REview Form

1. MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: LYSSA R. APOSTOL
Position: TEACER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED- BUKIDNON
Rating Period: September 2021- January 2022
Name of Rater: MIRNALYN E. ESPANUEVA
Position: MASTER TEACHER II
Date of Review: February 4, 2022
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic
Education
Services
1. Content
Knowledge
and
Pedagogy
1. Applied
knowledge of
content within
and across
curriculum
teaching
areas.
22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement form
about knowledge of content
within and across curriculum
teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness

2. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic
Education
Services
2. Used a
range of
teaching
strategies that
enhance
learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy
skills.
1. Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement
form about teaching
strategies that enhance
learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
learner-centered strategies
that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-centered
strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy
skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic
Education
Services
3. Applied a
range of
teaching
strategies to
develop critical
and creative
thinking, as
well as other
higher-order
thinking skills.
1. Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement
form about teaching
strategies to develop critical
and creative thinking, as well
as other higher-order thinking
skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies
that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or other
HOTS
Quality

3. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
3. Instructional materials
highlighting different teaching
strategies that develop critical
and creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic
Education
Services
2. Learning
Environme
nt and
Diversity of
Learners
4. Managed
classroom
structure to
engage
learners,
individually or
in groups, in
meaningful
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on
activities within
a range of
physical
learning
environments.
22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement
form about managing
classroom structure that
engages learners in various
activities
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
highlighting various
classroom management
strategies that engage
learners in activities/tasks in
different physical learning
environments
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic
Education
Services
5. Managed
learner
behavior
constructively
by applying
positive and
non-violent
Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
observer agreement form about
teacher management of learner
behavior using the following
strategies:
1. Providing motivation
Quality

4. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
discipline to
ensure
learning-
focused
environments.
2. Praising the learners/Giving
positive feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to
learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic
Education
Services
6. Used
differentiated,
developmentall
y appropriate
learning
experiences to
address
learners’
gender, needs,
strengths,
interests and
experiences.
1. Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement
form about using
differentiated,
developmentally appropriate
learning experiences
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’ gender,
needs, strengths, interests
and experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’ gender,
needs, strengths, interests
and experiences
Quality
Efficiency

5. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness
Basic
Education
Services
3.
Curriculum
and
Planning
7. Planned,
managed and
implemented
developmentall
y sequenced
teaching and
learning
processes to
meet
curriculum
requirements
and varied
teaching
contexts.
22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement
form about using
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
highlighting developmentally
sequenced instruction that
meet curriculum goals and
varied teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used to
implement developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning process to meet
curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
8. Participated
in collegial
discussions
that use
teacher and
1. Personal notes of teachers on
LACs/FGDs/meetings with
proof of attendance
2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions
on use of teacher and learner
Quality

6. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learner
feedback to
enrich teaching
practice.
feedback to enrich teaching
practice with proof of
attendance
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic
Education
Services
9. Selected,
developed,
organized and
used
appropriate
teaching and
learning
resources,
including ICT,
to address
learning goals.
1. Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement
form about using appropriate
teaching and learning
resources, including ICT
Examples:
 Activity sheets/task
sheets/work sheets
 PowerPoint presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic Intervention
Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness

7. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic
Education
Services
4.
Assessme
nt and
Reporting
10. Designed,
selected,
organized and
used
diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements.
22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement
form about using diagnostic,
formative and summative
assessment strategies
2. Prepared lesson
plans/modified DLLs
highlighting appropriate use
of formative assessment
strategies
3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer sheets
4. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer sheets
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b) with
sample accomplished rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Quality
Efficiency

8. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Timeliness
Basic
Education
Services
11. Monitored
and evaluated
learner
progress and
achievement
using learner
attainment
data.
1. Compilation of a learner’s
written work with summary of
results and with signature of
parents
2. Formative/summative
assessment tools with TOS
and frequency of errors with
identified least mastered skills
3. Class records/grading sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
showing index of mastery
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic
Education
Services
12.
Communicated
promptly and
clearly the
learners’
needs,
progress and
achievement to
key
stakeholders,
including
parents/guardi
ans.
1. At least 3 samples of
corrected test papers of the
same 3 learners in the same
learning area with parents’ or
guardians’ signature and date
of receipt
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
Parent-Teacher conferences
in all quarters with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by minutes
of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress and
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness

9. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Means of Verification
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Results
Performance
Target
Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
achievement submitted to
other stakeholders
Basic
Education
Services
5. Plus
Factor
13. Performed
various related
works/activities
that contribute
to the
teaching-
learning
process.
10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or
Participation
2. Certificate of Training
3. Certificate of Speakership
4. Committee involvement
5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
activities
6. Book or Journal
Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersons
hip
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
MIRNALYN E. ESPANUEVA LYSSA R. APOSTOL HELEN N. YBAÑEZ
Rater Ratee Approving Authority