4. Overview and Agenda
National Data Role of Pretrial Law Enforcement
Exercise Legal Overview
Review Services Perspective
5. Pretrial Stage of the Criminal
Justice System
The period of time between arrest/citation and case
adjudication is known as the pretrial stage. During this stage
defendants enjoy certain inalienable rights as found in law.
Legal rights that apply during the pretrial stage can be found
in the Constitution of the United States, case law, and state
and federal statutes.
6. Legal and Constitutional Rights
1. Presumption of
Innocence
2. Right to Counsel
3. Right Against Self-
incrimination
4. Right to Due
Process of Law
5. Right to Equal
Protection Under the
Law
6. Right to Bail that is
Not Excessive
7. Presumption of Release
Unless a judicial official determines otherwise, it is
presumed that the defendant will be released
under one of the following conditions:
Written Promise to Appear
Unsecured Appearance Bond
Custody of a Designated Person
Secure Bond
House Arrest with Electronic Monitoring
N.C.G.S 15A-534(b)
8. Overview and Agenda
National Data Role of Pretrial Law Enforcement
Exercise Legal Overview
Review Services Perspective
9. Growth in County Jail
Populations
Jail Population: 1982-2007
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Bureau of Justice Statistics: Annual Survey
of Jails
12. Growth in County Expenditures for
Jails
County Jail Expenditures: 1982-2007
30000000
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Bureau of Justice Statistics: Justice Expenditures and Employment in the United States
13. Jail Populations In Era of
Economic Downturn
Jail Population: 2005-2011
790000
780000
770000
760000
750000
740000
730000
720000
710000
700000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Bureau of Justice Statistics: Annual Survey of Jails
14. Changing Characteristics of Jail
Populations
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
Pretrial Detainee Population on June
30
100,000
0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2009 2010
Bureau of Justice Statistics: Annual Survey of Jails
15. Overview and Agenda
National Data Role of Pretrial Law Enforcement
Exercise Legal Overview
Review Services Perspective
16. PRETRIAL SERVICES
FUNCTIONS
The National Association of Counties and the
American Bar Association say that all counties
should provide for several functions to
facilitate pretrial justice, including:
Gathering information on all defendants who are
in custody awaiting a bail setting
hearing, including conducting a risk assessment.
Supervising defendants on pretrial release and
reminding them of their upcoming court dates.
17. Gathering Information
What is involved: Interviewing defendants for
information about their residence and
employment status, verifying the information
provided, doing criminal history record
checks, and conducting an individual
assessment of risk each defendant poses in
terms of:
Riskof flight
Danger to the community
18. Benefits
Economic benefits: Judicial officers have the
information they need to make informed
decisions regarding pretrial release, meaning
they are much more likely to order
release, thus reducing jail costs.
Mecklenburg County, NC saw a 32% increase in
non-financial bonds after the implementation of a
revised bail policy and evidence based risk
assessment with NO statistically significant
increase in failure rates.
19. Supervision
What is involved: Actively monitoring
conditions of pretrial release imposed by the
court. Conditions can include: reporting in on
a regular basis, either by phone or in
person, drug or alcohol testing, and electronic
monitoring.
20. Number of Defendants Admitted to Pretrial in North
Carolina
18,000
15,890 15,521
16,000
14,746
14,000
12,000
10,000
7,776
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10
North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission: Compendium of Community Corrections Programs
in North Carolina
21. Success Rates in North
Carolina
86%
85%
85%
84%
83%
82%
81%
80%
80%
79% 79%
79%
78%
77%
76%
FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10
North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission: Compendium of Community Corrections
Programs in North Carolina
22. Mecklenburg County Comparison of Pretrial
and Secured Bond Success Rates
FY 10
82
85
80
75 70
70 Pretrial
65
Secure Bond
60
FY 10
Pretrial
Secure Bond
Mecklenburg County: Bail Policy Review
23. Benefits
Economic benefits: Defendants can be safely
monitored in the community at a fraction of the
cost of keeping them in jail. Savings can be
used to fund other areas.
24. North Carolina Pretrial Cost Per Day/Per
Participant
$70.00
$60.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$0.00
FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY10 FY 11
Program Cost/Day Jail Cost/Day Adjusted Jail Cost/Day
North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission: Compendium of Community Corrections
Programs in North Carolina
25. Name That Savings
In FY 11, what was the cost benefit of Pretrial
Services in North Carolina?
$1,359,209
26. Overview and Agenda
Law
Legal National Data Role of Pretrial
Exercise Enforcement
Overview Review Services
Perspective
28. Conclusion/Next Steps
Government officials should look upon the use
of jail beds the same as the health industry
looks at the use of hospital beds – given the
huge expense, as a last resort, only when all
other less expensive options will not suffice.
Consider utilizing other release means where
appropriate.
29. Contact Information
Chief Kenneth Miller, Greensboro Police
Department
Ken.Miller@greensboro-nc.gov
Raina Holliday, Pretrial Services
Director, Rockingham County
rholliday@co.rockingham.nc.us
Jessica Ireland, Program Manager, Mecklenburg
County Pretrial Services.
Jessica.Ireland@MecklenburgCountyNC.gov
Editor's Notes
Ice breakers. Ask how many people in the room work in jurisdictions that have Pretrial programs. Get a feel for why people are there, what do they hope to learn.
Walk participants thru a real life case and have a brief discussion regarding if they would release or detain, and reasons behind decision. Make the point that hopefully this presentation will highlight “win win” strategies where Counties utilize the concept of smart detention safe release to promote public safety and save money.
Let’s begin by looking at some data showing what has been going on in this country regarding jail populations and jail costs. As this chart shows, there was a steady growth in jail populations nationwide in the 25-year period between 1982 and 2007, going from around 200,000 to nearly 800,000.
During much of the period when jail populations were rising, crime rates were going down. This chart shows that the rate of violent crime has gone down from nearly 700 per 100,000 population in 1995 to 400 per 100,000 in 2010.
Likewise, the property crime rate has gone down as well.
This chart shows how county jail costs rose over that same 25-year period, tripling from 1982 to 2007, making the construction and operation of jails one of the most expensive items in county government budgets.
It was in 2008 that the current economic downturn began. This chart shows that the jail population reached its peak in 2008 and has been steadily declining since– possible indications that counties are realizing that they can no longer economically sustain such high jail populations.
Up until about 1996, the pretrial and sentenced populations in the jail were about even. Since then, the pretrial population has grown at a much greater pace, and now make up about 60 percent of jail populations. Thus, the pretrial population is a big target when thinking about how to reduce the overall jail population which in turn will result in cost savings for counties.
BothNaco and the ABA are supporters of Pretrial Services and advocate for their use in all counties.
An information gathering process is used in many areas, including health care, to triage cases to identify those that can be dealt with in the least restrictive and least expensive way, When it comes to gathering information on persons who have been arrested, unfortunately, the model in place in many jurisdictions is to treat every case in the most restrictive and most expensive way (i.e., put them in a jail bed) and then determine later if it might be possible to treat them differently.
As you can see, using a evidenced based risk assessment that takes into account risk of flight and danger to the community can substantially free up jail space with no impact to the community. It’s important to state that NO tool is perfect and it is unreasonable to expect that failures will not happen, they will. Now let’s actually take a look at the risk assessment used by Mecklenburg and Rockingham.
Success rate is defined as the rate at which defendants reach final resolution of his/her case and do not have their pretrial status revoked due to committing a new offense while on pretrial release, a violation of conditions of release, or a failure to appear in court. As shown above, the statewide average has ranged from 79% in FY 08 to 85% in FY 10.
The important point to make here is that money does not make a defendant a safe release. There is NO evidence that posting a secure bond deters you from committing future criminal activity. I think the data in Mecklenburg County helps to further this point.
Simply put, the goal should be “smart detention safe release.” Limited and costly jail space should be used for defendants that present a great risk of flight or danger to the community.
To more accurately reflect the true jail costs, an adjusted jail cost was estimated using the jailer reported cost multiplied by one third. This estimate is used to account for fixed costs such as food, medical expenses, utilities, or other jail operating costs that will not change unless a section of the jail can be closed that results in staff or other overhead reductions. If using the adjusted jail cost as the comparison measure, release on pretrial is nearly three times less expensive than jail detention. Pretrial Services is clearly a more efficient use of tax dollars.
Although savings vary from county to county, Statewide there was over 1.3 million dollars saved in FY 11. Keep in mind this is based on only 30 Pretrial agencies.