Fake Freemasons, Ataturk, and the Islamists: Mr. Megalommatis' Terrible Revelations ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ” Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 13η Φεβρουαρίου 2019. ------------------ First republished on 1st October 2021 here: https://profmegalommatistextsingreek.wordpress.com/2021/10/01/οι-ψευτομασώνοι-ο-ατατούρκ-κι-οι-ισλαμ/

1. Οι Ψευτομασώνοι, ο
Ατατούρκ κι οι
Ισλαμιστές: οι
Τρομερές
Αποκαλύψεις του
κ. Μεγαλομμάτη
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2019/0
2/13/οι-ψευτομασώνοι-ο-ατατούρκ-κι-οι-ισλαμ/
===================
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής –
Greeks of the Orient
Ρωμιοσύνη,Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή
Αυτοκρατορία
Στην απάντησή του σε Τούρκο κεμαλιστή
αναγνώστη πρότερου άρθρου του, ο κ.
Μεγαλομμάτης καταγγέλλει την ανομία και

2. τον σατανισμό των φιλο-ισραηλινών και
φιλο-σιωνιστικών ψευτο-στοών και τα
τρομερά προβλήματα που η διαστροφική και
διεστραμμένη δράση τους προξενεί για την
Ανθρωπότητα.
Αναδημοσιεύω εδώ την απάντηση – άρθρο
του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη η οποία δημοσιεύθηκε
αρχικά το 2007 κι αναδημοσιεύθηκε έκτοτε
σε πολλά σάιτς.

4. Ο Ατατούρκ σε βαλς και σε ζεμπέκικο: η
απόλυτη απόρριψη της αποικιοκρατικής,
ψευτομασωνικής, σιωνιστικής,
οριενταλιστικής διάκρισης του κόσμου σε
‘Ανατολή’ και ‘Δύση’. Η ιστορική αλήθεια
οδηγεί στο σβύσιμο και στο κλείσιμο των
γαλλικών ψευτο-πανεπιστημίων: η Αφρο-
Ευρασία είναι Αδιαίρετη. Η δεύτερη

5. φωτογραφία είναι από σκηνή ταινίας. Αλλά
ο Κεμάλ Ατατούρκ ήταν γνωστός για την
συμπάθειά του στον χορό αυτό και η
διάθεσή του αυτή αποτυπώθηκε σε πολλά
αγάλματα που διακόσμησαν πόλεις της
Τουρκίας μετά τον θάνατό του (επειδή
ενόσω ζούσε ο ίδιος, απαγόρευε κάθε
διάσταση προσωπολατρείας).
Freemasonic History,
Apostasy, Kemal
Ataturk, Turkey and
Islamists
By Muhammad Shamsaddin
Megalommatis
http://www.centralclubs.com/you-know-
that-t42796-36.html

6. https://www.academia.edu/25609316/Fr
eemasonic_History_Apostasy_Kemal_Atatur
k_Turkey_and_Islamists_by_Prof_Muhamm
ad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis
16 May 2008
==========================
An inquisitive and pertinent mail sent by
a reader let me draw the conclusion that
more light should be shed on issues
discussed in my earlier article entitled
“Erdogan: Turkey’s Bani Sadr in a
Sinister ‘Second Republic’?”. I publish
here the integral text of the mail, and
then my answer. Discussing Freemasonic
attitude, behaviour, choices, beliefs,
apostasy and iniquity are part of
understanding daily developments in the
surrounding world; they have little to do
with the original faith of the predecessors
of the International Freemasonry, as their
beliefs and practices that have all gone
with the wind.

7. Questions about the Freemasonic
involvement in Turkey
Dear Prof. Dr. M. S. Megalommatis,
I found this article quiet difficult to understand,
especially the meaning of ‘Second Republic of
Freemasonic Soft Power ‘, but then I’m also
ignorant to the working and intentions of the
Freemasonry, especially regarding the
relationship between Islamists and
Freemasonry. (Before reading your various
articles, I assumed it was only a secular
counter-power to the Roman Catholic Church.
But I understand better now why Kemal
Atatürk closed down the Freemasonic Lodges
of Turkey)
Do various Freemasonic Lodges of the world
have the same intentions, or is it primarily the
Freemasonic Lodge of France that is helping
Islamists?
If I understood the article correctly, they do not
wish Turkey to have a similar Islamic
Revolution as Iran, which would be for her to
become the ‘Second Republic of Theocratic
Paranoia’ but instead, want Turkey to become
the ‘Second Republic of Freemasonic Soft
Power’?

8. Should the Islamic Revolution of Iran be
considered as being helped by, but at the
same time also being a failure of the
Freemasonic Lodge of France’s ultimate plan?
Thank you.
Freemasonic Clash with Roman
Catholicism, and the Rise of
Secularism
Dear Culduz,
Thank you for your questions and interest!
Re-reading my article, I find you are right; it is
somewhat ‘cryptic’ or – to put it in another way
– I assume that the readers have a certain
background in the subject, whereas this
apparently is not the case. However!
Yes, you are right in your overall approach;
what you say, namely that Free Masonry “was
only a secular counter-power to the Roman
Catholic Church”. But this is correct if said
within certain historical limits.
If said in 1793, in 1810, in 1870, in 1905, in
1920, your statement sounds absolutely
accurate and up-to-the-point.
But, what if said in 1740?
Secular?

9. There was nothing secular in 1740!
“Those who, living in 1740, envisioneda
Secular Republic to be materialized after
decades or half a century” you may say.
Hmm!
Assuming that the 1740 Free Masons would be
in favour of …. a secular state is assuming a
lot!
Actually, we have no evidence for something
like that.
The evidence we have from Freemasonic
involvement in European politics is precisely
the opposite; the first states they created out
of scratch, namely the United States of
America (1774) and the Nouveau Regime of
France (the First Republic – 1789), show the
marked existence of religious, anti-Catholic of
course, ideas, concepts, theories, and an
undeclared, semi-declared, hinted at, hidden
(you choose whatever you like) faith is the
Transcendental.
I suppose you agree with me that the
replacement of the Trinity God of the Roman
Catholic Church by the Supreme Being (Etre
Supreme) consists in an act of Faith.
Arranging the 20th Prairial (8th June) as Fête
de l’Être Suprême is a purely religious
phenomenon. Faith itself is utterly religious,

10. and the French State religion was a semi-
declared form of the Freemasonic religion the
existence of which ridiculously and cowardly
Freemasons deny in our days.
Why Freemasons do not admit their
religion exists, and is different from
the rest.
Unadulterated historical truth is that the
Freemasons were always afraid to explicitly
and boldly declare their faith and religion.
Contrarily to the pleasant narrations that they
teach in the lower degrees, when admonishing
a new member, Free Masonry was not
established in the beginning of the 18th
century. The origins of Freemasonry go back
in History, and antedate the formation of the
official Christianity. Their virulent opposition
to the Catholic Church over the span of the
last centuries represents a very brief period of
Freemasonic – Catholic rivalry.
To put it correctly, this rivalry exists between
two Priesthoods that procreated several
religious, philosophical and ideological
systems in various continents and in different
historical moments; one of these priesthoods
put all its stakes on the formation of the
system that is currently known as Christianity
with center at Rome (out of which came the
Catholic Church).

11. The other priesthood opposed Christianity,
and due to the fact that Christianity prevailed,
it lost all its impact on the society and the
political power. It underwent various
transformations (from the Gnostics of the Late
Antiquity to the so-called Western
Manichaeans – a pejorative term introduced by
their Christian rivals –, the Cathars, the
Knights Templar, the Illuminati and the
Rosicrucians) the last of which adopted the –
supposedly innovative and neutral – term of
Freemasonry.
Due to the colossal dimensions of the Clash
between Freemasons and Catholics, the
supreme class of the International
Freemasonry (religious branch) has always
been hesitant to unveil in public, to introduce,
to launch its own religion that preserves only
at the esoteric level to those initiated in the
various degrees of Freemasonry, and more
explicitly in the highest degrees.
This has its counterpart within Christianity
whereby the Jesuits initiate their members in a
vision and faith totally different than that of the
average Christian believer, although not
opposed; one should perceive this faith as
“qualitatively higher”.
This shows precisely what has happened
since the times of the Late Antiquity until now;
two priesthoods that had part of their religion

12. publicly diffused and part available for the
initiated members engaged in total
confrontation, whereby one was defeated and
preservedits faith only at the clandestine level
(that available for the initiated members).
The fight has been too important for the
diachronic Freemasonry to risk unwise
movements, an eventual revelationof a
religion opposite to Christianity, and an
eventual rejection by the masses. Many other
parameters play a certain role in this regard,
and as the early 19th century Freemasons
were not happy with the lukewarm acceptance
of a copy of their religion, i.e. the French State
religion of 1793, they did not go ahead with the
plan of publicly introducing their religion.
One has to admit that the early decades of the
19th century justified such a decision; it was
not certainly the correct moment for the
introduction of a new religion; philosophies,
ideologies, political systems, intellectual and
scientific developments and explorations,
technological discoveries and economic
booming were all far more attractive. And the
greatest of the Freemason philosophers of the
18th century, Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot or
Montesquieu, was not at the level of Basil of
Caesarea, Origen, St Augustine, Mani, Celsius
or Tabari.

13. Secularism – an imperative need of
multi-cultural societies
However, my intention here is not to write the
History of the Freemasonic clash with Catholic
Christianity but to answer your questions as
regards the Freemasonic involvement in
Turkey, and more particularly in favour of
Erdogan.
Before reaching that point it is important to
bear in mind that the concept of the Secular
Republic is absolutely Freemasonic, and does
not consist in an ultimate target but in political
means; it is the tool – according to the
Freemasonic evaluation of it – of weakening,
culturally, socially, intellectually,
educationally, and therefore socially,
economically, and politically, the Catholic
Church and their supporters. The secular state
is the reason for the rise of the high number of
the non practicing Christians in the second
half of the 20th century. To today’s
Freemasons the Secular State has been a
success, as it brought them in power.
According to the original principles of
Freemasonry, the Secular State is nothing
important to consider, let alone laud.
Of course, it is correct that Kemal Ataturk was
known for his Freemasonic affiliations, and his
ideals were identical to those of the early 20th

14. century Freemasons who, sticking to their
unveiled faith, propagated the concept of
secularism and the laic state.
Absence of Secularism means Rise
of Islamic Terrorism
Of course, today someone does not need to be
Freemason to see that a Secular state
represents an imperative need for our
multicultural societies. What slips the memory
of many is the fact that our societies have
changed tremendously over the last 80 years
(as we speak of Ataturk). Few societies have
remained absolutely uniform, and only to them
a non-secular, religious, status could
eventually apply. Again, even if there is an
entirely mono-ethnic and uni-cultural society,
established out of Christian Protestants or
Muslim Sunnis, a religious state consists in
direct oppression of those among the local
populations who do not want to practice their
religion. And this is very significant, because
paranoid Western pseudo-Christians, by
insisting on attacks against the Secular State –
either in the United States or in Poland –
trigger, either they want it or not, either they
know it or not, the Islamic Terrorism rise.
This is precisely what Islamic terror promoting
local groups and secret societies has devised
in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt,
Pakistan and other fanaticized societies of

15. analphabetic masses: they try to impose strict
practice on those, who – although Muslim – do
not want to practice Islam. And they are the
silent majority – to which the pathetic, useless,
imbecile and wicked American and European
politicians and diplomats do not even speak,
sticking to their official interlocutors who all
cheat and entrap the “Western enemy”.
Apostasy in Freemasonry
Going back to your early statement and to my
point about its time limits, we have to check
whether all Freemasons stick to their Secular
ideal today. Well, we have to admit that the late
80s – early 90s ideological changes reflect
earlier, parallel and opposite, movements
within Freemasonry.
Currently, an Apostate Freemasonic Lodge
preaches atheism, evolutionism, and social
immoralism and nihilism; and another
Apostate Freemasonic Lodge denounces the
traditional faith of Freemasonry in order to
preserve a portion of power and members in a
changing world. Two different sorts of
apostasy! You can attest their ramifications in
the political life and the societies of many
countries.
Kemal Ataturk and Rudolf von Sebottendorf
Notice that I speak of ‘earlier movements’;

16. Kemal Ataturk most honorably closed down
the deviated Turkish Freemasonic Lodges that
ostracized the disciples of Rudolf von
Sebottendorf, attempting to target an alliance
with Pope Pius XII (Eugenio Pacelli – Pastor
Angelicus) and Hitler in the same way today
the Prostitute French Freemasonic Lodge
extols the disreputable Satanism practiced by
Jean Paul II, the bogus-Freemasonic Pope.
When you listen to the irrelevantand comical
people of the Academie Francaise laud such a
pope, you understand that their fear, guilt and
iniquity definitely render them authentic
disciples of the bogus-leader they are
currently fabricating; they consider their
iniquitous deeds as concealed, but they are
well known and visible to many as afar as the
four corners of the Universe!
As you get through the lines, I already gave
you an answer to the question whether all the
Freemasonic Lodges have the same
intentions. As you see, this is not the case,
and one could eventually grasp this through
my adjective ‘Apostate’ for one or some
Freemasonic Lodges; if one or some are
‘apostate’, there is good reason to think that
others are not!
Apostate Freemasonic Lodge and
plans for Turkey

17. This problem does however hinge on the
influence and the impact of every lodge, and
this can vary tremendously; as a matter of fact,
there are lodges more involvedin
Transcendental Research and Operation, and
lodges well versedinto Politics and Finance
(either opposing one another or not).
In this regard, if the most highly politicized
lodge of France supports the anti-Secular
conspiracy against Turkey, it is quite enough;
you don’t need all the French lodges to do so!
And again, as you say in your penultimate
paragraph “they do not wish Turkey to have a
similar Islamic Revolution as Iran, which would
be for her to become the ‘Second Republic of
Theocratic Paranoia’ but instead, want Turkey
to become the ‘Second Republic of
Freemasonic Soft Power'”; this by itself is
twice disastrous.
“Soft Power”: the most monstrous
and inhuman Tyranny of all times
First. If the plan meets success (which is
highly unlikely), instead of the existing Turkish
Republic that is ruled by Turks in a democratic
way, there will be the much desired by the
Apostate Freemasonic Lodge ‘Soft Power’,
which is the most monstrous and inhuman
Tyranny of all times, plus in this case the
absolute powers will be in Non-Turkish hands.

18. The truth is simple; there is no perfect
democracy, and many forms of non-
democratic systems can be more democratic
than several nominally democratic systems.
What the miserable, Freemasonic puppet-
journalists attack in Turkey, namely the central
role played by the army in the establishment
and the preservationof the Republic and the
secular democratic system, is precisely what
prevents the Apostate Freemasonic lodge from
ruling Turkey by proxies.
The military certainly represent a non-
controllable (through elections and referenda)
part of the Turkish democratic system. The
Freemasonic puppets accuse this as un-
democratic; their concern is not the complete
– 100% – as democratization of Turkey, as
complete democratization does not exist
anywhere in the world, and it will never be the
case in societies larger than a 50000 people
city.
They want to replace – in the non-controllable
part of the Turkish democratic system – the
military with the Freemasonic proxies. They
think that a constitutional change will be
enough to pull to carpet under the feet of the
military, give more powers to the controlled
(through the mass media and the Finance
world) Erdogan government that will go ahead
with further liberalizationsteps, selling to

19. Freemasons the state run companies that are
property of the Turkish people – not the
French Freemasons.
Like this, calculating as the most imbecile
beings in the world, they hope to install a
totally controlled (by them) situation in Turkey.
By the way, if one wants to analyze the
pathology of the Apostate Freemasons’ sick
and debased thought, one would result in
publishing the most voluminous opus in the
history of all sciences.
What one should carefully remember is that,
for the international, eschatological plans of
the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge, the role of
Turkey is a very limited one, much inferior to
today’s Turkey’s role and stand, let alone the
great potentialities that are always there. To
minimize Turkey, they want to create a
Kurdistan as they already control some Kurds,
and they believe that, through further Turco-
Kurdish clashes, they will control Kurds more
effectively (expecting them to run to their
proxies for protection).
Their iniquitous plan stipulates a dramatic
increase of the Turkish homosexuals’ social
role, a tremendous increase in drugs use, and
all sorts of devious developments that
absolutely dehumanize any society, not only
Turkey.

20. Second, and more important: if the plan meets
failure (which is highly likely), instead of them
controlling Turkey, after the much desired (by
them) destitution of the Turkish military, it will
be the existing Islamists, who will just repeat
the Iran 1979 – 81 old (but unstudied and
unlearnt) story.
As you correctly understood, they tried to
trigger events in Iran in 1979 (not the ‘Islamic
Revolution of Iran’), but they turned against
them, and they were able with great difficulty
to save their Apprentice Proxy, the comical
Iranian president, whose website
(http://www.banisadr.com.fr/index.shtml) ranks
no 945,110 this morning (down from 1,119,824,
probably because of my reference to him as a
museological curiosity)! This brilliant
Freemasonic trash of a person (and
personality) Erdogan should bring back in his
mind once per hour at least, if he wants an
honorable exit from this vain world of
materialistic endeavors.
By Prof. Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin
Megalommatis
Published: 7 August 2007