1. ReGenX Generator Innovation
Regenerative Acceleration
Q&A
Everything you didn’t know about electric generator operation
and didn’t know that you didn’t want to know…

2. Q&A
Regenerative Acceleration ReGenX Generator Innovation
What is it?
The ReGenX innovation is a new electric generator innovation.
What does it do?
The ReGenX innovation reduces the cost of producing electric energy
by more than 80%.
Ya right! Sounds impossible but ok how does it do that?
By eliminating a major source of waste inherit in
all conventional electric generators.
What kind of waste?
80% of the input cost of producing electricity
and the pollution produced in fossil fuel power generation
can be attributed directly to an electromagnetic phenomenon
called Generator Armature Reaction.
What is Generator Armature Reaction?
Generator Armature Reaction is a form of electromagnetic resistance
that is created inside an all electric generators
when they deliver electric current to a load
(such as the grid or an EV’s batteries).
Generator Armature Reaction is colloquially referred to as
regenerative braking in electric vehicles.
The magnetic resistance (Generator Armature Reaction)
is created inside the generator
and is what causes EVs to decelerate
during regenerative braking.
Generator Armature Reaction (EV regenerative braking)
is caused by the magnetic fields that are created
around the current bearing wires that make up the generator coils.

3. It is also why fossil fuel powered electricity generation costs so much financially
in terms of input power and why it cost so much in terms of
environmental pollution.
Generator Armature Reaction is why coal fired power plants in China
are reducing their citizen’s life expectancy by 10 years or more
and why people cannot go outside on some days
or why many people in China have rarely seen a blue sky.
And why we have so much Nuclear Waste.
You mean EV regenerative braking ISN’T the result of the battery being
recharged and work being performed thus requiring more work from the
generator ala Newton’s Third Law and the Law of Conservation of Energy?
Absolutely not.
EV regenerative braking has absolutely NOTHING
to do with the EV’s battery being recharged.
DC voltage and current alone going to a battery
and recharging it cannot decelerate an electric vehicle one iota.
EV regenerative braking / Generator Armature Reaction
is caused by the magnetic fields which are created
around the current bearing wires
that make up the generator coils
inside the generator.
These magnetic fields emanate from the coil windings,
they enter the air gap between the coil and the rotating magnetic field,
and produce a Counter Electromotive Torque
on the generator’s rotating magnetic field
and this counter torque does the work
of decelerating the generators rotor
which decelerates the generator
which decelerates the EV.
The magnitude of the current flowing from the generator to the battery
dictates the magnitude of the magnetic field produced,
the magnitude of the counter torque created,
the magnitude of work being performed
and the rate of EV deceleration.
Generator Armature Reaction Tutorial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAa1s4pN6to

4. So how do Newton’s Third Law and the Law of Conservation of Energy
apply then in electric generator operation?
They do not apply
and never have applied
to explain electric generator operation correctly.
Newton’s Third Law and the Law of Conservation of Energy have been used
to explain electric generator operation incorrectly?
Absolutely.
Why?
Because Newton’s Third Law (Newtonian Mechanics)
never considered or accounted for the creation of magnetic fields
being produced around current bearing wires.
But the end result is the same right?
Not even close.
But Newton’s Third Law states that, “for every action there is an equal and
opposite reaction” Right?
Actually it states,
“When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body
simultaneously
exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.”
Yes that’s what I said!
No you did not.
The reaction must be
simultaneous
to comply with Newton’s Third Law.
Generator Armature Reaction is
not
simultaneous
due to generator core hysteresis which delays the reaction force in the time domain
and an inductor’s 5 time constant rise time which also delays the reaction force
in the time domain.

5. These two time delays invalidate Newton’s Third Law, Lenz’s Law and the Law of
Conservation of Energy for electric generator performance evaluation.
So all the Electrical Engineering text books in the entire world and all
Electricity and Magnetism Physics are incorrect?
Yes.
And everything every electrical engineer and physicist believes about
electric generator operation is wrong?
Yes.
100% completely and utterly wrong.
Good luck convincing anyone.
Are you not convinced yet?
Sort of but I am not an expert on the subject like they are.
They are only experts at being incorrect.
Do you want more correct information on the subject?
Sure why not?
Did you know that both Newton’s 1st
and 2nd
Laws also prohibit
Newton’s Three Laws and the Law of Conservation of Energy
from explaining electric generator operation?
Why is that?
Newton's first law states that,
“ every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion
in a straight line unless compelled to change its state by the action of
an external force.”
The key point here is that if there is no net force acting on an object
(if all the external forces cancel each other out)
then the object will maintain a constant velocity.
If that velocity is zero, then the object remains at rest. If
an external force
is applied, the velocity will change because of the force.

6. The second law explains how the velocity of an object changes when subjected to
an external force.
Do you notice a pattern?
Newton’s Three Laws and the Law of Conservation of Energy only apply in
electric generator operation if external forces are present and they react in
the same time domain.
Absolutely.
Generator Armature Reaction / EV regenerative braking are
not external forces.
They are internal forces
and are self created internally
by the magnetic fields created around the current bearing wires.
Out of thin air, like magic?
Yes just like magic.
And the self created internal reaction forces do not manifest their reaction
simultaneously.
Therefore…
Newton’s Third Law and the Law of Conservation of Energy have never applied
in the explanation of electric generator operation regarding
Generator Armature Reaction and every text book, every teacher and every student
on the planet are applying false science.
Oh is that all?
No there is more.
Ok give me a mathematical example please – perhaps that will help?
For example a 25 kW diesel genset requires a 10 HP motor just to idle on no load.
When that genset is placed on load and delivers 25 kW to the load
it requires an additional 40 HP of motor power
just to overcome the Generator Armature Reaction.
That’s 40 HP of input fuel cost and output pollution cost
which literally goes up in smoke.

7. The ReGenX Generator innovation was developed in the
Power Lab at the University of Ottawa
and has been third party proven multiple times from 2008 – 2010.5
to eliminate (and even reverse) Generator Armature Reaction.
Eliminating Generator Armature Reaction;
eliminates the 40 HP motor requirement
as well as 80% of the input fuel cost
and 80% of the air pollution produced.
Because the ReGenX Generator does not produce Generator Armature Reaction
it does not require the 50 HP diesel engine to deliver 25 kW.
The ReGenX Generator only requires a 10 HP motor to deliver 25 kW.
Delay and Reversing Generator Armature Reaction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnJkC_pD9uo
Hey wait a minute the math doesn’t add up!
Why not?
Because 1 HP = 745.7 Watts therefore 25 kW requires a minimum of 33.5
HP. Right?
Yes that is true
But only IF your generator produces Generator Armature Reaction
and
No if it does not produce Generator Armature Reaction.
For example:
10 HP = 7457 Watts (at idle on no load).
+ 40 HP (29,828 Watts) on load due to Generator Armature Reaction
which is created by the generator itself
and that = 37,285 Watts or 50 HP

8. All conventional 25kW generators require 29,828 Watts
of additional mechanical input power when placed on load
simply to overcome the 29,285 Watts of (parasitic) mechanical power
called Generator Armature Reaction which is created by the generator itself,
inside the generator around the current bearing wires.
When you remove the parasitic Generator Armature Reaction from the equation
7457 Watts of input power is all that is required to deliver 25 kW of output power.
7457 Watts of mechanical input power to generate 25,000 Watts of
electrical output power?
Yes
Impossible! That is 335% overunity! Honey bring me my tinfoil hat!
Are you aware that all conventional generators operate at overunity.
Not true!
All conventional generators are less than 100% efficient.
How do you know that?
Because I read it in a book somewhere and my teacher told me because he
read it in a book somewhere… so it must be true. Right?
Like Newton’s Three Laws and the Law of Conservation of Energy?
Um yes!
Wrong.
All conventional generators are
less
than 100% efficient
at converting mechanical input power to electrical output power
but that’s not all they do…

9. All electric generators are 100% efficient
at converting mechanical input power
to electrical output power,
heat, noise and vibration.
Ok fine but we don’t count the heat etc. produced since it is all considered
waste. We only care about the electrical power output.
What about the energy that is created – you don’t care about that either?
Energy that is created?
Yes
Energy can’t be created! It can only be converted from one form to
another!
Are you sure and if so how do you know that?
Because I read it in a book somewhere and my teacher told me because he
read it in a book somewhere… so it must be true. Right?
Yes it is true
but
only
IF you ignore Generator Armature Reaction
and if you include Generator Armature Reaction
then it is false.
So in reality it is false.
But Generator Armature Reaction isn’t energy!
True but Generator Armature Reaction IS work
and all work in any direction requires energy.
Generator Armature Reaction is a Counter Electromotive Torque
produced inside all electric generators by the magnetic fields
created around the generator coils’ current bearing wires.
And all torque (in any direction) is work.

10. And the Work Energy Principle states that,
“all work requires energy”
So the current bearing wires inside the generator produce magnetic fields
which are a form of energy?
Yes
And they produce a Counter Electromotive Torque which does work?
Yes
A Counter Electromotive Torque which is a form of work called Generator
Armature Reaction which occurs when current flows from the generator to
the load?
Yes
And all electric generators create this energy because they perform this
work?
Yes
And all electric generators are over 100% efficient because they all create
Generator Armature Reaction during the conversion process from
mechanical input power to electrical output power and this (magnetic
field) energy creates a parasitic form of electro-mechanical power which
performs work decelerating the system?
Yes
So energy can be created?
Yes
So the Law of Conservation of Energy is false?
We already established that but yes
however
only as it applies to electromagnetic systems where
magnetic field energy is created.
In purely mechanical systems where magnetic field energy
is not created it is perfectly fine.

11. So why are we killing each other and destroying the Middle East stealing
oil and polluting the environment over a finite dirty recourse like oil when
free and clean magnetic field energy is being created and has always
existed?
Because previously magnetic field energy was purely parasitic in nature
and not available to be tapped into,
harvested used as it is now.
Ok so now magnetic field energy is available to be harvested and electric
generators can operate at 335% overunity but in a beneficial rather than a
parasitic way while creating Regenerative Acceleration?
Well not quite.
OMG do I need my tin foil hat again?
Yes
Ok I’m ready, what else?
An electric generator would be 335% efficient
IF
the output power delivered was say 10 Watts
and
the mechanical input power in the drive shaft increased by 6.65 Watts
over the no load value of 0.00 Watts.
I’m with you so far…
The ReGenX Generator’s mechanical drive shaft power increase isn’t 6.65 Watts
which would be 335% efficient…
Ok got it, I’m starting to feel better actually.
Hang on to seething…
Because the worse case scenario for the ReGenX Generator is when
the mechanical drive shaft power increase is 0.00 Watts,
when placed on load and delivering output power
which represents infinite efficiency.

12. Ok now I’ve had it because that’s impossible and is just crazy talk!
Why?
Nothing can be infinitely efficient!
Why?
Because I read it in a book somewhere and my teacher told me because he
read it in a book somewhere… so it must be true. Right?
Actually it gets worse than that…
I know I’m running out of tin foil for my hats!
Because the ReGenX Generator delivers output power to a load
and the mechanical input power in the drive shaft goes
below
the mechanical input power at idle which is 0.00 Watts
so the efficiency is actually beyond infinite efficiency
if such a number could exist.
The ReGenX Generator operates at beyond infinite efficiency?
Yes
And proves that energy can be created?
That has always been true but yes.
And the Law of Conservation of Energy is wrong?
Not wrong
just incomplete.
Certainly wrongly applied in electromechanical systems.
This all sounds like perpetual motion?
And would that be your rationale for abandoning this dialogue
and rejecting the innovation.
Yes.
Why?

13. Because everyone knows perpetual motion is impossible!
How does everyone know that?
Because we read it in a book somewhere and our teachers told us because
they read it in a book somewhere… so it must be true. Right?
So all physical matter and the entire universe
is impossible then?
No they seem real enough.
Perpetual motion is the basic building block of the entire universe
and all physical matter requires energy in perpetual motion to exist
however
the ReGenX Generator innovation is not synonymous with perpetual motion no
matter how often the media suggest that it is.
Why not?
The same way the Wright Brothers fist air plane wasn’t synonymous
with breaking the sound barrier on its first flight
or flying across the ocean
or all the way to the Moon and back.
These are scientific achievements and scientific facts
which only exist when they are reached scientifically
and scientific fact doesn’t include speculation
or emotionally charged knee jerk reactions.
So perpetual motion is real and it is the basic building block of the universe
and without it all physical matter would not exist?
And without perpetual motion we would not exist or be able to have this
conversation which requires perpetual motion.
Ok fine where did the ReGenX Generator innovation come from?
In 2005 we began researching for ways to reduce Generator Armature Reaction in
order to reduce the cost of generating electricity.
The original intent was a 2 – 10% reduction which seemed reasonable at the time
and within the realm of possibility as far as conventional generator performance
was concerned which was 90% efficient and above.

14. In 2007 it was discovered that Generator Armature Reaction
could actually be reversed and an assistive Complementary Electromotive Torque
could replace the resistive Counter Electromotive Torque.
And you discovered that all electric generators could operate at infinite
efficiency?
No not quite.
What then?
We tried to eliminate the problem.
We tried to get rid of it.
Why would you try to do something dumb like that?
Because it didn’t fit our educated expectations
which put our minds in a box of limited thinking
and we didn’t understand it so we tried to get rid of it.
What educated expectations and limited thinking?
The ones we read it in a book somewhere and our teachers told us because
they read it in a book somewhere… so it must have been true.
So did you get rid of it?
Nope we learned everything we could about it and improved on it as our
comprehension grew.
And then what?
The innovation had to become practical
and commercially manufacturable and viable.
And the science had to be sound.
Evolution of the innovation has taken eight years to reach intellectual property
maturation and the innovation has gone through half a dozen iterations over that
time period.
The innovation's backing theory was developed confidentially in the Ottawa
University Power Lab, a satellite lab provided at the invitation of the University of
Ottawa.
3 US patents have been applied for and are pending.

15. And where is the innovation going?
Now the ReGenX generator manufacturing is identical to the cost of producing
equivalent electric generators and motors. No additional manufacturing costs or
retooling delays apply.
Ongoing technical support has been provided for the past 8 years by a California
generator and energy provider.
Who have recently furnished a request for between 2000 - 3000, 25 KW and 50 KW
ReGenX generators for off grid telecom cell phone towers in Northern California
which represents a $90M US deal.
An international electric machine design and analysis software company has
expressed interest in integrating the ReGenX generator performance into their
machine design and performance analysis software.
A Montreal based electric vehicle manufacturing company, has expressed interest in
providing one of their electric vehicles for ReGenX generator integration.
The ReGenX generator innovation reverses electric vehicle regenerative braking and
introduces electric vehicle Regenerative Acceleration - which allows electric vehicles
to recharge their batteries while driving without the vehicle deceleration effects
associated with conventional electric vehicle regenerative braking, increasing the
electric vehicle's range by more than 300%.
Regenerative Acceleration will reverse the electric vehicle plug-in recharge
paradigm and introduce the Plug-In Discharge paradigm -where electric vehicles
will be uses to provide electric power to the grid or supplemental back-up power.
So are you telling me that all electric vehicles can recharge themselves as
they drive by reversing the EV regenerative braking paradigm because
energy can be created and now harvested in a beneficial rather than just a
parasitic way?
Yes.
By delaying the generators Load Current, thus delaying and reversing
Generator Armature Reaction aka EV regenerative braking and reversing
the counter electromotive torque created in regenerative braking and
producing a complementary electromotive torque and EV regenerative
acceleration?
Yes.

16. And so I won’t need 2000 lbs of batteries to achieve suitable driving range
in my EV or all that battery cost expense?
Yes.
And I won’t need to plug in my EV to recharge it and place additional
burden on the grid or the environment?
Yes.
And all internal combustion engines and all fossil fuels are now obsolete?
Yes.
And by extension Global Warming along with it?
Yes.
And China’s air pollution problem which is killing its people?
Yes.
And all present and future oil wars?
Eventually yes.
Electric vehicles will one day be able to power our homes?
Yes.
And then recharge themselves when driven the next day?
Yes.
If an EV has an electric motor and a suitably sized ReGenX Generator
where the inertia of the EV is enough to overcome generator losses
such as core hysteresis etc.
and the output of the ReGenX Generator in Regenerative Acceleration Mode
is suitably sized such that it matches or exceeds the input power
required to get the EV up to cruising speed and keep the car moving
once up to speed then the EV’s range will be unlimited
and EV battery recharging will be obsolete.
Sounds like perpetual motion and too good to be true – I’m out of here!