SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Evaluation Question 3
When all of our classes trailers where finished we came together as a class to give positive
and negative feedback on each other’s trailers. We did this by everyone getting a piece of
paper and viewing each trailer at least twice, we then wrote down any good or bad points
about the trailer being shown. The audience (our class) age range was seventeen to
nineteen therefore it is within our target group so it was a big help to us. We received a lot
of feedback, mostly all the negative points where the same from each person, and we could
see that these were the parts that needed the most work. We could also see from the
positive feedback the parts which were good and made our trailer stand out from the
others. I was happy about the feedback and also watching the trailer on a bigger screen I
could see most of the criticisms anyway which we perhaps missed as a group. Not only was
the written feedback an effective way of reviewing our trailer, we could also look at the
audience reactions and see if the trailer had the desired effectat a certain time, for example
the jumpy part at the end.
We started to work on the negatives straight away to improve our trailer. Production
companies rely on feedback and the research they do to give them a start-up knowledge of
whether it’s going to be a success or not. Receiving feedback is definitely one of the most
important parts of any films production because, sometimes when you have created
something yourself you overlook small flaws that other people will pick up on straight away.
Included in the weaknesses we got from feedback were; the font used for the titles, too
many running scenes, the baby laughing sound effect came up a lot, the Facebook group
shot – this was because you couldn’t see the whole storyline from the trailer, the story line
came up which is connected to the last point, and finally the pace of the trailer was an issue.
We responded to this feedback to the best of our abilities and in the short time we had.
Some of the big negatives were easy to overcome such as the font which was easily changed
in Premier Pro, and the baby laughing sound effect which was again easily removed. We
shortened the chase scene, responding to the ‘too much running’ comments, and added a
few different shots in. another change we made was to the sound, we played around and
tried to get it to flow as much as possible which it previously didn’t. Some of the other
negative points where harder to change due to limitations in the footage we had and
without having to rearrange the whole trailer. Overall I was happy with the changes we
made because the positives will be more apparent as people will no longer be able to focus
on the bigger negative points.
We actually received a lot more positive feedback points that I personally was expecting to
get. We obviously had an idea of what we as a group thought were our strongest parts in
our trailer but it was good to have this confirmed by impartial viewers, also some people
picked up on parts that we hadn’t noticed and said they were really effective. As a group
one of our favourite shots was the ending shot of the person being hung, this was confirmed
as almost every piece of feedback we got had a positive comment about that shot. One part
we didn’t necessarily think would get good feedback is the part where the three characters
walking down the alley with the jump shots to the POV of the killer running down the same
alley, however this actually got quite a lot of good feedback. Another part which got good
reviews was the part in the church with the killer walking away down the aisle. We did put a
lot of time and effort into the filming of the scenes in the church as we found this the most
effective space to film in and also thought that this was the shots that reflected the story.
The feedback we got for all of these shots proved that it was worth taking the time on as
these were people’s favourite parts of the trailer. One part of our trailer that we weren’t
sure about was using the bible quotes as the titles. We got an equal amount of bad and
good comments for these and decided against changing them as they reinforced our
religious theme.
Overall at first there was as many negative points as positive points but I believe that now
that we have altered our trailer the positives definitely outweigh the negatives. We believe
that after making these changes to our trailer it meets the criteria and common codes and
conventions of horror which we aimed to meet.

More Related Content

What's hot

Evaluation Q3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Evaluation Q3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?Evaluation Q3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Evaluation Q3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?
natericafaria
 
Media open questionnaire results
Media open questionnaire resultsMedia open questionnaire results
Media open questionnaire results
Sam Terry
 
Questionnaire analysis
Questionnaire analysisQuestionnaire analysis
Questionnaire analysis
jess carney
 
Evaluation question 3 - What have you learned from your feedback
Evaluation question 3 - What have you learned from your feedbackEvaluation question 3 - What have you learned from your feedback
Evaluation question 3 - What have you learned from your feedback
Chay123
 
Audience Feedback
Audience FeedbackAudience Feedback
Audience Feedback
Rushrugby
 
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
What have you learned from your audience feedback?What have you learned from your audience feedback?
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
kikiASmedia
 
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?, question 3
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?, question 3What have you learnt from your audience feedback?, question 3
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?, question 3
Rachel Pedder
 
Task 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluationTask 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluation
ad11574
 
What have you learnt from your audience feedback, question 3
What have you learnt from your audience feedback, question 3What have you learnt from your audience feedback, question 3
What have you learnt from your audience feedback, question 3
Rachel Pedder
 

What's hot (20)

Media evaluation question 3
Media evaluation question 3Media evaluation question 3
Media evaluation question 3
 
Evaluation Q3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Evaluation Q3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?Evaluation Q3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Evaluation Q3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?
 
Media open questionnaire results
Media open questionnaire resultsMedia open questionnaire results
Media open questionnaire results
 
Eval 3
Eval 3Eval 3
Eval 3
 
Evaluation taks 3 media final
Evaluation taks 3 media final Evaluation taks 3 media final
Evaluation taks 3 media final
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3
 
Questionnaire analysis
Questionnaire analysisQuestionnaire analysis
Questionnaire analysis
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3 Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3
 
Evaluation question 3 - What have you learned from your feedback
Evaluation question 3 - What have you learned from your feedbackEvaluation question 3 - What have you learned from your feedback
Evaluation question 3 - What have you learned from your feedback
 
What have you learned from your target audience feedback?
What have you learned from your target audience feedback?What have you learned from your target audience feedback?
What have you learned from your target audience feedback?
 
Audience Feedback
Audience FeedbackAudience Feedback
Audience Feedback
 
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
What have you learned from your audience feedback?What have you learned from your audience feedback?
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
 
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?, question 3
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?, question 3What have you learnt from your audience feedback?, question 3
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?, question 3
 
Evaluation q3
Evaluation q3Evaluation q3
Evaluation q3
 
Evaluation question 5
Evaluation question 5Evaluation question 5
Evaluation question 5
 
Task 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluationTask 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluation
 
Evaluation a2
Evaluation a2Evaluation a2
Evaluation a2
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3
 
What have you learnt from your audience feedback, question 3
What have you learnt from your audience feedback, question 3What have you learnt from your audience feedback, question 3
What have you learnt from your audience feedback, question 3
 
Evaluation med q2
Evaluation med q2Evaluation med q2
Evaluation med q2
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Evaluation question 2
Evaluation question 2Evaluation question 2
Evaluation question 2
 
Evaluation question 4
Evaluation question 4Evaluation question 4
Evaluation question 4
 
Digipak Draft
Digipak DraftDigipak Draft
Digipak Draft
 
Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1
 
Cr ppt 1
Cr ppt 1Cr ppt 1
Cr ppt 1
 
Evaluation question 2 complete
Evaluation question 2 completeEvaluation question 2 complete
Evaluation question 2 complete
 
Quien mido por primera ves la gravedad
Quien mido por primera ves la gravedadQuien mido por primera ves la gravedad
Quien mido por primera ves la gravedad
 
VOL32N16-6A-EDU
VOL32N16-6A-EDUVOL32N16-6A-EDU
VOL32N16-6A-EDU
 
carre Eden appartement
carre Eden appartement carre Eden appartement
carre Eden appartement
 
Carta de presentación
Carta de presentaciónCarta de presentación
Carta de presentación
 
Actividad no. 1 fisica
Actividad no. 1 fisicaActividad no. 1 fisica
Actividad no. 1 fisica
 
Joshua Michael Sackenheim CV
Joshua Michael Sackenheim CVJoshua Michael Sackenheim CV
Joshua Michael Sackenheim CV
 
Concilio Consult 2015 Overview
Concilio Consult 2015 OverviewConcilio Consult 2015 Overview
Concilio Consult 2015 Overview
 
Reseña 1 de oape
Reseña 1 de oapeReseña 1 de oape
Reseña 1 de oape
 

Similar to Evaluation question 3 (20)

Q3
Q3Q3
Q3
 
Q 3
Q 3Q 3
Q 3
 
Part 4
Part 4Part 4
Part 4
 
Audience Feedback
Audience FeedbackAudience Feedback
Audience Feedback
 
Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3 Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3
 
A2 Media Evaluation - Question 3
A2 Media Evaluation - Question 3A2 Media Evaluation - Question 3
A2 Media Evaluation - Question 3
 
Question 3 Evaluation
Question 3 EvaluationQuestion 3 Evaluation
Question 3 Evaluation
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3
 
Evaluation four
Evaluation fourEvaluation four
Evaluation four
 
Task 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluationTask 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluation
 
Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3
 
Evaluation task 3
Evaluation task 3Evaluation task 3
Evaluation task 3
 
Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3
 
Evaluation part 4
Evaluation part 4Evaluation part 4
Evaluation part 4
 
Media evaluation question 3
Media evaluation question 3Media evaluation question 3
Media evaluation question 3
 
Eq3 useful
Eq3 usefulEq3 useful
Eq3 useful
 
Evaluation part 4
Evaluation part 4Evaluation part 4
Evaluation part 4
 
Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3
 
Evaluation taks 3 media
Evaluation taks 3 media Evaluation taks 3 media
Evaluation taks 3 media
 

Evaluation question 3

  • 1. Evaluation Question 3 When all of our classes trailers where finished we came together as a class to give positive and negative feedback on each other’s trailers. We did this by everyone getting a piece of paper and viewing each trailer at least twice, we then wrote down any good or bad points about the trailer being shown. The audience (our class) age range was seventeen to nineteen therefore it is within our target group so it was a big help to us. We received a lot of feedback, mostly all the negative points where the same from each person, and we could see that these were the parts that needed the most work. We could also see from the positive feedback the parts which were good and made our trailer stand out from the others. I was happy about the feedback and also watching the trailer on a bigger screen I could see most of the criticisms anyway which we perhaps missed as a group. Not only was the written feedback an effective way of reviewing our trailer, we could also look at the audience reactions and see if the trailer had the desired effectat a certain time, for example the jumpy part at the end. We started to work on the negatives straight away to improve our trailer. Production companies rely on feedback and the research they do to give them a start-up knowledge of whether it’s going to be a success or not. Receiving feedback is definitely one of the most important parts of any films production because, sometimes when you have created something yourself you overlook small flaws that other people will pick up on straight away. Included in the weaknesses we got from feedback were; the font used for the titles, too many running scenes, the baby laughing sound effect came up a lot, the Facebook group shot – this was because you couldn’t see the whole storyline from the trailer, the story line came up which is connected to the last point, and finally the pace of the trailer was an issue. We responded to this feedback to the best of our abilities and in the short time we had. Some of the big negatives were easy to overcome such as the font which was easily changed in Premier Pro, and the baby laughing sound effect which was again easily removed. We shortened the chase scene, responding to the ‘too much running’ comments, and added a few different shots in. another change we made was to the sound, we played around and tried to get it to flow as much as possible which it previously didn’t. Some of the other negative points where harder to change due to limitations in the footage we had and without having to rearrange the whole trailer. Overall I was happy with the changes we made because the positives will be more apparent as people will no longer be able to focus on the bigger negative points.
  • 2. We actually received a lot more positive feedback points that I personally was expecting to get. We obviously had an idea of what we as a group thought were our strongest parts in our trailer but it was good to have this confirmed by impartial viewers, also some people picked up on parts that we hadn’t noticed and said they were really effective. As a group one of our favourite shots was the ending shot of the person being hung, this was confirmed as almost every piece of feedback we got had a positive comment about that shot. One part we didn’t necessarily think would get good feedback is the part where the three characters walking down the alley with the jump shots to the POV of the killer running down the same alley, however this actually got quite a lot of good feedback. Another part which got good reviews was the part in the church with the killer walking away down the aisle. We did put a lot of time and effort into the filming of the scenes in the church as we found this the most effective space to film in and also thought that this was the shots that reflected the story. The feedback we got for all of these shots proved that it was worth taking the time on as these were people’s favourite parts of the trailer. One part of our trailer that we weren’t sure about was using the bible quotes as the titles. We got an equal amount of bad and good comments for these and decided against changing them as they reinforced our religious theme. Overall at first there was as many negative points as positive points but I believe that now that we have altered our trailer the positives definitely outweigh the negatives. We believe that after making these changes to our trailer it meets the criteria and common codes and conventions of horror which we aimed to meet.