Legislator And Delegate Analysis

Legislator And Delegate Analysis
In most countries there is a Legislature within the government. The Legislature has power over and
supervises the working of the democratic government. Legislators play a critical role in examining
and challenging the work of the government and passing legislation. Therefore every legislator
should act as a link between the Government and the electorate. This means that the role of a
legislator in ensuring the proper workings and function of government is critical in maintaining a
democratic and functional society, a legislator should be there to voice the interests of his
constituents.
On one hand, the legislature makes laws that affect the entire nation and are intended to be
beneficial for the society as a whole. On the other hand, the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Edmond Burke, the well known political theorist, expressed the tension between the roles of trustee
and delegate in a speech to his constituents in 1774. Questioning whether a legislator should be a
delegate, who simply voices the opinions and interests of his constituents. Or a trustee, offering his
own independent judgment of what is best for society even if it conflicts with the views of their
constituents. Burke came to the conclusion that a legislator should serve as a trustee: "Certainly,
gentlemen, it ought to be the happiness and the glory of a representative, to live in the strictest
union, the closest correspondence, and the most unreserved communication with his constituents.
Their wishes ought to have great weight with him; their opinions high respect; their business
unremitted attention....But his unbiased opinion, his mature judgment, his enlightened conscience,
he ought not to sacrifice to you, to any man, to any set of men living....Parliament is not a congress
of ambassadors from different and hostile interests, which interests each must maintain, as an agent
and advocate, against other agents and advocates; but Parliament is a deliberative assembly of one
nation, with one interest, that of the whole––where not local purposes, not local prejudices, ought to
guide, but the general good, resulting from the general reason of the whole. You choose a member,
indeed; but when you have chosen him, he is not a member of Bristol, but he is a Member of
Parliament." This dispute is very real for legislators, questioning whether to serve the needs of a
smaller group rather than a nation. Throughout history legislators have rather acted as trustees than
delegates. Most often adopting this because of personal philosophy or the complexity of a certain
issue. However the commitment to the interests of the constituents is strong, and when issues of
more local interest arise,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

In Chapter 5, “Women As Legislators” Han Discusses The
In Chapter 5, "Women as Legislators" Han discusses the lack of parity between men and women in
legislature. Han explains the premise behind legislature and that the number of people in legislature
corresponds to the amount of people they represent.
Research conducted by political scientist Cindy Simon Rosenthal investigated women state
legislators. Her conclusion was that legislative leadership has focused on solely men, without giving
acknowledgement to women and their contributions. Rosenthal divides legislative leadership into
two categories: aggregative (or transactional) and integrative (or transformational). Research claims
that men tend to take the aggregative approach to leadership and women have taken the integrative
approach. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Wilson points out that women are steadily gaining traction in legislature, but at a severely slow pace
when compared to other Western democracies. Over 30% of all Democratic state legislator are
women. Conversely, fewer than one in six Republican state legislators are women. The chances of a
woman winning or losing a political election is no greater than a man's chances.
Women just need to be interested, and most are not. Both political parties have created organizations
to attract women. EMILY's List is a Democratic fundraising organization that created Focus 2020, a
recruitment and training for female candidates and the Republican State Leadership Committee's
Right Women, Right Now program helped over 300 women run and win states office since it began
in 2012. Both parties have seen plenty of success with their programs. If America were to see a
female president, she would likely come from the Western or Northeastern states, as the Southern
states are reluctant to elect women. Finland, Norway, and Sweden have parliaments where women
hold more than 40% of the seats. In Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, New Zealand, Austria and the
United Kingdom, women hold over 30% of the seats in government. America does not even crack
the top 50 number of nations that have a sizeable amount of women in public office.
There are a few resources available for women interested in public office. The National Women's
Political Caucus of NJ (WPCNJ)

What Affects the Gender Make Up in the State Legislators...
What Affects The Gender Make Up In State Legislators And Does Gender
Matter?
Introduction
Does the relationship between the percent of state legislators who are women influence the policies
and laws that are passed in states? And, if so, what are the important areas that women exert greater
influence over? Is it abortion laws? Religiosity? Unemployment rates?
These are the questions that I will seek to answer throughout this research paper. Specifically, there
will be two main objectives: whether or not certain attributes of a state constituency contribute
negatively or positively in regards to the amount of seats held by women, and, if these attributes do
impact in a positive or negative manner, how big of an impact, once elected, do these women exert
power on a variety of issues.
I believe that not only would it be interesting to find out whether or not certain variables determine a
states legislature gender make up, but I think it is also important to know how big of an impact, if
there is an impact at all, that women legislatures have across a variety of issues and how their views
on these issues impact policy making decisions. We can use these variables to determine how to
better help increase gender equality and representation in the long run, especially with how society
has evolved in the last couple of decades alone. what President Barack Obama said is true during the
2014 state of the union address and that women are still making

My Regression Model Is A Simple Additive Linear Regression
Women and minorities get elected in local elections much differently. Minorities receive more votes
if they are running in a single member district, where the district is composed of a majority of the
minority. Women tend to get elected when there are multiple seats up for grab across a larger set of
districts (at large elections). My purpose in including the percentage of black legislators in a state
legislator was to see if states have to pick and choose: more minority legislators or more women
legislators, based on the way candidates get elected according to the state rules. I would expect to
see that states with more black legislators have fewer women legislators and vice versa. My
regression model is a simple additive linear ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The only variables in this model that are statistically significant, shown by p–values that are less
than .05, are Watching.television and cook.index. SG1 predicts that every one–minute increase in
the amount of television watched will be correlated with a .117 percentage point decrease in the
percentage of women legislators for a state. It also predicts that for every one–point increase in the
Cook index, there is a .338 percentage point increase in the amount of women in a state legislature.
This model has an adjusted R2 of .526, so it explains 52.6% of the variance in the womleg.2010
variable. SG2 observes the correlations between the percentage of women in a state's legislature, and
the Cook index, the density of the state, the percentage of a state's legislators that are black, and the
average amount of time in minute that a person in the state spends watching television each day.
Again, the only variables that are statistically significant are Watching.television and cook.index.
SG2 predicts that every one–minute increase in the amount of television watched will be correlated
with a .121 percentage point decrease in the percentage of women legislators for a state. It also
predicts that for every one–point increase in the Cook index, there is a .486 percentage point
increase in the amount of women in a state legislature. This model has an adjusted R2 of

People Think Representatives Should Respond : Their...
Democracy The author, David Doherty, in this article, "To Whom Do People Think Representatives
Should Respond: Their District or the Country", attempts to understand whether voters recognize the
incentives in a representative democracy and reward legislators for prioritizing district preferences
over the nations. In order to answer this question, the author performs two experiments by asking
participants to examine legislators who supported or opposed a certain bill. By understanding
people's responses, political scientists are able to evaluate whether the accountability principle is
constant with the mechanism built into Congress by the Constitution. Furthermore, from this study,
political scientists are able to examine whether voters ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moreover, legislators were randomly assigned to vote with their district or the broader public. At the
end, participants had to decide whom the representatives should answer too, the nation or the
district. Furthermore, the second experiment featured all the characteristics the first one had;
however, it furthered the analysis to help test the last two hypotheses. In addition to, the participants
were introduced with legislators representing the state of Missouri or the participant's own state.
After reading the information, all the participants in the second experiment were asked about their
standpoint of the bill and their evaluation of the representatives. Finally, within both studies, the
evaluations the participants made were measured on a scale from 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent) for the
farm subsidy bill, and 0 to 10 for the nuclear energy. Essentially, the author found statistically
significant and substantial evidence that supported all three of his hypotheses. For the first
hypothesis, in the Farm subsidy study, participants viewed legislators whom sided with their district
3.69 units more favorable than those whom did not, while in the Nuclear Energy study, the
comparable effect was 1.69 units (246). On the second hypothesis highlighted in the nuclear study,
the support for the legislators were 0.83 when they were presented as from the participants own
state, while the

Legislators Argue That Employees Are Losing Out, Even Though
Legislators argue that employees are losing out, even though the government requires businesses
that terminate pension funds to help pay out benefits employees. According to the collective
bargaining agreements labor unions will create employee pension plans and other benefits. Due to
the increase in pension and benefit plans per employee, businesses compare rates to the open
market. After the retirement of employees, businesses are required to fund pensions because of
pension plan agreements. Also, unions can increase pension and benefit plans when negotiating new
collective bargaining agreements, continually raising this business cost.
Interests the union itself may try to maintain, despite organizational needs or goals. Labor unions ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The social responsibility of businesses is the general idea that businesses should behave properly
and contribute to economic development while improving the workplace. Nonetheless, unions on
behalf of government workers are expanding while a majority of union members today now have
ties to a government individual, at the federal, state or local levels. Approximately 1–in–3 public
division workers is a union member, associated with about 1 in 15 for the private division
employees last year. Overall, 11 percent of wage and salary worker's in the United States are
unionized, down from 35 percent during the mid–1950s.
Local versus national unions and how these groups may affect future and global unionization. There
are different levels of the labor unions from local, to the general, and
to the national officers. They are responsible for bringing out the policies and programs
of the unions. Support for the union programs is not enforced. It 's agreed upon
constitutionally by locals attending. As a national union depends entirely on how well
local unions live up to the agreement they strike annually with all the other locals in our
union. A remarkable example of real equality in action is watching member express
amazement at how it was conducted. National unions tend to provide advice and
assistance for their members so the that they can be fully informed about different
decisions on matters that may affect their locals. All wages and conditions are directly

The Pros And Cons Of Legislators
Jesse M. Unruh Assembly Fellowship Essay Siagian The most pressing issue I would face as an
Assembly Member would be water conservation. The state's lack of action and initiative to conserve
water has led to California's worst drought in over a century. This has led to panic reactions behind
bills such as AB–1739, disregarding long–term economic impacts in order to fulfill short–term
needs. Legislators proposing bills are not taking into consideration effects on jobs, business, and
taxpayers. The answer to our drought will not be solved in a short amount of time, as a complex
issue such as this requires long–term thinking. The state needs to update the water capture delivery
systems and fix the groundwater problem due to a lack of regulation.

Legislators Have The Most Power Essay
I believe that the legislators have the most power . I feel like This because they make the laws and
without them making the laws wouldn't be laws to follow . I will give you three reasons why I feel
like the legislators have the most power . One reason is that they make laws for people to follow .
My second reason is that the legislature make the money and that they have other jobs to take care
of too. They have very busy people and I think they work harder . The president vedas' the laws / So
the president can take out a law or laws if he wanted to . This is my third why I think the legislature
have the most laws . Body Paragraph 1: Reason 1, evidence 1, explain why this backs you up!
Skills: Integration of Evidence; Explanation ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe this because the legislation makes the laws so that people can follow them .Respect them .
The way the state picks the house and senate is by having two per state . When the laws are made
the senate and house would have to confirm it to become a law .Therefore , When the state picks the
house and senate they have to serve for 6 years . *article 1 section 7 * . this is one of my reasons
why I think the legislative have the most power. Body Paragraph 2: Reason 2, evidence 2, explain
why this backs you up! Skills: Integration of Evidence; Explanation of Evidence; Word Choice
[Basic Outline] My reason number two . They make the money . they make the money so that
people can use it . So when people get checks they are using the money that the legislative made so
that they can use it . Also the legislative have other jobs too take care of . The legislative have other
jobs that they are in charge of or that they do . for example they help out with the military . they also
help out during wars . I believe they have the most power because they are busy and they can
multitask with any job . They are held responsibly with big jobs so they are the most trusted

Types of Influences on a Congressman During a Vote
1. What if all members of Congress voted the same way on a given situation? This certainly is not
the case. But imagine if members of Congress were not specifically robots, but just all felt the same
way on a certain situation? Pretty interesting to imagine but the reason this is not the case is because
of influences. There are three influences types of influences that sway a Congressman to vote the
way they do. The first influence is representational view. Author James Wilson says
"Representational view is the reasonable assumption that members want to get reelected, and
therefore vote to please their constituents" (Wilson, pg.340). Representational view sounds a lot like
trying to impress someone to get on their good graces or trying to please someone. When a
congressman votes like this, it really gets in the way of what is important. Do they really care what
is going on? It does not sound like it, according to James Wilson. When a congressman vote like
this, Wilson mentions the example of gun control and that sometimes they get conflicting views and
that whichever way they vote, it may cost them dearly in the next election. What is even more
frustrating is that "occasionally, members of Congress in this situation will try to be out of town
when the matter comes up for a vote" (Wilson, pg. 341). What is the point of being in Congress if
you are not going to be around for the major decisions? Just along for the free ride I am assuming.
All in all,

Legislators Should Do Longer Hours Essay
How can the legislators do their job, if the government is giving them limitations? In article 3
section 24 of the Texas Constitution it states "members of the legislature shall receive from the
public Treasury a salary of $600 per month" (Texas Constitution, 1876). Legislators are here to
discuss and approve laws. They should have the power and abilities to request an increase in their
own salaries. There are three reasons why I believe that legislators should get an increase in salary.
First reason, demanding lawmakers to work longer hours. Second reason, spending less time at
home away from family and friends. Lastly, putting career goals on hold. Legislators are making
sacrifices every day to best serve the people and they should in return ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Many legislators have unpredictable scheduling because things are not timely based when it comes
to passing the laws. They go through these long processes just to amend things that will best serve
the needs of society in the future. Lawmakers should not work longer hours unless there is an
increase in their pay for the extra time they are serving. That is the problem with this nation, people
are selfish and will not appreciate others for the hard work and dedication they set forward to make
things happen. Most legislators are demanded to work overtime because of the obsessive
conservative people wanting things perfect before moving on to another topic. The reason being that
most legislators are accepting the overtime is because they need the extra money to send back home,
so they can still in some way provide and support their families. At the same time they are working
extra hours just to get more work done to not get paid at all. If that's the case legislators would be
better off working at a restaurant for some extra money. When legislators are not working they need
to accommodate for another job. Ross Ramsey said, "Texas legislators are paid less than the people
who sack their groceries." Apparently legislators do not get paid very well until after eight years of
serving. At that point they receive sweet benefits and is guaranteed

Legislators Must Satisfy Both Constituents’ and Partisan’s...
The Constitution of California expects legislators, which includes both State's senate and House of
Representatives, to influence agency decision making, to build political support for increases or
decreases in agency funding to lay the political foundation for new programs and policies, and to
capture media attention and enhance the power of the California State Congress members. However,
not all legislators are able to fulfill their duties and comply with the state's expectations. Indeed,
their efficacy to serve California varies on the length of their experience, familiarity to government
system, and commitment to public service. Evaluating their performances for the past ten years,
legislators can be distinguished by their competence ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thus, most legislators always allocate enough personnel and staff resources for any constituent
services such as handling casework and managing pork barrels strategically. Also, they become
efficient as they continue to devote their time, informing their districts about the activities happening
in the capitol, maintaining good communication, and consistently explaining relevant issues that will
impact the lives of their constituent and even the entire California voters. Indeed, spending great
deal of time with their own districts help legislator to understand the needs of their constituents and
know whether their responsibilities are being accomplished. Secondly, lots of political experiences
and legislative active participations are needed in order to become an effective lawmaker. In order to
make bill a law, mastery of legislation procedures and well–rounded tactics are necessary to bargain
and compromise effectively with the competing demands of other legislators, parties, and
constituents. According to Gerard Padro Miquel and James M. Snyder, Jr.'s article titled "Legislative
Effectiveness and Legislative Careers," increased effectiveness is due to investment of human
capital through hands–on experiences. Looking at the website of CA Senate Majority Leader Ellen
M. Corbett, she has authored, co–authored, and sponsored more than twenty legislations. Since she
has been dedicated to public service, her experiences allowed her to pass

Professional Legislator Case Study
This was a very interesting discussion about Legislature ended on time and who were the losers and
winners of this session. With host Patricia Cunningham and her Media Panel Conor Shine form Las
Vegas Sun, Ben Botkin the Review Journal and Don Guevara KTNV Channel 13 Action News. This
discussion tied into one of our lecture or text readings. It's about which one is better for Nevada
Citizen Legislature or Professional Legislator. With Nevada with the infrequency of meetings, every
other year, as a negative. Also because they are not professional legislators and receive so little pay,
many times the citizen legislators are influenced by special interest groups. The lack of Nevada
having a Professional Legislatures hurts the state .The benefit

Rhetorical Analysis Of Lost In America By Douglas Mcgray
In his article "Lost in America," Douglas McGray focuses heavily on the problem of isolationism in
the U.S education system in order to prove that changes in the education of young Americans must
be taken. "Lost in America" was issued by Foreign Policy magazine in 2006, which reveals that
McGray's audience includes American legislators involved in the elaboration of the American
curriculum policies. McGray, who is the Editor in Chief of The California Sunday Magazine and
Pop–Up Magazine, discusses that America has an isolationist education system that fails to embrace
worldwide perspectives. To support his argument in the article "Lost in America," McGray builds
credibility through the use of anecdotes that surprises and shocks his audience, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
McGray states, "The United States can no longer afford an isolationist education, any more than the
world can afford an isolationist American Public" (McGray 359). By demonstrating that, McGray
provokes American legislators reasoning forcing them to recognize that changes in the American
educational curriculum must be done immediately. Contrarily, young Americans' lack of knowledge
about the world surrounding them will set the country down and consequently compromise the
future of the United States of America. In addition, this rhetorical choice supports McGray's
arguments challenging his audience intellectual to reflect about other possibilities to solve this issue.
Following these lines, McGray appeals to American legislators' action to incorporate multicultural
studies in the American educational system such as the history, perspectives and values of people
from distinctive cultures. McGray effectively uses this rhetorical choice proposing a very strong
intellectual ideal insisting that urgent changes will benefit most Americans giving them the
necessary knowledge to keep America great. McGray's use of tone and positioning strategy of this
quotation successfully persuades his audience leaving no space for doubts and opposing

Term Limits For Legislators Essay
Term Limits For Legislators
When the Constitution of the United States was adopted in 1789, it was without direction regarding
term limits for legislators. At the time, professional politicians were unheard of, and the idea of
someone serving for more than one or two terms was unlikely. So the Constitution did not formally
address the issue of term limits, although it was understood that officeholders would limit
themselves to one or two terms and then return to private life (1).
With the advent of the modern state, however, came the making of Congress as a career, and thus
the voluntary removal of oneself from office, as envisioned by the founders, is no longer regularly
undertaken in the United States Congress.
The structure of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"To many, it seem[s] that one reason Congress ha[s] lost touch with ordinary people [is]
because so many members [are] in Congress too long." (4) According to Ed Crane of the Cato
Institute, "Americans want to open up the political process. They want their fellow citizens
who live and work in the real world –– the private sector –– to represent them. Not career
legislators... It would allow good people from across the political spectrum to...participate in the
political process as candidates, even if they happen to have spent most of their life outside the
limelight in the private sector like the rest of us." (5)
Clearly voters support term limits for a variety of reasons, yet these reasons all share a common
feature: the desire for a more competitive electoral process, and the hope that term limits will also
limit corruption.
The strength of public support for term limits can be seen in the fact that several states voted to limit
the length of time their representatives can serve in Congress. By the middle of 1995, almost half of
the states had limited the number of terms for their representatives. This success of the term limit
movement at the grass roots level faced a serious setback when the Supreme

Pros And Disadvantages Of A Full-Time Or Part Time...
A Full–Time or Part–Time Legislature
Name
Institutional affiliation
A full time legislature is a legislature where the members consider their jobs as being full time. The
members are well paid and committees are well staffed. Legislators meet for the most part of the
year and are paid as full time employees. Their extended time in office and the ability to devote their
time to issues allows them to perform their duties more effectively. A full time legislature allows
adequate time for debate and hearings among the legislators and the public, therefore the decision
making process is more informed. Legislators do not have to meet all year round in order to get their
work done. Spending too much time in the legislature takes the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There are special sessions that are called by the governor. The legislative process in Texas is a
hybrid system with a combination of both the full time legislature and the part time legislature. The
140 day sessions is a short period to conduct all the business of the state and the constitution gives
the governor the power to call as many special sessions needed in order to complete important state
business. These special sessions are short and do not exceed 30 days. Reducing the duration of these
sessions is important to ensure that the government does not govern too much. At the end of a
legislative session any bills that have not been approved by both houses die on the last day of the
session. The governor can use the threat of a special session to motivate legislators to focus on
issues that are of concern to the governor. The compromises that are possible between Texas 140
day sessions and a full time approach include a reduction of costs and the availability of adequate
time to discuss and debate legislations. The sessions are limited to 140 days, but if there are issues
that need legislative attention, then the governor can convene special sessions to address these issues
(Tucker,

Essay On Congress Term Limits
When utterly stuck in a rut, accustomed to doing the same activities day after day, nothing
productive nor worthwhile gets done. In order to combat this, change needs to happen. The same
applies to members of congress. After years and years of sitting in Washington, congress men and
women accomplish little and get too comfy in their places. In the article "Term Limits Don't Work,"
Stanley M. Caress, a professor of political science, argues that term limits–a limit to the number of
terms that an official may serve–do not cure the ills of Congress. However, congressional term
limits should be enacted and they prove beneficial to the United States of America. Caress first
argues that term limits do not "weaken the grip that special interest lobbyists ha[ve] on lawmaking."
Lobbyists' jobs are to advocate the ideas of the American people; however lobbyists do not always
act as the perfect voice for the people. Instead, lobbyists use money to the influence of ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Often new people are elected into congress to shake things up a bit. If a newly elected legislator
does not hold strong opinions nor fight causes that they believe in than the American people who
voted the legislator feel let down. Caress believes that congressmen should hold an "understanding
of the rival party and learn how to find workable compromises." However, he finds that "[n]ovice
legislators...often see the other party as an enemy." Newly elected legislators do not really see the
other party as an enemy, but rather feel that they made promises to the American people and intend
to keep those promises. Because of this, they do not cave into what others bark at them while
Washington and instead, hold true to their beliefs and

My Career As A Legislator Essay
As a member of the House of Commons in the United Kingdom, the role of my political party in my
career as a legislator is an important and influential one. Members of the House of Commons are
party oriented and loyal to their political affiliation. As a member, I would strive to advance and
increase my party's presence in Parliament by acquiring safe seats, whether I belong to one of the
major parties like the national Conservative or Labour party (Roskin 53). The role that my political
party would undertake over my career would also be demonstrated by the way I would vote for the
legislation. Party loyalty and discipline cannot be entirely assured but as a career legislator, I would
have to follow the party line when placing my vote (Roskin 39). If I fail to follow the party line in a
vote, I would then risk losing nominations for reelection (Roskin 39). It is evident that a political
party could have a great role in my career as a member of the House of Commons. On the other
hand, as a member of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, the role that my party would have
in my career as a legislator is more distinct. Unlike other countries, as a member ... Show more
I think that mixing and hearing out ideas from the opposing side of my political party could help the
country. The organization of my political party can open to the autonomy to legislate for the party
members and create a system somewhat similar the Presidential System. While in the Russian
Federation there appears to be no equivalent to a backbencher since joining the party is difficult and
referral of an existing member would be necessary (Aguilar, Being a Party Member). I think that the
organization of my political party could begin with expanding the State of Duma to the ordinary
people and allowing opposition of ideas within the same party in order to improve the

Legislators Core Values
When the founding fathers crafted the Constitution I believe they intended it to be a starting point by
which we would build a successful and sustaining society. The core values that were and are
enshrined within the Constitution still exist. What has changed since its inception however, are the
types of issues and challenges the nation has faced, both then and now. This is not the first time,
Legislators or the Supreme Court has had to intervene on behalf of a specific portion of the
population in order to ensure that those core values could be applied to all not just equally, but,
equitably. It is not just the duty, but the responsibility of the elected officials to re–interpret a law
that would in some way violate the rights citizens.

From The Previous Paper, The Proposed Diabetes Policy...
From the previous paper, the proposed diabetes policy requires guidelines to be developed which
will promote adherence to diabetes management recommendations among diabetes people in the
United States. The advocacy campaign focuses on encouraging the American Diabetic Association
to create guidelines for endorsing adherence to the diabetes management recommendations and
develop legislation that will require the guidelines to be adopted by the health facilities dealing with
diabetic patients (WHO, 2016). Hence the law should make all the health care providers, patients,
health planner and all other employees adhere to those guidelines to improve the care of diabetes
patients. Establishing a legislation that needs health care to adopt the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Effect of the existing law to the proposed policy.
Non–adherence to medication is common in the US and is one of the main challenge public health
sector faces. Even though the challenge results in significant wastage of resources in the health
sector, there are no regulations in the US that address the issues (Knickman & Kovner, 2015).
Through estimation, half of the medications of chronic diseases are not taken as required. Non–
adherence to medication has also impacted the individual patients negatively. Thus, the effort being
taken to reduce the problem of chronic diseases such as HIV/AIDS, diabetes, cancer and heart
diseases remains a challenge due to non–adherence to medication.
Many resources in the health sector get wasted as their deployment do not to attain the intended
result. Although there are laws in the health sector, no legislation that gives the direction on how to
deal with non–adherence to the diabetes management recommendations, hence the proposed
diabetic policy will not be affected by the current law in the health sector. The diabetic policy will
only promote adherence to diabetes management recommendations for people with diabetes and
other chronic diseases. It will enhance the level of adherence to treatment in diabetes patients in the
United States.
Methods that will be used to influence legislators and policy makers. To enhance the success of
implementation of the policy, "three legs" of lobbying will be utilized including

Advantages Of Legislators
Members of the Texas State Legislature have a unique way of working for the people, they meet
with Texas House and Senate members and give their take on policies and laws. These legislators
are often exposed to lobbyists and interest groups that work for their own advantage. When a
legislator takes his term he/she is working for the public benefit and earns a very low income of
$7,200 per year, but it is quite obvious that this work is not done for the salary. On the other hand,
lobbyists get paid a very large amount in order to influence someone in the position of authority that
they were in at one point in time. Former lawmakers who become lobbyists right after their term as
legislators could benefit the public, but it could also bring up ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The highest priority of a government job is to help the citizens of that state. It sounds ideal, but there
are people who become lobbyists to give a voice the people who don't have one and there are others
who are in it for other factors. These factors can include money, and their familiarity with the bills
or policies. The monetary portion is quite simple, lobbying would earn more than $7,200 per year.
When it comes down to skills, being a legislator provides all the necessary tools in order to become
a lobbyist. A legislator knows the policy–making process, the knowledge of how these policies work
and most importantly they have relationships with other lawmakers. This could be very beneficial to
an interest group because the lobbyist would already be familiar with all the processes behind the

Analysis Of The Article ' Lost Of America ' By Douglas Mcgray
In his article "Lost in America," Douglas McGray highlights the issues of isolationism in the
American educational system. The article was issued by Foreign Policy magazine in 2006. Through
his article, McGray expresses his concerns about the lack of focus of the American educational
system on the learning of foreign cultures. McGray's target audience is people that can make
changes in the educational curriculum, which signifies that his intended audience includes American
legislators involved in American curriculum policies. McGray, who is co–creator and editor–in–
chief of Pop–Up Magazine, claims that Americans are neglecting a valuable resource that is
essential for the future generations' success in the competitive world market. In his article "Lost in
America," McGray uses anecdotes to build credibility and trust, uses hyperboles to surprise and
instigate fear, and motivates his audience with a call to action, to provide American legislators the
actual state of the American education and effectively persuade them to incorporate foreign culture
studies into the American educational curriculum.
McGray cleverly uses personal anecdotes to build reliability and present himself as a trustworthy
writer. Used at the beginning of the article, McGray's anecdote talks about the lack of geographical
knowledge of an American teenager. McGray shares, "Christina is a modern, multitasking,
American 15–years–old... Christina is puzzled. "The Philippines is an island?" she asks

Argument Essay 53: How To Be A Good Legislators
The main point in essay 53 was to be a good legislator you have to have upright intentions,sound
judgement, and knowledge about issues going on. Legislators have to know what's going on in their
state,but what's happening in others as well. It is also very important that legislators are up to date
with foreign affairs and foreign policies, however the House is not supposed to immediately engage
in negotiations and arrangements. In essay 56 the argument is against the House of Representatives
saying it's too small to understand the needs of the people. James Madison says the most important
topics they need to know is commerce,taxation, and the militia. Understanding these issues will lead
to the House making the best and most informed decisions. The number of congressmen doesn't
matter. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Oligarchy) The house has to respond with duty,gratitude,interest, and ambition for the great mass of
the American people. In the essay it said that satisfying and listening to needs can create a strong
bond between a government and their people. Essay 58 was about the number of members in the
House for each state. The smaller states were worried that their voices would not be heard and that
the larger states would have a bigger influence. (for better or for worse) The smaller states wanted to
put a limit on how many members from each state can join the House. That way every states can
have equal representation and no one is more powerful than one

Essay On Vote In Canadian Government
In Canadian government it best to have legislators who do not vote their own interests and they vote
the interests of their constituents. If legislators vote in their own interests they could be going
against their own parties or the constituents that voted them in. Even if they know a lot about the
subject they should still keep their interests out of their decisions and keep the interests of their
constituents. Legislators that vote their own interests might even be going against the party policies,
which could get them kicked out of the party or disciplined. Legislators are there to represent the
people of their riding, not to vote their own interests in. Legislators who vote their own interests
may have a deeper understanding or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I need to fight against things that i would actually want and fight for things that my party wants, like
the mandatory conscription i am against this but my party wants it so i have been helping fight for it.
Legislators also can be disciplined, some types of discipline are, denying them chances to travel,
forcing them to leave from the party, or, in some rare but extreme cases refusing to allow them to
run with the party's banner in the next election. It has been shown that "party discipline has
governed members' legislative voting for decades, defections from loyal party voting have occurred
in all legislative parties in democratic countries." (add citation!!!) the quote is talking how legislator
do sometime go against their parties but that knowing that they will be discipling them stops some
of legislators from going against their parties. Party policy are extremely import for legislators
follow. First of all they should not be in the party if they do not believe the party policies, and they
should be in a different party. Policies in parties are so there can not people fight in party for their
ideas. There also is the problem if the people who vote you in have really similar interests and that
make it easier to vote your intrest even if they bad as this quote explains, "representative interest
conflict which arises when Members share personal interests, for example in farming, fishing

Responsiveness In The House Of Representative
Responsive can simply mean answering, and in the case of congressmen the question one should ask
is whether they answer or reply to their constituent's inquiries. The question of whether
congressmen are responsive is important. Congressmen act as the representatives of diverse districts
and it is part of their duty to act on the interest of their constituents. Responsiveness should be a
factor that a district strongly considers when they re–elect a representative. A member of the House
of Representative must also display "a sense of identity" with his district, so that they "in turn, can
identify with him." They can portray their district's views by voting, sponsoring bills, or serving
committees that are relevant to their constituents. Nancy Pelosi is prime example of someone who is
admired and loved by her constituents, she has represented the 12th district for ... Show more
She has represented the 12th district for twenty–nine years. The committees she serves are relevant
to her district because San Francisco is an urban city with a majority of middle class and poor. She is
responsive to her constituents because she serves under the Better Deal committee. She
acknowledges that in order for San Francisco to prosper a better future is a necessity, therefore, the
Better deal committee strives to "[create] millions of good–paying, full–time jobs" and "Lower the
costs of living for families." She serves a diverse population of "44% white, 30% Asian, 15%
Latino, 5% Black" and knows that education is important for them to prosper. Nancy Pelosi serves
for the Education community and one of their priorities is to "[expand] access to affordable, high–
quality early learning opportunities." She cares about her constituent's success as well as the nation's
"increasing access to Head Start and Early Head Start for low–income families...will ensure our
nation's competitiveness in a global

The President's Role as Chief Legislator
The President as Chief Legislator
When a president is sworn into office, he or she takes on a multitude of titles. One of the many titles
the president is issued is the role of Chief in Legislator. This means that the president plays a crucial
part in the legislative process or lawmaking. This title holds much authority in the eyes of
Americans (Hoffman & Howard, 1317). Though this title does not give the president absolute
authority, it does grant him or her strong jurisdiction in the legislature. The framers of the
Constitution did not want America to be a monarchy the way they were when under the rule of
England. As a result, the framers purposefully outlined the president's limited power in the
constitution, creating a democratic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If the bill is vetoed, the president can then make changes to the bill that he or she sees necessary and
then send it back to congress for reassessment. The framers of the constitution created a legislative
process that required each branch to contribute to the legislative process. As a result, a vetoed bill
must go through congress and the legislative process again. The bill must also receive, at minimum,
two thirds votes from the House of Representatives and the Senate before it can become an official
law. Finally, if the president does not sign nor veto a bill for ten days, excluding Sundays, it will
automatically become a law. However, in certain circumstances, the president can use a pocket veto.
A pocket veto may only be used on a bill that is proposed within the last ten days of the presidency.
When a pocket veto is used, the president does not sign or veto the bill. Rather, after ten days of no
action, the bill is automatically rejected. As Chief in Legislature, the president, in a sense, has the
last word in the legislative process.
Another important power the Chief in Legislature has is the ability to assemble a meeting with the
House of Representatives, the Senate, or both. The framers specified this role of the president in in
Article II, Section 3. Not only is the president given the authority to call a meeting with congress, he
or she is expected to do so (Kesavan & Sidak, 9). In these meetings the president can discuss the
state of America, the status

Hidden Intellectualism Summary
"Hidden Intellectualism" discussed the many ways in which a student can be smart; and because of
their great influence on education, a duty to serve the people, and a disconnect from the classrooms,
this essay is extremely important to legislators. First, legislators have an enormous impact on
education. Legislators are the ones who decide what is taught in school and what standardized tests
are given – tests, as the essay explains, that may falsely label a student as unintelligent. Despite the
legislators' effects on education, they are often not aware of what goes on inside a classroom.
Therefore, while the legislators enforce programs to make students smarter, they themselves are
ignorant of what effects those programs may have. Next, the

Local Issues In Congress
In today's government, a major issue involves members of Congress focusing all of their time and
resources on re–election. This causes the Congress to focus on the desires and needs of their
constituents while potentially ignoring necessary projects and laws that could benefit the entire
nation. This, in effect, results in wasted funding and an inefficient Congress. I am a strong believer
that the members of Congress need to focus on the national issues rather than local issues that
dictate re–election. The state and local governments are in place to pass laws and ensure that the
local communities are being represented in a correct manner. Members of Congress focusing on
these local issues drives the "need" for pork–barreling. There are potential ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
These members of Congress are focused on spending federal funding on companies or people that
would result in benefiting themselves. The members of Congress that stay within the confines of
Congress for decades may be involved with corruption with no recourse for their actions. This is
because the incumbent party has an advantage over the rivaling party on the premise that they are
already in office. One of the main examples of this can be seen in the Keating Five in the late
1980's. Five senators, who were given donations by Charles Keating, "influenced a regulatory
agency on behalf of Keating's savings and loan institution, which was under investigation" (Otteson
1991). These senators were dealt no punishment, while two of the senators were actually re–elected.
This not only displays the potential corruption, but also shows how strong the incumbent party is
when facing elections. If term limits were enacted, these men would have not been able to be re–
elected and new senators could have taken their positions. . This ability for change in the members
of Congress can bring about new ideals and outlooks onto common issues that the country faces
today. In addition to the new ideals, the changing of Congress will allow for the constituents to
develop more of an interest in the government affairs. With new candidates, "people will be forced
to focus on

Monica Stonier: Legislator Case Study
Monica Stonier, State Representative for the 49th Legislative District in Vancouver, Washington is
an unusual politician. Why? Because her day job is teaching.
"My work in the classroom and with teachers keeps me at the heart of implementation, so I have a
way to craft policy that will be better implemented on the front end rather than on the back end," she
said, when interviewed this summer on how being a teacher impacts her role as a legislator.
Unfortunately, education policy and adherence to the McCleary decision was not all the
representative Rep. Stonier had hoped for since the capital budget failed to pass the State Senate.
Although K–12 has taken the brunt of the attention, when it comes to education policy, Washington
State University Vancouver students are still an enormous consideration for Stonier, who says
students who have been on the waiting list for aid grants are being given funding, though the new
budget and the "bipartisan effort to fund student need grant" was even higher than in the past. K–12
has taken the brunt of the education policy attention, but Washington State University Vancouver
students are still an enormous consideration for Stonier. She says students who have been on the
waiting list for aid grants are receiving funding, through the new budget and the "bipartisan effort to
fund student need grant" was even higher than in the past. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Rep. Stonier assured She confirmed that the "WSUV science building is high on the priority list for
capital budget" but it is unlikely that the budget would pass this

Becoming A Legislator
When i was younger my parents always teached me to help others when they need it , and the one
thing that i'm good at is speaking two languages , and with that i can help others communicate with
one another . And i'm also thankful to my parents for giving me the opportunity to learn as i was
developing instead of leaning as a teen because it would've been harder and a longer process. And
that'll be known as a translator , being a translator is incredible because it feels great to help other
and know that you have that ability to speak more than one language. And I'll be more than happy to
try to learn another language because that's going to help me have a better opportunity of receiving a
great job. I'm also hoping that I can travel around

Essay On Texas Legislature
The core function of the Texas Legislature is to formulate and enact laws. Apart from the enactment
of laws, the legislative body is also mandated with the functions of shaping the state's political
agenda, performing checks and balances on state of the state's government, pass the state's budget,
as well as oversee the functions of the administration. Similarly, the body also sets the critical details
or a court's organizational procedures when it comes to matters that pertain to impeachment and
court disputes regarding election petitions. It is equally important to mention that the body is also
mandated with the function of informing and educating the electorate regarding the critical functions
the body is required to deliver to the people as provided for by the laws of the State of Texas
(Dautrich and Yalof 684). The Texas Legislature conducts two main critical functions; formal and
informal. Formal functions involve the duty of formulating public policy and passage of the
legislation. In the process of law making, the legislators help to define the political path of the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The constitution mandates the legislators to hold biennial sessions; however, the governor also has
the constitutional power to call for special or emergency sessions. Accordingly, the constitution
empowers the legislators to amend the constitution, set policies, and also manage all state run
institutional affairs. As mentioned in the first question, the constitution empowers the legislators to
conduction processes such as legislative oversight and constituent functions, which are necessary
whenever it comes to the implementation of government policies and programs. In a nutshell, the
constitution of Texas simply provides a means for the legislators to follow the law especially when it
comes to performing critical functions of the

Legislators Role In Research
Lobbyists count with several ways to influence policymakers, from entertainment, gifts, dinners, and
trips. Another way of influence they have is by providing research information for legislators. Some
lobbyist work for interest group of enormous wealth, that are willing to aport in research,
entertainment, gifts, trips and even campaigns for legislators to benefit their proposal.
The revolving door is a term used for when a former legislator also works in another government
branch and vice versa. In some states, have enabled a cooling off period, that restricts a former
legislator from working as a lobbyist in the same government branch. Interesting enough, there are
loopholes in this restriction because there is no limitation to work in a different branch of the
government and then a legislator could go back and be employed in his previous branch. ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A Legislator job is only for 140 days every two years, having the opportunity to have extra income
to supplement their full–time jobs. After fulfilling the requisites, Texas legislators can enjoy of good
benefits when they retire. Taking advantage of their previous experience and profit from it after
retiring is dishonest. If a legislator wants to continue assisting the community, they most certainly
can volunteer; but profiting and taking advantage of their knowledge of the system and contacts
would be dishonest. Unfortunately, in Texas, the Population does not count yet with any law or
restrictions against lobbying for former

My Parent Legislator
Ever since I could speak English I have been my parent interpreter because my parent couldn't really
speak for themselves on account of them only spoke in broken English and understand a little of it. I
didn't choose to become a translator I just become their translator because I was the first one in my
house who could actually communicate in English in the house. It has become common Ever since
America has had immigrants, for their children to have been translating for their parent, but as a
result, it causes depends on their children from the time that they're young to when they're older. I
disliked my job as my parent interpreter because the hours were inconvenient, the duties were
stressful, and no appreciation. For the first three years of being in America my parent got around for
the most part because of how there was at least someone at the store or school who ... Show more
My parent would expect me to know like I knew every would in the English dictionary.
Overstretched with responsibility beyond their age, children can feel obligated, with those who
become translators reporting high levels of stress. It was stressful with the questions how they could
spell it and say things. Over the years of having to be my parent translator for them i have never felt
appreciated by them in any sort of way. Sometimes in life you want you to feel recognition specially
coming from parents. I would have liked to feel appreciated for the help over the years. All things
considered, my job being my parent translator is a job that i will probably always have. At the end of
the day they are my parent, I may not like all the inconveniences, stress and not being appreciated,
but i have to help them or else who will because I know for sure my sister wouldn't. it's great to
speak two languages for when meet

Is The Dependent Variable Womleg2010? Essay
In this paper I will argue that the dependent variable womleg2010, which is the percent of state
legislators that are women, is affected by a variety of variables in both positive and negative ways.
These variables include: state 's religiosity, gun laws, and a variable I merged into the state 's dataset
which is a state population's democratic share of the vote for president. I believe that higher levels
of religiosity will have a large negative impact on the number of women legislators in a state. I
hypothesize this is because states with higher levels of religiosity tend to also be more conservative
and therefore would have more patriarchal values which would go against seeing women as
legislators. I found in my data that religiosity did have a large negative impact on the number of
women legislators in different states. In a summary of the data, I found that for every 1 unit increase
of religiosity in state the number of women legislators would go down by –.06035, and since it has a
T value of –3.559 we can see the data is reliable. As for the Democratic share of the vote for
president variable I found it had a positive impact on the number of women legislators in a state. For
every one unit increase of this variable there was a .31286 increase of women legislators, and this
variable had a T value of 2.494 so I can use the data. I originally assumed that this variable would
have a positive impact on the number of women legislators in a state and I found that this

Vote Spotter App Pros And Cons
The Vote Spotter App is an application that allows people to find out about how their State level and
Federal level legislators voted on individual bills or topics. Once you vote, this application also
shows you how the majority of people with this same application has voted and if the legislator
voted with the majority or against them. The application also gives you ways to contact your
legislators, email or office number, and to follow them on several media outlets such as Facebook or
Twitter. These are just a few advantages for users to have with this application, but the legislators
themselves also have advantages with this application as well. One of the main factors of this
application that contributes an advantage for legislators ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are several ways the public's opinion can be influenced about Congress and their
performance. One of which is the general low repute garnered by politicians as a class (Logic pg.
269). With how often we hear about politicians having to do with scandals involving money, sex,
drugs, and general corruptions with the political deals they make, it's no wonder why politicians as a
whole have such a bad reputation. Looking at how the public views Congress on the graph, Figure
6–10 within "The Logic of American Politics", we can see that except right after the terrorist attacks
in late 2001 Congress on average has an approval rating well below fifty percent. Other factors that
influence the public opinion is how Congress decides on topics. One is where if parties compromise
then no one is fully satisfied with the legislation equaling average approval ratings or if neither side
agrees creating a stalemate then both sides are angry because of the political gridlock of the partisan
bickering (Logic pg. 269). This leaves little for politicians to be able to do to satisfy the public and
create a positive opinion towards Congress as a whole. As we can see with the Vote Spotter
Application the public is never unanimously on the same page so whatever decision the legislator
does make will decrease some of the public's opinion towards him. And with this application brings
one of the more visible influences that control the public's opinion about Congress and their
performance is the overall media. Whether being social media throughout the internet, news stations
or articles within newspapers the public has a vast amount of information at their fingertips about
Congress and how they are currently performing. While most of the information throughout the
media can be biased for whatever political party they are affiliated with, there are some

Capitol Day Essay
Capitol Day: A How–to Guide What is a capitol day? A capitol day is a planned event to connect
interior design advocates with their elected officials and their staff through meetings and awareness
events at the capitol on a particular day. Usually advocates meet with legislators and their staff;
however, sometimes advocates additionally meet with executive branch staff or agency staff. A
capitol day can also be called a lobby day, day on the hill, advocacy day or interior design day. It
doesn't matter what you call it, as long as everyone knows the objective – to raise awareness and
support favorable legislation. Interior design capitol days are primarily at state capitols since most
interior design legislation is introduced in state legislatures. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Use all the networks available to you to create as much buzz around the event as possible. However,
the best way to get individuals to participate is to ask them by phone or in person. Encourage board
members or advocates to ask colleagues, other IIDA members or other interior designers to attend. It
is much harder to say "no" to someone directly than it is to ignore an e–blast. If possible, issue a
press release to the newspaper in the capital city or to industry publications. Place an article or
column in the coalition's newsletter or website as well as partner organization's newsletters.
Additionally, IIDA HQ can share Facebook or Twitter posts from the Chapter about upcoming
capitol days. Key Points to consider when creating materials Let advocates know why their voice
matters as a constituent! Make it very clear to attendees that they're agreeing to meet and talk with
legislators at the state capitol. Provide tips and talking points to help them. When advocates register
for a capitol day, make sure the registration captures all the information you need to match
individuals with their legislators. Establish an early bird deadline, so it will be easier to schedule
meetings. STEPS TO ORGANIZING A CAPITOL

Marsilius Of Padu Practise Of The Pro-Imperial Historians
Marsilius of Padua continued the practise of the pro–imperial jurists, utilising the ideas of public
sovereignty in Roman law to support the claims of the emperors' universal power, particularly in his
work the Defensor pacis. Although at first anonymous, Marsilius' was discovered to be Defensor's
author in 1326, and so he fled Paris to the court of Ludwig of Bavaria in Nuremberg, where Ludwig
became his patron. Although not directly referenced in the text, it is believed by historians that the
conflict between Ludwig and Pope John XXII may have been the main influence of the Defensor. In
the treatise Marsilius argued that the purpose of the Defensor was to defend the power of the human
legislator against infringement by the papacy. Marsilius'

Mississippi State Legislator Case Study
Legislative Stance The Mississippi State Legislator along with the Governor are required to oversee
the laws of the State of Mississippi. All citizens entrust they are doing everything to protect their
well–being as it relates to the laws and regulations of the State of Mississippi. With so much
controversy, regarding the confederate flag, lawmakers from the Senate and the House committee
were asked to amend the laws. This caused misconceptions about the hanging of the flag, which led
to a division among the citizens of Mississippi. According to Dreher (2016), "There are 16 flag–
related bills before the House Rules Committee and three before the Senate Rule Committee. Some
bills ask for commissions to change the flag or for a new flag design while other bills ask the
Legislature to mandate that any public university, school or state agency fly the current state flag"
(Dreher, 2016, p.1). The State Legislator's presented all 19 Bills in the Mississippi Legislature 2016
Regular Session concerning changes of the Confederated Flag which all died. The House and Senate
presented these bills, which were originated from both the Democrat and the Republican Party. Each
Bill had to be presented in the Mississippi law process through committee hearings and debate
readings to see if they would become law. During this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Representative Philip Gunn was the first republican of the House who supported the change of the
Confederate flag. Some individuals did not agree to his proposal of the change and wanted to keep
the existing state flag (Atkin, 2016). Mississippi citizens voted to keep the Confederate flag but this
still caused some controversy among the people. In other states, the Confederate flag was banned in
national veteran's cemeteries and could only be displayed for Memorial Day and Confederates
Memorial Day because of the hatred it symbolized (Phillips,

Seven Roles of Chief Legislator: Barack Obama
Chief Legislator is supposed to be the highest position in the United States. Otherwise known as the
President of the United States of America, Barack Obama currently holds that position; however,
there is a lot of conflict between Obama and congress which is putting a damper on future plans to
help improve the country. The government is setup so there is equality within the system, Congress
and the President go hand and hand even though sometimes it might not work out the way it was
planned. Sometimes the outcome can all depend on the views of the President and Congress. Like
for instance now, Obama is a democrat and Congress is mainly Republicans so they have trouble
meeting eye to eye. Just some of the duties as Chief Legislator ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
xx–xx) His bills will then be passed through Congress and if they agree to his bill it is sent back to
the President for him to sign off on for it to become a law. However, not all bills are made through
the process he helps oversee Congress's decisions and helps advise them on their lawmaking ideas.
The sixth role is Leader of the Political Party, he must keep track of how people feel about his
policies and laws he carries out with. Obama is a democrat and will often help other democrats in
time of elections by endorsing their campaigns, he is also the leader of the entire Democrat
population as long as he is President so it is his duty to try to also satisfy Republicans, because they
often have different views on the way things should be done. Obama's last and final role is as Chief
Citizen this another role that is important because it's what shows to the public eye. As Chief Citizen
the President should be a role model who everyone can trust and look up to, he represents the
country as a whole but also makes us look good when it comes to other countries. He must realize
he sets the bar and the bar must be high, the President can't be selfish because he must think of
everyone. Conflict between Congress & Chief Legislator There has been a lot of acknowledgement
lately about the conflicts between Congress and President Obama. A lot of the problems has to do
with the fact

Legislator And Delegate Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Ashley Davis

More from Ashley Davis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Legislator And Delegate Analysis