summarizing the case #3 on facebook freedom of speech and giving additional source to support your answer Solution We will complete our review and update that the our User Operations team uses to evaluate reports of irreverence of our Community Standards around hate speech. To check that these guidelines reflect best practices, we will solicit feedback from legal experts and others, including representatives of the women\'s coalition and other groups that have historically faced recognition and understanding of the difference between one thing and another. A few months ago we began testing a new requirement that the creator of any content containing cruel and insensitive humor include his or her authentic identity for the content to remain on Facebook. As a result, if an individual decides to publicly share cruel and insensitive content, users can hold the author accountable and directly object to the content. the Anti-Defamation League’s Anti-Cyberhate working group and other international working groups that we currently work with on these issues to include representatives of the women’s coalition to identify how to balance considerations of free expression, to undertake research on the effect of online hate speech on the online experiences of members of groups that have historically faced discrimination in society, and to evaluate progress on our collective objectives. ..