SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 35
Pavement Design
I. Pavement Design
A. Overview
“Principal cause of pavement failure shown above—not the blacktop”
Degree of curvature
I. Pavement Design
B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
“How to build a road!”
I. Pavement Design
B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
1. The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a
penetration test for evaluation of the mechanical
strength of road subgrades and basecourses. It
was developed by the California Department of
Transportation.
B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
1. The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a penetration test
for evaluation of the mechanical strength of road
subgrades and basecourses. It was developed by the
California Department of Transportation.
2. The test is performed by measuring the
pressure required to penetrate a soil sample
with a plunger of standard area. The measured
pressure is then divided by the pressure
required to achieve an equal penetration on a
standard crushed rock material.
B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
3. “The Test”
Take load readings at penetrations of:
“the result”
0.025” ……………70 psi
0.05”……………...115 psi
0.1”……………….220 psi
0.2”……………….300 psi
0.4”……………….320 psi
Penetrations of 0.05” per minute
“Achieve OM &MD”
6” mold
4. Plot the Data
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Penetration (inches)
Load
on
Piston
(psi)
5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2
penetration.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Penetration (inches)
Load
on
Piston
(psi)
“The Gold Standard” for CBR
for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi
for 0.2” of penetration, 1500 psi
Example above:
for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi
for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi
The standard material for this test is
crushed California limestone
5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2
penetration.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Penetration (inches)
Load
on
Piston
(psi)
“The Gold Standard” for CBR
for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi
for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi
Example above:
for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi
for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi
Example psi = CBR
Standard psi
220 psi = .22, or 22%
1000 psi
300 psi = .20, or 20%
1500 psi
CBR of material = 22%
5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2
penetration.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Penetration (inches)
Load
on
Piston
(psi)
“The Gold Standard” for CBR
for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi
for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi
Example above:
for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi
for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi
Example psi = CBR
Standard psi
220 psi = .22, or 22%
1000 psi
300 psi = .20, or 20%
1500 psi
CBR of material = 22%
Use 0.1” of penetration, unless 0.2” is the greater value.
•If so, then rerun the test, taking the higher of the two values from this second trial
5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2
penetration.
“The Gold Standard” for CBR
for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi
for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi
Example above:
for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi
for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi
Example psi = CBR
Standard psi
220 psi = .22, or 22%
1000 psi
300 psi = .20, or 20%
1500 psi
CBR of material = 22%,
or “22”
In General:
•The harder the surface, the higher the CBR rating.
•A CBR of 3 equates to tilled farmland,
•A CBR of 4.75 equates to turf or moist clay,
•Moist sand may have a CBR of 10.
•High quality crushed rock has a CBR over 80.
•The standard material for this test is crushed California
limestone which has a value of 100.
Potential Corrections to the
Stress-Penetration Curves
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
Penetration (inches)
Load
on
Piston
(psi)
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
1. Determine
• The CBR values of the subgrade
• The type of use expected (runways vs.
taxiways)
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
1. Determine
• The CBR values of the subgrade
• The type of use expected (runways vs.
taxiways)
• The expected wheel load during service
• Types of CBR materials available for the
construction
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
2. Primary Goals
• Total strength of each layer only as good as what is
beneath it
• Therefore, must meet minimum thickness requirements
• “Don’t break the bank”
• Use less inexpensive CBR materials when allowed while
not shortchanging the project’s integrity
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum
pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement
designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load)?
“ a point on the curve for a
given CBR material represents
the minimum thickness of
pavement courses that will
reside above it, in order to
maintain stability
CBR subbase of 8,
Taxiway, and wheel load
of 40,000 lb
23 inches
“23 inches of
total earth material
and pavement”
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum
pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement
designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load)
What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)?
What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches?
23 inches
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum
pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement
designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load)
What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)?
What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches?
Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value
15,000 or less 50
15k-40k 65
40k-70k 80
70k-150k 80+
Wearing Surface
0-15k…….....2”
>15k-40k…..3”
>40k-55k…..4”
>55k-70k…..5”
>70k……..…6”
I. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum
pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement
designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load)
What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)?
What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches?
Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value
15,000 or less 50
>15k-40k 65
>40k-70k 80
>70k-150k 80+
Wearing Surface
0-15k…….....2”
>15k-40k…..3”
>40k-55k…..4”
>55k-70k…..5”
>70k……..…6”
23 inches
3 inches
6 inches of CBR 65/80
V. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum
pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement
designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load)
What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)?
What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches?
Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value
15,000 or less 50
>15k-40k 65
>40k-70k 80
>70k-150k 80+
Wearing Surface
0-15k…….....2”
>15k-40k…..3”
>40k-55k…..4”
>55k-70k…..5”
>70k……..…6”
23 inches
3 inches
6 inches of CBR 65/80
CBR = 80
3” 6”
V. Pavement Design
C. The Mechanics of the Design
3. An example
A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum
pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement
designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load)
What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)?
What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches?
What can we use for the remainder of thickness?
Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value
15,000 or less 50
>15k-40k 65
>40k-70k 80
>70k-150k 80+
Wearing Surface
0-15k…….....2”
>15k-40k…..3”
>40k-55k…..4”
>55k-70k…..5”
>70k……..…6”
23 inches
3 inches
6 inches of CBR 65/80
CBR = 80
3” 6”
Need = 9” minimum
thickness
CBR = 27 for
remainder of base
(14”)
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9”
of pavement courses above it.
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3” of wearing surface
6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”
CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9”
of pavement courses above it.
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3” of wearing surface
6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”
14” of CBR 30
CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9”
of pavement courses above it.
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3” of wearing surface
6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3” of wearing surface
6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”
A CBR of 15 requires X” above it
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3” of wearing surface
6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”
A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3” of wearing surface
6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”
A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it
A CBR of 30 requires X” above it
Another Example:
Given: Same CBR subgrade as
before
Materials available of:
CBR=15, 30, 80
Determine:
Optimal thickness of each
layer while minimizing costs
3” of wearing surface
6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”
A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it
A CBR of 30 requires 9” above it

More Related Content

Similar to Pavement design in civil engineering

BEST PPT ON TRAINNING ON CONTRUCTION AT INDIAN RAILWAY (DFCC)
BEST PPT ON TRAINNING ON CONTRUCTION AT INDIAN RAILWAY (DFCC)BEST PPT ON TRAINNING ON CONTRUCTION AT INDIAN RAILWAY (DFCC)
BEST PPT ON TRAINNING ON CONTRUCTION AT INDIAN RAILWAY (DFCC)
Utsav Tripathy
 
Aggregate impact and crushing test
Aggregate impact and crushing testAggregate impact and crushing test
Aggregate impact and crushing test
sudeepmahapatro
 

Similar to Pavement design in civil engineering (20)

Design of short columns using helical reinforcement
Design of short columns using helical reinforcementDesign of short columns using helical reinforcement
Design of short columns using helical reinforcement
 
desain perkerasan di bandara
desain perkerasan di bandaradesain perkerasan di bandara
desain perkerasan di bandara
 
pressreleasescurprurl1579103474899626198.pdf
pressreleasescurprurl1579103474899626198.pdfpressreleasescurprurl1579103474899626198.pdf
pressreleasescurprurl1579103474899626198.pdf
 
Road-design-standards-for-LGED.pptx
Road-design-standards-for-LGED.pptxRoad-design-standards-for-LGED.pptx
Road-design-standards-for-LGED.pptx
 
(mr. akash kolamkar) Rajapeth ROB Flyover seminar amravati an detailed struct...
(mr. akash kolamkar) Rajapeth ROB Flyover seminar amravati an detailed struct...(mr. akash kolamkar) Rajapeth ROB Flyover seminar amravati an detailed struct...
(mr. akash kolamkar) Rajapeth ROB Flyover seminar amravati an detailed struct...
 
(by mr.akash kolamkar) Rajapeth amravati rob flyover amravati presentation ps...
(by mr.akash kolamkar) Rajapeth amravati rob flyover amravati presentation ps...(by mr.akash kolamkar) Rajapeth amravati rob flyover amravati presentation ps...
(by mr.akash kolamkar) Rajapeth amravati rob flyover amravati presentation ps...
 
Recent Advances in Pavement Deisgn of Flexoble Papenent by IRC:37.pdf
Recent Advances in Pavement Deisgn of Flexoble Papenent by IRC:37.pdfRecent Advances in Pavement Deisgn of Flexoble Papenent by IRC:37.pdf
Recent Advances in Pavement Deisgn of Flexoble Papenent by IRC:37.pdf
 
CE 316 design of RC cantilever bridge
CE 316 design of RC cantilever bridgeCE 316 design of RC cantilever bridge
CE 316 design of RC cantilever bridge
 
COMPARISON BETWEEN CODES
COMPARISON BETWEEN CODESCOMPARISON BETWEEN CODES
COMPARISON BETWEEN CODES
 
BEST PPT ON TRAINNING ON CONTRUCTION AT INDIAN RAILWAY (DFCC)
BEST PPT ON TRAINNING ON CONTRUCTION AT INDIAN RAILWAY (DFCC)BEST PPT ON TRAINNING ON CONTRUCTION AT INDIAN RAILWAY (DFCC)
BEST PPT ON TRAINNING ON CONTRUCTION AT INDIAN RAILWAY (DFCC)
 
BIG BEAM 2014-2015
BIG BEAM 2014-2015BIG BEAM 2014-2015
BIG BEAM 2014-2015
 
PROJECT
PROJECTPROJECT
PROJECT
 
4320071.ppt
4320071.ppt4320071.ppt
4320071.ppt
 
Pavement-Design.ppt
Pavement-Design.pptPavement-Design.ppt
Pavement-Design.ppt
 
STUDY ON BOND MECHANISM OF PSWC BARS WITH CONCRETE
STUDY ON BOND MECHANISM OF PSWC BARS WITH CONCRETESTUDY ON BOND MECHANISM OF PSWC BARS WITH CONCRETE
STUDY ON BOND MECHANISM OF PSWC BARS WITH CONCRETE
 
Penta Capstone Semester 2
Penta Capstone Semester 2Penta Capstone Semester 2
Penta Capstone Semester 2
 
Aggregate impact and crushing test
Aggregate impact and crushing testAggregate impact and crushing test
Aggregate impact and crushing test
 
Village networking ppt
Village networking pptVillage networking ppt
Village networking ppt
 
Civil-Paper-II.pdf
Civil-Paper-II.pdfCivil-Paper-II.pdf
Civil-Paper-II.pdf
 
Pavement design
Pavement designPavement design
Pavement design
 

Recently uploaded

21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
rahulmanepalli02
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Dynamo Scripts for Task IDs and Space Naming.pptx
Dynamo Scripts for Task IDs and Space Naming.pptxDynamo Scripts for Task IDs and Space Naming.pptx
Dynamo Scripts for Task IDs and Space Naming.pptx
 
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
 
Dr Mrs A A Miraje C Programming PPT.pptx
Dr Mrs A A Miraje C Programming PPT.pptxDr Mrs A A Miraje C Programming PPT.pptx
Dr Mrs A A Miraje C Programming PPT.pptx
 
Databricks Generative AI Fundamentals .pdf
Databricks Generative AI Fundamentals  .pdfDatabricks Generative AI Fundamentals  .pdf
Databricks Generative AI Fundamentals .pdf
 
Basics of Relay for Engineering Students
Basics of Relay for Engineering StudentsBasics of Relay for Engineering Students
Basics of Relay for Engineering Students
 
Fundamentals of Internet of Things (IoT) Part-2
Fundamentals of Internet of Things (IoT) Part-2Fundamentals of Internet of Things (IoT) Part-2
Fundamentals of Internet of Things (IoT) Part-2
 
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
 
5G and 6G refer to generations of mobile network technology, each representin...
5G and 6G refer to generations of mobile network technology, each representin...5G and 6G refer to generations of mobile network technology, each representin...
5G and 6G refer to generations of mobile network technology, each representin...
 
What is Coordinate Measuring Machine? CMM Types, Features, Functions
What is Coordinate Measuring Machine? CMM Types, Features, FunctionsWhat is Coordinate Measuring Machine? CMM Types, Features, Functions
What is Coordinate Measuring Machine? CMM Types, Features, Functions
 
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence ( AI)
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence ( AI)Introduction to Artificial Intelligence ( AI)
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence ( AI)
 
Signal Processing and Linear System Analysis
Signal Processing and Linear System AnalysisSignal Processing and Linear System Analysis
Signal Processing and Linear System Analysis
 
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdflitvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
 
handbook on reinforce concrete and detailing
handbook on reinforce concrete and detailinghandbook on reinforce concrete and detailing
handbook on reinforce concrete and detailing
 
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptxanalog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
 
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
 
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptxAugmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
 
Independent Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station
Independent Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging StationIndependent Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station
Independent Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station
 
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdfInvolute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
 
Autodesk Construction Cloud (Autodesk Build).pptx
Autodesk Construction Cloud (Autodesk Build).pptxAutodesk Construction Cloud (Autodesk Build).pptx
Autodesk Construction Cloud (Autodesk Build).pptx
 
Computer Graphics - Windowing and Clipping
Computer Graphics - Windowing and ClippingComputer Graphics - Windowing and Clipping
Computer Graphics - Windowing and Clipping
 

Pavement design in civil engineering

  • 2. I. Pavement Design A. Overview “Principal cause of pavement failure shown above—not the blacktop” Degree of curvature
  • 3. I. Pavement Design B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) “How to build a road!”
  • 4. I. Pavement Design B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) 1. The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a penetration test for evaluation of the mechanical strength of road subgrades and basecourses. It was developed by the California Department of Transportation.
  • 5. B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) 1. The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a penetration test for evaluation of the mechanical strength of road subgrades and basecourses. It was developed by the California Department of Transportation. 2. The test is performed by measuring the pressure required to penetrate a soil sample with a plunger of standard area. The measured pressure is then divided by the pressure required to achieve an equal penetration on a standard crushed rock material.
  • 6. B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) 3. “The Test” Take load readings at penetrations of: “the result” 0.025” ……………70 psi 0.05”……………...115 psi 0.1”……………….220 psi 0.2”……………….300 psi 0.4”……………….320 psi Penetrations of 0.05” per minute “Achieve OM &MD” 6” mold
  • 7. 4. Plot the Data 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 Penetration (inches) Load on Piston (psi)
  • 8. 5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2 penetration. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 Penetration (inches) Load on Piston (psi) “The Gold Standard” for CBR for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 1500 psi Example above: for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi The standard material for this test is crushed California limestone
  • 9. 5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2 penetration. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 Penetration (inches) Load on Piston (psi) “The Gold Standard” for CBR for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi Example above: for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi Example psi = CBR Standard psi 220 psi = .22, or 22% 1000 psi 300 psi = .20, or 20% 1500 psi CBR of material = 22%
  • 10. 5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2 penetration. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 Penetration (inches) Load on Piston (psi) “The Gold Standard” for CBR for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi Example above: for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi Example psi = CBR Standard psi 220 psi = .22, or 22% 1000 psi 300 psi = .20, or 20% 1500 psi CBR of material = 22% Use 0.1” of penetration, unless 0.2” is the greater value. •If so, then rerun the test, taking the higher of the two values from this second trial
  • 11. 5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2 penetration. “The Gold Standard” for CBR for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi Example above: for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi Example psi = CBR Standard psi 220 psi = .22, or 22% 1000 psi 300 psi = .20, or 20% 1500 psi CBR of material = 22%, or “22” In General: •The harder the surface, the higher the CBR rating. •A CBR of 3 equates to tilled farmland, •A CBR of 4.75 equates to turf or moist clay, •Moist sand may have a CBR of 10. •High quality crushed rock has a CBR over 80. •The standard material for this test is crushed California limestone which has a value of 100.
  • 12. Potential Corrections to the Stress-Penetration Curves 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 Penetration (inches) Load on Piston (psi)
  • 13. I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 1. Determine • The CBR values of the subgrade • The type of use expected (runways vs. taxiways)
  • 14. I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 1. Determine • The CBR values of the subgrade • The type of use expected (runways vs. taxiways) • The expected wheel load during service • Types of CBR materials available for the construction
  • 15. I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 2. Primary Goals • Total strength of each layer only as good as what is beneath it • Therefore, must meet minimum thickness requirements • “Don’t break the bank” • Use less inexpensive CBR materials when allowed while not shortchanging the project’s integrity
  • 16. I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load)?
  • 17. “ a point on the curve for a given CBR material represents the minimum thickness of pavement courses that will reside above it, in order to maintain stability
  • 18. CBR subbase of 8, Taxiway, and wheel load of 40,000 lb 23 inches “23 inches of total earth material and pavement”
  • 19. I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? 23 inches
  • 20. I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value 15,000 or less 50 15k-40k 65 40k-70k 80 70k-150k 80+ Wearing Surface 0-15k…….....2” >15k-40k…..3” >40k-55k…..4” >55k-70k…..5” >70k……..…6”
  • 21. I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value 15,000 or less 50 >15k-40k 65 >40k-70k 80 >70k-150k 80+ Wearing Surface 0-15k…….....2” >15k-40k…..3” >40k-55k…..4” >55k-70k…..5” >70k……..…6” 23 inches 3 inches 6 inches of CBR 65/80
  • 22. V. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value 15,000 or less 50 >15k-40k 65 >40k-70k 80 >70k-150k 80+ Wearing Surface 0-15k…….....2” >15k-40k…..3” >40k-55k…..4” >55k-70k…..5” >70k……..…6” 23 inches 3 inches 6 inches of CBR 65/80 CBR = 80 3” 6”
  • 23. V. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? What can we use for the remainder of thickness? Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value 15,000 or less 50 >15k-40k 65 >40k-70k 80 >70k-150k 80+ Wearing Surface 0-15k…….....2” >15k-40k…..3” >40k-55k…..4” >55k-70k…..5” >70k……..…6” 23 inches 3 inches 6 inches of CBR 65/80 CBR = 80 3” 6”
  • 24. Need = 9” minimum thickness
  • 25. CBR = 27 for remainder of base (14”)
  • 26. Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs
  • 27. Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9” of pavement courses above it.
  • 28. Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9” of pavement courses above it.
  • 29. Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” 14” of CBR 30 CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9” of pavement courses above it.
  • 30. Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs
  • 31. Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”
  • 32. Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” A CBR of 15 requires X” above it
  • 33. Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it
  • 34. Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it A CBR of 30 requires X” above it
  • 35. Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it A CBR of 30 requires 9” above it