The Short, Savage Life of a Civil War Guerrilla

The Short, Savage Life of A Civil War Guerrilla by Albert...
The most deadly and violent war in history also known as the civil war, belongs to the United States
of America. Not only was this war the bloodiest war in history but it help shape and develop some
of the most gruesome and ferocious men. Bloody Bill Anderson was one of these men, who
viciously fought in the civil war for the south. His extreme passion for slavery and war was proven
numerous times as he and his ruffian's murdered, demolished, and destroyed towns and villages in
Missouri and Kansas. In Bloody Bill Anderson: The Short, Savage Life of a Civil War Guerrilla,
Albert Castel and Thomas Goodrich provide a look at the "real war" by describing a gritty, brutally
realistic portrait of William Anderson, and his malicious acts to protect what he believed. In this
review I will look at the life of William "Bloody Bill" Anderson and what shaped and made him the
most vicious, ruthless man in guerilla war fare in the civil war and how he fought till the very end. I
will also look further into him and his jay hawkers in terms of the destruction and gruesome acts
that took against Union troops and those in support to abolish slavery. The book begins by a private
on sentry duty just on the outskirts of Fayette, Missouri. This private felt a certain uneasiness about
that day, however and those instincts or intuition just happened to be right; an attack on Fayette by
bushwhackers believed to be led by non–other than Bloody Bill himself. "Bushwhackers were not
soldiers, at least
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Boston Massacre: The Cause Of The Revolutionary War
It was a bloody scene.Starting from the name itself, this landmark event of the American Revolution
proved to be a magnet for popular myths and misconceptions.It was not called the "The Boston
Massacre" until many years after it occurred in 1773. The first popular name popularized by Paul
Revere was The Bloody Massacre in King Street. In the early 1800's it was also called the State
Street Massacre. In many history books the dramatic shooting is described as the spark that ignited
the Revolutionary War. Perhaps one of the reasons is the loss of human lives. In reality there were
several other historic milestones although less dramatic, that moved Boston towards the revolution.
Townshend Acts, Stamp Act and Boston Tea Party were

ember World War II, and the effects it caused around the...
ember World War II, and the effects it caused around the world, especially to the Jewish People.
During that time the Nazi's were killing off Jewish people, and sending them to concentration or
work camps to be eventually killed off or worked till they are almost dead. People called it the
holocaust, and it was the genocide of the Jewish. Genocide is one of the worst things in the world
today, as it injured and killed many people. It is referred to having malicious intent of destroying or
hurting a specific group. The word "Genocide" is derived from the Greek word "Geno–"which is
Greek for race or tribe, while the Latin word "–Cide" means killing. This word was created by a
Polish–Jewish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin in the year 1944. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The killing of members within a group, causing serious injury or mental destruction, in some or
whole parts of destruction, also preventing birth within that group, or transferring the people or
children on to another group. There were many Genocides throughout history, including the
Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, and the Chinese Genocide, etc. Overall, Genocide is one of the
worst and inhumane crimes in the history of mankind, as it killed off many, many people. In April
1915 the Ottoman government decided to diminish the civilian Armenian Population. The
persecutions were varying, as it was on a curve with high intensity until 1923. In 1923, the Ottoman
Empire was gone from existence, and was replaced by the Republic of Turkey. The Armenian
population in 1915 was about two million, and by 1918, about 1 million people have died, while
hundreds of thousands had become homeless and stateless refugees. By the year 1923, the Armenian
population of Anatolian Turkey was gone. The Ottoman Empire was controlled and led by the
Turks. The Turks had conquered and seized lands from across West Asian, North Africa, and
Southeast Europe. While the overall Ottoman government was controlled in Istanbul
(Constantinople), and was headed by a sultan who wanted absolute power. The Armenian people
were a Christian minority, and lived as second class citizens. They had legal restrictions that denied
them from normal safeguards. They did not live in

Rhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of...
Award winning novelist, Holocaust survivor, human rights activist, Elie Wiesel in his influential
speech, ' The Perils of Indifference," emphasizes that indifference is a tempting yet inhumane
quality that affects the success our new centuries to come. He develops this message by looking
back upon the horrific memories of his Holocaust experience as well as looking back upon the
countless assassinations, and wars that have created this " dark shadow over humanity." The
memories of being "liberated" by "American Soldiers" cause him to see the pain and suffrage of
many but allow him to have "gratitude" towards the "American People." Wiesel mentions how
indifference is "seductive" and "tempting" because it is the easier to not be involved in another
person's "pain and despair." Wiesel's purpose is to warn readers about the corruption of indifference
in order to influence change in the new centuries to come. He creates a critical tone for readers by
using stylistic devices and rhetorical devices such as imagery, repetition, and pathos in order to truly
develop his message that inhumanity and indifference are very similar things that affect us in the
same way.
As we look into the Srebrenica Genocide of 1995, what Wiesel conveys in his speech, "The Perils of
Indifference" becomes clearer and more relevant than ever. Wiesel makes it clear that indifference is
capable of causing inhumanity because we find it so much easier to ignore "another person's pain
and despair" as long as it doesn't interrupt our life. In just a month 8,000 Bosnians were killed, this
became known as the Srebrenica Genocide. The world did not react. The Srebrenica Genocide,
which occured in 1995, caused the death of approximately over 100,000 people. This was the
beginning of the "ethnic cleansings that characterized the atrocities of the Yugoslav wars." (The
Bosnian War) The world was just watching, they wanted " to avoid the moral responsibilities of
responding to a genocide" so they chose to think of it as an "ethnic cleansing" rather than a
"genocide." (The Bosnian War) This horrible act of inhumanity is a result of indifference, it has
been one of the worst act of genocides since the nazis' destruction of over 6 million Jews during
World

The Battle Of Saratoga And Indian War
Boom! Boom! Boom! Do you hear that? That's what led to the revolution. Some events that led to
the revolution are: The French and Indian War, The Battle of Saratoga and many other events. The
American Revolution was between the Americans led by George Washington , and the British led by
General Howe and General Cornwallis. The two enemies have been fighting for several of years.
There are series of wars that led to the revolution. These series if wars lasted for several of years
also. This is were the war begins. The Navigation Act was passed between 1650 and 1696. It limited
colonial trade by using the system of merchantalism. It forbade colonist from trading specific items
such as sugar and cotton. The colonist reactions were different though. They would end up
protesting about the unfair taxes, and requirements they were expected to follow under the act.
England responded to these protest by saying it would benefit everyone because there was was a
steady market for these goods in England. Not all colonist agreed. Some resorted to smuggling
items in and out of the colonies because of the way the British were treating them. Do you know
what the French and Indian war was over? The war was between the British and French over the fur
trade. The trade smacked the British and the colonist right in the face. Prime Minister, George
Grenville, asked parliament to pass higher taxes on the colonies to pay for the war debt and
protection. Colonist believed that

The American Massacre : The Causes Of The Boston Massacre
What happened on March 5, 1770? The Boston Massacre happened. Many of the colonist had just
lost their jobs so they gathered around together. The colonist were not happy that they had lost their
jobs most of the colonists were furious. A seventeen year old boy who was an apprentice had
stepped out of his group and was screaming at the British that's when it happen. A British soldier
had hit the seventeen–year old apprentice that's when the crowd went wild and started to fight with
the British. The British soldiers had fired their guns. There were five colonists who were dead. The
first man to be shot was an African American man. Paul Revere had seen what the British had done
so he wrote a poster and called it the Bloody Massacre. After that had happened in Boston with the
British soon after the other colonists heard about it as well.The British did not know that what they
had done was the beginning of the war and they had started. (Miller & Perry,2017) (American
Revolution, 2010). September 5,1774, that is when the first continental meeting was. Each colony
was getting guns secretly and hiding them because they didn't want the British to know that they had
weapons also because they were preparing for a war with the British. Each town had started a militia
every person who joined the militia under went training. They were taught to fire a gun. Once the
British had heard each colony had there own milta they went to stop them. Once it was dark the
British soldiers headed out of Boston to go to the colonies and end there militia's. Paul Revere hears
about the British going so he gets on a horse riding to each colony telling them the British are
coming. In September 5, 1775, the battle of Lexington and Concord. The militia group had heard the
British were coming so they got their weapons and were ready to meet the British. There was sixty–
men who met with the British. Nobody knows who fired the first shot. Among the soldiers there
were African American men fighting with us. The militiamen were not as good as the British.The
British fired more than the colonists of Lexington and Concord. Eight patriots were dead ten were
wounded. We had lost the first battle of Lexington and Concord. The British wanted to

1972 Munich Olympics Essay
Introduction: The modern world is constantly reaching for new information; something to distract
people from their own dull lives. Society will believe nearly anything that is presented in a news
article, no matter how absurd. 'Breaking news' seems to be shared constantly and is readily available
at any given moment. Nevertheless, this rapid swarm of new stories and facts begs the question –
how reliable are these news outlets that are providing coverage of events around the world? Do
news sources invest time and work into their reports, or do they release reports teeming with bias
and unproven facts solely for money and satisfactory ratings? The massacre at the 1972 Munich
Olympics shocked the world and its citizens, and newspapers ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
On August 3, 2016, three days prior to the start of the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio, the
International Olympic Committee honored the fallen athletes for the first time since the massacre.
Treatment by Media Source 1: The New York Times
Origination of issue: Binder, David. "A 23–Hour Drama ." The New York Times , 6 Sept. 1972.: The
headline stands out from the rest of the article, for it provokes sensitivity in the readers. Bias by
emphasis is exemplified as the writer continually includes details about the evil motives of the
Arabs, showing the left–leaning value of community based on ethics. Rather than simply stating
Palestinian involvement, the article specifically mentions the "invasion of the Olympic Village by
the Arabs", targeting the Arabs. The usage of phrases like "armed with automatic rifles", "broke
into", and "seized" once again point out the nefariousness of the Arabs. The repetition of German
involvement in the negotiations with the Arabs emphasizes that society is a support system, and
begins to examine the impact on society. As is typical of left–leaning reports, the New York Times
next delves into how the attack interfered with society by reporting that "the bloodbath...ended at 1
A.M...after long hours of negotiation between German and Arabs at the Israeli quarters in the
Olympic Village" and "[a] Boeing–707 provided by the Lufthansa German Airlines was waiting".
By consistently

The Genocide Of The Holocaust
Genocide
Genocide a word that brings forth the morbid image of barbed wire fences, trenches overflowing
with bodies, malnourished men, women, and children, a depressing black sky. Genocides definition
is "the deliberate killing of people who belong to a particular racial, political, or cultural group"
(Merriam–Webster.com) True to its name genocide is a word that has the ability to cause war and
leaves a hellish vision in its victims. Despite all of this the seemingly impossibility it is possible to
solve and end genocide. And although it is seen as a dreadful plague and world powers should focus
partially on ending this catastrophe.
The word genocide was invented by Raphael Lemkin in 1944 to describe the horrors and crimes of
the Der NationalSozialisten or Nazi party. The Holocaust Brought forth a new level of horror almost
unthinkable at the time, thus leaving a deep scar in many people and the world. Still haunting the
world to this day the Holocaust gave the crime of genocide it 's name and sadly crimes like it
continued throughout the 20th century.
Even worse genocides have happened, after Hitler and his regime fell. Josef Stalin of course and his
killing of over 30 million of his own people. Then Mao Zedong who makes Hitler appear as a
playground bully with his killing of around 80 million of his own countrymen to make way for
communist China. Now to a more recent genocide, the killing of the Yazidi and other peoples by
I.S.I.S. (

The Bosnian-Herzegovina Genocide And Ethnic Cleanse
Introduction
The Bosnian–Herzegovina genocide or "ethnic cleansing" went on from April 1992 to December
1995 around the end of the Second World War. When Bosnia became its own independent nation on
April 5th 1922 it wanted to "cleanse" its country of any non Serbian residents. The killing of
Bosnian Muslims during this time was stated by international tribunals to be an ethnic cleansing
however the events that took place in July 1995 in Srebrenica was so horrific it was deemed a
genocide. The United Nations should have intervened a lot sooner than they did and should have
sent more than just peace keepers to protect the human beings that were being slaughtered.
Victims
The victims targeted during the Bosnian–Herzegovina genocide were mostly Bosnian Muslims and
Croatians. The majority of the people that were being murdered and executed were male (boys and
men), while the women were being raped and tortured. The downfall of the Ottoman Empire gave a
rise to the thoughts of nationalism which in turn caused the ethno religious (an ethnic group whose
members are also unified by a common religious background) in Bosnia to have clashing issues like
historical problems between groups and political issues. The three different groups which were
living in Bosnia were obviously Bosnians but also Serbians and Croatians.
According to a demographic study issued in 2005 by the International Criminal Tribunal for the
former Yugoslavia, some 97.1 percent of the 7,661 persons recorded as

The Great Cat Massacre Analysis
Overall, the argument of The Great Cat Massacre was that a historian could use the writings of a
particular point in history to determine the psychology of the people of that time. In this case, it was
of the French people in the decades before the French Revolution. Like Natalie Zemon Davis,
Darnton claimed he had the ability to know the mental landscape of the people he studied,
understanding their motives based on the few words that were placed before him. But is this
determination of a people's mindset possible? How much of the cat massacre was Darnton's
thoughts and beliefs and how much were of the people he was studying? The truth is that there is no
way of knowing what is history and what is Darnton's perception of history. Like Davis, Darnton ran
the fine line of telling history as it was, and using that history to support his own beliefs and
opinions, and the critics, as before, had a problem with this practice.
Roger Chartier, in his article "Text, Symbols, and Frenchness," began his argument with the belief
that Darnton gave the incident of the cat massacre too many levels of meaning. How could this one
act be a statement about the treatment of the workers, the practice of witchcraft, the cuckolding of a
husband, and a critique of the new lifestyles of the masters all at one time? Chartier starts his
argument against this interpretation by criticizing Darnton's use of a modern definition of "symbol."
Chartier believed that, "anyone concerned primarily with

Oversexualization Of Women In Society
The sexualization of young girls and women in society is a prevalent theme in mass media.
Presently, the sexualization of females is commonly seen in various consumer items like clothes,
dolls, and even in Disney movies, according to "The Sexualization of Girls Is Harmful" article. The
author says that sexualization occurs when "a person's value comes only from his or her sexual
appeal or behavior; a person is held to a standard that equates physical attractiveness with being
sexy; a person is sexually objectified– made into a thing for others' sexual use; and sexuality is
inappropriately imposed upon a person (AboutKidsHealth)." Furthermore, the author provides
statistics on how girls are being sexualized by the products they see and use ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The development of visual media has introduced the concept of The Male Gaze Theory. The Male
Gaze Theory is defined as how women are depicted in the media from a male perspective, such as
presenting women as sexual objects for men's pleasure (Loreck). The article, inexplicitly, talks about
the male gaze: "Up to 81% of music videos contain sexual imagery, the majority of which sexually
objectifies women by presenting them in revealing clothing, as decorative sexual objects, dancing
sexually, or in ways that emphasize body parts or sexual readiness." The article talks about how
women are sexually presented in the media which is what the male gaze encompasses the "male
gaze" is a harmful contribution to the sexualization of girls and is also seen throughout the music
video. The beginning of the music video shows 50 Cent walking into a brothel–type mansion where
the camera pans to focusing on the writhing, half–naked women in the foyer of the mansion. This
scene is viewed from a male's perspective because the camera focuses on their sensual movements
and physical assets instead of their normal facial expressions or more appropriate places on their
body. Also, since 50 Cent is the only male in the mansion, the camera is only coming from a male
perspective because brothels are only truly for a male's pleasure. The other women in the video are
objectified from their revealing clothing

Causes Of The Boston Massacre
With revolution on the rise and independence in colonist minds, it starts to be clear that the
definition of American is becoming more evident in British minds. With the first few acts such as
the Stamp Acts, Quartering Acts, Tea Act, and etc., the British had placed on the colonists, the sense
of patriotism becomes more common in all Americans. But the event of the Boston Massacre, which
had troops of British soldiers fire upon a crowd of colonists, boosted the idea of freedom and
furthered the hate of Britain by the colonists. This occurrence, although tragic, did help the colonists
unite together and aided the revolution. It is unclear which side, colonists or the British, stimulated
it into happening. However, I believe that the Americans are the ones to blame for this tragic event.
The whole occurrence had the British holding the guns and shooting at the colonists but I feel that
the colonists stimulated this affair. In different accounts of the massacre, it is stated that the
colonists taunted the redcoats. Additionally, this protest was the result of the mercantilistic acts
British imposed.
The Boston Massacre initially started as an argument in Boston's customs house. However, tensions
grew and finally the protests became more violent and the bullets flew into the crowd. In differing
reports of this event, many of them state that something was thrown into one of the soldiers
prompting the firing. According to Thomas Preston (Doc 2), the Captain of the troopers in

Essay on The Townshed Act and the Boston Massacre
The Townshend Act and the Boston Massacre
Whenever the colonies were being established there were always issues, much like today. They
worried about over taxation, jobs, money, their children, and many other things. Things haven't
really changed other than some of our morals. Back in the 1770's many men in power were selfish
and cared for nothing but money. Granted, some people make the argument that America is still that
way, but we know it's not all true. Way back when, America was still mainly ruled by England, any
war that England fought in, America paid the price. These men in positions of power would force
Americans to pay overbearing taxes to cover the debts of wars and even sometimes just to get
money from them. So, here's how ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5th, 1770 whenever a group of American colonists who
called themselves 'The Protestors' started an uprising at the Customs House. The Protestors
instigated this Massacre by having taunted the British soldiers until one Protestor threw a snowball
and hit Private Hugh Montgomery. Once he was hit he opened fire on the unarmed colonists and his
fellow soldiers followed in his malicious shoes. In all, they killed five colonists, Crispius Attucks,
Patrick Carr, Samuel Gray, Samuel Maverick, and James Caldwell, and left 3 colonists injured. The
trial for the soldiers ended in December of 1770 where they were all found guilty of manslaughter
and their punishment was to have their thumbs branded with an 'M' for murderer. This massacre
made many people consider the thought of freedom and some voiced this thought. The Sons of
Liberty advertised this massacre as a doorway to battle for American Liberty ("The Boston
Massacre."). Both of these events played large roles in the start of The Revolutionary War. The
colonists saw that England was oppressing them and didn't want them to be independent. The
colonists saw that England would do about anything to make sure that they were in control of
America and the colonists. Whenever the Townshend act ended the colonists knew it wouldn't be the
end of over taxation or violent murders. The Boston Massacre showed the colonists that the English
don't care who they hurt as long

What Did The Tlatelolco Massacre Affect Mexico Politically...
Candidate personal code: gdg892 To What Extent did the Tlatelolco Massacre Affect Mexico
Politically and Socially? Section 1: Identification and Evaluation of Sources (347 Words) The
question that will be investigated is, to what extent did the Tlatelolco Massacre affect Mexico
politically and socially? To further analyze the question, the use of Sam Dillon's article "Mexico
City Journal; Anniversary of '68 Massacre Brings Facts to Light." was excellent due to the rich
content that it contains as well as Patrick J. McDonnell's article "1968 Massacre in Mexico Still
Echoes across Nation: Activism: Killing of students just before Olympics radically changed country.
And questions continue." Sam Dillon's article "Mexico City Journal; Anniversary of '68 Massacre
Brings Facts to Light." was written on December 1st, 2008 by the National Public Radio. The
purpose of this article is to further analyze what had happened during and after the Tlatelolco
Massacre and it contains a timeline of events and a breakdown of that day. A value that this article
gives is that it has specific details as to what happened during the massacre as well as different
opinions from different nations. Some countries, like the United States, was against what the
government was doing. A limitation is that this article does not explore different viewpoints such as
one from citizens and another from the government which would only give this essay one point of
view. Patrick J. McDonnell's article "1968

The 1972 Munich Olympics Hostage Crisis Essay
September 5, 1972:Violence in the Village A Day That Changed Sports and Its Story in The New
York Times "9 Israelis on Olympic Team Killed With 4 Arab Captors As Police Fight Band That
Disrupted Munich Games," screamed the headline of the front page of The New York Times. The
attack occurred during the wee hours of September 5, 1972, but news of the crisis, although
widespread on television sets across the world, would not reach The New York Times until
September 6. When it did reach the papers, it was clear that something had gone wrong. Very
wrong. The New York Times first reported this event as a mind–boggling screw–up, and in the days
that followed, reported on the manner in which the international community retaliated. In ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An article titled "Gate–Crashing at Village Easy Despite the Guards" states that, "Anyone who
wants to crash the Olympic Village badly enough, as Arab guerrillas did early this morning in search
of Israeli athletes and officials, can succeed without difficulty." Additionally, The New York Times
would report that the guerrillas snuck in weakly disguised as athletes armed with a cache of
weapons in duffle bags. These men, as a diagram of the Olympic Village shows, did not have to go
far to find the Israelis after easily entering the compound. Red Smith, sports editorialist, was livid at
Olympic Organizers for their lack of attention to detail, and due to the fact that the Games continues
until 4:00 PM on the day of the attacks. "The men who run the Olympics are not evil men. Their
shocking lack of awareness can't be due to callousness." He adds, "It has to be stupidity." The New
York Times put security under the microscope on day one of reporting the story, and would continue
to do so for several days. Security was not the only problem under the microscope. sIn an article
titled "Head of U.N. Condemns Raid as a `Dastardly Act'", The New York Times printed a quote
blaming Arab nations for the attack. The quote and others like it seemed to suggest that if the Arab
nations that harbor terrorists were more proactive in eliminating terrorism in their nations, then the
whole conflict could

Similarities And Differences Between Red Jacket And...
Raif
English Comparison Essay
Red Jacket and Olaudah Equiano have different opinions on the people of the United States of
America because they had different roles and were in different situations, they were in different
locations, and they experienced different types of treatment and behavior. Olaudah Equiano was a
captured African from Benin; his home in Western–South Africa. He worked as a slave in Barbados
and Virginia but surprisingly bought his freedom and headed to England to support the British anti–
slavery movement. He learned how to read and write in English while settled in Great Britain. This
led to him writing about his experience of being a slave and all the horrific sights he saw. He wrote
a piece about him being captured and sent to the ship. He talked about his journey, shows the
knowledge, and education he had back then. He wrote about the Americans and what he thought
about them. He also mentions the treatment the Africans were getting. On the other hand, Red
Jacket had the role of a Native American Chief, he was a prominent leader of the Native American
tribe called the Senecas. He, unlike Equiano, wrote about his experience while in the United States
of America. His speech was his weapon to defend the religion he believes in. He uses many useful
points and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Equiano has seen and felt physical torture like whipping and hanging, while Red Jacket experienced
his religion and his people's land being taken away and replaced by another's belief. They both were
dealing with the same types of people, the Americans. To be brief, although Equiano and Red Jacket
had different stories and were living in different circumstances, they both had some similarities in
their experiences. They both saw terrible things that hurt them and their race. They both had to deal
with the domination of Americans trying to take away freedom from Equiano and religion from Red

The Violence Of Gustavo Diaz Ordaz
Gustavo Diaz Ordaz became president of the United States of Mexico in 1964, years before the
massacre, that took place in October 2, 1968 at "la plaza de las Tres Culturas" in Mexico city, better
known as "Tlatelolco Massacre" ("Mexico 's 1968 Massacre"). It was supposed to be an unarmed
peacefull protest, but at sunset the police and military forces equipped with armored cars and tanks
surrounded the plaza and began firing into the open crowd. The police fire hit not only the protestors
but also innocent bystanders.
It all started when the students decided to organize and protest against the violence exerted by the
riot police. During the previous months, Mexico City witnessed a series of student protests and
rallies against repression and violence. ("Mexico 's 1968 Massacre") for example on August 13, a
large demonstration of around 150,000 participants gathered to protest, a protest that ended outside
of the palace of governor. On 13 September the "march of silence "took place, this was a protest of
more than 250,000 people, where they all remained silent to prevent the police put the pretext of
provocation by students ("Movimiento estudiantil de 1968").
This was also lead by student movements that were breaking out all over the world including:
France, Germany, Italy, Czechoslovakia, Argentina, Japan and the United States.
A great deal of evidence seems to support that the person who was responsible for all the damage in
Mexico was the former president Diaz Ordaz. Diaz

Analysis Of The Movie ' The Englishman 's Boy '
The film "The Englishman's boy" is a screen adaptation of Guy Vanderhaeghe's book of the same
name. Vanderhaeghe also wrote the screenplay for the film. The book was based on the true story of
the Cypress Hills massacre in 1873. I will provide a summary of the film's most important plot
points, characters and background information. The movie covers the horrors that were witnessed in
Cypress Hills and shows the inhumane way Native Americans have been treated since colonization,
in 1873 and through to the 1920s. The movie explains how white men were hearkened as heroes for
committing these atrocities which were largely excused because society at that time viewed natives
as inhuman and therefore undeserving of human rights. The film was set with a background in both
1873 pioneer plains and 1920s Hollywood. This method was used to show a dualism within the two
eras and that negative attitudes towards Native Americans had not been corrected as they should
have been but only muffled. I will compare the film and its accuracy to the actual Cypress Hills
massacre and determine what dramatics were used to make a point within the direction of the
movie. This film and the subsequent essay is relevant to this class because I believe that even
though the crimes committed against native Americans are less obviously racist, violent and vulgar
today, there is still a derogatory indifference towards them and their cries for equality.
The film opens in 1873, with a young man working as a

Was The Boston Massacre A Massacre
On March 5, 1770, indignant Boston colonists assembled on King Street, rocketing snowballs and
launching stones at the British soldiers stationed in the English city. The rebels heckled the troops,
threatening them with weapons and ominous declarations, inducing defensive military action by the
British, leading to the deaths of five colonial rebels...Let's try that again.
On March 5, 1770, passionate Boston colonists gathered on King Street to discuss the inequitable,
prejudiced taxes enacted by their tyrannical mother country. The British soldiers embarked on a
fervid rampage, terrorizing the colonial people with hostile words and menacing attacks. The
altercation ended with innocent colonists splattered on the icy ground, the pure snow now stained
with burgundy blood, their frosty bodies pierced with lethal bullets, their brisk breaths reduced to
clouds of death... Much better.
If you were educated in the United States of America, you know the Boston Massacre as the
slaughtering of innocent Patriots fighting for liberty, for justice, for freedom. Yet if you are British,
the Boston Massacre is an irrelevant event in your Civil War. The victors dictate history, therefore,
perspective is skewed and history is fabricated. Because of historical inaccuracy, you were probably
unaware that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre at all; it became a "massacre" through
propaganda, specifically, Paul Revere's engraving, The Bloody Massacre Perpetrated in King Street
and colonial

Summary Of Equiano's 'Middle Passage'
1. Equiano and his sister are kidnapped from their home while their parents are working in the
fields. He is separated from his sister when he is sold into slavery; he later reunites with her for one
night until she is ripped away to be sold again. He is sold to many different owners; the majority of
them had a similar language and culture as his, a few were completely different. On the sea coast
aboard the slave ship, Equiano faints; when Equiano regains consciousness he is forced below the
deck where he is confronted with an unbearable stench and constant crying, he is so sick that he
does not have an appetite and he wishes for death. 2. The "Middle Passage" is described as a grim,
hopeless journey in which the Africans lived in constant

The Engraving Of The Boston Massacre
The engraving of the Boston Massacre mislead people's thoughts about what happened on the said
day. The engraving was considered to be propaganda because it was especially of a biased, and was
used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. The day of the Boston
Massacre rose several questions about what happened and who was at fault. Paul Revere
intentionally changed details about the Boston Massacre in order to influence the decisions of the
Bostonians.
The setting of the Boston Massacre was changed to mislead colonists. The engraving shows a clear
sky, Butcher's Hall and a lack of snow. The engraving shows a clear sky, not with a cloud in sight. In
the far left side of the engraving was a crescent moon. In several documents were witness' who said
the events took place at least after 8 pm. Richard Palmes told investigators, " Between the hours ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If the Boston Massacre was to have taken place in the morning, one could deduce this it was no
accident. This piece of evidence was crucial because if the shooting happened at night rather than in
the morning it would rule out this being accidental. In reality, this event took place around 8 pm
where no one could see specifically what happened. The engraving of the Boston Massacre shows
no signs of precipitation or earlier precipitation. The engraving looks sunny because there are
shadows of the soldiers and colonists. In document 6, General Thomas Gage, Commander of all
British soldiers in Boston states, " The party of soldiers were attacked with bricks, stones, pieces of
ice, and snowballs." This and several other documents wrote, the colonists threw snowballs and
pieces of ice. This was the complete opposite than what the engraving shows. This shows, Paul
Revere poorly showed the climate surrounding the Boston Massacre. Behind the captain in the
engraving was a building called Butcher's Hall and the Customs House. Butcher's Hall was behind
the

Politics in Sports
The Olympic Games are a worldwide competition that brings people of different cultures and
backgrounds into one united area where they compete in their specialized sports. These events,
however, are not purely entertainment like they should have been. Today's societies are more
dependent on politics and therefore so are sports and the athletes competing, sometimes even
without their own will. In various occasions across the world politics was the main reason for
athletes to withdraw from athletic events such as the world cup, Olympics, and any other worldwide
or region wide competitions. On the other hand politics sometimes are the reason that some teams
re–establish themselves and get back into the world scene in sports. This two sided ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Mexico City Olympics in 1968 was a different yet similar incident where racism, closely
related to anti–Semitism in the way society views the rights of people of all races and kinds. United
States athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos, African American males, competed in the 200 meter
race and won first and third place respectively. When they went on the podium the men didn't wear
their shoes revealing black socks, they wore black track uniforms and when were given their medals
they revealed black gloves on their hands while putting their fists in the air as an act of representing
the Black Power movement. Later on the two athletes were banned from the Olympic village
because of their unfit political statement to the apolitical athletic forum the Olympics are supposed
to be. This statement created controversy that again stirred the athletic event away from its task of
entertainment into a worldwide argument. Politics again have been a disruption to the long awaited
athletic event. The Olympic committee had done the right thing by making an example of these
athletes and the committees' long run efforts to exclude politics from worldwide events; however, it
never acted on the Nazi salutes that the Germans used in the Berlin Olympics. Some may argue that
it was their country's national salute, but we all know today that it had a political background behind
it that shouldn't have been ignored. This incident had every sign of discrimination against the
African

In the Lake of the Woods by Tim O'Brien: Theme Analysis...
Tim O'Brien's In the Lake of the Woods is centered around the mysterious disappearance of Kathy
Wade. Mysterious is the key word, as throughout the novel O'Brien plays with the fine line between
ambiguity and reality. Kathy's husband John Wade, the main character, is a Vietnam veteran and
former politician whose participation in the infamous Mai Lai Massacre caused his fall from grace.
Following a landslide defeat in the congressional elections, Kathy and John retreat to solitude in an
isolated cabin in the Minnesota woods. Here, O'Brien highlights the stress that secrecy has had on
their relationship. During their retreat, Kathy disappears in the middle of the night. Their boat is
missing, but there are no other clues. O'Brien does ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
John was terrified of discovering the truth about his father. O'Brien explained that for John, "
[Knowing] is to be disappointed. To understand is to be betrayed." (242) While hiding the truth was
convenient for John, the secrets piled up and ultimately proved to be too much of a burden. For as
hard as John tried to cover up the truth, he always knew about his father's drinking. "That was the
worst part. The secret drinking that wasn't secret," O'Brien explained. (66) When Paul hanged
himself, however, John was finally able to face the truth. He was still a child, and at the funeral he
continually screamed in front of the entire procession, finally relieving himself of the burden of
years of secrecy. While the truth of Paul's alcoholism was not pretty, and was certainly less
convenient to face than simply ignoring it, it was a significant relief for John. His mother explained:
"I hate to say it, but it was a relief to have him out of the house. John and I, we both adored the man,
but suddenly all the tension was gone and we could have supper without sitting there on the edge of
our seats." (97) Throughout the rest of John's life, a similar process of hiding the truth and
ultimately accepting it would repeat. As he progressed to the next stage of his life, as a young adult
serving in the Vietnam War, John would bear a secret much heavier than his father's

The Holocaust And The Bosnian Genocide
The Merriam–Webster Dictionary defines the word "genocide" as "the killing of people who belong
to a particular racial, political, or cultural group" (Merriam). But aren't genocides much more then
that? Over the past hundred years, there have been several attempted genocides around the world.
Two of the most well–known genocides are the Holocaust (the Nazi's attempt to destroy the Jewish
people) and the Bosnian genocide (the Serbians attempt to destroy the Bosnian population). This
paper analyzes a political cartoon relating to genocides, describes the events that led to the
Holocaust and the Bosnian genocide, describes several similarities and differences between them
and explains why genocides continue regardless of the saying, "Never Again". I. Cartoon
Interpretation The cartoon is a commentary about the United Nations unsuccessful efforts to stop
genocide. These efforts began in the 1940s: "Nearly 60 years ago, the international community
made a commitment to put an end to the crime of genocide by ratifying the United Nations
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide."(Hastings) As noted in the
cartoon, however, the United Nations efforts have not succeeded. The cartoon shows a tremendous
amount of skeleton heads. These skeleton heads could refer to all of the people who have been
killed in genocides around the world. It also shows approximately 15 graves above the skeleton
heads. The graves include the names of different places

Boston Massacre Research Paper
Plan of investigation
This investigation will assess the significance of the causes of the Boston Massacre in 1770. It will
also connect the relationship and perspective of British Troops verses the colonists and will study
the effects of the various events that led up to the Massacre. In June 1767, British Parliament
permitted the Townshend Acts which taxed import items such as tea, lead, glass, paint, and paper.
They also constructed a Board of Custom Commissioners for America to be positioned in Boston.
After this, Boston's citizens rioted against the import taxes by creating anti–import movements in
the colonies. The British Army soldiers killed five male civilians and wounded six others. The event
was heavily propagandized by commanding patriots such as Paul Revere and Samuel Adams who
ignited hostility towards the British powers. These events include riots against British taxations such
as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ever since 1768 in the Province of Massachusetts Bay, British troops were enlisted to uphold
specific colonial officials who tried to inflict hated Parliamentary decrees.
Crispus Attucks, a runaway slave was the leader of the attack. The crowd tossed various items
towards the sentry and challenged the soldiers to fire their weapons. Private White Hugh, a soldier,
warned Captain Thomas Preston of the riot, who was the officer of the watch. Preston proclaimed
that he posted six privates of the 29th Regiment and an officer to aid White. These Soldiers
included: Corporal William Wemms, Hugh Montgomery, John Carroll, William McCauley, William
Warren, and Matthew Kilroy. When the soldiers went to the customhouse, they spread themselves in
formation. The crowd consistently taunted them and threw snowballs. When something hit Private
Montgomery he told the troops to fire. Although the crowd left the customhouse, they continued to
rise in the streets. [Independence Hall

Compare Contrast Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano Essay
There are various things that make up a piece of literature. For example: choice of diction, modes of
discourse, and figurative language. Mary Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano were great examples of
authors that used these elements of literature. There are similarities and differences in A Narrative of
the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson and From Africa to America. Though Mary
Rowlandson and Olaudah Equiano shared similarities in experiences, they had different writing
personalities, purposes, attitudes, tones, and relations with their communities. There are four main
modes of discourse: expository, narrative, descriptive, and persuasive. In Mary Rowlandson's A
Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both narratives are similar in the experiences the two authors possessed. Both Mary Rowlandson
and Olaudah Equiano were held captive at a time in their lives. White men captured Olaudah
Equiano, while Mary Rowlandson had Indian captivators. Olaudah's story tells of the time where he
first saw the slave ship he was put on and the journey across great waters to the new world.
Rowlandson's story tells of the apathy of the Indians and her stay with the tribe. It is apparent that
the journey across the sea was horrible enough for the ship's passengers to commit suicide by
jumping off of the ship rather than staying on board with the putrid smell of human wastes and lack
of ventilation. In a brief paragraph, Equiano wrote of his daily routine before his captivity. He
mentioned the relationship he had with his mother, and how he was her favorite child. "I became, of
course, the greatest favorite with my mother and was always with her." (72) Olaudah and Mary were
alike because Olaudah had a great relationship with his mother while Mary was fond of her own
child in her narrative. "About two hours in the night, my sweet babe like a lamb departed this life; I
must and could lie down next to my dead babe, side by side all the night after." (2) Neither Olaudah
Equiano nor Mary Rowlandson ended their stories with the family members they were most fond of.
Equiano's captivity was the reason why he was stripped from his mother while Rowlandson's baby
died during her

Uxt Task 1 Essay
I chose to study and analyze J.M.W. Turner's Slave Ship for this project and found it to be very
interesting. Immediately while looking at the piece you get a strong sense of emotion and drama that
is being portrayed. There is a lot of depth and warmth in the colors that are used and wide swift
brush strokes to create the images. The first image that caught my eye was of waves crashing on the
left side of the painting. The white tips of the waves are very noticeable against the softer shades of
the ocean. Behind the waves is a ship which is the next part of the painting that drew my attention.
The ship seems to be caught in the rough waves of the sea and barely able to keep afloat. There is a
glimmer of light from the sun peeking through ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Turner it is a lot clearer as to why he depicted such an emotional and vivid work of art in Slave
Ship. Turner was inspired to paint this piece after reading The History and Abolition of the Slave
Trade by Thomas Clarkson. In 1781, the captain of the slave ship "Zong" had ordered 133 slaves to
be thrown overboard so that insurance payments could be collected. This event probably inspired
Turner to create this artwork. Turner became an advocate for abolishing slavery around the world
and even exhibited this painting during an anti–slavery conference (History in an Hour).
Common themes that were seen in the Romantic era, which spanned from the end of the eighteenth
century to the beginning of the nineteenth century, were naturalism, Gothicism, emotionalism, and
exoticism. Salve Ship definitely portrays some, if not all, of these themes. The most obvious used
theme would be emotion. Turner is clearly trying to get an emotional response out of his audience
with such a dark and dramatic subject matter in this piece or art. It would be very hard not to have
high emotions when looking at it. Work of art from the Romantic time period shares many
similarities with work that is seen in the modern world and today's audience can relate greatly to art
from that time. There is a strong sense of emotion and erotic response in art in the modern age and
people react strongly to that. Art from romanticism brings out the same emotion and response.

Essay On The Tlatelolco Massacre
(Credit: U.S Geological Survey)
The above image is of a building that is not only concurrent with the newest building codes but it
was also built on solid ground that geologist cleared for building.This lapse in judgement led to
reform in both the government and in area building codes however it was necessary to reform one
before one could reform the other. Despite the damage done by the earthquake, the people's biggest
enemy was that of the government. The government of Mexico at the time was run by the (PRI) or
Institutional Revolutionary Party, unfortunately for its citizens however this party was not interested
in picking up the pieces of the community or helping rebuild. Instead they were focused on
advancing their own means, this became clear when the military was authorized to help "Friends" of
the party and ignore those who might be seen as dissidents. When one hears the term party friends
images of the Soviet Union or China come to mind, however while not as dramatic as the Soviets
that is indeed what was happening in Mexico at the time. With the Institutional Revolutionary
Party's reputation still stained from the events of the Tlatelolco massacre, the government's failure to
assist its people with even the most basic forms of aid did not bode well for the parties ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
describing the event from the standpoint of a reporter searching for his family. Like the film
portrayed, the period immediately after the shockwave was full of Mexican citizens flocking to help
their fellow man. The below picture aptly shows this coming together of people, taken from Mexico
News this image (See Below) emphasizes just how important community was to the people of
Mexico City. This coming together shows that while a catastrophic and trying time in Mexico's
history, the Mexican spirit shown through and the country was all together better for it because it
showed the strength of the

Revolution: The American Revolution
The American Revolution was a major turn point in American History. The main question is what
started this revolution? The seven–year war caused the Parliament to reconsider their primary
revenues to be more beneficial to their large national debt. The rioting and rebellions started from
multiple acts being implemented on the colonists, whom did not approve these laws. They came up
with multiple acts such as The Sugar Act, Stamp Act, and Townshend Act to possibly reverse this
tremendous amount of debt. The Sugar Act is debatably the most important act to prompt The
American Revolution. Biologically, sugar effects the brain very dramatically than what they knew
around the 1700– 1900's. When sugar is in your bloodstream the body reacts the same way as if ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While it was an indirect tax, the colonists were still knowledgeable of its happening. Colonists,
especially those affected directly as merchants and shippers, that the new tax was the major culprit
for their economic struggles. Which made for the Act's repeal began almost immediately, and
protests against the Sugar Act at first focused more on the economic impact rather than the
constitutional issue of taxation without representation.
The Sugar Act of 1764 was immediately shut down, disrupted trade between the American colonies
and French and was one of the laws that accelerated, and ended with, the American Revolution. The
British reacts to this resistance to create the stamp act not knowing all of these acts following the
Sugar Act would be rebelled and cause the American Revolution.
Of course the British Parliament thought other acts and ideas would be different but they received
the same results. Yes, it was one of the very first acts, but The Townshend act really started the
rebellion to where colonist retaliated. By taunting the officers and which caused the Boston

The Tlatelolco Massacre
On October 2, 1968, what started off as a peaceful student protest later turned into a bloody
massacre. On this day, students gathered together in Tlatelolco plaza to peacefully protest against
the government. The students were there for a rally but they were surrounded by armed military
troops, who opened fire and started the massacre. The Massacre of Tlatelolco will always remain as
a part of Mexico's bloody and dark history. Prior to the massacre, in July 1968, students began to
start a movement after a conflict had occurred between two schools and the government sent in the
riot police to "stop" the conflict. (Miller, 5) At the end of the month, students gathered together to
protest against police brutality, which ended by the students ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Although the accurate facts of the massacre will remain a mystery, it still made an impact on society.
One impact the massacre made was that it inspired writers to write about what happened. "The
literature of Tlatelolco revealed that the ideals of the Revolution, so strongly defended by the party
in power, had become empty" (Leal, 13), this statement claims that the students had the power prior
to the massacre. They felt strongly for what they were fighting for and they did not let the
government stop them. After many encounters with the military troops, the students continued to
fight, which showed that they were not afraid of the government. But after the massacre, the student
movement ended which caused them to lose their power against the government. After a few years,
activists started to create movements again but they remained traumatized from the massacre.
Another impact is that the government lost its legitimacy and was questioned as to whether or not
they can properly govern. (Gutmann, 61) The aftermath of the event taught citizens that the
government cannot always be trusted. This event may cause the citizens to wonder what else the
government could be covering up. It also shows to what extent the government will go just to
remain powerful over the

Nanking Atrocities
Nanking was not the only place of Japanese Army atrocities. Nanking held the distinction of
allowing foreigners to witness and survive the atrocities. I learned from the story that the Japanese
Army would take drastic measures to eliminate a people, to systematically use every means
available to eliminate your enemy, people that may not have been involved, people that got in your
way and people you just took pleasure in killing. To even invite fellow military personnel who were
not even involved to come and watch as if it is some side show. A sick pride in performing your
duties.To knowingly kill people in many different possible ways, who are just scared and frightened,
just to entertain yourself. Why did killing go on even as

The Boston Massacre : The Cause Of The American Revolution
The Boston Massacre took place on March 5th, 1770. This historic event was caused because of an
ongoing conflict between the British soldiers and the people of Boston. According to George Hewes
account, "Crowds of artisans and laborers joined the elite in protesting British policies, although
their differing points of view revealed the divisions within colonial society." People were upset over
the British passing the Towsend Act, which was a surplus of unpopular taxes. The people of Boston
also resented the British troops, who were also looking for jobs.
During this time, the British soldiers injured many people, killing at least five of them. No one
knows for sure why these incidents occurred, but it is evident that the British felt threatened by the
Colonists. Many differents accounts of the Boston Massacre exist, therefore it is difficult to
determine which of them are completely accurate. The Massacre started on King street, between a
group of Colonists and British soldiers. Tension was evident between the two groups because the
British soldiers were living in Boston. The colonists first caused the Massacre, by threatening,
protesting, and striking first; causing a great amount of tension. The colonists were also upset over
the taxes being placed on them from the Townshend Acts, causing even more hatred. All of these
feelings and disputes is what ultimately led to the American Revolution. During the Boston
Massacre, the British soldiers were threatened by the

Paul Revere And The Boston Massacre
The newspaper was made so that the people could know what was happening around their
community. Propaganda was very popular with the colonists even though most of the content that
was printed in the newspaper was not always true. Even though it was not like by the government
the colonists like the newspapers. The newspaper would show dramatize images to get the colonists
to buy their newspaper just as patriot Paul Revere did for the printing of the Boston Massacre. He
showed and exaggerated image of what had happened at the Boston Massacre. The newspaper that
was published based on the Boston Massacre change the way some people saw Great Britain. There
was a mob that had started to attack the British barracks and then started to attack Hugh White, who
got surrounded by the mob and then came Captain Thomas Preston to help him with his soldiers.
The angry crowd, then started to throw snowballs and other items at the British soldiers which
infuriated the soldiers. The British soldiers under Captain Thomas Presto started to fire at the crowd
and killed 5 men and wounded others. When the Boston Massacre happened, it was shown in the
newspaper a few days after the event had occurred. The newspaper told the event a little different to
what happened, it changed people's views, and it affected all the colonists. After the Boston
Massacre, many people started to print newspapers to spread the news quickly of the catastrophic
event that had occurred in Boston. Paul Revere was the

How People Participate in the Political and Social...
Paper #1 (Revised) – How did people, particularly the working class, participate in the political and
social revolution of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries?
Divas in History Throughout history it has been seen that women have a sound role to play in
positive movements against governments. There is a saying, "Behind every great man is a great
woman". There have been many events that could only be done by women to get a progressive
transformation in society. There are instances where women and men had to unite. Women took part
in many events that transpired in the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution. Even though
women were encouraged to hold down the household this was not there only role as they also were
the reinforcement section of the working force, women were the back bone of many revolutions.
There are many important women such as Olympe de Goupes, also many infamous events, but the
most memorable actions in which women were involved might have been the March to Versailles
and the Peterloo Massacre.
Olympe de Gouges battled to give women the entitlement to divorce. In this era it was the man
alone that could divorce. She drove for civil joint venture and was critical of slavery. She was a
zealous feminist who breathed her last breath for her ideals. She disagreed with religious marriage,
which she considered "love and trust's grave". She chose the theatre, which was at the head of
avant–garde politics, to utter her militant ideas to

Analysis Of Francois Hutteau's Great Search For Liberty
Francois Hutteau's great search for Liberty
Hello my French brothers and sisters! Dark times have befallen our precious land, and pure chaos
has ensued. I write to the people in France in hopes of establishing a new land. A land that can be
looked upon proudly with eyes of great virtue. In order to achieve our wildest dreams we must sort
through the rubbish that has landed us here in the first place. How will we as a society react to the
many things that have been dealt to the people of France? Perhaps our great fight ends in bloodshed,
and broken promises. Or perhaps we could take heed of the laws and policies our fellow Europeans
across the Sea. I had the pleasure of visiting one of the cities in America that the citizens take so
much pride in: Boston, Massachusetts. A port town on the North–Eastern coast that was a large part
of the American Revolution. It was also home to the Notorious Boston Massacre. There are a
number of things that I enjoyed about my trip, but pointing out the differences between Boston and
France had to be the most delectable part of my trip. The way in which they practice religion is
something to behold. Their new Constitution is also no laughing matter, and lastly the many things
Americans find fun is mesmerizing, and also repulsive. America is a tremendous place and I cannot
wait to guide you through my journey and inferences.
The first voyage I made when I got off the boat was directly towards a church. I decided to visit the
Old North Church and as I approached I noticed that the brick work seemed to glisten in the sun,
and the white interior reminded me of how pure the world can really be. The church practiced
Protestantism, and started soon after the War.[1] I admired the way in which the citizens praised
God, but I did happen to notice that their practices were rather different from my own. After talking
to some of the Americans most had either commented on my accent or expressed their condolences
to the revolution. I also asked them about how they worship and how they choose to worship. Many
of these American citizens were free to choose what they wanted to worship. Most did say that they
would be judged for their religious decisions, but were never forced into doing

Ordinary Men by Christopher Browning
The purpose of history is to understand the past so that we can take wisdom from those experiences
and improve the present and the future. The events that occurred during the Final Solution are so
horrendous that often it is viewed as so repugnant that we label the people involved as purely evil,
they are dehumanized. This is dangerous, as it doesn't allow us to obtain wisdom, perspective, and
empathy for those involved. Ordinary Men allows an opportunity to see these events from the eyes
of the perpetrators and their journey that led to what seems to people today as ruthless, unscrupulous
murder. When in fact these people were literally ordinary men who were introduced to unordinary
circumstances which caused them to abandon their humanity. If we discredit these people as
inhuman we fail to learn the lessons of human nature so we can avoid them in the future. Winston
Churchill embodies the lessons learned from Ordinary Men as he said "Those that fail to learn from
history are doomed to repeat it." The massacre in Jozefow was first to introduce the men of
Battalion 101 to mass murder. The orders were that males of working age were to be sent Lublin to
serve as work Jews, while the women, children and the elderly were to be exterminated by gunshot
immediately. Major Wilhelm Trapp, the battle commander, found these orders repulsive and one of
his officers having learned about the upcoming massacre asked to be reassigned to avoid the
impending violence; his request was

Essay about The Mexican Tlaltelolco Massacre
Around the time of the Massacre in Mexico, there were a number of books written based on the
brutal killings. Three popular books that were written by Mexican writers and addressed the
movement of Mexican students, during that era, were Massacre in Mexico (by Elena Poniatowska),
'68 (by Paco Ignacio Taibo II), and Palinuro of Mexico (by Fernando de Paso). Their literature
presented a disturbing look into a student movement, which culminated in hundreds of student
protestors being massacred on October 2, 1968, in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas/Tlatelolco of
Mexico City. This event led Pablo Ignacio Taibo II to write in the preface of his book '68, "There are
no countries without fairy tales lurking in their shadows." His book is a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
What are the gender politics that emerge in these texts? Do these texts rely on or challenge universal
human rights discourse? And to begin, I will provide a brief summary on what took place in
Mexico, in 1968.
1968 wound up being a tumultuous year, globally. Author Mark Kurlansky added confirmation,
when he gave his book, 1968, the subtitle, "The year that rocked the world." In the beginning of
1968, Mexico was experiencing economic growth and preparing to host the summer Olympics, the
same year. At the same time, Mexico's President, Gustavo Diaz Ordaz feared what might become of
the Cuban and French radicals that were attempting to cause problems, throughout the world. To
make matters worse, there were students in France holding protests, during May of the same year.
The death of Ernesto "Che" Guevara, the year before, was causing a rise of Communist furor. The
Institutional Revolutionary Party, Ordaz's political party had a habit of locking up dissidents, buying
them off, or having them killed (Kurlansky 328).
In late July, the movement erupted, due to being in this type of environment. Four days prior to the
movement's eruption, there was a fight between a couple of local schools. Although anti–riot units
and police were called in to stop the fight, the units started provoking the students. Eventually, the
students attempted to end the fight and run back to their schools. But, the units chased after them
and assaulted teachers and students in

Mexico City 's Sheer Size
Mexico City's history contains many different identities experienced by both the people and
government. The city's sheer size poses many challenges when it comes to governing and
representation of each individual. Often, government officials are not elected but appointed to
represent the citizens of Mexico, causing many conflicts of interest (Perlman and Guadarrama 144–
145). Mexico's history is one of constant identity shifts. According to Mexican anthropologist
Guillermo Bonfil Batalla, Mexico has often been in opposition between two groups, those of
"Mesoamerican origin" and those groups with their own visions of "Western civilization" (Batalla
28). Opposing views of national identity contributed to the narrative around modernization in
Mexico City. The view of modernization is one of looking to the future while holding onto the past;
being technologically innovative yet holding on to cultural roots. In the 1960's, Mexico's desire to
become a modern nation in the eyes of the world was therefore a stitching together of standards set
by the rest of the modern world with Mexico's always–present heritage. When Mexico was awarded
the Olympics, their government took advantage of their chance to compete on a global stage
(Castañeda 113). They began to take the necessary steps in preparation for their 1968 world debut;
including the creation of architecture as one such innovation; for instance, Mario Pani's housing
complex, Conjunto Habitacional Urbano Nonoalco Tlatelolco. This

Olympic Games And Its Impact On Society
Sports have played a major role in society for as far back as dated history goes. Today's greatest
sporting events capture the interest of billions of people. No one sporting event is greater than the
Summer Olympic games, for it brings together athletes from all across the globe to compete and
represent their respected nations. Winning an Olympic gold medal can create a widespread feeling
of patriotism and unite a nation. Unfortunately, the events of the 1972 Olympic Games were a
catastrophic disaster. Consequently, the following will reveal the 1972 Munich Summer Olympic
Games tragedy and the ramifications of its build up, the event, and the lasting effects on society.
The events that occurred at the 1972 Olympics were the result of a long conflict between Palestinian
Arabs and Israeli Jews dating to the end of the nineteenth century. The two nations have contrasting
religious beliefs and conflict broke out between them for who had the ownership of a strip of land
that both states considered to be holy. From the end of World War I until 1948, the area that both
groups claimed was known internationally as Palestine. Following the war of 1948–1949, this land
was divided into three parts: The State of Israel, the West Bank (of the Jordan River) and the Gaza
Strip. It is a small area–approximately 10,000 square miles, or about the size of the state of
Maryland. Both nations cited historical religious evidence for why the land should belong to them
and no solution could be

The Short, Savage Life of a Civil War Guerrilla

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cindy Turner

More from Cindy Turner (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Short, Savage Life of a Civil War Guerrilla