WHAT IS A BI-TOROID TRANSFORMER (BiTT)? A Bi-Toroid Transformer is either a Step-up or Step-down Transformer that consumes Pure Reactive Power in the Primary Coil and delivers Real Power to the loads at infinite efficiency from the two Secondary Coils. The Bi-Toroid Transformer employs the same Load Current Time Delay which is inherent in the ReGenX Generator Coil in conjunction with an alternative Low Reluctance Secondary Coil Flux path route. The Secondary Coils' induced Magnetic Flux follows a Lower Reluctance Secondary Flux Path route and it couples electromagnetically into each Secondary Coil, thus Mutually Increasing the Secondary Flux which is required to sustain On-Load Power Delivery across the loads. The Primary Coil's Load Current Timing is out of sync with the Secondary Coils such that: any Secondary Flux that does enter the Primary Core, INCREASES the Primary Coil's IMPEDANCE rather than reducing it and LESS Primary On-Load Current is consumed in the Primary Coil than the Excitation Current which is required On-Load. The Bi-Toroid Transformer Electromagnetically ISOLATES the Source (generator) from the Load. VIDEO 12: <100% EFFICIENCT CONVENTIONAL TRANSFORMER VS INFINITE EFFICIENCY BITT TRANSFORMER: https://youtu.be/ldJNl_5wr78

1. Rob Woudenberg
A BiTTof Flux tuning simulation
Results based on an AC model based on
M45 laminated steel

2. Rob Woudenberg
Flux tuning
04/12/2010
Confidential
2
 Basic FEMM model used is 5.5 x 5.5 x 3.3
cm:

3. Rob Woudenberg
Applied Input / output signals
 FEMM input parameters can only be current
 Primary current phase (red curve)is fixed
 Secondary current phase (blue curve) is changed from 0 to
359 degrees in steps of one degree to find unique situations
 Applied current values: 0.2 – 1.2 Amps
04/12/2010
Confidential
3

4. Rob Woudenberg
Cop vs phase findings (1)
04/12/2010
Confidential
4
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1
8
4
1
8
8
1
9
2
1
9
6
2
0
0
2
0
4
2
0
8
2
1
2
2
1
6
2
2
0
2
2
4
2
2
8
2
3
2
2
3
6
2
4
0
2
4
4
2
4
8
2
5
2
2
5
6
2
6
0
2
6
4
2
6
8
2
7
2
2
7
6
2
8
0
2
8
4
2
8
8
2
9
2
2
9
6
3
0
0
3
0
4
3
0
8
3
1
2
3
1
6
3
2
0
3
2
4
3
2
8
3
3
2
3
3
6
3
4
0
3
4
4
3
4
8
3
5
2
3
5
6
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
t
o
t
a
l
W
a
t
t
Primarypower
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.05
1.075
1.1
1.2

5. Rob Woudenberg
Cop vs phase (2)
04/12/2010
Confidential
5
 At low currents two COP peaks occur over the 180 – 359
range
 The lower the current the wider the COP peaks are apart
 At higher currents the two COP peaks merge at around 270
degrees
 Further fine tuning on current value will give one COP >>
100000 at 270 degrees @ I=1.075 A in this simulation
≈
0
5 0
1 0 0
1 5 0
2 0 0
2 5 0
1
8
0
1
8
4
1
8
8
1
9
2
1
9
6
2
0
0
2
0
4
2
0
8
2
1
2
2
1
6
2
2
0
2
2
4
2
2
8
2
3
2
2
3
6
2
4
0
2
4
4
2
4
8
2
5
2
2
5
6
2
6
0
2
6
4
2
6
8
2
7
2
2
7
6
2
8
0
2
8
4
2
8
8
2
9
2
2
9
6
3
0
0
3
0
4
3
0
8
3
1
2
3
1
6
3
2
0
3
2
4
3
2
8
3
3
2
3
3
6
3
4
0
3
4
4
3
4
8
3
5
2
3
5
6
3
6
0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1
1 .0 5
1 .0 7 5
1 .1
1 .2

6. Rob Woudenberg
Power factor vs phase
04/12/2010
Confidential
6
 Power factor obtains it’s minimum around the 270 phase
difference area
 Power factor can be positive or negative
 PF = 0 270 degrees @ I=1.075 A in this simulation
≈

7. Rob Woudenberg
Secondary Voltage vs current phase
 Load is aimed to be pure resistant.
 Phase between V and I of secondary coils is 0 degrees at
270 degrees @ I=1.075 A in this simulation
04/12/2010
Confidential
7
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
1
8
4
1
8
8
1
9
2
1
9
6
2
0
0
2
0
4
2
0
8
2
1
2
2
1
6
2
2
0
2
2
4
2
2
8
2
3
2
2
3
6
2
4
0
2
4
4
2
4
8
2
5
2
2
5
6
2
6
0
2
6
4
2
6
8
2
7
2
2
7
6
2
8
0
2
8
4
2
8
8
2
9
2
2
9
6
3
0
0
3
0
4
3
0
8
3
1
2
3
1
6
3
2
0
3
2
4
3
2
8
3
3
2
3
3
6
3
4
0
3
4
4
3
4
8
3
5
2
3
5
6
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.05
1.075
1.1
1.2

8. Rob Woudenberg
Real Power overview (1)
 Real input power:
04/12/2010
Confidential
8
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1
8
4
1
8
8
1
9
2
1
9
6
2
0
0
2
0
4
2
0
8
2
1
2
2
1
6
2
2
0
2
2
4
2
2
8
2
3
2
2
3
6
2
4
0
2
4
4
2
4
8
2
5
2
2
5
6
2
6
0
2
6
4
2
6
8
2
7
2
2
7
6
2
8
0
2
8
4
2
8
8
2
9
2
2
9
6
3
0
0
3
0
4
3
0
8
3
1
2
3
1
6
3
2
0
3
2
4
3
2
8
3
3
2
3
3
6
3
4
0
3
4
4
3
4
8
3
5
2
3
5
6
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
t
o
t
a
l
W
a
t
t
Primarypower
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.05
1.075
1.1
1.2

9. Rob Woudenberg
ReaL Power overview (2)
 Real output power:
04/12/2010
Confidential
9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1
8
4
1
8
8
1
9
2
1
9
6
2
0
0
2
0
4
2
0
8
2
1
2
2
1
6
2
2
0
2
2
4
2
2
8
2
3
2
2
3
6
2
4
0
2
4
4
2
4
8
2
5
2
2
5
6
2
6
0
2
6
4
2
6
8
2
7
2
2
7
6
2
8
0
2
8
4
2
8
8
2
9
2
2
9
6
3
0
0
3
0
4
3
0
8
3
1
2
3
1
6
3
2
0
3
2
4
3
2
8
3
3
2
3
3
6
3
4
0
3
4
4
3
4
8
3
5
2
3
5
6
S
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
t
o
t
a
l
W
a
t
t
Secondary power
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.05
1.075
1.1
1.2

10. Rob Woudenberg
General observations and conclusions
 Unique COP values appear at various input output current phase differences
 Some of these COP situations can never happen because of impossible load impedance causing
phase differences > 90 degrees
 At 270 degrees input / output phase difference COP > 1 situations occur where voltage
and current phase differences of the secondary coils are zero. This is corresponding a
pure resistive load
 The 270 degrees point can be explained as follows:
 Polarity of Iin and Iout definitions are 180 degrees different in the circuit model
 The additional 90 degrees is cause by the transition of signals from primary to secondary:
 Ip→p Vs Is ,current to flux to voltage to current.
→ →
 The voltage to current occurs in an induction that causes 90 degrees phase difference
04/12/2010
Confidential
10
BiTT
Iin Iout