The document summarizes the presentation of Andy Boenau and Chris Tiesler at the 62nd annual meeting of the Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers on March 31, 2014. They presented new statewide guidance for Virginia that includes a screening tool, spreadsheet tool, and design guidance document to help transportation engineers evaluate sites for roundabouts and standardize the design process. The tools are meant to help implement Virginia's policy of preferring roundabouts where feasible by providing a standardized process and analysis of safety, operational and cost factors.
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
SDITE 62nd Annual Meeting Roundabout Guidance
1. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Statewide
Roundabout
Guidance
Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Andy Boenau
Chris Tiesler
2. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Andy Boenau
Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
1.Background
Part
Statewide
Roundabout
Guidance
3. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Option A = familiar throughout the U.S.;
lots of death & destruction
Option B = familiar throughout the world;
lots of life & prosperity
Intersection Design Options
5. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
“We connect land use
(said every DOT everywhere)
6. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Virginia DOT
Transportation & Land Use
Publications
“fundamental modes”
“enhance quality”
7. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
“…[roundabout] should be considered
the Department’s
preferred alternative…”
Virginia Policy
8. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
If feasible, then preferred.
Why?
9. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
If feasible, then preferred.
Why?
10. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Since single-lane roundabouts are the
safest form of at-grade intersection,
why aren’t there more
in Virginia?
11. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Institutional bias
and the fear of change.
13. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Roundabout
1.Yield to traffic already in roundabout.
Rules of the road
14. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Traffic Signal
1. If the signal is a red ball, come to a complete stop
a) After stopping, you may turn right but must yield to oncoming traffic; except if the sign says "NO TURN ON RED", you cannot
b) After stopping, you may turn left on red from a one-way street onto a one-way street but must yield to oncoming traffic
2. If the signal is a green ball
a) you may go straight or turn right, but only if the way is clear - you must yield to vehicles still in the intersection
b) you may turn left but must yield to oncoming traffic
3. If the signal is a yellow ball
a) you may go straight or turn right
b) you may turn left but must yield to oncoming traffic
4. If there is one signal head for several lanes, it applies to all those lanes; if there is a signal head for each lane, each lane is governed by its own signal head; and if
there are multiple heads but not as many as there are lanes, generally a head centered above a lane governs that lane, a single head located above the line dividing
two lanes governs both lanes, and a single head centered above three lanes governs all three lanes
5. If the signal for your lane is a red arrow pointing left or right, come to a complete stop
a) After stopping, you may turn right on red but must yield to oncoming traffic; except if the sign says "NO TURN ON RED", you cannot
b) After stopping, you may turn left from a one-way street onto a one-way street ; except if the sign says "NO TURN ON RED", you cannot
6. If the signal for your lane is a red arrow pointing up, you may not go straight
7. If the signal for your lane is a green arrow pointing left or right, you may turn in the direction of the arrow, after yielding the right-of-way to vehicles within the
intersection, even if the red light is burning at the same time
8. If the signal for your lane is a green arrow pointing up, you may go straight, after yielding the right-of-way to vehicles within the intersection, even if the red light is
burning at the same time
9. If the signal for your lane is a yellow arrow, it means the same thing as the yellow ball, but applies only to movement in the direction of the arrow
10. If the signal is a blinking red ball, come to a complete stop and then enter the intersection, except you must yield to other vehicles already in the intersection
11. If the signal is a blinking yellow ball, enter the intersection with caution, except you must yield to other vehicles already in the intersection
12. If none of the bulbs on the signal head are illuminated (power outage), come to a complete stop and then enter the intersection with caution, except you must
yield to other vehicles already in the intersection
*special thanks to Ken Sides
Rules of the road
15. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
A motorist has to make a lot of decisions
If the general public trusts us
[deadly] status quo?
before driving through a traffic signal...
even when they aren’t fatigued or distracted.
to design safe infrastructure, can we
make progress by following the
16. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Transportation engineers now have
a much broader perspective about
the purpose and use of streets.
Complete street
Tactical urbanism
Walk to school
Arts district
Crosswalks
Bus shelters
Traffic calming
Livable street
Economic development
Bike to school
Less parking
Separated bike paths
Road diet
Placemaking
17. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
We have the engineering knowledge base.
We have a strong roundabout policy.
So how do we build
more roundabouts in Virginia?
18. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
2.Process + Tools
Part
Chris Tiesler
Statewide
Roundabout
Guidance
19. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Background
State agencies with successful roundabout programs generally
have
Policy statement
Process
Internally apply the intent of the policy
Tools
Assist in performing assessments
VDOT has a strong policy, but has lacked a process and tools
to consistently implement and adhere to its policy
20. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Three Tools
Screening Guidance
Planning-level feasibility
Spreadsheet Tool
Compare control forms
Go beyond operations
Easy to use/maintain
User Manual companion
Design Guidance
Principle-based
Resource
21. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Tool #1: Planning-Level Screening Document
Determine General Lane Needs
Figure 1 – Planning Level Daily Intersection Volumes (NCHRP Report 672 Exhibit 3-12)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Left-Turn Percentage
AADT
Double-lane roundabout
likely to operate acceptably
Single-lane roundabout may be
sufficient (additional analysis needed)
Single-lane roundabout
likely to operate acceptably
Double-lane roundabout may be
sufficient (additional analysis needed)
Planning Level Daily Intersection Volumes (NCHRP Report 672 Exhibit 3-12)
22. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Planning-Level Screening
Right of Way
Determine approximate footprint
Figure 1 – Planning Level Daily Intersection Volumes (NCHRP Report 672 Exhibit 3-12)
Adapted from NCHRP Report 672 (Exhibit 6-9)
Rounda bout C onfigura tion
Typic a l D es ign
Ve hicle
C om m on Ins c ribe d C ircle
D ia m e te r Ra nge *
Mini-Roundabout SU-30 45 to 90 ft
Single-Lane Roundabout B-40 90 to 150 ft
WB-50 105 to 150 ft
WB-67 130 to 180 ft
Multilane Roundabout (2 lanes) WB-50 150 to 220 ft
WB-67 165 to 220 ft
Multilane Roundabout (3 lanes) WB-50 200 to 250 ft
WB-67 220 to 300 ft
* Assumes 90-degree angles between entries and no more than four legs. List of possible design
vehicles not all-inclusive.
23. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Planning-Level Screening
Approximate magnitude/size of roundabout and associated
impacts can be initially judged
Consider:
Right of way
Environmental
impacts
Utilities
Topography
Figure 1 – Planning Level Daily Intersection Volumes (NCHRP Report 672 Exhibit 3-12)
24. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Planning-Level Screening
Network Interactions
Consider site and surround intersection(s) in close proximity
Intersection spacing?
Adjacent traffic control – related queuing characteristics
Corridor considerations
Roundabouts particularly desirable when:
Low percentage of through trips and high percentage of turns
Safety improvements desirable
Community enhancement/aesthetics
Traffic calming
High number of U-turns
Unusual geometry creates design and signal phasing challenges
Figure 1 – Planning Level Daily Intersection Volumes (NCHRP Report 672 Exhibit 3-12)
25. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Tool #2: Spreadsheet Tool
Compares life-cycle costs of roundabout to traffic signal or
stop-control across range of criteria
Elements included:
Safety
Vehicular delay
Operations and Maintenance
Capital design and construction costs
Right-of-way cost
Elements not included:
Emissions and fuel consumption
Other qualitative elements
26. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Key Takeaways
Easy to use
Requires basic information that is readily available
Evaluate criteria beyond traffic operations
BETTER DECISIONS
27. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
What do I need?
Opening year and design year ADTs
Recent turning movement counts
Operational analysis to determine:
Turn lane requirements
Control delay
Basic geometric layout
Historical crash data (optional)
Preliminary cost estimate
User is prompted for additional detail as needed (case-by-case)
Assumptions can be made
Straightforward inputs
28. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Introduction Tab
Provides spreadsheet
navigation
instructions
Color Coding
Orange cells indicate required
data entry
Blue cells indicate optional
data entry
Red text provides further
instruction
29. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
MainENTRY Tab
User-friendly drop list fields
allow for easy scenario
selection
Non-applicable fields
blocked out in gray
30. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Highway Safety Manual Content
Part C – Predictive Method
10: Two-Lane Rural Highways
11: Multilane Rural Highways
12: Urban and Suburban Arterials
Part D – Crash Modification Factors
13: Roadway Segments
14: Intersections
15: Interchanges
16: Special Facilities
17: Networks
Glossary
Part A – Introduction and
Fundamentals
1: Introduction
2: Human Factors
3: Fundamentals
Part B – Roadway Safety
Management
4: Network Screening
5: Diagnosis
6: Select Countermeasures
7: Economic Evaluation
8: Prioritization
9: Safety Effectiveness Evaluation
31. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
AdjustSPF Tab
Data entered uses
HSM Part C CMFs
to complete the
SPF calculations
Only fields for
selected facility
type are shown
33. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
VDOT Spreadsheet Tool - Results
Calculates the monetary
safety and delay benefit of
the roundabout
Compares to ops/maintenance
and initial capital costs
expenditures
Life Cycle Benefit/Cost Ratio
34. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Spreadsheet Tool Summary
Spreadsheet tool compares intersection control forms across
wide range of criteria
Operations
Safety
Costs
Construction
Operations/Maintenance (Life Cycle)
Easy to use and maintain
Supplements initial roundabout screening tool
User Manual provides detailed information regarding
methodologies
35. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Tool #3: Design Guidance Document
Condensed design guidance for practitioners
Emphasize key principles
Planning
Economic Evaluation
Public Involvement
Operations
Safety
Design
Design Vehicle
Splitter Islands
Truck Apron
Non-motorized Users
Curbs/Drainage
Traffic Control Devices
Illumination
Landscaping
36. Southern District Institute of Transportation Engineers
62nd Annual Meeting March 31, 2014
Next Steps
Roll out tentatively planned for July 2014 to coincide with
update to VDOT Road Design Manual
All three tools likely to be housed and available on VDOT’s
external Roundabouts website
http://www.virginiadot.org/info/faq-roundabouts.asp
Education & training for VDOT staff and consultant
community