Developing Leaders
Mr. David Heath
Monday 11th July
Presentation Outline and Structure
Personal
areas for
development
- Theory
- SC
Gap
Data -
International
National
Biddulph
Causes &
consequences
Solutions and
next steps
Personal Areas for Development
Belbin’s Team Roles
Strengths Development
Evaluation
Delegate more
Avoid conflict
less
Be less detail
orientated
Increase
impact outside
classroom
Consider
‘bigger picture’
more Personal
Success
Criteria
Personal Areas for Development
Strengths
Areas for
Development
Gender Gap in Literacy Proficiency
Why do boys often
underperform in reading
and writing when
compared to girls?
What can schools can
do to close this
gender gap?
Phase 1 - Research
Reports
Data
Strategies used in
other schools
Implementation
International Context
• An international PISA survey in 2012 reported that
15-year-old boys were more to be low-achievers in
school.
Morgan says:
‘rate our success by PISA’
• Source: schoolsweek.co.uk
• Feb 27th 2016
• Triennial results
• 2015 results not available
National Context
• In England, the mean score for boys was 487
and for girls was 512.
• A difference of 25 points (40 points =
approximately 1 year of school)
• Girls make much more progress with literacy
and reading (7 ½ months) and so achieve
more in literacy-based subjects.
National Context
• The higher attainment of girls in
reading is a common pattern seen
in National Curriculum tests in
England.
• It is also found in other
international surveys such as the
‘Progress in International Reading
and Literacy Study’ (PIRLS).
• Boys education ‘ignored by Government policy’, warns Ucas chief
• Category: In the News
• Author: The Telegraph
• Posted on January 6, 2016
• Number of white working class boys taking AS or A-levels ‘shockingly low’
• Category: In the News
• Author: The Guardian
• Posted on November 12, 2015
• White working class boys from poor neighbourhoods unlikely to do A-levels
• Category: Press releases
• Author: Sutton Trust
• Posted on November 12, 2015
• Poor white boys are bottom of the class
• Category: In the News
• Author: The Times
• Posted on October 30, 2015
National Context
School Context
SISRA
• Y10 - KS2 prior attainment in reading average score
= 4.72 for girls and 4.52 for boys
• Y9 - KS2 prior attainment in reading average score
= 4.63 for girls and 4.59 for boys
Phase 1 - Research
Reports
Data
Strategies used in
other schools
Implementation
Meta Data
Phase 2 - Implementation
Barrier: Action Taken: Project S.C.:
i) Many
teachers have a
limited
knowledge of
contemporary
and attractive
texts for boys.
- Gary Wilson
- Meeting with
R. Mullen
- Orders
- Circulated list
of new books
for boys to
Progress Tutors
- Display
Delegate more
Increase impact
outside the
classroom
Inspiring others
Phase 2 - Implementation
Barrier: Action Taken: Project S.C.:
ii) Boys tend not
to value learning
and reading as a
mark of success.
- ‘Why Read?’
video sent to Y9
and Y10
Progress Tutors.
- Created
‘Benefits of
Reading’ PP and
distributed to
Progress Tutors.
Delegate more
Increase impact
outside the
classroom
Inspiring others
Benefits of Reading
Phase 2 - Implementation
Barrier: Action Taken: Project S.C.:
iii) At home, girls
are more likely to
be bought books
and taken to the
library than boys,
and mothers are
more likely to
support and role-
model reading for
their children than
fathers.
- Display of male
role models
- PP had
recommendations
by male staff.
- Letter where
fathers (and
mothers) are
encourage to
become more
active as reading
role-models.
Increase impact
outside the classroom
Consider ‘bigger
picture’ more
Recommended by
Mr Murray
Phase 3 – Accelerated Reader
• Electronic system tracking who is reading what
• Motivational reading practice quizzes
Increase impact
outside the
classroom
Future focus
Inspiring others
Consider ‘bigger
picture’ more
Delegate more
Increase impact
outside the
classroom
Future focus
Inspiring others
Consider ‘bigger
picture’ more
Delegate more
Be less detail oriented
Delegate more
Avoid conflict
less
Be less detail
orientated
Increase
impact outside
classroom
Consider
‘bigger picture’
more Personal
Success
Criteria
Future focus
Inspiring others
Impact and influence
The Boys’ Reading Commission
• The Boys’ Reading Commission has found that boys’
underachievement in reading is associated with the interplay of
three factors:
• The home and family environment, where girls are more likely to
be bought books and taken to the library, and where mothers are
more likely to support and role model reading;
• The school environment, where teachers may have a limited
knowledge of contemporary and attractive texts for boys and
where boys may not be given the opportunity to develop their
identity as a reader through experiencing reading for enjoyment;
• Male gender identities which do not value learning and reading as
a mark of success.
Accelerated Reader
Findings of the Education Endowment Foundation
research
AR produces “particularly positive effects” according to an
independent study by the Education Endowment
Foundation (EEF) and Durham University.
“The internet-based programme increased the reading
age of pupils by three additional months in just 22 weeks.
The effect on low-income pupils was even greater, with
their reading age improving by five additional months in
the same amount of time.”
• Have you considered the risks of focusing
only on boys’ reading?
The risks of focusing on boys’ reading
• We must also be careful not to disadvantage girls who
struggle with reading. However, existing research and the
findings of this commission suggest that approaches that
effectively support boys are equally girl-friendly. They are
perhaps better thought of as quality teaching.
• Boys are not a homogenous group; they are not all failing. In
focusing on this issue there is a danger that we can
overemphasise and make it a self-fulfilling prophecy;
arguments that imply boys are not expected to be good or
enthusiastic readers are simply reinforcing it as a social norm.
• However, the long-term impacts of low literacy have such a
massive influence on future life chances that we feel it is our
responsibility to address the issue and unpick the evidence.

Developing Leaders Presentation

  • 1.
    Developing Leaders Mr. DavidHeath Monday 11th July
  • 2.
    Presentation Outline andStructure Personal areas for development - Theory - SC Gap Data - International National Biddulph Causes & consequences Solutions and next steps
  • 3.
    Personal Areas forDevelopment Belbin’s Team Roles Strengths Development Evaluation
  • 5.
    Delegate more Avoid conflict less Beless detail orientated Increase impact outside classroom Consider ‘bigger picture’ more Personal Success Criteria
  • 6.
    Personal Areas forDevelopment Strengths Areas for Development
  • 7.
    Gender Gap inLiteracy Proficiency Why do boys often underperform in reading and writing when compared to girls? What can schools can do to close this gender gap?
  • 8.
    Phase 1 -Research Reports Data Strategies used in other schools Implementation
  • 9.
    International Context • Aninternational PISA survey in 2012 reported that 15-year-old boys were more to be low-achievers in school.
  • 10.
    Morgan says: ‘rate oursuccess by PISA’ • Source: schoolsweek.co.uk • Feb 27th 2016 • Triennial results • 2015 results not available
  • 11.
    National Context • InEngland, the mean score for boys was 487 and for girls was 512. • A difference of 25 points (40 points = approximately 1 year of school) • Girls make much more progress with literacy and reading (7 ½ months) and so achieve more in literacy-based subjects.
  • 12.
    National Context • Thehigher attainment of girls in reading is a common pattern seen in National Curriculum tests in England. • It is also found in other international surveys such as the ‘Progress in International Reading and Literacy Study’ (PIRLS).
  • 13.
    • Boys education‘ignored by Government policy’, warns Ucas chief • Category: In the News • Author: The Telegraph • Posted on January 6, 2016 • Number of white working class boys taking AS or A-levels ‘shockingly low’ • Category: In the News • Author: The Guardian • Posted on November 12, 2015 • White working class boys from poor neighbourhoods unlikely to do A-levels • Category: Press releases • Author: Sutton Trust • Posted on November 12, 2015 • Poor white boys are bottom of the class • Category: In the News • Author: The Times • Posted on October 30, 2015 National Context
  • 14.
    School Context SISRA • Y10- KS2 prior attainment in reading average score = 4.72 for girls and 4.52 for boys • Y9 - KS2 prior attainment in reading average score = 4.63 for girls and 4.59 for boys
  • 15.
    Phase 1 -Research Reports Data Strategies used in other schools Implementation
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Phase 2 -Implementation Barrier: Action Taken: Project S.C.: i) Many teachers have a limited knowledge of contemporary and attractive texts for boys. - Gary Wilson - Meeting with R. Mullen - Orders - Circulated list of new books for boys to Progress Tutors - Display Delegate more Increase impact outside the classroom Inspiring others
  • 19.
    Phase 2 -Implementation Barrier: Action Taken: Project S.C.: ii) Boys tend not to value learning and reading as a mark of success. - ‘Why Read?’ video sent to Y9 and Y10 Progress Tutors. - Created ‘Benefits of Reading’ PP and distributed to Progress Tutors. Delegate more Increase impact outside the classroom Inspiring others
  • 21.
  • 24.
    Phase 2 -Implementation Barrier: Action Taken: Project S.C.: iii) At home, girls are more likely to be bought books and taken to the library than boys, and mothers are more likely to support and role- model reading for their children than fathers. - Display of male role models - PP had recommendations by male staff. - Letter where fathers (and mothers) are encourage to become more active as reading role-models. Increase impact outside the classroom Consider ‘bigger picture’ more
  • 25.
  • 27.
    Phase 3 –Accelerated Reader • Electronic system tracking who is reading what • Motivational reading practice quizzes Increase impact outside the classroom Future focus Inspiring others Consider ‘bigger picture’ more Delegate more
  • 28.
    Increase impact outside the classroom Futurefocus Inspiring others Consider ‘bigger picture’ more Delegate more Be less detail oriented
  • 29.
    Delegate more Avoid conflict less Beless detail orientated Increase impact outside classroom Consider ‘bigger picture’ more Personal Success Criteria Future focus Inspiring others Impact and influence
  • 31.
    The Boys’ ReadingCommission • The Boys’ Reading Commission has found that boys’ underachievement in reading is associated with the interplay of three factors: • The home and family environment, where girls are more likely to be bought books and taken to the library, and where mothers are more likely to support and role model reading; • The school environment, where teachers may have a limited knowledge of contemporary and attractive texts for boys and where boys may not be given the opportunity to develop their identity as a reader through experiencing reading for enjoyment; • Male gender identities which do not value learning and reading as a mark of success.
  • 32.
    Accelerated Reader Findings ofthe Education Endowment Foundation research AR produces “particularly positive effects” according to an independent study by the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) and Durham University. “The internet-based programme increased the reading age of pupils by three additional months in just 22 weeks. The effect on low-income pupils was even greater, with their reading age improving by five additional months in the same amount of time.”
  • 33.
    • Have youconsidered the risks of focusing only on boys’ reading?
  • 34.
    The risks offocusing on boys’ reading • We must also be careful not to disadvantage girls who struggle with reading. However, existing research and the findings of this commission suggest that approaches that effectively support boys are equally girl-friendly. They are perhaps better thought of as quality teaching. • Boys are not a homogenous group; they are not all failing. In focusing on this issue there is a danger that we can overemphasise and make it a self-fulfilling prophecy; arguments that imply boys are not expected to be good or enthusiastic readers are simply reinforcing it as a social norm. • However, the long-term impacts of low literacy have such a massive influence on future life chances that we feel it is our responsibility to address the issue and unpick the evidence.

Editor's Notes

  • #11 http://schoolsweek.co.uk/morgan-says-rate-our-success-by-pisa-but-is-it-a-swizz/