Why Was The Battle Of Saratoga A Turning Point Of The...

Why Was The Battle Of Saratoga A Turning Point Of The...
The Battle of Saratoga is considered to be the major turning point of the American Revolution. As The British were attempting to separate the New
England colonies from the southern colonies, this battle proved to the world that the American army was capable of fighting and defeating the British
forces. The American victory, and the capture of a majority of British General Burgoyne's army, convinced the French that America was a legitimate
ally in the war. The Battle of Saratoga was very important because it gave America international recognition and new war tactics, such as asymmetric
warfare. As a result of this successful battle, Saratoga turned the tide of the Revolution in America's favor.
The two battles of Saratoga were fought in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Freeman's Farm is one of the decisive battles of the Revolutionary War, leading directly to Burgoyne's surrender".
The second crucial battle of Saratoga, the Battle of Bemis Heights, occurred on October 7, 1777. The start of the American revolution taking a complete
turn. General Burgoyne was determined to launch an attack on the Americans at Bemis Heights. By this time, American General Gates was reinforced
with his army of about 12,000 men versus around 4,000 British and Germans. The French Alliance changed the face of the war for the British, "the
American war for independence was now in essence a world war". France had been secretly supplying weapons and ammunition to the American
soldiers. They kept it a secret because the French didn't want a show or create an open alliance, but soon the French realized that the Patriots had an
opportunity to win the war. They were now willing to form an open alliance with the Americans against the British. The alliance with French was
critical and essential for winning the war. Without the French, the Patriots would have lost. Some benefits of the alliance were that the French provided
supplies and ammunitions to the Americans so that they could continue fighting. French also volunteered their soldiers and generals. America was now
ready for war with the British. Since Freeman's Farm, the Patriots had increased in strength. Gates' army now had
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

French Revolution Dbq
What were the most important causes of the French Revolution?
The French Revolution was a period of long ending causes and it led to many long–lasting conditions in France including political, social and
economic conditions. The French revolution was significant because it led to the end of the old monarchy. The important causes of theFrench
Revolution were the old regime, economic hardships, and the American Revolution. Thus, economic hardships, the old regime and the American
Revolution were the important causes of the French Revolution.
One major cause of the old regime were the taxes and laws between the three estates. As seen in Document 2, "the 3rd estate paid 50% of income in
taxes while the 1st and 2nd paid less than 5%" (Doc 2). This clearly shows that the most populated estate, the third estate, paid half of their income as
their taxes. Larger amounts of taxes the third estate paid versus the lower amount of taxes for the first and second estates. Another significant cause
was the unequal three estates and the third estate was overpowered. The third estate had more power in laws and taxes and their relationship with the
lower estates were not good. As demonstrated in Document 7, the cartoon of the "The political and social system in France" (Doc 7). This cartoon
proves the relationship between the third estate and the two lower estates. The lower estates didn't have anything to do with taxes and laws and the
third estates were all in laws and taxes. The final

The Battle Of Yorktown By George Washington
The Battle of Yorktown is known as the battle that separated the United States from Great Brittan. The purpose of this paper is that I will discuss the
events that led up to the battle, the battle itself, the outcome, and a specific event that, if changed, might have changed the outcome of the war. There
are multiple events that may have changed the outcome; within this paper I will discuss one, and that will be, what if George Washington's diversionary
orders didn't deceive the British. On September 28, 1781 General George Washington started his siege on Yorktown, where the British General Lord
Charles Cornwallis garrisoned his 9,000 troops. Those actions are just the final steps that won the battle and solidified the United States as an
independent nation. The real beginning of the Battle of Yorktown started in August of 1781 when the French army led by French Commander, the
Comte de Rochambeau, convinced General Washington to attack Yorktown instead of New York. The Comte de Rochambeau Stated to General
Washington, that if he was to attack New York that they would suffer a great deal of casualties due to the British's well fortification of the area and that
the attack wouldn't succeed. General Washington was convinced by his ally's concern, so on August 19, 1781 the French and United StatesContinental
Army Began their march to Yorktown in order to crush Lord Charles Cornwallis and his recent string of victories. General Washington wanted the
element of surprise when

The Strength Of The Solid Ball
The solid ball was typically used against forts and other artillery pieces. The grape shot and canister shot were utilized as anti–personnel munitions.
The Garrison Cannon used three different types of shells; hot shot, chain shot and bar shot. Hot shots were cannonballs that were heated until they
were glowing red and then fired at ships to set them ablaze. Chain shot and bar shot consisted of two cannon balls connected by either a chain or bar.
They were designed to destroy ships rigging. The mortar used only one type of shell, the bomb. The bomb was a hollow shell that was filled with
black powder and had a fuse. The howitzer utilized hollow shot and anti–personnel munitions.
In 1780, the French sent 5,500 soldiers to Rhode Island ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lafayette was the Commander of an American force consisting of nearly 3,200 Soldiers. Lafayette also reported all movements of the British Army to
General Washington. By August 1781, the British Army had established itself in Yorktown, Virginia to begin construction of the port. Shortly after,
Francois Joseph Paul de Grasse who was the Commander of the French West Indie Fleet would be given the option of attacking New York City, or
attacking Yorktown. He chooses to attack Yorktown. Upon hearing this, Washington realized the time for decisive action was upon him. He moved his
Continental Army, which was already reinforced by over 5,000 French Soldiers, to Yorktown.
The stage was set for decisive military action. In September 1781, Washington was in Yorktown with his Continental Army numbering over 8,000
Soldiers, the French Army had roughly 8,500 Soldiers, the French Navy had arrived with 29 warships, and "Cornwallis's Army took up positions in
and near Yorktown. They had dug trenches and built fortifications and gun platforms" (Fradin, 25). Cornwallis had with him over 7,500 British and
German troops. Could America and France defeat the British and win independence? Could the French Navy defeat the inevitable arrival of the British
Navy? Possibly will a combined, multi–national, land and sea military operation is successfully conducted? On September 5, 1781, the World received
the first answer, yes.
On

Battle of Yorktown Essay
Cadet Flake
11–18–2014
Battle Analysis
ROTC
Siege of Yorktown The Revolutionary War was a dreadful war leaving almost 70,000 U.S. and British soldiers dead or wounded. The war lasted eight
years with America, France, Spain, and the Dutch on one side and Great Britain on the other. On October 19, 1781 the last major land battle took place,
the Battle of Yorktown. Similar to other battles in the Revolutionary War, the Americans were fighting for independence from the British and as threats
from them kept increasing, the situation did not get any better. George Washingtonis recognized to having inspired the victory achieved over the British
forces. The tactics, skills, courage and the collaboration George Washington sought with the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The actually fighting started in 1775 in Massachusetts when British soldiers were ordered to confiscate arsenal being stored there.
Leading up the battle of Yorktown, in February, 1781, Major General Marquis de Lafayette was ordered to take his Continental troops to Virginia.
About a month later General Cornwallis and his army had entered Virginia believing that if the American forces had resistance, he would have victory
against the Americans and the French. Later that year in August on 1–2, 1781 Cornwallis and his army set up at Gloucester point, hoping to use it as a
base for supply and weapons. Couple of weeks later, Washington heard about the base and sent a large army to destroy Cornwallis base. A month
later on September 14, 1781, French General Rochambeau and General Washington arrived, and sent 400 French soldiers and 400 American soldiers
to storm the British redoubt. On October 19, 1781, being taken under heavy from the Americans and the French, Major General Cornwallis realized
that he was short of troops and decided to escape Yorktown before surrendering. Making the move to escape, a sudden storm from the Americans and
French ruined his evacuation plan and Cornwallis was forced to surrender, due to the lack troops and supplies.
On October 19, 1781, the British troops under Cornwallis surrendered to Washington's combined forces, thus ending the major battle in the American
Revolution. After the surrender of the British, all their troops were sent

The Financial Crisi of the French Revolution
"How Serious Was The Pre–Revolutionary Financial Crisis Between 1786–88, And How Significant Was The Clash Between The Notables And
Calonne In Failing To Solve It?"
On the twentieth of august 1786 Charles Alexandre de Calonne, comptroller–general of the royal finances, informed King Louis XVI that the state was
on the verge of a financial meltdown. Whilst not having exact details to the financial figures to show the full extent of the problem, it is never the less
recognized that France was in serious financial difficulty. What then did Calonne propose to sort this financial mess out? How was he to convince the
King and the Notables that France was in financial danger and to give backing to his solutions? This essay will ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Calonne raised approximately over 420 million livres from 1783–87. Yet he could hardly go on borrowing for short term investments when clearly
what was needed were long term plans to help France recover. What was then the comptroller–general to do in sorting out this dire financial situation?
Especially when so many options were closed to him. Calonne himself even stated to Louis:
"I shall easily show that it is impossible to tax further, ruinous to be always borrowing and not enough to confine ourselves to economical reformsВ…
the only effective remedy to take, the only true means of managing finally to put the finances truly in order, must consist in revivifying the entire State
by recasting all that is vicious in the constitution."2
Put simply, Calonne had come to realize that the financial problems of France were so extraordinary, that they were beyond financial problems. What
Calonne proposed to do was to rework the entire state: all institutions had to be revamped in order to save France from her financial crisis. He believed
that the state needed comprehensive organization В– as a result he felt it necessary to reform the economy, the government and possibly society in
France. Calonne states in his document to Loius:
"The disparity, the disaccord, the incoherence of the different parts of the monarchy is the

The Effects of Financial Problems on the French Revolution...
The Effects of Financial Problems on the French Revolution
The French Revolution, which broke out in 1787, was perhaps the most violent upheaval in the western world due to the extensive participation of
peasants and common people, not only the aristocracy. Even thought in other parts of Europe revolutionist movements were taking place, they were
usually between aristocratic rulers and other privileged groups. Regarding the causes of the French Revolution, several versions are proposed and
debated. Some versions say that the causes were basically social and economical; while others say it was the rise of one particular class, the bourgeoisie
. Therefore in order to attain a final answer it is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Industry and commerce were badly affected, which lead to a decline in production and employment. Apart from this, natural occurrences also helped to
ruin harvests, and even though the degree of starvation had been higher during the reign of Louis XIV, this time it had a great psychological impact on
the classes. This helped to increase even more the social gap between the bourgeoisie and the peasantry, consequently deep resentment was formed.
However this resentment was not only between the bourgeoisie and peasants, but also between the second and third states. In the attempt to solve their
difficulties, the nobility or second state, passed downwards to the bourgeoisie or third state, all the economic burden, thus widening the hostility
between the states. Even though these struggles between social classes did not have an immediate effect due to temporary restrains, it later on became
a significant cause for the breakout of the revolution.
Although each class' had its own aspirations and achievements suiting their interests, they had one common goal. As the regime was no longer serving
their interests or guaranteeing them, it had to be put down or modified. Therefore the regime, combined with other pressures, finally collapsed. Each
class then developed tactics to fulfill their interests and implement them to the new government

Regarding Indefinite Administrative Detention Essay
Regarding Indefinite Administrative Detention
Blind patriotism and resounding public support of President Bush's 'War' on terrorism after the events of September 11 th have allowed considerable
leeway to be taken by the Federal Government in terms of indefinite detention of non–U.S. citizens in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But all the flag waving
seems to have helped a lot of people dismiss the idea that, even though the detainees taken from Afghanistan in the past year are not U.S. citizens, they
remain innocent until proven guilty according to American legal principles.
One might ask: 'if the suspects haven't been proven guilty in court (or the remarkably prosecutor–friendly military tribunals), how can they be, for all
intents and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Constitution, to be protected by the 5 th Amendment Due Process clause, which "forbids the Government to "depriv[e]" any "person ... of ...
liberty...without due process of law.""(Zadvydas, III(A)) is absolutely crucial to maintaining a fair, evenhanded administration of justice by the U.S.
courts system. The U.S. Supreme Court took this into consideration when deciding Zadvydas v. Davis (2001), in which plaintiff argued that a law
regulating the lengthy detention process applied to 'deportable' aliens whose deportation/reception arrangements were still pending violated his right
to Due Process. This will be discussed in depth later. But the case was not based on constitutional issues, rather it focused on statutory laws that
define the complex procedures for holding and deporting aliens. Before an analysis of the legal reasoning used to decide Zadvydas can be
appropriately understood, one must receive a brief overview of exactly how and why this case applies to Attorney General John Ashcroft's ability to
indefinitely detain 'suspected terrorists' at Guantanamo Bay.
The complication here is that the main focus of this case is not on suspected terrorists, prisoners of war, or any issue of national security regarding
deportation of enemies of the state. The primary legal question in Zadvydas is "whether 8 U.S.C. В§1231(a)(6), a provision permitting the United
States Attorney General to detain a deportable alien

George Washington : The French And Indian War
George Washington George Washington was born February 22,1732 in Westmoreland County Virginia. He was the first president of the United States
and one of the most respected men of all time. After serving as a commander in the French and Indian war, George Washington was better equipped
to serve as a commander in chief during the Revolution because of his respected nature and his newly found military tactics. "The French and Indian
War was the North American conflict in a larger imperial war between Great Britain and France known as the Seven Years' War."("Office of the
Historian"1)
George Washingtonserved as the commander during this war. He led his troops to victory against the French. George Washington was greatly
respected because of this. All over the country people heard about his win and talked about it. Some people may wonder why George Washington was
chosen to serve as a commander during this war. "In 1753, Lieutenant Governor Dinwiddie of Virginia ordered a young, ambitious 21–year old George
Washington on mission deep into the Ohio Country to confront the French."("Mount Vernon"1) Because of his ambition to confront the French he was
well respected all over and proved himself to be chosen as the commander for the war.
The American Revolution was the war where the thirteen colonies fought for their independance from Britian. "Much more than a revolt against British
taxes and trade regulations, the American Revolution was the first modern revolution. It

Marquis De Lafayette : A French General And Hero Of The...
Marie Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier or Marquis de Lafayette was a French general and hero of the American Revolution. Excited by the
ideas of the American Revolution, Lafayette served alongside General George Washington during the revolution. Often known as a "hero of two
worlds", Lafayette gained much of his fame by successfully co–leading the American forces in the siege of Lord Cornwallis' British armies at
Yorktown. This success is what helped America win the Revolutionary War, by forcing the British to surrender and grant America their freedom.
Marquis de Lafayette was born into the Mortier family, a family of French aristocrats, on September 6, 1757, in Chavaniac, France. When
Lafayette was only two years old, his father was killed in a battle during the Seven Years War. Then, in 1770 Lafayette lost his mother, along with
his grandfather a few weeks later. Consequently, 12 year old Lafayette inherited a majority of his family's wealth. He went on to spend 3 years
studying at the Collage du Plessis, a distinguished secondary school in Paris. Later in 1771, he joined the French Army. However, Lafayette was
forced to retire 5 years later, due to strict military reforms. In 1773, Marquis de Lafayette married the 14 year old, Marie Adrienne Francoise de
Noailles, who was a member of a prominent French family. At this point in time he had not yet shown a serious interest in the political conflicts that
were occurring under the reign of King Louis XVI, but he also

How Did New York Influence Early American History
From the moment of its first colonization by Peter Stuyvesant as New Netherlands, New York State showed military promise to both the British and
the French. Colonial New York extended from the Atlantic at New York Harbor all the way north, to the great lakes on the border of the French
colonies of Quebec and Ontario, which made up the combined colony of Canada. Its great size places it perfectly in between the Southern States and
New England. Therefore, whoever controlled New York controlled the fate of both regions of the original 13 states. New York is utilized for its
geographical importance in two of the most prominent wars of early American history: The French and Indian War and The American Revolution. The
significance of New York... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Pitt now now focused on the conquest of Canada ,targeting four French forts. Of these forts, Fort Carillon, more commonly known as Fort
Ticonderoga, was the most important one. Fort Ticonderoga, located on Lake Champlain and near Lake George, provided defense against northern
access to the Hudson River, and ultimately New York Harbor. Major General James Abercromby commanded the assault on Fort Ticonderoga in the
July of 1758. Fort Ticonderoga was defended by the Marquis de Montcalm and his thirty–five hundred French and Native American troops while
Abercrombie led fifteen thousand British troops (Gilchrist). They were initially unable to overcome a French abattis, which is a field fortification
used as an obstacle made of tree branches laid in a row with the sharpened tops pointed towards the enemy. This along with trenches, greatly hindered
the British and after six failed attempts, they retreated. This was not the last of the British as they tried again in 1759 under the command of Sir
Jeffery Amherst. This attack, after learning from the previous one, was successful as French forces, without knowledge of the attack, migrated to
defend Quebec against the rest of the British campaign. By the time the French realized what was going on, it was too late and the British had
successfully taken control of Fort

How Did Ho Chi Minh Fight In Vietnam
Romulo D Blum
Essay # 1
Roots of War, Question #2
The Indochina Empire for centuries has belong to the French Empire, the French fought painful battles to take control over the region since the late
17th century. The Indochina Empire includes was is known today a North and South Vietnam, the region provided the French Empire rice, and rubber
plantations. Just after World War 1, the French discover rich deposit of coal and extended its rubber plantation to Cambodia. Having a firm grip over the
French Indochina region gave France world superiority over the rest of the world.
Unfortunately for the French during World War 2 in the 1940s, was fighting in the war against Nazi Germany. Germany defeated the French and with it
also lost control of the French Indochina Empire to Germany. The French Indochina region control was given to Japan terminating the control and
benefits the French had gained for more than a century.
After the defeat of Japan in World War 2, France saw the perfect opportunity to gained control of the French Indochina region, by that time the
Indochinese ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ho Chi Minh a war harden individual who provided support to the United States during the war to fight the Japanese, was now fighting for the
independence of North Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh made numerous attempts to reach out to President Truman to have the United Nations and world powers
to intervene and to mediate a fair settlement and bring the Indochinese issue in front of the United Nations. Ho Chi Minh pleads were completely
ignored by President Truman and the State Department.
Despite all efforts by the French to gained control of the entire Indochina region fighting the Vietminh for many years suddenly the United States
ceased all financial assistance to the French government placing a road block in regaining control of the entire region by the French. The decision of
cutting all financial assistance to the French government led to the idea of having Soldiers fight which led to war of

The Movie Marshall Movie
In the movie "Marshall" we take a look at one of Thurgood Marshall early cases. In "Marshall", Thurgood starts off at a train station getting ready to
board and some bad cats walk up to him and started screaming obscene things at Thurgood. We see Thurgood going into the NAACP office and
someone is waiting for him to tell him he will be taking a rape case in New York. Thurgood tells his wife that he will have to leave again for another
court case. So he goes to New York and enlists the help of local lawyer Samuel Friedman. Marshall needed a co–counselor based in Connecticut to help
him argue the case, someone more familiar with the laws and politics particular to the state. Sam's response wasn't to welcoming. He felt like this
was a case that could possible ruin his career. He wanted nothing to do with it. After a few movie minutes we go to see the man accused of rape.
It's an African American male named Joseph Spell. Spell is accused of raping his former boss Eleanor Strubing. Mrs.Strubing had come home
from dinner with friends. She was fresh from the shower and wearing only a robe when Spell knocked on her bedroom door and asked if he could
borrow some money. She claims Spell raped her made her get dressed took her downstairs, bound her hands and feet, and raped her again. After
forcing her to write a ransom note, he put her in the car, cut off the bottom of her dress and gagged her with the remnant, and drove until a policeman
stopped the car. The officer did not

How Did The French Revolution Change Frances Form Of...
Jacob Palomo
The French revolution How Did The French Revolution Change Frances Form Of Government? The French. revolution was huge turning point in
history of the country France it marked a change from the feudal system France used prior and the over throwing of a monarch during this time Frances
economy, government, and rule changed in the way the people decided to change it to. The French revolution first starting in modern European history
at 1789 and ending a year later in 1790, it was a important event in Frances history as well as modern European history, it started with France fighting
many wars such as the war against Prussia, great Britain and helping fight in the American revolution these wars took a heavy price on Frances ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These third estates members wanted representatives voted in and were unhappy they were being taxed the most when they made the least amount of
money. These commoners and their general of finance Jacqus Necker thought the other estates church and noblemen should be taxed more since they
had more money. They also found it unfair how they were the largest group and each group only got one vote. But once these ideas and complaints
were brought to the estates generals they could not agree. The third estate decided that if the first and second estate wouldn't listen they would form
their own national assembly where each member only got one vote. On June, 10th, 1789 they formed the national assembly, king louis the king of
France at the time tried to stop them by closing the cahiers de Doleances meeting room this caused the national assembly to meet in the indoor tennis
court where they decided to work until they had created a new constitution for France that would enable better and equal treatment for all. After the
national assembly of France was formed by the third estate in July 1789 the noblemen and the king were mad with the general of finance Jack Necker
and fired him. Many took the streets of Paris in riots and protest because they though the king was going to try to stop the national assembly. The
people of the national assembly then decided to attack the

Dbq French Revolution Research Paper
The French Revolution was a time of political and social rebellion in France. It began in 1789 because of the inequalities that existed between the rich
and the poor. Before the French Revolution a person could not work to become wealthy– they had to be born wealthy and vice versa. The French
Revolution changed this for France's citizens. Also the French Revolution resulted in freeing 10,000 African slaves. The most important cause of the
French Revolution were the Age of Enlightenment, inequality of the estate system and tax structures.
One cause of the French Revolution was the Age of Enlightenment. The Enlightenment had many different philosophs, a well known one was John
Locke(1632–1704). The philosophs would go to salons and talk about how they felt to the lower class. "The philosophs were not directly responsible
for the outbreak... but they sparked that change of thought into action" Doc 5. John Locke would go to these salons and he would say how he felt
about freedom and equality. " All mankind... being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possession"
John Locke. The Enlightenment also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In France there were three estates/classes. The first and highest class was the church(clergy and kings), the second class was the nobility(nobles)
and the third class and lowest rank was the commoners( peasants, bourgeois and city workers). There is a bar graph showing how unequal the tax
structure is and how there is a huge population of poor people. It shows that the third estate is paying most of the taxes and they owned very little
land, Doc 2. There is another photograph displaying two men labeled first and second estate standing on top of a rock labeled taxes all on top of a
man labeled third estate, Doc 7. This picture is trying to explain how the top estates are all depending on the the third estate because they pay all the
taxes and work on the

Enlightenment And The French Revolution Essay
How and to what extent did Enlightenment ideas about religion and society shape the policies of the French Revolution in the period 1789 to 1799? In
1789, France was the heart of Enlightenment thought, however, in addition to this, the government was corrupt and there were growing socioeconomic
tensions throughout the country. This corruption and tension between the classes fueled the French Revolution. The motto of the Revolution,
"LibertГ©, Г‰galitГ©, FraternitГ©", had deep roots in the ideas and works of Enlightenment Philosophers such as Jean–Jacques Rousseau and John
Locke. Enlightenment ideas about religion and society played a major role in the creation and purpose of the new policies from the Revolution.
Rousseau, Locke, and Montesquieu... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the Two Treatises of Government, Locke argues that the purpose of government is to protect the state and the quality of life of the people, and that
no ruler should ever have absolute power. To prevent absolute rule, Locke insisted on checks and balances, which the French monarchy lacked. One of
Locke's most controversial points in terms of the old French regime was that government should be selected by the people, rather than be determined by
the divine succession based on bloodlines. He argued that the role of the government was to abide by the general will, which meant that the citizens of
a state had the power to appoint new leaders when unhappy with the current government. The Two Treatises of Government provided the unhappy and
frustrated French citizens with solutions for major issues, as well as justification for acting against the monarchy. In 1789, as a result of Enlightenment
influence, the French population acted against the monarchy, and the first stage of the French Revolution began. The reforms made by the French
National Assembly such as the elimination of clerical and noble privilege, creation of a constitutional government, limitation of Monarchical power,
and enforcement of equality among the citizens, were greatly influenced by Lockean

Napoleon Bonaparte Revolutionary Hall Of Fame
To the Admissions Board of the Revolutionary Hall of Fame,
It is with great pleasure that I recommend Napoleon Bonaparte to be inducted into the Revolutionary Hall of Fame. Bonaparte was not only the French
General of the French Army but, more importantly, an emperor that was charismatic and diligent who was successful in the reunification of the French
empire and established a stable connect between the church and the state after the effects of the French Revolution.
Napoleon Bonaparte excelled as his role of the emperor of France. Before that, he was a game changing First Consul and revolutionary French General
of the French Army. He was diligent and cunning when it came to military plans and military campaigns. Napoleon Bonaparte also

The Siege Of Yorktown: The Art Of Warfighting
From the earliest recorded history, humans have waged war upon one another. To conquer and expand their empires, military leaders have experimented
with hundreds upon hundreds of tactics and theories about how to wage these wars. The United States Army has refined and crafted the science of
warfare and the art of leadership, designing six 'warfighting functions' that interrelate with each other. These warfighting functions shape the way an
United States Army Officer plans for combat. The six warfighting functions are Mission Command, Movement and Maneuver, Intelligence, Fires,
Sustainment, and Protection. The use of these functions can be directly related to the success of many victories the United States has seen, not only on
the War level, but also for specific battles. In researching the Siege of Yorktown, it is clear to see that these warfighting functions were key to the
victory of the siege. This decisive victory legitimized the then freshly founded United States of America. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Using the skills of Movement and Maneuver, General Washington was able to move his forces to surround General Cornwallis' forces in the
Chesapeake Bay. Using Movement and Maneuver, the rebel troops were able to obtain a relative advantage over the enemy. The advantage the
troops now had was that they had trapped Cornwallis against the sea, and they also were able to later have the French Armada prevent the British
from attempting to escape by sea. Using these key tactics, the British were unable to leave, or to receive aid. These dire circumstances were one of the
factors that led to a

Cinco De Mayo Essay
Cinco de Mayo means the fifth of May. It is not an independence day for Mexico like most unknowledgeable people think. Mexican Independence
Day is celebrated on the 15th of September. Mexico declared independence from Spain on the 24th of August 1821. Cinco de Mayo is not an American
holiday either. Mexico and the United States savor this holiday because it is the day where Mexican peasants/ commoners defeated the French and
Mexican traitor army that double them in size in Puebla, Mexico one hundred miles away from Mexico city on the 5th of May, 1862.
The French had landed in Mexico along with Spanish and English troops five months earlier to collect unpaid debts. In 1855Benito Juarez (minister of
justice) issued reforms called ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is also said that Napoleon wanted to check the powers of the United States before it got too powerful.
Napoleon also brought in a new Hapsburg prince who he thought would help him rule the Mexican Empire. His name was Maximilian and his wife's
name was Carolota. Napoleon's army hadn't been defeated in over 50 years.
The French army invaded Mexico with the finest and most modern day armory and ammunition. They also had a newly constituted foreign legion. The
French, at the time feared no one.
The French then left the port of Vera Cruz to attack Mexico City from the west. The French thought that the Mexicans would give up should their
capitol fall to the enemy as the European countries traditionally did. Under the command of Texas born General Zaragosa, and under Calvary
command of Colonel Porfirio Diaz, later to be Mexico's president and dictator, they awaited the French.
The French wore bright and stylish colors, opposed to the Mexicans. General Zaragosa ordered colonel Diaz to take his Calvary, the best in the world at
that time, out to the French flanks. The French in response sent their Calvary to chase them. As a consequence to the French they were butchered, and
the remaining infantrymen tried one last time to charge the Mexicans in unfavorable terrain and stampeding cattle and lost. The Mexican's were
victorious and Diaz's superb horsemen chased the remaining French off.
By the Mexican's

Compare And Contrast French Revolution And Haitian Revolution
During the Age of Revolution, several colonies and nations underwent many major reforms and changes. The French overthrew an absolute monarch
and shortly thereafter the Haitians seceded from their mother country, France. Although the reforms of the two nations during the revolutions were
different, the French and Haitian Revolutions were remarkably similar in the fact that the Enlightenment and nationalism both played significant roles.
The French Revolution was ended with the end of absolutism and the reign of Napoleon, while the Haitian Revolution ended when Napoleon loosened
the reigns and allowed Haiti to become an independent country. The French government consisted of the king and the Estates General, which allowed
the clergy, nobility ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the French Revolution, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen was written and many actions were completed with Enlightenment
philosophies, such as those by Rousseau, Voltaire and Montesquieu. Rousseau wrote the Social Contract, which opposed absolutism and stated that the
government should only, and can only govern with the consent of the governed. This idea was heavily supported and spread, as the Third Estate was
not properly represented in the Estates General. King Louis XVI continuously abused his power by over–taxing the Third Estate and bribed the nobles
and clergy, the first and second estate respectively, into siding with him. Voltaire's philosophies were that there should be freedom of speech and
religion, as well as, a separation of church and state. During the French revolution, his philosophies were the justification behind the beheading of
Robespierre, and the pact made by Napoleon with the Roman Catholic Church, also known as the Concordat. Montesquieu's idea of separation of
power influenced the equal administrative powers of the French government so that one branch could not overpower another. The Haitian Revolution
was influenced by the Enlightenment's idea of equality and Locke's natural rights of man. The island of Haiti was a colony of France which produced
sugar, along with other cash crops, and provided trade supplies

Ollie's Barbecue: Supreme Court Case
The case here at hand was argued October 5th of 1964. The issue was one that dealt with Ollie's Barbecue and its owner Ollie McClung in Alabama
and the refusal of black patrons coming inside to dine–in. Ollie's only allowed take out to black customers, even though the majority of employees
were black. With the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was handed down in July, Congress along with Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach
were arguing that a clear violation of Title II of the Act was being committed by McClung. This case was close in distinction and timing of the Heart
of Atlanta Motel case brought before the Supreme Court, as they were argued at the same time. "Section 201 (a) of Title II commands that all persons
shall be entitled to... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ten years prior we had Brown v. The Board of Education, which a few of the same Justices serving on Katzenbach v. McClung were on, that stated that
"separate educational facilities is inherently unequal". Then, with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 we saw the outlawing of segregation and discrimination
in public places. This was put to the test by two small southern businesses that claimed Congress had no right to interfere with their local
establishments, but the Supreme Court did right by upholding the constitution, and it seemed to be a no brainer as seen by the unanimous decision by
the court. It was tense time and shameful part of our history, but without decisions made by these men we might not be where we are today. Racism
and discrimination still exist all over the globe to this day. We have come a long way though, and if it wasn't for people continuing to do the right thing
whether they are a majority or minority then we wouldn't have the freedoms that we have today. The Supreme Court got it right with this decision, not
just by upholding the Constitution, but for our Country and Humanity in

Emergency Center Patients For Primary Care Via Telehealth
Redirecting Emergency Center Patients to Primary Care via Telehealth PILOT: Regional Health Command– Atlantic (Provisional) Background:
RHC–A (P) and Telehealth (TH) Service Line The Regional Health Command– Atlantic (Provisional) (RHC–A), is one of five US Army Medical
Commands (MEDCOM) under the Office of the Army Surgeon General (OASG) that oversees the day–to–day operations of all the Military Training
Facilities (MTFs) in the region. With an operating budget of $2 billion and over 600,000 beneficiaries, the RHC–A is the biggest regional command,
spanning 27 states plus Puerto Rico. Its vision, to strengthen the health of our Nation by improving the health of our Army, is carried out through its
mission of providing proactive,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As stated by former ASG, Patricia D. Horoho, "telehealth is the future of medicine..." and significant strategic investments have been made in TH
providers and staff, program support, research and development and technology due to the tremendous value that TH brings to the military (ATH,
2015). TH is the use of telecommunications and information technologies to connect people to healthcare across distance. Both synchronous
(real–time) and asynchronous (store–and–forward) technologies allows for the distribution of electronic health information, services, and education
between providers and patients and/or providers and providers (ATH, 2015). The use of telephone, Internet, interactive radio and video equipment,
remote sensory devices or robotics are all tools of TH. Encompassing over 30 specialties including psychiatry, neurosurgery, dermatology, radiology,
pharmacy and nutrition, the RHC–A is continuously working on testing and building its capabilities in terms of policies, processes, organization,
products, and systems in order to provide safe, high quality care both in garrison and in deployed locations (RHC–A(P), 2016). Problem and Response
Emergency departments in military hospitals experience overcrowding and extensive wait times due to space constraints, budget cuts and a shortage of
providers. Telehealth may allow for a cost and time effective alternative to providing medical services to military members and

Causes of the French Revolution Essay
"Liberty, equality, fraternity, or death;– the last, much the easiest to bestow, O Guillotine!"
–– Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities
Reflect upon your lifetime. Was there ever a moment where you felt mistreated, or unequally represented? Maybe it's that your boss listens to your
other coworkers and not you. Or that you feel like the government is listening to corporative powers and not the people. Inequality fosters resentment.
How would you feel if your voice wasn't heard? The concept of inequality is not exclusive to the French Revolution. In fact, these variations are seen
within our modern relationships, social structures, and political structures–a few of which are outlined above. In regards to the French Revolution, the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before we analyze what factor most influenced the start of the French Revolution, it must be acknowledged that although many factors had a role in
the outbreak of the Revolution, not all factors were equally responsible. I believe that the political and social discrepancies within the country of
France were the most significant element in leading up to the French Revolution. As explained before, many historians believe that the French
Revolution was a result of the tensions felt within the Third Estate. This emphasis on a singular group in France's political system limits one's ability
to fully analyze the tensions of the time. Instead, by taking place during a period of Enlightenment, the time of the French Revolution was a dynamic
point in European History. Many accredit this enlightening as being what allowed the French commoners to evolve from being obedient laborers of
the state to leaders of a countrywide revolt. However, regardless of what infused a sense of revolution in France's societally–recognized lesser class,
without general stratification of the country and the conditions that bred inequality, the newfound furor to revolt would not have sparked any interest.
Others magnify the situation even moreso than looking at just the First or Second or Third Estate and look directly at the rule of Louis XVI as being
the determining factor in the Revolution. Although the king ruled over France and held the most power, and even though

French Revolution Dbq
the French revolution began in 1789 and ended in 1799. Louis XVI was King of France in 1789. Louis was a kind man, but he was raised to be a
king and had little knowledge of common people. There was a story in France that when Louis' wife, Marie Antoinette, heard that the people had no
bread, she said, "Let them eat cake." Marie Antoinette never said that, but it shows how little she knew (and some say cared) about life for the
common people of France.
Louis needed help in 1789. The nation had endured a long, hard winter and most of the crops were lost. The treasury was bankrupt after supporting
America in their revolution. Louis had to raise money. He could not tax the peasants, because they had no money, so he had to tax the aristocrats and
the middle class. Louis knew the people would revolt if he raised taxes on his own, so he asked the states–general to advise him. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The states–general advised the king on difficult decision, but no French king has called the states general in 179 years. The states–general voted as a
class. The first class was the clergy and the second was the nobility. A third class was made up of the "middle class," a group shopkeepers and
craftsmen who were neither rich nor poor. Usually, the clergy and the nobility voted to support whatever the king wanted, so the vote of the middle
class did not matter. The middle class argued that voting should be "by head" rather than by class, because they had more representatives than the first
two estates combined. Louis agreed, and the "National Assembly"

French And Indian War Causes
The French and Indian War was caused by the French repeatedly encroaching on the British colonies of the Ohio River Valley. The French were
building Forts all along the Ohio River with intent to take possession of it. After hearing this the Governor of Virginia sent 150 soldiers to reinforce a
fort located where the two rivers met. George Washington was the second in command of this small army but was then promoted to the commander
after the commander died. Washington grouped up with a Seneca Indian ally and launched a surprise attack on the French killing the commander and
some of his men, the rest were taken as prisoners. While Washington was occupying the fort the French and their Indian allies launched an assault; they
killed a third of Washington's men and left him no choice but surrender.
After Washington returned he was still praised a hero, and Benjamin Franklin blamed the loss on the present state of the colonies. He also believed that
if the colonies did not unite that they would lose the war. England also saw the need for the colonies to unite, so it asked colonies to send delegates to
Albany, New York. Only seven colonies agreed to this but told their delegates not to agree with any colony confederation. Benjamin Franklin was one
of the delegates that went there with a paper known as the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An English general, Edward Braddock, lead a small group of colonists and joined up with the British army to make another attempt on Fort
Duquesne. Washington warned Braddock not to use traditional techniques when facing the French and their allies, but Braddock did not heed this
warning. Braddock and two thirds of his men soon fell in battle because of an ambush the French and their allies set up. The French and their allies
did well in the first year of the war because of their series of raids, where they killed many colonists and drove other from house and

Why Is Thurgood Marshall Significant
What was the short term significance of Thurgood Marshall in 1947–1967?
Thurgood Marshall was significant as he was the first African–American to be appointed a position in the U.S Supreme Court, in 1967. His
significance to civil rights is evident between 1947 and 1967, in one contemporary newspaper he was even referred to as "Mr Civil Rights". In
1947–1961 Thurgood worked as the NAACP's lawyer, where he argued his most famous cases – Brown v Topeka (1954) and Browder v Gayle (1956).
Furthermore, the appointments by both, President John F. Kennedy and President Johnson, are significant in themselves because he was the first
African–American to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Despite his influence on the civil rights movement, Thurgood took a lot of criticism which
effected his attitudes towards other people involved with the civil rights movement and, in general.
Thurgood Marshall's position in the Supreme Court as the NAACP's lawyer is extremely significant. The segregation within school systems
following the "separate but equal" legislation passed by the court, Plessy v Ferguson case, was something he continuously challenged. In 1934 he
first represented the NAACP as their lawyer in the court case of Murray v Pearson, following this he was successful in winning 29 of 32 civil rights
cases against the Supreme Court in 1950s. The most famous cases he argued were Browder v Gayle (1956) and Brown v Board of Education (1954),
in these cases he was able to adjust and change

Compare And Contrast The French And Indian War
The French and Indian War took place on the continent of North America between the years 1754 and 1763 and was part of an even larger conflict in
Europe that involved England, Russia, France, Spain, and Prussia. The French and Indian War was the last of the four wars fought between England
and France over colonial supremacy. Chronologically, these wars are King William's War (1689
–1697), Queen Anne's War (1702–1713), King George's
War (1744–1748), and lastly The French and Indian War (1754–1763). The French and Indian War, although the first half had France winning,
ultimately turned to favor the British as they gained a new secretary of state, William Pitt, and moved their military focus from the war in Europe to the
war in North America.
The British and French had a considerable amount of tension between one another as both sought to develop their spheres of influence in North
America, which at the time had England controlling thirteen colonies along the northeastern coast and France controlling a large section of land
spanning from Louisiana all the way north to Canada. What sparked that tension into becoming a war was the indistinguishable marking of territory
and the Ohio Country, a land full of potential that lay between English and French territories and was at the time inhabited by Indian nations.
Before the war had started, both the French and the British had thought the Ohio Country to be rightfully theirs and so the French, strategic in their
planning, moved much quicker than ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because the New England colonies had an incentive to join in arms against the French, Britain gained an advantage; for once the British had the ability
to muster enough men to take on the French in a confrontation and win, both at Fort BeausГ©jour and later in the Battle of Lake

The European Theater Of World War II
In the European theater of World War II, 1942 marked the dominance of the Axis powers. German forces in the Soviet Union had reached Stalingrad
and threatened the oil fields of the Caucasus; Axis forces in Africa seemed on the verge of pushing the British out of Egypt; and German U–boat wolf
packs preyed on Allied shipping with relative impunity [1]. Late in 1942, however, two significant Allied successes served to turn the tide against the
Axis powers. At El Alamein, a British offensive defeated General Erwin Rommel's Afrika Korps, while almost simultaneously a huge Anglo
–American
force landed in North Africa to contest Axis control; Operation Torch. The operation marked the first time that British and American forces worked
together on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both the Axis and Allies saw overseas French forces as the decisive advantage that would allow them to achieve their differing objectives in the
Mediterranean.
In North Africa, General Field Marshal Erwin Rommel and his Afrika Korps, allied with the weak Italian army, had pushed the British eastward into
capturing the Western Desert area of Libya and Alexandria, Egypt [9]. The British Eighth Army was still a viable force in Egypt, but had been on the
defensive for some time and would not regain the initiative until late 1942, with the British victory at El Alamein, immediately prior to the Torch
landings [9].
Strategic negotiations between U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill led to an agreement to send American
troops to North Africa in late 1942 to strengthen British interests in the Mediterranean, and open a second front to take pressure off Russia on the
Eastern Front. In return, the British would further American plans to defeat Hitler in Europe by supporting a major cross–Channel attack [4].
Inception of Operation Torch: In 1942, having been persuaded of the impracticality of launching an invasion of France as a second front, American
commanders agreed to conduct landings in northwest Africa with the goal of clearing the continent of Axis troops and preparing the way for a future
attack on southern Europe. Intending to land in

General Cornwallis Research Paper
General Cornwallis from Grosvenor Square, London was forty–five years old when the Revolutionary War ended. He was promoted to lieutenant
general and began service in the colonies under Major General Henry Clinton. When the British army was retreating to Yorktown, George Washington
was marching his troops down from the north. The French Navy, having defeated the British Navy, started to move to the coast near Yorktown, as well.
The British army was now surrounded at Yorktown. The British were also outnumbered by the French and American troops. Eventually, General
Cornwallis sent out the white flag and surrendered. The Patriot victory at Yorktown effectively ended fighting in the American colonies. Peace
negotiations began in 1782, and on

The Causes Of The French Revolution
The French Revolution was an insurgency in France from 1789 to 1799. It prompted the finish of the government, and to many wars. A turning point of
occasion in current European history, the French Revolution started in 1789 and finished in the late 1790s. Louis XVI was executed in 1793.
During the eighteenth Century France was the focus point of despotic government. The French Monarchs had boundless power and they announced
themselves as the "Representative of God". Louis XIV was the type of this view. The French Monarch's drew in themselves in sumptuous and
indulgence at the regal court of Versailles. They delighted in boundless power. By the Letter de Cachet, they captured any individual whenever and
detained them. They gave careful consideration towards their subjects. After Louis XV, Louis XVI rose the position of authority of France. During
that period, the monetary state of France ended up plainly feeble. Louis XVI was a blameless and basic man. However, he was affected by his ruler
Marie Antoinette who dependably meddled in the state undertakings.
The Social state of France during the eighteenth century was exceptionally hopeless. The then French Society was isolated into three classes–the
Clergy, Nobles and Everyday citizens. The Clergy had a place with the Main Home. The Pastorate was subВdivided into two gatherings,. the higher
clergy and the lower clergy. The higher clergy possessed the best position in the general public. They dealt with the houses of

Essay On Battle Of Yorktown
Micheal sullivan
8th grade English
Mrs.King
November 24,2015
1781 Battle of Yorktown
They won the war at sara troops and because they won the british started planning their next battle.General goerge washington commanding a force of
17,000 french and continental troops in a siege known as the battle of yorktown against british general lord charles with the british have around nine
thousand men.In a stroke of luck for the patriots the french fleet commanded by Francois departed for the chesapeake bay,at his base the united states
was seen as a free independent state eight years after the war ended.Williamburgs–troops joind up with marquis de lafyette and marched torwards
yorktown.Cornwallis tried to attack,was beaten back by the French and Americans and he relized that if he didnt surrender his army would be
completly gone.Cornwallis surrendered on October 19th which ended the final battle of the Revolutionary War
Washington realized that he could bombard the british ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The battle of yorktown the war's end as on October 19 1781.The battle of yorktown began late september 1781.The British General sent pleas for
troop reinforcements and even considered ferrying his men across the river to safety.In 1783 Treaty of Paris the british agreed to reginozie American
Independeance as far west as the Mississippi river.General Cornwallis said he was sick and didnt show up to surrender so Cornwallis sent General
Charles O'Hara to surrender his

Rudy Giuliani Is The Embodiment Of An American Dream?
Rudy Giuliani is the embodiment of an America Dream. Rudy climbed the political ladder and now lies as president–elected global chair of
cybersecurity (CNN Library). People who are in the public eye and in politics are at times involved in a scandal or multiple scandals. Scandals have
been present since the beginning of time and can very much affect your credibility and your public response to any of your further doings. Rudy Giuliani
did experience a similar scandal to John Proctor from The Crucible and many others have too but, each situation is different and unique to their own.
Growing up in Brooklyn and having a father who owned a tavern could easily affect your views on politics. Giuliani's family came to the United States
of America from Italy and they are a family of working–class and are Catholics. Giuliani's father, Harold Angel Giuliani, was a member of an organized
crime group. Giuliani (father), would later be convicted of assault and robbery. This would later foreshadow on this position and responsibility on
crime once he became mayor of New York in 1941– 2001. Before any of his political career, Giuliani attended Catholic High School. Religion was
very important to Giuliani as was to Proctor, as he stated in The Crucible, "God sees my name; God knows how black my sins are" (Miller 142). In
the beginning Giuliani wanted to be a priest but in time his fond for law grew. He would later attend New York City University of Law and pursue his
dream. After

The Battle Of Siege Of Yorktown
September 5th, 1781, a French Naval Fleet inhabited the lower Chesapeake Bay, which was a major advantage to the continental army. The siege of
Yorktown, was the last major battle against the British army under General Cornwallis, resulting in the inevitable surrender and American
independence. There was a great deal of coordination prior to the actual engagement consequently leading to this outcome. The total number of soldiers
consisted of 17,600 American and French soldiers, under the command of General George Washington, Marquis de Lafayette, Comte de Rochambeau,
and Rear Admiral Francois Joseph Paul, the Comte de Grasse lead a French Naval Fleet. 8,300 British forces were commanded by General Charles
Earl Cornwallis with 7,000 additional forces sent from General Sir Henry Clinton in New York. Unfortunately for the British, the reinforcements
arrived too late. According to General Cornwallis, the British failed their mission as a result of lack of reinforcements from Clinton. Middleton stated
(2013), "However, it is wrong to blame Clinton alone for Yorktown" (p.387). Various factors led to the defeat of both British Generals. The lack of
communications and insubordination of authority caused their defeat. This was the truth for the battle of Yorktown. At the time of the American
Revolution, both American rebels and the British practiced a variety of methods for keeping written communications secret. Both sides had a networks
of spies who passed on information right under

Toussaint Louverture's Stand Against Slavery In Haiti
In the late eighteenth century, Haiti was in a state of turmoil among the African slaves and French plantation masters, and as the conflict rose, a black
man known as Toussaint Louverture rose to the occasion to free his people from the shackles of slavery. A former slave once referenced to as nothing
more than a simple black man was deemed by many as "one of the black chiefs of Hayti' after his death and won international renown. Toussaint
Louverture, born a slave on the islands of Saint Domingo, turned a band of runaway slaves with nothing more than the clothes on their back into a
fighting force that outsmarted Napoleon Bonaparte in the first and only successful slave revolt. As Louverture became a growing figure of the
movement to abolish slavery in Haiti, both the Americas and Europe recognized him as the most influential 'hero' to inspire the possibility of freedom
from slavery could one day be achieved. Louverture's stand against slavery in 1801 left a lasting impact in Haiti by delivering the country to
emancipation with Louverture's and Dessalines' constitution ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1804, enfranchisement was declared in Haiti, although Louverture fell victim to the calumny of Bonaparte and died in Fort De Joux as a martyr.
The Haitian Revolution was the only successful slave insurgency, therefore emphasizing the will of Toussaint Louverture and his general Dessalines, as
even in the face of an infantry ten times the number of their troops they prevailed. Toussaint Louverture was in no state of wealth or power at the time
of his political rise, but in the height of his ascendancy acquired twenty thousand faithful troops.Toussaint Louverture's leadership and the revolution
paved the way for African American rights for the future principle of equal rights for all colors. Haiti's independence was declared by not the civilians,
but rather the slaves it

Vietnam War 1954 Research Paper
DIEN BIEN PHU WAR 1954
May 7, 2016, sixty two years ago this week, French troops were defeated at Vietnamese forces
at Dien Bien Phu. On May 7, 1954, after two months fighting with forces of the Viet Minh, 8000
French troops still alive in 12 mile–long Dien Bien Phu valley in northwest Vietnamese bound by
Viet Minh army, a lot of French soldier died, more than 3000 French troops died in the battle
"basin to hell", more than 4000 more died in captivity. As historian Julian Jackson explains, it
was a point in the history that turning destiny of both nations. French lost this battle and had to
get out of Vietnam country. Vietnam's Dien Bien Phu 1954 victory ended the colony of French
in Viet Nam land. This battle was a battle that America... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
So many Viet Minh
soldier that sacrificed themselves to create the victory for Viet Nam, to end the colony of
French in Viet Nam, also they show for all the Nations in the world that Viet Nam is a strong and
powerful country, we own our land and no one can take it away from us. We died in glory, in
pride, we did not senseless sacrificed, we win our freedom, our freedom was the reward,

Vietnam, our county was the reward, Vietnam people stand up and free their dear country, free
their lands, no one can take Vietnam away from Vietnam people, Vietnam people fight till their
last breathe, they will never give up, never give up the destiny or never give up French. Nothing
is worth than our country's freedom. Victory of Dien Bien Phu war will change whole Vietnam
people lives. They were suppressed so long time, they want to get out, want their freedom.
They want French get out of their lands, here is their country. They own their country. Viet
Minh and Vietnamese people want to win and really do their best to win this war, they want

French Absolute Monarchy
In the centuries preceding the French revolution, France was an absolute monarchy renowned for its power, wealth and efficiency. The French kings
maintained this power by establishing the Estates General, an assembly composed of representatives from the French nobility, church and mercantile
classes. All three classes served a key role, in exchange for a complete tax emption the French nobility provided professional soldiers to protect France's
vulnerable borders while the Catholic Church administered the legal system and the lower class merchants financed the government with their tax
money. By cooperating with these groups, the French monarchs ensured that their power was never is jeopardy (Fields, O'Neil and Share 155–156).
However, by the fifteenth century the French monarchy had grown increasingly centralized, allowing the king to expand France's borders significantly
while greatly boosting his own popularity and influence. As a result, the French monarchs where able to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By the 18th century, France's imperialist conquests and the royal family's expensive luxury consumption put a significant strain on France's finances.
To compensate, taxes on the French lower classes where raised significantly, badly damaging France's economy and causing major famines. Louis
XVI, France's monarch at the time, attempted to end this downward spiral by calling the estates general to order for the first time in generations,
believing that the conservative clergy and nobles would shore up support for his rule. Instead, the lower class merchants demanded that they be given
more power in the Estates General due to them composing the overwhelming majority of France's population (Fields, O'Neil and Share 155–159). The
king's refusal of their demands, coupled with France's ongoing famine and high taxes, enraged the French lower classes leading to the end of the
French monarchy in its

Why Is Nane Offensive Important
Alexander Usi
Lieutenant Nann
Sea Power and Maritime Affairs
19 February 2017
United States Marines at Belleau Wood In May of 1918 the German army launched the Aisne offensive. The Allies believed that city of Paris was in
danger and in response the French army, commander in chief, General PГ©tain sent 16 allied division which included the United States (U.S.) 2nd
Division to halt the German advance. The 4th Marine Brigade was a part of the U.S. 2nd division, and like many U.S. units with the Allied
Expeditionary Force (AEF), had little or no combat experience. The French and British thought lowly of U.S. troops since they had been untested in
modern combat up to that point. In the end the battle, which was primarily fought by U.S. troops, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
troops first arrived in Europe they had never fought a modern war by Allied standards, this led to a rift not only in the troops on the ground but in
the Allied command. General John Pershing was the commanding General of the AEF. Under orders from the U.S. Secretary of War Newton
Baker, Pershing was instructed to field an American army and not allow American men to be turned over to other Allied units. This idea collided
with the British and French who wanted men, rather than an untested army which lacked experience. The British and French commanders tried
repeatedly to coerce Pershing into changing his mind. When General Ferdinand Foch asked Pershing if he'd rather see the Germans advance past
Loire rather then send his men to British and French units, Pershing replied, "Yes." (Asprey 62) The situation was no better in the field. French and
British officers watched as American troops trained in a fashion that they believed over exerted troops. Colonel Rozet of the French army was
especially irritated by American troops, "[indulging] the illusion that [they] can not profit by the counsel and example of excellent French officers
who have made war for nearly four years; [they have] never made war." (Asprey 63) American troops also viewed their counterparts as hung onto bad
strategy of trench warfare that dominated the overall strategy of the war. General Pershing believed that what was needed was open combat to break
the stalemate. The lack of respect from the

George Washington's Strategy After The Revolutionary War
"An extra ration of liquor to be issued to every man tomorrow, to drink Perpetual Peace, Independence and Happiness to the United States of
America."–George Washington. Britain's surrender at Yorktown sent a shockwave of relief and optimism through the colonies. The Continental Army
in unison with their allies attained an unforeseen victory against a prestigious Redcoat army. General George Washington's polished sense of leadership
propelled the army uphill to victory. Capitalization on Britain's mistakes under General Cornwallis proved key in obtaining victory. Geopolitical factors
frequently hindered military advance, thus fabricating a conflict of strategy. The Revolutionary War officially concluded upon the signing of the Treaty
of Paris ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Augmented by their French Allies the Continental Army embarked south towards British occupied Virginia. France's alignment with theUnited States
was motivated by their loss to the British in the Seven Years' War. Historian John Grainger remarks, "The most important element was the extraordinary
achievement of brining several forces, naval and military, French, American, and British, all together at one point." Upon the arrival of the Continental
Army in Williamsburg, 13 miles outside of Yorktown, the British were fighting a two–front war. British General, Henry Clinton, occupied New York,
while Cornwallis remained in Virginia with a force of eight thousand. General Cornwallis and his men were to ensure a protected harbor for British
fleet in the Chesapeake Bay. The Continental Army comprised of eighteen thousand soldiers, a key facet of rebel success. Heavily outnumbered and
outgunned, a distressed Cornwallis urgently pleaded to Clinton for reinforcements. The northern front responded with a fleet of five thousand,
however they arrived subsequent to British defeat. "On October 19, in a spectacle incredible to all who witnessed it, most of Cornwallis' army
marched out of Yorktown between two lines of allied soldiers–Americans on one side and French on the other." In this moment, the power of alliance
became visible. Without the support of the French army, Washington and his troop would not have been triumphant at

The Union Of Notables And Brienne
After Brienne was appointed, the Assembly of Notables was dissolved and Brienne took the edited reform package to the Parlama. The Parlama
approved the first parts of the package, but when it came to the land tax there was a problem. The Parlama contended that they could not approve a
new tax. That would have to be done by an Estates General. The Estates General was when representatives from the three estates came together to
approve legislation. According to French law new taxes could only be approved by said assembly. The king did not approve of them stalling on this
very important issue of state and exiled the Parlama from Paris. Eventually the Parlama reached a compromise and was allowed back. The
compromise helped the kingdom a bit, but was nothing like the reforms needed to restore financial solvency. When the Parlama returned, deliberations
continued. On one occasion King Louis XVI attended one of the meetings. Right in the middle, he ordered the Parlama to sign the proposal. This was
completely unprecedented and a few members began to protest. However the Parlama reluctantly signed the part of the proposal they were discussing.
They continued to protest though, so the king called the Estates General. In the meantime, Brienne worked to undermine the authority of the now
detrimental Parlama. Before the May edicts were issued several members of the Parlama found out and were arrested. The May edicts set up a new
court system that reduced the Parlama's power. The

Why Was The Battle Of Saratoga A Turning Point Of The...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Candace Daigle

More from Candace Daigle (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Why Was The Battle Of Saratoga A Turning Point Of The...