2. Initial Opinion
The first thing I noticed was the large array of
technology used for this analysis
This shows that lots of effort was put in to
the project
It also makes it more engaging
3. 3
The use of a video chat was very appropriate
It was engaging and well scripted
The talking was fluent and informative
Overall this has shown that if I am to do a video chat it must be well
prepared and informative
I also liked the use of frames within frames to aid with description
However it might be a good idea to record whilst the hoover is not in use!
4. 4
Once we reach question 2, things become a
little difficult to read due to the font and small
text size
This is partly because of the use of Prezi
5. 5
The use of images was helpful in explaining the text
6. 6
I like how Lew described and explained various
techniques/elements before evaluating his own work
This is something that would be good to include in my evaluation
There is also evidence here of using skills other than media for the
evaluation which I will probably also incorporate
7. 7
The use of media terms makes the
presentation look very professional and shows
that Lew knows what he is talking about
9. 9
My initial impressions of the Glogster post for
Q4 was that it is a little bit cluttered
However the arrows do help us to understand
where we should be looking
10. Lew has been self critical throughout the evaluation which I liked as it shows a
balanced view
10
11. The final question was once again very
11
descriptive and well put together with helpful
screenshots
However the ‘hoover’ in the background
sounded even worse due to the cutting
between audio!
12. Conclusion
I found Lew’s conclusion to be extremely in
depth and informative, mine must also meet
this standard
12
It was also engaging due to the variety of
technology used and the design of the final
Prezi
Finally, I liked how Prezi was used to piece
everything together
