From the projected to the transmitted image: The 2.0 construction of tourist destination image and identity in Catalonia
1. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 1
From the projected to the transmitted image:
The 2.0 construction of tourist destination
image and identity in Catalonia
Estela Mariné-Roig
DOCTORAL THESIS
Supervised by Prof. Dr. Salvador Anton Clavé
University Rovira i Virgili, Catalonia, Spain
estela.marine@urv.cat
http://www.urv.cat
2. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 2
Content
1. Aims and hypotheses
2. Theoretical framework
3. Methodology
4. Selected results
5. Concluding remarks
3. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 3
1. Aims
Explore online projected and perceived images of a destination
and assess their correspondence.
Shed light on the role of online user-generated image in the
destination image formation process by building an explanatory
theoretical-conceptual model.
General
Specific
Provide a useful methodology for studies concerning online
image and identity.
Give insight into the specific case of Catalonia and provide an
understanding of the online image identity of a destination.
4. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 4
1. Hypotheses
H1. The perceived image that tourists hold once they have
visited a destination does not correspond to the one
constructed and projected by the destination (neither in terms
of general represented place identity, nor in terms of cultural
identity).
H2. With the creation of user-generated content and its
transmission through the social media, image perceived by
tourists becomes transmitted image and the image formation
circle is increasingly closed from tourist to tourist due to its
great potential influence. The user-generated image online
(such as in travel blogs and reviews) has a greater capacity or
potential to influence than the official destination image (such
as in official tourism websites).
5. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 5
2. Background:
Destination image
Tourist image is the total sum of ideas, feelings, values,
impressions, attributes and identities attached to a
place, within both the perceived image by tourists and
the representations projected by different actors, which
are transmitted in certain contexts and through certain
communication channels
(Derived from Gartner, 1993; Gallarza et al., 2002; Kim & Richardson,
2003; Mercille, 2005; Almeida & Buzinde, 2007; Anton & González,
2008, among others).
6. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 6
2. Background: Online image
Intentionality and power struggles in image projection with
Web 2.0
Users have a social and leisure motivation to post tourist contents online
(Cox et al.,2008;Casaló, 2009; Clever et al. 2009; Bosangit & Mena, 2009).
The power of the different agents on the Internet seems to become
diluted empowerment of users in detriment of tourism organizations
(Akehurst, 2008).
Representative dissonance and image congruency issue
Perceived tourist image becomes projected through user
generated content sharing experience (González, 2010).
Travel blogs and reviews
Official tourism websites
Online
image
Specially interesting to study
perceived-transmitted image of
tourists Objects for projected
and perceived travel research.
Representatives of the
destinations.
7. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 7
Catalonia
First order world tourism destination.
Second top tourist region in EU-27.
2013: 15.6 million foreign tourists.
Barcelona is among the top European
tourist capitals.
9 regional tourist brands.
3. Methodology: Case study
8. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 8
Process for obtaining a suitable database for analysis:
1. Data sources
2. Data collection
3. Data download
4. Data arrangement
5. Data cleaning
6. Data debug
7. Data language detection
8. Data mining
9. Data dissemination
Travel blogs and reviews
Official tourism websites
3. Methodology: Database
9. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 9
3. Methodology: Database
Process for obtaining a suitable database for analysis:
1. Data sources
2. Data collection
3. Data download
4. Data arrangement
5. Data cleaning
6. Data debug
7. Data language detection
8. Data mining
9. Data dissemination
10. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 10
Process for obtaining a suitable database for analysis:
1. Data sources
2. Data collection
3. Data download
4. Data arrangement
5. Data cleaning
6. Data debug
7. Data language detection
8. Data mining
9. Data dissemination
Correct noun Misspellings
Barcelona Bathelona, Barcellona, Barthelonaaaa, Bar-th-elona, Bar-tha-lona, Bar-the-lona ...
Casa Batlló Batllo House; Casa Batillo, Batilló, Batlla, Batllao, Batllò, Bátllo, Batlo, Battllo, Battló ...
Antoni Gaudí Antonio Gaudi; Gaudì, Gaüdi, Gaudie, Gaudii, Goudi, Goudí, Guadi, Gualdi, Gudi ...
Barri Gòtic Barri Gotico; Bari Gotic; Ghotic Barrio, District, Quarter; Gotic area, neighborhood ...
Parc Güell Parc Guël, Güel, Guéll, Guelle; Park Gueil, Guel, Güelle, Guelli; Parque Guelle, Güelle ...
Montjuïc Monjuic, Montjeuic, Montjic, Montjouïc, Montjuîc, Montjuich, Montjuiic, Montjuik ...
Visibility
Usage
Size
3. Methodology: Database
11. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 11
Pyrenees Val d’Aran Terres de Lleida Catalunya Central Costa Brava
Costa Barcelona Barcelona Costa Daurada Terres de l’Ebre Whole Catalonia
Domain (particular acronym) Brand (particular acronym)
HTML
en
PDF
en
PDF
en + other
BarcelonaTurisme.com (BT) Barcelona (Barna) 258 12 3
CostaBrava.org (CB) Costa Brava (cBrav) 1,012 8 -
CostaDaurada.info (CD) Costa Daurada (cDaur) 51 6 7
GenCat.cat (GC) Catalonia (unClass) 10 21 -
GenCat.cat/turistex_nou (GC) Catalonia (unClass) 48 29 1
LleidaTur.com (LT) Terres de Lleida (tLlei) 173 12 2
Spain.info (SP) Catalonia (unClass) 981 5 -
TerresDelEbre.org (TE) Terres de l’Ebre (tEbre) 82 7 1
TurismeDeCatalunya.com (TC) Catalonia (unClass) 250 1 -
TurismePropBarcelona.cat (PB)
Costa Barcelona (cBarc)
Catalunya Central (CatCe)
55 - 27
VisitPirineus.com (VP) Pirineus (Pyren) 28 2 -
VisitValdAran.com (VV) Val d’Aran (vAran) 73 - 6
3. Methodology: Database
Official
Tourism
Websites
12. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 12
Domain Barcelona Other towns Unclassified Empty First blog
GetJealous.com (GJ) 0 0 1,164 * 371 2001-08-27
MyTripJournal.com (MT) 536 72 0 - 2001-07-25
RealTravel.com (RT) 409 69 0 - 1984-07-31
TravBuddy.com (TY) 832 60 0 ** 11 1985-05-20
TravelBlog.org (TB) 2,348 280 106 - 1997-03-07
TravellersPoint.com (TS) 0 0 596 - 1986-05-09
TravelPod.com (TP) 998 481 0 - 1984-12-27
TripAdvisor.com (TA) 67,882 34,519 43 *** 112,698 2002-10-17
VirtualTourist.com (VT) 10,289 2,192 285 *** 515 1999-12-08
Travel blogs and reviews per tourism brands
Web
au ca de es fr ie il It nl+be nz uk us
RT 36 32 4 8 3 2 0 2 4 5 23 103
TY 26 36 8 26 5 10 4 7 62 5 46 209
TP 149 100 14 38 11 10 2 10 4 23 70 315
TS 54 21 2 6 1 2 1 1 2 11 25 61
TA 191 275 39 217 53 272 59 43 96 29 1,587 2,049
VT 32 29 27 142 19 22 15 32 87 8 234 286
Travel blog and review database
Country of origin Language of posts
3. Methodology: Database
Travel blogs & Reviews
13. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 13
Indexed pagesVisibility Presence in the social media Link-based ranks
Usage Geographical distribution of users Visit-based ranks
Domain (particular acronym) Google
GetJealous.com (GJ) 716,000
MyTripJournal.com (MT) 921,000
RealTravel.com (RT) 2,630,000
TravBuddy.com (TY) 282,000
TravelBlog.org (TB) 8,860,000
TravellersPoint.com (TS) 1,380,000
TravelPod.com (TP) 11,400,000
TripAdvisor.com (TA) 116,000,000
VirtualTourist.com (VT) 7,910,000
Domain (particular acronym) Google
BarcelonaTurisme.com (BT) 27,400
CostaBrava.org (CB) 116,000
CostaDaurada.info (CD) 439
GenCat.cat (GC) 8,210,000
LleidaTur.com (LT) 23,000
Spain.info (SP) 1,510,000
TerresDelEbre.org (TE) 33,400
TurismePropBarcelona.cat (PB) 109,000
VisitPirineus.com (VP) 58,000
VisitValdAran.com (VV) 115,000
Official Tourism Websites Travel Blog & Review Websites
Travel Blog and Review websites have a greater visibility than Official
Tourism websites
Travel blogs and reviews audience
Travel Blog and Review websites have a wider usage than Official
Tourism websites
Official Tourism Websites
Mainly from Spain
3. Methodology: Database
Data dissemination
14. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 14
CONCEPT DECISION
Receptacle Text
Approach Quantitative approach massive analysis
Interpretation Thematic approach
Categories of
analysis
Geography: region and sub-regions
Attraction factors
Feelings and dichotomies
Cultural identity references
Analysis units Keywords within categories
Measuring system Frequency counts
Software Site Content Analyzer
Other software: Java utility to process strings
3. Methodology:Content analysis
15. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 15
Word groups (total databases)
Matrix with content categories (file-per-file)
Statistics
Additional measures
Descriptive statistics
P-correlation
1st level
Most frequent words (50 meaningful words)
Specific preliminary study of outstanding elements (Gaudí)
User-generated image per brands
Spatial indexes
2nd level
3rd level
Group of
categories
Territory1 Territory 2 Territory 3 Territory 4 …
Category 1 SW Density ‰ … … … …
Subcategory 1a … … … … …
Subcategory 1b … … … … …
Category 2 … … … … …
Subcategory 2a … … … … …
Subcategory 2b … … … … …
Subcategory 2c … … … … …
… … … … … …
Location quotient:
..
.
. x
x
x
x
LQ i
j
ij
ij Localization coefficient:
h
j
j
i
ij
i
x
x
x
x
LC
1 ..
.
.2
1
Specialization coefficient:
n
i
i
j
ij
j
x
x
x
x
SC
1 ..
.
.2
1
Diversification coefficient:
n
i ij
n
i ij
j
xn
x
DC
1
2
1
2
)(
1
n: Number of sectors
.ix : Total value in sector i
ijx : Value in sector i in region j
h: Number of regions
jx. : Total value in region j
..x : Total value (in all sectors and regions)
Confirmatory cluster analysis
Zoom into a subject through
“regular language”
Group or
category
Count Site-Wide Density Average Weight
Word_a1 ... ... ...
Word_a2 ... ... ...
Word_a3 ... ... ...
Word_a4 ... ... ...
GROUP A ... ... ...
Word_b1 ... ... ...
Word_b2 ... ... ...
GROUP B ... ... ...
CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 CATEGORY 3 CATEGORY 4
T-BLOG 1 XXX XXX XXX XXX
T-BLOG 2 XXX XXX XXX XXX
T-BLOG 3 XXX XXX XXX XXX
T-BLOG 4 XXX XXX XXX XXX
… … … … …
3. Methodology:Measures
16. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 16
OFFICIAL TOURISM WEBSITES TRAVEL BLOGS AND REVIEWS
Rank Word Count
Site-wide
Density
Average
Weight
Rank Word Count
Site-wide
Density
Average
Weight
1 Barcelona 8105 0.69% 9.31 1 Barcelona 100248 3.36% 40.02
2 Catalonia 5628 0.48% 11.59 2 Sagrada Família 18,859 0.62% 38.65
3 route 4904 0.42% 11.05 3 city 17372 0.58% 9.78
4 area 3665 0.31% 4.37 4 Gaudí 16777 0.56% 17.80
5 tourist 3629 0.31% 11.65 5 great 13222 0.44% 10.85
6 museum 3516 0.30% 12.48 6 Parc Güell 12482 0.40% 40.27
7 Girona 3344 0.28% 15.96 7 people 11706 0.39% 4.30
8 town 3071 0.26% 4.57 8 night 10941 0.36% 7.20
9 Catalan 3055 0.26% 2.74 9 way 10800 0.36% 6.62
10 centre 2950 0.25% 4.90 10 tour 10673 0.35% 9.61
11 century 2924 0.25% 2.08 11 Spain 10540 0.35% 19.72
12 turisme 2893 0.25% 14.91 12 good 10231 0.34% 5.56
13 church 2793 0.24% 5.82 13 place 9941 0.33% 5.98
14 city 2742 0.23% 3.60 14 Spanish 8802 0.29% 9.06
15 museu 2702 0.23% 7.75 15 bus 8729 0.29% 10.66
3,171 OTWs pages
27,104 T-B&R entries
1st level
Top words
Mentions of
brands and
municipalities
(Site-wide density)
4. Selected results
20. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 20
3,124 OTWs pages
25,357 T-B&R entries
2nd level
Official Tourism Websites Travel Blogs and Reviews
Barna 1. New/fashionable (0.818)
2. Culture remaining words (0.784)
3. Cheap (0.756)
4. Catalan (0.747)
5. Urban environment (0.712)
6. History/industrial (0.696)
7. Authentic (0.696)
8. Leisure and recreational activities
(0.695)
9. Leisure remaining words (0.690)
10. shopping (0.673)
11. orderly (0.670)
12. Barcelona attractions (0.666)
1. Tangible Heritage (0.368)
2. Urban Environment (0.347)
3. Gaudí (0.316)
4. Spanish (0.315)
5. Buildings and architecture (0.303)
6. Good feelings (0.300)
7. Barcelona attractions (0.286)
8. Urban tourism/general sites
(0.280)
9. Bad feelings (0.253)
10. Food and Drinks (0.242)
11. Food and Wine (0.226)
12. Art, design, art styles (0.226)
Official Tourism Websites Travel Blogs and Reviews
cDaur 1. Other city attractions (0.546)
2. Good feelings (0.523)
3. Sun, Sea, Sand (0.518)
4. Theme Parks (0.516)
5. Archaeological sites (0.506)
6. Old/old-fashioned (0.503)
7. Leisure remaining words (0.501)
8. Catalan (0.501)
9. Leisure and recreational activities
(0.497)
10. Intangible Heritage (0.490)
11. History/industrial (0.488)
12. Tangible heritage (0.473)
1. Archaeological sites (0.284)
2. Other city attractions (0.138)
3. Tarraco viva (0.138)
4. Theme Parks (0.110)
5. Old/old-fashioned (0.100)
6. Mediterranean (0.090)
7. Sun, Sea, Sand (0.084)
8. tllei (0.077)
9. Intangible Heritage (0.074)
10. Art, design, art styles (0.073)
11. Leisure and recreational activities
(0.071)
12. History/industrial (0.069)
Barcelona
Costa Daurada
4. Selected results
Correlations brands/categories
21. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 21
Attraction factor Barna
Most Freq.
Words
Comments
7. Tangible Heritage 46.88%
- Sagrada Família
- Gaudí
- Parc Güell
- Church
- museum
The main tourist attraction factor of the Barcelona brand is its tangible heritage. It can
be observed that the Barcelona brand identity and image are mainly associated with
Gaudí and architecture. Gaudí, his masterpieces and the related subject of architecture
account for more than one half of the tangible heritage mentioned about Barcelona.
8. Urban
environment
20.28%
- ramblas
- metro
- rambla
- market
Within the “urban environment” category the most common element mentioned, as
could be expected, is 8.2 “Barcelona attractions”.
1. Food and Wine 9.11%
- tapas
- wine
- chocolate
- beer
- paella
Barcelona has a good number of restaurants and places to drink. 1.2 “Wine” only
represents 11.26% and the rest belongs to 1.1. “Food and drinks”.
3. Leisure and
Recreation
8.44%
- bar/s
- club
- recovered
- Tibidabo
These two categories (1. “Food and wine” and 3. “Leisure and recreation”) are
considerably present because Barcelona, as a big city, has a great variety of restaurants
and food offer and also a great leisure offer (concerts, theatre, nightlife, festivals, etc.).
6. Sun, Sea and Sand 6.76%
- beach
- port
- sea
- sun
After that comes the identification of Barcelona with attraction factor 6. “sun, sea and
sand” (6,76%), which is comprehensible as Barcelona is a coastal Mediterranean port
city.
5. Sports 3.88%
- Nou Camp
- stadium
- barca
- Olympic
- game
Then we can see that the category of sports in Barcelona is the highest of all brands
(3.88%)
4. Nature and active
tourism
3.19%
- mountain/s
- tree/s
- nature
This factor is low because of the eminently urban nature of the space of the brand.
2. Intangible
Heritage
1.45%
- flamenco
- parade
- siesta
- La Mercè/
Merce
This last category is surprisingly low as Barcelona holds multiple folkloric, traditional
and popular mass celebrations. However, it seems bloggers do not identify the
intangible heritage with the city and its surroundings very strongly, and the little they
do, they associate it with flamenco, parades or siesta which are not traditions of
Catalan origin. The only genuine celebration of Barcelona mentioned is La Mercè.
23,435
T-B&R
entries
3rd level
Barcelona
Indexed
Card
4. Selected results
23. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 23
Tourists mention very popular prominent elements (must-sees), and concentrate on very
specific territories (the region’s capital) while official tourism websites promote elements
of all types and all brand regions.
Bloggers and reviewers use more attribute-based words and feelings, while official
tourism websites show a more “holistic” image of the destinations, more centered on
general descriptions.
Cultural identity images transmitted by tourists are highly based on stereotypes,
fragmented and partial.
Great geographical imbalance or disproportion and specialization of image transmission
of the different sub-regional brand territories.
Significant dissonances exist in the destination image (Bandyopahyay & Morais, 2005) of
the region and sub-regions studied at the levels of attribute-based identity, cultural
identity and spatial distribution of image.
Great dissonance in front-nodes between user and destination generated images at
regional and sub-regional levels.
Multiple representations of the same destination and struggles exist (Andsager &
Drzewicka, 2002) in the online environment (Choi et al., 2007; Krizman & Belullo, 2007).
The perceived image that tourists hold once they have visited a destination does not
correspond to the one constructed and projected by the destinationH1
5. Conclusions
24. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 24
With the creation of user-generated content and its transmission through the social
media, image perceived by tourists becomes transmitted image and the image
formation circle is increasingly closed from tourist to tourist due to its great potential
influence. User-generated image online has a greater potential to influence than
official destination image.
H2
Greater visibility and usage of travel blogs and reviews vs. official tourism websites.
The image perceived by tourists becomes instantly transmitted to other tourists
online in web 2.0 spaces.
The potential to influence of user-generated contents and the social media is
growing every day due to the increasing creation of contents, their acceptance,
trustworthiness, the capacity of meeting tourists’ needs and interests, and the
many advantages they present for users (Cox et al., 2008).
The circle of image formation is increasingly taking place in a solely user milieu and
the importance of the different sources throughout the tourist process changes.
Local organizations’ loss of control over user-generated images. Now, pre-trip
promotion is no longer dominated by outsiders (tour operators) (Dann, 1996) but
by users.
Need for a new paradigm when perceived image becomes transmitted image
5. Conclusions
25. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 25
5. Conclusions
Objective method to select the most relevant data sources for the case study and
establishment of a selection criterion according to research goals.
It includes the analysis of websites’ image dissemination to assess the capacity the
information sources targeted have to disseminate the information they convey.
Massive analysis of data:
All travel blogs and reviews about our case study on the websites fulfilling the
criterion.
key: Creation of a database Download web pages and entries to the PC, arrange
them into a structure of folders and files. Data cleaning and debugging, language
detection, data mining.
Quantitative content analysis performed on online texts, based on word counts or
frequencies and word grouping into categories, proved to be a useful and appropriate
method of analysis to shed light on the projected and perceived images of a destination.
Computerized content analysis through Site Content Analyzer and other software are
suitable to deal with quantitative data and large sets of analysis.
It enables to look deeper into certain complex aspects, such as cultural identity and the
spatial distribution of tourist image through the adaptation of spatial indexes.
Methodological framework could be used for other studies whose target were different
destinations and different types of online media and tourist websites, and periods of time.
Utility and benefits of the methodology
26. ENTER 2015 PhD Workshop Slide Number 26
Thanks for your attention!
Estela Mariné-Roig
University Rovira i Virgili, Catalonia, Spain
estela.marine@urv.cat
http://www.urv.cat
Editor's Notes
The structure of the presentation is as follows: first I will present the aims and hypothesis
The theoretical framework departs from and develops the concept of destination image as a complex construct and the image formation process. The definition proposed is that he
However, today destination image formation cannot be understood without the Internet and web 2.0. So these aspects are developed.
What is new about the image transmitted through web 2.0 is that the intentionality and power struggles change, users don’t have an economic intentionality to post images online but a leisure or personal one, so that these images become highly trustworthy and influential.
In this context, then more and more interest is being drawn to the different images existing online provided by users in web 2.0, and how different they are from DMO (Destination Management Organization)-produced images.
Now moving on to the methodology, the first important aspect is that we analysed a specific case study.
This methodology deals with a massive quantitative content analysis of official tourism web pages and of travel blogs and reviews. The first step to do that is to obtain a suitable database for analysis. The process to obtain it is as follows: First the specific data sources, both travel blog and reviews and official tourism websites must be chosen. We decided to compare both official tourism websites and travel blogs and reviews images.
From this process the first database obtained of files is the following: distributed in the different official tourism websites of the region.
Then the database ofbtained from travel blogs and reviews how blogs and re iews are distributed per tourism brands. Then data mining enabled to see the country of origin of tourists and finally the language of posts was also identified (the main language is English and this language was used for most of the analysis).
Then about the potential of data dissemination both sources have I will show a couple of interesting results. Vibility was measured through indexed pages, presence in the social media and link based ranks. In the case of indexed pages we see that travel blog and review websites have a much greated visibility online than official tourism websites and therefore have a greatedr potential to disseminate their image.
Then about usage we analysed if the audience origin and what we saw is that the audience of travel blogs and review is much wider than that of official tourism websites which is mostly only Spanish.
Content analysis was the technique suitable for analysis.
I calculated correlations between the different brands and the categories. As you can see some of the brands are correlated mostly to the same elements in both official websites and travel blogs and reviews but in the case of Barcelona.