3. Halitosis is a medical term, first coined by the
George Lambert in 1921, to describe oral
malodor or bad breath.
Malodor is the
scientific term for bad breath and has its origin from
Latin (“malus,” bad, evil + “odorem, odor,” smell,
scent) and defined as a distinctive smell that is
offensively unpleasant.
INTRODUCTION
4. DEFINITIONS
• Halitosis is also termed
as fetor ex ore or fetor
oris. It is a foul or
offensive odor
emanating from the oral
cavity.
CARRANZA(2003)
Unpleasant odor of the
expired air whatever the
origin may be. Oral
malodour specifically refers
to such odor originating
from the oral cavity itself.
JAN LINDHE(2003)
Halitosis is the general term used to
describe a foul odor emanating from
the oral cavity, in which proteolysis,
metabolic products of the
desquamating cells and bacterial
putrefaction are involved.
MARITA ET AL., 2001
5. SYNONYMS
Bad or foul breath
Breath malodour
Oral malodour
Foetor ex-ore
Foetor oris
Stomato dysodia
10. OLFACTORY
REFERENCE
SYNDROME
Olfactory reference syndrome (ORS) is defined as the psychiatric condition characterized by
persistent preoccupation about body odour accompanied by shame, embarrassment,
significant distress, avoidance behaviour and social isolation
11. • When tricyclic antidepressant medication is used, xerostomia can appear, leading to an
increase of halitosis awareness. Patients with symptoms of halitophobia or ORS, should
not be treated by dental practitioners or by ENT specialists, but should be referred to
psychologists or even to psychiatrists.
• Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, which increases the concentration of serotonin
in the brain, can help to treat this phenomenon.
14. • In a recent study of 2000 patients who visited a multidisciplinary bad breath clinic in Leuven,
Belgium, an oral cause was found in nearly 76% of the patients, especially tongue coating
(43%), gingivitis/periodontitis (11%) or a combination of the two (18%). Pseudo-halitosis/
halitophobia was diagnosed in 16% of the cases; and ENT/extra-oral causes were found in 4%
of the patients.
15. • Physiologic
Diet — vegetables such as onions,
garlic,
radishes, turnips
Beverages such as tea and coffee
Alcohol-based wine, brandy,
whisky, liqueurs and beer
Dairy products that contain protein
Dehydration, starvation,
constipation, diarrhea
CAUSES
19. METABOLIC DISORDERS
Trimethylaminuria - fishy
odour.
• According to Whittle et al., this genetic disease is the
largest cause of undiagnosed body odour.
• is a disorder in which the volatile, fish-smelling compound,
trimethylamine accumulates and is excreted in the urine,
but it is also found in the sweat and breath.
• Because many patients have associated body odours or
halitosis, trimethylaminuria sufferers can meet serious
difficulties in their social context, leading to isolation and
even depression.
20. • Oesophagus. Only in specific cases, this is the origin of malodour. When a Zenker’s
diverticulum is present, a chronic unpleasant odour appears. The incidence of this
phenomenon is less than 0.1% and it is only diagnosed in patients over 65 years of
age. Also bleeding of the oesophagus can cause a musty odour. When severe
regurgitation is determined, halitosis will be present.
• Stomach. Infections with Helicobacter pylori can cause peptic ulcers. There is no 100%
clear correlation found between these ulcers and halitosis. In vitro studies show
significant VSC production by H. pylori.
• Intestines. In cases of intestinal obstruction, a faecal mouth odour may be detectable,
as found in two siblings with extrinsic duodenal obstruction caused by congenital
peritoneal bands.
21.
22.
23. Formation of volatile sulfur compounds:
• VSCs have also been implicated in the progression of periodontal disease. VSCs aggravate
periodontitis by: Disrupting the oral mucosa (pocket epithelium), thereby increasing bacterial
invasion. Impede wound-healing by altering metabolism of fibronectin. Increase the release
of interleukin- 1 and PGE2.
• High VSC concentration might be a predictor of periodontal disease progression.
• Gram-negative, proteolytic bacteria are believed to play an essential role in the formation of VSCs,
although Gram-positive bacteria such as Peptostreptococcus species have also shown ability to
produce VSCs in vitro (McNamara et al. 1972; Persson 1989; Claesson 1990; Persson et al. 1990)
VOLATILE SULPHUR COMPOUNDS
30. AT THE 1ST EXAMINATION
WRIST LICK TEST
A. SELF ASSESSMENT
Subjects are asked to extend
their tongue and lick their
wrist in a perpendicular
fashion.
The presence of odor is
judged by smelling the wrist
after 5 seconds at a distance
of about 3cm.
31.
32. ORGANOLEPTIC ASSESSMENT
• considered as the “gold standard” to diagnose halitosis in a clinical setting.
• The trained judge or clinician smells a series of different air samples of the patient as
follows: Oral cavity odor is examined on the subject as he is made to refrain from
breathing while the examiner places his nose 10 cm from the oral cavity.
• The judge smells the expired air as the patient counts from 1 to 10 as this is done to
promote drying up of the palate and tongue mucosa, expressing VSCs.
33. By inserting a translucent tube (2.5 cm diameter, 10 cm length) into the
patient’s mouth and having the person exhale slowly, the breath, undiluted by
room air, can be evaluated and assigned an organoleptic score.
The tube is inserted through a privacy screen (50cm-70cm) that separates the
examiner and the patient.The use of a privacy screen allows the patient to
believe that they have undergone a specific malodour examination rather than
the direct-sniffing procedure.
34. ORGANOLEPTIC SCORES
1. TONZETICH J ET AL (1976) 2. ORGANOLEPTIC SCORES (0- 5) BY ROSENBERG ,
MULLOCH ET AL 1991
1
0 – absence of odor
1 - detectable
2 – slightly objectionable
3 – slightly to moderately
objectionable
4 – moderately objectionable
5 – moderately to strongly
objectionable
6 – strongly objectionable
35. PORTABLE VOLATILE SULFIDE
MONITOR
• Halimeter analyzes the concentration of hydrogen sulfide and
methylmercaptan, but without discriminating them. The
examination should preferably be done after at least 4 hours
of fasting and after keeping the mouth closed for 3 minutes.
The mouth air is aspirated by inserting a drinking straw fixed
on the flexible tube of the instrument.
• The straw is kept about 2 cm behind the lips, without touching
any surface and while the subject keeps the mouth slightly
open and breathes normally. The sulfide meter uses a
voltametric sensor that generates a signal when exposed to
sulfur-containing gases, especially hydrogen sulfide. Absence
of breath malodor leads to readings of 100 ppb or lower.
36. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
• . This device can analyze air, ( incubated) saliva, or crevicular fluid for any volatile
component. About 100 compounds have been isolated from saliva and tongue
coating, with most identified, from ketones to alkanes and sulfur-containing
compounds to phenyl compounds. Elaborate gas chromatography is only available in
specialized centers but is especially useful for identifying nonoral causes.
37. DARK-FIELD OR PHASE-CONTRAST
MICROSCOPY.
• Gingivitis and periodontitis are typically associated with a higher incidence of motile
organisms and spirochetes, so shifts in these proportions allow monitoring of
therapeutic progress. Another advantage of direct microscopy is that the patient
becomes aware of bacteria being present in plaque, tongue coating, and saliva.
38. SALIVA I N C U B A T I O N TEST.
• Reveals VSCs and other compounds such as indole, skatole, lactic acid, methylamine,
diphenylamine, cadaverine, putrescine, urea, ammonia, dodecanol, and tetradecanol
• By adding some proteins, such as lysine or cysteine, the production of respectively cadaverine or
hydrogen sulfide is dramatically increased.
• Organoleptic evaluation (or assessment of the VSCs) of the saliva headspace offers promising
perspectives for monitoring treatment results.
39. ELECTRONIC NOSE.
• A new device that is being developed which has the
capacity of the human nose is referred to as the electric
nose.
• The electronic nose is an intelligent sensing device that
uses an array of gas sensors which are overlapping
selectively along with a pattern reorganization
component.
Merits
• Can identify the specific components of an odor.
• Can analyze the chemical make-up of the compound.
• Smaller.
• Less expensive.
• Easier to use.
40. .
BANA TEST
• It is a chair side, enzyme-based assay, which is used to determine the
proteolytic activity of certain oral anaerobes that contribute to oral malodor and
which are considered as active H2 S producers.
41.
42. PREVENTIVE MEASURES
Visit dentist regularly
Periodical tooth cleaning by dental
professional.
Brushing of teeth twice daily
Use of a tongue scraper
Flossing after brushing to remove food
particles stuck in between the tooth surfaces
Limit intake of strong odour
substance
Limit sugar and caffeine
intake.
Drink plenty of liquids.
Chew sugar free gum for a
minute when mouth feels dry.
45. • Mechanical reduction of intraoral nutrients and microorganisms.
• Chemical reduction of oral microbial load
• Rendering the malodorous gases nonvolatile.
• Masking the malodor
46. • A systemic review by van der Sleen et al., demonstrated that tongue brushing or
tongue scraping have the potential to successfully reduce breath odour and tongue
coating. Due to tongue cleaning, the taste seems to Improve again.
• A/c to a study by Rosenberg M et al, chlorhexidine (CHX): CHX is the most efficient
molecule against plaque. Rosenberg showed that rinsing with 0.2% CHX causes a
reduction of 43% in VSCs and of 50% in the organoleptical scores on a day-long basis.
47. Essential Oils
• Previous studies evaluated the
short-term effect (3 hours) of a
Listerine rinse (which contains
essential oils) compared with a
placebo rinse." '-
• Listerine was found to be only
relatively effective against oral
malodor (±25% reduction vs.
10% for placebo) and caused a
sustained reduction in the levels
of odorigenic bacteria.
C h l o r i n e D i o x i d e
Is a powerful oxidizing agent that
can eliminate bad breath by
oxidation of hydrogen sulfide,
methylmercaptan, and the amino
acids methionine and cysteine.
A study by Frascella J et al,
demonstrated that single use of a
chlorine dioxide– containing oral
rinse slightly reduces mouth odor
by 29% after 4 hrs.
.
48. Two-Phase Oil-
Water Rinse
Rosenberg et al designed
a two-phase oil-water
rinse containing CPC that
was shown to result in
daylong reduction in oral
malodor.
Triclosan
A broad-spectrum antibacterial
Agent, has been found to be
effective against most oral
bacteria and has a good
compatibility with other
compounds. It has
BACTERIOSTATIC action
targets bacteria primarily by
inhibiting fatty acid
synthesis.
Used for oral home care.
An 84% reduction of VSCs
after 3 h is proved in a study
49. Aniine fluoride / Stannous
Fluoride.
The association of
aminefluoride with stannous
fluoride (AmF/Snl 2)
resulted in encouraging
reductions of morning breath
odor, even when oral
hygiene is insufficient.
Hydrogen Peroxide.
Suarez et aL reported that rinsing with 3'%
hydrogen peroxide (H2O,) produced
impressive reductions (±90%) in sulfur
gas that persisted for 8 hours.
O x i d i z i n g Lozenges
Greenstein et al." reported that sucking a
lozenge with oxidizing properties reduces
tongue dorsum malodor for 3 hours. This
antimalodor effect may be caused by the
activity of dehydroascorbic
acid, which is generated by peroxide-
mediated oxidation of ascorbate present in
the lozenges.
50. SUBSTANCES CAUSING CONVERSION OF VSCS
1. METAL SALT SOLUTIONS
Young A. et al (2001) – special effect of
Halita may result from the VSC conversion
ability of Zinc.
Commercially available Zn Salts: Toothpastes –
Trioral, Viadent Advanced care, Aim TC,
Close-up TC, Mentadent Gumcare.
----- Mouthwashes – Lavoris, Listermint
2. TOOTHPASTES :
Brushing the dorso-posterior surface of the
tongue with a dentifrice was more effective
than brushing the teeth in reducing VSCs.
(Tonzetich (1976)
Dentifrices with triclosan have shown to
reduce OL scores significantly. (Gerlach et al
1998, Niles 1999, Hu et al 2003 & Farrell in
2006)
Dentifrices with Baking Soda (Brunette et
al 1998), essential oils (Olshan et al 2003) &
stannous fluoride (Gerlach et al 1998)
seemed to be effective.
51. 3. CHEWING GUM : Tsunoda et al (1996) investigated the
beneficial effects of chewing gum containing tea extracts.
Epigallocatechin (EGCg) is the main deodorizing agent
among tea catechins. The chemical reaction between EGC
& CH3SH results in nonvolatile product.
Waler S.M (1997) compared different concentration of zinc
in a chewing gum and found that 2mg Zn acetate
containing chewing gum remained in the mouth for 5min
resulted in immediate reduction in VSC levels of upto 45%
but long term effect was not mentioned.
52. • Treatment with rinses, mouth sprays and lozenges containing volatiles with a
pleasant odor have only a short term effect. (Reingewirtz N. et al 1999 & Replogle
W.H. in 1996) Eg- Mint – containing lozenges.
• Another pathway is to increase the solubility of malodorous compounds in the
saliva by lowering the Ph of the saliva. (low ph increases the solubility of VSCs)
MASKING THE ORAL
MALODOR
53. VSCs aggravate the periodontitis process by:
increasing the permeability
of the pocket and mucosal
epithelium
Methyl mercaptan enhances
interstitial collagenase
production, interleukin-
1(IL-1) production by
mononuclear cells,
impede wound healing.
Reduction in total protein
synthesis
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HALITOSIS AND
PERIODONTAL DISEASE
54. • 1981, Pitts et al studied the correlations between odor scores and microbiological findings in crevicular
samples of periodontally healthy subjects. They found that higher levels of crevicular bacteria were associated
with greater odor scores.
• A porcine non-keratinized sublingual mucosa was exposed to hydrogen sulfide and methyl
mercaptan, its permeability increases by 75% and 103%, respectively (Ng & Tonzetich 1984).
• Methyl mercaptan reduces collagen synthesis by 39%, while increases intracellular degradation of
newly synthesized collagen by 62% (Johnson et al. 1996).
• When porcine epithelial tissues were treated with methyl mercaptan, the tissues demonstrated
extensive impaired and dead cells (Johnson et al. 1992a).
These findings suggest that VSC are directly toxic to epithelial tissues and can facilitate bacterial
invasion into underlying connective tissue.
56. • Individuals who flossed daily had significantly less odor level than those who did not (Rosenberg
1996). Hence, it is a good motivation tool to have patient smell the floss after each use.
• When the patients’ conventional hygiene is adequate but their oral malodor problem exist, tongue
brushing is also an effective way (Rosenberg & Leib 1995).
• If the patients still suffer from oral malodor after maintaining good oral hygiene, rinsing or gargling
with an effective mouthwash may be advised.
• Quirynen et al. (1998) monitored patients with oral malodor. Patients with srp + mouthrinse showed
significant malodour reduction compared to group with srp alone
57. • Miyazaki et al.(1999) established the recommended examination for halitosis and a classification
of halitosis with corresponding treatment needs.
Accordingly, different treatment needs (TN) have been described for the various diagnostic
categories.
• The responsibility for the treatment of physiologic halitosis (TN-1), oral pathologic halitosis (TN-
1 and TN-2), and pseudo-halitosis (TN-1 and TN-4)
resides on dental practitioners.
• However, extra-oral pathologic halitosis (TN-3) and halitophobia (TN-
5) should be managed by a physician or medical specialist and a psychiatrist or psychological
specialist.
58. Rosenberg M, McCulloch CA. Measurement of oral malodor: Current methods and future prospects. J Periodontol
1992;63:776-82.
Bad breath is a source of embarrassment in social circles. A person having bad breath could be a subject of mockery and may therefore suffer from emotional and psychological distress.
Oral malodor can be classified according to its duration as temporary (exogenous) or persistent (endogenous). According to its etiology, oral malodor can be classifi ed
In the year 2000, Yaegaki and Coil classified halitosis as genuine, pseudo, and halitophobia.
Genuine halitosis: Obvious malodor with intensity which is beyond socially acceptable level.
Temporary malodors are caused by certain foods ( e.g., garlic) or drinks for transient period after consumption and that will only last 24-72 h. These external substances when ingested get absorbed into the circulatory system and release of odors through breathing and saliva. The best way to control this type of malodor is to refrain from ingesting and avoiding the offending substances.
On the other hand, persistent or endogenous malodor is primarily due to proteolytic, anaerobic, Gramnegative bacteria which cause protein digestion and produce several fetid substances that is, volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), primarily hydrogen sulfi de (H2S) and methyl mercaptan.
PHYSIOLOGIC HALITOSIS: Malodor that originates in the oral cavity and not caused by any specifi c disease or pathologic condition. The main source of
origin is likely to be dorsum of the tongue.
Pathologic halitosis: oral: Halitosis caused by disease or pathologic processes related to the oral cavity.
This develops secondary to pathologic conditions such as periodontitis, gingivitis, necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis, aphthous ulcers, and xerostomia or even tongue coating.
It can also be of extraoral origin. Malodor can originate from any pathology in the nasal, paranasal, and pulmonary tracts or digestive tract. Diabetes mellitus, uremia, and cirrhosis of the liver all cause the emission of characteristic odors. 90% of all malodor is of oral origin and 10% is of extraoral origin.
Pseudohalitosis: There is no obvious malodor perceived by others, but the patient believes that
he or she has oral malodor.
Halitophobia: Patient complains of malodor which is not perceived by others. Halitophobia is characterized by a patient’s persistent belief that he or she has halitosis despite reassurance, treatment and counseling.
Patients with pseudo-halitosis show more often symptoms of depression
Olfactory Reference Syndrome is another psychological disorder in which there is a preconceived notion about one having foul mouth breath or emits offensive body odor.
The general view is that halitosis reflects complex interactions between several oral, mostly anaerobic, Gram-negative bacteria, and no specific bacterial strain is responsible for the condition. halitosis reflects putrefaction by anaerobic, Gram-negative bacteria.These microorganisms digest proteins from food residues, cells and other saliva debris into amino acids. This is followed by further cleavage of certain amino acids to bad-smelling by-products of bacterial metabolism, predominantly VSCs (H2S, CH3SH and dimethyl sulfi de [CH3]2S), organic acids (butyric acid), aromatic compounds (indole, skatole) and amines (putrescine, cadaverine).[36,37] Table 2 lists the various bacterial species associated with oral malodor and Table 3 enumerates various bacteria responsible for production of VSCs.
One of the common myths about oral malodor is that it originates in the stomach, which is seldom the case. The esophagus, which connects the stomach with the mouth, is not an open tube and is normally collapsed,[14] thereby, preventing odorous gases to escape from the stomach to the mouth.
Although several extraoral sites and systemic conditions have been implicated in the source of oral malodor, in 80-90% of cases the site of origin is oral cavity.
The cause of bad breath is most likely to originate from the dorsoposterior region of the tongue, even in individuals who maintain excellent oral hygiene, good
dentition and a healthy periodontium.
The irregular and deeply fi ssured posterior dorsum of the tongue provides favorable conditions to support bacterial growth and not surprisingly, harbors the highest amounts of anaerobic bacteria that could explain for being the most common location for oral halitosis.
Moreover desquamated epi cells n food remnants also remain trapped in these retentive areas n consequently putrified by bacteria
Fissured tongue and hairy tongue ….. The accumulation of food remnants intermingled with exfoliated cells and bacteria forms a coating on the tongue dorsum. These factors for putrefaction put together leads to halitosis.
Several investigators identified the dorsal posterior surface of the tongue as primary source of breath malodour.
Several studies have shown that the VSC levels in the mouth correlate positively with the depth of periodontal pockets (the deeper the pocket, the more bacteria, particularly anaerobic species) .
The amount of VSCs in breath increases with the number, depth, and bleeding tendency of the periodontal pockets.
Morning breath. Due to the reduced saliva production during night,anaerobic putrefaction will increase, causing the typical morning breath.
A positive correlation between the depth of the pockets and the concentration of the sulphur components has been shown.
Patients with a dry mouth often show an increased volume of plaque on teeth and tongue. The lack of salivary flow, leads to the disappearance of the antimicrobial activity of the saliva and the transition from Gram-positive bacteria to Gram-negative species.
Moreover, other salivary factors can influence the development of malodour: an increase of the salivary pH by the intake of amino acids, and a change in the oxygen depletion (a reduction stimulates the metabolism of Gram-negative bacteria, responsible for higher VSC production.
Maximally 10% of the oral malodour cases originate from the ears, nose and throat (ENT) region, from which 3% finds its origin at the tonsils. Very seldom the larynx is The presence of tonsilloliths represents a 10-fold increased risk of abnormal VSC levels. Anaerobic bacteria detected in tonsilloliths belonged to the species of Eubacterium, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, Selenomonas and Tanerella, all of which appear to be associated with the production of VSCs.
Bacterial sinusitis develops mostly out of acute viral sinusitis. Streptococcus pneumonia and Haemophilus influenza are the main responsible bacteria.
Renal disease in the form of chronic renal failure is associated with high blood urea nitrogen levels and low salivary flow rates. Peritoneal dialysis decreased the problem. The dispersed odour is a typical uremic odour in combination with a dry mouth. Also pancreatic insufficiencies can cause oral bad odours Kidney: chronic glomerulonephritis, will lead to an increase of the amines dimethylamine and trimethylamine, which causes a typical fishy odor.
Uncontrolled diabetes: results in accumulation of ketones, which have sweet Smell, like odor of rotten apples
Yamazaki H et al has suggested that daily intake of the supplements activated charcoal and copper chlorophyllin may improve the quality of life of individuals.
For oral malodor unpleasant smell of breath mainly originates from VSCs esp Methyl Mercaptan(CH3SH), hydrogen sulphide(H2S) (main cause for intraoral halitosis) Dimethyl sulphide [(CH3)2S] (main cause for extra oral halitosis) Tonzetich.
Breath odour derived from the oral cavity is mainly caused by volatile Sulphur compounds such as H2S and CH3SH produced through the putrefaction acivity of oral microorganism. The action of microorganism degrades proteinaeous substrates originating from exfoliated oral epithelial cells, blood cells, food debris to amino acids suchas cysteine and methionine, ultimately leading to production of VSCs. This putrefactive activity is especially increased in subjects with periodontal diseases.
It has been shown that VSCS are periodontally pathogenic compounds. VSCs increase the degradation of gingival collagen and reduce the synthesis of collagen.
The odoriferous substances that produce malodor arise from the interaction of microorganisms in the oral cavity and their specific substrates. Proteolytic degradation of
substrates containing sulfur in the saliva, blood, food debris, and epithelial cells by these anaerobic gramnegavtive bacteria result in the formation of agents that can give rise to oral malodor. Amino acids such as cysteine, methionine, arginine, tryptophan, and lysine are biotransformed by the anaerobic bacteria into VSCs (odiferous hydrogen sulfide, methylmercaptan, indole, putrescine, and cadaverine) and sugars are biotransformed by the anaerobic bacteria into short-chain organic
Compounds.
The clinician should question about the frequency of odor, the time of appearance within the day (e.g. after meals, which can indicate a hernia), whether others (non-confidants) have identified the problem (imaginary breath odor?), what kind of medications have been taken and whether dryness of the mouth was noticed.
The proper diagnostic approach to a malodor patient starts with a thorough questioning about the medical history. includes questions about systemic diseases, allergy, asthama, rhinitis, sinusitis and medication. All these can be filled in before the appointment and can be discussed before hand with the physician if needed.
There are 2 types of tests ie, self assessment test and objective tests.
Smelling a metallic or nonodorous plastic spoon after scraping the back of the tongue.
• Smelling a toothpick after introducing it in an interdental area.
• Smelling saliva spit in a small cup or spoon (especially when allowed to dry for a few seconds so that putrefaction odors can escape from the liquid). The odor is judged
by smelling the spoon after 5 seconds at a distance of about 5 cm organoleptically.
Nasal breath odor is checked as the patient is asked to breathe normally with mouth close and the judge gives a score to the exhaled air. Scrapping from the tongue dorsum is taken using a nonodorous spoon as the periodontal problem is presented to the judge.
The advantages of organoleptical scoring are: Inexpensive, no equipment needed and a wide range of odors is
Various disadvantages are the extreme subjectivity of the test, the lack of quantification, the saturation of the nose
and the reproducibility of the test.
Experience of the judge. Other judges are also supposed to Rest their noses for several minutes between the tests to avoid habituation. Clearly has a high degree of subjectivity
Disadvantage:
The monitor needs regular calibration and replacement of the sensor biannually.
Detects only sulfur compounds and thus is only useful for intraoral causes of halitosis
Recently a small, portable gas chromatograph ( OralChroma, Abilit, Ilenderson, Nevada) has been introduced, which makes this technique available for
periodontal clinics. It has the capacity to measure the concentration of the three key sulfides separately.
Too often, patients confuse plaque with food remnants. High proportions of spirochetes in plaque have been associated with a specific
acidic malodor.
Merits: Shifts in the proportions of motile organisms can be noted.
Can monitor therapeutic progress.
Awareness of the patient can be created by showing the bacteria in plaque, tongue coating and saliva.
0.5 ml of unstimulated saliva is collected in a glass tube (diameter 1.5 cm) and
the tube is flushed with carbon dioxide (CO2) and sealed.
It is incubated at 37° C in an anaerobic chamber under an atmosphere of 80% nitrogen, 10% carbon dioxide, and 10% hydrogen over 3 hours.
Electric nose [1],[3],[8] Demerits: It cannot determine volatile chemicals precisely.
Can be used only with a specific application(if the metabolites are already known).
It is difficult to distinguish mouth air compounds from others.(The mouth air sample is contaminated with certain amount of respiratory air).
The BANA Test uses simple smears of tongue coatings or subgingival plaque to detect three malodorous anaerobic bacteria that are also highly associated with periodontitis; Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola and Bacteroides forsythus.
Advantage:
Rapid and inexpensive
Provides visual results, which can be shown to patients.
Disadvantage:
Lack of quantitative data
Inability to determine which of the three bacteria is responsible for enzyme production.
Does not include inhibitor of host protease which could contaminate the plaque sample from saliva, GCF & which cleaves BANA substrate.
When samples containing any of the three bacteria are placed on a BANA impregnated test strip, a hydrolytic reaction turns the strip a distinctive blue color. The darker the blue, the more organisms present. Blood, and saliva do not hydrolyze BANA and do not interfere with the test, but blood in the sample may obscure the visualization of the blue color.
TONGUE SAMPLES:- Wipe a cotton tip swab on the posterior dorsum of the tongue, removing as much coating material as possible. (Figure 1)
Wipe the coated swab onto the lower reagent pad on the BANA test strip
Plaque Samples
Toothpick method :-Use a soft wood toothpick like the STIM-U-DENT®. Insert the toothpick interproximally. Choose dental papilla that appear to be inflamed. Remove the toothpick Take the toothpick and wipe each side onto the same spot on the lower reagent pad.
Curette Method :-Remove supragingival plaque prior to sampling. Use a curette to obtain subgingival plaque from the apical third of any deep pocket. Apply the specimen to the lower test pad on a BANA Test strip.
After all desired sites have been sampled and transferred, moisten the upper pad of the test strip (salmon colored pad) with distilled water on a cotton swab
Fold BANA Test strip at the perforation mark so that the upper and lower pads meet.
Place the BANA Test strip into one of the top slots of the incubatorRemove the card from the incubator and separate the lower portion of the test strip at the perforation and discard as contaminated waste. Caution: the lower portion may contain residual traces of pathogenic bacteria, viruses and beta-naphthylamine, a potentially carcinogenic end product of BANA hydrolysis. Evaluate the BANA Test results by comparing the upper, salmon-colored reagent pad with the sample chart on the BANA Test bottle label
Preventive measures rather than curative aspects are highly recommended
Bcz oral malodor is caused by metabolic degradation of available proteins to malodorous gases bu certain oral micorgs.
Several studies in the past have demonstrated that tongue cleaning reduces both the amount of coating (thus bacterial nutrients) and number of microorganisms and thereby improves the oral malodor more effectively.
Tongue cleaning can be carried out with normal tooth brush but preferably tongue scrapers. Interdental cleaning n tooth brushing also essential mech means of plaque control.
Cleansing of the tongue can be carried out with a normal toothbrush, but preferably with a tongue scraper if a coating is established. This should be gentle cleaning to prevent soft tissue damage. It is best to clean as far backward as possible; the posterior portion of the tongue has the most coating." 'longue cleaning should be repeated until almost no coating material can be re-moved.'‘ Interdental cleaning and toothbrushing are essential mechanical means of dental plaque control. Both remove residual food particles and organisms that cause putrefaction.
Chemical reduction:
Chlorhexidine -0.2%
Triclosan, Essential oils, Oxidizing lozenges
The efficacy of oil-water-CPC cetylpyridinium CHLORIDE formulation is thought to result from the adhesion of a high proportion of oral microorganisms to the oil droplets, which is further enhanced by the CPC. A twice-daily rinse with this product (before bedtime and in the morning) showed reductions in both VSC levels and organoleptic ratings. These reductions were almost comparable to chlorhexidine, superior to Listerine, and significantly superior to a placebo.;
A pilot study demonstrated that an experimental mouth rinse containing 0. 15% triclosan and 0.84'3 zinc produced a more prolonged reduction in mouth odor than a Listerine rinse.‘ The anti-VSC effect of triclosan, however, seems strongly dependent on the solubilizing agents
Zinc is an ion with two positive charges which will bind to twicely negatively loaded sulfur radicals and thus reduce the expression of VSCs
Same applies for other metal ions-mercury and copper.
Zinc forms zinc sulphide by oxidizing vsc precursor rendering it non volatile
TC tartar control
Halita, a rinse containing 0.05% chlorhexidine, 0.05% CPC, and 0.14% zinc lactate, has been even more efficient than a 0.2% chlorhexidine formulation in reducing the VSC levels and organoleptic ratings.
and therefore exposing the underlying connective tissues of the periodontium to bacterial metabolites….
thus further mediating connective tissue breakdown
synthesis by gingival fibroblast which leads to decrease in collagenase digestible protein. This in turn leads to suppressed collagen synthesis along with increased rate of collagen degradation leading to connective tissue breakdown.
There are no standard and accepted protocols for the treatment of oral malodor, however, the possible protocols contain the basic elements including standard dental and periodontal treatment and focused oral malodor treatment.
The purpose of recall visit is to adjust the therapy based on the results of re-examination.
During recall visit, patients are instructed not to consume food containing onions, garlic or hot spices for 48 hrs before the recall visit ; smoke or drink alchohol in the previous 12 hrs; scented cosmetics or after shave lotions on the morning of the recall visit.
At the 1st visit, patients are seen in worst condition to make proper diagnosis.
At re-examination, patients are asked to present themselves in the best condition, meaning follow proper oral hygiene and advised treatment protocols.
The purpose of the recall visit is to adjust the therapy based on the results of this re-examination
Halitosis is an extremely unappealing characteristic of sociocultural interactions and may have long‑term detrimental aftereffects on psychosocial relationships.
Therefore, halitosis must be treated as a serious condition, a multifactorial and rational approach essential for good results. Proper diagnosis and determination of the etiology allow initiation of proper etiologic treatment.