3. Introduction
Increase demand on graphic usage
Graphics: large file size
JPEG compression blocking artifact
Unpopularity of JPEG 2000
Removal of JPEG artifact
4. Approach
Multi Layer Perception
15 inputs (5 x 3)
5 R,G,B gradients of the neighbor pixels
close to the block border
6 outputs (2 x 3)
2 R,G,B different of the original image and
the compressed image on the pixels next to
the block border
6. Approach – cont.
First order polynomial fit
Use the 4 pixels closest to the block
border to estimate the value on the 2
pixels next to the border
Use as a control experiment
7. Approach – cont.
Image quality evaluate by
Human eyes
Peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR)
=
MSE
PSNR
255
log10 10
[ ]
( )2
,
2
),(ˆ),(
MN
yxIyxI
MSE
yx
∑ −
=
9. Experiment & Result – cont.
Expt #1: grayscale image
train and test with the same image
JPEG (0.14 bpp)
PSNR = 41.2044 (dB)
MLP postprocessed
PSNR = 40.2514 (dB)
10. Experiment & Result – cont.
Expt #2: color image
train and test with the same image
JPEG (0.18 bpp)
PSNR = 38.2464 (dB)
MLP postprocessed
PSNR = 37.9718 (dB)
11. Experiment & Result – cont.
Expt #3: grayscale image
train with a high bpp image, test with a low bpp image
JPEG (0.085 bpp)
PSNR = 39.5696 (dB)
MLP postprocessed
PSNR = 39.6552 (dB)
12. Experiment & Result – cont.
Expt #4: color image
train with a high bpp image, test with a low bpp image
Training JPEG image bit rate = 0.374 bpp
JPEG (0.065 bpp)
PSNR = 37.4064 (dB)
MLP postprocessed
PSNR = 37.3664 (dB)
13. Experiment & Result – cont.
Expt #5:
train with a high bpp grayscale image,
test with a low bpp color image
Training JPEG image bit rate = 0.255 bpp
JPEG (0.065 bpp)
PSNR = 37.4064 (dB)
MLP postprocessed
PSNR = 37.4312 (dB)
14. Experiment & Result – cont.
Expt #6:
train with a high bpp color image,
test with a low bpp grayscale image
Training JPEG image bit rate = 0.255 bpp
JPEG (0.085 bpp)
PSNR = 39.5696 (dB)
MLP postprocessed
PSNR = 39.125 (dB)
15. Conclusion
MLP can decrease blocking artifact
from experiment #3
High quality image training data is
needed
Current MLP structure does not suit
color image training data
Further Study on the MLP structure
for color image
17. References
W. B. Pennebaker and J. L. Mitchell, (1992) JPEG Still
Image Compression Standard. New York: Van Nostrand
Reinhold.
Martin Boliek, Charilaos Christopoulos, Eric Majani,
(2000) JPEG 2000 Image Coding System, ISO/IEC
JTCI/SC29 WGI, http://www.jpeg.org/CDs15444.html
Guoping Qiu, (2000) MLP for Adaptive Postprocessing
Block-Coded Images. IEEE Transactions On Circuits And
Systems For Video Technology, Vol. 10, No. 8,
December 2000