The purpose of this historical artifact analysis was to compare and contrast the historical artifact of the library card catalog to the contemporary artifact of the online library automation catalog and the impact the modification has had on librarians, particularly the school library media specialist. The online library automation catalog is just a click away from accessing information globally. Although there are significant differences between the traditional card catalog and the online catalog, both provide users with access to information. The progression of the library card catalog demonstrated through history and because of the evolution of the card catalog; the impact of the shift changed the role of the librarian in school, public and academic libraries.
2. PURPOSE OF THE ANALYSIS
The purpose of this historical artifact analysis
is to compare and contrast the historical
artifact of the library card catalog to the
contemporary artifact of the online library
automation catalog and the impact the
modification has had on librarians,
particularly the school library media specialist
3. HISTORICAL CONTENT OF CARD CATALOG
The Age of Enlightenment 18th century
Industrial Revolution 19th century
Progressive era 20th century
Globalization 21st century
4. 18TH CENTURY
The Age of the
Enlightenment
Cataloging
Code of 1791
First
International
Cataloging
System
Medium was
Playing
Cards
French
banned
religious
vows
9. DIFFERENCES
CARD CATALOG AND ONLINE CATALOG
Functionality
Complexity
Accessibility
Searching features
Format
Storage
Cost and updates
Data elements
10. ANALYSIS
Role of School Library Media Specialists
Budget cuts in schools
Student Achievement linked to SLMC
12. REFERENCES
Fattahi, R. (1985). A Comparison between the online catalog and the card
catalog: Some consideration for redesigning bibliographic standards. OCLC
Systems & Services, 11(3), 28-38. doi:10.1108/10650759510101351
Gay, R. (1980). The Machine in the Library. The American Scholar, 49(1),
66-67. Retrieved from The Machine in the Library: http://o-
www.jstor.org.catalog.lib.cmich.edu/stable/41210586
Hopkins, J. (1992). The 1791 French Cataloging Code and the Origins of
the Card Catalog. Libraries and Culture, 27(4), 378-404. Retrieved 2014,
from http://o-www.jstor.org.catalog.lib.cmich.edu/stable/25542474
Husain, R., & Ansari, M. A. (2006, March). From Card Catalogue to Web
OPACs. DESIDOC Bullentin of Information Technology, 26(2), 41-47.
Retrieved 2014
Information power: Building partnerships for learning . (1998). Chicago, IL:
ALA Editions.
Kohl, D. F. (1978). Public Service and the Disappearing Card Catalog. R Q,
17(4), 308-311. Retrieved 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25826012
13. REFERENCES
Krajewski, M. (2011). Paper Machines: About Cards & Catalogs, 1548-1929.
(P. Krapp, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Retrieved from
http://site.ebrary.com/id/10517481?ppg=1
Matthews, J. R. (1982). Online Public Access Catalogs. Library Journal,
1067-1071.
Rury, J. (2012). Education and social change: Contours in the history of
American schooling (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Tenner, E. (2005). Keeping tabs: the history of an Information Age
metaphor. Technology Review, 71. Retrieved 2014, from http://0-
go.galegroup.com.catalog.lib.cmich.edu/ps/i.do?&id=GALE|A127622591&v=21
Wong, E. Y. (2012, June 19). Cataloging Then, Now, and Tomorrow.
American Libraries Magazine, 16(41). Retrieved 2014, from Rapid changes
are broadening the role of the "guardian of the catalog":
http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org