Materi Kuliah Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah

1. THE IMPORTANCE
of Evaluation
in Development Planning

2. Tujuan
tercapai
The Flow of Thought
Implementasi
Planning Activity
Evaluasi
Bagaimana
mencapai
tujuan?
Cari
Strategi
Perencanaan

3. Current
Situation
Future
Situation
Quality
Time

4. The ProposalEvaluation
Report
?
Current
Situation
progressing
Future
Situation
Position
(Data)
Situational
Analysis
Conclusions
Vision,
Mission
Objective
Strategic
Moves
Performance
Indicators
Implementation
Activities
Resources
Required
Financial Sources
Directives &
Assumptions
conceptuallink
documentlink
Proposed
Plan
General

5. Institusional
objectives
PLANS
progressing
Current
Situation
Effort of the whole institution
Future
Situation
Evaluation Report
Vision
Mission
Performance
indicators
Funding Scheme A
Objectives A
Funding Scheme B
Objectives B
Funding Scheme C
Objectives C

6. Evaluation
 E is a systematic effort to gather and process
reliable and legitimate data (facts and
information) from which a conclusion about
something can be drawn
 The objective of an E is to reveal the true
(factual) characteristics of an object being
observed
 E should be conducted as the foundation for
establishing strategic/development plan

7. Pengolahan Data
Verifikasi
Data
Pengelompokan
Data
Jumlah % Jumlah % Jumlah %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1995/1996 15 40.54% 18 48.65% 4 10.81% 37 2.58
1996/1997 13 33.33% 20 51.28% 6 15.38% 39 2.67
1997/1998 14 28.57% 27 55.10% 8 16.33% 49 2.70
1998/1999 15 30.00% 26 52.00% 9 18.00% 50 2.70
1999/2000 17 25.37% 39 58.21% 11 16.42% 67 2.67
Total 74 30.58% 130 53.72% 38 15.70% 242 2.67
TahunLulus
IPKRata-
rata
Total
Lulusan
IPK<2.5 IPK2.5 -3.0 IPK>3.0
Jumlah % Jumlah % Jumlah %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1995/1996 15 40.54% 18 48.65% 4 10.81% 37 2.58
1996/1997 13 33.33% 20 51.28% 6 15.38% 39 2.67
1997/1998 14 28.57% 27 55.10% 8 16.33% 49 2.70
1998/1999 15 30.00% 26 52.00% 9 18.00% 50 2.70
1999/2000 17 25.37% 39 58.21% 11 16.42% 67 2.67
Total 74 30.58% 130 53.72% 38 15.70% 242 2.67
TahunLulus
IPKRata-
rata
Total
Lulusan
IPK<2.5 IPK2.5 -3.0 IPK>3.0
Jumlah % Jumlah % Jumlah %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1995/1996 15 40.54% 18 48.65% 4 10.81% 37 2.58
1996/1997 13 33.33% 20 51.28% 6 15.38% 39 2.67
1997/1998 14 28.57% 27 55.10% 8 16.33% 49 2.70
1998/1999 15 30.00% 26 52.00% 9 18.00% 50 2.70
1999/2000 17 25.37% 39 58.21% 11 16.42% 67 2.67
Total 74 30.58% 130 53.72% 38 15.70% 242 2.67
TahunLulus
IPKRata-
rata
Total
Lulusan
IPK<2.5 IPK2.5 -3.0 IPK>3.0
Isi
Tabel2
Statistical Performance:
Lihat Data Profil Wilayah
Cek Konsistensi
Data antar tabel
Analisa Masing2 Tabel
- Performance: lihat trend
- Profile: bandingkan dng standar
Jumlah % Jumlah % Jumlah %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1995/1996 15 40.54% 18 48.65% 4 10.81% 37 2.58
1996/1997 13 33.33% 20 51.28% 6 15.38% 39 2.67
1997/1998 14 28.57% 27 55.10% 8 16.33% 49 2.70
1998/1999 15 30.00% 26 52.00% 9 18.00% 50 2.70
1999/2000 17 25.37% 39 58.21% 11 16.42% 67 2.67
Total 74 30.58% 130 53.72% 38 15.70% 242 2.67
TahunLulus
IPKRata-
rata
Total
Lulusan
IPK<2.5 IPK2.5 -3.0 IPK>3.0
Kesimpulan :
……………
……………
Kesimpulan :
……………
……………
Pengumpulan
Data

8. Attributes of Good E
 Involvement of all relevant elements
 Support from stakeholders
 Involvement of key actors/persons
 Comprehensiveness
 Relevance and comprehensiveness of
important issues/aspects being raised
 At all levels (department, bureau, office)

9. Attributes of Good E
 Data accuracy
 Data must be accurate and consistent with the
issues/aspects being discussed
 Must clearly describe the sources, method of
acquisition and any assumptions taken
 Depth of analysis
 Must be able to show the relationship amongst
strategic issues, relevant data/information,
identified problem, and proposed solutions
 SWOT, Force-Field, Root-Cause Analysis
 Development plan
 Should be developed based on the conclusion of E

10. Situational Analysis
Current
Situation
Position
(data section 2-12)
Situational
Analysis
(Section 2-12)
Conclusions
Self-Evaluation
SWOT
Analysis
Root-Cause
Analysis
Problems Statement
……………………
……………………
……………………
Strength Weaknesses
………… …………
………… …………
Opportunities Threats
…………. …………
…………. …………
Restraining forces
Driving forces
Force-Field
Analysis
Rencana Strategis - Strategic Planning (global)
Rencana Operasional - Tactical Planning (detail)

11. SWOT Analysis
Jumlah % Jumlah % Jumlah %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1995/1996 15 40.54% 18 48.65% 4 10.81% 37 2.58
1996/1997 13 33.33% 20 51.28% 6 15.38% 39 2.67
1997/1998 14 28.57% 27 55.10% 8 16.33% 49 2.70
1998/1999 15 30.00% 26 52.00% 9 18.00% 50 2.70
1999/2000 17 25.37% 39 58.21% 11 16.42% 67 2.67
Total 74 30.58% 130 53.72% 38 15.70% 242 2.67
TahunLulus
IPKRata-
rata
Total
Lulusan
IPK<2.5 IPK2.5 -3.0 IPK>3.0
Kesimpulan :
……………
……………
Kesimpulan :
……………
……………
Internal data
External data
SWOT
Analysis
Strength Weaknesses
………… …………
………… …………
Opportunities Threats
…………. …………
…………. …………
Strength > Weaknesess
Opportunities > Threats
Strength < Weaknesess
Opportunities < Threats
Konsolidasi?
Ekspansi
Strategi
Pengembangan
ST/DefensiveStrategy
WO/InternalAdjustmentOriented
WT / Self-Defence
SO /Growth Oriented
IFAS
EFAS

12. Root-Cause Analysis
Gejala 1
Gejala 2
Gejala 4
Gejala 5
Gejala 6
Akar
masala
h
Solusi 1
Solusi 2
Solusi 3
Solusi 4
Solusi 5 Solusi
terpilih
Akar
masala
h
Solusi 1
Solusi 2
Solusi 3
Solusi 4
Solusi 5
Solusi
terpili
h
Solusi
terpilih
Gejala 3

13. Force-Field Analysis
Kesimpulan
Kondisi R
Kondisi A
Kondisi I
Kondisi S
Kondisi E
Faktor Pendorong
Faktor Penghambat
Kondisi saat ini (status quo)
- Faktor Pendorong
ditambah/ditingkatkan?
- Faktor penghambat
diturunkan/dikurangi?
Jumlah % Jumlah % Jumlah %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1995/1996 15 40.54% 18 48.65% 4 10.81% 37 2.58
1996/1997 13 33.33% 20 51.28% 6 15.38% 39 2.67
1997/1998 14 28.57% 27 55.10% 8 16.33% 49 2.70
1998/1999 15 30.00% 26 52.00% 9 18.00% 50 2.70
1999/2000 17 25.37% 39 58.21% 11 16.42% 67 2.67
Total 74 30.58% 130 53.72% 38 15.70% 242 2.67
TahunLulus
IPKRata-
rata
Total
Lulusan
IPK<2.5 IPK2.5 -3.0 IPK>3.0
Kesimpulan :
……………
……………
Kesimpulan :
……………
……………
Internal data
External data