Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
Approach to the cystic lesion of pancrease
1. Approach to cystic lesion of
Pancreas
Dr. Kiran Pandey
MS Gen. Surgery Resident,
Bir Hospital, NAMS
2. Approach
Is the lesion from pancreas?
Lesion is solid or cystic?
Neoplastic v/snon-neoplastic?
SCAv/s MCN v/sIPMN?
Management?
3. Case
27 years male
c/o earlySatiety,Recurrent vomiting and loss of appetite -3 to
4 months.
Vomitus contained food
occurred ½ to 1hour after meals
Non-bilious,non-projectile
h/o diffuse abdominal pain for 4 weeks
significant weight loss++
Anorexia ++
4. Preceding h/o severe abdominal pain
multiple episodes,
consumption of alcohol
H/o abdominal distension
History of similar pain in the past over last 2 years .
No other medical or surgical history
6. Investigation
LFT – WNL
S. Amylase and Lipase were normal
USG
A cystic lesion in the lesser sac about 14x15cm
CECT – 15x 17 cm well-circumscribed, oval pancreatic bed fluid collections
of homogeneously low attenuation,
surrounded by a well-defined enhancing wall adherant to posterior wall of
stomach and compressing stomach cavity.
cystic wall-3mm; MPD- normal; retroperitoneal lymphnode is enlarged.
S. CA 19-9 – 1.4 ng/ml
S. CEA – 2.3 ng/ml
7.
8. Must know
Broad differential diagnosis
Epidemiology of common lesions
Clinical presentation
Blood tests
Imaging
Histology
18. Cysts with a solid component
Unilocular or multilocular
True cystic tumors or solid pancreatic neoplasms with cystic
component/degeneration
Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPEN)
Mucinous cystic neoplasms
IPMNs
Islet cell tumor
Adenocarcinoma
Metastasis
19. Pancreatic Pseudocyst
Symptoms
Abdominal pain (80 – 90%)
Lump in abdomen
Nausea / vomiting ( due to gastric or duodenal compression)
Early satiety
Bloating, indigestion
Jaundice ( due to compression of bile duct)
Hemorrhage
20. Blood tests in suspected pseudocyst
Amylase/Lipase
Signs
Tenderness
Abdominal fullness
Palpable mass
21. ImaginginPseudocyst…..
Ultrasonography
Most practical & Sensitivity (75 – 90%)
limited by patient habitus, operator experience and air in
stomach
CT scan
Gold standard for initial assessment and follow-up
Sensitivity 90- 100%
22. MRI
Better detail of content of cyst
MRCP
Establish the relationship of the pseudocyst to the pancreatic ducts
Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS +/- FNA)
Distinguishing pancreatic cystic lesions, helps in FNA
23. When a cysticlesions with…..
Sudden onset of pain consistent with pancreatitis pain
Imaging features of associatedpancreatitis
Unilocular cyst;and
Elevated amylase/lipase
25. MUCINOUS CYSTIC NEOPLASMS
Most common - 10% to 45% (MCA -67%, MCAC - 33%)
> 95% in women ( Mean ~ 50 yrs)
Typically involve the body and tail of the pancreas
Never multifocal, occurring only in one location within
the pancreas.
26. Asymptomatic in 75% cases
If symptoms, usually due to mass effect
Adominal pain
Palpable mass
27. Complex macrocystic mass with internal septations
MRCP no communication between duct and the cyst
Contrast enhanced scans show enhancement of the cyst wall a
accentuate any septations and mural nodules
Presence of mural nodule and septal calcification s/o –
malignancy
28. EUS can identify septations and cyst wall nodules In more
detail than MRI or CT
Allows cyst wall biopsy and cyst fluid aspiration for analysis
Cyst fluid analysis generally reveals
thick and mucoid material and low fluid amylase
elevated tumor markers (CEA)
mucinous epithelial cells by cytology
30. SEROUS CYSTADENOMAS
Second MC Cystic tumor of the pancreas
formerly known as microcystic adenomas
Occurring mostly in women (75%) with a mean 62 years
Most (50% to 70%) occur in the body or tail of the pancreas
An association with von Hippel-Lindau disease
Mostly asymptomatic
detected during evaluation for other unrelated conditions
32. Serous cystadenoma
Pathognomonic image by CT scan:
spongy mass with a central “sunburst” calcification -
10%
4 /5 CT and MRI features makes diagnosis
location in the pancreatic body and tail
wall thickness < 2 mm
lobulated contour
lack of communication with the pancreatic duct
minimal wa ll enhancement
33. Intra-ductal PapillaryMucinousNeoplasm
Types
depend on involvement of duct
main pancreatic duct, isolated side branches, or a combination
of both
Benign (adenoma), borderline, or malignant
Malignant neoplasms account for 60% of IPMNs
34. Equal frequency in men and women
Median age at diagnosis - about 65 years
75% of patients are symptomatic
Abdominal pain and weight loss – MC complaints
Recurrent pancreatitis or Acute pancreatitis
Patients with malignant neoplasms are more likely to be
older and more likely to present with jaundice or new-
onset diabetes
35. Diagnosis
Differentiation of IPMN from other cystic pancreatic masses may be
difficult at CT
Most reliable findings for the diagnosis
Presence of a communication between the cystic lesion andthe main
pancreatic duct
Presence of mural nodules projecting into the main pancreatic duct or
cystic lesions
Diffusely distended pancreatic duct with mucinous filling defects and grape-
like, cystic, space-occupying lesions
Sensitivity in diagnosing an IPMN
Highest for MRI with MRCP (88%),followed by ERCP (68%)and CT (42%)
36. Pathognomonic for IPMN in ERCP
A wide and gaping papilla with secretion of mucin and filling
defects in the dilated pancreatic duct –FISH MOUTH
AMPULLA
40. Cysticlesionsof pancreas; will blood tests
help?
Amylase and/or Lipase??
CEA? Ca 19-9 ??
Not diagnostic of any of the cystic pancreatic tumors
Only provide corroborative evidence
41. Serum amylaseor lipase levels
Increased - Pseudocyst, IPMN
Serum CA19-9& CEA
Normal - benign cystic pancreatic tumors
Modestly elevated - MCNs and IPMNs, particularly
patients with malignancies
Markedlyelevated -retention cyst secondary to obstruction
of the main pancreatic duct by anadenocarcinoma.
42. Viscosity Amylase Cytology
Pseudocyst Low High Inflamm.
SCA Low Low 5% +
MCA High Low 40% +
MCAC High Low 67% +
CEA CA 15-3 CA 72-4
Pseudocyst Low Low Low
SCA Low Low Low
MCA High High Low
MCAC High High High
1 Lewandrowski KB, et al. Ann Surg 1993,217:41-7.
2 Brugge WR, et al. N Engl J Med 2004,351:1218-26.
Cyst Fluid Analysis