7. Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm
Less common than SCN & IPMN
Thick wall and thick fluid
Mucus or hemorrhagic material
Occasional septae
All cases to be considered as premalignanent
Female > Male 20:1
Body and tail >95%
50years mean age
8. On MRCP β No communication with MPD
Histology β Ovarian stroma
Cyst fluid - Thick mucoid material ,
Low amylase,
Elevated CEA,
Mucinous epithelial cells on cytology.
Surgical resection in all.
12. Malignant potential β No, or little
Treatment β Surveillance or No treatment
unless symptomatic.
Association β VHL Syndrome
13. IPMN
6th to 7th decade
F = M
Clinical presentation - Incidental, abdominal pain, pancreatitis,
symptoms or signs of malabsorption.
Imaging - Dilated main pancreatic duct or pancreatic duct
branches; solid component, if present may suggest malignancy.
Cytology- Positive for mucin, columnar epithelium with
variable atypia.
14. Malignant potential- Yes (MD-IPMN > BD-
IPMN)
Treatment - Resection for main duct IPMN
and resection or surveillance for branch duct
IPMN depending upon the clinical situation.
Prognosis β Excellent if adenoma
Poor if adenocarcinoma
16. Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm
F>M
4th Decade or less
Usually incidental, abdominal pain or palpable mass
Solid and cystic mass
Myxoid stroma
Malignant potential β yes
Resection
19. Characteristics that favor Pseudo cyst
Lack of septae
Lack of loculations
No Solid components
No Cyst wall calcifications
Fluid amylase level high
Communication with MPD
Lack epithelial lining
Antecedent h/o acute or chronic pancreatitis.
24. Do incidental/asymptomatic pancreatic
cysts need to be evaluated?
β’ most cysts
detected today
are
asymptomatic
and more than
half of these are
premalignant
(MCN and IPMN).
Yes,
25. What if the asymptomatic cyst is very
small, say 5 mm?
A reasonable approach
may be to repeat cross-
sectional imaging in a
year to assess for change.
26. Do all cystic neoplasm's have to be
evaluated with EUS?
β’ In some cases, the
clinical and MRI findings
are sufficient to
diagnose the type of
cystic lesion with
confidence.
No,
27. Is EUS imaging alone all we need for the
evaluation of a pancreatic cystic lesion?
Cyst fluid needs to be evaluated with cytology and
tumour markers.
Determination of morphology based on EUS imaging is
not specific enough.
No
28. Should all cysts be aspirated?
No
In some situations aspiration is not indicated
Or may even be contraindicated.
29. Are all cysts occurring in the setting of
pancreatitis are pseudo cysts?
Only half of the cysts associated with pancreatitis
may be Pseudo cysts
IPMN may present with pancreatitis.
No
30. Should antibiotics be administered at
the time of cyst FNA?
β’Broad spectrum
IV antibiotic (
quinolone) at
the time of cyst
aspiration
It is accepted
practice to
administer
31. If surgery is not
undertaken, how should
these lesions be
followed?
32. Cyst seen on imaging
>3cm and Positive
features on MRI
Repeat MRI in 1year
and biannualy to year 5 EUS +FNA
NO
YES
33. Repeat MRI in 1 year and Bi
annually to year 5
EUS +FNA
Concerning cytology
and positive features
YES
Consider
surgery
NO
N
O
Stop
Surveillance
+ve
changes
35. The use of cyst fluid KRAS to identify mucinous lesions
is highly specific (greater than 95%) and moderately
sensitive(45%).other GNAS DNA ,micro RNA.
Groups have used ethanol injection, in the
Ethanol Pancreatic Injection of Cysts (EPIC) trial
, as well as combination ethanol/paclitaxel
injection .Used in patients not fit for surgery.