The cheese has moved.9.21.11


Published on


Published in: Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Live Long and Proper
  • These percentages were taken from the OPAAGA Study. We believe the completion rate could be higher than the 50% found in the study.
  • $32 million is defined as $20,000 x 1,600 persons we save
  • 7,473 Total Sent to Florida prisons
  • SB2714
  • The cheese has moved.9.21.11

    1. 1. Who Moved The ?Transforming the JusticeSystem
    2. 2. A Short History of Florida’s DrugCourts• Established in 1989 in Dade County• Replicated in Broward County in 1991• Became Mandatory for each Circuit in 2000• Became Voluntary in 2006 after Art. V, Rev. 7• Expanded by Stimulus Dollars and Legislative Initiative in 2009• Glitch Bill 2011• Perhaps Reentry in 2012
    3. 3. ARTICLE V Revision 7• Deleted the state mandate of a drug court in each circuit• Added option of a drug court in each county• HOWEVER, included drug court coordinators in case management – essential to the courts
    4. 4. The Growth of Drug Courts120 112110 108 102100 92 8990 7980 697060 5550 4240 32 3430 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
    5. 5. Senate Bill 1726 (2009)• Lists factors to be Considered in Placement of Offenders in Post-adjudicatory Drug Court ▫ Assessment of Defendant’s Criminal History ▫ Substance Abuse Screening Outcome ▫ Amenability to the Services of Program ▫ Total Sentencing Points ▫ Recommendation of the Prosecutor & Victim, if any ▫ Defendant’s Agreement to Enter Program
    6. 6. Eligibility• Non-violent third degree felony or any other felony offense that is not a forcible felony as defined in section 776.08• 52 Points or Less• Substance Abuse Disorder• Probation Violation
    7. 7. Expansion of Pre-Trial Drug Court Non-violent third degree felony or any other felony offense that is not a forcible felony as defined in section 776.08 Identified as Having Substance Abuse Problem No Prior Felony Conviction Deleted Prior PTI Admission as an Exclusion
    8. 8. Expansion of DrugOffender ProbationAdded non-violent third degree felony under chapter 810 or any other felony offense that is not a forcible felony as defined in section 776.08 with 52 Points or less
    9. 9. FUNDING $825,000 to OSCA for data collection $175,000 to OSCA for administration and data collection $750,000 to Public Defenders for Expansion $1.5 million to State Attorneys for Expansion $17,633,222 for treatment, case management, and drug testing ◦ All Stimulus Dollars
    10. 10. GOAL• Provide the State with 5 to 1+ return on its investment of $20,883,223 ▫ Target 4,000 non-violent, third-degree or other non-forcible felony offenders with scores of 52 or less for post-adjudicatory drug courts ▫ Anticipate 2,000 successful completions (a 50% failure rate as indicated by the OPPAGA study) ▫ Anticipate 1,600 successful completers will not reenter Florida’s prison system (80 % success as indicated by the OPPAGA study)
    11. 11. 5:1+ RETURN ON INVESTMENT Reduce prison building by $100 million = one prison (1,200 offenders) 1,600 offenders diverted from prison Plus yearly operational costs of $32 million over multiple years BONUS: Enhanced Public Safety by Reduction in Recidivism and associated costs
    12. 12. MEANS TO THE ENDPrioritize the nine counties that send the most offenders in the targeted population to Florida prisons: 2. Hillsborough 1,224 3. Duval 1,170 4. Broward 995 5. Polk 874 6. Pinellas 768 7. Orange 720 8. Marion 631 9. Volusia 585 10. Escambia 506
    13. 13. BASELINE TREATMENT AND DRUGTESTING COSTS $3,500 per offender This baseline takes into account: › Not all offenders will need the same amount of treatment › Minimum of 50% of targeted offenders will complete treatment › Offenders will contribute to treatment costs › Communities will contribute to overall services
    14. 14. TOTALS – Annual and Two YearProjection Treatment and Drug Testing $ 7,000,000 Case Management – Supervision 750,139 Case Management – Courts 665,477 Indirect Costs (Counties/OSCA) 387,729 Travel and Administrative Costs 13,366TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSE 8,816,611 Two Year Projection $17,633,222 Statewide Data System $1,000,000 Development
    15. 15. Expansion Admissions• As of early September 13, 2011, 1,160 are participating in the expansion programs.• Hillsborough and Broward lead the admissions.• Broward has had 259 admissions with 41 terminations, which leads the State in overall participation• Hillsborough leads the State in successful completions• All Good News
    16. 16. Challenges: Enter the Glitch Bill Confusion with new post-adjudicatory eligibility criteria Eligibility criteria is too restrictive ◦ Increase eligibility criteria to all technical violations of probation rather than limiting them to just failed drug test violations ◦ Consider increasing sentencing point threshold above 60 points
    17. 17. 2011 Glitch Bill• Clarify eligibility criteria for post-adjudicatory drug court programs.• Expand criteria to allow more non-violent offenders to participate.• This was all accomplished with 2011 legislation championed by Rep. Rousson. All recommendations for expanding eligibility was accomplished.
    18. 18. SUCCESS: This an opportunity fordrug courts and substance abusetreatment to stake its claim. ▫ Enhance Public Safety ▫ Reduce Recidivism ▫ Save $100M+ Dollars ▫ Restore Productive Citizens
    19. 19. Drug CourtReentry Program▫ The DOC will identify eligible offenders convicted of non-violent third degree felonies.▫ After the offender has completed at least one half of his prison sentence, the DOC will recommend the offender’s participation to the sentencing judge.▫ The State has the opportunity to object.▫ If accepted, the offender will participate in the in- custody reentry program for 120 days.▫ Upon successful completion, the sentencing judge will modify the offender’s sentence to drug offender probation.
    20. 20. • The offender will step-down into an appropriate community-based treatment program (work release, residential treatment, half-way house, day treatment, out-patient therapy).• The local drug court will monitor the offender’s participation.• Failure will return the offender to finish the initial sentence with forfeiture of any gain time.
    21. 21. HB 177• Sponsored by Senator Ellyn Bogdonoff and Representative Ari Porth• Previously supported by Tax Watch, Associated Industries of Florida, The Coalition for Smart Justice, FADAA, FADCP, and many other treatment wise groups.• Your support is needed.
    22. 22. WHY?Because of YOU!
    23. 23. The Cheese Has Moved!• Now, I don’t have to explain what a drug court is.• Now, the State wants to know how drug courts can improve the criminal justice system and save dollars.• Now, the OSCA fully supports drug courts.• Now, the Senate Criminal Justice Committee asks for presentations on drug courts.• Now, it’s drug court’s time to shine, but not without pulling its own weight.
    24. 24. A Great Big Thank You!• Without the Commission on Substance Abuse, our drug courts would not exist, could not expand, could not survive!• Without the Commission, Broward County would not lead the State in: Prevention Diversion Intervention Reentry
    25. 25. The Cheese Has Moved!