Το Ιράν των Αγιατολάχ: ένα Μασωνικό Παρασκεύασμα - αποκαλύπτει ο Έλληνας Ιρανολόγος καθ. Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης Ayatollahs' Iran: A Freemasonic Fabrication, reveals the Greek Iranologist Prof. Mohammad Samsaddin Megalommatis ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ” Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 27η Σεπτεμβρίου 2018.

1. Το Ιράν των
Αγιατολάχ: ένα
Μασωνικό
Παρασκεύασμα -
αποκαλύπτει ο
Έλληνας Ιρανολόγος
καθ. Μουχάμαντ
Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμά
της
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/0
9/27/το-ιράν-των-αγιατολάχ-ένα-μασωνικό-
παρ/
=============================

2. Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής –
Greeks of the Orient
Ρωμιοσύνη,Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή
Αυτοκρατορία
Αναδημοσιεύω εδώ ένα εντυπωσιακό άρθρο
του Έλληνα ανατολιστή ιστορικού και
πολιτικού επιστήμονα, καθ. Μουχάμαντ
Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτη, ο οποίος διαλύει
πολλούς μύθους που υπάρχουν στην κοινή
γνώμη σχετικά με το Ιράν ως τάχα
‘αντίπαλο’ της δυτικής Νέας Τάξης
Πραγμάτων.
Αρχικά δημοσιευμένο το 2007, το
ανατρεπτικό άρθρο αναδημοσιεύθηκε σε
πολλά ιρανικά πόρταλς της Διασποράς
επειδή οι Ιρανοί κατάλαβαν εύκολα το τι
έλεγε για την χώρα τους ο εξαίρετος
Έλληνας ιρανολόγος, ο οποίος έχει μελετήσει
την ιστορία του Ιράν και έχει περιπλανηθεί
στην χώρα εκείνη όσο ελάχιστοι άλλοι
ειδικοί.

3. Ayatollahs’ Iran: a
Nationalistic
Theocracy as
Freemasonic
Machination
By M. Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Saturday 22 December 2007

4. http://www.fravahr.org/spip.php?article4
11
and
https://www.academia.edu/24267250/Ay
atollahs_Iran_a_Nationalistic_Theocracy_as
_Freemasonic_Machination
======================
The current theocratic and utterly
unrepresentative regime of Iran was not
the choice of the peoples and nations of
Iran. The events that triggered the fall of
Shah and the return of Ayatollah
Khomeini were all machinated by an
Apostate Freemasonic Lodge that controls
part of the French and the English
establishments and through them part of
the American establishment.
The danger that the late Shah of Iran
represented for their eschatological plans
was absolutely tremendous. This does not
imply that they intended to help
establish a pseudo-Shia theocracy in

5. Iran; simply they were not able to
completely control the developments. As a
matter of fact, the late Shah intended to
modernize, industrialize and westernize
Iran in the 70s; one could compare his
attempt to that of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
in Turkey, 50 years earlier.
A strong Iran next to a strong Turkey is
enough to make the Anglo-French
colonial establishments spend years
without an easy sleep. Although this
would look good for Western geo-political
and geo-strategic interests, particularly in
containing Tsarist Russia / USSR /
Putin’s oligarchy, in real terms of Western
Freemasonic conspiracy in the Middle
East it is abominable because it would
hinder all Freemasonic plans and projects
for the Middle East, the area of their
primary concern par excellence.

6. Mossadegh received by Truman
Mossadegh was a Freemason Islamist. His
supporters became later the supporters of
Khomeyni and founders of the Islamic
regime.
It sounds awkward but it is absolutely
real: the late Shah of Iran tried with a
delay of 17 years (as of 1970) to
implement the basic concepts of the
Iranian nationalistic policies of Dr.
Mohammed Mossadegh, a great Iranian
statesman whom the Freemasonic mass
media of the West did their ingenious best
to defame and ridicule, while falsely

7. portraying him as … related to the
Iranian Communist party!
[In fact, Mohamad Mossadegh was himself
a Freemason and an Islamist. His so-
called nationalism was no more than an
International-Islamism inspired by
Freemasonry — Fravahr]
When Madeleine Albright, decades later,
admitted that the Eisenhower
administration was involved in the
Operation Ajax that ended with the
Mossadegh’s removal, she did not state any
other reason except geopolitical
considerations. In fact, these
considerations were Freemasonic
eschatological approaches to the Middle
East, covered by English economic
interests, and involved volumes of
falsified information produced in order to
mislead the gullible and deeply unaware
American establishment — through use of
pro-English agents who were active in
Washington D.C.

8. The Shah himself must have felt in the
early and mid 70s how right Mohammed
Mossadegh was. In his last days in
Tehran, the Shah must have also
remembered his father’s last days in the
throne, when in September 1941 the
English had forced him to abdicate in
favour of his young son, as they could not
accept Iran’s neutrality in WW II.
The Freemasonic anti-Iranian conspiracy
played on the Iranian peoples’ feelings
against the Shah, and involved the return
of Ayatollah Khomeini who had spent
some months in France. In fact, the
Apostate Freemasonic Lodge pushed to the
political forefront Iranians who had
already lived and studied in France
where they had become Freemasons, like
Mehdi Bazargan, Khomeini’s first Prime
Minister, and Abolhassan Banisadr, the
first Iranian President.
They were joined in their effort to
canalize the Iranian Revolution by

9. Sadegh Ghotbzadeh, who had studied in
America, and had travelled with
Ayatollah Khomeini from Paris to Tehran
on February 1st 1979 to become later
Foreign Minister (after Banisadr) and
then be arrested and executed (September
1982) as betrayed by President George H.
W. Bush. After 1983, Freemasonic
influence on Iranian policies has been
indirect.
Indirect manipulation involves the
mental, spiritual, philosophical,
ideological, and therefore political
engulfment of the targeted establishment
into erroneous perception of the present
realities and the future targets of the
Apostate Freemasonic Lodge within a
context that can be rather parallelized
with an iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma.
Shia Eschatology in contrast with
Freemasonic Messianism

10. Worship of Isis
Freemasonic ritual as on the walls of the
Isiac Freemasonic Lodge (Temple of Isis) at
Pompeii
The worship of Isis is depicted in this
wall-painting from Herculaneum. The
high priest stands at the entrance to the
temple and looks down on the ceremony
beneath him, which is supervised by
priests with shaven heads. In the case of
the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the
Freemasonic establishment’s arsenal
reaches its limits. Drawing from a late
Sassanid Zervanism that survived within
Shia Islam since the early days of the

11. Islamic conquest of Iran (636: Sassanid
defeat at Qadisiyah, 641 Sassanid defeat
at Nihavent, 651: arrival of Islamic
armies at Merv in Central Asia), Shia
Eschatology revolves around the
prevalence of Time as determinant
element in the Mystic History of the
Mankind; this is utterly alien to Western
Freemasonic dogmas and doctrines that
draw from Late Antiquity’s Gnosticisms,
Hermetism, and Messianic Isidism.
With Khomeini’s doctrine based on the
termination of the Ghaybah
(“Occultation”) of the Shia Islamic
Twelfth Imam (the Shia version of the
Messiah) by means of the Islamic
Republic of Iran, we reach one step closer
to what is called in Islam Al Yom al Ahar
(“the End of Time”).
Despite the fact that Iran and most of the
Islamic World are engulfed in ignorance
and confusion due to the academic
systems that Freemasonic Europe produced

12. to facilitate the advent of the Freemasonic
Messianic, namely the Hellenism, the
Orientalism, the Pan-Arabism, and the
(Sunni) Islamism, the Shia establishment
of Iran, sticking to the completion of the
work initiated by Ayatollah Khomeini,
have little chance to be misguided and
deceived.
Contrarily to the Freemasonic concept of a
Horus — Messiah, creation of Isis (as
Freemasonry is symbolized within the
Freemasonic eschatological doctrine), a
Zervan — Twelfth Imam hinges on the
absorption of all into a New Aeon with
little concern about an Elected People to
be saved.
Contrarily to a Horus — Victorious King
and Pacifier, the concept of Zervan —
Twelfth Imam involves the liberation of
every person from the negative energy
therein encrusted through various ways;
as Zervan Akarana promises a monstrous
appearance, yet able to embody the

13. Loftiest of the Divine, the Shia Islamic
Twelfth Imam promises no peace and no
return for any elected people, but heralds
the miraculous transformation of the
miserable into luminous sources in the
present world (after Al Yom al Ahar) and
the Hereafter (Al Yom al Qiyamah).
There is certainly a Manichaean
influence on the late Sassanid Zervanism
(and through this system on the Shia
Islam) but the Western stern rejection of
Manichaeism proliferated only confusion
and dire practices among the Apostate
Freemasons. In fact, the Freemasonic
Apostasy is a repetition of an earlier
Apostasy that took place in the Late
Antiquity, and caused the disastrous
descent into the Middle Ages.
Unable to transcend, the Apostate
Freemasonic Lodge seems set for disastrous
developments that will now cover the
entire surface of the Earth. Determined to
continue an evil process started by

14. Napoleon and sped up by Edmund
Allenby, the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge
seems today unable to perceive the
impending domino effect that will ensue
from an attack on Iran. The Apostate
Lodge machinated the Anglo-French
colonialism in order to create a false and
precarious Israel (for Jews, not Israelites),
thus exterminate both Jews and
Palestinians (after a supposed final
peace), and then set up a true Israel able
to accommodate the migrating — because
of expected ominous natural phenomena
— English, Irish, Scots, French, Belgian,
Dutch, and Scandinavians (namely the
true descendants of the Ten Tribes of
Israel). That final Israel that would span
between the rivers Euphrates (Assyria)
and Nile (Egypt) may simply never come
to existence because of the rise of a New
Era for the Middle East triggered by an
attack on Iran.
The Advent of the End of Time

15. If Ahmadinejad referred to Mahdi’s
advent (which means automatically the
End of Time) already in his first speech
at the UN (in September 2005), what
happened meanwhile that indicates that
by now an apocalyptic scenario would
follow an American attack on Iran? Why
what could happen in March 2006
should not occur in December 2007?
The answer to such a question is at the
same time a full response to a great
number of eschatological interpretations.
The History of the Mankind can also be
viewed as a History of missed
opportunities. More recently, after 2001,
to give an example, the US could have
pacified Iraq, if they had the knowledge
and the courage to do what it would take.
Simply, they were either unaware or
misled. Usually, to know how a solution
can be found to a historical — political
problem, one has to transcend; this
mainly means that one has to see the

16. problem in question as a non-problem, or
place it within wider frame, or view it
through different standpoints, or apply
all these methods. Basically, a historical
— political problem’s solution involves
the non-consideration of a part’s interests.
An answer to the aforementioned question
is at the same time a complete rejection of
numerous approaches to historical texts of
eschatological contents. As a matter of fact,
there has always been a vast
interpretational literature of the
Prophetic books of the Bible, of the
Revelation, of the Apocalyptic Hadith,
and of the eschatological traditions of
various peoples from India to Mexico.
With the inception of the web, and the
rise of spiritual interest in a post-
Communist world, the interpretational
interest only multiplied. Specifications
and clarifications about the time of the
arrival of Mahdi, the Messiah, Jesus as
Islamic Prophet, Jesus as Christ of the

17. Christian religion, etc. can be found in
great number.
All these approaches emanate from a
world plunged into the swamp of Time, a
world whereby all people take for granted
that Time exists. Yet, the Mankind existed
for several thousands of years without
shaping the concept of Time. For many
great thinkers and wise elders in Sumer,
Akkad, Egypt, Assyria and Babylon,
Hittite Anatolia, and Biblical Israel, Time
simply did not exist. The interaction of
Being and Becoming was perceived
completely differently, particularly by
peoples who used the same word for “day”
and “time” (e.g. umu in Assyrian —
Babylonian). In a world viewed,
perceived, sensed, and experienced
diachronically, there is little place for
fanaticism and empathy, as all reflect an
eternal recapitulation of everything.
In that world, great diachronic (and
therefore apocalyptic and eschatological)

18. Epics were compiled for a first and
original occasion, and their elements,
data, concepts and details were later
diffused among later epics, mythical texts
and apocalyptic literature. As a matter of
fact, there is nothing original that was
not already said before Moses. To give an
example, it is sheer ignorance for anyone
to believe that the concept of the
Antichrist goes as back as the Revelation
and Daniel.
More than 1500 years before the
Revelation, for the Anatolian Hittites the
Antichrist (Ullikummi) would rise from
the Sea. The author of the Revelation
reassessed the same topic, adding only an
effort of identification of the Messiah
(Tasmisu for the Ancient Hittites — Jesus
as Christ for the Christians). More than
2000 years before Isaiah, the concept of
the Messiah existed in the Egyptian
Heliopolitan Doctrine.

19. Viewing the present world through the
eyes of an Egyptian, Assyrian or Hittite
erudite scholar would offer a completely
different perspective, and certainly more
authoritative as emanating from a
diachronic consideration of the
Mankind’s and the World’s existence. In
most of the cases, this was avoided
because of the salacity of Western
Orientalists, who instead of serving truth,
did promote preconceived ideas either of
Freemasonic or Christian Catholic nature.
What would destroy pillars of their false
faiths had to be covered by silence; this is
the “veracity” of the Western universities’
professors.
2007: A Changed World and Iran
In fact, many things have changed over
the past 21 months; they are not easily
visible to average people and supposed
leaders. Even worse, it seems that they are
not ostensible to panicked establishments
and elites either.

20. Losing a unique opportunity to be the sole
superpower and thus accomplish the
wishes of the Founding Fathers, the US
will have to become familiar with the
reality of a multi-polar world.
If we exclude the nonsensical nuclear
mutual destruction, which will be always
a possibility, as long as nuclear weapons
exist, America’s interests can be hit at any
moment. America lost considerably
because America allied itself with the
only country they should never work
together: England.
Discrediting America, exposing the US,
while mobilizing others’ forces to contain
America and finally avert a long
perspective Pax Americana, England
convinced the US leadership to pursue the
only way that can truly damage the US
interests: action against the Moral
Principles that the Founding Fathers
stipulated so clearly for the then young
and promising, Anti-Colonial, nation

21. that would diffuse Freedom, Justice and
Democracy to the rest of the world.
The US leadership failed to assess that it
would be detrimental to pursue after
1991 immoral practices employed at the
times of the Cold War. The policy of
double standards (two measures and two
weights) would convince all possible
adversaries that the US represents a
threat, and would mobilize many against
America. The enumeration could be very
long.
Vice-president Cheney’s trip to Saudi
Arabia in November 2006 was certainly
taken very seriously by the Iranians —
within eschatological context, I mean. The
Islamic Messiah will certainly
exterminate a cursed, Satanic regime in
charge of Haramayn, the two holy cities of
Mekka and Madinah.
One would not ask America to believe the
Islamic eschatological literature; but one
would anticipate America to take it into

22. account, and shape its policy accordingly.
The rest is just inane.
Saudi Arabia cannot exist — if Israel is to
survive!
It was a pathetic American effort to
continue English Colonial policies of
division and strife in the Middle East;
these policies targeting the existence of the
Ottoman Empire and Imperial Iran, if
pursued by America, against Turkey and
Iran, can guarantee the total disaster of
America.
Yet, Prof. Huntington, in a moment of
truth, exposed the truth plainly, when he
attributed the Islamic Extremism and
Terrorism to the lack of a core State for
the Muslim world. This was precisely the
work of the Anglo-French Apostate
Freemasonic Lodge that we already
mentioned. America should not be
confused with the Anglo-French
secondary conflicts, as highlighted by the

23. San Remo arguments between Clemenceau
and Lloyd George.
For America’s interests to prevail, for the
present state of Israel to survive, for a
solution of the quasi-permanent
Palestinian problem to be found, America
should avoid any direct interference in
the affairs of the Muslim World.
Any US attack against Iran would trigger
an unexpected and unsuspected reaction
that would certainly have a lot to do with
Islamic eschatological expectations.
The explosion would immediately bring
in other, sizeable, non-Islamic countries
that are ready for a severe collapse of the
present global economic structures, as
their economies are better suited for
barter trade. These countries would not
necessarily help Iran militarily; they
would simply make impossible for
America to sustain the cost of a conflict
spanning from Yemen and Israel to
Afghanistan and Pakistan, at a moment

24. Saudi and Emirati oilfields would not be
anymore functional.
America should keep itself outside the
Muslim World, and following the
instructions of Prof. Huntington, help
(with the cooperation of Israel) the rise of
a core Muslim country in the Middle East
that would eradicate the nefarious
colonial deeds of the Apostate Freemasonic
Lodge.
This country should be a secular and
humanist, democratic country that would
be committed to the elimination of Pan-
Arabism and Islamic Extremism. To
support the rise of a vast Oriental State,
America should fervently oppose France
and England.
This would redraw the map of the Middle
East, but ultimately save the present state
Israel, offer peace to the Palestinians, and
grant concord to the other Middle Eastern
countries. Only a vast Oriental State
would have no problem in containing

25. Iran and outmanoeuvring the Ayatollah
regime.
Otherwise the Death will hit America —
in an irrevocable and precipitated way.
Europe would be affected too; and that
Apostate Freemasonic Lodge would be
severely persecuted in a new —
unrecognizable — Europe ruled by a new
Iron Man of the North.