LTI in Action - Putting Reading Lists at the Heart of the Student Learning Experience at the University of Birmingham - Ann-Marie James | Talis Insight Europe 2016
[OpenStack Days Korea 2016] Track4 - 해외 사례로 보는 OpenStack Billing System
Similar to LTI in Action - Putting Reading Lists at the Heart of the Student Learning Experience at the University of Birmingham - Ann-Marie James | Talis Insight Europe 2016
The Triple A (AAA) of OER: Accessibility, Availability, and AffordabilityJeremy Anderson
Similar to LTI in Action - Putting Reading Lists at the Heart of the Student Learning Experience at the University of Birmingham - Ann-Marie James | Talis Insight Europe 2016 (20)
LTI in Action - Putting Reading Lists at the Heart of the Student Learning Experience at the University of Birmingham - Ann-Marie James | Talis Insight Europe 2016
2. LTI in action
Putting Reading Lists at the heart of the student learning
experience at the University of Birmingham
Ann-Marie James, Project Manager
3. Background: before TARL (Summer 2015)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Diorama,_cavemen_-_National_Museum_of_Mongolian_History.jpg
16. Survey of early adopters
Important – it’s the only way
that students are likely to use
it!
17. Survey of early adopters
Important – it’s the only way
that students are likely to use
it!
The list isn’t very visible on
Canvas – I’m not sure how
students find it
18. Survey of impact of LTI integration
I think it’s great – I see it
as an evolving list and I
tell that to students
19. Summary of progress
Over 170 (of 1600) lists owned by academics /
administrators
Canvas is the primary access route
Online courses highest users
21. Next steps – academic adoption and
mainstreaming
Increasing discoverability and
level of integration
Devolved constraints
Working with TEL teams and
embedding in educational
enhancement processes
Background:
Myself what we’re going to cover
Today:
- Background, reading lists and VLEs at UB
Why the LTI integration with Canvas and TARL is so important to us
How we integrated
Impact this has had for us to date, and where we hope to go with this
Implemented Summer 2015
Open source Reading List system (developed in-house)
Book focussed
Relatively little use
Some persistent links created using Primo (rare)
Canvas (bought 2013, as replacement for webct)
Usually included reading lists created in Word
Occasionally persistent links created using Primo
Limitations
Lacking a single source, no integration bet. Systems, no single sign on, little take up
Went out to tender (Summer) – integration with canvas KEY
Canvas
Critical driver for the integration: widespread use throughout the institution.
Canvas use 2015: 1655818 (Shibboleth logins)
Canvas key part of the University’s Education strategy, and particularly Technology-Enhanced Learning workstream. TEL central hub and College teams supporting canvas.
We felt this was a critical route for mainstreaming ResourceLists (rather than it just being viewed as another library system)
One of the first things I did as PM was gather an Implementation group. Had representatives from a range of non-library divisions – IT (sys side, for integrations with aleph and primo/sfx), registry (module and student data), and crucially central elearning team.
One of the first things we did was develop a project plan, and we adapted the standard plan from Talis and included the integration with Canvas.
Critical for us to develop this – as not all Schools use Modules option.
Need to make it clearer to students; visible straight away. Know that Auckland has done this, but difficult as if finds the wrong list and academic inadvertantly saves – impossible to edit / change from user end. So for us, felt too risky to add this straight-away.
Also like links at pages level – as many departments prefer the flexibility of Pages to create content.
Thank you Steve.
Fair to say, found it relatively straight-forward to set this up via modules.
Launched Oct last year, continue to gradually build up interest and ownership.
By Dec – canvas already top access route. We knew this would be the case in time, but we were surprised by the speed that it happened and surpassed the link from our Resource Discovery service. (findit) [could include a screenshot]
Continues to grow:
Last month, twice as much as direct already.
Top 2 – online distance learning courses.
3) New member of staff – integrated directly. Took it as given that she used Canvas and set up ResourceList link.
7 of 12 responses had integrated into canvas. Asked how important this was to them using Resource Lists
Quote 1: ‘important – it’s the only way that students are likely to use it’. No appetite to use another library system (even though is integrated into our resource discovery system – Primo)
However, going forward, greater discoverability – key. As an academic noted. (Quote 2)
This comment also conveys the sense that academics and students alike see canvas as the key access point; and highlights why integration is so crucial.
3rd things we asked: how easy the set up was: most found it “fairly easy” (6-7 / 10 for ease)
But mentioned ‘with instructions / handouts’ - suggests that it could be easier, and if we’re going to scale this up we need to make this easier.
[need to get the menu option working]
Final comment, highlights a bit more thinking about the pedagogic use of resource lists, and putting these at the centre of the student learning experience.
Structuring of lists and phased release
Use in PCAP – one of academics writing her assignment on use
Things academics are exploring:
Consistency of provision DL and on-campus courses
Anytime learning; learning styles
Spoon-feeding
As above, re: 3:
Came a good time for some of our online (DL courses)
However, for others – already invested a lots of time setting up lists (persistent links) in canvas, but interested in additional functionality of ResourceLists, so pursuing this further.
1) Increasing seamless access for students (need to happen across Resource Lists in canvas)
However, discoverability and seamlessness will be critical to take up for academics and students – top of our wishlist.
Secondly, devolved constraints – at the moment assigning academics list (admin heavy); DC will remove another barrier to take up.
Thirdly, and critically – we have a whole workstream on academic adoption, including mainstreaming.
Academic adoption side, we presented to Directors of Education last month with the vision is to “provide seamless access to all types of resources 24/7 from one place” and they could immediately see the potential for RLs to improve the stud learning experience. Focus very much on this, rather than the library processes (book ordering) side
Cascading promotion to College T&L committees, and then School T&L committees
- Presented to Teaching Academy, PCAP as part of Technology-Enhanced Learning strand, and generally good educational practice – and looking to include in TEL hub
Working closely with Educational developers. (more so than library reps).
So, in essence, when we started we were really thinking about improving NSS (Q16) – access to library resources; what’s evolved – much closer and clearer focus on how ResourceLists can directly support teaching and learning. Penny dropped with the PVC (Education) – said he after 2 years as PVC he now understands how the library directly supports T&L in a way (with RL being one of 3 initiatives he highlighted); and that majority of academics just haven’t got that level of understanding.
[discussion at CEC?]
We take heart from this!:
1) Continue to promote top-down (and report on uptake) and working on inclusion in PCAP – for new academics to consider wider issues around RLs
2) In terms of mainstreaming developing processes to pick up new modules, new academics key. And encouraging to note that we’ve already had at least a couple of academics who have used TARL at a previous institution.
3) On the ground. Every Subject Advisor has targets to promote to indiv depts and schools – a number of academics are doing this (colleague speaking in track 2 earlier).