Patricians And The Plebs Research Paper

Patricians And The Plebs Research Paper
Dr. Ng, The situation between the patricians and the plebs were just social classification that had some aims for the Roman executives that the plebs
seemed just like foreigners, although they were rich, very rich, poor, or military personal. Yes, they involved in many business and military
activities, but they were not allowed to be commanders or leaders in the military at first, but later, the plebs took the advantage of some privileges
after the social reform, for example, Lex Licinia Sextia. The plebs demanded for social reforms because they wanted to pay off their debts, to make
profits through their lands and farms, to have lands to use and make them be profitable for themselves, and to have some executive duties to represent
the other
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Differences In Ancient Rome
Written Assignment Unit 4: The Economic and Political Differences Between the Patricians and the Plebeian Classes and the Results of the Revolt
Ancient Rome was comprised of two main classes of people; the Patricians and the Plebeians. Their many differences in both economic and political
status lead the way to the uprising and revolt of the Plebeians that would forever change the economic fairness and governing of Rome.
The term Patrician refers to the ruling class of Ancient Rome. They were derived from the old governing elite and Senatorial families. According to
Roman Tradition Romulus, himself, created and divided the Patrician class. As a show of self–importance, they were appointed by the Founder of
Rome. Also, it is factual that they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The hosted strikes and would leave the city for a time of refusal to work and even participate in the Army. These walkouts would significantly cripple
Rome as we have learned that the Plebeians were the craftsmen and laborer of the country. Over time, and many battles, the Patricians gave into many
of the demands of the Plebeians. They were granted the right of running and holding more prominent positions in the government. They were given the
right to marry within both classes.
One of the first concessions granted to the Plebeians was the Law of the Twelve Tables. This would ensure the protection of fundamental rights and
that their voices were heard and also that the laws were applied fairly and justly to both classes. As the revolt progressed, the Plebeians gained the right
to elect their governmental officials, Tribune, who represented them and fought solely for their rights and had veto power over the Roman Senate.
As time passed, fewer laws existed between the two classes. The Plebeians could and would be elected to the Senate as well as the Consuls. Both
classes could now inter–marry. There now existed wealthy Plebeians who ultimately became part of Roman Nobility. Despite the enormous changes,
the Patricians would continue to hold a majority in the wealth and power of

How Did Social Class Change In Ancient Rome
Imagine that you were a citizen in Ancient rome. Would you be a patrician or a plebeian? Plebeians are the lower class of ancient rome and make up
95% of the population. Patricians were the upper class of ancient rome and made up 5% of the population. Having 2 different Social classes causes
their to be change in the Social, Political and Economical Characteristics of Ancient Rome.
A political aspect of anger rome was the forms of government they had. The 2 social classes affected this because they helped shaper rome.
According to Rome as a World of Power ""Rome became a republic, but it was an aristocratic, and not a democratic republic" (2).Thepatrician had all
the say in the government to start. It could also be classified as an oligarchy. Having a republic or an oligarchy relates to political because it is a
form of government and their problems that were caused. But soon the plebeians rebelled and the patricians agreed to let citizens vote. But it was not
everybody who lived in rome was a citizen. In the article Rome as a World of Power it says that "The inhabitants of the... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In Ancient Rome, the plebeians lived in the country and the patricians lived in the city. According to Rome as a World of Power, "Patricians, for the
most part, lived in the city; and their property was protected by the city walls. But the homes of the plebeians were generally in the country" (3).
This means that the poor people lived in the country, while the rich had nice homes that were safe. This affected geography because the 2 social
classes were in different locations caused the people to be more scattered out across the way and change population density. Since 5% of the
population was patricians the patricians that did live in the country often owned farms and had slaves do work for them. So, it caused their to be much
higher population density it certain sections. It was not an even

The Patricians And Patricians
Introduction:
The Republic of Rome was divided into two classes known as the Plebeians and the Patricians. These two groups of people lived in close proximity
with each other but they had different social statues and were not entirely treated the same. Both classes had rights however the Patricians didn't share
equal rights with their neighbors, the Plebeians. So great was the economic and political differences between the two classes that it eventually led to a
revolt by the Plebeians within Rome.
Body:
In Ancient Rome, the patricians were the wealthy people and also the rich land owners who lived in the city. They also owned slaves who worked for
them. These men were usually composed of aristocrats, the noblemen and the upper ruling class in Rome. The plebeians, on the other hand, were the
commoners and other free Romans who were the workers, farmers, builders, artisans, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2 tribunes from among the plebeians were elected and had power to forbid any unjustness upon all citizens. The Plebeians now had representatives in
the government.
An agrarian law was also passed that intended to reform the division of public land. Land which belonged to the whole state would now be justly
distributed among all citizens.
Conclusion:
The patricians and plebeians had various differences between them. These issues infuriated the Plebeians much so that they started an uprising. The
patricians didn't share equal rights with their neighbors the plebeians and not surprisingly, the plebeian revolt occurred. If the patricians had treated
them better I believe there would have been political and economic growth. The patricians should have treated the Plebeians the same way they wanted
to be treated.
References
1.Morey, William C. (1901). Outlines of Roman History. Chapter VII: The Struggle for Economic Rights. Section I: The Grievances of the Plebs. The
Power of the Patricians. Retrieved from

Republic And Struggles Of Plebeians
The Rise of Republic and Struggle of Plebeians
Introduction
It was the unification of two classes of Rome (Patricians and plebeians) against the tyranny of kingship that gave birth to the republic of Rome,
however, it was the patrician who gained more power and influence in government and began to rule the lower–class plebeians. Eventually the
plebeians were successful to change the unfair condition and gain many political rights.
The unfair share of power
After the rebellion against the last roman king, the wealthier patrician made the all aspects of political power exclusive to themselves. All the
important officials and religious figures were and should elected from these upper class of romans. The two most important branches of political
power after the fall of kingship was the senate and the consuls but neither the members of the senate or the two consuls were elected from the
lower–class plebeians. The only place that the plebeians could participate in political power was the Comitia Centuriata, and even in this assembly
their say was ineffective since most of the members of this assembly were also aristocrat patricians.
The hardship of plebeians' condition ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While the wealthy patrician was living behind safe city walls and their properties and families were well protected, the poor plebeians were living in
the country with no such protection for their families, their little houses and farms. At the time of wars these disparate people had to join the army and
fight for the all romans including those rich patricians as their unprotected farms and properties destroyed by the enemies and their families had been
taken away from their houses. Their situation was so bad that even some slaves who were living with patricians had a better standard of living
compared to many

Patrician Revolt Research Paper
Introduction
According to Morey (1901) The Roman Republic were comprised of The Patrician and Plebeian Classes. However, in no shape or form did these two
classes have the same rights. Perhaps more succinctly put, the Plebeians did not enjoy the same rights from an economic and political standpoint as did
the Patricians of Roman Society. This paper serves to discuss these and other conditions which ultimately led to the Plebeian revolt of Ancient Rome.
The end of Monarchy in Rome
Kings ruled in the Roman Empire for countless years however, over time, the Roman population became increasingly disenfranchised with tyranny and
the monarchs who ruled the land, as a result, the Plebeians and Patricians united in their efforts to rid Rome of its Monarchy ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, power utterly and completely fell to the Patricians to the extent that they held all of the new offices, to include seats on the Senate. In
addition, the new republic was aristocratic in nature and not at all democratic. This meant that absolute power was held by a wealthy few which did
not adequately represent the whole of society. This wealthy few were largelyPatrician.
THE INEVITABILITY OF THE PLEBEIAN REVOLT3
Non Inclusive Laws
The Plebeian community consisted of laborers such as farmers and builders as a result; they lived outside of the protection of the city walls. Ironically,
during times of war, while fighting, farmland and homes were often neglected or even destroyed by the enemy during conflict. Interestingly while
serving their country, the plebeians were deprived of their means of survival which is ultimately what led to their extreme poverty as they no longer
had the means to support themselves.
To further exacerbate the problem, the law of debt was enacted in such a way where in order to survive the Plebeians had to borrow money. In doing
so they were subsequently reduced to a debtor class where if the debt went unpaid, the borrower was subject to arrest, prison, or even made the slave
of their creditors. Morey (1901)
Land

Roman Patrician Research Paper
Ancient Rome was split into two classes: the aristocrats, known as the patricians, and the lower class, known as the plebeians. They lived
harmoniously alongside each other for a while, but after Rome began to rise from it's ashes the plebeians became resentful and decided to take action.
To fully understand the degree of their anger some light needs to be shined on their situation, and how the patricians treated them.
While Rome was rebuilding itself after the fall of the Roman Kingdom, it was a Republic. Meaning there were a small group of people that
represented the population, making decisions for the country. In this case they were all patricians. There is an obvious downside to this, all decisions
were made to benefit the patricians while ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the most important changes that occurred was the creation of new positions for plebeians in the government, tributes and aediles. There were
two of each position and they were elected by the plebeians, the tributes were the voice of the people and the aediles assisted them. The two tributes has
veto power over the patricians, making it so they couldn't create laws that were unjust to plebeians. Furthermore, the tributes could freely speak their
minds, and anyone that obstructed that freedom could be put to

Differences Between The Plefuans And The Patricians
Today for your review, a discussion of the economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeians and an examination of the results
of the first revolt.
According to Morey, (1901), in such an ironic conclusion, the plebeians had consolidated with the patricians to overthrow the kings that were in
power, and together were successful in this affiliation. However, while the patricians were awarded lands and gained more power after the kings
were overthrown, there were disastrous results for the plebeians. There are many things that lead to the revolt, first, while the plebeians had the right
to vote, they could not hold a political office, or sit in the Senate. The rule of the patricians proved to be as oppressive as the kingship had and the
struggle began in earnest between the two classes. Second to add insult to injury the plebeians were even worse off monetarily.
Not only were there great economic hardships, but the human suffering was just as great, most of the plebeians lived outside the city walls, with their
home and families vulnerable, and while the plebeian men were away serving their country, fighting in the war, their families were left unprotected and
many had suffered greatly at the hands of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They deserted their general and decided they would form their own city and defected beyond Anio, to a hill they called the Sacred Mount. The
patricians suddenly realized that this defection would cause the destruction of the Rome and began negotiations in earnest. A new protocol was made
and it was decided that all the debts would be canceled and any persons that were imprisoned due to debt were released. The most significant result of
this first secession was the appointment of Tribunes for the

Difference Between Patricians And Plebeians
Introduction
The patricians and plebeians were the two tribes that united to rule out the kingship in Rome. When the struggle to remove kingship ended, the
patricians gained more power from the victory than its alliance the plebeians. Even though the plebeians could vote in the comitia centuriata, they
could not hold office. Patricians were richer as compared to plebeians and despite Rome becoming a republic; it was an aristocratic way of
government and not democracy. In this text I am to discuss how this economic and political imbalance between the two orders led to the inferior
Romans known as plebeian to revolt.
The struggle against kingship left the plebeians poorer because they left their homes at most time, they are the ones who ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, they were not satisfied because the political powers still belonged to the patricians and the law was administered solely by patrician. So the
plebeians now demanded political equality and rights. This resulted in the second secession of the plebeians. The plebeians could be charged
unjustly because the law was only known by the patricians. Harsa the tribune proposed that the law be in writing and be published but it wasn't
approved until ten years later when the group of ten men called decemvirs gathered to draw up the law. They formed the XII Table which was a set
of laws. However, the law was still not fair to the plebeians because the patricians still claimed that they had the power of life and death. This
marked the beginning of the second secession. The tragic death of Virginia aroused the people to vengeance, after killing her daughter, with his
bloody knife in his hands Virginius ran to the soldiers and asked them to resist the power of the decemvirs (William, Ch. 8). The army followed by
citizens took their station again to the hill and decided not to defend the tranny. Before the state could be ruined the decemvirs were forced to resign
and the Valerio– Horatian law was passed. This resulted in the plebeians to be given the rights to form laws abiding all Romans in the assembly. From
this point the right of intermarriage was upheld and the plebeians had equal political rights with the

The Class Struggle Between The Plebeians And The Patricians
Running Head: THE CLASS STRUGGLE 1 THE CLASS STRUGGLE 4 The Class Struggle between the Plebeians and the Plebeians Hieu Le
Columbia Southern University 04/07//2016 The Class Struggle between the Plebeians and the Patricians In ancient Rome, there were two classes the
Patricians who were the descendants of the senators appointed by King Romulus, and the Plebeians or plebs who were the free and lower class
people. There was a growing tension between the two classes right from the foundation of Rome. The tension escaladed following the fall of Etruscan
king and the declaration of Rome as a republic; the rise of aristocrats? leadership. As Rome became economically weaker, the Plebeians were
marginalized both politically and economically

What Was The Conflict Between The Plebeians And The...
The Plebeians and the Patricians
Introduction
Ancient Rome consisted of two different social classes: the plebeians and the patricians. The patricians were the wealthy, upper class, whereas the
plebeians were everyone else. Although outnumbered by the plebeians, patricians saw themselves as morally superior, and this caused much conflict
among Roman life. The quest for power, equal rights, and land further fueled this discord. It took a series of laws, disagreements, and even a revolt, to
level the playing field among both parties. In this paper, I will discuss the qualities of each class, the changes in law that affected them, the revolt the
ensued, and the results.
Body
The patricians were a group of people who contained massive ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This left them resentful. Four, was the unequal distribution of land. Although all lands were owned by the people, the plebeians were denied them.
They were allowed to occupy the land, but had to pay rent to their patrician overlords. This angered them.
The plebeian plight changed in 494 BC. At this time, there was a revolt. Plebeians, fed up with the way they were treated by the Roman government,
rose up against the patricians. They called this struggle, "The Conflict of the Orders." This lasted for about 200 years. As a result, plebeians gained
more rights. They also fought back by protesting, going on strike, and refusing to work. Many fled the city of Rome to live elsewhere. This made a
lasting impression on the Roman government. A host a rights followed: the right to marry patricians, own land, and run for religious and political
positions.
Following the Conflict of the Orders, plebeians were granted many new political positions. One of these was known as a "Tribune." They were
elected by fellow plebeians and had the power to veto new laws from the Roman Senate. As time progressed, many plebeians acquired more wealth.
They were regarded as nobles, and could intermarry with patricians. Many were also elected to the Senate, and worked as consuls. Despite these
changes, the patricians still had the majority of the power. The Agrarian Law, suggested by consul member Spurius Cassius,

Economic And Political Differences Between The Patricians...
Introduction
In the fight for Rome's transfer from a monarchy to a republic, the Roman populace united in its entirety to achieve one goal, to get rid of the kings.
The Roman population consisted of two classes: The Patricians and The Plebians, in which their unity was crucial in the long struggle of ending the
unjust monarchy. While the plebians were less privileged in the aspects of economics and politics under the former monarchy, the early Roman
Republic witnessed an absolute domination from the patricians to the economic and political life in Rome. The patricians' oppression put the plebians
in even greater distress than they already suffered under the rule of the kings, which led to an inevitable revolt, known as the first secession. This paper
discusses the economic and political differences between the patrician and the plebeian classes that ultimately led to the first plebeian revolt.
Economic and Political Differences Between the Patricians and the Plebians
According to the Editors of EncyclopГ¦dia Britannica (1998), "Patricians were members of a group of citizen families who, in contrast with the
Plebeian class, formed a privileged class in early Rome". With the Roman Republic entering a new era after eradicating the monarchy, the patricians
practiced total control over the Roman affairs and claimed all the economic and political spoils. They dominated the political positions and decision
making was exclusive to them while taking control of the protected lands and

The Patricians And Pleminian Classes In The Roman Republic
Introduction;
The Patricians and Plebeian Classes together made up the Roman Republic. To no surprise, they were not entirely treated the same. They did not share
equal rights, although both had some rights, unlike slaves. They differed economically and politically. And ultimately, this all led to what would
become a plebeian revolt within Rome.
Body;
in Ancient Rome, the patricians were "the rich landowners that typically had a house in the city and a villa in the country run by slaves "Rymer,
2014)." They were the noblemen, the aristocrats, and the upper–class ruling class. on the other hand, there was the plebeian class. These men were free
Romans and were the commoners. it should be noted that many plebeians were in fact very wealthy. but they were the ordinary citizens that were not
considered elite and were those of any tribe without advisers to the King. These were the workers, the farmers, builders, merchants, artisans, etc.
In the Roman Empire, there was a power struggle going on. And the Roman populous was fed up with their tyrant kings. During the time when they
were overthrowing the kings, such as Brutus, they began to make new laws and make many political changes such as the Valerian laws, condemning
anyone claiming to be king as a traitor, the formation of three voting assemblies, etc. but backtracking, in order to overthrow the kings, the patricians
and plebeians united in their efforts to rid of them. Unfortunately, upon the overthrow of the kingship and

Patricians And Plebeians Essay
The struggle between the Patricians and the Plebeian was a classic example of allies that again became enemies after a common goal was
accomplished. Time and time again we have seen this in our world's history, and most recently in WWI and WWII. The differences between the two
people were rooted deep, which ultimately resulted in the conflict. Whenever there is any sort of a class war, it is usually caused by one class feeling
oppressed by the other class. You could relate this to the post–Civil War African Americans, who fought for nearly 100 years to gain the same rights of
the white people they fought side by side with in the bloody conflict. In order to understand the conflict between the Patricians and the Plebeians, we
must first understand how these people differed politically and economically.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Patricians were mostly wealthy city dwellers, who's property was protected by the city and its walls. Patricians controlled most of the trade and
commerce in the area, and had major influence over the Plebian people economically. On the other end of the spectrum, the Plebeian's were poor
country folk, who's property was NOT protected by the city and was constantly being overrun by their enemies when off to fight in the Army. It was
very hard for the Plebeian's to stay ahead because of these factor's, and were often forced into debt by the patrician's, further oppressing them.
Politically, the Plebeian's were just as bad off as they were economically. They had zero power in Rome's aristocratic democracy, and were basically
limited to the will of the Patrician's. because of this unbalanced political power, Plebeian's who were unable to pay their debt were often arrested and
forced into slavery. This further oppressed the Plebeian people. Furthermore, the unfair division of public land kept Rome's land that was meant for
ALL people in the hands of the

What Is The Difference Between The Patrician And The...
Introduction:
The unit asked about the Economic and political Difference between the patrician and the plebeian class ultimately led to Plebeian revolt and asked the
results of the first revolt or secession. Therefore, my research paper also focusing on this historic development, from this unit understanding that I have
gathered the Patricians and Plebeian classes together made up the Roman Republic. These two historic classes development surprisingly was being
together and united in their efforts to drive out the king leadership. However, after the kingship ended both are not entirely treated the same and they
did not share equal rights. They differed economically and politically. Ultimately, their different impact and unfortunately led what would become a
plebeian revolt within Rome. According to Morey, W. (1901), "InAncient Rome history development", the patricians and plebeians made a great
history by United and in their effort drive out the monarchy kingship system. This was the time the Roman populous was fed up with their tyrant
Kings. The time when they were overthrowing the Kings, such as Brutus, they began to make new laws, and make many political changes such as the
valerian laws. Condemning anyone claiming to be King as traitor, the formation of three voting assemblies, etc. but backtracking, even though both
united in order to overthrow the Kings, Unfortunately, upon the overthrow of the kingship and the birth of the new republic, the major victories, and
power fell into hands of the patricians only.
One great example is. "The comitia centuriata" is one of the three voting assemblies. From the Romans, historic statement information record shows
that it is true plebeians, still vote in the comitia centuriata; but the point is they could never hold any of the new offices since then, nor could they sit in
the Senate. This makes a big difference between the two and mostly the power of the patrician's domination affected and the hurts plebeians very hard.
It was not only politically but the dominant was with every scenario such as including politics, economics, integrity, and sustainability, also right and
the freedom of plebeians was affected under the

Patricians And Plebeians Essay
The Gap between the Patricians and the Plebeians
Introduction
After the kingship, the consulship was the first form of government established tin Rome. In those days, Rome was experiencing the Republic for the
first time. Consequently, the political, social and economic structure of Rome was an emerging one. The upcoming events would finally shape the
definitive government form of the republic. Anyway, we can clearly assert that at the genesis of the Roman republic the political system was rather an
Aristocratic one, instead of a Democratic one. In other words, the inequality between the Patricians and the Plebeians described a contrasting landscape.
Thus, those lines are about to discuss how the economic and political differences between both patrician and plebeian classes ultimately led to a
plebeian revolt.
Development
After the destitution of the king, Rome has become a new "kingship"; since the patricians who have all the power were so despotic to the plebeians. If
both patricians and plebeians did like the king; they also have some dissimilarity. The... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
So the patricians knew that in spite of the divergence they should preserve their unity with the plebeians. The project of creating an independent
city was unacceptable and inconceivable by the patricians who cannot exist without the plebeians. Finally, the patricians had made some
concession to the plebeians. That's why, the plebeians created the Tribune of the People which served as a "counter power" for the plebeians. The
Tribune of the People allowed the plebeians to veto the despotic laws of the patricians. In addition, the debts were canceled and the prisoners were
free. Moreover, the Plebeians Assembly gives any plebeians a say in the public affairs of Rome. Finally, the Agrarian Law of Spurius Cassius would
be considered as the satisfaction point of the plebeians. However, he was the victim of a conspiracy and died with his goodwill to better the plebeians'

The Plebeian Revolution
discuss how the economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeian classes ultimately led to a plebeian revolt. Include in
your discussion the results of the first revolt or secession. Greek and Roman Civilization Unit4 Assignment Early Roman Republic; Conquest of
Italy University of the People Introduction My paper will quickly outline or educate reader(s), the economic and political differences between the
patricians and the plebeian classes eventually led to a plebeian revolt. I will also include in my paper information about the first revolt or secession. I
believe it's fair to say that the Patricians people were very wealthy. This being said, they perhaps were the leaders of the more important... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Plebeians were the merchants, farmers, and the craft workers of Rome. The Plebeians refused to fight in Rom's way in after the Senate
declared war in 491 BC. This was because the Patricians forbade the Plebeians from taking part in the Senate, so they stood their grounds and
decided not to take part in their war. It is told that the Plebeians removed themselves from the city until a time they had the right to elect their own
leaders, which This Historians calls the struggle of the orders. Also, their great struggle aid in the continued effort of the plebeians to achieve
political equality to safe guard economic relief for their less fortunate people, and to break the political and religious control (monopoly) of the
patricians. The Plebeians didn't remain under the control the Patricians forever. It took some time, but bit by bit, closer to the end of the early
republic they were partly successful and took back some control they could of the old priesthoods, the office of interim head of state and possibly
the senate leader. In the late republic to the 1st century BC, distinctions between patricians and plebeians lost political importance for differences or
distinctions; in fact, some patricians were adopted and became plebeians and so on. Regarding the first plebian revolt: It led to the removal of debts
and the freedom at last from the hash laws and control they were put under. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica (n.d.) the tribune was elected
by the plebeians which symbolizes freedom and where their people now had a voice. Their objectives were to offer their people, mostly the less
privilege a better and safe livelihood. The

Patricians And Plebeians In Ancient Rome
In ancient Rome, citizens were classified into two separate groups: patrician or plebeian. The patricians were the privileged class of citizens in early
Rome; they had the nobility of birth, were wealthy, and monopolized the political and religious aspects of Rome in early times ("Patrician," 2014,
para. 2). In contrast, the plebeians were the general citizenry that made up the majority of the Roman population; initially, they were excluded from
the Senate and all public offices ("Plebeian," 2014, para. 1). The distinction was possibly based on wealth and influence of certain aristocratic families
that became the patricians; intermarriage was also forbidden between the two classes in the beginning ("Plebeian," 2014, para. 1). Originally, Rome...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
6 UNIT 4 ASSIGNMENT– PATRICIANS AND PLEBEIANS Furthermore, the Plebeian Assembly, which had previously been held occasionally,
would become a permanent assembly thereafter. This assembly, the concilium plebis, could be called together by the tribunes to address the interests
of the people, and no magistrate could interrupt or break up the assembly (Morey, 1901b, the First Secession and Its Results section, para. 3).
Additionally, resolutions binding upon the plebeians could also be passed by the assembly. As such, the plebeians finally acquired a position in the
state. 5. Conclusion Up until the first secession, the plebeians suffered from poverty and continual debt caused by the unfair Roman debt law. The
political and economic oppression of the patricians had driven the plebeians to revolt. As a result, the patricians were forced to acknowledge the
importance of plebeian army in Rome's national defence against foreign enemies. Hence, the plebeians fought for and finally acquired their first
foothold in the Roman politics. There would be other revolts later on that would involve further improvements to plebeian class; however, the first
secession was the initial step that the plebeians took in fighting for their own

Patricians Vs Plebeians
In this paper we will be discussing The Economic and Political differences between the Patricians and the Plebeian classes. In ancient Rome, the
patricians were "the wealthy landowners that generally had a residence in the metropolis and a villa in the u.s.a. of us run by means of slaves. The
plebeians should nonetheless vote inside the comitia centuriata; but they could not maintain any of the modern day offices, nor must they sit inside the
Senate. They had been the noblemen, the aristocrats, and the higher elegance ruling elegance. It wouldn't have been so terrible, and the plebeians might
now not were in such an uproar had the patricians no longer used their political energy in such pompous and abusive approaches. It's miles recounted...
After the spoils of conflict, the ruling patricians unfairly and unequally divided and disbursed the public land in addition to a few different subjects.
With the plebeians already disenchanted and already feeling as though their remedy changed into unfair, the patricians simply made it worse. Those
troubles are in reality scratching the floor although. Among the referred to troubles along with not being capable of take a seat inside the Senate, not
being able to maintain place of job, between the plebeians being disillusioned about their land being destroyed in struggle at the same time as the
patricians land modified into covered, and the plebeians being constantly in debt to the patricians changed into sufficient to begin a revolution. So when
they went to struggle they were prevented for the exceptional of everybody. They already have been generally not as wealthy due to the fact the
patricians. But they were the regular citizens which have been not taken into consideration elite and were those

A Marxist Reading of Shakespeare's Coriolanus Essay examples
A Marxist Reading of Coriolanus
One popular dissecting instrument of any Shakespearean character is the modern tool of psychoanalysis. Many of Shakespeare's great tragic
heroes–Macbeth, Hamlet, King Lear, and Othello, to name a few–have all been understood by this method of plying back and interpreting the layers of
motivation and desire that constitute every individual. Add to this list Shakespeare's Roman warrior Coriolanus. His strong maternal ties coupled with
his aggressive and intractable nature have been ideal fodder for modern psychoanalytic interpretation. This interpretation, however, falls within a larger,
political context. For despite the fact that Coriolanus is a tragedy largely because of the foibles of its title ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Marxism, essentially, is a theory of the proletarian liberation movement. This theory isdialectic in that society is seen as a composition of contraries
(e.g., rich vs. poor), and that what makes humanity evolve is the struggle between these contraries. The triumph of one over the other produces change.
Change, however, is resisted by the ruling class because most, if not all, of the wealth is concentrated in their hands; they in turn control the means of
production, allowing them to exploit the workers for their own ends and widen the gap between the rich and poor even more in the process. This
situation produces alienation in the worker; it deprives him of something, and this is not only degrading but depersonalizing as well (Appignanesi, 79).
From this perspective, Menenius' fable of the belly is clearly fallacious and intended to instill a false state of consciousness in his listeners. The tale
deflects the cause of the plebeians hunger from the patricians right back at the plebeians themselves:
... For the dearth,
The gods, not the patricians, make it, and
Your knees to them, not arms, must help (I.i.63–65).
Modern capitalist apologists use much the same argument as this, only instead of directing the working class to pray to the gods to better their lot in
life, they

How Did The Roman Americans Become Patrician Citizens
At the top of all Roman society were the patricians right next to the emperors. Patricians were elites just below the emperors. Their lives were high
quality and luxurious. The throne was allowed to be passed to anyone as long as it was approved by the senate. In order to hold their place on the
throne, it would sometimes require backstabbing, betrayal, and even murder. These patricians were often wealthy landowners, but sometimes others
were chosen deliberately for this class.
Most boys born into a patrician family had an extensive education. They were taught poetry, literature, history, geography, and sometimes mythology.
Once they became young men they would go into politics and government. The patrician families were expected to continue ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
ladder)
The senators could hold the highest official offices in civil

The Twelve Tables Argument
The Twelve Tables were drawn up by the ten appointed patrician decemvir under the public pressure around 449 B.C.. They probably were the elder
to be qualified as a experienced statement, but they must be the male Roman citizens. There are a lot of bias in The Twelve Tables, such as pro
patriarchy, pro preseving blood line, pro–male, pro–healthy offspring, and the most obvious was pro–patricians. Laws in The Twelve Tables targeted
plebeians and have a presence to patricians. For example, it prohibited "the intermarriage between plebeians and patricians"(XI, 1). In order to
preserve the power in a small social group, such as the patrician, the intermarriage between the different social classes was strictly prohibited. In this
way, the power

Patricianss And Plebeians Research Paper
THE PATRICIANS AND THE PLEBEIANS After the fall of the kingship, Rome was essentially made up of two economic classes of free people.
The first were the Patricians, who were the wealthy who according to legend were the descendants of Romulus, founder or Rome. (Morey, 1901)
The second group, were the middle to lower class called Plebeians, or Plebes for short. As is the case in many societies, the interests of the
aristocracy and the common people were at odds. Under the new Roman Republic, the Patricians had all of the economic, social, and political power,
and the Plebeians had very little opportunity to arise from their class. As one would expect, this was a recipe for conflict between the classes. While
plebeians were serving in... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The plebeians had been rendered impoverished by wars, and as a result many had borrowed money from the rich. Under the law of debt, if they
were unable to pay their debt they could be arrested, imprisoned, or even lose their freedom. (Gill,n.d) Also, the plebeians were not equal partakers
in the spoils of war. Lands seized from the enemy during war should have been public property and as such should have afforded the plebes an
equal share, but that was not what occurred. Since political power resided with the patricians, they saw to it that land distribution benefited their
own interests. The patricians were allowed "occupy" land plots at a small rent rate and thereby kept the land under their control for long periods of
time. (Gill, n.d.) These grievances led the plebeians to revolt by refusing to serve the interests of the patricians by serving in the army. In 494 BC
they deserted their general's army and assembled at a placed called Anio seeking to establish an independent state. This event became known as the
first secession of the plebes. When the patricians saw that without the plebeians serving in their army would mean the demise of Rome, they canceled
their debt and release economic prisoners. (Morey,

The Struggles Of The Orders
A1. The "Struggles of the Orders" was when the Plebians rebelled against the Patricians for changes of their way of life because they did not like
the way they were treated and had no say. The Plebians did not know their own laws because there was no tablets or written documents saying all
of the laws. The Plebians wanted to make their own laws and have their own representatives kind of like our House of Representatives. They make
up a big bulk of the population and the Army, so they could try and influence change. In 494 BCE the Plebians end up going on a strike against the
Patricians. The outcome of the strike was successful for the Plebians. They were able to get the Patricians to write down all of the laws on 12 bronze
tablets. They were able to have their own representative called a Tribune that was able to veto acts of the consuls of the senate. There were laws in
place against physically harming a tribune. Plebians were able to marry into the Patrician class. They were also granted to the write to have at least one
consul must be Plebian.
A2. When the Romans conquered more land and saw the way the Greeks were living and saw all of the beautiful buildings they had they started to adapt
some of the Greek ways. They saw all of the amazing statues, baths and gymnasiums that the Greeks had and they started building their own. The
Romans started their own cosmopolitan. They also adapted the Greek literature and language for their own amusement like poetry and plays they

The Plebeians In The Roman Republic
In the Roman Republic, citizens were divided into two political castes: the Patricians and Plebeians. The Patricians were a wealthy upper class who
were descended from the earliest Roman families, while the Plebeians were essentially "everyone else." As I have explored in the fourth entry of my
Learning Journal, one reason why the Plebeians were so important was that they comprised the vast majority of Rome's total population. As such,
they had certain power to control the direction of the Republic; without them, Rome could not function, and the Plebeian class put this power to use
on more than one occasion. Their many secessio (secessions) would become known as the Conflict of the Orders (McManus, n.d.). There were many
political and economic differences between the two orders. Morey refers to them in four categories, though it is probably easier to think of them as
two types of inequality covering a range of greivances. First, there were the political differences; Plebeians were forbidden from holding political
office after the monarchy was replaced with a republic. But more importantly, there were often–large... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Patricians were much more capable of weathering a period of no income. Additionally, Patricians would gain control over supposedly public
lands, so the wars would make them even wealthier (Morey, 1901). Livy recalls a particularly vivid incident wherein a war hero charged into the
forum: "His dress was covered with filth, and the condition of his body was even worse, for he was pale and half dead with emaciation. Besides this,
his straggling beard and hair had given a savage look to his countenance." The war hero explained how, having returned from the war, he found his
farm destroyed and his cottage burnt to

Roman Women And Men Rights
Men and women did not have the same rights as each other. The romans limited citizenship and did not let everyone vote and could not be elected.
Slaves were considered property and lacked personhood. Women could not vote or hold political office. Men were named more frequently than
women by Roman historians. "Plebeians" were peasants compared to others. They lived in apartments but had no political rights. If they were lucky
enough, they could be a client or a "Obedient servant" to a Patrician family. The family would in return offer their protection to the servant. Patricians
were powerful, noble, ancient families. They were wealthy, lived in large homes and had political power in the Senate. They only married and had
businesses with their

How Did The Patricians Lead To A Plebeian Revolt
Introduction The Patricians and the plebeians formed a strong alliance to remove the kings and monarchy governments in the old Roman Empire.
This led to the end of the kingship in Rome. However the fruits or the benefits that came out of this victory favored the Patricians more than the
Plebeians. Therefore this essay look at the , three economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeian classes ultimately led to
a plebeian revolt. POLIITICAL POWER. Though united to remove the kings from Rome. There was a gap in the governance system of Rome.
Though it was a republic, it was not a democratic republic but an autocratic republic and the powers to rule rested in the hands of the Patricians. It is
true that the Plebeians did vote in the comitia centuriata but they could not hold any office and could not sit in the Senate. Beside that the rule o the
Patricians was no difference from the kings in terms of oppression and brutality, hence the Plebeians could not submit to the rule of the Patricians
forever and this was a recipe of revolting.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Patricians by virtual of being in power and rulers were more wealthy than the Plebeians. They lived in cities, property protected with City cities.
The poverty of the Plebeians was compounded by the fact that they participated in the wars to defeat the kings. They neglected their farms during this
period such that when the war ended, they were left in a very deplorable condition, and because of the greediness of the Patricians they could not live
in the cities but in the country side in the small

Compare And Contrast The Revolt Of Patricians And Plebeians
Introduction
During the period when the Roman Kingdom was struggling under the tyranny of Tarquin,
Patricians and the plebeians had united in their efforts to drive out the king. However, after the kingdom was overthrown, the patricians became
powerful in the Roman republic, which was an aristocratic government, rather than democratic (Morey, n.d.).
In this paper, I'll compare and contrast between the patricians and the plebeians, and address what drove the plebeians to revolt and carry out a
secession.
Allow me to open this discussion by first defining patricians and plebeians. The patricians is a term that originally referred to a group of ruling class
families in ancient Rome. ("Patrician
(ancient Rome)", n.d.) The plebeians, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The plebeians seceded from the army and declared not to participate in the wars. They made camp on the Sacred Mount
(Mons Sacer) in 494BC, and this secession led to a negotiated settlement with the patricians. The patricians saw that the loss of the plebeian army
would be the destruction of Rome, and that compelled the disbanding of the harsh law of debt. Moreover, the creation of the "Tribune of the
Plebs (Tribunes of the people)" was a revolutionary result of the first secession. It protected the plebeians from the oppressive acts of patricians and
gave them the rights to veto, which can forbid harmful rules for the plebeians (Morey, n.d.). These were positive improvements for the
The Patricians and The Plebeians, and The Causes and Consequences of The Revolt plebeians, but there was still another great cause of complaint for
them, which was the unjust land distribution.
A patriot and statesmen named Spurious Cassius made the effort to changing the unjust land distribution. He did so by proposing the first "agrarian
law", a law that intended to reform the division of the public land in 486BC s (Morey, n.d.). Cassius' intention was not to take away

Greek And Roman Civilization Essay
HIST 1421: GREEK AND ROMAN CIVILIZATION
What are the Economic and Political Differences Between the Patricians & the Plebeian class ultimately led to Plebeian Revolt HIST 1421: Greek and
Roman Civilization Written Assignment Unit 4 University of the People Term 5 (2016
–2017) Introduction:
The unit 4 written assignments asked about the Economic and political Defenses between the patrician and the plebeian class ultimately led to Plebeian
revolt and asked the results of the first revolt or secession. Therefore, my research paper also focusing into this historic development, from this unit ...
When they were overthrowing the Kings, such as Brutus, they began to make new laws and make many political changes such as the valerian laws,
condemning anyone claiming to be King as traitor, the formation of three voting assemblies, etc. but backtracking, in order to overthrow the Kings,
the patricians and plebeians united in their efforts to rid of them. Unfortunately, upon the overthrow of the kingship and the birth of the new republic,
the major victories and power fell in hands of the patricians. One such example is this. The comitia centuriata is one of the three voting assemblies.
From the Romans historic statement information "The plebeians could, it is true, still vote in the comitia centuriata; but they could not hold any of
the new offices, nor could they sit in the senate. The patricians could though. It would not have been so bad, and the plebeians would not have been
in such an uproar had the patricians not used their political power in such pompous and abusive ways. How the plebeians saw it, the patricians were
not better than the kings area, flaunting their wealth, but doing little good for the poor. There was an economic problem beyond what was just
mentioned within the politics too. It is known that the plebeians and the patricians united in their fight/ war to rid of the kings. However, there were a
number of wars that took place, For the patricians, in times of war, the city walls, living a

The Plebeians In Ancient Rome
Plebeians were critical to the security of Rome as well as to its economic, political and social development.
Military and economic importance
The second Etruscan king (Servius Tullius) was perhaps the first Roman leader to explicitly recognize the plebeians' military and economic potential.
Accordingly, he instituted reforms that included redistributing Rome into local geographic districts whose inhabitants, patrician and plebeian alike,
formed new "tribes" – 20 in total. All such tribesmen were then required to serve in the army and to pay taxes (Morey, 1901, Chapter V).
Together with re–organisation of the army, this greatly enhanced Rome's military capabilities enabling the conquest of neighbouring lands and the
overthrow of the monarchy. Ultimately, with astute building of lasting alliances and incorporation of outlying towns into the Roman domain and their
inhabitants into Roman citizenship, Rome came to dominate across the Italian peninsula and in the south. However, this would not have been the case
without the initial capability provided by the plebeians. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While slaves were a crucial component of the labour force, the agrarian economy was largely based on production from small land–holdings, often
worked by tenant farmers (Crystalinks, n.d.; Kehoe, n.d.). These farmers were usually plebeians, as were the majority of vendors in marketplaces.
Produce and other goods were supplied via the plebeians.
In addition, as in ancient Greece, attitudes to trade amongst the higher classes were often ambivalent or negative (Cartwright, 2013). It is therefore
likely that the plebeians played a significant role in

The Patricians And Aristocratic Republic
INTRODUCTION The Patricians and Plebeians were initially united and drove out the last King of Rome, Tarquinius Superbus, along with his
whole family in B.C.510. This allowed Rome and the Roman people to transition from a Kingdom to a Republic, however, because of certain
circumstances, the Plebeians were not allowed to fully participate politically and ended up as a subservient class to the Patricians. This created what
is called an Aristocratic Republic and not a Democratic Republic. This difference in political and economic power between these two groups
ultimately led to the Plebeian revolt. CAUSES As a general rule, the plebeians lived in the countryside and had farms and other property outside of the
protection of the city walls and the patricians mostly lived within the city walls. During the wars this created the situation where when the plebeians
were serving in... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This basically put them into a debtor class which if they fell behind in their payments they were likely to be arrested, thrown into a dungeon, and
made the slave of their creditor.(Morey, 1901) The terms were such that it was difficult, if not impossible, for someone to pay off their debts and
move out of the debtor class. The effect was to basically keep the poor in a perpetual state of poverty. This obviously did not sit well with the
plebeians and was a major source of discontent for them. This was referred to as the Unjust Law of Debt. Another issue that kept the plebeians
perpetually poverty stricken was the fact that public lands that had been acquired in war were not distributed equally amongst all people but instead
were rented out to members of the patricians. This effectively tied up the land in perpetuity and it was unable to be rented or sold to anyone else as
long as it was in this condition. This was referred to as the Unequal Division of the Public

Differences Between Patricians And Plebeian Classes
From the reading, discuss how the economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeian classes ultimately led to a plebeian
revolt. Include in your discussion the results of the first revolt or secession.
The Roman Republic consisted of the Patricians and Plebeian Classes together. Unlike you would imagine they were not entirely treated the same.
They did not share equal rights although both had some rights unlike slaves. They were different in both economically and politically views and
positions. Finally leading all this to what would become a plebeian revolt within Rome. The patricians were the rich landowners in Ancient Rome. They
have their own house villa in the country. Their own house villa in the country were run ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, formation of three voting assemblies etc. In this revolt both patricians and plebeians united in their efforts and get forwarded. But unfortunately,
the major victories and power came into the hands of patricians. Eventually coming to economic problem, at first when they made war against kings.
But patricians were wealthy and had houses. They have secured within the war. They had protection. But the plebeians are un–wealthy they had no
security and hence they lost many of their lives and many of their families. They mostly added as a fuel in the fire. Their land was ravaged almost they
lost everything their property in the war. This led them to become debtors to the patricians. As patricians were lending them money and punishing them
harshly if they not repaid the money. After the war they divided the public land and distributed among them and some other things. The patricians and
plebeians had their fair share of differences and strife. Between the mentioned issues such as not being able to sit in the senate, not being able to hold
office, between the plebeians being upset about their land being destroyed in war while the patricians land was protected, and the plebeians being
constantly in debt to the

Differences Between The Patricians And The Plebeian
Introduction
The patricians and the plebeian were two distinct classes of ancient Roman residence. The patricians were generation of aristocracy whereas the
plebeian were group such as the native peasants, laborers, merchants and other residence of Italian states that were grabbed by Rome. The plebeian
clearly outnumbered the patricians. Although they live together, their economic and political differences were so broad that there was always
tension between the classes. Because of lack of policies to bridge these differences, the plebeian who were the lower class had to revolt. In this paper,
I will try to analysis the economic and the political differences between the two classes and how this inequality led to a plebeian revolt.
Economic
The patricians and the plebeian had united to fight the enemy and after the late war, the plebeian were left in an economic hardship due to the fact that
most of their properties and home were destroyed by the enemy. On the other hand, the patricians were living in the city and their properties were not
affected by the wars. Due to the fact that the plebeians were mostly located out of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The main cause of this revolt was the harsh law of the debt which there was no legal way to redress their wrongs (Morey, 1901). They decided to
withdrew their generals from the army and allowed the patricians to fight any war by themselves and marched to a hill farther on the Anio called
sacred mount and proposed to form an independent city.
As the patricians saw what they plebeians were bend to do and knowing that the lost of the plebeians army will be the destruction of Rome, they were
forced to make serious concession and granted most wished of the plebeians especially the cancellation of debts and the released of imprisoned
debtors. This is how the first plebeians secession

Differences Between The Patricians And The Plefuan Revolts
Introduction
The republic of Rome was composed of the patricians, the plebeian classes, and the slaves. Unlike slaves, patricians and plebeians had rights, even if
these rights were not the same for both classes, they were different both economically and politically. Thus we shall analyze how these differences led
to what was to become a plebeian revolt in Rome.
Economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeian classes ultimately led to a plebeian revolt
Ancient Rome was made up of three categories of classes: patricians who were rich landowners, some possessed several houses and villas that were
maintained by slaves. They were aristocrats, nobles of the ruling class. There was a second category which was the plebeian ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Thus many kings were overthrown by the union of the patricians and the plebeians. Unfortunately, after the overthrow of royalty and the birth of the
new republic, political power fell into the hands of the patricians who used their power in a very abusive manner. The plebeian could vote but could not
sit on the senate unlike the patricians. But what revolted the plebeians better was the fact that they saw that the patricians were no better than the kings,
they strutted with their riches while making any attention to the poor.
In addition to the political boundary separating the plebeians from the patricians, there was also an economic boundary. The patricians being of the
nobles living in beautiful and sumptuous houses, owned, free from all the damage that can cause the war undertaken in agreement with the plebeians.
Their houses were protected by the walls of the city, which was not the case for the plebeians who were, as mentioned, above farmers, builders, etc.,
which means ordinary people who lived in Farms, in ordinary houses with a simple life; and when they went to war, they had no slaves to maintain
their gardens, their houses, their lands, which left behind, and sometimes even pillaged by the enemy. They went to war not only for themselves but
also for the whole country. And, here they find themselves deprived of everything and sometimes even their families were hunted of their

Plebians and The Patricians
Initially, plebeians and the patricians were united to drive out the despotic roman kingship. Rome was ruled by monarch, Morey, (n.d.). The roman
king exercised a lot of powers over his subjects, Morey, (n.d.). "He was the father of the whole nation, chief priest of the national religion, military
commander of the people (of whom he called to arms in time of war), justice was administered by him and had power of life and death over all
subjects, Morey, (n.d.). This may help explain why the patricians and the plebeians joined hands to drive the kings.
When the struggle was over, power fell into the hands of the patricians marking the beginning of another struggle– this time between the ruling class
(patricians) and plebeians. The plebeians were relegated to lesser class politically, Morey, (n.d.). They could participate in the "democratic process" by
voting in the comitia centuriata. However, they were not allowed to hold any of the new offices neither could they sit in the senate, Morey, (n.d.).
When they drove the kings out, Rome became a republic but one which was more of aristocratic than democratic, Morey, (n.d.). This means that the
political power among others was concentrated in the hands of a particular class (few) instead of the whole people, Morey, (n.d.). This brewed
discontent, political discomfort, and discord among the plebeians. The plebeians would have easily (perhaps) submitted to the patrician government if
only the patricians would have exercised caution

How The Strict Social Classes Of Ancient Rome
Early in Roman society classes were divided by strict customs. However, in order to maintain their power Rome began to change the rules of society.
This change allowed the people to move classes therefore gaining more capable men to lead. Throughout the reign of the Roman Empire there were
several classes, most notably were the Patricians, Senators, Plebeians, Freemen, and Slaves. (McKay, et al., 2014). Society was based on heredity,
property, wealth, citizenship, and freedom.
The Patricians were the pinnacle of Roman elite just below the emperor and his relatives. Patrician refers to those members that were of the ruling class
of Ancient Rome. They were the ones who derived from the old ruling elite and powerful families. We know that the

What Are The Differences Between The Patricians And...
The Patricians were a privileged class of Roman citizens, membership in the Patrician class was hereditary and was only ever achieved by birth. On
the other hand, the Plebeians were all of the citizens of Rome whom weren't Patricians. Plebeians were average working citizens of Rome – farmers,
bakers, builders or craftsmen – who worked hard to support their families and pay their taxes. Romans were in fact able to tell whether you were a
Patrician or a Plebeian simply by hearing your second name, this had a major impact on both the Plebeians and Patricians ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There began to be a lot of clashes between the people, the way the Patricians ruled began to irritate the Plebeians, bringing them to the edge of
revolt. Lucius Sicinius Vellutus advised the plebeians to secede en masse to the Mons Sacer (The Sacred Mount), a hill outside of Rome. The senate
was panicked by this and dispatched Agrippa Menenius Lanatus, a former consul who was liked by the Plebeians, they saw him as one of their own.
Menenius was well received and told them the fable of the belly and the limbs, comparing the people to the limbs who chose not to support the
belly–and thus starved themselves, just as the belly and the limbs, the city could not survive without the Patricians and Plebeians working together in
unison. Plebeians negotiated for their return to the city under one condition. They wanted tribunes to be appointed to represent the Plebeians and to
protect them from the consuls power. Over two decades later, another tribune, Lucius Genucius, had a law passed requiring

Social Classes In The Roman Republic
The Roman Republic was made up of two social classes, the Patricians, and the Plebeians. Although these two social classes made up the republic
collectively, they were very different, These two groups shared a better social status than the slaves of Rome, but their economic and social
differences caused many historical problems in Rome, even a revolt. The patricians were very wealthy, they owned land and slaves, and were
known as the upper class in Rome. The patricians were also known as the aristocrats and had the advantage in the government and decisions in
Rome. The patricians considered themselves to be noble and privileged and a better choice for the ruling class. They felt that "certain people were
born to lead and others were destined to follow." (Wasson, 2018) The Plebeian class were common men of Rome, they were not slaves and were... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both social classes were tired of the continuous bad decisions made by trant kings that affected all people in Rome. Although the Patricians tried to
end the rule of the tyrants by measures to curb their power, for instance, the Valerian Laws. These laws allowed a Roman citizen, condemned to
death the right of appeal to the senators, patricians, and plebeians. Both parties worked together to rid Rome of bad kings, and that was the
beginning of a new Rome, but that was problematic for Plebeians because the Patricians remained in power despite the help of the Plebeians to rid
Rome of their terrible tyrant kings. The Plebeians felt that the Patricians only rebelled against the king's power so that they could be in power
themselves. After all of the struggling against the monarchs, the Plebeians made not gains in the political realm of Rome. The Plebeians also felt that
the Patricians made decisions and laws without the poor and lower class in mind, they made laws that only benefited the upper

Patricians And The Plebs Research Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Alison Carias

More from Alison Carias (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Patricians And The Plebs Research Paper