Early Blood Transfusion

Early Blood Transfusion
Early blood transfusion experiments frequently involved animals. In 1665, French scientist Richard Lower. He started to explore blood
transfusion, he tried transfusing blood between animals, and the experiment was a success; so he started experimenting transfusing blood
between ANIMAL and HUMAN!("Big Picture") However, their blood are not compatible and the recipients survived only if they received a very
small amount of blood. The Royal Society and the French government banned the experiment in 1668. The blood transfusion is still unpredictable.
People started to realize some blood cells are compatible, some are not. If the recipient gets blood that's not compatible with theirs, it can cause a
transfusion reaction, which can cause serious symptoms or even death." 1900, Karl Landsteiner discovered SOME healthy person's blood serum
can agglomerate other's red blood cells, so he start to experimenting with the blood cells. In 1901, he tried to combine different people's blood
serum and red blood cells together, and he discovered three groups (A,B,C; the C changed to O later). ("Big Picture") Karl's student found out the
fourth blood group, after few years they discovered other blood systems, for example MNS blood system, RH blood system. ("Big Picture") They
discovered why some recipients can survive and some can't. When two... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This discovery had once helped in forensic science and paternity test. It can help to identify blood from an object or on a dead body, which can
help and provide clues and evidences to the detective; for example, where blood is from, they could use it to tract the murder. In paternity test it
helps people to find their relative or parents/kids by identifying your blood, to see if their blood is compatible, but because of it's accuracy, it had been
replaced by gene identification. Now, 33 blood group system was discovered, in 33 groups 600+ blood group antigens was
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Animal Research Persuasive Essay
Medicines or cures save many people. They can make headaches go away or injury pains vanish. But how do people know if it will work or if it
will make it worse? Animals. They test out the cures on animals before they announce that they have a pain killer or medicine for some diseases or
problems. These animals are suffering from these tests and sometimes they might not even work. There lives are being sacrificed to save ours, is it
fair? Although these creatures may be helping us, these animals are suffering, they don't have many of the diseases people have, millions of animals are
being tested, and sometimes, they go to waste.
About 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals worldwide undergo experimentation each year" (Driscoll "et ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People say they are not like us and that they shouldn't be treated fairly. That is like saying that this guy has darker skin so he shouldn't be treated
like me, like in the 60's. Also, testing animals is almost like giving a person a suit that they have created and testing out if the suit will withstand
the bullet. What is the suit doesn't work? Dead. His family has lost a member and are probably very upset and angry. How do you think the
animals' families feel when their child is taken and is never returned? It is unjust to just break a family apart and never repair the crack. Most of
the time, these tests don't zhelp. More than likely, it doesn't work in the animals and they die. Even if it does work, they are killed anyway. And if
it does work in the animals, it doens't always work for humans. "Animals do not get many of the diseases we do, such as Parkinson's disease, major
types of heart disease, many types of cancer, Alzheimer's disease, HIV or schizophrenia." Although their creation is tested and works in animals, it
doesn't always help humans and could make it worse. How would you feel if you were ripped out of your family, tortured, then killed no matter what
happened and never saw them ever

Persuasive Essay On Animal Abuse
Imagine being thrown in cage, beaten, starved or forced to do something for no reason... other than someone else's entertainment. We have all seen
those ASPCA commercials showing depressing pictures of beaten and starved animals asking for help, yet animal cruelty/abuse is still a major
problem. Even though on average, 1,920 animal cruelty cases are reported in the media each year, thousands of cases are unreported or unnoticed
by the public (Animal Cruelty Facts and Stats). Regardless of animal cruelty being a felony which can result in jail time and thousands of dollars
in fines, it is still something which occurs on a daily basis across the United States and it needs to be addressed in affective ways. To understand
the issue, we must define key terms related to animal cruelty. Animal cruelty is defined " legally... as any act of violence or neglect that inflicts
suffering or death on an animal" and it consists of two parts: passive and active (Animal Cruelty). Passive cruelty is when animals are neglected by
their owners, usually unknowingly or unwillingly. For example, when a person hoards dozens of animals at a time and doesn't have the means to
care for every single one of them, the animals are withheld the necessary care like food, water, shelter, veterinary care, etc. Active cruelty, on the
other hand, is when an animal is abused with the intention of inflicting injury or death. This is seen in bloodsport, like dogfighting, in torture,
beating, mutilation, poisoning, or shooting or when the animal is kept in a confined cage (Animal Cruelty). Active cruelty is also seen in puppy
mills or in situations that turn a profit, like trafficking or animal breeding. The USDA provides many guidelines regarding the care standards of the
animals in the breeding mills, however most of them have up to a thousand breeding animals so their care comes second to the profit they make off
of the offsprings. As early as five BC, Greek scientists have cut open live animals to study their inner workings and used them to test whether or not
drugs were safe to administer to humans. In 1876, England passed the Cruelty to Animals Act, which gave researchers certain guidelines to abide to in
order to get a license to test on

Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned
Consumers buy products most commonly from brands that they feel provide the best quality. They are also counting on the products to be safe. For
example beauty products should not be harmful to the area it is being applied on, and hair dyes should not cause other reactions other than coloring
the consumer 's hair. For companies, these are big concerns on their hands to avoid bad reputation, lawsuits, etc. There are many ways these products
can be cleared and called safe. What a lot of buyers do not see is that the most commonly used method to check our products is by harming the lives of
various animals. Animal testing should not be a permissible testing method that is used in the clinical and cosmetic world of products and ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
If consumers would be aware of what happens before these products are declared safe, there would be a decreased amount of purchases or certain
products (Madar, A., Huang, H. H., & Tseng, T. 2013).
Our decision to purchase the products we do rely on many aspects including propaganda, popularity and the awareness that the products are reliable.
Informing the public of the process the products go through in order to be sold could spark a relationship between the products consumers intend to
buy ((Madar, A., Huang, H. H., & Tseng, T. 2013). Some may argue that the consumers do not need to know the process only that the product is safe,
because it is what is important. That is simply ignoring the problem and continuing with an unethical practice that in many cases does not meet with the
Animal Welfare Act. Companies find loopholes to use animal testing because the Animal Welfare Act excludes "the most
–used species" (Orlans, F.
Barbara. "The Injustice of Excluding Laboratory Rats, Mice, and Birds from the Animal Welfare Act."). The opposing side debates that these laboratory
animals are necessary for product use. There justification is that these animals do not experience the same pain as humans do. What they fail to see is
that the reason they are most commonly tested on is because they similarity they share with humans. If a medication soothes a patient the same way it
soothed the animal, then it can be concluded that the same pain was once

Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay
Nowadays, in order to completely understand about human bodies as well as the advance of biology, many researchers often carry out experiments on
animals. Animal experimentation has a lengthy and productive history in biological research, especially in biomedicine. Over ninety percent of studies
used mice and rat to cure cancer and improve immune system for human beings (1). Since using animals in experiments is a practical way to cure
many diseases, people overlooked the unethical action. However, animal testing should be forbidden because of its unsure benefits, morality and
wastefulness. Opponents of banning animal testing argue that using animals in research will cure and reduce diseases which will be an advance in
sciences, and animals also have many functions similar as humans. Nevertheless, animal testing is cruel and unmoral. Animals suffer pains at a same
degree as humans, and animals should also have the rights to live and liberate. Most of animal experiments did not contribute to human technologies;
there are many experiments only for curiosity and have no promising results in developing biology. People are misguided by the media and articles
which have no sources regarding scientists achieved medicines in animal testing which lead to the fact that many people agree with scientists using
animal freely in research. In brief, humans are limiting the rights for animals to live; the lack of animals also cause many environmental problems
which may harm our lives more

Animal Testing And Why It Should Continue
Isaiah Tuppince
Mr. Greer
English 2
October 21st, 2015
Animal Testing and Why It Should Continue Jeremy Bentham once said, "The question is not, 'Can they reason?' nor, 'Can they talk?' but 'Can they
suffer?'" Animal testing is becoming a conflict right now and I believe that Animal testing should be stopped because it is cruel and inhuman,
Alternative testing technologies exist, the lack of reliability, and it is expensive. Another quote once said was by Martin Luther King Jr stating
"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well–being of a person or animal is at stake" That quote is saying why do wrong when right
can be done, especially when people and animals are involved. Animals have feelings and enjoy life as much as humans do so keeping them in
captivity and testing drugs on them is cruel and inhuman. It is understandable that animal testing is helpful, and we can 't test drugs on humans, but
when alternative testing options are available there is no reason to keep animals in captivity and test drug, harm, and kill them. Center for Alternatives
to Animal Testing (CAAT) is a program that was designed to begin vitro testing. This program was established by Johns Hopkins. The CAAT was
created in 1988 and funded by more than 70 corporations (Hunter). These corporations funded this program to change animal testing a find alternative
ways to test drugs other than on animals. Millions of dollars were given to this program by these corporations to

Should Animals Be Used For Animal Testing?
Animal testing is the experiment of animals like mice, dogs, rats, fish, birds, and many non–human creatures for the effective production of vaccines,
drugs, and chemicals. It is estimated that more than one hundred million of animals are used for the experiments each year globally. Countries like
U.S.A., U.K., Japan, China, Canada and so on are on the top list in using animals for the experimental purposes. They are being used to make sure that
the vaccines and drugs manufactured are safe and defend against the pathogens. Almost ninety percent of vaccines and drugs are tested in a similar way
before examining against humans. So, I believe that animals should be used for scientific testing.
Animals testing has resulted in the development of new drugs and vaccines for cures and treatments. Professor Sir George Radda, the former chief
executive of the Medical Research Council states that "animal research is essential to tackling major twenty–first century health problems such as
cancer and heart disease. Without the use of animals, it would be impossible, to develop drugs or any sort of medical treatment." For example, the
vaccine for hepatitis B virus was first tested on Chimpanzee to check its effectiveness against a virus. It showed the significant impact on a virus and
was proved to be safe for the patients suffering from liver cancer at the first stage. Likewise, the polio vaccine was also first tested on mice, rats, and
monkeys in the 1950s. Then only, the vaccine was

Animal Research : Is It Human Or Inhuman?
Animal research in psychology is a controversial issue that has raised many questions on whether it should be allowed Is it human or inhuman? Peter
Singer, a bioethicist, views animal research as a form of discrimination and for the most part useless in findings. Singer believes that animals and
humans are not very different from each other; hence, asking why not test on humans too if it is okay on animals? On the other hand, R.G. Frey, a
professor of philosophy, argues that animal research should be allowed since their meaning of life differs from ours. Also, Frey states thatanimal testing
had led to significant research. So, who is right?
Singer, in his book Animal Liberation (Ecco,2002), states the concept ofspeciesism. Speciesism ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, Singer illustrates an example of a dog undergoing varies shock from jumping to floors that each had the shock. Eventually, the dog
stopped resisting, and thus researchers stated that the experiment should how to eliminate jumping in dogs. Singer saw this as up scoured and
unnecessary. This example can be seen as psychological since it determines the behavior of dogs after an experiment. Now many people may agree
with Singer and find this inhumane but will agree with the medical animal research. Frey, in "Justifying Animal Experiments: The Starting Point" in
Ellen Frankel Paul and Jeffery Paul, eds., Why Animal Experimentation Matters: The Use of Animals in Medical Reseach (Transaction, 2001), states
"Genetic research involving animals promises new treatments for diseases that previously were thought to be intractable defects in the human
condition". Many people would agree that these animals testing to be useful since it helps medical issues, yet do not realize the hypocrisies of agreeing
with animal testing that benefits them while disagreeing with animal testing when it hurts them in psychological.
Frey 's argument that animals cannot be distinguished from humans can be true. For example, Frey, in "Justifying Animal Experiments: The Starting
Point" in Ellen Frankel Paul and Jeffery Paul, eds., Why Animal Experimentation Matters: The Use of Animals in Medical Reseach (Transaction,
2001), says "...we do not know what an animal 's quality of life is may well

Persuasive Essay On How To Stop Animal Testing
Imagine looking into the eyes of an animal that is used for scientific and commercial testing. What would you see? Sadness, fear, maybe pleading
looks that grasp at the soul. These are the animals used for live testing. Some animals are even killed in order to do scientific testing. This paper takes
a look at animal testing and how to stop it.
It is shocking that "An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing," explains
procon.org. Animals such as rats, reptiles, and sometimes even dogs are used for products we use on a daily basis such as medicine, cosmetics, and
hygiene products. According to procon.org, research animals have been practiced on since at least 500 BC. That's a long time and
"Physician–scientists such as Aristotle, Herophilus, and Erasistratus performed the experiments to discover the functions of living organisms," states
procon.org. Animal testing should be forbidden because it is unethical and not right to torture these innocent creatures who have as much of a purpose
as humans do in this world.
There are many reasons why animal testing should not be done and one reason is that it is bad science because not every medicine or product that is
tested works. Imagine giving a lot of money to a charity and then finding out that it did not go to a charity but to a scam. It is sickening and when an
animal life is given for the testing of medication or used in a medication and it doesn't work it is

Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing
For centuries humans have dedicated their time and research to animal experimentation. A large number of these animals are being utilized and taken
from their homes involuntarily. They are abused, mishandled and harmed for our own benefit to create products such as cosmetic supplies, vaccines,
and medication.
Without a doubt, these animals are in pain. They whimper out of fear and struggle to survive in the conditions they are forced to undergo. Many of
them are even put into isolation and sedated heavily. They are given no say to how they want to live and are dealt with horribly, which is whyanimal
testing should be stopped because there are many other alternatives that can be used.
In the article, Animal Testing 101, Peta, a well–known campaign who advocates for animal rights exposes the truth of the reality of animals who are
used for testing. They published a 60–second long video of what happens privately in an Animal Institution revealing multiple clips of animals being
grabbed, stomped, and held aggressively. Additionally, in the video, it also shows animals who have become physically and mentally damaged. They
begin to harm themselves and take part in unusual behavior. "The complete lack of environmental enrichment and the stress of their living situations
causes some animals to develop neurotic types of behavior such as incessantly spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own fur, and
even biting themselves."
This only goes to show you that animal testing is wrong because it only perpetuates torment and abuse. These animals have no say in how they want to
live and are forced to take part in medical research when in actuality they would rather roam outside into the real world living the life that they were
supposed to. Animal testing only prevents that which is why scientists and researchers should begin to try new things such as using alternatives so that
animals will not suffer anymore.
One alternative that can be used is Vitro Testing. Vitro testing is a method specifically done with glass where scientists can monitor cells and tissues of
living organisms. Vitro is very beneficial to use because it can produce accurate results without having to use animals being that human

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
Animal Testing Should be Outlawed Testing has been done on animals since around 500 BC ("Background"). Animal testing is something that has
obviously been around for a while, but it is something that should go away in the near future. Testing of products on animals instead of using other
forms of testing is something that is socially acceptable nationwide; the whole process should be outlawed due to new discoveries enabling testing to be
done in vitro. Animals are used in testing for many different things. These things include, but are not limited to, developing medical treatments,
determining medicinal toxicity, checking safety of products that are designed for human use, and other uses, involving both biomedical and health care.
The agencies and institutions use animals that are not capable of opposing the testing that they are subjected to in any way whatsoever. It is estimated
that around 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing ("Background"). When animals are used
for testing the scientists are testing drugs, vaccines and other biologics, and medical devices. This is done to determine the safety of the medical
product without testing it on humans. When testing drugs and biologics, the main focus is the drug's nature, pharmacology, and toxicology.Animal
testing is used to measure "how much of a drug or biologic is absorbed into the blood, how a medical product is broken down chemically in the body,
the

Animal Testing Is Morally Wrong? Essay
Humans are animals, and as such it is morally wrong to use them to test pharmaceuticals intended for use by humans. Those who support animal
experimentation believe it is a necessary evil, in part due to the false information put out by the media. The so–called benefits of animal testing have
not helped humans for years, yet in many countries the law still requires researchers use animals to test their medications. In fact, although alternatives
have been found, few steps have been taken to put an end to animal experimentation. Unfortunately, the way the activists present their argument that is
one main reason they are not taken seriously, even though their points are valid. Animal testing is morally wrong and has not benefited humans as the
media has claimed, but there are alternatives, such as new technology, if only humans would take the first step. Animal testing is inhumane and
unethical based on the scientifically supported claim that humans are also animals. Animals deserve to be treated on the same level as humans and
humans have much to learn from them. One could argue an extreme point of view that testing animals is similar to testing a family member, such as a
cousin. In Ferdinando Boero's "Humans Are Animals," he takes the stance that anthropologists and zoologists are in the same scientific sector. His
claim is supported since humans are animals, then zoology is a part of anthropology. They can use this to help contribute to each other's research, if only

Animal Testing Should Be Outlawed Essay
Throughout the world, right under the human nose, millions of innocent and helpless, animals are being tortured and murdered. They are used for
product testing as well as to put into products without consumer knowledge. These defenseless animals are deprived of respect and are victimized to an
extent where it becomes unbearable to watch. There are many organizations that are trying to fight for animal rights. However, these organizations
struggle with is because there is no legislation in the United States to combat animal testing. Even though it is not against United States regulations,
animal testing should be outlawed because of its harmful and cruel effects.
If people were to see how these animals are really treated, everyone's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These people will test on any animal that they think will help them get to a closer reaction as of a human would receive. These people are very
callous to any animal that comes their way. All these animals are coerced into these terrible factories were they are bred and used until they die.
So why is animal testing used if it is in fact so harmful to the animals? Animal testing is used by scientists in order to test certain products. It is often
used by cosmetic companies, pharmaceutical companies and other research institutions. Researchers often test new medicines to see if they can be
used on humans. They check to see if animals will have reactions to certain medicines or beauty products. For example, they test to see if there are any
serious side effects from a medicine that can cause serious harm on a human. Animal testing is used to see what is potentially beneficial for a human or
what is potentially harmful. But if they aren't safe on humans, then they definitely are not safe on animals.
There are millions of companies and research institutions that use animal testing. They believe that the research and information gained from animal
testing outweighs the harmful effects. Scientists believe that they are making an impact on the world and that they are providing good outcomes. One
possible positive outcome of animal testing is that it is almost guaranteed that humans will have no serious side effects and that the products are safe
for use. However, to

Animal Testing Is Ethical Essay
Animal testing is the ethical issues being addressed in this article. There has been a development with the use of animal research that the drug for
Ebola has shown success by being tested on monkeys, and also there is a new treatment for a brain tumor that uses animals. There has been an
outpouring from animal rights communities that condemn the use of animals in medical research. These groups are pushing for a ban. In order for
human trials to begin, there has to be a number of animal model studies done. In 2013 there was a Phase III clinical trial at the University of PA and
Georgetown that used mice and primates to shrink tumors. This led to a breakthrough to treat patients with melanoma. Looking past the success
testing on animals has contributed, activists still say that there needs to be elimination. Trull states, "those who doubt this value need only look at
the faces of patients in the Duke Trial whose lives have been saved by these essential research techniques". The first ethical concept is Midgely's
"cook book "recipe for moral dilemma (Boss, 2014.p67). The issue being raised is the testing on animals. The animal rights groups have followed all
the steps for trying to resolve a moral dilemma. The animal rights groups look at animals ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Can animals be part of a moral community? Moral rights and principles apply to those who are apart of the community. According th the third ethical
concept of universal theory "there are universal moral values that apply to all humans, in some cases extend beyond the human community" (Boss,
2014, p.10) This could imply that we have a moral obligation to animal, but we also have one to humans. All people "deserve the protection of the
community" but some would argue animals aren't apart of it (Boss,2014,p.10) WE have an obligation to humans, and research studies look past this to
help stop human suffering in their moral

Animal Testing Should Not Be Practiced
For many years, animals have been used as experimental hosts for treatments and products that exist today. These animals are live hosts, making them
open to experiencing every torturing pain that is inflicted on them by the experimenter. A majority of animals that are tested on later die. Animal testing
does not give accurate results relating to humans. These tests should not be practiced any longer. There are many individuals who believe that animal
experimentation has only positive outcomes. They argue that animal testing has provided a plethora of life–saving cures and treatments. Animals are
also seen as perfect hosts, because they are similar to humans. Animals are believed to react to certain chemicals the same way as humans ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
With the conditions these animals live in and the pain that they experience, it is unsure whether the results are accurate simply because the subject is
not healthy. Many people believe that animals are so similar to humans because they have the same organs that function in the same way as humans
do. They even believe that they are perfect subjects because they are susceptible to the same diseases and illnesses as humans. Conversely, animals
and humans are different. Their size and metabolic system are a few examples. Rats are used a lot in research, but humans greatly exceed a rat's
average size. Therefore, a rat's capacity of a certain drug is extremely different from a human. This goes for all animals. Animals also metabolize faster
than humans, meaning that all the chemical reactions in animals, such as healing process and production of ATP, are achieved at a faster rate than
humans. These differences make it more difficult to determine the outcome of a human who is exposed to the same drug as the animal. Since animals
are seen as having very similar reactions to certain substances as humans do, they are considered to be the perfect experiment group. However, these
researchers can be easily mislead into ignoring potential cures during animal experimentation. There are some substances that are harmful to animals
but not to humans. According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, MD, MPH, "Aspirin is

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
Animal Research Is Invalid
Experimentation of animals has animal rights advocates and some scientists questioning the effectiveness and validity that animal testing has a
meaningful impact on medical advancement. Dating back to the 2nd century B.C., early Greek scientists performed experiments on living animals for
the purpose of advancing their knowledge and understanding of the human body. However, recent research has proven that animals rarely serve as
good models for the human body (Animal Testing, 2015). Everyone agrees that animals are used for research. Some people believe that it is unethical
treatment of animals, while others believe that animal testing is necessary for the advancement of improving human health. (People for the, 2014).
Experimentation on animals is costly, unethical, and unreliable, and should be prohibited.
Researchers spend millions of dollars each year on animal experimentation and healthcare costs continue to rise due to drug–related injuries, while
treatment and prenatal centers close because they lack necessary funding (Animal Testing, 2015). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has
reported that, "...adverse events associated with drugs are the single leading contributor to preventable patient injury, and may cost the lives of up to
100,000 Americans, account for more than 3 million hospital admissions, and increase the nation's hospitalization bill by up to $17 billion each year."
(Results from Research, 2015). These numbers are staggering.

Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned
Poliovirus is a contagious infection that rampaged through the United States about fifty years ago, with the possibility of leading to lifetime paralysis.
In the 1950s, Jonas Salk and his team developed a polio vaccine that prevented the outbreak of polio ("Polio Vaccine"). During his pursuit of the
creation of the vaccine, mice, monkeys and rats were used to test the side effects and effectiveness of the new vaccine. Without it, polio would have
become a worldwide malady. Animal testing is the procedure of using various animals to research for new drugs, vaccines or cosmetics. However, there
are many opponents against animal testing on the basis that it is unethical and that it is harmful to the subjects of the research. Nonetheless, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even in high schools, colleges, and medical schools, animals are used as part of most instruction about dissection to explore the anatomy of
different organisms and how the animals' body would compare to the human body. How many cadaver bodies would a medical student waste if they
did not first learn where to cut or the right way to cut? The application of animal research has lead to many discoveries in the medical departments.
For example, mainly dogs have been used to develop cardiac techniques such as cardiac bypass, angioplasty and heart transplants, mice and monkeys
have been used in the trials to find new remedies for HIV and AIDS, mice were used in the discovery of antibiotic medication such as penicillin and
various animals were used in the research for cancer treatments such as chemotherapy drugs and radiation therapy ("Why do Scientists"). In the absence
of animal testing, there would be physicians or scientists, the health care system would be completely eliminated and the world would be permeated
with incurable diseases.
The use of animal testing is to examine "how much of a drug or biologic is absorbed into the blood, how a medical product is broken down
chemically in the body, the toxicity of the product and its breakdown components, and how quickly the product and its metabolites are excreted from
the body" ("Why are Animals"). During the testing of medicine, animals

The use of animals in the medical realm has been prominent for a long time, in fact, it dates back to ancient Greek times. Although there are many
controversies surrounding it there are those who object the use of animal experimentation in any research sphere including the medial aspect. Some
argue that there is a need for animals in the medical field, suggesting that animal experiments are necessary for the advancement of medicine. Although
the causes that give rise to animal testing may sound justified. Animal testing itself has given rise to those who oppose it, the animal rights activists. The
use of animals may have been necessary to the medical domain in the past, but there are plenty reasons why animal experimentation should not exist
today or nor in the future. Such as the ethicality of using animal, the options of a variety of alternative methods and lastly the questionable scientific
accuracy of the research.
The Two Perspectives
There are generally only two perceptive to animal testing debate, those who support it and those who oppose it. The first of the two is those who are
pro–animal testing and fully support the use of animals in the medical domain. These people generally consist of researchers who believe animal
testing is justified by the many benefits that animal research in the medical domain can provide to human health and medicine. The second perceptive
is those who oppose it. This side consists mostly of animal activists, who support and fight for

Essay on Animal Rights
Animal Rights
The 20th century has had more medical breakthroughs than any other hundred years in history. But there is a price. No significant discovery in this
time has occurred without the use of animals in biological research experiments. Heart surgery, polio, osteoporosis, diabetes, AIDS, and cancer have all
had significant breakthroughs thanks to these experiments(McCarty 15).
The use of animals in today's world is highly controversial. Our society eats animals and their products, wears them, uses them for entertainment, and
kills some species, such as rats and mice for being a nuisance. In a society which uses animals in all these different ways, it is ethical to use animals in
medical research. Many medical advances rely ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even though the direct cost of the animals is small, around 20% of all projects will involve an element of animal studies in amongst the other research
techniques. When animals are used in research there are strict regulations to ensure a minimum of pain and suffering for the subjects(UNMC).
Ultimately our overall understanding of diseases rests heavily upon studies of living systems, including animals. In the fight to save human lives,
animals are vital.
The Hot Zone reveals that animal research inadvertently led to an outbreak of Ebola near Washington DC. But this is a unique case where research
has harmed humankind. The U.S. has recognized the importance of animal research and were it not for the Animals (Scientific) Research Act of 1986
most scientists would have been charged with cruelty to animals by now. Because of these laws new drugs are tested on approximately 1,000 animals
before they can be released on the market(McCarty 81). This law would not exist if government officials thought these experiments would harm their
citizens. In fact due to animal research the human life–span has been increased by an average of 28 years(McCarty 15).
Though animal research has benefited millions of people world–wide it has its detractors. Hollywood celebrities are using their free time to pose naked
for billboards. To protest the use of animals in their make up and garment's

Animal Experimentation For Scientific Research
Animal Experimentation for scientific research is a contentious issues and the subject of much debate. On one hand it is considered morally wrong to
use animal solely for human benefit. On the other hand, removing animals, completely from the lab would impede any understanding of health, disease
and consequently affect the development of new and vital treatments. Two essential questions needed to be asked is does it work and is it ethical?
The first is easy : yes it works. However some would say there are alternatives to animal research , such as magnetic resonance imaging, computer
models and work on isolated tissues and cell cultures and that animal testing is not necessary. Where there are reliable alternatives such as these, we use
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Currently, the law in the United Kingdom states that any newly developed drug or cosmetic product must be tested on two mammals, one of which
must be a large non–rodent. However, since the Animals Act of 1986 the law insists that no experiment may be carried out if a suitable alternative is
available. Animal Experiments now requires three Home Office Licenses– one for the institution, one for the scientist and one for the project. The
scientists must clearly state the potential benefits of the experiment that is being carried out and that there is no other beneficial alternative available
for the specific experiment. Random inspections to the site and scientists are mandatory to evaluate the intention of the institution undertaken by
leading authorities which are mainly the Home Office. There is little talk of experimentation these days in the media and press even though they are
continuing at a rapid rate and if they are mentioned at all, they are expressed as doing no harm to the animals.
Animals are not affected by human illnesses caused by man 's unhealthy lifestyle such as alcoholism and drug addictions which plague our society.
Consequently, each animal used in experiments must be first made ill with the desired disease. Diabetes is caused by injecting poison to kill the cells
of the pancreas. Heart Attacks are caused by constrictions of the coronary

Essay on Animal Experimentation
I have always had a great admiration for animals. Being an animal owner of two dogs, I believe that they are a friend of the human and both benefit
from each other in the sense of company and joy. They are also great contributors to the balance of the eco system. These are some of the various
reasons why I chose this topic. In this research paper I will inform you, the reader of the horrible experiences that innocent animals have to endure due
to the fact that supporters believe that animal experimenting is a humane method of bettering our lives. Animal experimentation is a very substantial
issue that has been debated for a large period of time. The antagonism of animal experimenting is not a new issue. Numerous people support the usage
There are several areas of experimenting. One includes basic research, which is biomedical research to investigate animals in a physiological
manner where animals are seen more as machines and necessarily don't experience pain. There is also applied biomedical research where animals
are used for disease testing by testing and toxic substances and also surgical research is conducted where physical pain occurs .Another field is
regulatory testing of drugs, compounds and products and animals are forced take these substances according to regulations. Similar to routine testing
there is also routine testing for biological substances such as vaccines before they are put out for the use of people. In this field sadly the animals
have to develop the horrible symptoms of the disease itself before they are given the vaccine. Lastly, animals are used for educational purposes, where
animals are used for dissection in undergraduate classes and students often have no choice but to dissect the animals if they expect to succeed in their
career (Kolar, 114). Advocates of animal experimenting believe that animals should be used for the advancement of humans. They believe that is
ethical and uncruel to animals. Many also believe that animals don't have rights due to the fact that they are inferior to the human kind. They also
dispute that animal research is a great method towards the advancement of medicine and has contributed greatly over the past years. Lastly, they assume

The Animal Being Tested Essay
Just imagine someone picking you up placing you in a secluded laboratory, holding you against your will , and vehemently having your face and
body stuffed with makeup or any other cosmetic item. I look at this situation as if i was in the place of the animal being tested, I sat an dreamt
about it for a second, I thought to myself this is horrible and someone has to put an end to this immediately, If it is still going on.This topic has
always been a touchy one for me, Considering the fact I 've been pro animal my whole.When i say that i mean just measly thought of an animal
getting hurt or brutally chastised would put me down every time. What led me to feeling this way was a video that was shown to me by my older
brother when i was about five or six years old.My older brother was some what of a bully my younger sister and I, So when he showed me the
video i was expected it be one those videos where a dark demonic figure jumps out and franticly shocks you.So i was prepared for what was to
come,When the video began it displayed a gorgeous scenery of a farm which looked it the setting could be somewhere in southern California. hen the
title of the video displayed on the screen "Meat Frenzy" is what it said. By that point i was nervous and confused of what was to come next.So then the
unbelievable happened,The cameraman enters this factory looking barn.The following scenes contents was so gruesome and horrific it made me sick
to my stomach,There were machines carrying live cattle

The Cruelty Of Animal Hoarding In The United States
While the argument can be made that the animals are being treated equally as humans, others assert there is harm towards the animals. One should be
concerned with the pros and cons about animals. All evidence considered, rather than harming animals, one needs appreciate and merit the animals.
Obviously, animals over the years have been harmed by the society. But do the people knowthe animals are being harmed? According to
dosomething.org, it's been estimated that there are 900 to 2,000 new cases every year of animal hoarding in the US, with 250,000 animals falling
victim. Meaning that animals are going through one of the most egregious forms of animal cruelty, that has been affecting tens of thousands of animals
– particularly cats and dogs – in communities nationwide. Hoarders keep abnormally gargantuan amount of animals for whom they do not provide
even the most basic care. Animal victims of hoarders ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, animal protein weakens your bones, they tend to be acidic and your body is naturally alkaline. As an incident, the buffering solution
comes from your bones and it causes a lot of calcium to alkaline. Along with that calcium that is building block of strong bones. So, if your bones
are getting rid of calcium that's not a effusive thing for the bone health. Recognizing that some did not know that animals protein would actually not
"benefit" you but instead weakens your bones. To the Animal Waste and Waste Management: By definition, AFO's produced large amounts of waste
in small areas. As another example, a single dairy cow produces approximately 120 pounds of wet manure per day. The waste produced per day one
dairy cow is equal to that of 20–40 people. So, if the owners of the cows are willing to actually produce healthy dairy, and avoid the "healthy" dairy,
my theory is convivial that people should think about the products they sell before it's in the store

Should Animal Testing Be Justifiable Or Morally Wrong?
Administering different types of drugs, infecting innocent and defenseless animals with diseases, poisoning, implantations, and causing brain damage
are just some of the many horrifying elements of what animal experimentation truly is. Cosmetics, cleaning supplies, and personal care products are
only a small fraction of the many products used frequently by people that are tested regularly on animals for research–based and scientific studies.
Although some may be completely unaware of, we use a number of these products more often than we would like to think. There are people who view
animals as innocent creatures who cannot possibly fend for themselves, yet there are also others who view animals as testing material for human
benefit. The... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Not only these types of animals in the United States, but others around the world undergo extreme pain and suffering as the result of "advancing"
scientific and medical research and knowledge. These animals are commonly subjected to force feeding, food and/or water deprivation, physical
restraint, and infliction of burns and wounds. Therefore, should animal testing for all purposes be banned?
Some cannot help but feel extremely sympathetic for these animals that are being mistreated brutally on a daily basis. They endure and are forced
to face inhumane and extremely cruel tests and research often every day. It is even likely that they can spend their entire lives in a cage, from when
they are birthed to eventually when they are either killed off or die of intentional causes due to research and experimentation by scientists. Others
claim that animals have no sense of self and emotion, as humans do. These people also claim animals do not feel any emotions, pleasure, pain, and
suffering like we humans do so it is extremely justified to test on animals. As of now, there are many animals waiting to die in confined and cold
cages waiting for the next experiment to begin. For this reason, animal testing for all purposes should be banned. Animals have a range of emotions
and can feel extreme pain and suffering just as humans do. A scientist may be unaware and may not realize when an animal is in severe pain and/or
distress (Rowan 89). With the suffering that

Animal testing has been a topic of debate for decades. Traumatic pictures of animals being abused cover social media pages. It's no doubt the tests are
inhumane, breach hundreds of animal rights, and cause unimaginable suffering and pain but, is it all necessary?
Despite the cruelty that is behind animal testing, it's impossible to deny that it has achieved amazing things. Animal tests have saved millions of
human lives around the world. They played major roles in the development of antibiotics, organ transplant surgeries, and vaccinations for deadly
diseases. These drugs and surgeries are some of the most important medical breakthroughs ever. Virtually all of the medicine we have today
wouldn't be possible without being tested on animals. As well as medicine, most cosmetic brands either conduct animal tests themselves or use
chemicals they know are safe from previous tests in the past. Everything from makeup to cleaning products all starts of in an animal testing lab.
The reason animal testing has been seen as the only way of experimentation for so many years is that of animals likeness to humans. Animals are
the perfect test subjects to investigate how diseases spread over generations. They grow similar to us but much faster. It is said by scientists that if
animal testing is stopped, no more medical steps will be made in the future. There will never be a cure for cancer or a vaccine for aids, paralyzed
people will never walk again and people with mental illness will

Animal Research Arguments
Animal research is a controversial topic that has polarized the public as we know it. It has created a whole sector of social activism in American and
in multiple parts of the world that is dedicated to put a complete halt to this form of research, but if it on their terms. When we analyze the benefits and
the cost the argument to continue animal research clearly outweigh halting animal research. Animal research has allowed for the creation of multitude
medical advances not only for human being, but for animals as well. Also, researchers have developed many techniques to minimize the pain of
animals. To begin with, researcher understand that the usage of animals in research should be taken with delicate care and consideration. That is why
"before any animal is tested a Home Office License to conducted animal research has been acquired" (Ethical Guidelines for Conducting Research). To
get a Home Office License researcher go through a pain–staking process of having their experiment be teared apart and their credentials being
questioned. Most individuals cannot even imagine that researcher go through this because when they are asked most are "not familiar with the ethical
guidelines and strict federal, state, and local regulations [that] govern the care and use of animals in research" (Bennett). So, to allude to researchers
not being compassionate towards animals is a fallacy. In addition, researchers and scientists have started using "The three Rs" (Bbc). These

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of
animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of
diseases and possible cures. According to the US–based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last
century– for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to
use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal
testing, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A Judeo–Christian interpretation from the Bible stated that "dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed
for most people to mean that each person has responsibility for animal welfare (Aquinas T., 2006)." Animal testing is essential for developing lifesaving
treatments. Due to experiments on animals we have treatments for diabetics, tuberculosis, breast cancer, malaria and brain injuries. Immunizations
against mumps, polio, and hepatitis has saved a countless number of lives thanks to the discovery of new drugs. Roughly ninety–five percent of all lab
animals are special–bred mice and rats. The balance of animals that are tested on is rabbits, guinea pigs, sheep, pigs, and fruit flies. Rodents are
considered the number one choice for modern medical researchers because they have a short life span. They choose animals that have a life span of
two to three years because that allows the scientists to observe what happens during the "fast forward" stage. Six out of the eight major discoveries
were recognized with Nobel Prizes, some of which involve the bone–marrow transplant, cloning of genes, and the detection of proto–oncogenes in
normal DNA. The essential need for animal research and observation is supported by health agencies and medical associations around the world.
Animal experimenting is the best and the safest

An Inside Look at Animal Experimentation Essay
Does everyone remember their very first animal? Remember the puppy's sweet and perfect eyes, the kitten's soft and comforting "meow", or perhaps
even a hamster and their playful and enthusiastic personality? These loving, innocent, precious animals are used daily on animal experimentation. With
each and every chemical–related product produced, experimentation is required before being released into stores; unfortunately, these tests are typically
performed on blameless animals. However, just because testing of a particular product on an animal results positive, does that undoubtedly mean the
results will be equivalent for humans? For instance, cigarette smoking was once considered "safe" because types of cancer associated with smoking are
Why, because almost every American citizen is naive enough to believe that each product has testing done (typically performed on animals) before
being sold on the market, ordinarily for safety purposes. However, what the general public fails to comprehend is that although specific types of
animals are nearly identical to human beings, there is always a cautious chance that the testing has positive results on animals but conversely, the
outcome may be significantly different for humans. Recently, researchers warned that "patients and physicians should remain cautious about
extrapolating the finding of prominent animal research to the care of human disease ... poor replication of even high–quality animal studies should be
expected by those who conduct clinical research" (Animal Experiments: Overview). Diseases that are artificially forced upon animals in a laboratory
are under no circumstances identical to those that transpire naturally in human beings. For example, cigarettes were formerly indicated as "safe"
because it did no harm to animals whereas cigarettes are typically known in today's generation to cause illnesses such as lung cancer. More importantly,
several researches to cure cancer and its' questionable motives have been successfully completed on mice although the solution has had no effect on the
human body. Also, more than eighty–five HIV/AIDS vaccines have been prosperous in nonhuman archbishop studies, but as of 2013 every

Have You Ever Seen A Cruelty Free Symbol In The Shape Of
Have you ever seen a cruelty free symbol in the shape of a rabbit on the back of a shampoo bottle? That means the bottle's contents were made without
it being tested on an animal first. But what if the symbol wasn't on the bottle? Have you ever thought of what would happen to that bunny you would
usually see in a pet store? To answer this question, commonly, animals put through experimentation are put through force feeding, food deprivation, and
inflictions of wounds. That bunny probably is not okay right now. Cosmetic companies all over the world endanger the lives of animals to test toxicity
and irritation of products. In order to test these characteristics, the products are placed on the skin and eyes of animals. If a rash occurs, or if ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This gives humans a superiority, which leads them to believe that harming animals does not need consent and is allowed. Therefore,animal testing
should be illegal because the harming of helpless animals although they are capable of experiencing pain, is immoral. It also gives an unnecessary
feeling of superiority to those inflicting the pain upon them. (Arguments) (Animals) Animal experimentation has proven to be barbaric so far, but did
you know it could also be unreliable? ВЁ94 percent of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials.ВЁ (Animal) To accurately test drugs
for the safety of the human race, animals would need to be extremely similar to humans, however that is not the case. For example, animals do not
get as many diseases as humans do, such as alzheimer 's or HIV, drugs like as aspirin could be fatal to animals, and foods, like chocolate or
macadamia nuts are poisonous to dogs. Humans, as we all know, experience the opposite. Also, ВЁusing rodents such as rats, to test the safeness of a
drug is only error–free 43 percent of the time. ВЁ(Arguments) In a laboratory there can be multiple variables causing the drug tested to be unreliable.
For example, if the animal is stressed, it can influence the results of the test. ВЁStressed rats, for example, develop chronic inflammatory conditions and
intestinal leakage, which add variables that can confound data.ВЁ(Akhtar) Therefore, using animals to test if drug is safe for

Animal Testing Pros And Cons Essay
CON Position: Proponents /Perspectives Against: While the pros to animal research are positives on humans, it is negatively affecting the animals
themselves. Using animals for medical research is inhumane because they are left in these awful conditions. These animals are being mistreated in
captivity because humans need them for their own research. The animals used in these experiments are treated very poorly because, they are subjected
to force feeding, forced inhalation, deprived of food and water, excessive physical restraint, and may acquire infections and other wounds while in
captivity ("Animal Testing", 2017). Animals like these are burned, choked by CO2 and even left days without food or water. Sometimes we just test
to see what the LD50 is for these animals, over 97,000 animals were killed just testing to find the LD50 from these animals. The LD50 is just a test to
find out how much of one substance will kill 50% of the population. These animals are harmed for no reason because, most of the time it does not even
help humans. Animal tests while have been successful in the past, more than likely won't lead to successful transition into humans. Being used in
medical research for years animals have led to some successes and scientific breakthroughs, but most of the time end up failing and hurting the
animals instead of helping humans. Studies by the Food and Drug Administration found that about 92 of 100 drugs that passed the animal tests had
failed in humans ("Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing," 2017). Humans have become very developed medically over the last hundreds of
years or so. To become more advanced has come with a drawback, harming millions of innocent animals. Most of the time when doing these types of
research we end up finding something that would work or barley work in animals but will never work in humans. Animal research has led to very few
breakthroughs compared to the many that have been attempted. With such a low success rate it seems we should be able to find a better more efficient
way to find a cure rather than using animals.
There are alternative options for medical research as animals have failed us for hundreds of attempts. One other type of testing is called vitro

Animal Testing Essay
Animal experimentation has notably advanced the medical field since its beginnings nearly two thousand years ago. Modern surgeries, antibiotics, and
vaccines have been discovered and put into effect to better the lives of humans worldwide and increase our life expectancy by thirty years. However,
animal rights activists argue that tests are not accurate or reliable due to angularities. Morality continues to toy with the minds of the public. Religious
organizations, like the Catholic Church, approve of animal testing when it is used to improve the means of health treatment, but the experiments must be
as humane as possible. Along with this, the Catholic Church does not consider the cosmetic industry to be included in the realm of health treatment.
New laws and restrictions made on testing is slowing research and making the experiments costly. These added obstacles are making the discovery of
new treatments are cures difficult. While animal research has greatly expanded our knowledge of the body, diseases, and possible medicines, scientists
are working to treat and cure deadly diseases like AIDS and cancer.Animal rights activists are fighting to stop this. Despite what activists say, there is
not a single person who has not benefited in one way or another from animal testing. Scientists are looking for ways to refine and reduce testing, but
until the day when health treatment is completely advanced, we cannot abandon the use of animals in research.
Animal Experimentation

Cruelty Of Testing On Animals
For many years companies have tested their products on animals. Testing on animals does hurt them. Anything from, keeping them in cages to
completely killing them. Petitioners have tried to end animal cruelty, and recently the numbers have decreased dramatically. That does not mean that it
has been completely cut out of the manufacturing process. There is other means of testing a product then on innocent animals that have no say in their
life. Animal testing has been used since the 1800's. For years companies have had scientist conduct product testing on animals to see how they perform.
This is unjust to animals and needs to stop. Britain is one of the few countries that have put an end to it. The Cruelty to Animals Act introduced in
1876, which was an attempt to regulate animal testing. The United States does not have such laws prohibiting animal testing. The main problems lie in
cosmetic brands. Makeup companies have the highest percentage of animal cruelty. Although, there are select few that have found other ways they can
see if their product works. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Companies claim that they do this to benefit us humans, to make it safe for us. In doing this animals are being harmed. When a cosmetic product is
being tested, they used rabbits primarily. The process they use is to rub chemicals onto freshly shaven skin or rubbed on their eyes. There is other
ways products could be tested. Companies can use chemicals that are already known to be safe. Animals are innocent creatures. They do not have the
ability to speak for themselves. Just because they cannot take action, defiantly does not mean we can take advantage of them. Animal testing needs to
stop. There has been a drastic decrease in the use of animal testing since the 1800's. I believe that it will eventually be abolished if more people were
educated on the issue. Companies could potentially save money and animals if they use other means of

Animal experimentation is defined as the use of "non–human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or
biological system under study." ("Animal research"). Animal experimentation can be dated all the way back to Greek writings during the third century.
Aristotle, (384 – 322 BC) a physician–scientists; physician–scientists are physicians who pursue their research interests in the laboratory, and Dr.
Galen, (129–200 AD3) known as the "father of vivisection", stated by, Thomassen, et al. (2), when they began experimenting on live pigs. Aristotle and
Dr. Galen began animal experimentation to gain knowledge of the animals themselves, unlike current day which is used for medical research. Animal
research ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That divide sparked the British Cruelty to Animals Act, which set limits on animal experimentation. Due to the progression of medical research by
experimenting on animals, the Cruelty Act fell apart. In 1986, nearly 110 years later, a new Act was established to regulate the use of animals in
medical research. The Animals Scientific Procedures Act started in the UK which led to the Protection of Animals Act in 1911, now known as the The
Animal Welfare Act, signed in 1966. This worldwide Act regulates that owners have a duty to take care and not neglect the animals basic needs such as;
adequate nutrition and veterinary care, regulating the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, and transporting. Even though the animals are
protected by this act, animals are still being used for medical research that cause negative side effects leading up to, and including, death. A group
called PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), started in 1980 and founded by Ingrid Newkirk and Alex Pacheco, is an American animal
rights organization. PETA is the largest animal rights organization in the world with over three million

Controversy Over Animal Rights
As we develop and create new technologies to help aid us in the bright new ambitious world we have set fourth today, we often come across
problems. These problems will naturally occur one after the other because of the result that we make progress to fast. One of these popular issues that
we have in our society is the constant debate over animal rights. In order for us to create ground breaking science and medicine we must believe it is
acceptable to experiment and potentially harm animals as long as they advance the quality of human life. Ignoring animal rights can create better
advancements in medicine, and variations of food. However, we can't ignore the constant slaughter of animals which are not humane for no reason, this
is something ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to the ASPCA "Approximately 7.6 million companion animals enter animal shelters nationwide every year. Of those, approximately 3.9
million are dogs and 3.4 million are cats. Each year, approximately 2.7 million animals are euthanized (1.2 million dogs and 1.4 million cats). In this
study, we can see how many domestic animals are being abused. These animals are simply suffering for the enjoyment of the owner, and these
animal's deaths are most importantly meaningless because the death didn't lead to any technological advancements in the medical field or contributed
to its society. This is something that could rapidly spread if we ignore animal rights. We can also see millions of animals being killed and sold to the
black market for their rich ivory. Over 10,000 elephants have been killed in the past three years for their ivory stated by an article on national
geographic. This is yet again another claim that animal rights activist state that this is important. Overall ignoring animal rights can come with great
things but it also has its

Animal Experimentation And Its Effects On Human Life And...
Mathura Prasad Dahal
Instructor Miguel Marrero
English 1302
September 18, 2014
Animal Experimentation
The various experiments are performed on living animals especially to test the effects of chemical compounds such as new drugs, cosmetics, food
additives and pesticides. The application of animals to test a large number of products from household compounds and cosmetics to pharmaceutical has
been considered to be a normal strategy for many years.
Animal experimentation has existed since ancient times and contributed to human life and survival. The most radical progress in the health science has
all been made possible by animal research. Thus, animal experimentation is recognized and accepted as an important tool in saving lives.
Humans have been benefited from the health care developments that have been based on the benefits of animal research and testing for many years.
According to Fox Michael "Virtually every medical innovation of the last century – and especially last four decades – has been based to a significant
extent upon the results of animal experimentation." Surgery on animals has assisted in developing organ transplant and open heart surgery. "Animal
testing has also helped in developing vaccine against disease like rabies, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, and TB. Development of antibiotics, HIV
drugs, Insulin, and cancer treatments depend up on animal tests. Other testing methods are not advanced enough" (Vaughn, 171). Laboratory animals
can play an important

Animal Testing Animal experiments happen all over the world, but are they necessary? Animals are tested for medical research as well as for
cosmetics. Some say that these experiments are not painful, so they are justified. Where others believe that all these experiments are inhumane and
nothing can justify torturing and killing innocent animals. Although many believe that animal testing is the best way to improve human health by
finding new treatments and tests for the safety of the products, the physical torture and painful deaths of animals are not worth the possible human
benefits. Some people believe that animal testing is essential for the medical breakthrough, while others disagree. Thanks to biomedical research people
But recently modern research has proved that animals don't always represent as good models for human body. Computer modeling and in vitro testing
are new methods that have helped in research without using animals, but animal experimenters believe they still need to test on animals to protect
humans from harm. They don't believe the predictions that computer model provides because they are not always accurate. Instead of experimenting
on animals they should try to make these computer models better, so they could test how drugs and their targets work better and fit in the molecular
structures of each other. In addition, many people believed most animal experiments are not helpful to humans, and they don't contribute to medical
research. These experiments are done on basis of curiosity. Many argue that they use animals so new drugs are not tested on humans. Even though
multiple experiments are done on animals, the drugs are still tested on humans. Animals' tests are so unreliable. In fact, there have been some cases
where drugs were tested on animals and they didn't show any side effects, but when the same drugs were used by humans they suffered serious side
effects. For example, in the 1950s a drug named Thalidomide was tested on animals and was considered safe for the treatment of nausea in pregnant
women, but later on, it was discovered that the treatment resulted in severe birth defects

Is Animals For Medical Research Necessary?
Is using animals in medical research necessary? Some people would say yes, others would say no... but who 's right? No matter what one thinks or
believes this question still remains, yet to be answered. At first this question seems like its answer lies within ones opinion and only that, but if you
look closer there is a lot more to it than opinion. Feeling sorry for the animals is definitely where it starts for people who don 't agree with animal testing
; but that 's not where it ends.
Scientists and medical researchers say that animal testing is the future to finding cures. They also believe it is cruel to use animals to test our products
on but there are no other options. Using animals for testing helps them figure out what will work and not work on humans. Using animals can help find
cures faster and help prevent more human deaths.
Although some people believe that 's true, I have a different opinion. While reading articles from different doctors, I discovered that using animals in
the medical area hasn 't helped humans near what people think it has. Just because animals are living breathing creatures like us, doesn 't mean their
systems are anything like ours. In fact, they 're not anything like ours. There has been testing after testing done on animals to help find cures and
medicine that will work on humans. After all that... what do we have to show for it? A puzzle with missing pieces that we are not going to find... not
this way.
Ray Creek, a board –certified

The Use Of Animals For Research Testing Essay
In the society we live in, it is filled with debatable controversies. Figuring out a solution to an issue can possibly create quite a stir in our world. In the
cooperation of finding a solution, understanding both sides of an argument is very essential. This can help create a better outline of what outweighs the
other. With hundreds of topics to solve, there was one that stood out,animal testing. The use of animals for research testing is an issue that has been
debated whether or not it is acceptable or not. Within this questionable topic, our main focus is on the researchers, animals, users, and environment.
Terms that you may associate with animal testing would vary greatly, but there are some that can be used as an example such as testing, experiment,
abuse, negligence, and acceptable. Have you ever thought about these words as you purchase medication or makeup products? As each individual has
their own beliefs, is animal testing, acceptable? Not everyday will these words come to our mind as we pick up items from our local pharmacy or
store. Granting that there are certain products that are cruelty–free, majority of our daily necessities have been tested with the help of non–human living
organisms. The amount of harm that an animal may experience within an experiment of course would fluctuate due to the lab and researchers in which
the experiment is being conducted within. Although animal testing benefits humans, as it brings more medical advancement and less human–based

In Vitro Testing: An Alternative To Animal Experimentation
The first recorded experiment was by a philosopher named Alcmaeon of Croton in 500 b.c.e in Greece. He studied brain activity which involved
removing eyeballs from healthy animals (Rosen pg). The scientists that are testing on animals abuse them and neglect them (Animal Cruelty). A
solution is to use an alternative to animal testing testing called Human–Patient Simulator (Alternatives to Animal Testing).Another problem is that after
animals are testing on they get little to no pain relief (Rosen pg). A solution to this problem is In Vitro Testing (Alternatives to Animal Testing). If the
alternatives for animal testing do not start being using in place of animals then the 100 million animals that are harmed every year will not have to be
harmed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The animals are being abused by get tortured, mutilated, poisoned, or shot (Animal Cruelty). Animals are being kept in confinement which means that
they are being kept in unhealthy enclosures lacking fresh air, clean water, food, and sanitation (Animal Cruelty). Animals are neglected because
people fail to provide access to food, water, shelter, or sanitary conditions (Animal Cruelty). People also fail to provide adequate shelter from harmful
elements, such as the cold, heat rain, or snow (Animal Cruelty). The animals are lacking imprope,medical care and treatment (Animal Cruelty). In 1876
England's Parliament had passed the first national anti vivisection law, the Cruelty to Animals Act. The law covered only vertebrate animals
(mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, and amphibians), with more restrictive provisions on the use of donkeys, horses, mules, dogs, and cats. The law
required all experimenters to have permits, and it established guidelines for the kinds of experiments and the way they were performed (Animal Rights
). The people caring for the animal are not giving the animals proper care. The people taking care of the animals probably do not care about them
because they are just testing

Early Blood Transfusion

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Ashley Smith

More from Ashley Smith (18)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Early Blood Transfusion