1. Brenda M. Perea
Instructional Design Project Manager
Colorado Community College System
CCCS’s Digital Badge Possibilities
2. Colorado Community College System
Badge Consortium
Colorado Community
College System has
partnered with a
consortium of 2 /4 year
higher education
institutions, business and
workforce to create a digital
badging ecosystem to
address stakeholders
(education,
industry/business and
workforce) needs.
CCCS is hoping to build a
comprehensive badge
ecosystem where digital
badges convey value
through micro-credentialed
learning.
3. College Level Learning
• Traditional Credentials
– As a community we
have given
information on a
transcript implicit
meaning
– Grades, certificates
and degrees are a
visual
representation of
mastery
4. Largest Potential for Micro-
Credentials
• Capturing latent talent using unified
language
–Recognition of specific skills or knowledge
–Display achievements
• Creating transparent pathways
–Building a digital portfolio or academic
transcript
• Motivate learners
5. The vision
Every badge issued or accepted is tied to: specific standard or
competency or industry evaluation providing evidence of micro-
learning.
Based in capturing competency in different ways and be:
• Industry driven
• Community centered
• Learner focused
Pilot Digital badging project would be developed to be the model
for a system wide badging initiative.
6. Provide a way for anyone to
Differentiate themselves from a crowd
7. The Journey…late 2013
• Opportunities
– TAACCCT grants
– Colorado Workforce asked for other types of credentialing
– Colorado Industry demanded shorter turnaround training
– Colorado State University (CSU) developed a non-credit
professional development program that unbundled on-
demand and competency based.
• Challenges
– K-12 public school system implementing badges desired
badges to articulate to the community colleges
– Workforce was experiencing large incumbent workers
needing retraining
8. How did we start?
Colorado Career Cluster Model: Agriculture
& Energy, Advanced Manufacturing, IT, Health
Science & Public Safety, Hospitality & Education,
Business & Public Administration
– Round tables with the community and business in
discussing current educational delivery and what
was really needed
– Evaluation of badges with a jobs driven approach
– Identified how the learner/earner would value
badges
9. Digital badge value
• Assessments
• Testing
• Portfolio of work
• Certifications
• Field work in real time
documented with
images, movies….
“currency” is
based on
recognition of
the value of
demonstrated
mastery
10. Issuing
Badges
• Transcript
PLA
• Identify and
crosswalk
Competencies
• Review
Metadata
• Access the
digital badge
Display
• Identify
granular
competencies
Competencies
• Measure
mastery
Assessments
• Compile the
meta data
Metadata
• Issue digital
credential
Badges
Define the Ecosystem of Micro-credentials
in Higher Ed
ACCEPTING
BADGES
11. Define the Ecosystem of Micro-credentials
in Industry
Issuing
Badges
• Identify skills
and
competencies
Competencies
• Evidence of
mastery
Evidence
• Compile the
metadata
Metadata
• Issue digital
credential
Badges
ACCEPTING
BADGES
• Document
Credential
• Identify and
match to job
skills
Competencies
• Review for
mastery
Metadata
• Access the
digital badge
Display
12. Expectations of where Digital Badges
Micro-Credentials fit
Proof of concept
– TAACCCT 3 grant, built a free MOOC-Technical Math
for Industry mirroring for credit MAT108 course
• Identified evaluations/assessments for the 27
competencies in the credit course
• Grouped the competencies in “chunks” of learning
with appropriate summative assessments
• Designed badges to visually represent the
competencies
– Creation of badges is dependent upon industry
understanding micro-credentials in terms of workforce
and faculty understand value behind digital badges
14. Biggest Challenges to Building Badge
Systems
• Lack of knowledge or awareness about badges
inside and outside of institutions
• Resistance from faculty and administration
• Time needed to design and assess badges
• Technical challenges (platforms, tools, staff)
• Requires investment of infrastructure
– Stable and sustainable platform
– Control over metadata, typical lifespan is 5-
7 years
15. Critical assessment of Student
Management System
Evaluation of the student management system
– Competencies of courses all in one text field
– Grades to Courses need to be grades to
competencies
• Rewriting competencies not only to reflect
higher order Bloom’s taxonomy, but in
looking forward to competency based
education goals
– How do you transcript information such as
digital credentials?
16. Evaluation of our Prior Learning Policy
Prior to February 2015 Revised Policy
Credit for Prior Learning Prior Learning Assessment Credit
One credit in residency requirement Credit on transcript when student
applies/ declares major
Varied costs: <50% of tuition cost per
credit
System –wide cost matrix
Institutional assessment methods, vary
by college
PLA training and standards for assessors
Handbook: specific to current policy.
Most credit matrix information 2005 or
earlier.
Handbook: Expanded crosswalks; ACE
apprenticeships/industry credentials,
shared challenge exams, state/local
industry training
17. The acceleration of the Colorado Badge
Movement...
• Demand from Industry
– Shortage of qualified workers
• Colorado Advanced Manufacturing Alliance
– Economic development
• May 2015 Executive Branch of Colorado state
government
• October 2015 State Representative crafting
legislation around digital badges
18.
19. What we are experiencing and
Issues to avoid
• Conflicting badging systems and
procedures
– Inconsistent metadata
• Participatory or “gaming achievement”
badges
–“Carpet badging”
• Competing badges
21. CC BY License
This Workforce Solution CCCS’s Badging Possibilities Brenda M. Perea is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the
scope of this license may be available at www.cccs.edu.
This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of
Labor’s Employment and Training Administration. The solution was created by the
grantee and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of
Labor. The Department of Labor makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances of any
kind, express or implied, with respect to such information, including any information on
linked sites, and including, but not limited to accuracy of the information or its
completeness, timeliness, usefulness, adequacy, continued availability or ownership.
Editor's Notes
Breakthrough in Badging
Moving Beyond Colorado Community Colleges’ Policies to Badging Possibilities
Colorado Community College System Badge Consortium
Colorado Community College System is forming a consortium of 2 /4 year higher education institutions, business and workforce to create a digital badging ecosystem to address stakeholders (education, industry/business and workforce) needs.
CCCS is hoping to build a comprehensive badge ecosystem where digital badges convey value through micro-credentialed learning.
College Level Learning
Traditional Credentials
In education, symbols are used to represent what people learn and master.
They can be certificates or degrees to show mastery of specific disciplines
They can be awards or exclusive memberships in organizations
The meaning is implied – the symbols themselves don’t necessarily mean anything
The symbols in a transcript has now been given meaning and through that meaning we agree on certificates and degrees and the certificates and degrees have value outside of issuing body.
For the learner the have become a tool….where we apply them and have given them meaning that they represent an assessment of performance
As a community we have given information on a transcript implicit meaning
Grades, certificates and degrees are a visual representation of mastery
Largest Potential for Micro-Credentials
Capturing latent talent using unified language
Recognition of specific skills or knowledge
Display achievements
Creating transparent pathways
Building a digital portfolio or academic transcript
Motivate learners
Visioning on How to Start…2015
Every badge issued or accepted is tied to: specific standards/or competency, evaluation and evidence of micro-learning.
Created an OPEN Technical Math for Industry MOOC based off the core competencies of the 2-year MAT 108 Technical Math course
Open for all and however provided an incentive for Colorado residents
provided a loop to lure participants to higher educational institutions in the state with challenge test for credit
Vision is that the MOOC would be developed which could be the model for a system wide badging initiative
Digital badges help to identify unique skills or competencies as well as differentiate within a crowd.
The Journey Began…Late 2013
An fortunate set of circumstances
TAACCCT grants
Colorado Workforce asked for other types of credentialing
Colorado Industry demanded shorter turnaround training
In 2012, Colorado State University (CSU) committed to developing a digital badge program that would allow them to address the learning needs of a broader audience. The pilot program was a non-credit professional development program that unbundled on-demand and competency based.
An unfortunate set of circumstances
School system implement badges wanting them to articulate up to the community colleges
Workforce was experiencing large incumbent workers needing retraining
Now What????
Where did we start…
Evaluation of badges as within a jobs driven approach
Anticipate how the learner/earner would value badges
Talk with the community and business in discussing current educational delivery and what was really needed
Digital Badge Value
“Currency” is based on recognition of the value of demonstrated mastery
Demonstrating mastery can be shown through
Assessments
Portfolio of work
Certifications
Field work
Ecosystem of micro-credentials in Higher Ed
Two processes for developing and using badges
Issuing badges
Who is the audience?
Competencies to assessment to metadata to badges
Accepting badges
What do they represent?
Display to metadata to competencies to PLA
Ecosystem of micro-credentials in Industry
Two processes for developing and using badges
Issuing badges
Who is the audience?
Competencies to Evidence to Metadata to Badges
Accepting badges
What do they represent?
Display to metadata to competencies to credential
Expectations of where Digital Badges Micro-Credentials fit
Proof of concept
TAACCCT 3 grant, built a free MOOC-Technical Math for Industry mirroring for credit MAT108 course
Identified evaluations/assessments for the 27 competencies in the credit course
Grouped the competencies in “chunks” of learning with appropriate summative assessments
Designed badges to visually represent the competencies
Building of ecosystem where industry understands micro-credentials in terms of workforce and faculty understand value behind digital badges
Biggest Challenges to Building Badge System
Lack of knowledge or awareness about badges inside and outside of institutions
Resistance from faculty and administration
Time needed to design and assess badges
Technical challenges (platforms, tools, staff)
Requires investment of infrastructure
Stable and sustainable platform
Control over metadata, typical lifespan is 5-7 years
Critical Assessment of Student Management System
Evaluation of the student management system
Competencies of courses all in one text field
Grades to Courses need to be grades to competencies
Rewriting competencies not only to reflect higher order Bloom’s taxonomy, but in looking forward to competency based education goals
How do you transcript information such as digital credentials?
Evaluation of Our Prior Learning Policy Led to Revisions
The Acceleration o
Demand from Industry
Shortage of qualified workers
Colorado Advanced Manufacturing Alliance
Economic development
Executive Branch of Colorado state government
CSULogic is licensable software supporting integration with a wide range of networks and applications, enabling deployment across sectors and industries outside of Colorado State University
f the Colorado Badge Movement….Look Out… Here We Come
What we are Experiencing and Issues to avoid
Participatory or “achievement” badges
“Carpet badging”
Instability in metadata
Competing badges
Conflicting badging systems and procedures
Questions about badges?
CC BY License
This Workforce Solution Downsize a MOOC by Brenda M. Perea is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at www.cccs.edu.
This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration. The solution was created by the grantee and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Labor. The Department of Labor makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances of any kind, express or implied, with respect to such information, including any information on linked sites, and including, but not limited to accuracy of the information or its completeness, timeliness, usefulness, adequacy, continued availability or ownership.