A Critique On The Blank Slate, The Noble Savage And The...

A Critique on the Blank Slate, the Noble Savage and the...
A Critique on
The Blank Slate, The Noble Savage and The Ghost in the Machine. There are three doctrines which
have attained sacred status in modern intellectual life. The Blank Slate, a loose translation of the
medieval Latin term tabula rasa, scraped tablet, commonly attributed to John Locke which delves
into the opposing of political status quos and social arrangements, stating mainly that the mind is
like a sheet of white paper void of all characters and ideas, furnished with words through
experience; it denounced the differences seen among races, including the institution of slavery as
slaves could no longer be thought of as innately inferior, ethnic groups, sexes and individuals for the
differences come not from the innate ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thinking of it gives me shivers as it implies that we are beings far greater than we imagined. And as
good as it may sound, I think it appeals to man's egotistic nature; we as humans who have done
things, good and evil, try to look for a sound explanation to ease our consciences. I cannot say that
the idea does not appeal to me yet I cannot also say that I do agree with it; on the other hand, of the
three doctrines, I agree the most with the doctrine of The Noble Savage. I do believe that in our true
nature, we are savages but that does not mean that we did not know how to control ourselves; indeed
it would seem that the Native Americans, the specific race of people that the Europeans based the
doctrine of The Noble Savage on, had a better society than we did: they were less barbaric, no
employment problems and substance abuse, even crime was nearly nonexistent. And even if there
were hard times, life was definitely stable and predictable. And yet that in itself was the reason why
man chose to come out of his "savage" nature; he wanted adventure, twist and turns in his life; he
wanted to feel the thrill of living. There is nothing wrong with that but for every choice there is a
price to pay and the price we paid was high even if it remains to be seen
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Analysis Of ' Tabula Rasa ' By Robert Southey
"What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice, and everything nice, that's what little girls, are made
of. What are little boys made of? Snips and snails, and puppy dog tails. That's what little boys are
made of". Author: English Poet Robert Southey (1774–1843).
"Tabula rasa" this is how the educationalist John Locke, (1632) believed children were born, with a
"blank slate" beginning their lives morally neutral. He also wrote that "the little and almost
insensible impressions on our tender infancies have very important and lasting consequences. He
argued that the "associations of ideas" that one makes when young are more important than those
made later because they are the foundation of the self. Locke, (1632) also argued that because a
baby's mind was so malleable a parent could mould them with careful diligence. However Kohlberg
(2004) was one of the first theorists to address gender as a learned, cognitive concept. His thinking
was influenced by Piaget, who portrayed children as active learners who use interactions with their
environment to construct an understanding of the world around them (Piaget, 1961). Kohlberg
believed that children's cognitive understanding of gender influenced their behaviour (Kohlberg,
1981).
Walking into any new–born infant's room you could almost certainly guess the gender of the baby
just from the colour of his or her clothes, blankets, and toys. Any infant surrounded by pink items is
virtually certain to be a girl, whereas a child

Study Of Humanity : Feral And Neglected Children
Studies in Humanity: Feral and Neglected Children The question of what makes man human has
been asked for as long as man has been able to record his thoughts in writing. Many people believe
that humans are superior to all other beings due to their ability to communicate thoughts through
speech and on paper, or because of their capacity for empathy. In any case, we as humans are sure it
is obvious that we exist in a plane far beyond that of any non–human. So what happens when the
line between these planes becomes blurred and human is almost indistinguishable from animal in
every way except appearance? Scientists have documented cases of human children behaving as
animals – with no knowledge of human care, language, or civilization – and ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
He was very short and appeared young – around 11 years of age, walked upright, and was unable to
speak (Shattuck 15). The boy responded positively to human affection, such as hugs and smiles, and
seemed to know that fire was used for cooking food, suggesting he was not entirely unfamiliar with
other humans (Shattuck 16). After being discovered in Aveyron, the boy was taken to the Saint–
Affrique orphanage where he stayed for a month. Initially, he did not like to wear clothing and hated
sleeping in a bed, but eventually got used to the bed and even seemed to enjoy when his sheets were
changed. He rejected most foods, and ate almost nothing besides potatoes (Shattuck 19). Experts
later postulated that the boy had lived for around five years in the wild. It is unknown what he had
lived like before this, but it is thought that until approximately six years of age, "He was probably
normal, though he may have been severely deprived or disturbed" (Shattuck 143–144). After the
orphanage, the so–called Wild Boy was cared for by a priest named Pierre–Joseph Bonnaterre and a
man named Clair (Shattuck 22, 24). After five months, the boy was taken to the Institute for Deaf–
Mutes in Paris. After those months of familiarity, the boy's transition to the institute did not go well,
and the employees could not handle him. Experienced doctors did not believe that the boy could be
helped, and only one doctor wanted to continue working with the boy. Jean–Marc Gaspard

Examples Of Innate Knowledge
Innate knowledge is knowledge or awareness of something from time of birth. Knowledge is a
cognizance, familiarity, understanding or skills that someone earn from experience or education. In
philosophy, some philosophers like Aristotle and Plato, argue that wisdom is inborn in the human
mind while the other said that knowledge is a compilation of experiences in life. But do we really
have innate knowledge?
Even though there has been a discussion for years that a new born child is more like a tabula rasa, (a
blank slate) It is somewhat conspicuous that some things are inborn and others are learnt through
experience. Many don't consider that innate knowledge exists. However, Instinct can count as
innate. In the theory of recollection by Plato, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Forever is a term used to describe something that last eternally or infinitely. Practically speaking,
some group of people really doesn't consider forever just because every material thing even places,
humans, animals will all eventually disappear. But what if I told you that forever exist despite of
everything being ephemeral? Forever exist. Not for all, but it does. Parmenides, the pre–Socratic
Greek philosopher contradicts Heraclitus's philosophy about impermanence. Yes, some things
changes into other things but sometimes they don't change and sometimes they change without
changing into something else. Forever exist. Not for all, but it does. Feelings can last forever. Not in
relationships but in God. His love for us is powerful and mighty. It'll never change. That thought is
enough to prove that forever does

Frankenstein Cruelty Analysis
Everyday, we hear stories of theft, abuse, and murder. Instantly, we judge the perpetrators. However,
why do some people commit these crimes? What causes them to take this path? Are they just
inherently bad, or are their actions influenced from external factors around them? Mary Shelley's
Frankenstein explores this interesting notion of tabula rasa–– the idea that babies are born with a
blank slate, suggesting that humans are not just pre–packaged with certain behaviours or prejudices.
Rather, it is learned. People are born pure and compelled to do evil at the feet of exclusion, isolation
or abuse, just like Frankenstein and/or the "monster". In this sense, acts of cruelty in Frankenstein
show that every one of us is capable of taking this heinous route of personal and projected
destruction with the absence of companionship. However, there are always intrinsic motivations or
characteristics revealed about the perpetrator/victim during these violent events. Thus, with further
inspection of both Frankenstein and his creation's acts of cruelty, the reader is exposed to their
insecurities, perspective on women, and dire vengefulness. Violent and cruel acts are usually done to
display power or dominance. Yet, in Frankenstein, they can be counterproductive and reveal
insecurities or buried fears instead. The earliest example of cruelty is when Frankenstein essentially
abandons his "child" right after creating it: "...I beheld the wretch ― the miserable monster whom I
had

Review Of ' Tabula Rasa '
Tabula rasa" this is how the educationalist John Locke, (1632) believed children were born, with a
"blank slate" beginning their lives morally neutral. He also wrote that "the little and almost
insensible impressions on our tender infancies have very important and lasting consequences. He
argued that the "associations of ideas" that one makes when young are more important than those
made later because they are the foundation of the self. Locke, (1632) also argued that because a
baby's mind was so malleable a parent could mould them with careful diligence. However Kohlberg
(2004) was one of the first theorists to address gender as a learned, cognitive concept. His thinking
was influenced by Piaget, who portrayed children as active learners who use interactions with their
environment to construct an understanding of the world around them (Piaget, 1961). Kohlberg
believed that children's cognitive understanding of gender influenced their behaviour (Kohlberg,
1981).
Walking into any new–born infant's room you could almost certainly guess the gender of the baby
just from the colour of his or her clothes, blankets, and toys. Any infant surrounded by pink items is
virtually certain to be a girl, whereas a child immersed in blue is very likely to be a boy. This colour
differentiation is not limited to newborns. Advertisements in catalogues and newspapers feature little
girls dressed in pink clothes, playing with pink toys, carrying pink lunchboxes, typing on pink
computers, and so

The Pros And Cons Of Nature Vs Nurture
Introduction In social psychology when nature or nurture is mentioned this always brings up
arguments and debates. It said to be dated back to Victorian era and it's a never ending battle
(Maribeth Mabanag).They argued that one of either nature or nurture was responsible for how
human turned out in life. This is something no scientists have been able to prove up to these modern
times. Nature is said to be things that you are acquired your from parents and you are born with such
as this like you eye colour, hair texture and your nose. It is said that whatever you are born with is
responsible for how you develop in life. When they speak of nurture, this deal with the effect of the
environment and how it helps develop a child's life. However, certain human traits remain a
biological mystery. These traits have been studied on the "outside" but whose "inside" origins
remain unclear. Such "mysterious" traits can be anything like intelligence, athletic ability, skin tone
and muscle mass. So all the assumptions and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It said to be dated back to Victorian era and it's a never ending battle (Maribeth Mabanag).They
argued that one of either nature or nurture was responsible for how human turned out in life. Up to
date the debate still continues on which is responsible for our development. Nativists is known for
their concept that the characteristics of the human species as whole are production of evolution and
everyone being different is due to a genetic code that is special. Things like the colour of your eyes,
straight or curly hair, pigmentation of the skin and certain diseases can be seen from when you were
born (McLeod, S. A. 2007). Some characteristics and difference cannot be observed when you born.
Due to maturation it is said that the body have an inner biological clock. For example when you
body develops as you go through puberty. (McLeod, S. A.

John Locke's Tabula Rasa
In John Locke's Tabula Rasa, he theorizes that every human is born as a blank slate, with society and
life experiences imprinting themselves to shape that person to who they are today. Society has a
social hierarchy that is instilled in every one of its followers, a pyramid with the ruler on top and the
obedient followers on the bottom. Pride may cause some to feel that they can climb the pyramid, to
reach the point where they are not in the shadows of their superiors and to bask in the light of power.
This is true even at the beginning of time with divine beings, such as Satan and God. Writer and
poet John Milton investigates this climb in his work and within himself as a person. John Milton
demonstrates his subservience towards God while ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Milton is also characterized in this epic, in his role as a humble servant in God's eyes and as a
haughty superior over other authors. There are many parallels in Milton's life and the epic, which
enforce the dichotomy of darkness in Satan and the light in God and the power of hierarchy in
mankind and in nature. Milton connects them together, signifying that one has the light and the
freedom that it brings when obeying the most superior, God. While Milton contains prideful
darkness in himself, but he humbly requests for God to shine His purifying light, signifying the
power that light has over darkness. While Adam may have fallen from Paradise, all hope is not lost.
Forgiveness caused Milton's inner light to shine in his work and Jesus to come down to save
mankind. When readers realize this, the story of Paradise Lost becomes more alive and important in
their lives. That is the dream of a great poet and

The Scientific Revolution And The Enlightenment
Kuda Masunungure Exam 2: Question 2 The Enlightenment was a period characterized by the idea
that people's use of reason could unlock the mysteries of the world around them. Thinkers of the
Enlightenment saw all aspects of the world–religion, wealth, and the earth itself–as being
understandable through natural laws. The reliance on and application of reason on the different
aspects of the world used by Enlightenment thinkers was directly informed by the Scientific
Revolution. In essence the presentation of and descriptive power of Enlightenment theories and
ideas would not have been possible without the strengthened exploratory and explanatory rigor
established in the Scientific Revolution. In terms of the PISCET categories discussed through the
lectures and the text, the most prevalent threads between the Scientific Revolution and the
Enlightenment is in their intellectual, economic, and political connections. During the Scientific
Revolution, the established ideas came from Aristotle. Aristotle's conception of the workings of the
universe–accepted to be a part of "Middle Ages cosmology" by professor Jones–set the empirical
and rational standard that all scientists set their sights upon. "If one's calculations did not fall inline
with the Aristotelian standard, it must not have been correct" (Buckowski lecture notes). The
revolutionary element came in the form of Ptolemy's modifications to Aristotle's standards to better
fit the phenomena he was observing. It is here

Importance Of Uniformities
Uniformities have become inevitable in our society and are visually seen everywhere from the way
people dress, in architecture, language, behavior, etc. The concept of knowledge has been developed
and evolved around the existence of uniformities. Uniformity is defined as the quality of lacking
diversity or variation for which quality is similar or comparable in kind or nature. Due to the
increasing amount of uniformities, knowledge has expanded to major aspects of the world and
uniformity has become a vital role in our development of knowledge. Uniformities are a major
aspect of our lives that contribute to our way of communicating amongst each other. However,
uniformities have introduced a world without individuality, creativity, and personify and evolving is
the base of humans to advancing which is problematic since we advance knowledge through
imagination and developing. Uniformities have altered our mindset to how we come to call
knowledge and our manner of viewing things as objects. Knowledge frameworks are based on
uniformities which are based on the principles of reason, as a principle, is universal. Language and
reason are the main crucial works of knowledge that manifest into various ways for accounting what
reason is, and the existence of many languages present among human beings. Both human science
and mathematics use language and reason as a way of collecting data in their observations and
develop the information into knowledge. In the other hand, these areas of

Nature And Nurture : Nature Nurture
RUNNING HEAD: NATURE NURTURE ON BEHAVIOUR
NATURE
This refers to all those characteristics and abilities that are determined by your genes. This is not the
same as the characteristics you are born with, because these may have been determined by prenatal
environment. In addition some genetic characteristic only appear later in development as a result of
the process of maturation. Supporters of nature have been called natavist.
NURTURE
This refers to the influence of experience, i.e, what is learned through interacting with both the
physical and social environment. Supporters of the nurture view are known as empiricists "holding
the view that all knowledge is gained through experience", you may be familiar with the term
empirical support; where data is collected through sensory experience rather than a reliance on
thoughts and ideas.
It has been noted that neither nature nor nurture can on their own provide complete explanation. All
characteristics are product of nature and nurture.
NATURE NURTURE CONTROVERSY
Atiri (2014) nature nurture controversy, retrieved from physiological psychology class note.
The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The debate centers on the
relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development.
Over the years, psychologists have been concerned with determining the relative amount contributed
by genetics or environmental factors to different behavior. They also often ask the

The Nature Vs. Nurture Debate
We all have parents that take care of us, giving what we need making sure that what life throws at us
than we know how to respond back and interact with society. Involvement in society at a later age is
dependent in which one is raised, so the parents have a big part in raising their kid making sure they
are having proper social interaction. Any amount of social interaction is going to have a positive
benefit, for young kids or any age. One of the most famous debates in Psychology is the Nature vs.
Nurture debate, which has been going on since the time of Aristotle. The aspect within this debate
comes to the question of; did the aspects of our behavior become because we inherited our
characteristics from our parents know as the Nature? The other question leads up to our behavior of;
did we get our characteristics from what we learned from the environment through experience? Both
of these arguments are neither right nor wrong and can work in many situations. People known as
empiricists look towards the human mind saying that at birth the mind is a tabula rasa, meaning a
blank slate and filled up with the result of experience and supporting the Nurture aspect. So when an
infant forms an attachment with the mother than he/she is responding from the love and attention,
which the mother is giving to the infant. This interaction goes along with the language and any other
thing the mother does towards the infant. The infant starts imitating the speech of others and the
cognitive

Nature Vs Nurture Essay
Nature vs. Nurture has been a big debate whether which one matters most when determining the
traits of an individual. So which has the greater effect on one's personality? Nature is thought of
what is being influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological factors while nurture is the
influence of external factors after conception. It is a debate that one is more important than the other
but both influences make a humans behavior.
Nature is to believe that at birth, you are born with your traits but they are not observable till later
during maturation. "Nativists take the position that all or most behaviors and characteristics are the
results of inheritance" (Cherry). For example, we inherit eye color, hair color, diseases, skin
pigmentation, height, and weight from our parents. Nurture is to believe that an individual is shaped
through influences of their environment and what they are exposed to. For example, if one is
abusive to their spouse and or children, it is possible that the one being abusive was abused when
they were younger. "Chomsky believed that language is learned through the use of an innate
language acquisition device that all humans are born with" (McLeod 2007). It is argued that nature
refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are such as our ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Albert Bandura did a behavioral experiment call the Bobo doll experiment, "Bandura demonstrated
that children could learn aggressive behaviors simply by observing another person acting
aggressively." (Cherry). Children develop a lot of skills by seeing and hearing others do things such
as talking and how they behave. Children often pick up and mimic the way they see and hear how
their parents act. Empiricists believe that at birth, "The human mind is a tabula rasa (a blank slate)
and that this is gradually "filled" as a result of experience" (e.g.

The Soul: The Beholder Of Soul And Knowledge
Knowledge is defined as the facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience
or education . It is the state of being aware of something. The soul, based on the Tripartite of the
Human Person by Plato, is referred to as the beholder of reason or knowledge, and the seat of
wisdom. It is the immaterial and immortal essence, which controls our body and spirit. What is the
relationship between our soul and knowledge? A philosopher named Plato stated that the Soul is the
beholder of perfection and knowledge. Soul came from the world of perfection. Perfection is
forgotten when the Soul merges with the Body. The perfection is then recalled through education. A
philosopher named Aristotle rejected this philosophy. He stated that there is no innate knowledge.
Our Soul can be compared to a Tabula Rasa or a blank slate. The Tabula Rasa acts as a room for
storing knowledge. The information gathered by our senses is processed by our brain, and is stored
in our soul How do we acquire knowledge? Locke ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This suggests that forever is not synonymous with infinite, because forever is something that is
continually and something that will exist for a very long time, while an infinite being is something
that has always existed, and will always exist. The phrase "Change is impossible!" by Parmenides is
impossible. If change is impossible, then humans and animals could have not existed. Humans and
animals are formed from two gametes that are combined together to form a zygote. As the zygote
develops, there is a change in the number of cells that it contains. If we were to remove the concept
of "change," then, zygotes would have remained as zygotes because mitosis would not take place.
Zygotes might also have not been formed because meiosis would not take

Examples Of Personality Development In Frankenstein
Personality Development: Nature Versus Nurture As Seen In Frankenstein Nature versus nurture, an
ongoing controversy in modern psychology, is a prominent theme in Frankenstein. For centuries,
psychologists and philosophers have been arguing about the basis of personality development and
social integration. Many psychologists adopt a biological or natural approach, believing that
personality development is a result of individual genetics. Alternatively, other psychologists believe
in an environmental approach, which states that an individual will learn how to act based on their
life circumstances, surroundings, and interactions. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley successfully
validates the nurture side of this debate through her explanation the monster's personality
development; although he was born with the natural desire to be gentle and kind, he eventually
became a vicious monster because of constant rejection, which can wreak havoc on people and turn
them into violent and even ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even nowadays, psychologists and researchers are studying this correlation. In fact, many recent
case studies indicate that school shootings were a result of rejection. Although this seems highly
unusual and extreme, in an examination of fifteen school shootings between 1995 and 2001, the
attackers in almost every case faced some kind of social rejection, with the exception of only two
out of the fifteen. In one particularly frightening school shooting in 1997 in West Paducah,
Kentucky, the shooter was clearly teased, rejected and bullied. After his arrest, he declared that "he
had grown tired of being teased and was quoted as saying, 'people respect me now.'" (Leary et al.).
Furthermore, constant rejection causes the victim to feel threatened, which gives them an urge to
retaliate with violence and aggression to regain power or feelings of control (Gerber and

Personal Statement On Personal Identity
Abstract
John Locke talks about personal identity. In additionally, he also speaks of the survival of conscious
after the demise of an individual. Locke also examines the criterion of personal identity though time.
The norm specifies insofar. Locke maintains that personal identity is a matter of psychological
continuity. Locker vividly considered personal self to be founded under consciousness, instead of
substance of the soul or the body.
Introduction
The matter of personal identity as well as its determents has become a matter of concern among
philosophers. Numerous questions have been raised as to what it does to be the person someone is
throughout the lifetime. For this reason, personal identity is a philosophical encounter with the
ultimate questions in regards to own existence. The questions include, who we are? Is there
existence after demise? Personal identity gives a set of sufficient conditions for personal identity
over time. As far as modern philosophy is concerned, the concept of personal identity is sometimes
called diachronic problem of personal character. The synchronic problems that are grounded in the
question of traits are used to characterize a certain problem over time. There are several theories that
describes identity problem. Throughout this paper, I will seek to discuss the views of John Locke
with respect to his theory of personal identity.
Essentially, Locke speaks of the existence of loosely connected questions that go hand in hand with

Essay about Child Development, Nature vs Nurture
.
The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The debate centers on the
relative contributions ofgenetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development. Some
philosophers such as Plato and Descartes suggested that certain things are inborn, or that they
simply occur naturally regardless of environmental influences. Other well–known thinkers such as
John Locke believed in what is known as tabula rasa, which suggests that the mind begins as a blank
slate. According to this notion, everything that we are and all of our knowledge is determined by our
experience.
For example, when a person achieves tremendous academic success, did they do so because they are
genetically predisposed to be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Babies begin to take in sensory experiences from the world around them from the moment of birth,
and the environment will continue to exert a powerful influence on behavior throughout life.
Geneticscan have a powerful influence on development, but experiences are equally important. For
example, while the genetic code contains the information on how a child's brain may be pre–wired,
it is learning and experience that will literally shape how that child's brain grows and develops.
Final ThoughtsClearly, genetics have an enormous influence on how a child develops. However, it is
important to remember that genetics are just one piece of the intricate puzzle that makes up a child's
life. Environmental variables, including parenting, culture, education and social relationships also
play a vital role.
Nature versus Nurture is a popular debate about whether our genetics, or environmental influences
"mold" more of who we are. An example is whether you get your out–going personality because of
your DNA, or because you grew up in an environment that made you out–going. Nature is your
genes, Nurture is environmental influences.Read more:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_argument_of_nature_vs_nurture#ixzz29QTunXP3
The nature vs nurture debate is one of the most enduring in the field of psychology.How far are
human behaviors, ideas, and feelings, INNATE and how far are they all LEARNED?These issues
are at the

The Civil Argument Of Epistemology
For decades, there has been an open deliberation over whether knowledge is intrinsic or if it springs
itself from life experiences: the civil argument of epistemology. Epistemology is the investigation of
knowledge and its techniques and legitimacy. Individuals from philosophers to scientists to
psychologists have argued their perspectives, yet even today the contention is not yet settled.
Personally, I believe that it bodes well for knowledge to originate from experiences. Three
philosophers that are solid proponents for the belief that knowledge is derived from experiences are
Gaston Bachelard, Immanuel Kant, and John Locke. One of the great epistemologists was Gaston
Bachelard who was more commonly known as a "philosopher of science." ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Kant concurred with empiricists that "concepts without perceptions are empty" (lonestar). He
acknowledged that concepts and ideas cannot constitute knowledge alone and that innate ideas do
not constitute knowledge at all. This brought about his conviction that there must be experience(s) in
life for there to be knowledge. His theory was that there are two sorts of reasoning to acquire
knowledge: posteriori reasoning and priori reasoning. The posteriori reasoning depends upon
experience in the world that provides us with information. For example, if I said that "Barack
Obama was the president of the United States in 2010," I would only know that this is true through
experience; I would not be able to determine this through an analysis of the concepts of "president"
or "Barack Obama." In contrast, a priori reasoning does not rely on experience to inform it, but to
create the knowledge. Kant believed that with priori reasoning, the dynamic mind relates and
understands experiences in terms of causes and effects where an event takes place and causes an
experience to happen with the effect of knowledge being gained. Kant's crucial insight here is to
argue that experience of a world as we have it is only conceivable if the psyche provides an efficient
organizing of its representations; the mind makes deductions prior to experiences, but can only truly
experience something in the event that it obtains knowledge from the

Poverty Influences Children 's Early Brain Development
Poverty Influences Children's Early Brain Development
Children have been the topic of many research studies and debates throughout history. Scientists,
educators, social workers and teachers have debated the importance of nature and nurture in children
's development. Our ideas of children are shaped greatly by the portrayal of children through media.
Producers, journalists, and writers have the power to either portray children as passive or active
agents in their development of social, academic and life skills. The authors' assumptions and
personal beliefs of children or childhood can be identified through the way they represent children
in their writings. In the article, "Poverty Influences Children's Early Brain Development" the author
reports the effect that poverty has on the development of infants and young children's brain size.
Developing children are portrayed as passive, relying on the guidance of parents, caretakers and the
community, rather than being seen as active agents who can utilize an innate ability to learn, and
overcome any obstacles, including poverty. The author focuses on the idea that children, while
developing, are dependent on stimulation from others: parents, relatives, caregivers and the
environment to learn socio–emotional skills that impact their ability to learn in the future. The
author's perspective of children as passive beings can be inferred from his selection of quotes
included in his article. For example, in the news

Essay about History of Nature and Nurture
Abstract Nature vs. nurture has been discussed by philosophers in the past and by scientists most
recently. Philosophers such as Plato argued that all knowledge was inherited through your parent
and when you were told something you didn't learn it you were just reminded of it. Aristotle
however argued that all humans were born with a blank slate and built on it with influence from
there environment. In the 1700's the empiricists and the internalists took over the argument. They
fought through letters explaining there point of views and denouncing the others. This leads to
Pavlov coming up with the idea of behaviorism in the early 1900‘s. Behaviorism became the new
wave of Psychology and influenced a lean towards the nurture side. It was ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Two philosophers, G.W. Leibniz and John Locke, were main representatives of their respected
explanations. Leibniz promoted the internalism point of view. Cowie states, "...Leibniz's position on
this issue is, of course, that the tabula is far from rasa: ‘The soul inherently contains the sources of
various notions and doctrines, which external objects merely rouse up...' " (Cowie, 1999, p. 7).
Leibniz argued against Locke and other empiricists stated that "...there is no way ideas which come
into the mind from outside can be formed into beliefs and judgments without the operation of
specific internal mechanisms" (Cowie, 1999, p. 17). At the same time, John Locke and his fellow
philosophers campaigned for empiricism. Like Aristotle, the philosophers believed that humans'
thoughts and actions were determined not by innate factors, but by the their unique experiences
(Ashcraft, 1998). Locke argued against the internalists by examining different human processes such
as logic and reasoning. He would ask how it was possible to use logic and reasoning if people were
born with all of the knowledge they would ever acquire (Cowie 1999, p. 19). The contrasting views
of the two groups had begun the nature vs. nurture debate, which would linger in the fields of
philosophy and psychology for decades. A point should be made that even though the interalists and
empiricists felt strongly about their theories, the

Psychology : Nature Vs. Nurture In Psychology
Jordan De Herrera
Dr. Wasserstein
EN 300
25 October 2017
Nature Versus Nurture The major that I have declared here at Washburn University is Psychology.
Psychology is the scientific study of the human mind and behavior. For years' psychologist have
researched and studied what factors influence development and behavior. One of the oldest and most
talked about debates in the history of Psychology is the Nature versus Nurture argument. This
debate goes back as far as the early Greeks but the phrase was first coined in 1871 by Sir Francis
Galton. (Lewis) The controversial debate focuses on whether behavior, culture, and personality are
mainly influenced by nature or nurture. According to Kendra Cherry, "Nature refers to all of the
genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are–from our physical appearance to our
personality characteristics. Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are,
including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our
surrounding culture" (Cherry).
There are two possible positions that can be taken within this debate. The first position is that nature
(genetics) primarily influences human development and behavior. Some of these biologically
determined characteristics that can be inherited include, "Height, weight, hair loss (in men), life
expectancy and vulnerability to specific illnesses (e.g. breast cancer in women) are positively
correlated between genetically related

Examples Of Knowledge Is Innate
Knowledge is innate. That according to Plato our knowledge is inborn and I agree on that. Tulad
nalang ng isang bagong panganak na sanggol. Why do they have the knowledge to cry in the first
place and why do they know how to drink milk. That thing is already knowledge. Everything we do
is knowledge because we do that particular thing because we have that knowledge to do it. For an
example, some people ask "kailan ka natuto kumanta?" and they will answer us "inborn na to!" dahil
lahi pala talaga nila ang magagaling kumanta. This knowledge must come from before birth. I
honestly agree with Plato, because there are things that it is inborn or innate that everyone has in it,
iba–iba man pero that thing made us all unique. But suddenly Aristotle contradicts it he said that
"There is no innate knowledge" It's like that our human mind is a tabula rasa a blank slate which
experience imprints knowledge. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because we learn that every challenge that come into our lives, there is a particular solution for it,
and our life is like a mathematical equation we need to do the trial and error process to find the
perfect match and to make the equation right. But, according to our handouts, in St. Thomas
Aquinas theory of knowledge "he is firm on the fact that there are no innate ideas, but that all
knowledge must proceed first from the senses. The sense data gathered by our external and internal
senses from a sense or image is known as the phantasm. And it goes through the active intellect
which concerned with

Philosophy Paper On John Locke
Christian Hubbard
Dr. Burgess
Philosophy 101
September 27, 2017
Philosophy Paper 1
John Locke believes our ideas originate from intuitive knowledge based on our own experiences.
Locke states, "We know that we exist on immediate reflection because of the nature of
consciousness, not because of any poor knowledge hidden within us" (pg. 201). In this quote, Locke
explains how his ideas originate. He believes that our knowledge is based on experience of what we
learn in nature rather than in a pre–existing hidden knowledge. This belief is what is usually called
the "white paper or tabula rasa theory" (pg. 201).
The white paper, according to Locke, is the "tabula rasa, a blank slate that has no characteristics
until someone experiences ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some examples of secondary qualities are taste, color, and smell. In all these examples, perceptions
fuel our mind with what we see and how we see it. An apple can look very shiny and can have the
appearance of being red, but those are only perceptions of our mind.
It is possible to obtain certain knowledge from matters of fact because both sides of an argument in
matters of fact can be conceivable. Therefore, one would have both sides or opinions to an idea
which would lead people to obtain certainty.
Hume's fork of knowledge represents a metaphorical fork of two beliefs that seem to contrast
amongst each other. The specific beliefs in the fork of knowledge are relations of ideas and matters
of fact. The first side is called relations of ideas. Relations of ideas are propositions known with
perfect certainty that can be demonstrated using the mind alone. Thus, they do not rely on the
existence of anything (beyond the mind). If one would deny a specific relation of idea statement, the
sentence would end up sounding in an absurd and nonsense fashion. For example, if someone stated
the fact; all triangles have three sides, its opposite would be, not all triangles have three sides. This
statement is nonsense because a shape or figure that has three sides to it is and always will be a
called a triangle. Thus, relations of ideas must be true statements. These carry the "weight of
necessity" because they are essentially necessary

Childhood Is A Complex And Interesting Idea
Childhood is a complex and interesting idea to define. It can be viewed in a technical manner,
considering that childhood finishes at a certain age. Alternatively, childhood could be considered in
relation to experiences, expectations and societal views. There are many influences to consider when
defining childhood and what determines a person's idea about childhood. In this discussion paper I
will be exploring some key ideas of childhood and thinking about this in the context of child
development.
Childhood could be viewed as socially constructed, it is difficult to define as every child is diverse
and has different influences, such as time, space and countries.
What is a child?
There are many ways of defining what a child is and all individuals have a different perspective.
Oxford dictionaries define a child as "a young human being below the age of puberty or below the
legal age of majority"
Oxford Dictionaries (2014). This statement does not define a child, as all children experience
puberty at different ages. For example, a child may have reached puberty by 13 years old, but by
law, they are still a child, as they are not able to vote, drive, drink alcohol or have sexual intercourse.
However, some holiday companies define adults as 12 years and over, therefore they are classed as
an adult within this organisation, despite being under age to take part in numerous activities.
What is childhood?
Oxford dictionaries define childhood as "the state or period of being a

John Locke Vs Rousseau
"The truth is, one who seeks to achieve freedom by petitioning those in power to give it to him has
already failed, regardless of the response. To beg for the blessing of "authority" is to accept that the
choice is the master's alone to make, which means that the person is already, by definition, a slave."
(Larken Rose) The Enlightenment brought change to the world we live in during the 18th century.
We were gifted with many thinkers, philosophers, and new ideas about how we learn in our society.
Two philosophers we receive are John Locke, and Jean–Jacques–Rousseau. Both of these men were
advocates for natural law in some form, and believed in freedom and equality. In this essay, I will go
over both Locke and Rousseau individually and go ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of his arguments for why education at the time was flawed was because it was man–made. He
believed that the educational system should interfere as little as it can during the child's natural
development because the system would corrupt their development. His view of education was that it
should emphasize the development of children, that it should be focused on the student rather than
the material that is being taught. He saw the education system as a problem since it was tailored to
teach specifics and can hinder their intellectual development. "Suit man's education to man, and not
to what is not man. Do you not see that, in working to fashion him solely for one state, you render
him useless for any other?" (Rousseau, 2016) He claims that natural development can teach a broad
view of the world and therefore can be seen as a better form of education. To Rousseau, an ideal
way of ensuring the proper education of a child, they should be placed in direct contact with nature
without the influence of others' opinions. Another key idea of Rousseau's philosophy was his view
on women's education. He was credited with having a view of equality, however, he did not see
women as equals of men. He thought women were less rational and weaker than men and they
depend on men. He states in another one of his famous works, Emile, that a woman's main

Theme Of Romanticism In My Antonia
When Jim Burden initially reaches Nebraska, his descriptions of nature help the reader understand
not only his personal experiences, but also the Romanticism prevalent in the book, My Antonia. This
sets the reader up for the struggle and conflict between Modernism and Romanticism in the book,
which is a major theme that Willa Cather utilizes in her novel. However, there is more to this
Romantic description that meets the eye. On pages 12 and 13, Jim describes looking at the land
while he travels to his grandparents, a passage which evokes beauty and hints towards philosophical
meaning. Through this passage in the first chapter, it becomes clear that Jim's narration of the nature
around him works to highlight the idea that the land is a heaven that is untouched. Like young Jim,
the land is in a "blank slate," which intertwines the land and Jim together. This is furthered through
the progression of the land and Jim, as they progress into godlike beings. Through this progression
and balance, the balance between Modernism and Romanticism is achieved, and the reader better
understands the intentions of Cather, thus leading to a better understanding of the text as a whole.
Jim's view of the land, and his word choice in describing the land, proves that Nebraska is a symbol
for heaven. This heavenly state is important, as it shows that the land is important and highly placed.
Jim explicitly states that, unlike his hometown, Nebraska was not entirely earthly in presence. He
says,

Critical Pedagogy And The Reggio Emilia
Critical pedagogy and The Reggio Emilia approach on play based learning should be merged into
early childhood education as obtaining the skills to critically analyze and problem solve has the
potential to change society and thus the potential to change the world.
It is important individuals become aware of what critical pedagogy is. Critical pedagogy stems from
the idea that there is an unequal social structure in our society which is based upon class, race and
gender. It has been formulated and influenced by many psychologists and philosophers including
John Dewey and Paulo Freire. Critical pedagogy is an attempt at freedom from oppression through
democratic critical thinking. In critical pedagogy the knowledge learned within the classroom
should correlate with and not be separated from any social structure, culture, politics, economics or
any ideology taking place with society. The idea is, that in order to orchestrate change, individuals
must become aware of the social, cultural, ideological, and or economic influence exerted upon
society. Once the individual becomes aware of the hegemony taking place they can then analyze
their situation and implement change for the greater good.
John Dewey born October 20th, 1859 was an American psychologist and philosopher. He was
known well for his avocation in democracy and his theories on progressive education which
correlate and transition into critical pedagogy. His theories focused on the argument that learning
and education are

Nurture Plays a More Dominant Role in Human's Development...
Humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this
process that leads people to question, is a child's development influenced by genetics or their
environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now
and is better known as "Nature versus Nurture". The continuous controversy on whether or not
children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they
have been raised (nurture) has pondered the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough
experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to see that nurture is far more important in
the development of a human than nature.
The Nature versus Nurture argument can be traced back many millenniums ago. In 350 B.C.,
philosophers asked the same question on human behaviour. Plato and Aristotle were two
philosophers that each had two diverse views on the matter. Plato believed that knowledge and
behaviour were due to inherent factors, but environmental factors still played a role in the equation.
Conversely, Aristotle had different views. He believed in the idea of "Tabula Rasa".
The Blank Slate theory supported the nurture side of the argument and believed that everyone was
born with a 'Tabula Rasa', Latin for 'Blank Slate'. He proposed that "people learn and acquire ideas
from external forces or the environment". In other words, he believed that the mind is a blank slate
and it is our

Is Tommy's Childhood Affected By Nature Or Nurture?
Tommy has always been an aggressive child at school and at home. He bullies all of his peers and
belittles the younger kids at his elementary school. Some scientist argue that Tommy is the way he is
because of the genetics he inherited from his parents, trying to prove that nature makes up his
identity. Other scientist argue that he is aggressive because he was raised in an abusive home with
parents that discredit him in everything he does, showing that nurture makes up his personality.
Nature and nurture both determines one's personality, but the nurture side has a stronger impact
through parents, friends, and culture. Nurture from a child's parent has the strongest and longest
lasting effect on a child. A parent's love and presence in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The culture a child is raised in makes up how one thinks and the actions they take after. Society and
the culture impress on all ages the idea of "perfect" and some may not be conscious of it, but we are
all trying to achieve that idea. After a young adult leaves their home, the only nurturing they receive
is from the culture around them. In cultures with agriculture as their main food source the kids learn
lot more life skills. For example they learn responsibility, compliance, nurturance and less self–
reliance (Albert). The way a culture teaches and shows kids the way they should be is how they will
turn out. Having a constant idea of how one should turn out according to the culture puts a mold on
how a child forms and will fit into the mold. Culture tells a kid how they should act, look like, and
even feel and expects them to listen. Social media presents culture to kids even when they are alone,
and impresses even further how they should act. Tommy exemplifies that nurture has a longer
impact on a child as they grow up. As he grew up and left his home he started to surround himself
with supportive friends and lost contact with his parents. After a few years he reconnected with his
one of his old friends from elementary school, and she noticed a change in Tommy's personality.
Tommy shows that genetics do not make a person who they are, but rather their parents, friends, and

Nature vs. Nurture Essay
Abstract
Nature vs. nurture has been discussed by philosophers in the past and by scientists more recently.
Philosophers such as Plato argued that all knowledge was inherited from your parents and when you
were told something you didn't learn it you were just reminded of it. Aristotle however argued that
all humans were born with a blank slate and built on it with influence from there environment. In the
1700's the empiricists and the internalists took over the argument. They fought through letters
explaining there point of views and denouncing the others. This leads to Pavlov coming up with the
idea of behaviorism in the early 1900's. Behaviorism became the new wave of Psychology and
influenced a lean towards the nurture side. It was not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
3). Plato theorized, and Descartes later agreed, that all knowledge is present at birth. Plato also
believed that the environment played a part in human processes, but he thought it had an unique
role. He believed the environment did not teach people anything new, but its purpose was to remind
people of information they already knew (Cowie, 1999). Although
Plato's views are not supported today, he laid the groundwork for other researchers to follow.
On the other hand, philosopher Aristotle theorized a different idea about human behavior. He
presented the idea that humans are born into the world with a
"blank slate" and people's behavior and thoughts are due to experience
(Ashcraft, 1998). His tabula rasa explanation believed that the environment and experience were the
important influences in human behavior. Unlike Plato,
Aristotle hypothesized that humans were not born with knowledge, but they acquire it through
experience (Ashcraft, 1998). Aristotle's idea of the tabula rasa is not believed today. Nevertheless,
his belief that the environment was a vital factor in behavior influenced many empiricists throughout
history.
During the late 1700s, the nature vs. nurture debate began to heat up between philosophers.
Internalists

Influence Of Influence On The Upbringing And Rearing Of...
The word says, "Train up a child in the way they should go, and when he is old he will not depart
from it."
– Proverbs 22:6 New King James Version (NKJV)
In America today the rise of violence that is being committed by children is growing daily. The
pressure that is placed upon a parent to raise children in a certain demeanor has fallen to the waste
side, and every man, woman, and child is for themselves. Outside influences play a major role in the
upbringing and rearing of children no matter what age and time they were brought up in.
"Men, in a word, must necessarily be controlled either by a power within them or by a power
without them; either by the Word of God or by the strong arm of man; either by the Bible or by the
bayonet."
–Robert Winthrop, Speaker of the U. S. House
According to Webster's Dictionary, influence is defined as the capacity to have an effect on the
character, development, or behavior of someone or something, or the effect itself. Meaning you
become what you see the most and you develop the language of what you hear the most. There are
many influences that impact the way children perceive life and themselves, from TV, imitation of
others (peer pressure), drugs, anger, mental disorders, and lack of parental guidance, just to name a
few. Children today are looking to themselves and other things outside of the home to guide them or
encourage them to be who they feel they are. With the growth of technology and its major impact on
the American family,

Tabula Rasa In Victor Frankenstein
Brought to life from the dead by the workings of Victor Frankenstein; There he was, a tabula rasa.
Tabula rasa is the absence of preconceived ideas or predetermined goals or a clean slate as stated in
the dictionary. Unbroken by society the creature was not a monster. It was the responsibility of
Frankenstein to influence and guide the creation to greatness and productivity but as the creator
abandoned him, he was all alone on the search of knowledge. As the creature yearned to be
enlightened, he discovered a series of books and those of his "protectors" which led him to the path
of destruction and revenge. One of the first books that the creature learned from was Volney's
"Ruins of Empires." The creature learns about the "science of letter" from this book and it "opened a
wide field for wonder and delight." It was full of information regarding historic empires and their
way of life including certain manners, the way the governments were ran, and the religions of each.
Asia, Greece, Roman wars, and the discovery of western hemisphere were also of topics explained
in the book by Felix. The creature stated, "Was man, indeed, at once so powerful, so virtuous and
magnificent, yet so vicious and base?"(Page 50) Through all this, he gained knowledge on the way
the world worked and was ran. This also sparked the hatred for ever being created and gave him the
ways of destruction and means of power. The next book which added to the sum of all who the
creature was Goethe's "Sorrows

Locke And Leibniz's Essay
In 1697 famed German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz attempted to correspond with the English
philosopher John Locke about Locke's book An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Fancher
& Rutherford, 2012, p. 51). Locke, who found the contents of Leibniz's letter misaligned with the
man's esteemed reputation, coolly rebuffed the attempt. Leibniz was not discouraged by Locke's
rejection, however, and went on to expand his ideas in New Essays on Human Understanding
(Fancher & Rutherford, 2012, p. 52). Locke died just before the manuscript was completed and
Leibniz neglected to publish it out of respect to the deceased philosopher who would thus be
incapable of responding. Though these two philosophers were never given the opportunity to
correspond on their ideas concerning their theoretical differences, they had much in common. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Descartes proposed many thoughts upon which modern philosophical ideas were built, resulting in
him being dubbed the father of modern Western philosophy. Locke and Leibniz were both heavily
influenced by the Frenchman's beliefs, but they had embraced and rejected completely different
aspects of his theories. Locke had concurred with Descartes thoughts on physics and physiology, but
he objected to Descartes' proposal of a "constantly active conscious soul" (Fancher & Rutherford,
2012, p. 52). Leibniz abhorred many of Descartes' theories on physics, especially Descartes' simple
natures, but he could not dispute "the unquestionable reality of the conscious soul" (Fancher &
Rutherford, 2012, p. 53). Locke led the charge of the empiricist rejection of Descartes, while
Leibniz advocated philosophies of the mind in concurrence with Descartes' nativist and rationalist

Review Of ' Lord Of The Flies '
Tabula Rasa over Centuries
People say that a person cannot live a positive life with a negative mind. That person has the ability
to take action through influence and experience. Lord of the Flies by William Golding gives a
graphic example about loss of complete culture to bestial ambience. This may be recognizable with
the boys' perception on fun and games. Leisure for the children on the island goes from playing Tic
Tac Toe in the sand to hunting for pigs and eventually one another. In parallel to the story, this
hazardous recreation takes place in our own reality. For children of the 21st century, it manifests as
video games. Lord of the Flies amplifies influence, and its effect on adolescent behavior mirroring
today 's societal interest in the violent virtual world.
A supporting idea containing morality connects to the Tabula Rasa theory. John Locke, an
Enlightened English philosopher, embraced the importance of experience over speculation. He
emphasizes the human mind at birth is a complete, but receptive, blank slate. This ideally proves
how experience affects knowledge. "Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper void
of all characters, without any ideas. [...] Whence has it all the materials of reason and knowledge?
To this I answer, in one word, from experience." (John Locke, Essay). In relation to this famous
idea, the boys' lives in Lord of the Flies reinforces the idea immensely. Through Jack's idea of fun
and games, benevolence is subconsciously

Reflection Paper On Rmsel Family
Greetings fellow RMSEL civilians, I am Dinara for those who didn't know me. And today, I would
like to talk about our little RMSEL community. Our RMSEL community is wonderful, it is full of
compassion, comfort, social acceptance, you name it. I have always dreamed of a little world with
all of these components, and here I am today in that little world; my dream has come true. But, there
is always going to be a problem in this little world that we all live in, and that problem is that we can
get sad pretty easily. That sadness can get carried off to others all around us, it becomes contagious
and dreadful, we can get all these different kinds of emotions just from this sadness. And sometimes
our little community falls apart just because of that vile, cancerous sadness. As RMSEL citizens, we
have to get rid of this sadness, we have to overcome this sadness before it is too late. When I first
came to RMSEL in 6th grade, I felt uncomfortable with my surrounding others. I didn't recognize
anyone's faces and I didn't feel welcomed. But, I didn't give up, I came to this school because I
wanted to achieve in becoming a better person. So I tried to make myself comfortable with the
school's system, I asked questions to the students on how the system is like for this school. They
gave me answers, and I became more and more aware of the school. The students told me
everything, but usually in a traditional school, the explanation on the school's system would be
written on

Maxine Greene's 'Shapes Of Childhood Recalled'
In "Shapes of Childhood Recalled" by Maxine Greene the author explores how children and humans
alike absorb and construe the world around them, from shapes and outlines to forming an
understanding and fitting this information in their schema. Greene takes the reader on a journey in
this passage from children not having any prior knowledge about their surrounding environment to
being able to retrieve learned material. Many philosophers have used the term "tabula rasa" to
describe how not only children learn from experiences and are initially born as a "blank slate" but
also as adults continue to learn from what they encounter in life. This term was first introduced by
John Locke in the 17th century but can be traced back to the writings of Aristotle ... Show more
Merriam–Webster defines the noun "horizon" as: the limit or range of a person's knowledge,
understanding, or experience, but horizon can also be interpreted as a change or goals that one might
have. When deciphering the meaning of this sentence in terms of the capabilities of a person "we
strain toward horizon" meaning how much conscious effort is put towards one's education and
towards enjoying life. Living in the United States one is legally obligated to attend school but how
well and how much effort is put into schooling is the student's decision, even though they are
usually pressured by family members and teachers alike to try their best because what they do now
can impact their future. "Horizons of what was" this line from the passage can be interpreted as
looking at the past of what happened in education, the policies and ways of teaching that were put in
place. These are still constantly changing and molding to the students and educators making sure to
benefit everyone that is involved while also maintaining a

Night By Elie Wiesel Tabula Rasa Quotes
Tabula Rasa is the epistemological belief that people are born as a clean–slate. Therefore, all
knowledge one has, is acquired. This includes the decision of right or wrong. If one is raised
correctly and decides to make the right choices in life, they should have privileges. It is possible for
human rights to be actualized for every person willing to live by them. First, criminals or people
who hurt others on purpose shouldn't expect to receive human rights. In the novel, Night by Elie
Wiesel, the author retells stories of when he was a victim of the holocaust. In this book, he tells a
story of a Jewish woman screaming that she saw a fire whilst on a train to the concentration camps.
The other passengers were getting annoyed, so they tried to stop the woman. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Look at the flames! Flames everywhere....' Once again, the young men bound and gagged her. When
they actually struck her, people shouted their approval...she received several blows to the head,
blows that could have been lethal" (Wiesel 26). This passage recalls the account of how a group of
men harmed a woman of their own community. These men shouldn't expect to receive human rights
after they harmed a poor woman that they thought was mentally ill. They took away her rights,
therefore the possibility of rights for them is out of the picture. In addition, to Elie's book, he also
gave a speech, Perils of Indifference, to express his views of indifference and how it affects our
society. He mentions, "These failures have cast a dark shadow over humanity: two world wars,
countless civil wars, the senseless chain of assassinations...blood baths in Cambodia and Algeria,
India and Pakistan, Ireland and Rwanda, Eritrea and Ethiopia, Sarajevo and Kosovo..."

Nature Vs Nurture Research Paper
'Nature v. Nurture' is the psychological term that questions whether genetic factors or environmental
factors affect human psychological development more. This short essay will cover three main topics.
What does 'nature vs. nurture' mean? The discussion of 'nature vs. nurture' classifications. Also, the
controversy of 'nature vs. nurture'. How much does your DNA control about you? This is what the
nature vs. nurture debate challenges.
What Does 'Nature vs. Nurture' Mean?
Nature refers to the genetic factors that affect our development and influence who we are. It is easy
to observe that the coding of our DNA shapes our physical features, as mentioned above. More
abstract features like intelligence, personality, sexual orientation, and behaviour ... Show more
They favour the nature side. Nativists believe that people's behaviour is the result of many years of
evolution and adaptation and that our individual differences stem from the genetics we inherit from
our parents. An example of this nativist theory was theorized by Noam Chomsky. He proposed that
all children are born with an instinct mental capacity to both produce and learn language. If people
are able to inherit the ability to learn language, does this mean that other behavioural traits and
abilities are also inherited? Those in favour of explaining human behaviour by way of nurture are
called empiricists. These empiricists believe that the mind begins as a blank slate, which is also
known as tabula rasa. This notion then explains that our experiences and memories shape who we
are, how we behave, and what our knowledge is by filling the blank slate during our years of life.
Albert Bandura's social learning theory is an example within the empiricist side of psychology. This
theory suggested that people learn by observing the behaviour of others. In his Bobo doll
experiment, it was observed that children could learn aggressive behaviour by watching adults act
aggressively. Was this imitated aggressive behaviour the result of the environment children were put
into, or did they have a genetic predisposition for violence and

What Does Locke Mean By Returning
Jesus Gutierrez
Benjamin Dunn
Phil–1301–P08
03–13–2017
Midterm Essay What does Locke mean by returning to "Commonsense," and what does he see in
impressions? What does Hume think about impressions? And how do both Locke and Hume
correlate with one and another? In locke's writing he argues over common sense and of impressions
while also focusing on countering Descartes' Writing. While Hume goes more in depth about
impressions and ideas and how they relate to one and another, while also explaining about how they
both function. Readers will know Locke 's thoughts towards innate ideas, Hume 's view towards
cause and effect, and on how both Locke and Hume are relatable to one and another In Locke's
essay of, "concerning ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hume says that for humans finding or thinking of no explanation for the cause and effect could be
considered as such unintelligible. Hume explains that we get the knowledge of cause and effect
through our experiences. Hume explains more in depth by describing if how something new is
introduced to someone they would not have the experience to cover any of the causes and effects of
that object because they have no past experience towards that one object. Hume also says that
someone is not able to find the effect from just experiencing the cause and as Hume assumes only if
you have experienced it all will you know what will happen if the same thing is going to happen
you'll assume or predict what will be the cause and effect. Such as for every day you experience the
sun comes up every day you'll expect it or predict that it will probably come back up tomorrow as
it's been a repeating experience. Hume presumes that people imagine, to discover the causes and
effects through reasonings and not experience.which in turn is not what he believes is true. But
Hume explains that we would never be able to find the cause of what gunpowder would do with fire
through reasoning alone and also could not find the cause or effects of any particular event. Both
Hume and Locke agree that the brain starts as a "blank state" going against what Descartes thought.
While Descartes wrote that everything was already in the mind and it just needed to be "unlocked"
through doing

A Critique On The Blank Slate, The Noble Savage And The...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Barb Tillich

More from Barb Tillich (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

A Critique On The Blank Slate, The Noble Savage And The...