QU:2 As of December 31, 20XX, Michael Corp's fixed assets before depreciation were $14,000,000. Its sales for the year were $32,000,000. Its EBIT for 20XX was $1,500,000, and its accumulated depreciation on fixed assets was $4,000,000. What was its fixed assets turnover ratio QU3: Between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, ROE at Bobcat Industries decreased even though sales increased. Using the DuPont Identity, explain what else could have happened to cause this QU:1 Which do you think provides a more valid measure of how a company is doing, comparison of current results with historical results or comparison of current results with the current results of another company Outcome Assessed          Determine employment laws that apply to the selection, development, and management of employees. Grading Rubric for Assignment # 2 - Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority Criteria 0 Unacceptable 20 Developing 30 Competent 40 Exemplary 1. What were the legal issues in this case? Did not complete the assignment or the legal issues were identified with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate. The legal issues were identified with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified. The legal issues were identified with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified. The legal issues were identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified. 2. Explain why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim fail? Did not complete the assignment or why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was explained with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate. Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified. Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified. Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified. 3. Explain why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeed? Did not complete the assignment or Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate. Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified. Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified. Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified. 4. Identify at least three things that the TVA should have done differently with regard to interviewing and selecting candidates for these jobs? Did not complete th ...

1. QU:2
As of December 31, 20XX, Michael Corp's fixed assets before
depreciation were $14,000,000. Its sales for the year were
$32,000,000. Its EBIT for 20XX was $1,500,000, and its
accumulated depreciation on fixed assets was $4,000,000. What
was its fixed assets turnover ratio
QU3:
Between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, ROE at
Bobcat Industries decreased even though sales increased. Using
the DuPont Identity, explain what else could have happened to
cause this
QU:1
Which do you think provides a more valid measure of how a
company is doing, comparison of current results with historical
results or comparison of current results with the current results
of another company
Outcome Assessed
Determine employment laws that apply to the selection,
development, and management of employees.
Grading Rubric for Assignment # 2 - Dunlap v. Tennessee
Valley Authority
Criteria
0
Unacceptable
20
Developing
30
Competent

2. 40
Exemplary
1. What were the legal issues in this case?
Did not complete the assignment or the legal issues were
identified with less than 70% accuracy and some information
was inappropriate.
The legal issues were identified with 70 to 79% accuracy and
some information was inappropriate or was not identified.
The legal issues were identified with 80 to 89% accuracy and
appropriate information was identified.
The legal issues were identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and
all appropriate information was identified.
2. Explain why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim
fail?
Did not complete the assignment or why the plaintiff’s disparate
(adverse) impact claim failed was explained with less than 70%
accuracy and some information was inappropriate.
Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was
explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was
inappropriate or was not identified.
Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was
explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information
was identified.
Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was
explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate
information was identified.
3. Explain why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim
succeed?
Did not complete the assignment or Why the plaintiff’s
disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with less
than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate.
Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was
explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was
inappropriate or was not identified.
Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was
explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information

3. was identified.
Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was
explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate
information was identified.
4. Identify at least three things that the TVA should have done
differently with regard to interviewing and selecting candidates
for these jobs?
Did not complete the assignment or did not identify any things
that the TVA should have done differently.
Only one thing that the TVA should have done differently is
identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate
information was identified.
Two things that the TVA should have done differently are
identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate
information was identified.
At least three things that the TVA should have done differently
are identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate
information was identified.
5. Clarity
Did not complete the assignment or explanations are unclear
and not organized.
(Major issues)
Explanations generally unclear and not well organized.
(Many issues)
Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues)
Explanations very clear and well organized.
(Added helpful details.)
6. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure,
spelling, punctuation, APA usage.
Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different
errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure,
spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Major issues)
Had 6 - 7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure,
paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Many

4. issues)
Had 4 - 5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure,
paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Minor
issues)
Had 0 - 3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure,
paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage.