The Usa Patriot Act And The Homeland Security Act

The Usa Patriot Act And The Homeland Security Act
September 11, 2001 is a date that will live on forever in American history, much like the date of
December 7, 1941. As President Franklin D. Roosevelt stated it is a date, which will live in infamy.
The fear and the need to protect the country and its citizens from future terrorist attacks resulted in
the U.S. Government to enact two different policies. The "Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorist Act (also known as the
USA PATRIOT Act) and the Homeland Security Act. Many individual feel that these two policies
have infringed the rights of the American people, while others believe that these infringements are a
necessity to ensure the safety of the people. This paper will explore if in fact these two policies are
unreasonably and unjustly infringing on the rights of the American People, and how it effect the
social justice system in America The USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law October 26, 2001, a
little more then a month after the horrific attacks of 9/11; the Homeland Security Act was signed
into law thirteen months later on November 25, 2002. The purpose of the USA PATRIOT ACT was
to create the process that the Government and its organizations uses to investigate terrorists that are
currently living within the Unites States borders and abroad. The Homeland Security Act was
created to consolidate over 20 different federal organizations into the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). This
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Where Do You Stand on the Usa Patriot Act?
Freedom in the United States has become increasingly constricted since 2001. Not only did the
terrorist attacks of September 11 have a drastic effect on the U.S. economy, but our nation 's
response has tested the limits of America 's core freedoms.
Congress passed the USA Patriot Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) in 2001 just weeks after the attacks, with the
intention of helping law enforcement act more effectively in investigating potential terrorists.
However, this act may do more harm than good. Some groups, such as the American Library
Association, state that the act infringes on Fourth Amendment rights guaranteed to us in the
Constitution. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They declare that the act is unconstitutional and will ultimately be decided so by the Supreme Court.
Many of those against the act cite ideas presented by George Orwell in his novel "1984"—mainly the
concept of "Big Brother." In the book, Orwell introduces the maladies of a totalitarian government
known as "Big Brother," by describing a negative utopia in which the government monitors and
regulates all aspects of life. The "Big Brother" concept elicits suspicion among all members of
society, and often leads to false accusations of crime and unlawful punishments. Opponents of the
act state that the mishandling of it could possibly lead to similar effects. Although the act may some
day expire as a result of its sunset clause, they argue that the act will provide a basis for future laws
that infringe on civil rights.
IN CONCLUSION
In order to resolve the issues associated with the USA Patriot Act, there are not many things that we
can do, as the bill was so quickly pushed through Congress. Nevertheless, a few allowances and
compromises on behalf of both parties could solve the controversy more quickly than the situation is
currently being handled. If the American people were simply to accept the USA Patriot Act for what
it was intended to be, a protective device, then some turmoil would disappear. The bill has already
passed through Congress and so it is quite difficult to change now. If the American public was to

The Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act
Despite being the superpower of the world, the United States of America does not enjoy any
exception from the global threats and challenges. The people in denial of such global threats finally
woke up to the reality on the dawn of September 11th, 2001, when terrorists struck American
financial hub in the city of New York. A badly shaken nation shocked by the magnitude of brutality
quickly assembled behind its president to pass a legislation, known as the USA Patriot Act, to tackle
internal and external threats to this nation on a war footing basis. The haste with which this
legislation was passed made it controversial almost immediately. No doubt, the intent was valid and
there was an absolute need to tackle threats to the homeland, however, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Many times in the past decade and a half since the Act was passed, there have been numerous
reports of suppression of the rights protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth amendments of the
Bill of Rights, directly threatening the freedom of association, information, speech, and the right to
legal representation as well as the right to liberty. This is simply unacceptable – what is the point of
having a law of the land if we create and ratify legislation that destroys that supreme law? For
instance, in clear violation of the Fourth amendment, the library surveillance introduced by the
Patriot Act allowed monitoring of library's public computer terminals and use of secret search
warrants to seize any tangible thing in a library without probable cause and court procedure. It also
imposed a gag order on booksellers and librarians to prevent them from disclosing details of
surveillance.()CITE The extent of surveillance in libraries is just another reason Americans need to
realize that their privacy rights have been snatched from them under the disguise of the Patriot Act.
It is important to realize that the surveillance does not stop at the district or township libraries. It has
reached our residential doorsteps without us realizing it. In this era of digital communication, most
people rely on technology to stay connected with the rest of the world. The Patriot Act allows
federal agents to monitor electronic communications, which includes wireless phones, email, and
internet, without much oversight. It also allowed the government to seize business records of
telecom companies as well as customer records from the Internet Service Providers.

Essay The USA Patriot Act and Civil Liberties
The USA Patriot Act and Civil Liberties
September 11, 2001 sparked many different feelings into the hearts of Americans. People sprang
into action to seek revenge and protect America's precious soils from another deadly attack by
reinforcing America's strength through her government. The men and women of Congress retaliated
to the terrorist attacks by drafting and passing the USA PATRIOT Act on October 26, 2001, which
stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to
Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism." The bill was moved through Congress with amazing speed and
little hesitation. After the passing, the unsuspecting citizens of America were bombarded with many
new rules and regulations that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, the ALA doesn't see how suppressing ideas makes America a democratic society, and fully
supports educating library staff to preach about user privacy (ALA). The ALA also feels strongly
when other privacy issues of the Act are brought forth. They argue that privacy is essential in the
promotion of an individual's seek of free speech, association, and thought without being scrutinized,
therefore they are prepared to educate as many as possible about the surveillance of library users
(ALA). "The USA PATRIOT Act and other recently enacted laws, regulations, and guidelines
increase the likelihood that the activities of library users, including their use of computers to browse
the Web or access e–mail, may be under government surveillance without their knowledge or
consent, so the ALA suggests to "urge all libraries to adopt and implement patron privacy and record
retention policies that affirm that "the collection of personally identifiable information should

The Usa Patriot Act : An Essential Step Against The...
The USA PATRIOT Act was a piece of legislation that was signed into law to address the realities of
modern terrorism. The new breed of terrorism was sophisticated and used new technologies that,
according to the President, "were not available at the time that the existing laws were written", he
said in his speech during the bill signing press event on October 26. 2001; a fair argument. He said
"The bill before me takes account of the new realities and dangers posed by modern terrorists" and
the Patriot Act was "an essential step in defeating terrorism while protecting the constitutional rights
of all Americans". But how does the Patriot Act do that? How does it protect the constitutional rights
of Americans? How does it help defeat ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
America the Brave and America the Free was now America the Mortal. Amidst the panic and outcry
for increased security efforts, October 26, 2001, President George W. Bush, signs H.R. 3162 into
law, the USA PATRIOT Act and the first jeopardy of American freedom in the modern war against
terrorism.
To understand why the Patriot Act is a threat to society and freedom, one must understand the
basics. First, the most powerful "Tool" under the Act is Title V or "Removing obstacles to
investigating terrorism". Under Title V, any Special Agent who is in charge of a bureau field office
of the FBI can issue a National Security Letter, or a demand for information by the FBI which
compels the recipient to release private data in relation to an individual who is only suspected of
terrorism; no confirmed relationship. NSLs have existed for some time and previously the power to
issue these demands were held only by the Director and Deputy Director of the FBI. Additionally,
under the Patriot Act, the scope of the NSLs power was made more broad, permitting all sorts of
private data to be gathered in secret, such as phone records, computer access records, credit history
and banking records. NSLs require no judicial review or probable cause and even contain a clause
which forbids the recipient from ever disclosing the letter's existence; a "gag order".
Second to Title V, is Title II or "Enhanced Surveillance Procedures", the name itself being very
revealing of

The Security Of The Usa Patriot Act Essay
Although the main concern of this case had to do with Computin and protecting national security,
Shelton can also technically be charged for possessing marijuana since it is illegal under federal law.
However, it is important to look at how the FBI kept surveillance on him and the questionable
manner in which they entered and searched his apartment. Shelton does have substantial grounds on
which he can move to suppress the evidence of marijuana against him; however, there is no
guarantee that he will be successful in court.
Firstly, he could look at the faulty affidavit used to get the "sneak–and–peek" warrant against him.
Since the warrant obtained to search his apartment were based on untrue grounds, he can claim that
the FBI had no right to enter his apartment under false pretenses. Moreover, he can also look at the
nature of "sneak–and–peek" warrants, which allows for the delayed notice of the execution of a
warrant under the USA Patriot Act that was implemented in light of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Was
the information that he was harboring so important that the FBI could use a false affidavit and delay
the notification of a warrant in order to search his home? If the answer is no, then Shelton has
grounds that the FBI should not have been able to search him in the first place. If the answer is yes,
then Shelton can also argue that the FBI had already gained information that they needed through
the handwritten notes between him and Holmgren. Under normal search

The United States Of The Usa Patriot Act
The attacks on the United States of America on September 11th, 2001 fundamentally changed the
way the government and its citizens viewed freedom and liberty. With the subsequent enactment of
the USA PATRIOT Act, security became the government's top priority. (The USA PATRIOT Act is
an acronym which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.) Congress, eager to put a law on the books to prevent
another attack, fast tracked the bill through both houses in six weeks. It passed by a near unanimous
vote, with the majority of dissent coming from Democrats. A highly contentious and debated law,
the USA PATRIOT Act infringes on Natural Law and the American citizen's Civil Liberties. Also it
violates the spirit and letter of the United States Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights. Many
amendments in the Constitution are at a direct contrast with the law's many broadly worded
sections, specifically the First Amendment's right to free speech and freedom of assembly, and the
Fourth Amendment's guard against unwarranted and illegal search and seizure. The founders of the
United States of America understood that certain rights were inalienable and endowed by the creator
or nature itself. They established a government of laws, not for the purpose of granting rights but
rather for protecting them. Only in America did the founders recognize this and understood if these
rights were not explicitly

Usa Patriot Act Essay
The USA PATRIOT Act was a law passed six weeks after September 11, 2001, which is in October
26, 2001, created by George W. Bush. USA PATRIOT Act is an acronym for "Uniting and
Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001". Which is ironic due to the disagreements about the act that can be described
as it is unconstitutional. Which are caused by the fact that the government is invading the people's
privacy by going through our phones, history of everything that is electronically, messages, phone
logs, etc. without having a legal contract by the government, and going against our natural
(unalienable) rights. It also violates the Bill of Rights, however, mostly on the first and fourth
amendment.
The first amendment is the prohibition of making any law respecting an establishment of religion,
impending the free exercise of religion, abridging freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of
the press, interfering with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the mains ones are that in section 215 describes how the government's ability is abusive
power due to that they expand their ability to look at records on anyone's activity that is being held
by third parties. Some of these includes doctors, libraries, bookstores, universities, and internet
providers, etc. are being forced to turn in records over to the FBI on their clients or customers which
makes it invading our privacy. Due to the fact that the sweeping powers given to the government to
conduct surveillance on the citizens which leads to the fact that there is less privacy protection than
before. The surveillance used now in days are electronic which can detect suspected terroists, but
that definition is weakened and easy to pass through enough for the government to create labels on
anyone as a suspected terrorist and to start gathering information on these people who are being

Essay on The USA Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act
The United States of America is a country that is based upon a principle of balancing the rights of an
individual, while still preserving public order. The U.S. Constitution (specifically the Bill of Rights)
guarantees every American certain Individual rights. Some of these rights include; freedom from
unreasonable search and seizures, a right to due process of law, and protection against cruel and
unusual punishment (The 4th, 5th and 8th Amendments). Historically the criminal justice system has
preserved these rights of peopled accused of crimes. However on September 11, 2001, the United
States became the victim of the largest terrorist attack the World has ever seen. According to
Schmalleger in 2003, that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(6) Any investigative or law enforcement officer, or attorney for the Government, who by any means
authorized by this chapter, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic
communication, or evidence derived there from, may disclose such contents to any other Federal
Law Enforcement , intelligence, protective, immigration, national defense, or national security
official to the extent that such contents include foreign intelligence information, to assist the official
who is to receive that information in the performance of his duties.? This allows for a better sharing
of information among the different division of federal, state and local law enforcement nationwide.
In a large scale criminal investigation, proper communication and information sharing is vital. This
act has allowed information to be disseminated to law enforcement agencies throughout the country,
so they can effectively work together towards the goal of arresting terrorists, and preventing another
terrorist attack. Another section of the USA PATRIOT ACT that Schmalleger (2003) quotes is Sec.
213. Authority for Delaying notice of the Execution of a Warrant. ?With respect to the issuance of
any warrant or court order under this section, or any other rule of law, to search for and seize any
property or material that constitutes evidence of a criminal offense in violation of the laws of the
United States, any notice required,

The Usa Patriot Act By John Walker
Nonetheless, the alarm of the terrorists ought not to make Americans surrender their lifestyle.
Americans ought not to be compelled to yield what our nation is glad for, including majority rules
system and opportunity of representation. On account of the University of California San Diego
(UCSD) organization banning the connection to the terrorist site, the USA Patriot Act was translated
mistakenly. Their choice to boycott the hyperlink was an infringement of the right to speak freely. A
connection to a site ought not to be seen as correspondences gear.
Americans, clearly, have a privilege to be worried about terrorists. In sympathy toward the
Americans ' own wellbeing, the USA Patriot Act was passed with great reason. It ought to stay ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then again, the UCSD understudies pay for the right to gain entrance, accordingly providing for
them their own particular rights to the right to gain entrance and how they utilize it. In the event that
the colleges were giving the server access to the understudies free of charge, then it would be an
alternate story. Yet, since the understudies are paying for the right to gain entrance, they get rights
through the exchange. Case in point, the vast majority would concur that the college would not be
permitted to preclude understudies from connecting to a site which condemned the college. In spite
of the fact that, if UCSD contended that they claim the server and they can confine their clients
however they see fit, how is this contention not the same as the case close by?
The Americans ' dread of terrorists ought not to make them surrender what their nation is about. The
United States is about vote based system and opportunity of articulation. There is no compelling
reason to yield flexibility of statement with a specific end goal to stop the terrorism. Regardless of
the fact that the terrorism is decreased on the grounds that individuals were eager to surrender their
own particular rights, then the US will wind up with an alternate real issue which could adversely
influence the nation considerably more. That issue would be that the flexibility of declaration would
be significantly more confined. In the event that higher

The Pros And Cons Of The USA PATRIOT Act
At approximately 8:46 a.m. on September 11, 2001, an American Airlines jet slammed into the
North Tower of the World Trade Center, initializing a day of tragedy, sorrow, and despair. Truly, the
events of September 11, 2001, indefinitely changed the United States of America. Nearly one month
following the attacks, with a nation still in distress, then President George W. Bush signed the USA
PATRIOT Act into law on October 26, 2001, in accordance with information released by the United
States Congress (United States Congress, 2017). Serving as an abbreviation for Uniting and
Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism, or USA PATRIOT, the Act of Congress provides additional resources and tools to
government agencies or officials, in order to detect or prevent potential acts of terrorism, given
information released by the United States Congress (United States Congress, 2017). Nonetheless,
while the heightened powers granted to specific government agencies are used to proactively
prevent acts of terrorism, the enacted USA PATRIOT Act continues to spark several constitutional
concerns. With numerous advantages and disadvantages, the USA PATRIOT Act has certainly aided
in the national fight against terrorism, but has also generated several constitutional issues. Perhaps
the streamlined ability to identify potential terrorists or acts of terror is one of the most notable
advantages of the USA PATRIOT Act. When introduced in

USA Patriot Act Literature Review
The use of intelligence gathering efforts of the United States in clandestine operations incognito
with significant levels of deception is often rarely open to the American public. The intelligence
agencies' empowerment by the Federal government continues their surveillance methods and
information gathering techniques often without interference in the name of national security. Since
the release of the intelligence gathering methodologies by the National Security analyst Edward
Snowden, there has been a significant amount of public scrutiny regarding intelligence operations
and concise scholarly research clarifying its controversial approaches. The circumstances that
surround the implementation of the USA PATRIOT Act continues to center on the inability of the
U.S. government to balance the legal authority of the USA PATRIOT Act with that of the right of the
American public to privacy as the constitution affords. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Constitution to include personal civil liberties about information gathering intelligence operations.
The purpose of this literature review provides a historical overview of operational intelligence
activities through researching information–gathering efforts before the implementation of the USA
PATRIOT Act. Additionally, the analysis will inquire into their legitimacy or misrepresentation
regarding the constitutionality of application as well as a review of modifications to information
collection programs after USA PATRIOT Act implementation and impacts on intelligence collection
operations. Lastly, the inquiry will examine the USA PATRIOT Act revisions ramifications
regarding civil liberties, and the impact of the

Essay on Right to Privacy
Absolute Power The right to privacy means controlling your own personal information and the
ability to allow or deny access to others. As Americans, we feel it's a right not a privilege to have
privacy. IT technology and the events of September 11, 2001 are diminishing that right, whether its
workplace privacy or personal privacy. From sending email, applying for a job, or even using the
telephone, Americans right to privacy is in danger. Personal and professional information is being
stored, link, transferred, shared, and even sold without your permission or knowledge. IT technology
has benefited mankind tremendously in so many areas, but its also comes with a price.
Advancements in technology make all individuals vulnerable to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The USA PATRIOT Act has similarities to the McCarthy Red Scare era and J. Edgar Hoover's reign
as FBI director. After September 11th, the United States was still in shock over the terrorist attacks.
It's completely understandable that Congress wanted to pass a bill to protect the welfare of the
country; but how the bill was passed with very little congressional debate shows the lack of
judgment used to realize the ramifications the act may cause in the future. The USA PATRIOT Act
infringes on every Americans fundamental right to privacy. The Bush Administration submitted
lawmaking proposals after the terrorist attacks. Congress was given one week by Attorney John
Ashcroft to pass the bill without changes. Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy (VT) convinced the
Justice Department to agree to some changes; but Attorney General Ashcroft warned if the bill was
not passed immediately and if changes were made Congress would be blamed for future terrorist
attacks. The bill passed without major changes or debate. The Act was signed into law on October
26, 2001. However, the proposal was not passed unanimously. One lone Senator named Russ
Feingold (D–WI) was the only senate member to object to the bill and voiced his concerns. Feingold
states that: The Administration's proposed bill contained vast new powers for law enforcement,
some drafted in haste and others that came from the FBI's wish list that

The USA Patriot Act Analysis
The coordinated terrorist attacks of September 11th attempted to shake the foundation of American
democracy and changed how Americans viewed terrorism. No longer was terrorism an issue of
distant countries, the aftermath of the terrorist attacks left the American people searching for
answers to prevent another attack on the homeland. Signed into law less than six weeks after the
September 11th attacks, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT Act) of 2001 sent a strong
message to American citizens and the rest of the world that the United States government was
prepared to amend laws in order to combat both foreign and domestic terrorism and ensure public
safety.
Problem
The hastiness of its inception caused the USA PATRIOT Act to be deemed unconstitutional by the
public court of opinion. Many citizens feared it was a knee jerk reaction to an attack that came
without warning. However, the USA PATRIOT Act is constitutional and an effective counter–
terrorism ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Michael McCarthy argues the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 provided a comprehensive approach to a
new threat on the United States. Passed with overwhelming support, "the haste was considered
essential by law enforcement officials seeking to prevent further attacks feared to be imminent"
(McCarthy, 2002). In analyzing the key aspects of the USA PATRIOT Act, McCarthy states the Act
provides a balance between the strengthening of the executive branch and the necessary checks and
balances of the legislative and judicial branches. These checks and balances help to protect
individual rights while ensuring national security. One of the most important checks was placing a
sunset timeframe of four years on key powers dealing with executive discretion. In doing so, the
legislative and judicial branches ensured continued oversight over the Act and protection from abuse
of power from the executive

Questions On The Usa Patriots Act
Question 1 According to the USA patriots act, the practice of detaining aliens that are close
associates with terrorism is not a good idea. The decision by the court can be said not to be the best
because it included even people who are close to the groups that practise these heinous activities.
The criteria for deportation and detention that covers the plotters or the actual implementers of the
terrorist act and the other people that are related or are close affiliated with the groups linked to
these individuals go against the rights and freedoms of individuals. The action is against the human
rights because all individuals have a right not to detention without trial. Detaining people is against
their right to liberty, and it must ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The law should be rational to include and look for ways of accommodating such cases. Question 2
Establishment of strong and efficient defensive measures influences the selection of sites to target
by the terrorists. Good defense also enables terrorists to craft other method new methods to attack
their targets, but it does not totally prevent the terrorists from committing their terror attacks.
Terrorists are groups that wage war against the weak points of the society, and they are never out to
fight but to cause destruction. Terrorists attack the innocent people as a way of articulating their
ideology and communicating to the government. Realization of security beep sets terror to a less
secure place where they lodge their attacks. However, security effectiveness does not prevent
terrorists from committing their terror attacks. Most of the people members of these groups are even
ready to die, and they will use any method to cause destruction. Some will even swallow bombs and
go to public places where a lot of people gather (Kamien G. D, 2006). The terrorist also comes up
with other methods of administering their wrath when they realize that the security is tight. These
methods include the use of weapons that can easily get ported without causing much attention like
guns instead of bombs and also recruiting members of the target country to their group. With the
innovations, the terrorists can commit to series of attacks on

Impact of the Usa Patriot Act
Abstract
The primary concern of this paper is to establish the impact of the USA Patriot Act on local law
enforcement and its potential for net widening. This paper will cover three primary areas to provide
a proper public safety case analysis. First the paper will describe the public safety agency and its
roles in relation to the USA PATRIOT ACT. Then the paper will provide a detail explanation of the
leadership, management, and administration roles of the public safety agency chosen. Finally this
paper will cover the importance of efficient administration in public safety.
Impact of the USA Patriot Act
The primary concern of this paper is to establish the impact of the USA Patriot Act on local law
enforcement and its potential for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Take for example (Scheidegger, 2001) "The new section requires the Attorney General to take into
custody any alien certified to be inadmissible or deportable on one of six grounds" This is passed on
to law enforcement officer to enforce on initial contacts from the community. This allows law
enforcement officials to contact Immigration and Naturalization to establish history on the contacted
party. When it comes to the criminal justice process of the United States we should look at the law
enforcement agencies as the most dynamic component of the organization. The organization is
required to guarantee safety; the USA Patriot Act has amplified the effectiveness of the criminal
justice process by authorizing law enforcement additional tools for the job. The USA Patriot Act has
also increased the abilities of other essential mechanisms in the criminal justice process by making
their processes easier to execute. If we compare the changes we can use the example of discretion.
Discretion allows members in the law enforcement area to act freely to decide what should be done
in any given situation.
Leadership, Management, and Administrative Roles Many roles are involved the leadership,
management, and administration of a law enforcement agency. The greatest role across all parts of
these individuals is to uphold the law using discretion while being firm and fair to everyone in

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001: Need for National Security...
In a post–September 11th America, it is not uncommon for the mentioning of the word "terrorist" to
spark any number of emotions in its citizens. In response to activities such as the attacks on the
World Trade Center, Pentagon, as well as the 2001 anthrax scares, Congress proposed the USA
PATRIOT Act. Supporters of the Act cite the importance and immeasurable need for greater
protection in terms of national security, which is the government's responsibility first and foremost
to protect its citizens from enemies foreign and domestic. However, for every proponent there is an
equally passionate opponent who partially believe not only does the Act impede on civil liberties
and individual rights but was an opportunistic ploy to grant excess ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The following paragraphs delve into a brief synopsis of controversial issues surrounding the USA
PATRIOT Act. The issue of surveillance practices has been a cause of concern since the Acts
establishment. Title II of the act entitled "Enhanced Surveillance Procedures" which encompasses
Section 201 through Section 225 (USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, 2001) is devoted specifically to
outlining expanded government powers. Since 2001 certain controversial statutes were removed or
changed such as the "requirement that the government prove a surveillance target under FISA is a
non–U.S. citizen and agent of a foreign power" (Justice). It is stated in several resources that part of
the initial discourse of surveillance powers was due to a general misunderstanding in the meaning.
The surveillance portion of the USA PATRIOT Act seemingly provided additional government
power in situations crucial to national security; it allowed for techniques to find, track, and gather
information on suspected terrorists and terrorist activity especially on U.S. soil. Also expanded upon
were wiretapping abilities of agencies to trail extremist activity without alerting them to the
interference. The two provisions stated, while very general in description, provide grounds for an
immense sense of security. Government and law enforcement agencies had a greater expanse of
power in recognizing, identifying, tracking, and possibly preventing future incidents of threat

Usa Patriot Act Essay
USA Patriot Act of 2001
In 2001, George W. Bush signed a law to provided tools to catch and prevent terrorism. It was called
the USA Patriot Act of 2001. It was George W. Bush's response to the terrorist attack that took place
in September 11, 2001 in New York and Pentagon. The Law ensured security and safety for the
citizens but it also violated individual right. The law took a lot of criticism because it violated
constitutional right, and it created problems between individual right perspective and the public
order advocates.
In September 11, 2001 United States witnessed one of the worst attack that took place in New York
and Pentagon. A lot of people died that day. And on October 26, 2001 George W. Bush singed the
USA Patriot Act it was anti–terrorism law. The USA Patriot Act gave new powers to the Justice
Department. Even if the law assured us the safety, it also violated the Bills of Rights. The purpose of
the Bills of Right is to protect every individual from being violated. The USA Patriot Act of 2001
violated fourth amendment. "Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and
seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all
searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law"
(http://www.uscourts.gov/about–federal–courts/educational–resources/about–educational–
outreach/activity–resources/what–does–0). Means that government cannot search without any
warrant. And the government

The USA Patriot Act (FISA)
In the entire span of the United States history, the commitment of the protection of Americans civil
liberties have frequently been tested and strained. The biggest breach of national security was on
September 11, 2001 which ended in the compromise of the trust of American people because they
had felt lied to and vulnerable all because of a broken pact and a failure to protect America with an
agency founded to prevent such a catastrophe. After these acts of terror Congress felt they needed to
do better and step up their game, they decided it was time to act so just one vote short of unanimous
bipartisan support, they passed the USA Patriot Act. The measure gave law enforcement officials
sweeping new powers to conduct searches without warrants, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Although the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) already permitted the
administration to wiretap on an emergency basis and apply for warrants retroactively, the
administration maintained that FISA was too cumbersome when urgent issues of national security
were at stake. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales offered two justifications for the legality of the
domestic spying program, asserting that the president had the "inherent authority under the
Constitution, as commander in chief, to engage in this kind of activity" and that Congress, "when it
authorize[d] the president to use all necessary and appropriate force" against al–Qaeda in 2001,
indirectly sanctioned it. Critics objected that the wiretapping infringed on civil liberties, sidestepped
the legislative branch, and placed the president above the law. In August 2006, a federal judge in
Detroit ruled the wiretapping program unconstitutional. However, in July 2008, Congress passed a
bill overhauling the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act–effectively legalizing Bush's secret
program. The new law gave legal immunity to the telephone companies that participated in the NSA
secret wiretapping program after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and broadened the
government's ability to eavesdrop on those in the U.S. and abroad it suspects are linked to terrorist

The Act Of 2001 ( Usa Patriot Act, Or Usapa )
After the 2001 September 11th attacks on the world trade center the nations homeland security
policies had to be reinforced. The awkwardly titled so as to unite and Strengthening America
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA
PATRIOT Act, or USAPA) presented a plenty of administrative changes which altogether expanded
the reconnaissance and investigative forces of law authorization organizations in the United States.
The Act did not, in any case, accommodate the arrangement of balanced governance that generally
protects common freedoms despite such enactment. Authoritative recommendations in light of the
terrorist assaults of September 11, 2001 were presented not exactly a week after the assaults.
President Bush marked the last bill, the USA PATRIOT Act, into law on October 26, 2001. Despite
the fact that the Act made critical corrections to more than 15 imperative statutes, it was presented
with awesome flurry and went with little verbal confrontation, and without a House, Senate, or
meeting report. Therefore, it needs foundation authoritative history that regularly reflectively gives
important statutory understanding. The Act was a trade off form of the Anti–Terrorism Act of 2001
(ATA), an expansive authoritative bundle planned to fortify the country 's protection against
terrorism. The ATA contained a few procurements incomprehensibly growing the power of law
authorization and knowledge organizations to screen private

USA Patriot Act Analysis
The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center was the single most devastating terrorist attack in this
country and, indeed, the world, with more than 3,000 deaths. (Pollock, 2014, p.403). The terrorist
attack on September 11th, 2001 was a wakeup call for local law enforcement and the United States.
This resulted in an increase of law enforcement officials and change of missions for local law
enforcement, federal law enforcement; the creation of the Department of Homeland Security(DHS).
The Congressional Act from this attack was the signing of the United States of America Patriot Act
into law October 26, 2001. The USA Patriot Act "gives federal officials greater authority to track
and intercept communications, both for law enforcement and

Usa Patriot Act Pros And Cons
USA Patriot Act Terrorism in the world is getting worse by the day, we keep getting more threats to
our country. Finally our leaders found an act that allows more security for our country. This act
helps us control terrorism in our country. The USA Patriot Act involves the war on terrorism and the
threats they make against us. With this act, law enforcement can search houses and any place that is
suspected of terrorist acts. On September 11, 2001 our country had our first big terrorist attack on
the world trade centers. After this attack our congress passed the act to ensure a safer country. The
federal officials and authorities are allowed more freedom of tools and of intercepting terrorists act.
"The FBI could get a wiretap to investigate

Introduction of the USA Patriot Act
1. Introduction The USA Patriot Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) of 2001 was issued on October 26, 2001, by
President George W. Bush, with the purpose of providing a response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
The act was intended to reform the agenda regarding law enforcement agencies and their limitations.
The authorities acknowledged that it was essential for law enforcement investigatory tools needed
significant improvement and thus revised their activities. The Patriot Act is meant both to deter and
to prevent terrorist acts in the US and across the world.
The 9/11 World Trade Center Terrorist attacks generated much controversy both when regarding the
fact that the government was caught by surprise and when regarding the length that terrorists are
willing to go in order to achieve their goals. Americans were horrified and panicked as a
consequence of the 9/11 events and because of the 2001 anthrax attacks. Congress thus needed to act
rapidly and effectively by introducing a series of strategies meant to reinforce security both on a
local and on a global level. "The Patriot Act provided more time for investigators to question the
suspects before they had to be charged or let go" (Marcovitz 8).
2. Anecdotal evidence Although it seemed like the right thing to do in the given circumstances, the
act also triggered debates among civil libertarians and persons who believed that the government

The Importance of the USA Patriot Act Essay
The Importance of the USA Patriot Act
The United States government changed the face of computer and internet use when it signed the
USA Patriot Act on October 26, 2001. This act was created in the wake of the terrorist attacks in
New York City on September 11 that same year. Many people believe that this act is a good thing
and will help in defense against any future attacks. What most people do not know, however, is the
effect of this act on the more general public. This includes individual people, public libraries,
colleges and universities, and even trucking or hauling companies.
The basis of the USA Patriot Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
Tools Required to Intercept ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Agencies previously used subpoenas to obtain these records. The problem with this was that there
was a court process that had to be gone through before records could be obtained. Now, the agencies
only need to obtain a search warrant for this, greatly speeding up their process.
The USAPA provides agencies the ability to ask for student records in concurrence with a terrorism
investigation. This was previously protected by Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. These
agencies must, however, receive a court order from a Federal District court. The United States
Immigration and Naturalization Service is given quite extensive powers concerning foreign students.
The school is required to keep visa information on these students and update any changes to these
visas. Science programs have much more requirements than other areas. Scientists must have
thorough background checks before they can obtain materials from the newly–expanded toxin list
that the government keeps. Also, convicted felons, people dishonorably discharged from the
military, illegal aliens, and people convicted of using illicit drugs are not allowed to use these
documented materials.
Most instances concerning trucking or hauling companies comes in the form of the information kept
about their drivers. Extremely thorough background checks are required for drivers of trucks
carrying hazardous waste materials. The main part

USA Patriot Act Essay
Technology has affected the field of justice studies in many ways. After the events of September
11th 2001, technology has had an even greater impact on the field of justice studies. Rapidly
advancing technology has made surveillance cheaper and easier to conceal. Tools such as
wiretapping, surveillance for e–mails, and other forms of surveillance tools that were before a
violation of peoples' right to privacy, are now allowed to be used without probable cause. These
tools now allow the FBI to find terrorists before they commit their act of violence. These
surveillance tools that are now allowed to be used by the FBI were passed under the USA Patriot
Act. Given that the USA Patriot Act now allows the FBI to look through what many ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
If you violate a local law––we will hope that you will, and work to make sure that you are put in jail
and be kept in custody as long as possible." According to Anne Kandra, whether a person is in favor
or against the USA Patriot Act, it is important to know how this Act will affect our life online. The
act allows investigators to use more powerful tools to monitor phone calls, e–mail messages, and
web surfing. People now have less guarantee of privacy on the Internet. The federal investigators
will now look through everyone's e–mail, text chat, or search inquiry. The surveillance will focus on
people who authorities have a solid basis of suspicion. They will have to establish probable that a
targeted person has been involved in a crime. The judges will then approve all reasonable requests
related to criminal investigations. This Act also allows federal investigators to wiretap suspect's
phones. Before, federal investigators had to have probable cause and had to specify specific lines to
monitor. Now, they are able to wiretap without probable cause. They can monitor everything on a
line whether the suspect is using it or not.
Additionally, the USA Patriot Act is important to the field of justice studies because according to
Professor Henderson, a professor at Arizona State University, "...it has given scholars in the field
some fertile new ground for research. I'm sure legal scholars are working on some of the possible

The United States of America faces a changed world altogether. World war 2 had changed Germany
and Japan quite a bit, France and Great Britain even had great losses.
The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W.
Bush on October 26, 2001. Its title is a ten–letter backronym that stands for "Uniting and
Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001".
On May 26, 2011, President Barack Obama signed the PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011, a
four–year extension of three key provisions in the USA PATRIOT Act: roving wiretaps, searches of
business records, and conducting surveillance of "lone wolves"–certain people suspected of
terrorist–related ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The USSR centralize its oversight over the states of the Eastern Bloc, while the United States set up
a plan of global containment to dare the Soviet power, spreading military and financial aid to the
countries of Western Europe and building the NATO alliance. The Berlin Blockade was the first big
disaster of the Cold War. With defeating of the communist side in the Chinese Civil War and the
outbreak of the Korean War, the battle unfold. The USSR and USA scrambled for pressure in Latin
America, and the separating of colonies states of Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia. At the
time, the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 was stopped by the

The United States Of The Patriot Act
The United States of America is undoubtedly one of the world's largest and most powerful nations.
However, it has been facing the problem of terrorism for many decades, most notably after the tragic
events of September 11th. The Patriot Act was passed shortly after these events in response to the
acts of terrorism witnessed by the whole nation. At the time, it seemed rational and logical to allow
this bill to pass, due to the extreme anger of American citizens, and the willingness to fight against
terrorism. However, certain breaches of privacy came with the introduction of the Patriot Act. We as
Americans want to feel protected from the threats of terrorism, however, we are not willing to give
up certain privacies and liberties in order for that to happen, even when put to a vote.
According to the Constitution Rights Foundation, "On October 26, President George W. Bush signed
the Patriot Act into law. He praised the 'new tools to fight the present danger . . . a threat like no
other our Nation has ever faced.' He also asserted that the Patriot Act 'upholds and respects the civil
liberties guaranteed by our Constitution'" (The Patriot Act). Supporters of the Patriot Act will argue
that ever since it was passed, it has helped prevent future terrorist attacks. They have also argued
that the secrecy behind the Patriot Act helps to keep the terrorist organizations from knowing vital
information that would be valuable to them. This is a valid point; as well trained terrorists

The USA Patriot Act
By: Josh Rozdolsky
United States History
Saleh
July 20th, 2016
The USA PATRIOT is an acronym for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing
Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism" (the USA Patriot Act). It was made
to provide the United States government with certain tools and weapons to fight against terrorism
around the globe. The USA Patriot Act violates American civil liberties and is unconstitutional by
restricting the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights. This act violates
freedom of religion and speech. It violates the right to no search and seizure without proper warrants
or probable cause. The USA Patriot Act is unconstitutional and violates American ... Show more
There are over 370 of these words that will flag an ordinary American citizen to be searched.
Imagine how many people search these words on a day to day basis. This is why the Patriot Act does
not help fight terrorism but rather loads government agencies with useless data and threatens
Americans right to freedom of speech: "The Patriot Act's provisions are really a grab bag of
governmental powers that have been sought over the years preceding September 11th, 2001 and
rejected as antithetical to civil liberties" (Maag). History showed us previously to the Patriot Act that
sometimes Americans realize some legislation in the United States government needs to be
rechecked, revised, or revoked. "History has taught us that repressive laws adopted in previous times
of crisis (like the Alien and Sedition Act of seventeen ninety eight; restrictions on free speech, and
the notorious "Palmer Raids" during WWI; the internment of Japanese–Americans during WWII;
blacklists and domestic spying during and after the Cold War/McCarthy era) were eventually
recognized as unnecessary at best, and dangerous" (The Patriot Act Is Not a Good Antiterrorism
Tool). History tends to repeat itself and the Patriot Act is a good example. The Patriot Act violates
the First Amendment by taking away American rights to freedom of

The Importance Of The Usa Patriot Act
The Patriot Act of 2001 was originally intended to protect citizens against further terrorism after the
September 11 attacks. It was passed due to the overwhelming amount of support for the federal
government from the public. This act made it easier for the government to attack the funding
networks upon which terrorist organizations depended upon. The Patriot Act also encouraged
various intelligence–gathering agencies, such as the CIA, and law–enforcement groups, like the FBI,
to share information about suspected terrorists. Although some may argue that the Usa Patriot Act
was beneficial in protecting the United States against further terrorism, the Usa Patriot Act was and
still is, a restraint on constitutional rights. This act violates the Fourth Amendment, infringes on the
First Amendment, and has been used by the federal government to abuse their power.
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution asserts that all citizens will be protected from unlawful
searches and seizures. The United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), infringes on this amendment of
the Constitution. On April 5, 2004, Bob Barr, a former Republican member of Congress, spoke out
against the PATRIOT ACT in his speech. In the Washington Post, Barr stated that, "'The Fourth
Amendment is a nuisance to the administration, but the amendment protects citizens and legal
immigrants from the government's monitoring them whenever it

The Fight Against Terrorism: The USA Patriot Act
The USA PATRIOT Act was ratified into law in October 2001 in response to the devastating terror
attacks on America on September 11, 2001. Subsequently, President George W. Bush's government
increased their focus on the fight against terrorism. The acronym "USA PATRIOT" stands for,
"Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and
Obstruct Terrorism" (Doyle, 2001). This law is vitally important to America and plays a crucial role
in the prevention of terrorism while imposing relatively minimal peril to the various civil liberties.
In order to combat terrorism, the United States of America needs this law because it allows
counterterrorism agents to utilize a variety of different weapons that have been

The USA Patriot Act: Invasion Of Privacy
Would you give up your privacy for a little bit of security? The two go hand in hand. Our advancing
technology provides our government with the tools to fulfill its top priority–national security. But
where is the line drawn between security and privacy? Privacy is not only a value to many
Americans–it is a right protected under the Fourth Amendment. But to what extent? The technology
meant to protect us seems to be invading the little privacy we have left, having diminished greatly
over the years. It has been said, "Give me liberty or give me death!" Since 9/11, security in our daily
lives has been a concern for many Americans and the government has since made efforts to secure
the nation. The measures taken to protect our nation through the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Airports have recently utilized Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT), which has since raised
concerns for privacy and whether or not it breaches the Fourth Amendment. AIT or full body
scanners, use electromagnetic wavelengths to see beneath your clothes, producing an image of your
naked body for the TSA (Taylor, 2013, p.513). From there, they can see anything you may be
carrying (Taylor, 2013, p.513). Jeffrey Rosen states, "The designers of the body scanners at Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory offered US Officials a choice between these naked machines or blob
machines" (Rosen, 2010, p.9). The blob machines are less invasive, portraying your body as a "non–
humiliating blob" in the words of Rosen. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security eventually
deployed the naked body scanners without public opinion (Rosen, 2010, p.9). Although the intention
of these machines seems to be good when it concerns the safety of travelers, these invasive
procedures have led to incidents of misuse and can be humiliating for many. An incident in a
Nigerian Airport occurred where airport officers used full–body scans as a form of pornography
(Taylor, 2013, p.514). In another, US Marshalls in Florida illegally saved 35,000 images of full–
body scans on one scanner (Taylor, 2013, p.514 ). To make matters worse, these images were
plastered on the internet (Taylor, 2013,

Usa Patriot Act
After the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, a controversial piece of legislation
was adopted and passed called the U.S.A. Patriot Act. The title for this bill is an acronym for "the
United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and
Obstruct Terrorism Act" (USA Patriot Act).
In the years since the passing of the Patriot Act, there has been much controversy and debate
regarding the positive and negative advantages, and consequences of this bill. As a member of the
law enforcement community I have experienced firsthand some of the changes the Patriot Act has
brought upon this nation. A result of this experience along with information obtained in the studying
of this act and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Constitution. Along with this expansion of surveillance powers is the "sneak and peek provision"
(The USA–PATRIOT Act and the American response to terror; panel discussion, 2002). During a
discussion panel in 2002, David E. Suchar discussed this provision stating the "sneak and peek
provision, which allows the government to conduct secret searches of anyone, including citizens,
without notifying the person that they have a search warrant and that the search is authorized".
Suchar further stated this provision is "a very broad standard that probably could be met in a
tremendous number of cases and not limited to fighting terrorism in any way, shape, or form" (The
USA–PATRIOT Act and the American response to terror; panel discussion, 2002, para. 18). From a
civil liberties perspective, the surveillance expansion provisions within the Patriot Act are troubling
when considering the possibility of abuse, and the trouncing of fourth amendment rights. Another
troubling consequence of the Patriot Act and the expansion of surveillance powers is the use of
profiling. In order to efficiently gather intelligence information for the safety of this country, it
would be common sense to develop a target of sorts to better focus the efforts made. Many believe
that Muslims in this country have become the unfortunate targets of profiling. The monitoring of
those with family and business ties to countries rooted with terrorism is a logical direction for

The USA Patriot Act, 2001 By President George W. Bush
What exactly does the USA PATRIOT ACT mean? The USA PATRIOT Act was signed on October
2001 by President George W. Bush. It was an acronym that stood for Uniting and Strengthening
America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. It was
an extremely long act that was meant to improve surveillance and security procedures, yet many felt
that it is based on stereotypes. Some of the provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act were to assist the
government agencies discover and avoid any potential instances of terrorism. There are many people
who feels that the United States is in need of this Act due to the way it assists in preventing
terrorism. People felt that it gave an extreme amount of power to the law enforcement

Ethics of the USA PATRIOT Act Essay example
Ethics of the USA PATRIOT Act
Another week, another series of patches to download from Microsoft. It seems like every week,
Microsoft is under siege from one virus or another. The complexity in the billions of lines of code
embedded in its products make it impossible to be error–free. If it is this easy for hot–headed M$
haters to breach the world's largest software maker, one has to ask: how hard would it be to expose
vulnerabilities in the most sophisticated and technologically dependent country in the world?
That is exactly what the US government is mulling about. The Information Age has brought
unparallel speed of communication plus an immeasurable breadth of information to our fingertips.
On the same token, it is also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Similarly, trap and trace devices checked what incoming phone numbers were calling a particular
phone line. The USAPA now enables the FBI to eavesdrop on all computer routing, addressing and
signaling information. It is done with a huge software system called Carnivore. This system filters
through all internet packets (pieces of information traveling on the internet) that travel through a
specific ISP, sniffing for a suspect's electronic communication. It can only be installed on an ISP
either with the ISP's permission or a court order. The sneak and peak provision permits government
officials with a warrant to search any tangible property or communications where notification of the
search can be delayed for a "reasonable period." This allows law enforcement to investigate without
having to worry about compromising the case by tipping the suspect too early. Another notable
change in the USAPA is it redefines of the term "foreign intelligence" to include domestic citizens.
It reflects the fact that the perpetrators of 9/11 were living in the U.S. for years. Now foreign
intelligence is defined as "information relating to the capabilities, intentions, or activities of foreign
governments or elements thereof, foreign organizations, or foreign persons or international terrorist
activities." The definition continues about a U.S. person that concerns a foreign power or

The Usa Patriot Act
In the mist of America ending its wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan here in the homeland we are still
be proactive in trying to alleviate terrorist threats and opportunities for terroristic activity in our
backyards. When looking at the USA PATRIOT ACT that was enacted to help battle this ongoing
pandemic it has come into question whether the laws of the USA PATRIOT ACT extremely broad,
narrow, and overarching that they leave too much room for interpretation which in the end has led to
violations of a person's rights that they are guaranteed by the US Constitution.
Since the passage of the USA PATRIOT ACT in 2001 by then President George W. Bush and the
renewal of it in 2011 by President Barrack Obama, there has been much debate over ... Show more
The two provisions that were struck down revolved around the 4th Amendment of unreasonable
search and seizures in regard to intelligence gathering. This ruling stems from a case where the
federal government arrested an attorney in the United States in connection with his alleged
involvement with the 2004 Madrid train bombings. The lawsuit stated that the FBI illegally and
secretly broke into both his home and office to gather evidence and were being protected under
provisions of the US Patriot Act.
Looking at an article titled How the Patriot Act Violates Virtually the Entire Bill of Rights written by
Hamilton, S in 2011. Hamilton takes a hard look at the Bill of Rights from the U.S. Constitution as a
whole and begins to bring parts of the US Patriot Act the violate the given amendment. Most of the
first ten amendments have at least one article or portion of the Patriot Act that clearly violates the
unalienable rights that American citizens were afforded at the time the U.S. Constitution was
initially signed. S.N. Herman in his article The US PATRIOT ACT and the Submajoritarian Fourth
Amendment that was published in the Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review in 2006
deals completely around violations of the US Patriot Act in regards to the Fourth Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution. It brings forth the facts that support that we as American citizens have allowed
the government to chip away at our rights to be free from unreasonable searches and

Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act is defined as and antiterrorism law enacted by the U.S. Congress in October
201. The request was made by former President George W. Bush in responding to terrorist attacks
that took place on September 11, 2001 which was in New York. The Department of Justice's first
priority is to stop future terrorist attacks. (citation). The Patriot Act has helped out tremendously
since the September 11th attacks in 2001. The Patriot Act has protected a large number of innocent
Americans from horrific plans of terroristic harmful plans to solely destroy America and the way we
live. Although, Congress allowed only modest, incremental changes to the law it has preserved
American lives and liberty at its best from global terrorist networks.

Preventing Terrorist Acts with the USA Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act also known as "Uniting and Strengthening America Act by Providing
Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act" is an official record that was
ratified by congress and signed into law by former President George Bush. This law was passed to
prevent another event of terrorist attacks such as the ones that took place on September 11, 2001 in
New York City and Washington, D.C. In less than two months of the 9/11 attacks, this act was
released to inform citizens of the United States that their freedom from interference would soon
come to an end. Ever since the Patriot Act was put into effect it has violated the American's civil
rights by allowing for invasions of privacy, permitting illegal searches and seizures, and legalizing
racial profiling. On Tuesday September 11, 2001 a group of 19 attackers associated with the Islamic
group al–Qaeda hijacked four airlines and carried out suicide attacks targeting against the United
States ("9/11 attacks"). These terrorists simply smuggled illegal weapons through security check and
boarded four flights heading for California, two departing from Boston, one from Washington, D.C,
and another from Newark, N.J. Two aircrafts were crashed into the World Trade Center in New York
City, a third was crashed into the Pentagon out of Washington, D.C and a fourth was crashed into a
field in Pennsylvania ("9/11 attacks"). The two planes that were crashed into the World Trade Center
and the one that was

The Usa Patriot Act : An Act Of Political Upheaval
Sean P. Cooper
POLI 308 – US Presidency
Newman
18 November 2014
THE USA PATRIOT ACT – An Act of Political Upheaval This paper will focus on the background,
purpose, implementation, major criticisms, and current standing of the Uniting and Strengthening
America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act
(hereafter referred to as the USA PATRIOT Act). The USA PATRIOT Act is currently one of the
most controversial and divisive political doctrines that exist in modern day America supported and
vexed by the entire political spectrum for various reasoning. Although in its inception it was met
with staggering approval and support, over time skepticism and fear of an ever–increasing strain on
civil rights ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Understanding the USA PATRIOT Act requires a look at the United States government and its
functions prior to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The government response system was
disjointed and ill prepared for a situation such as this: multiple simultaneous hijackings of
commercial airline planes being used as missiles to eliminate a target. Individuals in the FAA had
never experienced multiple hijackings over American soil; therefore, little existed to thwart and
counteract these actions (9/11, 10). When the first plane struck the world trade center, neither the
President nor any of his staff or advisors knew any planes had been hijacked, nor did they know that
the plane had struck the tower. According to the 9/11 Commission Report on the morning of the
terrorist attacks President George W. Bush kept informed and in contact through a series of phone
calls rather than with an "open line of communication." Not only did this limit the speed of
communication, but it also eliminated the President's ability to quickly assemble top advisers and
agencies to further combat this issue. The government did not even know that flight 93 had been
hijacked until after it crashed at 10:03 A.M., a little under an hour after it had been taken over by
terrorists (9/11, 40–45).
Very little existed in ways of interstate and interagency communication before,

Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act
The USA PATRIOT Act violated many American civil rights and carried out many unnecessary
searches of innocent Americans. It sacrifices civil liberties for government power. The USA
PATRIOT Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, was passed shortly after the attacks of 9/11. It was
signed by President George W Bush because he believed that the act would help America bring a
halt to terrorism. However, in his efforts to track down terrorism, the act also violated American
privacy rights. The act violates citizens civil rights by violating the Fourth Amendment of the US
Constitution. The Fourth Amendment states that government agents or law enforcement officers
may only carry out searches and arrest after obtaining search or arrest warrants from the courts. The
act also violates the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The Fifth Amendment states that all
US citizens have the right to "due process" of law, meaning that no one can be deprived of their life,
liberty, or property without a fair trial. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) authorized
warrantless surveillance, but only to obtain foreign intelligence information. But the government
violated this and the FBI ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It did help the government to fight terrorism. But it has some cons too. It gave too much power to
the government and violated privacy rights and gave nearly unlimited power to the NSA. But then
on May 13, 2015, Congress passed the USA FREEDOM Act, which stands for Uniting and
Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping, Dragnet–collection and
Online Monitoring Act, got rid of the bulk–collection, declassified "secret–court" information,
renewed some of the Patriot Act to protect America against terrorism, restores freedom the Patriot
Act took away, and now, the NSA needed a warrant to get an individual's electronic and internet

The Usa Patriot Act And The Homeland Security Act

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Amanda Detwiler

More from Amanda Detwiler (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Usa Patriot Act And The Homeland Security Act