Evaluations from first  Year 2 Study Day    PGCE/Cert Ed (PCE) University of Bedfordshire     12 November 2011
Notes• All figures based on 157 returns: if figures don’t add up    it is because not everyone answered everything.•   Spr...
1: Were you prepared for the   work of the Study Day?               No answer                 1%            No           1...
2: Was the topic for the day   relevant to your work?                  No           No   answerA little          2%       ...
3: Was Frank Coffield’s session        stimulating?     A little        No       5% No       answer              0%     3%...
10.0%                                               20.0%                                                       30.0%     ...
Write-in Comments on Keynote and questions                                                                 (broadly groupe...
5: In relation to the lunch                   break...45.0%40.0%35.0%30.0%25.0%20.0%15.0%10.0% 5.0% 0.0%        Keep it as...
6: Was the briefing for the work          of the groups           No answer              Too  Too                         ...
7: How do you rate the work you      did in your group?Not at all useful         No answer  15%              2%           ...
Write-in comments on Interest Groups                                                                      (broadly grouped...
Other write-ins•    Would have liked to buy hot food    • Turnitin session useful•   No biscuits at break.                ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Evaluation of first Year 2 Study Day on 12 November

2,047 views

Published on

Basic charts and collated write-in comments.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Evaluation of first Year 2 Study Day on 12 November

  1. 1. Evaluations from first Year 2 Study Day PGCE/Cert Ed (PCE) University of Bedfordshire 12 November 2011
  2. 2. Notes• All figures based on 157 returns: if figures don’t add up it is because not everyone answered everything.• Spreadsheet available on request. Permits breakdown by Centre and discipline (but with gaps)
  3. 3. 1: Were you prepared for the work of the Study Day? No answer 1% No 15% Well 42% A little 42%
  4. 4. 2: Was the topic for the day relevant to your work? No No answerA little 2% 1% 14% Very 47% Quite 36%
  5. 5. 3: Was Frank Coffield’s session stimulating? A little No 5% No answer 0% 3% Quite 24% Very 68%
  6. 6. 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 0.0% Work well for communication in a large group?Restrict discussion too much? Leave some people out? exercise; (select all that apply) Break up the session too much? 4: Did the “question time”
  7. 7. Write-in Comments on Keynote and questions (broadly grouped)•Awesome!•Extremely stimulating!•Very thought provoking•Excellent•Coffield fantastic. •Question-time needed more active chair.•too political and not relevant •Question time should have been chaired•irrelevant more actively•party political style made me switch off •Discussion too short•Quite left wing •Excellent! But so many more questions to•Get beyond college institutions and look ask!wider •Not enough time for questions •Discussion was informed and excellent•Question time better than the talk •Very thought-provoking•Didnt use written questions •Why doesnt Frank start a group to promote•Should have concentrated on written his ideas as a collective?questions (2) •Not sure what "topic for the day" was•Question time worked better when heditched the cards•Good idea to have written questions--buthe didnt use them!•Some used Question Time as a Soap Box•only one microphone
  8. 8. 5: In relation to the lunch break...45.0%40.0%35.0%30.0%25.0%20.0%15.0%10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Keep it as Allow for Have more No answer short as networking elective possible workshops
  9. 9. 6: Was the briefing for the work of the groups No answer Too Too detailed?vague? 3% 1% 24% About right? 72%
  10. 10. 7: How do you rate the work you did in your group?Not at all useful No answer 15% 2% Very useful 36% Quite useful 47%
  11. 11. Write-in comments on Interest Groups (broadly grouped)• Groups not subject-specific enough• Interest Groups lack focus; not remotely • Too many people think their opinion is the useful only one which matters! • Too much ranting!• related to outcomes this time • Facilitator very vague• It will help for Unit 7 • Each group needs its own tutor (not• Far more useful than previously. Use for shared) Unit 7 • Tutor v. motivated, and got the group• Much better than previously; more engaged structured • Not fair those who went home will use• interesting discussion our work• Good discussion • Afternoon too long • Good networking opportunity• Didnt get group briefing • Id rather be driving home• Brief should allow flexibility• Briefing all incomprehensible jargon• Good notes on BREO
  12. 12. Other write-ins• Would have liked to buy hot food • Turnitin session useful• No biscuits at break. • Do Turnitin in colleges--smaller• Lunch too long group• Lunch too short for networking • Turnitin workshop unsatisfactory• Lunch the most important part of • Morning sessions could be done the day (for networking) online• Lunchbreak was fine• Lunchbreak now fine • Great improvement on last• Good to use library in lunch break year, thank you! • Do these evaluations serve any purpose?

×