The three empires - Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal - were large Muslim empires that rose during the post-Mongol era. They were all "gunpowder empires" that utilized new military technologies like cannons. The Ottoman Empire was led by Sunni Muslims and grew powerful after the Mongols. The Safavid Empire in Persia was led by Shia Muslims and rivaled the Ottomans. The Mughal Empire was created by descendants of Turks and Mongols and ruled over most of India with a Muslim minority controlling a Hindu majority. While they competed for power and influence, all three empires featured absolute rulers, slavery, and adaptations of Islam to local cultures.
2. • The Ottomans were Sunni
Muslims who gained power
after the Mongols left.
• They built one of the wealthiest
and most powerful Empires of
the world at its time.
3.
4. • They were all Military Empires &
“Gunpowder Empires”
5. The Safavid Empire (Persia)was Shia
Muslim and a rival of the Ottoman
Empire.
6.
7. The Mughal Empire
was created by
descendents of
Turks and Mongols
who built an empire
in which a Muslim
minority controlled
a Hindu majority.
9. Muslim Empires
• As Islam spread to new settings in
Afro-Eurasia, believers adapted it to
local cultural practices.
• The split between the Sunni and Shi’a
traditions intensified, and Sufi
practices became more widespread.
10. Similarity in Political Structure…
• All had a centralized government with an
absolute ruler who had both political and
religious authority.
12. • Suleiman, Abbas I, Akbar were the
absolute rulers at the height of each empire
and were contemporaries.
13. But these Islamic empires weren’t
necessarily allies…
Letter from the Ottoman Sultan to the
Safavid ruler (1514)
“You have deserted the path of salvation
and the sacred commandments. . . The
ulama (Islamic judges) have pronounced a
sentence of death against you, perjurer and
blasphemer.”
17. A similarity in social class structure
• Each had Slavery as an institution
– nonMuslims were slaves but the
status of slaves varied widely
Evidence:
Concubines
of India
19. European perspective on Ottoman Empire
Source: Olgier de Busbecq, Austrian
ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, in an
official letter to the Austrian Emperor, 1550.
“Just as we were leaving the city, we were met by
wagon-loads of wretched Christian slaves who
were being led to horrible servitude…Youths
and men of advanced age were driven along in
herds or else were tied together in chains. I
could scarcely restrain my tears in pity for the
plight of the Christian population.”
Editor's Notes
One of the major military victories was the Ottoman capture of Constantinople – which became Istanbul.
Persian culture, including architecture, had a major influence on other Islamic regions.
This is from a letter sent from Suleyman to Francis I – King of France. Francis had asked for help in his war with the Holy Roman Emperors alliance. Suleyman made an alliance with France.
1599, Abbas sent his first diplomatic mission to Europe to gain allies against the Ottoman Empire. Gaining access to European weapons technology was a priority for Safavids—the Mughals had less to do with Europeans’ politically until later.
“best and brightest” of European controlled territory went military or bureaucracy or concubines (SLAVES? What’s the interpretation?)
Compare this with the empire of faith dvd’s version of devishirme.
REMINDER – these Islamic empires are not the only ones “out there” in the 1500s – they were part of a growing global trade and diplomatic network sandwiched between a growing European power states and a strong China resurging after defeating the Mongols (YUAN).