Peers" and "Trifles" by Susan Glaspell are the same
stories, but in different literary formats. These stories are based on the stereotype of women in
society in the early 1900s. The roles of women as anything other than homemakers were
downgraded. The stories showed how men, of that time, never considered just how hard women
worked doing all of the household chores every day. These stories showed women who were treated
like children and have no meaning in the workforce or anything else besides serving the men. "A
Jury of Her Peers" and "Trifles" share the same plot; however, "Trifles" is a play and "A Jury of Her
Peers" is a short story. This makes the same story be told differently because of the genres of
literature. A play is represented in a theatrical performance or on film. A short story is a story with a
fully developed theme but significantly shorter and less elaborate than a novel. It was easier to read
the play rather than read the short story. However, the short story gave more content towards the
story Glaspell was telling her readers by showing the point of view of both the men and women,
while "Trifles" just explains the story.
Something that was interesting was the titles Glaspell gave each story was very unique. Glaspell
named the short story, "A Jury of Her Peers" because Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peter decided Minnie
Wright's fate. Also, the women decided not to turn in the evidence that could seal Minnie's fate.

Critical Analysis Of A Jury Of Her Peers
In a world where showing a bit too much shoulder was forbidden, came Susan Glaspell. Glaspell
was an American playwright, born in the cruel times of oppression. This influenced women's
opinions on certain subjects which caused them to be silenced by fear of rejection from society. "A
Jury of Her Peers" was based on an era where women felt as though it was unreasonable to speak up
if they felt it was not absolutely dire. Harboring these pent up feelings could cause a person to act
antagonistic. Minnie Wright was an example of this. She killed her husband and was subjected to the
judgement of her peers. As the group investigated Mr. Wright's death, there were two stories
unraveling. The in depth explanation that the women figured out and the simplistic version the men
had seemed to pick up (Glaspell). People would benefit from reading this story to begin to
understand the struggle of what this and other women had gone through. Penn Manor American
Literature students would benefit from having Susan Glaspell's story "A Jury of Her Peers" in their
curriculum because of how she expressed feminism through her writing at a time when it was new
and discouraged; her ability to emphasize the themes with her settings and characters; and her
literature that follows a protagonist that navigates through a sexist world.
In spite of the generation, Susan Glaspell refused concede into its way of life. She advocated for
feminism during this time period. Glaspell's "A Jury of Her Peers" should be included in Penn
Manor's American Literature curriculum because of her capability to express feminism at a time
where it was discouraged. It is important to realize that the time of the short story, "A Jury of Her
Peers" was created, it was not the most understanding age. Majority of the people had a mindset of
thinking situations were black and white. They would only see the circumstances that occurred in
world in extremes, and they would not consider the other side. Explained in this section:
When Henderson's criticism of Minnie's domestic skills rouses a defense from Mrs. Hale about the
incredible demands of farm work, the young attorney patronizes her with, "Ah, loyal to your sex, I
see" (1392). As the men finally leave the kitchen,

A Jury Of Her Peers
Throughout history there has always been male dominance culture. In all societies men have been
superior than w the omen. In the play "A Doll's House" by Henrik Ibsen, the main character Nora,
by the end of the play goes against the male dominance culture. "A Jury of Her Peers" by Susan
Glaspell shows how women prove the men wrong in the sexism culture which goes against them
(women). This controversy is something interesting as there can be two sides of it. In this case,
women are going against the male dominance culture and the sexism culture that exists in their
society.
In Henriks Ibsens "A Dolls House" Nora decides to go against the male dominance culture by
getting herself in a debt to save her husbands life. During that time period ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Women were expected to get married, have children and take care of the household. At the end of
the play Nora decides that she doesn't want to be an object her husband can "paly" around with so
she abandons her family in search of freedom. She says to her husband Torvald, "Our home has
been nothing but a playroom. I have been your doll–wife." (Ibsen) throughout the play one can see
how Torvald does in fact treat his wife like a doll, from deciding what is good for her to eat or not,
to deciding which dress she should wear. Nora was portrayed as an object, which Torvald
dominated. Due to this she leaves to be independent and not be controlled any

The Underestimation of Womans Capabilities in A Jury of Her Peers An initial reading of A Jury of
Her Peers suggests that the author focuses on the common stereotypes of women in the 1800s;
however, a close reading reveals that the text also examines the idea that they are more capable than
men may think. The fact that Mrs. Wright was able to pull off killing her husband by herself and
without the men finding out proves that she is very capable and did not need the help of men to pull
it off. The men at the time believed that women were incapable of doing things by themselves and
thought that they should just stay in the kitchen, cook, and clean. They thought that they could not
manage to do things that men could and did not trust them with a man's job. The men in this story
were very stereotypical of the women's capabilities. It says in the text, "'Oh, well,' said Mrs. Hale's
husband, with good–natured superiority, 'women are used to worrying over trifles.'"(Glaspell) Mrs.
Hale's husband in the story was being very stereotypical about what women are used to. He says that
women are used to worrying about small things and is saying that they are over dramatic. Mrs.
Hale's husband also went on to say, "'Dirty towels! Not much of a housekeeper, would you say,
ladies?'" (Glaspell) Him saying this is not only insulting their ability to clean but he is also saying
this like it is their job to clean the towels. He also says this in a very demeaning and arrogant
manner. The men

A Jury Of Her Peers
Glaspell spent more than forty years working as a journalist, fiction writer, playwright and promoter
of various artistic. She is a woman who lived in a male dominated society. She is the author of a
short story titled A Jury of Her Peers. She was inspired to write this story when she investigated in
the homicide of John Hossack, a prosperous county warren who had been killed in his sleep(1).Such
experience in Glaspell's life stimulated inspiration. The fact that she was the first reporter on scene,
explains that she must have found everything still in place, that makes an incredible impression. She
feels what Margaret (who is Minnie Wright in the story) had gone through, that is, she has sympathy
for her. What will she say about Margaret? Will she portray Margaret as the criminal or the woman
who's life has been taken away? In the short story Minnie Wright was the victim. Based on evidence
at the crime scene, it is clear that Minnie has killed her husband; however, the women have several
reasons for finding her "not guilty" of the murder of John Wright.
First, When Martha and Mrs. Peters arrive at the scene of the crime, they see that it is a very lonely
place off the road. The house is in a hollow, with lone–some looking trees around it(1).Mr. Hale
thinks that having a phone to communicate with rest of the world in such place will reduce
loneliness although Mr. Wright does not want communication(2). Minnie lives a miserable life in
this place. Martha cannot believe that

A Jury Of Her Peers Literary Analysis
The characters in "A Jury of Her Peers" and "The Necklace" are influenced by status, diction, and
character. The stories are both set in time periods from long ago. These stories are very different, yet
similar. The stories "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant and "A Jury of Her Peers" by Susan
Glaspell use irony to emphasize the theme of fate vs. free will. In "The Necklace", Mathilde Loisel
is a woman who cannot tolerate her lower–class status, believing "herself born for every delicacy
and luxury"(82). Mathilde's vain materialistic goals, make her bitter and unhappy. The main point of
irony in the story is the fact that Mathilde borrows the necklace and looses it. The necklace was very
expensive, or so she thought, so she ended up in poverty ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The lesson to take out of both of these stories is honesty and courage. "Oh. My poor Mathilde! But
mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs!..."(85). If she had been
honest from the very beginning about loosing the necklace, they never would've ended up in
poverty. It was courageous in a way that the ladies sacrificed and preformed a crime in order to help
their friend. Sometimes we have to do things that are difficult, like admitting that she misplaced the
necklace, but if we do the right thing to begin with the consequences are easier to

Men and women have always had differences spanning across their emotions, their approaches, and
their mindset. Women are subject to being impulsive, while men are known for acting with
precision. Of course, a matter of opinion should be considered when an evaluation of men and
women has been made. For several years, both men and women have yet to be able to understand
one another to the extent of their existence. Rights of one another, as well as restrictions set for each,
have been a recurring issue that has yet to rest in the days of today. The misunderstanding of each
gender can cause difficulty and tension that spirals into chaotic actions being brought forth. No one
can control the outcome of the biased outlook of each person, however, when restricted by societal
laws, the possibility of violence or any other action comes into play. Within the short story "A Jury
of Her Peers", the roles of men and women often caused a vast amount of miscommunication.
The differences between men and women often open doors to situations being handled differently.
Differences can deter positive and negative outcomes. Susan Glaspell portrayed the importance of
different perspectives between men and women through the mannerisms of the characters in "A Jury
of Her Peers". In the story, two women, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, and three men try to decipher the
killer of a local neighbor and the motive of the murder. The wife of the neighbor is, of course, a
suspect in the case. The two

Analysis: A Jury Of Her Peers
In the 20th century story "A Jury of Her Peers" by Susan Glaspell, Mr. Hale and his son find John
Wright strangled to death in his bed. They also find Mr. Wright's wife, Minnie Foster, in a relaxed
state. Though Mrs. Hale and the sheriff's wife Mrs. Peters uncover the incriminating evidence
needed to try Mrs. Wright for murder, they hide their findings from the men. Although Mrs. Wright
does not initially appear capable of such a crime due to her calm demeanor, Mrs. Peters and Mrs.
Hale conclude she strangled her husband as evidenced by the crazily sewn quilt patch, the unhinged
bird cage, and the mutilated canary.
Firstly, the crazily sewn quilt patch suggests that Mrs. Wright was preoccupied with someone or
something else. The patch that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Wright had broken the cage door and killed the bird. The only way the door could have become
unhinged is if considerable force was used on it, because bird cages are built to last a long time. Mr.
Wright, being a "bigger" man, provided that strength. Mrs. Wright could not have due to her small
stature, unless provoked. The owner of the bird is Mrs. Wright. If the owner of the bird was Mr.
Wright then he would not have broken into the cage because pet owners have no need to break into
their pet's cages. This also means that Mr. Wright intended to harm the bird when breaking into the
cage. Mrs. Hale's statement supports the notion of Mrs. Wright having a pet bird, "'There was a man
round last year selling canaries cheap–but I don't know as she took one. Maybe she did. She used to
sing real pretty herself,'" (13). Mrs. Wright would've also wanted a canary because of her husband's
personality. Mrs. Hale suggests that he had a cold personality, "'But he was a hard man. Just to pass
the time of day with him–." She stopped, shivered a little."Like a raw wind that gets to the
bone."..."I should think she would've wanted a bird!'" (14). The mutilated canary proves that Mr.
Wright did break into the cage and he did in fact, kill the bird, as suggested by Mrs. Hale, "'No,
Wright wouldn't have liked the bird," she said after that–"a thing that sang. She used to sing. He
killed that too." Her voice tightened," (17). The murdered bird is what Mrs. Wright was so angry
about when she was sewing that one patch of the quilt. She would've been angry over the murder of
the canary because she loved it, and people get angry when pets they love are hurt or killed. Mrs.
Wright had wrapped the bird in silk and "she was going to bury it in that pretty box," (16). Silk is
expensive material and for Mrs. Wright to intend to use it for her canary's burial indicates her love
for the

Marriage is not something that everyone does the same. The type of people in the relationship, have
a big role to play in the way their marriage works. In the short stories, "The Story of an Hour" and
"A Jury of Her Peers" prove this very well. The marriages in these stories are quite different, and
may even be hard to understand by one another, because this is not the way they lived. Neither of
these marriages would be the so called "ideal marriage" it seems, as in one, the wife may feel
trapped, and she wants to be set free, while in the other, the wife had seemed to change because of
the marriage and kept quite, after the death of her husband, and the question on the table now is, did
she do it? There were also many stereotypical factors ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The sheriff and his wife, Mrs. Gorman, as well as Martha Hale and her husband, had all rode over to
the Wrights place, to investigate, the death, – or was this murder? – of Mrs. Wright's husband. When
the subject was brought up, it did not seem as if the death of Mr. Wright, even fazed his wife. When
Mr. Hale, walked into their house, and asked to see John Wright, Mrs. Wright "laughed" and said no,
"'Cause he's dead," as she continued pleating her apron, not getting the least bit excited. The man
went on to further investigate as the woman began to look around and talk. They started talking
about the way, Mrs. Hale wished she had come to see Minnie (Foster) right, "' I could've come...I
wish I had come over sometimes when she was here. I wish– I had.'" (Glaspell, 677) , although she
had reason for not wanting to come, "' It never seemed a very cheerful place.'" (Glaspell, 672). This
was the way the Wrights lived, and that was that. But was there something more to it? With the
murder of Mr. John Wright, and the reactions of Mrs. Minnie Wright are very contradicting. In a
marriage, two people are supposed to love one another, but after finding all the clues to the
investigation, it lead to question whether Minnie actually loved her husband or

Susan Glaspell's A Jury Of Her Peers
In her stories, Susan Glaspell divulges into gender roles, misogyny, and justice. She especially
focuses on the lives and experiences of women in twentieth century American society. Depending
on the point of view and genre of a story, specific themes can be conveyed and interpreted in
different ways. In "A Jury of Her Peers" and Trifles, the tale of an abusive and neglectful husband
and a lonely housewife is told through the means of a murder mystery. Both works tell the same
story, yet underneath the plot lies second level of depth that can only be understood in "A Jury of
Her Peers" through certain writing devices. The differences in the points of views and the genres of
the two stories, Trifles and "A Jury of Her Peers", affect the characterization ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The genre and points of view of "A Jury of Her Peers" and Trifles affect the atmosphere of the story,
even if the settings are the same. In "A Jury of Her Peers", it starts right away "when Martha Hale
opened the storm–door and got cut of the north wind, she ran back for her big woolen scarf" ("Jury"
1). The reader is put directly into another world, making the story feel more alive. Adversely to this,
Trifles introduces the scene in a big block of text on page 708. This takes away from the flow of the
text, effectively cutting any possible connection between the reader and the story. In another
example, comparing the same scene from both points of view shows the contrast between the merit
of the characters distinctly. When the county sheriff just arrives at the Wright home, he asks Mr.
Hale some questions regarding his last visit to the estate and his talk with Mrs. Wright. As
aforementioned, Trifles and "A Jury of Her Peers" evoke completely different sensations for this
event. In the latter while Mr. Hale is talking to the county sheriff, " Mrs. Hale, still leaning against
the door, had that sinking feeling of the mother whose child is about to speak a piece ... She kept her
eye fixed on her husband, as if to keep him from saying unnecessary things that would go into that
note–book and make trouble....'and so I guess that's all I know that you don't.' He said that last with
relief, and moved a little, as if relaxing" ("Jury" 2). Using third person limited, the reader is given
vision into the feeling of the characters through subtle gestures and actions that change the
atmosphere completely. Through Martha's feeling, the reader can infer that Mr. Hale wasn't that
good at talking and says things he probably shouldn't. On the other hand, Trifles shows no such
actions or shows any actions. There are no gestures, quirks, or really

Jury Of Her Peers Essay
Name: ZaZa Horton
Professor: Leblanc
Course: Anicent Woman in Greece
20 April 2015 Susan Glaspell's "Jury of Her Peers" "Jury of Her Peers" is a short story that revolves
around the strange death of john wright. It is a piece of work that exposes sexism on women.
Women have been categorized for some time now based on their gender and not on ability and
skills. They have always fell at the short end of the stick when compare against men. Nevertheless,
there were many similarities as well as differences in challenges that women faced women. Even in
the ancient times, Women play many important roles both in ancient Greece and in modern society.
In all cases, women are seen as subordinated to men. It does not matter if we were in today times or
the ancient times. In modern time ideally women are to stay at home with the kids and be the
homemaker 's, While on the other hand men are to go out and work to provide for their wife and
children. In jury of her peers the female character Mrs. hale revealed how Mrs. wright had such a
beautiful voice and song for the choir but somehow it all changed when she met john wright. "(She
used to wear pretty clothes and be lively––when she was Minnie Foster, one of the town girls,
singing in the choir. But that––oh, that was twenty years ago." (111) In the ancient Greece men
where frowned upon if they they let a man boss them around. Men in ancient Greece ran the public
sphere. Women were not allowed out unless occopined by a male.

A Jury Of Her Peers And Trifles
The point of view is important in telling any story. How it affects A jury of her peers, and Trifles is a
prime example of how important the point of view is to any story. A jury of her peers, and Trifles are
the same story by the same author however the point of view makes it seem like they are two
different stories. There are many few differences and many similarities. Some of the differences are
that in A jury of her peers it is very biased toward Mrs. Hale. However in Trifles it is less biased
because everything that is said is heard. If one person reads one and another person reads the other
they may have very different idea of how one character really is. In Trifles the male characters only
say sexist thing. While in A jury of her peers

In the late 1800s, after the Civil War, women were left to take over the jobs of men. Many took
advantage of this and decided to let their voices be heard by writing stories. The stories A Story of
an Hour and A Jury of her Peers were both written under these circumstances. The stories take place
in America when women did not have many rights and were neglected as human beings. The
authors, Kate Chopin and Susan Glaspell, wrote their stories in second person which further
highlights that they did this in order to show the fact that women did not have a voice at this time,
and were barely recognised as individual beings and seen as property of men. While both stories
prepare the reader to believe that the authors will be suggesting that the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Both Mrs. Wright and Mrs. Mallard were shadows behind their husbands and barely ever noticed. In
Mrs. Mallard's case she didn't even love her husband at times, and the expectations are that she
cannot leave him. Mrs. Wright was mentally and possibly physically abused by Mr. Wright and he
took everything away from her. She is assumed to have stayed quiet and dealt with whatever
happened– even if it was against her benefit. Eventually both women were demolished because of
society's pre assumptions, and not the measures they took to ensure their own health and happiness.
Within both stories society pushes the female characters to do things that are not best for them, thus
leading them to their doom. This however, also provoked them to take charge of their own lives and
defy whatever expectations are set upon them so that they can experience things

Have you ever wondered why people are the way they are? Subjectivity plays a significant part in
this reason. As subjects of their particular environment, their identities are constructed by gender,
age, geography, beliefs and, so on that makes an individual who they are. The women of A Jury of
Her Peers shared a certain female subjectivity. Female Subjectivity is the reason the women knew
Minnie Wright's motive for killing her husband before the men had figured it out. Female
subjectivity is a perspective that women share. When Mrs. Hale tells Mrs. Peters, "We all go through
the same things–its all just a different kind of the same thing! If it weren't–why do you and I
understand?" She was referring to a subjectivity that women share. Particularly, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The women, of course, were able to "read" the kitchen. Fetterley believes the women remove the
evidence from the scene because they understand that the men could learn to read the text (kitchen)
of women's experience. It is not impossible for the men to see it, but their unwillingness makes it
unlikely. There is a reason why the men refuse to read or see the text because they believe it will
reveal that John Wright may have been a brutal man. Fetterley also claims the men may not want to
discover any evidence that may imply that John was the type of man whose wife would want to
murder him, although it would incriminate Minnie Wright. The interpretation of the kitchen
investigation implies that the definition of a good man/husband is as much at stake as a definition of
a good woman/wife. In the beginning, all the attention is on how poor of a housekeeper Minnie
Wright is, which draws attention away from the possibility that John was a poor companion. When
maintaining the focus of what a woman should do and be, there is a lack of focus on what a man
should be. Which clearly works in favor of the male

Femininity In 'A Jury Of Her Peers'
Early suffrage movements in America began with well known names such as Elizabeth Cady
Stanton and Susan B. Anthony. These women, and many others, are cemented in time as human
rights leaders, and did everything in their power to fight for suffrage. One form of activism,the
seneca falls convention, is well known by many people, and set the stage for the women's suffrage
movement. Another, often overlooked, form of activism is the use of literature and art. Many
writers, such as Emma Goodman and Susan Glaspell, use their writing to convey the social injustice
of their time. Glaspell, in particular, is well known for the femininity within her play, "Trifles" and
her rendition of the play in the short story, "A Jury of Her Peers". Although Glaspell's short story
and her play, "Trifles", ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An overall theme of femininity is highly evident in the play as well as the short story, and is
displayed through the interactions of the characters. Initial evidence of feminism is seen in the play,
when the court attorney relays his plans of searching the premises. He states, "we'll go upstairs first..
and out to the barn and around there". This shows his initial disregard for the possibility of evidence
being found in the kitchen, the "woman's sphere". The sheriff solidifies this belief by saying,
"nothing here but kitchen things". This illustrates that Mrs. Wright's area of the home is of no
concern to them; quite an irrational statement, when investigating a murder. In the short story, this
theme is strengthened when the sheriff laughed for

Jury Of Her Peers Analysis
The story Jury of Her Peers by Susan Glaspell features Martha and Mrs. Peter as the main characters
in the short story. As the author narrates the story, there are key themes and traits which emerge that
contribute to the development of the story and the protagonist such as the marriage conflicts,
friendship, secrecy, scandals, and male–chauvinism and aggression. In brief, the authors of Two
Kinds and Jury of Her Peers aim to show how the main characters have unresolved issues they did
not know about their live until they engage in confrontations. As the author narrates the story, these
key features will advance the plot and help the reader to learn more about the protagonists. When
the story begins, we learn that Martha is happily staying ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Jury of Her Peers, minor characters such as Harry (Mrs. Hales eldest son) and John Wright (the
murdered man) help to develop the characters of the main characters. For John Wright, although he
is not physically, present his death and the investigations make the main characters to redefine their
attitudes towards men. Harry acts as an intersection into the interrogation where his mention of the
telephone paves way for Mrs. Hales to describe the event on the day john write was murdered.
Although Harries does not tell the story, he introduces Mrs. Hales to give an account of the events
that acknowledge Martha and Mrs. Peter that the county attorney would be looking for incriminating
evidence since it was hard to pin down a woman without hard evidence. We can learn that Harry is a
hardworking man and was not around when John Wright was murdered. As a result, this paves way
for Mrs. Hales to narrate the event. John Wright was a quarrelsome to her wife; as a result, they
result fight that leads to him being murdered by his wife and the subsequent investigations that
attracts the two main characters–Martha and Mrs. Peter (Glaspell, 2012). In Two Kinds, Auntie
Lindo and Uncle Tin are examples of flat characters. They were both skeptic that June would thrive
in playing piano. They maintained a skeptic look while June poorly played the piano that after
finishing her performance, they did no applaud her. The

Short Story 'Jury Of Her Peers'
What would she gain?
By rewriting her drama to a short story Glaspell gains different components throughout her writing.
There is a better development in the plot by the way it can be structure. The author can be able to
develop her characters in more detail by revealing their backgrounds, personalities, and thoughts
before taking their decisions. Additionally, elaborating her ideas in the form of a short story
facilitates the determination of the theme and encourages readers to be more open minded and fly
their imagination due to a more descriptive setting.
What is a jury of your peers?
A jury of her peers is a judicial body whose main function is to direct the procedure to investigate a
crime, establish the charges and accuse the person

Rizza De Leon Megan Stein English 1B 24 October 2017 All–Seeing Narrator The third–person
point–of–view is a method of storytelling in which the narrator connects all the actions of their work
using third–person pronouns such as "he" or "she." A third–person point–of–view can be
omniscient; the narrator knows all of the thoughts and feelings of the characters in the story. This
narrator does not show any favoritism or preferences towards the story's characters, and they have
full knowledge of all the characters and situations happening. This form of storytelling helps the
reader as they jump from character to character to better understand the story. Susan Glaspell's "A
Jury of Her Peers" tells the story of Minnie Wright who is on trial for the murder of her husband.
While awaiting trial, Minnie's house is investigated by five people: Lewis Hale, Martha Hale,
George Henderson, Mrs. Peters, and Sheriff Peters. The men search for any evidence to use against
Minnie at her trial. The two women however collect personal belongings to bring to Minnie to help
her get through this difficult time. Both women find strange "trifles" that the men don't notice: a
strangled canary, an irregular quilt pattern, and a dirty kitchen. The men dismiss these findings and
focus solely on finding evidence, simply concluding that Minnie was a neglectful housewife. The
women think otherwise; they conclude that Minnie must have been driven to murder her abusive
husband. They decide to keep silent out

1. Using the elements in Freytag's Pyramid, provide a plot analysis, not summary, for "Two Kinds".
The exposition of Two kinds gives the background on the main character's mother. The importance
of the American dream to Jing–mei's mother makes it easier for us to understand why she has such
high and unrealistic dreams for her daughter. This all starts with them watching Shirley Temple and
her mother stating that Jing–mei needed to be the Chinese Shirley Temple. This is the inciting
incident because at this point in the story, both her mother and Jing–mei are hopeful that this dream
is possible. They both began to work at it but Jing–mei fails at everything her mother tries to make
her do. Finally, after so many failures, her mother makes her ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In "A Rose for Emily", what type of plot structure is used? Why is it effective? The plot structure
used in "A Rose for Emily" is a scenic plot. Faulkner doesn't follow the chronological order of a
traditional plot, but the story still has the main scenes to give it a sort of order. By starting with the
end of the story, he leaves you wanting to understand how the story led up to this event. He also uses
flashbacks that adds to the suspense of what eventually unfolds and does the same with
foreshadowing. For example, adding how Emily handled her father's death foreshadows how she
might react if Homer were to die. 7. Why do you think Carver used the technique of an "open–
ended" plot in "Popular Mechanics"? By using an open–ending, Carver lets the reader create the
ending themselves. It gives the reader the ability to formulate their own idea and piece together the
clues that they think led up to that ending. It creates a more diverse and enticing story. It also brings
reality to the story that like most popular mechanics of divorce and children stuck between it, every
ending is different but the child almost always is the one who gets the most

Comparing Trifles 'And A Jury Of Her Peers'
A Comparison between "Trifles" and "A Jury of Her Peers" Susan Keating Glaspell was an
American playwright, novelist, journalist and actress. She was born July 1, 1876, in Davenport,
Iowa. To most readers Susan Glaspell is still known primarily as the author of Trifles, the frequently
anthologized, classic feminist play about two women's secret discovery of a wife's murder of her
husband, or the short–story "A Jury of Her Peers," a re–writing of that piece. "Trifles" and "A Jury
of Her Peers" are extremely similar to one another in almost every respect. Much of the dialogue is
lifted directly from the play and placed into the short story. Additionally, all of the plot points are the
same, with some insignificant differences. An analysis on Susan Glaspell's play, "Trifles" and her
short story, "A Jury of Her Peers" compares the differences of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The first difference being compared between the two stories is the characterization. In "Trifles,"
Minnie is accused of murder. Her house is then looked at by the Sheriff and the County Attorney,
while she is in prison, to find any evidence that could lead to the reason why she murders her
husband, Mr. Wright. Two other female characters name Mrs. Peter and Mrs. Hale also contribute a
large role in this play because of them, Minnie is described as a character. All three women are
round characters and indirect characters. Mrs. Peter and Mrs. Hale both are having a monologue
throughout the play in which they also provide details of how Minnie could be. Mrs. Peter is a static
character, she is very calm and respect the laws, compare to Mrs. Hale, which is a dynamic
character, she says what she feels to anyone and is always talking like a big mouth. Both characters
are left at the kitchen of Minnie's so called "unpleasant house' due to the lack of cleaning and
solitary vibe that is felt. In this kitchen, both women find lots

Comparing 'Trifles And A Jury Of Her Peers'
In the comparison of "Trifles" and "A Jury of Her Peers" are extremely similar to one another in
almost every respect. Much of the dialogue is lifted directly from the play and placed into the short
story. Additionally, all of the plot points are the same, with some insignificant differences. There are
two main differences: the first is the difference between the titles, which is represented in the pieces
themselves and the second is the difference in characterization. Susan Glaspell uses death, Mystery,
and deception to show the change in both passages.
The difference in the titles, "Trifles" for the play and "A Jury of Her Peers" signals the readers to
two different focuses between the play and the story. The title "Trifles" seems to tell ... Show more
Her use of description and narration brings the characters emotions and actions to life in the reader's
imagination. The use of precise wording in the text elicits from the reader specific emotions that are
conveyed by the characters and settings. Glaspell's use of basically the same dialogue and setting in
both works makes the story familiar to the reader, but the emotions of the characters are explored
more fully by the author in "A Jury of Her Peers". Glaspell's exploration of the character's emotions
and actions and the setting of the story is highly effective at impacting the reader more fully in the
short story version. This effectiveness gives "A Jury of Her Peers" the advantage of greater
emotional impact than its predecessor

Susan Glaspell's 'A Jury Of Her Peers'
Susan Glaspell was an american playwright, novelist, journalist, and actress, alongside being a
strong feminist. Her writings mainly explored contemporary social issues such as gender and ethics.
The play "Trifles" is loosely based on the trial of Margaret Hossack for the murder of her husband,
John Hossack, which Susan reported during her time of being a journalist of "Des Moines Daily".
Her report was based out of Warren County in Iowa. This vicious murder stunned and divided the
close–knit rural community. Neighbors and family members were reluctant to talk about their ideas
on what might have happened that cold night of December first, 1900. With some plot adjustments,
Susan reconstructed her report into "Trifles". The play hints to the perspective men held about
women during the early 1900s. Susan Glaspell then converted her play into the story, "A Jury of Her
Peers". ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All that is revealed to the audience of the playwright about the setting is a few details about the
kitchen. It was now an "abandoned farmhouse" with a "gloomy kitchen" that was blatantly "not put
in order" (558). Specifically, there were "unwashed pans under the sink," a "loaf of bread outside the
breadbox," a "dish towel on the table," and many "signs of incomplete work" (558). On the contrary,
"The Jury of Her Peers" is cram packed with intricate details explaining the environment the
characters are standing in. For example, readers are told that this story is taking place in Dickson
County and upon arriving to the house, it "looked very lonesome this March morning" (568). The
setting of the story opens with Mrs. Hale retrieving a garment then getting into the buggy. This is a
change compared to "Trifles" because it lacks any setting description prior to the Wright's

Murder is one of the most vile, inhuman crimes a person can commit. "A Municipal Report" by O.
Henry and "A Jury of Her Peers" by Susan Glaspell both involve a vindictive murder of an abusive
husband and the hiding of incriminating evidence, however, the two stories also differ in their
purposes. Henry takes the reader through an implausible series of events, taking the reader away
from reality, while Glaspell illustrates the vital individual decisions as well as the morality that goes
with murder, domestic violence, and feminism. "A Municipal Report" does not do more than
entertain the reader, and is commercial fiction, while "A Jury of Her Peers" reveals truths about
human life, and is literary fiction. There are significant differences ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Henry also seeks to entertain the reader by offering contemporary references for the time period and
presenting classics of literature such as Shakespeare's works to engage his audience. He provides
suspense and mystery that completely miss our emotions, by the end of the story the reader has not
been connected to characters and they can only feel what they think they should feel because of the
theme. In "A Jury of Her Peers" the main theme concerns morality and justice and is expressed
through the idea of feminism. The power of decisions lies in the hands of the women rather than the
typical male. At the time this was published, in 1917, the feminist element would have had few
precedents. Women were strictly confined to their roles so controversy over this standard would
have been shocking. Throughout the story there is a constant separation of the men and women such
as gender roles. The attorney talks about how the kitchen is the women's domain while adding "a
little laugh for the insignificance of kitchen things" (394) and gives some pots and pans a "disdainful
push on the foot" (396). Minnie Foster, Mrs. Hale, Mrs. Peters, and women in general, are
consistently being degraded and limited to their gender roles of that time. The reader is meant to feel
sympathetic towards Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters from the very beginning as victims of men's sexism.
The deeper meaning Glaspell is trying to communicate goes straight to the reader's emotions and
senses due to the plights these female characters go

A Jury Of Her Peers Essay
Physiologists have studied people for many years looking into what motivates them to be who they
are. Maslow, Erikson, Piaget and Vygotsky all have their own theory as to the human behavior.
These theories range from needs to wants to even the environment a person is in.
Keltner, Vygotsky, Erikson, Cherry and Harlow all believe that a person is motivated by the social
class in which they are a part. People have the want and desire to change their social class for the
better. In order for people to do this they need to further their education which will give them the
chance to enhance their financial income. Increased income allows for the increase in social class.
The Social class theory also references the people in which a person surrounds ... Show more
These motivations do not need to have an external stimulus. Malsow's theory of the hierarchy of
needs supports this with the top two tiers. Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a pyramid of human needs
in order of importance: physiological is the most basic of human needs which includes food, shelter
and clothing. Human's next need is safety– being safe in our environment and free from harm to our
being. Next is a sense of belongingness and love, which is belonging to a family or a group of
people we view as family. Fourth is esteem, or to have a positive view on one's self and their
accomplishments. Last is self–actualization and self–transcendence being the levels, where people
are able to understand how they operate and make changes to their

Critical Analysis Of A Jury Of Her Peers
"A Jury of Her Peers": Critical Analysis Essay Women's rights were a significant issue in the
nineteenth century, and in "A Jury of Her Peers." The men overlooked the rights and problems that
the women in "A Jury of Her Peers" were enduring. Women, however, through these issues, have
been able to come together. In "A Jury of Her Peers," the journey of women's rights portrays
women's unity.
In "A Jury of Her Peers," Susan Glaspell uses the men's belittlement and the women's responses to
show their differences. For example, when the men laugh about the women's question of the quilt,
Mrs. Hale responds with "our taking up our time with little things while we're waiting for them to
get the evidence. I don't see as it's anything to laugh about" (Glaspell 8). Seeing these differences
bring the two women, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, closer together. At one point in the story, "the two
women moved a little closer together" in response when the men trivialize what trifles women go
through (Glaspell 5). The women see things in the house that the men cannot due to the men never
having to experience being in the place of a housewife. The men failed to see the little details that
women could see. "Belittling the women, the condescending men exclude them from the legal
investigation, doubting the women could recognize a forensic clue", the men doing this causes their
view of the crime to be incomplete, and they fail to recognize that the women were the men's
greatest investigators of this case (Kamir). Mr. Hale even completely ridicules the intelligence of the
women altogether by saying "But would the women know a clue if they did come upon it?"
(Glaspell 6).
Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters both understand and get to know each other by piecing together the crime
scene and also looking at Mrs. Wright's empty house. By the women noticing details and Mrs.
Wright's living conditions, they can see how sad and what little enjoyment Mrs. Wright had in her
home. Mrs. Hale says, "It never seemed a very cheerful place," and later on she says, "But I don't
think a place would be any the cheerfuller for John Wright's bein' in it.", she is revealing the
atmosphere that the home had (Glaspell 5). The home was certainly not cheerful, but not

Women In A Jury Of Her Peers
Walter Mitty is a man who uses his active imagination to escape the pressures of his wife. Shrewd
and controlling nature Walter is constantly emasculated as his wife controls him. Walter's drab life
forces him to cope with vivid imaginings of himself taking command in a dangerous situations,
however his wife smothers this form of self expression too. A "Jury of Our Peers" is another story
which emphasises the downsides and weaknesses of a marital relationships, but instead of fixating
on the man's perspective, like Walter Mitty, now the women's outlook is explored. The women in
this story are dominated by their husbands.They are forced to complete arduous and bland house
work all day. In this story the women's lifestyle after marriage is portrayed as insipid and bleak in
comparison to their once vibrant lives. The main theme that ties these tales together is marital
oppression. In "A Jury of Her Peers" the husbands dominate and oppress their wives. There are
countless examples of the husbands demoralizing and micromanaging their wives. The men force
their wives to clean the house and work tirelessly in the kitchen, while belittling ... Show more
Walter uses his animated fantasies to escape his harsh realities. This allows him to cope with the
constant vexations from his wife. Likewise the women from "A Jury of Her Peers" try defying their
husbands. The women were instructed to stay in the kitchen as the men solve the mystery, and if
they happen to stumble on something they were to report it to the men, but they didn't. The women
actually solved the case. They found the dead bird that gave Minnie Foster the motive to murder;
however they withheld their discovery. This radical act of defiance was monumental. The women
who had spent their whole married lives tirelessly following every whim of their dictatorial
husbands finally stand up for themselves, and prove that they do not like their lifestyle and want to

Comparing Trifles And A Jury Of Her Peers
Order in the court! This is a case of the play Trifles and the story "A Jury of Her Peers," which are
both written by Susan Glaspell. Trifles is a play about the murder investigation of John Wright, who
was strangled and whose wife is the prime suspect for his murder while "A Jury of Her Peers" has
the same plot as Trifles except it's from the point of view of Mrs. Hale, who is a friend of Mrs.
Wright. While both texts have a very similar message and plot, the dialogue and point of view for
Trifles differs from the dialogue and point of view for "A Jury of Her Peers." The first similarity, in
the play and in the story, the meaning behind them are the same. For example, "Martha Hale
snatched the box from the sheriff's wife, and got it

A Jury Of Her Peers: An Analysis
While it can't be guaranteed that a rural individual will act one certain way and an urban individual
will act another, there are some actions and reactions that can be assumed. By looking at urban and
rural life during the 1900s, one can distinguish the tendencies of people who resided in the city as
opposed to people who settled in the country. First of all, in the early 1900s urban and rural life were
both challenging but in different ways. According to the writers of the Dictionary of American
History, "Life for rural women during this period was very difficult and physical. Women were
called upon not only to keep the home and rear children, but also to help in the fields and to process
the raw commodities of the farm" (Rural Life 5). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Firstly, there are Mr. and Mrs. Peters who reside in town, surrounded by multifarious people. Mr.
Peters was a sheriff by occupations and Mrs. Peters was a housewife. Throughout the story the
dynamics of this urban couple are uncovered. They are depicted as a well–to–do pair, without many
apparent issues in their marriage. This could potentially be due to them being on urban couple;
living in a city surrounded by friends, who would be checking in on them frequently to ensure
everything was as it should be. The two other couples, the Hales and the Wrights, were farmers who
lived in a rural community taking care of their crops. Mrs. Hale was a housewife intent on keeping
their home in order and Mr. Hale was an impatience farmer always urging his wife to keep up.
Glaspell writes about a scene where the Hales are heading out with the Peters and Mr. Hale
exclaims, "'Martha!' now came her husband's impatient voice. 'Don't keep folks waiting out here in
the cold'" (Glaspell 3). This rural couple is portrayed as one that is somewhat rough around the
edges. They don't appear to have it all together. Finally, the Wrights are another urban couple in the
short story. This couple is portrayed in a disheveled state, with their marital issue being apparent, but
only talked about in hushed tones. In the story Mrs. Hale mentions that she

A Jury Of Her Peers Essay
"A Jury of Her Peers" by Alfred Hitchcock
Alfred Hitchcock uses dramatic and verbal irony to explain women's powerful intuition compared to
men's analytical skills. Gender differences are presented in a dramatic manner. Further, the short
film explains the differences in gender character's present in the society (Leitch, 18). For instance,
men appear to have an arrogant feeling of superiority against women. This is highly evident in the
society we live in because there are high levels of gender inequality. Moreover, women in the story
act in solidarity–resisting men's act of superiority. This brings the theme of feminism creatively in
the film.
The short film by Hitchcock is adapted from Susan Glaspell's play. However, the short film brings ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She requested for clothes in jail and I wondered which clothes would make her feel most
comfortable. She is a farm lady she needs an outfit that will suit her simple status. The men leading
the investigations have no appreciation for the women in the house. They are all over looking for
evidence, and they evidently do not need our support. They must be underestimating the power of
women. As the investigations are underway, I am left thinking to myself what kind of a man was
Winnie's husband. He was a man of dignity because he did not drink like other men. But he was
silent and he kept most thinks to himself, Winnie must have been bored by her husband's antisocial

Comparing Trifles 'And A Jury Of Her Peers'
A Comparison between "Trifles" and "A Jury of Her Peers" Susan Keating Glaspell was an
American playwright, novelist, journalist and actress. She was born July 1, 1876, in Davenport,
Iowa. To most readers Susan Glaspell (1876–1948) is still known primarily as the author of Trifles,
the frequently anthologized, classic feminist play about two women's secret discovery of a wife's
murder of her husband, or the short–story "A Jury of Her Peers," a re–writing of that piece. "Trifles"
and "A Jury of Her Peers" are extremely similar to one another in almost every respect. Much of the
dialogue is lifted directly from the play and placed into the short story. Additionally, all of the plot
points are the same, with some insignificant differences. An ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The male characters add to these social rules and expectations with a more personalized form of
oppression: by belittling individual women for their weaknesses and their interests. Mr. Peters
mocks his own wife's fear of traveling to the home that is the scene of a murder. The men repeatedly
say that the items in the kitchen, or the items Mrs. Wright has requested in prison, are below their
notice. In this way, the men devalue the women by devaluing the only things that have been left to
the control of women. In many ways, Mrs. Peters and Martha Hale accept the treatment they receive
from the male characters. In fact, they contribute to the gender roles by believing certain things are
only the men's responsibility, such as finding serious evidence. Over the course of the story, though,
the women are able to acknowledge their situation to themselves and to each other. They are united
by Minnie's predicament because they see that they each have experienced the loneliness, isolation,
and mistreatment that led her to kill her husband. In recognizing their shared experience through
Minnie's tragic dilemma, the women begin to see themselves as part of a group of all women, and
they are unwilling to judge another women who experienced the same subjugation. In concealing
the evidence of Minnie's motive, the dead bird, the women stand up against the oppression they've
experienced by creating a

Trifles And A Jury Of Her Peers Analysis
The bond between women can be unbreakable. Susan Glaspell's "Trifles" and "A Jury of Her Peers"
show how two women overlooked can find all the pieces to a missing puzzle but decide on there
own justice; silence. If you break down the word trifles it means something of little value. When
Hale stated, "Well, women are used to worrying over trifles" (Glaspell 1040). That was a shot at
woman saying they are always worrying over nothing and from that point on it was as if the mindset
had changed in both women. By using the gender strategy to analyze how Mrs. Peter's and Mrs.
Hale knowingly covered up a crime because of the bond and sympathy they each felt for Mrs.
Wright.
The argument in the article "Law, Justice, and Female Revenge in 'Kerfol,' by Edith Wharton, and
Trifles and 'A Jury of Her Peers,' by Susan Glaspell is that "women are not given a fair trial by the
jury of their peers". (Wright) Due to reasoning the peers judging them happen to be all men. Men
will side with men and women will side with women. Men in that time period tended to not feel any
sympathy for woman they believed the woman should be waiting on them hand and foot. Wright
states, "When the women discover a possible motive for the murder, they uncover another possible
interpretation of the facts" (Wright). They don't see it as a murder they see it as ... Show more
Wright. Was it some bond held by the woman of self–knowing? Or possibly they shared empathy
with her because they each had felt the sting of tyranny of men. In Suzy Holstein's essay "Silent
Justice in a Different Key: Glaspell's Trifles" she writes about how the women and men perceive
thing differently in the play and short story. Holstein writes, "Clearly, as several feminist
commentators have noted, the women are able to empathize with Minnie Wright because they share
her experience" (Holstein). An example from the play is when Mrs. Peters

A Jury Of Her Peers Summary

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Divya Watson

More from Divya Watson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

A Jury Of Her Peers Summary